Category Archives: The Case Against Barack Obama

Assange extradition prosecution pushed by deep state Obama holdovers, Glenn Greenwald: Rice, Brennan, Comey and Clapper exposed by Assange and Snowden

Posted on September 14, 2020 | 5 comments

Assange extradition prosecution pushed by deep state Obama holdovers, Glenn Greenwald: Rice, Brennan, Comey and Clapper exposed by Assange and Snowden

“Replying to this last point, the prosecution pointed out that a Grand Jury against Assange had been established by Obama and there was no indication the investigation had been closed. Feldstein agreed, the “Obama administration was very eager to file charges against Assange and they conducted a very aggressive investigation.” All of which speaks for the point that Assange is being sought for political reasons—motivations which are common to the whole American ruling class. It was current Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden who branded the WikiLeaks publisher and journalist a “high-tech terrorist.””…Laura Tiernan and Thomas Scripps, Sept 9, 2020

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

“Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al  August 24, 2020”…Citizen Wells

 

Where there is smoke there is fire.

So it is with the deep state Democrats, the left.

They are absolute masters of diversions.

Almost the entire period of the Trump Presidency, they have diverted attention away from the DNC leaks and what they revealed.

We now know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the narrative of the Russian hack and collusion is false, fabricated by the deep state.

The last remaining piece of the puzzle is who did it.

Julian Assange is the one person who knows for sure where he got the data.

A mountain of circumstantial evidence points to Seth Rich.

At least 4 prominent court cases have been dragging on and have issued requests for testimony from Julian Assange.

High powered law firms have aided the Rich family.

The obvious intent is to drag this also past the election cycle.

Ellen Ratner, former journalist who met with Julian Assange, was told it was an inside job. She has finally responded after 6 subpoena attempts with sealed documents.

See a trend?

So who is pushing the control of, the extradition, the prosecution, the persecution of Julian Assange?

We were told the Obama Administration dropped this effort.

But we have also witnessed the Obama Administration appointed or controlled DOJ officials who are anti Trump and beholden to the deep state.

Here are just 2 for starters.

Megan Brown.

From CBC May 10, 2017.

“Megan Brown, a Washington lawyer who formerly worked at the Department of Justice and also with Rosenstein, believes the main challenge will be intense confirmation hearings she expects will take an “extraordinarily political and partisan” tone.
Although the future of the Trump-Russia probe itself could be thrown into question, Brown is nevertheless confident the Department of Justice will proceed with the investigation “without improper influence or any unnecessary delay” due to a change at the top of the bureau.”

From the US v Assange Affidavit in support of a Criminal Complaint and Arrest Warrant December 21, 2017.

“I, Megan Brown, make this affidavit in support of a criminal complaint”

“I am a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation (FBI) and have
been so employed since February 2011.”

“The facts in this Affidavit are based on my personal observations, information
obtained from other agents and witnesses, my training and experience, and my review ofrecords, reports, articles, and websites.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.384245/gov.uscourts.vaed.384245.2.0_3.pdf

Tracy Doherty-McCormick.

From the Washington Post April 20, 2017.

“Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Doherty-McCormick, who examined the case under the Obama administration, also has been working on the matter in recent weeks, officials said.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-dept-debating-charges-against-wikileaks-members-in-revelations-of-diplomatic-cia-materials/2017/04/20/32b15336-2548-11e7-a1b3-faff0034e2de_story.html

Tracy Doherty-McCormick’s name is prominent on the legal filings in this case.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14488287/united-states-v-assange/

Glenn Grenwald nails it on a recent Tucker Carlson interview.

Tucker investigates why ‘DOJ is pursuing Julian Assange aggressively’

Some of Glenn Greenwald’s statements:

“He exposed the lies that James Clapper told”
“and obviously this isn’t coming from President Trump.”
“This is coming from people who work in the CIA, who work in the Pentagon…who believe they’re a government unto themselves”
“They’re punishing Julian Assange and trying to punish Edward Snowden for informing the public about things they have a right to know about the Obama Administration.”
“The only people who would be angry would be Susan Rice, John Brennan, Jim Comey and James Clapper because they’re the ones who both of them expose.”

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

5 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Court of Appeals, Courts, Criminal Complaint, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Justice, Murder, Obama, Obama administration, The Case Against Barack Obama, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Obamagate: Peter Strzok’s January 2017 notes implicate Obama and Biden?, Obama directed that ‘the right people’ investigate General Flynn

Posted on June 25, 2020 | 35 comments

Obamagate: Peter Strzok’s January 2017 notes implicate Obama and Biden?, Obama directed that ‘the right people’ investigate General Flynn

“Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act. That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn,”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

Peter Strzok’s January 2017 notes, presented in discovery recently, were made public in court on Wednesday, June 24, 2020.

From John Solomon at Just The News.

“Strzok’s newly discovered FBI notes deliver jolt to ‘Obamagate’ evidence

James Comey had no business meeting with Obama White House on Flynn case, former FBI executive says.

The belated discovery of disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok’s January 2017 notes raises troubling new questions about whether President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were coordinating efforts during their final days in office to investigate Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn — even as the FBI wanted to shut down the case.

Investigators will need to secure testimony from Strzok, fired two years ago from the FBI, to be certain of the exact meaning and intent of his one paragraph of notes, which were made public in court on Wednesday.

But they appear to illuminate an extraordinary high-level effort by outgoing Obama-era officials during the first weekend of January to find a way to sustain a counterintelligence investigation of Flynn in the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing.

The Justice Department says the notes were written between Jan. 3-5, 2017, the very weekend the FBI agent who had investigated Flynn’s ties to Russia for five months recommended the case be closed because there was “no derogatory” evidence that he committed a crime or posed a counterintelligence threat. FBI supervisors overruled the agent’s recommendation.”

“Sidney Powell, Flynn’s lawyer, laid out the potential ramifications of the notes in a court filing on Wednesday, calling the new evidence “stunning and exculpatory.”

“Mr. Obama himself directed that ‘the right people’ investigate General Flynn. This caused former FBI Director Comey to acknowledge the obvious: General Flynn’s phone calls with Ambassador Kislyak ‘appear legit,’” Powell argued in her new motion.

“According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act. That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn,” she added.”

Read more:

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/strzoks-newly-discovered-fbi-notes-deliver-sensational

Strzok Notes:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.231.1_1.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

35 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Biden, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, FBI, Obama, Obama administration, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama lies, Obama records, The Case Against Barack Obama, US Department of Justice

Tagged ,

Kevin Shipp CIA Deep State Shadow Government whistleblower warning, Hillary Brennan et al fear Trump win prosecution, Voter fraud coming

Posted on January 13, 2020 | 7 comments

Kevin Shipp CIA Deep State Shadow Government whistleblower warning, Hillary Brennan et al fear Trump win prosecution, Voter fraud coming

“Mark Zaid, the John Podesta, Clinton and Schumer-linked attorney who founded the anti-Trump nonprofit ‘Whistleblower Aid’ in 2017, tweeted “It’s very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.”…Zero Hedge Nov 7, 2019

“Judicial Watch Finds Millions of ‘Extra’ Registrants on Voting Rolls – Warns California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Colorado, Virginia to Clean Up Voting Rolls or Face a Federal Lawsuit”…Jan 2, 2020

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

 

From Greg Hunter at USA Watchdog.

“Shipp is also an expert on the Deep State Shadow Government. Shipp says things are “quiet” on the prosecution of the failed coup plotters who tried to remove President Trump, but ‘that is a good thing.’ Shipp says, “The evidence is already there to pass an indictment on Hillary Clinton and some of the others. So, there is not even an investigation in that regard. . . . Barr’s investigation is now a criminal investigation. They are trying to get a hold of Brennan’s (former CIA Director) emails and correspondence, through subpoenas, during this soft coup, and it looks like they are in the middle of that now, so, hence the silence. They are quiet now and that is a frustrating thing about any investigation. . . .They can’t come out and reveal where they are heading, especially when it comes to the CIA and intelligence agencies. You can’t tip your hand to the person you are investigating. Then they start destroying documents, and people start getting afraid and start covering things up.”

Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”

Shipp says the Deep State is worried that Trump will have a second term. Shipp says, “I think they (Deep State) are in a state of shock. They want to get rid of Trump because for the first time in their careers, they can be prosecuted for what they have done. I think they are afraid of that, and that’s why John Brennan and others are coming out as mocking birds on CNN and MSNBC and constantly attacking the President.””

Read more:

https://usawatchdog.com/iranian-sleeper-cells-will-attack-america-kevin-shipp/

From Kevin Shipp.

“There are three defining issues that reveal whether the Deep State has been exposed and is being deconstructed: The Hillary Clinton email and Clinton Foundation DOJ investigations, the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the DOJ investigation into the Russia collusion hoax. It now appears the DOJ is shutting down the Clinton investigation, with no indictment and the Epstein trafficking/espionage/blackmail investigation is going nowhere. So far, none of the dirty cops and intelligence officials that engaged in sedition against a sitting president have been indicted. This is a defining moment and a wake-up call to Constitution loving Americans.”

Bio.

“His assignments included protective agent for the Director of the CIA, counterintelligence investigator searching for moles inside the CIA, overseas counter terrorism operations officer, internal security investigator, assistant team leader for the antiterrorism tactical assault team, chief of training for the CIA federal police force and polygraph examiner. Mr. Shipp was the senior program manager for the Department of State, Diplomatic Security, Anti-Terrorism Assistance global police training program. He is the recipient of two CIA Meritorious Unit Citations, three Exceptional Performance Awards and a Medallion for high risk overseas operations. He holds a master’s degree in forensic psychopysiology. Mr. Shipp is the author of the best-selling book, From the Company of Shadows – an expose’ on CIA operations and the abuse of government secrecy.  Mr. Shipp has come out to expose what he calls, “The Shadow Government,” the massive system of secrecy and corruption that controls the elected US government behind the scenes. His speeches have received standing ovations.”

Read more:

https://www.fortheloveoffreedom.net/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

7 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, CIA, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Clintons, FBI, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Obama administration, Obama indictment, Obama lies, The Case Against Barack Obama, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Robert Creamer visited the White House 342 times since 2009, Engineered violence at Trump rallies and voter fraud, James O’Keefe Project Veritas videos feature Creamer, Met with Obama 47 times, Obama derides Trump for mentioning voter fraud

Posted on October 19, 2016 | 25 comments

Robert Creamer visited the White House 342 times since 2009, Engineered violence at Trump rallies and voter fraud, James O’Keefe Project Veritas videos feature Creamer, Met with Obama 47 times, Obama derides Trump for mentioning voter fraud

“Concerns about high voter turnout and the inability of the precincts to adequately handle the number of participants and monitor the election process are rampant.   On the night of the caucus itself, the Clinton Campaign brought many instances of these irregularities to the attention of the State Party. The
campaign received in excess of 2,000 complaints of rules violations, indicating widespread violations of the Party’s rules”…Dr. Lynette Long, March 4, 2008, Texas Democratic Primary

“It doesn’t matter what the friggin legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf**cker”…Scott Foval, Project Veritas video

“We control life, Winston, at all its levels. You are imagining that there is something called human nature which will be outraged by what we do and will turn against us. But we create human nature. Men are infinitely malleable.”…George Orwell, “1984″

 

 

From The Daily Caller October 18, 2016.

“Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally Agitators Visited White House 342 Times

A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at Donald Trump’s rallies has visited the White House 342 times since 2009, White House records show.

Robert Creamer, who acted as a middle man between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and “protesters” who tried — and succeeded — to provoke violence at Trump rallies met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records. Creamer’s last visit was in June 2016.

Creamer, whose White House visits were first pointed out by conservative blog Weasel Zippers, is stepping back from his role within the Clinton campaign. (RELATED: Second O’Keefe Video Shows Dem Operative Boasting About Voter Fraud)

Hidden camera video from activist James O’Keefe showed Creamer bragging that his role within the Clinton campaign was to oversee the work of Americans United for Change, a non-profit organization that sent activists to Trump rallies. (RELATED: Activist Who Took Credit For Violent Chicago Protests Was On Hillary’s Payroll)

Scott Foval, the national field director for Americans United for Change, explained how the scheme works.

“The [Clinton] campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, The Foval Group goes and executes the shit,” Foval told an undercover journalist.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/

James O’Keefe Project Verita videos.

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

25 Comments

Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, Community Organizer, Obama, Obama administration, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, The Case Against Barack Obama, white house

Tagged , , , ,

Blagojevich US Supreme Court appeal opposition brief filed by Solicitor General, Donald B. Verrilli Jr. former Obama Deputy Counsel, Brief filed Feb 19 but does not show up on site, Fox guarding the hen house

Posted on February 23, 2016 | 167 comments

Blagojevich US Supreme Court appeal opposition brief filed by Solicitor General, Donald B. Verrilli Jr. former Obama Deputy Counsel, Brief filed Feb 19 but does not show up on site, Fox guarding the hen house

Why did Patrick Fitzgerald and the US Justice Department wait until December 2008 to arrest Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich

“Regardless of how this plays out, it benefits Obama. If there is no appeal or the appeal is denied, Blagojevich will be sequestered. If the appeal proceeds, it could drag out beyond impacting the 2012 election cycle. The intent is obvious.”…Citizen Wells, July 19, 2011

 

 

More mysterious goin ons in the Rod Blagojevich prosecution and incarceration.

I don’t expect efficiency or accountability from government.

I see it on the local and national level.

If you follow Citizen Wells, you know that we follow closely the Blagojevich cases.

Friday, February 19, 2016 was the extended deadline for a response.

There was none listed on Friday or over the weekend.

Just checked this morning and found:

No. 15-664
Title:
Rod Blagojevich, Petitioner
v.
United States
Docketed: November 19, 2015
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
  Case Nos.: (11-3853)
  Decision Date: July 21, 2015
  Rehearing Denied: August 19, 2015

 

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 17 2015 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2015)
Dec 16 2015 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 20, 2016.
Dec 21 2015 Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Elected Officials, et al. filed.
Jan 7 2016 Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 19, 2016.
Feb 19 2016 Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

The brief is no where to be found.

http://www.justice.gov/osg/supreme-court-briefs

By the way, the US Solicitor General is Donald B. Verrilli Jr. former Obama Deputy Counsel.

Think that might be a problem?

The fox guarding the hen house.

167 Comments

Posted in Barack Obama, Blagojevich, Blagojevich trial, Chicago, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, corruption, Obama, Obama administration, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Pay to play politics, Supreme Court, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

NH voters cast vote for ineligible candidate Cruz?, New Hampshire ballot commission rejected efforts to remove Ted Cruz, Law of eligibility murky, Neither US Supreme Court nor any authority has explicitly ruled on natural born citizen

Posted on February 9, 2016 | 95 comments

NH voters cast vote for ineligible candidate Cruz?, New Hampshire ballot commission rejected efforts to remove Ted Cruz, Law of eligibility murky, Neither US Supreme Court nor any authority has explicitly ruled on natural born citizen

“To his kind of judge, Cruz ironically wouldn’t be eligible, because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and ’90s required that someone actually be born on US soil to be a “natural born” citizen. Even having two US parents wouldn’t suffice. And having just an American mother, as Cruz did, would have been insufficient at a time that made patrilineal descent decisive.”…Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard Law Professor

“Ted Cruz wrote the forward for U.S. Constitution for Dummies which clearly reveals that he is not a natural born citizen.”…IL ballot challenger Bill Graham

“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND

 

 

Two state ballot entities recently ruled on Ted Cruz remaining on their ballots.

The Illinois state board of elections ruled that Ted Cruz is eligible as a natural born citizen.  IL is consistently listed as one of the most corrupt states in the US and the home of Obama, another non natural born citizen.

No surprise.

The New Hampshire ballot commission took a more honest approach.

“If there is a clear ruling on some issues that somebody clearly doesn’t meet, we would apply it. If there is a constitutional uncertainty about the meaning of something – which from my research and from all the stuff that was thrown at us at the commission there certainly is about the natural born citizen thing — we don’t undertake to make that decision,”

I was disappointed to find what I consider to be the most inaccurate article I have uncovered at American Thinker, February 5, 2016.

“Illinois and New Hampshire Agree Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen”

“Trump persists that Cruz’s citizenship is still an open question. It is not, and the election boards of two states, New Hampshire and Illinois, have now ruled, in response to complaints, that Sen. Ted Cruz is indeed, under the laws and Constitution of the United States, a “natural born citizen” fully eligible to be President of the United States. As the Washington Examiner reported:”

“A ballot commission in New Hampshire also ruled in favor of Cruz in January, but the language in Monday’s decision by the Illinois board took a stronger tone than the previous ruling, warning other skeptics, “Further discussion on this issue is unnecessary.””

“Indeed, it is unnecessary. The question of Cruz’s citizenship has been asked and answered. Is Trump saying that a baby born in Paris to a vacationing American family is not eligible to run for president and must be “naturalized” like some illegal alien from Guadalajara?

Some noted legal scholars would beg to differ from Trump’s concern that Cruz is not in fact a “natural born” citizen.

Jonathan Adler, who teaches courses in constitutional, administrative, and environmental law at Case Western University School of Law, writes in the Washington Post:

Ted Cruz was born in Canada. His mother was a U.S. citizen. His father, a Cuban, was not. Under U.S. law, the fact that Cruz was born to a U.S. citizen mother makes him a citizen from birth. In other words, he is a “natural born citizen” (as opposed to a naturalized citizen) and is constitutionally eligible.”

“Also agreeing with Cruz’s eligibility are two constitutional scholars who have argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. As the Washington Post reported:

Writing in the Harvard Law Review, two former top Supreme Court litigators, Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, said: “All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase ‘natural born Citizen’ has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.”

“Now two state boards of election have certified Cruz’s eligibility, which is beyond dispute, no matter how much Trump whines, pouts, and throws out groundless accusations.”

Read more:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/illinois_and_new_hampshire_agree_cruz_is_a_natural_born_citizen.html

Aside from being wrong on the definition of natural born citizen, this article is blatantly inaccurate:

New Hampshire did not rule that Cruz is a natural born citizen.

It omitted the opinion of constitutional expert Laurence Tribe of Harvard:

“Cruz says this is all settled law, but Harvard’s Laurence Tribe disagrees.

“It clearly is not settled law,” Tribe said in recent an interview.”

“That’s because Tribe says Cruz is a constitutional “originalist,” who believes the document should be followed to the letter. Tribe says jurists who share such a view might well conclude that Cruz is not eligible to be president — because he was not born in America.

According to Tribe, this shows that Cruz is trying to have it both ways.”

http://www.wbur.org/2016/01/15/donald-trump-ted-cruz-laurence-tribe-citizenship

From The Dallas Morning News November 24, 2015.

“The New Hampshire ballot commission today rejected efforts to kick Canada-born Sen. Ted Cruz off the primary ballot based on his birth outside the United States.

That clears a key legal and political obstacle as the Texas Republican seeks the GOP nomination for president. But it’s not a clear win on the question of eligibility.

Rather, the panel found that with the law of eligibility so murky, it can’t second-guess the senator’s own claims that he passes constitutional muster. Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor any other authority has explicitly ruled that someone like Cruz — born on foreign soil, with one American parent – can or cannot be president.

“It would be really nice if somebody would get this issue of law decided who has authority to decide constitutional issues, so every four years we don’t have this come up again,” said Manchester attorney Brad Cook, a Republican who chairs the 5-member New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission.”

Read more:

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/11/regardless-of-canadian-birth-ted-cruz-survives-ballot-challenge-in-new-hampshire.html/

AMERICAN THINKER OWES THE PUBLIC AN APOLOGY.

95 Comments

Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Election, Election 2016, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electors, Eligibility, Harvard, Illinois, Natural born citizen, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, The Case Against Barack Obama, US Constitution

Tagged , , ,

Market Watch reports white people have least confidence in the American Dream, Market Watch and media lie about job growth, White american employment decimated under Obama, Who is getting all those “jobs”?

Posted on January 23, 2016 | 53 comments

Market Watch reports white people have least confidence in the American Dream, Market Watch and media lie about job growth, White american employment decimated under Obama, Who is getting all those “jobs”?

“In December 2014 there were 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country who had arrived since January 2000. But job growth over this period was just 9.3 million — half of new immigration.”…Center for Immigration Studies February 2015

“There’s no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.”…Gallup CEO Jim Clifton 

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

 

The mainstream media has reported about hunger in America but they won’t tell you why.

That is because their priority is to protect Obama and now the next Democrat presidential candidate.

The Obama economy and real employment situation in the US is the cause of hunger.

And white americans have been hit the hardest.

From Market Watch January 22, 2016.

“White people have least confidence in the American Dream”

“Americans say the American Dream is suffering — and that our laziness and low morals may be partially to blame.

Searches for “American Dream” have fallen 24% since Google began tracking this data in 2004 — and when you type “American Dream” into Google, three of the four top autofills are “dead,” “a lie” and “leaving America,” according to an analysis of Google Trends data released Friday in a report by brokerage firm Convergex.”

“Furthermore, three in four Americans now say that the “American Dream” — broadly, the notion that through hard work and determination every American can have a successful life — is suffering, according to the 7th Annual American Values Survey unveiled last year at the Aspen Ideas Festival.

What’s more, 69% say the obstacles to realizing the dream are “more severe today than ever” — and note that a decline in work ethic is the primary hurdle to Dream achievement. The poll of more than 2,300 Americans was conducted by Burson-Marsteller and market research firm Penn Schoen Berland.”

Read more:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/white-people-think-the-american-dream-is-least-achievable-2015-07-02

From Market Watch January 13, 2016.

“So many jobs, so little growth. What gives?”

“Three possible explanations for robust hiring, weak GDP

The U.S. economy just witnessed the two best years of job growth — 2014 and 2015, in that order — since 1999. Yet real economic growth has been bumping along at a 2.1% rate since the Great Recession ended.

The 79-month expansion included two quarterly contractions in gross domestic product, which is already unusual. The economy never exhibited any real thrust coming out of the long and deep recession. Even economists have begun to despair, abandoning their perennial 3%-growth-next-year forecast for something with a 2% handle.

Yet the mystery of consistently strong job growth in the face of consistently weak economic growth remains. The possible answers to the conundrum can be divided into three categories:
1. Productivity growth is lousy.

2. GDP growth is being understated.

3. Job growth is being overstated.”

“Could the employment data be skewed? Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research, brought to my attention a recent redesign of the one-page enrollment package the BLS mails to potential participants in its payroll survey and suggested the 2012 change might be biasing the responses.

Even if there were any bias in the data, it would be washed away by annual benchmark revisions. Those revisions incorporate information from the state unemployment insurance tax records that nearly all firms are required to file.”

Read more:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/so-many-jobs-so-little-growth-what-gives-2016-01-13?link=MW_home_latest_news

“So many jobs”

“robust hiring”

For who?

It is hard to believe that the folks writing this crap for the mainstream media are so stupid, ignorant or out of touch with reality.

So we are left with Orwellian brainwashing and bias.

Citizen Wells has written extensively on the impact on white american employment under Obama. Do a search on this site to read them.

Here are a couple of facts from the US Labor Dept.:

White american employment.

From January to December 2015.

Employment gain: 276,000. (that is supposedly one month’s jobs added)

Labor force participation rate down .5 %.

Not in labor force up 1,415,000

Where is Donald Trump on this?

 


							

	
			

				
53 Comments

													

						Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Economy, Employment, Financial crisis, Lies, media, Obama, Obama administration, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, Orwellian, The Case Against Barack Obama, Unemployment					

								
Tagged , , , 
							

		


		
	


			

			
Harvard Law Review article lied about Ted Cruz eligibility, Natural born citizen status, 2 US citizen parents required, Cruz born in canada to 1 US Citizen parent his mother, Is this why Obama and Cruz are arrogant in regard to US Constitution?


			

				Posted on January 3, 2016 | 34 comments
			


				

				
Harvard Law Review article lied about Ted Cruz eligibility, Natural born citizen status, 2 US citizen parents required, Cruz born in canada to 1 US Citizen parent his mother, Is this why Obama and Cruz are arrogant in regard to US Constitution?


“According to the  US Citizenship and Immigration Services Ted Cruz was not a US citizen at birth and consequently not a natural born citizen.”…Citizen Wells


“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln


“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells


 


 


At the time of the adoption of the US Constitution in 1787, there were only 2 types of citizens defined by US Law.


Natural born citizens and everyone else, citizens. There were no legally naturalized citizens and no provision in US Law to be naturalized until 1790.


That is why the founding fathers has to be grandfathered in with the following language:


“no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”


That language and the meaning of natural born citizen have not been altered.


Only the definition of citizen and how to attain citizenship has been altered.


It is believed by myself and many legal scholars that the founding fathers knew that one had to be born on US Soil to US citizen parents (plural).


Three years later in the Naturalization act of 1790 we find a clarification:


“And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens”


Obviously from that language one had to have US citizen parents (plural) to be a natural born citizen.


Senate Resolution 511, that Barack Obama signed, stated:


“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”


Once again citizens (plural).


So from start to finish we have the requirement of 2 US Citizen parents to be a natural born citizen.


Ted Cruz had only one US Citizen parent, his mother and he was born in Canada.


Clearly not eligible.


That is why the following article from the Harvard Review is so absurd.


“We have both had the privilege of heading the Office of the Solicitor General during different administrations. We may have different ideas about the ideal candidate in the next presidential election, but we agree on one important principle: voters should be able to choose from all constitutionally eligible candidates, free from spurious arguments that a U.S. citizen at birth is somehow not constitutionally eligible to serve as President simply because he was delivered at a hospital abroad.


The Constitution directly addresses the minimum qualifications necessary to serve as President. In addition to requiring thirty-five years of age and fourteen years of residency, the Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.”


All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.”


This is a big lie!


http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/


From Citizen Wells March 16, 2015.


Truths, half truths and lies.


I will make this simple because it is.


Although our laws were derived from British laws and in fact some common laws are in force today, we have heavily modified them beginning with pre revolution colonial laws and the US Constitution.


The article above conveniently, selectively quotes the US Constitution which states:


“no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”


Ted Cruz is a citizen, but since he was not alive at the adoption of the Constitution, he is not by default a natural born citizen.


The Constitution was crafted by individuals with an excellent understanding of the law and a concern for foreign influences.


They made a clear distinction between citizen and natural born citizen.


Ted Cruz citizen not natural born citizen, Cruz not alive at adoption of constitution, Harvard Law Review article, Still teach to constitution?, Citizen at birth not equivalent to natural born citizen




Attorney Mario Apuzzo provides a scholarly explanation.


“I read the March 11, 2015 article entitled, “On the Meaning of a ‘Natural Born Citizen,” written by Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, found at 128 Harv.L.Rev.F 161, and accessed at http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/ .  The first sentence of the article says:  “We have both had the privilege of heading the Office of the Solicitor General.”  The article repeats the existing talking points offered in support of the constitutional eligibility of Senator Ted Cruz (all born citizens are natural born citizens) and offers nothing new.  Mr. Cruz was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen (Cuban) father.  I have written a recent article in which I conclude that Mr. Cruz is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President because he does not satisfy the one and only common law definition of a natural born citizen confirmed by the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), which is a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth.  The article is entitled, “What Do President Obama and Senator Cruz Have In Common? They Are Both Not Natural Born Citizens,” accessed at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-do-president-obama-and-senator.html .  Katyal and Clement maintain that any child who becomes a citizen at birth, regardless of where born or by what means, is a natural born citizen.  They add that since Mr. Cruz became a citizen from the moment of birth and did not need any naturalization after birth he is a natural born citizen.  But there is no historical and legal evidence which demonstrates that this is how the Framers defined a natural born citizen and the authors surely have not presented that evidence even if it did exist.


The authors’ argument suffers from the fallacy of bald assertion.  They provide no convincing evidence for their position on who is included as an Article II natural born citizen.  They do not examine what was the source of the Framers’ definition of an Article II natural born citizen, let alone what was the definition of a natural born citizen when the Framers drafted and adopted the Constitution and when it was eventually ratified.  They ignore so much of the historical and legal record in coming to their bald conclusions. For a discussion of this historical and legal evidence, see the numerous articles that I have written and posted at my blog, http://puzo1.blogspot.com .

Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/03/attorney-responds-to-harvard-law-review.html#8Lt4afwlA9IQXYvW.99


Read more:


http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/03/attorney-responds-to-harvard-law-review.html


 


 


 

							

	
			

				
34 Comments

													

						Posted in Barack Obama, Birth Certificate, Citizen, Citizen Journalism, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Election, Election 2016, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Founding Fathers, Lies, Natural born citizen, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, The Case Against Barack Obama, US Constitution					

								
Tagged , , , , 
							

		


		
	


			

			
Ted Cruz Rubio and Jindal eligibility challenged in Vermont, H. Brooke Paige complaint filed December 9, 2015, Natural born citizen status requires US birth and 2 citizen parents, Attorney Mario Apuzzo explains founding fathers intent


			

				Posted on December 30, 2015 | 40 comments
			


				

				
Ted Cruz Rubio and Jindal eligibility challenged in Vermont, H. Brooke Paige complaint filed December 9, 2015, Natural born citizen status requires US birth and 2 citizen parents, Attorney Mario Apuzzo explains founding fathers intent


“According to the  US Citizenship and Immigration Services Ted Cruz was not a US citizen at birth and consequently not a natural born citizen.”…Citizen Wells


“no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”…US Constitution


“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells


 


 


I agree with H. Brooke Paige, CDR Charles Kerchner, Attorney Mario Apuzzo and many others that the the founding fathers understood the definition of natural born citizen meant birth on US soil to 2 US citizen parents.


Yesterday Mr. Paige presented Citizen Wells with a complaint filed against the State of Vermont, Secretary of State James Condos and Attorney General William Sorrell.




Here are some exerpts:


“10. While it may seem counterintuitive that such a weighty question as

that of the definition of the constitutional meaning of a presidential

qualification and the other questions raised in this action, should

originate in a state superior court – it is not only entirely

appropriate, it is an absolute necessity as no other authority or

jurisdiction is available to the Plaintiff and is the most logical,

constitutionally permissible jurisdiction in light of the federal

Constitution’s protections of the coequal branches of the federal

government and the principle of Separation of Powers embodied in said

Constitution of the United States (1790).


11. In 2008, Dr. Daniel Tokaji, Professor of Law at Ohio State

University, explained this essential legal pathway in his “The

Justiciability of Eligibility: May Courts Decide Who Can Be President?”

(Exhibit D) which, after extensive analysis of question relating to the

constitutional qualification cases relating to Senator John McCain of

Arizona and then Senator Barack Hussein Obama of Illinois, concluded:


“(F)ederal lawsuits challenging the presidential candidates’ eligibility

to serve as president are not justiciable, and it is questionable whether

any justiciable case could be brought in federal court as an initial

matter. Fortunately, there are alternative means to adjudicate this matter

that are consistent with the U.S. Constitution. The most promising is a

pre-election state-court lawsuit seeking to keep an allegedly unqualified

candidate off the ballot. In the event that a renegade state court rejects

a candidate who is, in fact, eligible or that two or more state courts

reach conflicting conclusions on a candidate’s eligibility, U.S. Supreme

Court review should be available as a backstop. This avenue seems less

fraught with peril than congressional resolution of the matter, given

Congress’ dubious legal authority to not count electoral votes of a

candidate it believes ineligible. Those who seek to challenge a

presidential candidate’s eligibility would thus be well-advised to dust

off their state election codes and head to state court.”


“14. In the prior action the Defendants’ council, Attorney General Sorrell

through his assistant Todd Daloz,  attempted to obfuscate and confound

both the Plaintiff and the Court  with the issues of “ripeness” and

“mootness” of the issues raised. First arguing that the answers sought

could not be raised until AFTER the election had been conducted – a

tortured interpretation of 17 V.S.A. § 2732 and shortly thereafter, with

equal absurdity, arguing that the issues had become moot with the passage

of time.”


“22. In the 2016 Presidential Election, in addition to Socialist Party

candidates Lindsay and Osorio, who have vowed to run in every election

regardless of their constitutional qualification debility; three of the

Republican Party candidates are known to have birth circumstances that

preclude their qualifying for the office they are seeking.

(a) – Texas U.S. Senator, Rafael Edward (Ted) Cruz, was born in Calgary,

Alberta, Canada, to a Cuban citizen father, Rafael, who became a

naturalized U.S. citizen in 2005, long after his son’s birth.

(b) – Louisiana Governor, Piyush (Bobby) Jindal, was born in Baton Rouge,

LA to Indian nationals who had recently arrived in the U.S. on visas at

the time of their son’s birth. His father, Amar, was in the U.S. on a P3-1

professional work visa while his mother, Raj, was in the U.S. on a student

visa: neither was a U.S. citizen at the time of their son’s birth. (c) –

Florida U.S. Senator, Marco Antonio Rubio, was born in Miami, FL to two

Cuban nationals who came to the U.S. before Castro came to power. Mario

Rubio Reina and Oriales (Garcia) Rubio left Cuba in 1956 and continuously

resided in Miami, however they did not become naturalized citizens until

1975, when Marco was already four years old.


None of the above mentioned candidates meet the “natural born Citizen”

qualification set forth in the U. S. Constitution for serving as President

of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Military. Mario Apuzzo,

Esq. has written a dissertation delineating the debilities of each of

these candidates which bars their serving:  “Senator Cruz, Senator Rubio,

and Governor Jindal Should Not Be Allowed to Participate…(2015)”  (Exhibit

H).”


Exhibits:




Some legal scholars maintain that being a citizen at birth qualifies as being a natural born citizen.


Even by that standard, according to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Cruz is not a natural born citizen.


https://citizenwells.com/2015/12/14/ted-cruz-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-and-not-eligible-for-presidency-not-a-citizen-at-birth-not-born-after-november-14-1986-media-and-democrats-are-waiting-to-challenge-cruz-ted-cruz-must-reque/


Obviously, the US Supreme Court needs to do their duty and settle this matter once and for all, irrespective of the impact on Barack Obama.


 

							

	
			

				
40 Comments

													

						Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Election, Election 2016, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Eligibility, Founding Fathers, Natural born citizen, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, The Case Against Barack Obama, Vermont					

								
Tagged , , , , 
							

		


		
	


			

			
Blagojevich update US Supreme Court appeal, December 19, 2015, Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 20, 2016, Not denied yet significant?


			

				Posted on December 19, 2015 | 84 comments
			


				

				
Blagojevich update US Supreme Court appeal, December 19, 2015, Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 20, 2016, Not denied yet significant?


Why did Patrick Fitzgerald and the US Justice Department wait until December 2008 to arrest Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells


“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich


“Regardless of how this plays out, it benefits Obama. If there is no appeal or the appeal is denied, Blagojevich will be sequestered. If the appeal proceeds, it could drag out beyond impacting the 2012 election cycle. The intent is obvious.”…Citizen Wells, July 19, 2011


 


Rod Blagojevich attorney Len Goodman filed an appeal, petition for a writ of certiorari, with the US Supreme Court on November 17, 2015.


The SCOTUS then had a response indicated by December 21, 2015.






No. 15-664





Title:






Rod Blagojevich, Petitioner




v.




United States










Docketed:
November 19, 2015




Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit










  Case Nos.:
(11-3853)




  Decision Date:
July 21, 2015




  Rehearing Denied:
August 19, 2015






 






~~~Date~~~
~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Nov 17 2015
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2015)






This response has been extended to January 20, 2016.


http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/15-664.htm


The Blagojevich appeal has not been denied yet.


Is this significant?


Here are some cases that have been denied.


Click to access 121415zor_8n59.pdf


 

							

	
			

				
84 Comments

													

						Posted in Barack Obama, Blagojevich, Blagojevich trial, Chicago, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Illinois, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, Pay to play politics, Rezko, The Case Against Barack Obama, Tony Rezko, U.S. Supreme Court					

								
Tagged , , , , ,