Category Archives: Attorney General

Michael Sussman indictment Part 2, John Podesta interview December 4, 2017 by House Select Committee on Intelligence, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie involvement with Fusion GPS DNC and Hillary Clinton Campaign

Michael Sussman indictment Part 2, John Podesta interview December 4, 2017 by House Select Committee on Intelligence, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie involvement with Fusion GPS DNC and Hillary Clinton Campaign

“The facts that we know of in the murder of the DNC staffer, Seth Rich, was that he was gunned down blocks from his home on July 10, 2016. Washington Metro police detectives claim that Mr. Rich was a robbery victim, which is strange since after being shot twice in the back, he was still wearing a $2,000 gold necklace and watch. He still had his wallet, key and phone. Clearly, he was not a victim of robbery.”…Retired Admiral James A. Lyons March 1, 2018

“Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray May 9, 2019

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

Michael Sussman Indictment

Part 2

GateWay Pundit stated the following today September 17, 2021 regarding the Michael Sussman indictment.

“For now, based on this indictment, I expect we will see indictments of the Tech Executive, Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson, former Perkins Coie partner Marc Elias and at least two people from the Clinton Campaign. At this point, Durham is making that case that those people were responsible for “misleading” the FBI. But it begs the question, is the FBI really so stupid and gullible that they would blindly accept bullshit without checking it out first?”

From the John Podesta testimony December 4, 2017 before the House Select Committee on Intelligence.

“MR. PODESTA: —

The Fusion principals — I assume that was Mr. Simpson and Mr. Fritsch,
although I don’t know that — approached Mr. Elias in April, I believe, of 2016 and told him that they had been working for essentially a Republican entity during the course of the Republican primaries, developing information on Mr. Trump. And they were seeking to continue that work and were seeking a contract from Perkins Coie, which had the authority to contract with outside vendors to do research on behalf of the campaign. And that relationship was entered into, I believe, in April of 2016 and extended till October 31st of 2016.”

“MR. PODESTA: — and a separate arrangement with the campaign.
But the payments to Fusion, as I understand from their statements at the
end of October, were that those payments to their vendor were paid for 50 percent from the DNC and 50 percent from the campaign.
MR. CONAWAY: Okay. Fusion GPS was a 50-50 split?
MR. PODESTA: Yes.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/525895276/John-Podesta-interview-House-Select-Committee-on-Intelligence-Perkins-Coie-involvementPodesta-Testimony

ScalesJustice

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

MI attorney DePerno press release June 24, 2021 re Michigan senate efforts to cover up evidence of election fraud, SOS Benson Attorney General Nessel involved

MI attorney DePerno press release June 24, 2021 re Michigan senate efforts to cover up evidence of election fraud, SOS Benson Attorney General Nessel involved

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.     On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020

“Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel, who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant.”…Gateway Pundit Dec 13, 2020

From Michigan Attorney DePerno June 24, 2021.

“On June 23, 2021, the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee released its Report on the November 2020
Election in Michigan. With this report, the Michigan Senate is attempting to cover up evidence of
election fraud in the November 2020 general election. They are also using the mantle of government
to proactively intimidate anyone from speaking out about election fraud. These attempts to silence
citizens are a clear attempt to criminalize political speech and a violation of the First Amendment right
to free speech, freedom to assemble, and right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Notwithstanding the unconstitutional and illegal intimidation tactics by corrupt politicians, we will
continue to expose the truth to the American people. The Michigan Senate has also called for the
Attorney General to conduct an unconstitutional and illegal criminal investigation of political speech.
We caution Dana Nessel and Senator McBroom that we will ultimately present our evidence to a jury.
No corrupt politicians will dictate how the jury interprets the evidence of overwhelming election fraud.

The Michigan Senate has refused to meet with our attorneys and team of forensic experts to review
actual evidence of election fraud. Reportedly, Senator McBroom (who has been accused in the past of
violating people’s constitutional rights) has gone so far as to instruct the Republican caucus to not
review evidence for themselves. If they don’t review the evidence, they can continue to say they have
seen no evidence. Nevertheless, we have so far released 19 reports on election fraud through multiple
legal briefs filed with the 13th Circuit Court in Antrim County. We are not done. Additional reports will
be released soon. The Michigan Senate failed to properly address any of the evidence submitted in the
19 reports available for everyone to review at http://www.depernolaw.com. You can also see a great deal of
the evidence at LetsFixStuff.org. These reports expose the inherent vulnerabilities and weak or
nonexistent security protocols of voting machines. But more importantly, these reports also expose
how the voting system and election in Antrim County was actually and definitively subverted through
fraud and intentional manipulation of the voting machines; and by extrapolation, the State of Michigan.
MCL 168.797c requires Secretary of State Benson to hold a copy of the voting machine source code in
trust. She is also required to analyze and test the software at least annually. Through discovery, Ms.
Benson acknowledged that she has violated this law; yet the Michigan Senate failed to mention this
clear violation of Michigan law which provides clear evidence of voter fraud.”

Read more:

https://www.depernolaw.com/press-june24-2021.html

The Michigan government efforts to block audits of the 2020 election have been going on for months.

From Citizen Wells December 14, 2020.

“Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘””

“Today, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel tweeted a warning shot directed specifically at “Lawyers who practice in Michigan,” letting them know that their oath prevents them from filing “unjust and/or frivolous actions” or from misleading the court.”

“The brave patriot and Constitutional Attorney told The Gateway Pundit that he’s curious about the timing of Nessel’s tweet, and he wonders why “Attorney General Nessel is bringing the power of the state in to threaten attorneys?” He also told us that if Nessel is aware of misconduct by another attorney and isn’t reporting it, she is actually violating her oath by not reporting it.” DePerno told The Gateway Pundit, “Nessel’s only goal is to intimidate.””

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Bailey v Antrim County MI update May 8, 2021 “New discoveries and filings”, 1061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim, “fraud vitiates everything”

Bailey v Antrim County MI update May 8, 2021 “New discoveries and filings”, 1061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim, “fraud vitiates everything”

“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG

“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”…Antrim County audit report

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

From Attorney Matthew DePerno in

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson) 


Matthew S. DePerno, Esq.@mdeperno

New discoveries and filings today: (1) 1,061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim

(2) nearly 100% turnout between ages 65 and 80

(3) 20.3% of all ballots sent to PO boxes

From

Plaintiff’s Response to Joint Motion for Summary Disposition

Filed May 3, 2021.

“Guy and Benson worked in unison with Election Source to rig the election
by manipulating the Dominion Voting System and altering data to transfer
votes from Donald Trump to Joseph Biden.”

“Indeed, the United States Supreme Court ruled….that “fraud vitiates everything.”

https://www.depernolaw.com/bailey-documents—may-2021.html

Citizen Wells May 5, 2021.

Antrim County Michigan audit proves Dominion Voting Machines capable of flipping votes, Attorney Matthew DePerno interview on Mike Lindell’s FrankSpeech.com, Four Shocking Discoveries

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Staci Burk v Doug Ducey AZ Governor US Supreme Court conference April 30, 2021, Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case,  “constitutional claims of vote denial”

 Staci Burk v Doug Ducey AZ Governor US Supreme Court conference April 30, 2021, Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case,  “constitutional claims of vote denial”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

Staci Burk v. Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al

Case # 20-1243

is on the docket for conference April 30, 2021.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-1243

From the petition of Staci Burk.

  1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate Petitioner’s right to Equal Protection
    when it denied remand for an evidentiary hearing of Petitioner’s
    constitutional claims of vote denial through the cancellation of her
    registration, while registrations of unqualified people remained, and those
    votes were counted?
  2. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate stare decisis because its 2021 opinion
    contradicted its 2010 opinion involving the same Petitioner regarding
    whether she met the definition of “elector” to bring an election challenge,
    even though neither her voter registration status nor the statutory definition
    of “elector” had changed?
  3. Did the court clerk’s admittedly improper rejection ofPetitioner’s verification
    filed on December 7, 2020, constitute plain error?
  4. Did the Court violate Petitioner’s First Amendment rights to petition for
    redress and Due Process by considering her illegally cancelled voter
    registration where she had not been given an opportunity for an evidentiary
    hearing to present evidence regarding her attempts to reinstate it?”

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson) Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021, Michigan forensic audits revealed “algorithm used to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections”

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson) Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021, Michigan forensic audits revealed “algorithm used to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections”

“AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.””...Summit News Nov 13, 2020

“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG

“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”…Antrim County audit report

From the Plaintiff response to Defendants motions April 9, 2021

Bailey v Antrim County MI (Jocelyn Benson)

“Plaintiff’s investigative team has uncovered the algorithm, a sixth degree polynomial, used in Michigan.

To be clear, at least four (4) of the so-called battleground states have implemented an algorithm to regulate and shift votes in the 2020 elections. These algorithms are unique to each particular state. In other words, the algorithm used in Michigan does not work across the board in Ohio.”

“But make no mistake, they are each determined at the state level to shift votes based on the particular and peculiar demographics of each state.”

Read more:

More documents from Attorney DePerno website.

https://www.depernolaw.com/bailey-documents.html

From Citizen Wells February 2, 2021.

“A Michigan 13th Circuit Court chief judge has extended a deadline for the secretary of state to turn over records in a lawsuit filed by an Antrim County voter.

Judge Kevin Elsenheimer’s written order was filed on Friday, Jan. 29, with a Feb. 2 deadline for the records to be turned over. The judge has since issued an extension allowing Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson until Feb. 8 to submit the documents.

The Antrim County lawsuit is scheduled for a settlement conference on May 11 and, if necessary, a non-jury trial two-day bench trial is scheduled to begin June 8.

The judge approved a motion for discovery, ordering the secretary of state to produce information requested from Portage-based Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno, who is representing plaintiff William Bailey in Bailey versus Antrim County.”

Anti Trumper MI Attorney General Dana Nessel

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case Staci Burk v Doug Ducey Governor petition for Writ of Certiorari, Ducy waiver filed April 8, 2021, “constitutional claims of vote denial”

Arizona 2020 election SCOTUS case Staci Burk v Doug Ducey Governor petition for Writ of Certiorari, Ducy waiver filed April 8, 2021, “constitutional claims of vote denial”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

In

Staci Burk v Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al.

Waiver of Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona

filed April, 8, 2021.

From the petition of Staci Burk.

  1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate Petitioner’s right to Equal Protection
    when it denied remand for an evidentiary hearing of Petitioner’s
    constitutional claims of vote denial through the cancellation of her
    registration, while registrations of unqualified people remained, and those
    votes were counted?
  2. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate stare decisis because its 2021 opinion
    contradicted its 2010 opinion involving the same Petitioner regarding
    whether she met the definition of “elector” to bring an election challenge,
    even though neither her voter registration status nor the statutory definition
    of “elector” had changed?
  3. Did the court clerk’s admittedly improper rejection ofPetitioner’s verification
    filed on December 7, 2020, constitute plain error?
  4. Did the Court violate Petitioner’s First Amendment rights to petition for
    redress and Due Process by considering her illegally cancelled voter
    registration where she had not been given an opportunity for an evidentiary
    hearing to present evidence regarding her attempts to reinstate it?”

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona election audit update March 8, 2021, Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse, “What about ballots that were shredded in the trash?”

Arizona election audit update March 8, 2021, Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse, “What about ballots that were shredded in the trash?”

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

Senator Townsend. tours County Recorder’s ballot storage warehouse

From the comments:

J.W.
Let’s talk about the shredded ballots in the dumpster,right outside of the bay doors.

102

Mary Schindler
What about ballots that were shredded in the trash? Your state is corrupt and arrests need to be made ASAP!

302

DaveCaresForYou
Shucks they should have looked in trash to see of ballots were out there or to see if it looked the same as photos

93

Peanut Butter
Yet y’all made no comments about the ballots found in the trash

94

VoodooCrab
Is that the guy who got yelled at during the citizen’s meeting? Yeah, I do not trust this guy! He’s too eager to please the Senate and listen to him spout off about security.

 

Patriot Attorney David Clements provides interesting insights.

AZ Audit Discussion and thoughts on Jovan Hutton Pulitzer!

Dr. Lyle Rapacki talks with Shelby B. and Steve Robinson about the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, the forensic audit, and the shredded ballots that were found in a dumpster this last weekend.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

From Attorney Lin Wood on Telegram

“As I have earlier made clear, I found the whistleblower interview regarding Chief Justice Roberts, former Vice President Pence and other high ranking officials to be credible.

Given the seriousness of his statements, I made the transcript public and also provided the thumb drive to the United States Secret Service, the State Bar of Georgia, the Lawyers Club of Atlanta President and members of its Executive Committee, Mercer Law School, Mercer Law School Dean Cathy Cox, and the District Court of Colorado Bar.

Are the allegations of the whistleblower being investigated?

With the exception of the Secret Service, all of the other recipients of the whistleblower interview have to my knowledge done nothing except to falsely smear me.

I was just the messenger. I only did what I felt was my duty as a law-abiding citizen, lawyer, and officer of the court. And for that, members of the legal profession seek to destroy me.

I think you understand exactly what is going on here. I do.”

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explains why Lin Wood’s whistleblower is absolutely credible

FROM A LIN WOOD WHISTLEBLOWER TESTIMONY TRANSCRIBED MARCH 1, 2021.

· “I started providing this in 2005, and in 2008 I
13· started working directly with Rod Rosenstein in Baltimore,
14· and because of the access with the other agencies, the FBI,
15· for instance, would come for corroboration of something they
16· were working on, or just to ask questions, if I’d seen
17· something like this, if this related to anything.· Then it
18· grew from there.
19· · · · · · Because of the undercover nature of many of the
20· investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism
21· within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and
22· access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod
23· Rosenstein.”

· “INTERVIEWEE:· · · · That group, I mean, they’re all
13· interconnected one way or another.· That particular group was
14· Rod, VP Pence, Paul Ryan.· That was the core of that group.
15· Rod was in there, but that was the core of it.· It was an
16· attempt, where Rod was the brilliant legal mind behind it, to
17· remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment.”

“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts — a lot
24· of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as
25· favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people.
·2· · · · · · We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief
·3· Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but
·4· it was also — Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type
·5· to various agencies around the world.· They used his
·6· information.· They exploited it for their own good.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/05/lin-wood-whistleblower-transcripts-transcribed-mar-1-2021-re-justice-roberts-mike-pence-rod-rosenstein-et-al-ref-in-feb-9-us-district-court-affidavit/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures. In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.  Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.”…Citizen Wells

 

Oral arguments were presented today before the US Supreme Court, March 2, 2021 in

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

Listen here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/19-1257

Read Transcript:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2020/19-1257_d1o2.pdf

More on the case here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/02/arizona-ag-brnovich-scotus-case-importance-in-oral-hearing-today-tue-march-2-2021-ga-folded-to-abrams-dnc-demands-and-az-fighting-to-maintain-election-laws/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

This should be an open and closed case.

The procedures being questioned follow those of most states.

By the Constitution, the states have control over election procedures.

High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures.

In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.

Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.

Hence today’s hearing.

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in Texas v PA GA MI WI, Dec 9, 2020.

“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in the AZ Senate Maricopa County case Dec 30, 2020.

“The Arizona Legislature has broad authority to investigate the County’s
administration of the 2020 general election to determine whether Arizona law regarding election administration should remain the same or be changed. In resolving this matter, the Court should (1) recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad authority to issue legislative subpoenas, (2) exercise deferential review of the subpoenas at issue, (3) hold that the presiding officer of either house or the chairman of any committee have the authority to issue subpoenas reviewing the County’s administration of elections, and (4) reject any effort by the County to interpose separation of powers concerns.”

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Maricopa%20County%20v%20Fann_%20AGO%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

From the Brnovich Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

Why did the Supreme Court take this case?

It goes to the core of the constitution and states rights to administer elections.

Secondly, AG Brnovich is on defense, not offense.

 

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts