It is common knowledge that Tony Rezko, convicted of multiple counts of corruption in Chicago, helped Obama buy his mansion in Chicago. It is now known that Joe Biden has connections to Joseph Cari and Tony Rezko.
Did real estate developer and campaign funder, Keith Stoltz, help Joe Biden buy his house on over 4 acres?
We are not accusing Joe Biden or Keith Stoltz of any impropriety. However we have facts about the transactions that do look very suspect.
Consider the following:
The property was purchased by Stephan J III & Mary Ann Pyle in 1979 for $ 450,000.
The property was purchased by Keith D Stoltz in 1991 for $ 350,000.
The property was purchased by Joseph R Jr & Jill Biden in 1996 for $ 350,000.
There are 2 homes on the property of over 4 acres.
The tax value is $ 525700. The address is 1209 BARLEY MILL RD, WILMINGTON, DE 19807. Use one of the online valuation sites and discover the value of the property.
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any better. Just when you thought the height of lies, deception and corruption had been achieved. Along comes another tie to Tony Rezko and crime and corruption in Chicago and Illinois. We have a balanced ticket in Obama and Biden. They both have ties to Tony Rezko and Joseph Cari.
ABC News has a new article about Joe Biden and his ties to Joseph Cari and Tony rezko. Here are some exerpts from the article:
“Biden Tied to Rezko Fraud Figure
Vice-Presidential Candidate’s Former Campaign Advisor and Fundraiser Aided Kickback Scheme
By JUSTIN ROOD
August 25, 2008
Barack Obama’s vice-presidential pick complicates the Democratic hopeful’s efforts to distance himself from a far-reaching Chicago patronage scandal.
Vice-presidential candidate Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del. (left), has been advised since 1984 by Joseph Cari (right), the Chicago lawyer and onetime mega-fundraiser who has been tied to the Antoin “Tony” Rezko patronage scandal.”
“Chicago lawyer and onetime mega-fundraiser Joseph Cari has advised Biden and his campaigns on and off since 1984, serving in posts as varied as a Senate adviser on crime to the Midwest Political Director for Biden’s aborted 1987 presidential bid. In 2005 Cari helped arrange private meetings for Biden with potential supporters, as the senator explored another run for the White House. He has also worked to raise money for Biden . ”
“Cari admitted that in 2004 he helped a Rezko associate by making calls in what turned out to be a kickback scheme. The deal was an offshoot of a complex corruption scheme wrought by Antoin “Tony” Rezko , whose ties to Obama have vexed the White House hopeful . Cari has maintained he did not know the details of that scheme or any other.
Cari’s sentencing is delayed while he cooperates with the investigation. He testified at Rezko’s trial earlier this year, in which a jury found Rezko guilty on 16 of 24 corruption-related felony charges. Obama, who entered into a complex real estate transaction with Rezko and his wife in 2005 that appeared to aid the senator, has returned nearly $150,000 in donations he received from Rezko and his associates over the years.”
Larry Sinclair has a new post up. Larry Sinclair was informed that Susan Dwyer of the Delaware Attorney Generals office allegedly received numerous disrespectful emails from Larry Sinclair supporters. Sinclair states that the emails are from the same Obama supporters who sent phony emails before. Here is the article from Larry Sinclair:
Dear Attorney General Joseph R. Biden, III and DAG Susan Dwyer:
I have NEVER sent a single email to your office or to anyone employed by your office, nor do I appreciate being accused of doing so. Should I have deleted Ms. Dwyers email address from the email, maybe. But unlike the claims attributed to your office by the News-Journal and other internet sites, I prefer to make truthful statements as to what was said by your office.
In addition, NO one supporting me would ever email Ms. Dwyer or anyone else in your office being disrespectful. I submit that if you claim that is the case, the emails should be investigated and I do believe your office will find that any such emails will have originated from the same people who have for more than 2 months claimed to be in regular contact with Susan Dwyer, and who claim Ms. Dwyer has provided them, the “false” information that has been published about me and this case all over the internet since June 23, 2008.
The statements made by me concerning this matter are factual and necessary because of the untrue statements being reported and attributed to the Delaware prosecutors office.
Fact # 1: The Delaware Attorney Generals office has been requested three separate times to provide the defense with copies of the returned unpaid money orders, and the Delaware Attorney Generals office has to this date, yet to comply.
Fact #2: The Delaware Attorney Generals office did make the statement that their offer of a misdemeanor sounds good right now, in claiming they would seek Habit status after I refused to accept your offer. Which I had informed my attorney from day one I would not plead guilty to anything.
Fact # 3: I will submit to the Delaware Attorney General the same offer made to FBI Special Agent Brenda Born, which is if you are accusing me of sending emails to your office or to Ms. Dwyer, produce the alleged emails and I will cooperate with any independent investigator wishing to search my computer and or accounts.
I also am certain that any emails your office claims to be from my supporters, if investigated properly, will lead you back to the very individuals who claim Ms. Dwyer has been communicating with when they were publishing false information on this case along with News-Journal reporters.
Any communication between me and the office of the Delaware Attorney Generals office has, and will continue to be, done through my Attorney. Just as my Attorney has been directed to inform your office that your claims I have sent Ms. Dwyer emails is an out right lie and not appreciated in the least.
Philip J Berg, attorney, filed a complaint in Federal Court in Philadelphia on August, 21, 2008. In the complaint against Obama, Mr. Berg states “Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States.” Philip Berg also states the following:
“Senator Obama:
1. Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia.
Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.””
The Philadelphia TimesHerald has an article about Philip J Berg and the lawsuit. Here are some exerpts:
“Born in the U.S.A.?
By: KEITH PHUCAS, Times Herald Staff
08/25/2008
PHILADELPHIA – A Lafayette Hill attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court Thursday challenging Sen. Barack Obama’s claim to United States citizenship. The action seeks to remove the Democratic candidate from the November ballot.
To be eligible to serve as U.S. president, a person must be born in this country. According to Obama’s birth certificate, which his campaign posted on its Internet site in June to quell rumors that he is foreign born, the Illinois senator was born in Hawaii on Aug. 6, 1961.
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
“We really don’t believe he was born in Hawaii,” Berg said. “We think he was born in Kenya.”
The presidential candidate’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, according to Obama’s campaign Web site.
Berg’s suit claims the senator’s grandmother, brother and sister, who live in Kenya, believe they were present during Obama’s birth in the African country.”
Remember when you read information like The Annenberg Political Fact Check, they have ties to Obama and the Obama Campaign. So far, the Obama Campaign has only produced fake COLB (certificates of live birth).
Sooner or later Obama will have to prove he is a US citizen.
If you are tired of the lies and deception of Obama, voice your concern here:
For months there have been outcries from all over the nation of illegal practices at primaries and caucases around the country. Hillary Clinton and her supporters have cried foul over and over again. The Obama Campaign has made deception, attacks and dirty politics it’s hallmark. Recently it has been revealed that the Obama Campaign paid over $ 800,000 to Acorn, an organization with a history of documented voter fraud involvement.
Dr. Lynette Long has collected data and reports from the primaries and she has analyzed the data for accuracy. Texas has many reports of voter fraud and suspicious activity. This article will focus on Texas to provide a glimpse at how serious voter fraud was. Here are some reports from texas from Dr. Lynette Long:
“FROM TEXAS
I was at the Texas Caucus and the Obama supporter’s took the Packets as early as 6:30 AM which they were told not to do, They never let go and then when time came to vote they took over the precinct by some of them pushing the people that were supposed to run it across the room to chairs. They called in incorrect totals for Obama instead of correct ones. He actually had 4 delegates and they called in 19 delegates.
When my 88 year old Mother showed up, who can hardly walk on her walker, and they took her walker away from her when she said she was there to vote for Hillary. They said you are in the wrong place old woman; this is an Obama precinct, and you need to go across town. When I saw what was happening I called the police. Blog post no quarter evelyn
FROM TEXAS
As an eye witness at the Precinct and Senate District Conventions, this is how Obama won many caucuses. First of all, vast numbers of Obama supporters were bused in to the conventions. They were loud and intimidating. Texas Democratic rules state that each person who participates in the Precinct Convention should have voted in this precinct and sign-in personally on a formal sign-in sheet. So many Obama people showed up, that there were not enough sign-in sheets available, so when the conventions ended, there were many sign-in sheets for Obama filled out in the same handwriting, not signed-in as specified. As Hillary supporters, we obtained copies of these sign-in sheets from all over south Texas, Harris County in particular. We laboriously compared the names on the sheets to see if the person who attended the precinct convention had voted in the primary election. Many listed Obama people had not. We then cross-checked the names of the Obama people to see if they lived in the correct precinct. Many times the Obama people did not come to the correct precinct and often appeared on sign-in sheets, as being present in several precinct conventions at the same time (a violation of the space-time continuum).
FROM THE TEXAS CONVENTION
I walked into the Nueses,Texas County Convention only to discover that I was already there as an Obama delegate.
FROM THE TEXAS CONVENTION
They shoved Obama signs in Clinton delegates’ faces, three inches from the nose, called them racists, and told my friend that she had to move from her third-row seat in one meeting and go sit in the back. She also said that the proceedings were heavily laced with black power speeches by preachers as well as public officials.”
Here are some exerpts from the analysis of data by Dr. Lynette Long:
“by Lynette Long
On March 4, 2008, Texas held its Democratic Primary, affectionately called the Texas-Two Step. Polls were open from 7 am to 7 pm and then after the polls closed, persons who voted in primary could participate in a caucus. According to CNN a total of 2,867,454 votes were cast in the Democratic Primary with 1,458,814 (51%) votes cast for Senator Hillary Clinton and 1,358,785 (47%) votes cast for Senator Barack Obama, and a smattering of votes (49,855) for John Edwards, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, and Chris Dodd combined. A total of 8,247 precinct conventions, commonly called caucuses, took place throughout the 254 counties in Texas, most of which were held at each precinct’s Primary polling place. If 100 people attended each of these “caucuses” than at least 800,000 people attended caucuses. The Dallas Morning News reported a projected turnout of 1.1 million. Overwhelmed by the participation, Texas stopped counting the results at only 41% of precincts counted. As a result of the Texas caucus, Obama was awarded 56% of precinct delegates and Clinton was awarded 44% of the precinct delegates. Since people who voted in the caucuses were required to have voted in their precinct, the voters in the caucus were statistically a subset of the voters in primary, but the results were statistically different. A more sophisticated analysis is required.”
“Concerns about high voter turnout and the inability of the precincts to adequately handle the number of participants and monitor the election process are rampant. On the night of the caucus itself, the Clinton Campaign brought many instances of these irregularities to the attention of the State Party. The
campaign received in excess of 2,000 complaints of rules violations, indicating widespread violations of the Party’s rules, including the following specific occurrences that are clear violations of specific
rules:
Voter Fraud – Temporary Chair packets were released by the election judge prior to 7:00 pm. Sign-in sheets were filled out before 7:00 pm by voters participating in the primary who did not participate in the caucus.
Voter Fraud – Inaccurate written records of participants’ presidential preferences.
Voter Fraud – Precincts were consolidated for purposes of holding a convention.
Voter Disenfranchisement – Precinct caucuses began before polls closed for the primary.
Voter Fraud – Ineligible participants voted or ineligible delegates were elected, including participants who were not registered voters, participants who did not vote in the primary, and provisional voters whose votes were counted; and no verification was made of the eligibility of participants or delegates.
Voter Fraud – Participants’ names and presidential preference were entered on sign-in sheets by someone other than the eligible individual participants.
Voter Fraud – Results were taken from a head count or hand count rather than the written roll.
Due Process – Delegate votes were not ratified by the precinct convention.
Due Process – Failure to follow Robert’s Rules of Order at the precinct convention.”
Now that you have the analysis and data from Dr. Lynette Long, watch the following Youtube video about the Texas voting issues:
“The audacity of democracy
August 02, 2008
Ten minute teaser containing footage from PUMA PAC and Brad Mays’ new political documentary, still being shot around America. At this juncture, the focus is on malfeasance during the Texas primary. It should be pointed out that we’re still loading all the footage we’ve shot up to now into the editing system, and that production will continue through the election and possibly beyond. So what we intend to do is change this teaser on a weekly basis. Sure to generate hot debate.”
If you have concerns about Obama, voice them here:
Philip J Berg, attorney at law, filed a complaint on Thursday, August
21, 2008, against Barack Obama. The complaint states that “Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States.”
MR. Berg states the following in his press release:
“Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.“Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a
Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in his lawsuit that Senator Obama:
1. Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia.
Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”
The defendants in the complaint are:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :
BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :
BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :
BARRY DUNHAM, THE :
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :
COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :
ELECTION COMMISSION AND :
DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE
How will Barack, Barry, the Democratic National committee and the Federal Election commission react?
Obama and the Obama Campaign will attack and use diversions.
So far, the Obama Campaign can only provide a fake COLB. Will that impress the judge?
How will the delegates to the Democratic National Convention react? Will they continue to stick their heads in the sand?
Larry Sinclair has bounced back from another attempt from the Obama camp to silence him. Obama Campaign bloggers inundated the servers at Startlogic and they suspended Larry Sinclair’s sites. These evil Obama supporters, reminiscent of Nazi Brownshirts and “1984” Thought Police, have failed once again to silence Sinclair. What these children of darkness fail to recognize is that when they try to silence Sinclair, they are also attempting to silence the American public, and we will not allow that. We will not allow these modern day Nazi Brownshirts to do what they did in Nazi Germany.
There is a new Youtube video out about the Larry Sinclair drug and sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Many of the Hillary Clinton supporters do not like the way she has been treated and they refuse to vote for Barack Obama. These Hillary supporters are now voting for McCain. Here are some exerpts from their website and the Youtube video:
“Welcome to the website and forum! You can see from the distinctly nonprofessional look that this is not a PAC (Political Action Committee), not a professional political organization. Not yet, anyway.
No, what this is, is a place for other angry pissed-off Hillary voters just like you and I to come and think, talk, discuss, and then mobilize for November. Created by a lowly Hillary Clinton Campaign precinct captain and county and state delegate from a small central neighborhood in Las Vegas, with no other connection with the campaign whatsoever other than that.
First I was going to vote for McCain out of spite. Then I thought I could, that we all could, merely write in Hillary in November, and because she had more popular votes, could then decimate both Obama and McCain.
Then I found out that my own state Nevada does not allow write-in candidates! And that this is true of many states, and many other states have limitations on write-in candidates, like limiting to those who didn’t lose the primary. Absolutely absurd ridiculous limitations that have effectively throttled and destroyed true democracy in the US.
So coming to this point has been a long journey, and here is what I’ve based my own personal November decision on. If you agree, join us.”
“That’s why I’m voting McCain in November. Not only that, I’m, for the first time in my life, voting a straight GOP ticket, right down the line. Sorry, Harry Reid, Shelly Berkley, even though you supported Hillary Clinton, I deeply regret I can no longer support you. Message to Howard Dean and the DNC: Disenfranchise me and mine and the women of America with a loser candidate who can’t possibly win, and you’re in for the single most horrific surprise of your entire political life. Hell hath no fury like a Hillary Clinton supporter scorned. McCain is going to win with or without my vote, anyway. With or without our votes. It’s inevitable. What will prove not to be inevitable will be your Congressional majority which we will strive to destroy. You know, sometimes an animal has to chew off a limb to escape a trap to survive.”
I just spoke to Larry Sinclair and he sent an email with information about how and why his website was shut down. Once again, the same Obama camp thugs are responsible. The have tried personal attacks, death threats, lies, multiple websites being shut down and even phony arrest warrants. I just spoke to Larry Sinclair again. Startlogic will not let him upgrade his service. Here is the info from Larry Sinclair:
“THE OBAMA BLOGOIDIOTS ADMIT TO ATTACKING MY SITES SERVERS. THIS GUESS??? IS EXACTLY WHAT STARTLOGIC JUST STATED AND SENT THE INFO BY THE ATTAHED EMAIL
I suppose there are safeguards against the same thing being done to this site?
DELon 24 Aug 2008 at 3:25 pm
………………………….
My guess, and this is only a guess, is that someone figured out how to create a bandwidth amplification attack using other Sinclair-supported sites to redline the CPU, bandwidth, databases, and storage capacity of Sinclair’s primary site for an extended period of time, resulting in a forced violation of the Terms of Service.
I mean, if I *had* to guess, that’d be my
guess.
========================
ALL HAIL “DEFACER”
(just my guess) he he”
Response from Startlogic:
Hello,
” This is to inform you that we have noticed the files in your account are utilizing heavy network or server resources and it causing critical issues in the pool. So we have suspended the Website.”
” Customer files are creating too many requests to the server and utilising heavy network/server resources. Hence causing critical issues in the pool.”
“If you have any further questions, please update the Support Console.
Sincerely,
Dolly John
Technical Specialist”
Many of Larry Sinclair’s articles can be found on the Citizen Wells blog as well as articles written about Larry Sinclair.
The American people deserve the best leadership available. The
American people deserve honest and fair reporting from the media.
The American people deserve access to information on the internet.
The American people deserve protection from thugs.
Let it be resolved that:
Despite: Control of information regarding Obama on the mainstream
media and biased reporting.
Despite: Scrubbing and repackaging of information on the internet.
Despite: Personal attacks, smears and death threats on those
questioning Obama and his past.
Despite: Attempts to silence those questioning of Obama through
threats, shutting down of websites and incarceration in gulags
in Delaware and elsewhere.
Despite: Voter tampering on an unheard of scale in the US.
Despite: Lies and manipulation of young minds.
Despite: Attempts to reveal personal information about people
questioning Obama.
Despite: Cutting off Social Security Benefits of those questioning
Obama.
Despite: Threats of riots and racial tension and tagging people as racist.
We the American people, resolve to seek the truth about Barack Obama
and protect the rights of American citizens. No threats of any
type will deter us from our rights. No threats on our fellow
Americans will be tolerated. We will not allow the American voting
process to collapse into a state of chaos as in Kenya.
Citizen WElls 