Category Archives: Attorney General

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson) Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021, Michigan forensic audits revealed “algorithm used to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections”

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson) Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021, Michigan forensic audits revealed “algorithm used to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections”

“AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.””...Summit News Nov 13, 2020

“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG

“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”…Antrim County audit report

From the Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson)

“Plaintiff’s investigative team has uncovered the algorithm, a sixth degree polynomial, used in Michigan.

To be clear, at least four (4) of the so-called battleground states have implemented an algorithm to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections. These algorithms are unique to each particular state. In other words, the algorithm used in Michigan does not work across the board in Ohio.”

“But make no mistake, they are each determined at the state level to shift votes based on the particular and peculiar demographics of each state.”

Read more:

More documents from Attorney DePerno website.

https://www.depernolaw.com/bailey-documents.html

From Citizen Wells February 2, 2021.

“A Michigan 13th Circuit Court chief judge has extended a deadline for the secretary of state to turn over records in a lawsuit filed by an Antrim County voter.

Judge Kevin Elsenheimer’s written order was filed on Friday, Jan. 29, with a Feb. 2 deadline for the records to be turned over. The judge has since issued an extension allowing Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson until Feb. 8 to submit the documents.

The Antrim County lawsuit is scheduled for a settlement conference on May 11 and, if necessary, a non-jury trial two-day bench trial is scheduled to begin June 8.

The judge approved a motion for discovery, ordering the secretary of state to produce information requested from Portage-based Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno, who is representing plaintiff William Bailey in Bailey versus Antrim County.”

Anti Trumper MI Attorney General Dana Nessel

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case Staci Burk v Doug Ducey Governor petition for Writ of Certiorari, Ducy waiver filed April 8, 2021, “constitutional claims of vote denial”

Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case Staci Burk v Doug Ducey Governor petition for Writ of Certiorari, Ducy waiver filed April 8, 2021, “constitutional claims of vote denial”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

In

Staci Burk v Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al.

Waiver of Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona

filed April, 8, 2021.

From the petition of Staci Burk.

  1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate Petitioner’s right to Equal Protection
    when it denied remand for an evidentiary hearing of Petitioner’s
    constitutional claims of vote denial through the cancellation of her
    registration, while registrations of unqualified people remained, and those
    votes were counted?
  2. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate stare decisis because its 2021 opinion
    contradicted its 2010 opinion involving the same Petitioner regarding
    whether she met the definition of “elector” to bring an election challenge,
    even though neither her voter registration status nor the statutory definition
    of “elector” had changed?
  3. Did the court clerk’s admittedly improper rejection ofPetitioner’s verification
    filed on December 7, 2020, constitute plain error?
  4. Did the Court violate Petitioner’s First Amendment rights to petition for
    redress and Due Process by considering her illegally cancelled voter
    registration where she had not been given an opportunity for an evidentiary
    hearing to present evidence regarding her attempts to reinstate it?”

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona election audit update March 8, 2021, Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse, “What about ballots that were shredded in the trash?”

Arizona election audit update March 8, 2021, Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse, “What about ballots that were shredded in the trash?”

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse

From the comments:

J.W.
Let’s talk about the shredded ballots in the dumpster,right outside of the bay doors.

102

Mary Schindler
What about ballots that were shredded in the trash? Your state is corrupt and arrests need to be made ASAP!

302

DaveCaresForYou
Shucks they should have looked in trash to see of ballots were out there or to see if it looked the same as photos

93

Peanut Butter
Yet y’all made no comments about the ballots found in the trash

94

VoodooCrab
Is that the guy who got yelled at during the citizen’s meeting? Yeah, I do not trust this guy! He’s too eager to please the Senate and listen to him spout off about security.

 

Patriot Attorney David Clements provides interesting insights.

AZ Audit Discussion and thoughts on Jovan Hutton Pulitzer!

Dr. Lyle Rapacki talks with Shelby B. and Steve Robinson about the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, the forensic audit, and the shredded ballots that were found in a dumpster this last weekend.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

From Attorney Lin Wood on Telegram

“As I have earlier made clear, I found the whistleblower interview regarding Chief Justice Roberts, former Vice President Pence and other high ranking officials to be credible.

Given the seriousness of his statements, I made the transcript public and also provided the thumb drive to the United States Secret Service, the State Bar of Georgia, the Lawyers Club of Atlanta President and members of its Executive Committee, Mercer Law School, Mercer Law School Dean Cathy Cox, and the District Court of Colorado Bar.

Are the allegations of the whistleblower being investigated?

With the exception of the Secret Service, all of the other recipients of the whistleblower interview have to my knowledge done nothing except to falsely smear me.

I was just the messenger. I only did what I felt was my duty as a law-abiding citizen, lawyer, and officer of the court. And for that, members of the legal profession seek to destroy me.

I think you understand exactly what is going on here. I do.”

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explains why Lin Wood’s whistleblower is absolutely credible

FROM A LIN WOOD WHISTLEBLOWER TESTIMONY TRANSCRIBED MARCH 1, 2021.

· “I started providing this in 2005, and in 2008 I
13· started working directly with Rod Rosenstein in Baltimore,
14· and because of the access with the other agencies, the FBI,
15· for instance, would come for corroboration of something they
16· were working on, or just to ask questions, if I’d seen
17· something like this, if this related to anything.· Then it
18· grew from there.
19· · · · · · Because of the undercover nature of many of the
20· investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism
21· within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and
22· access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod
23· Rosenstein.”

· “INTERVIEWEE:· · · · That group, I mean, they’re all
13· interconnected one way or another.· That particular group was
14· Rod, VP Pence, Paul Ryan.· That was the core of that group.
15· Rod was in there, but that was the core of it.· It was an
16· attempt, where Rod was the brilliant legal mind behind it, to
17· remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment.”

“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts — a lot
24· of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as
25· favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people.
·2· · · · · · We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief
·3· Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but
·4· it was also — Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type
·5· to various agencies around the world.· They used his
·6· information.· They exploited it for their own good.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/05/lin-wood-whistleblower-transcripts-transcribed-mar-1-2021-re-justice-roberts-mike-pence-rod-rosenstein-et-al-ref-in-feb-9-us-district-court-affidavit/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures. In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.  Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.”…Citizen Wells

 

Oral arguments were presented today before the US Supreme Court, March 2, 2021 in

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

Listen here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/19-1257

Read Transcript:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2020/19-1257_d1o2.pdf

More on the case here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/02/arizona-ag-brnovich-scotus-case-importance-in-oral-hearing-today-tue-march-2-2021-ga-folded-to-abrams-dnc-demands-and-az-fighting-to-maintain-election-laws/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

This should be an open and closed case.

The procedures being questioned follow those of most states.

By the Constitution, the states have control over election procedures.

High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures.

In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.

Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.

Hence today’s hearing.

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in Texas v PA GA MI WI, Dec 9, 2020.

“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in the AZ Senate Maricopa County case Dec 30, 2020.

“The Arizona Legislature has broad authority to investigate the County’s
administration of the 2020 general election to determine whether Arizona law regarding election administration should remain the same or be changed. In resolving this matter, the Court should (1) recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad authority to issue legislative subpoenas, (2) exercise deferential review of the subpoenas at issue, (3) hold that the presiding officer of either house or the chairman of any committee have the authority to issue subpoenas reviewing the County’s administration of elections, and (4) reject any effort by the County to interpose separation of powers concerns.”

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Maricopa%20County%20v%20Fann_%20AGO%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

From the Brnovich Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

Why did the Supreme Court take this case?

It goes to the core of the constitution and states rights to administer elections.

Secondly, AG Brnovich is on defense, not offense.

 

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

From Prescotte Enews March 1, 2021

“The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will review a case challenging Arizona’s election integrity laws concerning ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting.

In 2016, Arizona passed HB 2023 to restrict ballot harvesting in Arizona unless the person collecting the ballot is a family member, a person living in the same household, or a caregiver. Since the 1970s, Arizona has required people to vote at their specific precinct.

General Brnovich intervened on behalf of Arizona after the Secretary of State refused to defend the measures.

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is asking SCOTUS to bring clarity to these matters after a misguided ruling by the Ninth Circuit struck the measures down.”

Read more:

https://prescottenews.com/index.php/2021/03/01/ballot-harvesting-brnovich-v-dnc/

Us Supreme Court

TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021
CASES FOR ARGUMENT TODAY

Tuesday, March 2
(2)
BRNOVICH V. DNC
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
V. DNC
(Consolidated – 1 hr. for argument)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalFebruary2021.pdf

No. 19-1257
Vide 19-1258

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From Granite Grok February 26, 2021.

“Many across America and as far away as Australia (go to 12:07), are aware of the “Windham Incident” – NH’s blatant disregard for election integrity.

The disturbing debacle was created by Gov. Sununu, his Attorney General and Secretary of State (SOS) due to their lack of a meaningful investigation into the disturbing and questionable results produced by Windham’s voting machines.”

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.”  Those errors were for only one race.  We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste

 

Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From GateWay Pundit February 26, 2021

“After Public Pressure New Hampshire AG’s Office Rescinds Plan to Move Voting Machines to State Capitol for Investigation”

“In the lead-up to the planned House vote this week, the AGs office, in a surprise move Monday, notified the town of Windham of their intent to take possession of the 4 voting machines, owned by the town and its citizens, even before the legislative process had been completed.  The bill hasn’t passed and therefore is not even ready for signature by the Governor.  Why is the AG suddenly so anxious to take possession of these machines?  After the change in the scheduled vote and swift public outcry to this planned removal of the machines, the AGs office rescinded this notice yesterday.  

As this audit is being done to reassure the citizens of Windham that their machines indeed operated properly on Nov. 3rd and that their votes were counted accurately, it is felt by most involved that this Windham audit should be done in front of its citizens, not in the distant State capital of Concord.  It makes no sense to subject sensitive electronic machinery to needless transport in winter and then leave them unattended in Concord, rather than locked in a secure vault in the town, which has ownership of the devices.  In following with this sentiment, town officials indicated they would likely refuse to unlock the vault and allow this apparent confiscation of their machines.
To those advocating for this long-delayed investigation, it is clear the AGs office has lost the trust of the people to whom it is accountable, the citizens of not just Windham, but New Hampshire.  They have clearly demonstrated their office to be an unwilling participant in this audit process and disrespectful to the rights of the citizens.  SB43 is currently scheduled to be heard in the House Election Law Committee on March 5 at 10:30 am.  Concerned citizens of the State should contact Committee members to urge support for this bill.”
Read more:

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

 

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

New Hampshire Constitution

[Art.] 67. [Election of Secretary and Treasurer.] The Secretary and Treasurer shall be chosen by joint ballot of the Senators and Representatives assembled in one room.
June 2, 1784

https://www.nh.gov/glance/secretary.htm

From New Hampshire NPR December 2, 2020.

“Gardner Holds Onto Role As Nation’s Longest Serving Secretary of State

Wednesday marked another career milestone for New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who sailed without opposition into a 23rd term, upholding his position as the longest-serving Secretary of State in the nation.

The moment stood in sharp contrast to the start of Gardner’s most recent term, when he just barely fended off a challenge from former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Colin Van Ostern.”

Read more:

https://www.nhpr.org/post/gardner-holds-role-nations-longest-serving-secretary-state#stream/0

The New Hampshire legislature elects the Secretary of State.

And now the Attorney General and Secretary of State’s office want the Dominion Voting machines that are the subject of controversy in the “Windham Incident.”

From Granite Grok February 24, 2021

“BREAKING! NH AG & SOS to “Take Possession” of the “Windham Incident” VOTING MACHINES!”

“Windham’s high level of mistrust and consternation is warranted.  The AG’s office and SOS have been performing a Jedi Mind Trick for months. Now they are being FORCED to perform an audit – and they want control of the ballots and machines ahead of time.  The optics of that is horrible.  I’ve been told several Windham town officials are against relinquishing control as well – and I hope they stand strong.

The audit should be performed in Windham – and under Windham’s control – as suggested here.  According to multiple attorney’s opinions… NH laws already allow a town’s Selectmen to perform the test – WITHOUT APPROVAL of the AG or SOS:

RSA 33-A Defines the ballots as municipal documents that are owned by the town, and;

RSA 656:40 Authorizes towns to purchase and own voting machines and;

RSA 656:42 VIII. (c) (11) Authorizes the moderator to perform pre-election certification testing of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (a) The city or town clerk is the custodian of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (c) Authorizes the selectmen to designate and define the duties of election officials to prepare and test the machines prior to an election…

So what’s the problem.  Why is Windham being prevented by the AG and SOS from running their own test, on their own equipment, with their own ballots?  What am I missing?”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/breaking-nh-ag-sos-to-take-possession-of-the-windham-incident-voting-machines

So, what is this “Windham Incident” the “Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”?

“From the ever-vigilant folk at the Live Free or Die Report (on Facebook). They have a photo of a recount sheet for the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham. The original machine counted results were wrong for all 4 Republicans by almost exactly 300 votes.

Looking at the image, we see changes of 297, 299, 303, and 298.

That is very strange. That is a large number, large enough that a Republican who lost by 100 to 300 votes would not ask for a recount. Of course, no Republican asked for a recount. It was a Democrat looking for lost votes (24 of them) to perhaps flip one seat in that local election.

And look at what they found. Something, unexpected. Something we were not supposed to see?

St Laurent (d) lost 100 votes, and their Republican opponents all gained 300, plus or minus three votes.

It could be a machine error and unique to this town, but this is a troublesome event given speculation about fraud and Dominion machine counting hacks. And if it is an error what other errors occurred  (see, at the top of the ticket).”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/10/windham-new-hampshire-recount-finds-dominion-voting-machines-shorted-republicans-all-4-republicans-lost-approx-300-votes-town-recount-coming/

Consider this:

JOE BIDEN
52.7%

424,921

DONALD TRUMP
45.4%

365,654

Governor

CHRIS SUNUNU
65.2%

516,609

DAN FELTES
33.4%

264,639

See a problem?

New Hampshire, do not let the Democrat SOS get those machines!!!

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells