Monthly Archives: September 2018

Dishonest Democrats control dishonest Fake News Media to prop up legitimize dishonest Christine Blasey Ford testimony & psycho babble, “exploited units of human capital”

Dishonest Democrats control dishonest Fake News Media to prop up legitimize dishonest Christine Blasey Ford testimony & psycho babble, “exploited units of human capital”

However, when the CHD funds Alinsky-style, church-based community organizations as in the best interest of the poor and supports organizations which advance other agendas, it divests the poor of their right to an authentic voice. This process tends to treat the poor as exploited units of human capital, rather than as human beings created in the dignity of God’s image.”…report to the Catholic Bishops 1997

“the Democratic Party overlooked the ethical red flags and made a pact with Mr. Clinton that was the equivalent of a pact with the devil. And he delivered. With Mr. Clinton at the controls, the party won the White House twice. But in the process it lost its bearings and maybe even its soul.”…Bob Herbert, NY Times February 26, 2001

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

 

“There is nothing new under the sun” and you can depend on the Democrats using people as “exploited units of human capital”.

Christine Blasey Ford has some issues that need addressing and may have had a traumatic experience when she was young. She believes that she did and has unjustly accused Brett Kavanaugh without any corroboration of her flawed memory. Her story fell apart.

Ms. Ford, despite many years of psychological education, made the following statements during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee:

DURBIN: “Dr. Ford, with what degree of certainty do you believe Brett Kavanaugh assaulted you?”

FORD: “One hundred percent.”

Ford tries to impress the audience with pseudo science:

FORD: “The same way that I’m sure that I’m talking to you right now. It’s — just basic memory functions. And also just the level of norepinephrine and epinephrine in the brain that, sort of, as you know, encodes — that neurotransmitter encodes memories into the hippocampus. And so, the trauma-related experience, then, is kind of locked there, whereas other details kind of drift.”

FEINSTEIN: “So what you are telling us is this could not be a case of mistaken identity?”

FORD: “Absolutely not.”

https://citizenwells.com/2018/09/29/christine-blasey-ford-dishonesty-zero-credibility-bombshell-not-photos-elizabeth-loftus-uc-irvine-need-independent-evidence-to-corroborate-your-memories-bigger-story-democrats/

Ford lied and tried to bullshit with psycho babble.

What the experts say:

“First up, we have Elizabeth Loftus from the University of California, Irvine, who is one of the founders of the area of false memory research, and is considered one of the most ‘eminent psychologists of the 20thcentury.

Elizabeth Loftus says you need independent evidence to corroborate your memories.

According to Loftus: “The one take home message that I have tried to convey in my writings, and classes, and in my TED talk is this: Just because someone tells you something with a lot of confidence and detail and emotion, it doesn’t mean it actually happened. You need independent corroboration to know whether you’re dealing with an authentic memory, or something that is a product of some other process.”  

 

“Chris French wants you to stop believing common memory myths.

“My top 5 take-home messages on memory:

1. Memory does not work like a video camera, accurately recording all of the details of witnessed events. Instead, memory (like perception) is a constructive process. We typically remember the gist of an event rather than the exact details.

2. When we  construct a memory, errors can occur. We will typically fill in gaps in our memories with what we think we must have experienced not necessarily what we actually did experience. We may also include misinformation we encountered after the event. We will not even be consciously aware that this has happened.

3. We not only distort memories for events that we have witnessed, we may have completely false memories for events that never occurred at all. Such false memories are particularly likely to arise in certain contexts, such as (unintentionally) through the use of certain dubious psychotherapeutic techniques or (intentionally) in psychology experiments.

4. There is no convincing evidence to support the existence of the psychoanalytic concept of repression, despite it being a widely accepted concept.

5. There is currently no way to distinguish, in the absence of independent evidence, whether a particular memory is true or false. Even memories which are detailed and vivid and held with 100 percent conviction can be completely false.””

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/what-experts-wish-you-knew-about-false-memories/

The senators are typically well educated and many have legal educations. From the hearing:

COONS: “Thank you, Chairman Grassley. I’d like to ask unanimous consent to submit for the record five articles, including one titled “Why Sexual Assault Memories Stick,””

KLOBUCHAR: OK. You know from my experience with memory, I remember distinctly things that happened to me in high school or happened to me in college.

HIRONO: “The prosecutor should know that sexual assault survivors often do not remember peripheral information such as what happened before or after the traumatic event, and yet, she will persist in asking these questions all to undermine the memory and basically, the credibility of Dr. Ford. But we all know Dr. Ford’s memory of the assault is very clear.”

An internet search today yields every possible excuse in the world for her flawed, psycho babble testimony.

Compare the fake news media explanations to the experts above.

Memory is flawed, unreliable and must have corroborating evidence to be credible!

I found an honest report at the Mlwaukee Journal Sentinel.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/investigations/daniel-bice/2018/09/29/ron-johnson-suggests-christine-blasey-ford-may-have-false-memories/1460162002/

And from Fox.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/19/17878606/fox-news-kavanaugh-ford-sexual-assault-memory

Once again, the fake news media is making Trump’s case for him.

They cannot be trusted.

They continue to lie to the American People.

And the Democrats continue to use people as “exploited units of human capital”.

They have been using people of color for well over a hundred years.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Advertisements

Christine Blasey Ford dishonesty zero credibility bombshell not photos,  Elizabeth Loftus UC Irvine: “need independent evidence to corroborate your memories”, Bigger story: Democrats & Fake news media used her

Christine Blasey Ford dishonesty zero credibility bombshell not photos,  Elizabeth Loftus UC Irvine: “need independent evidence to corroborate your memories”, Bigger story: Democrats & Fake news media used her

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper.
Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that
polluted vehicle.”…. Thomas Jefferson

 

Forget the photos of Christine Blasey Ford. We already have a revealing puzzle picture of her life beginning in high school.

She drank and partied underage and deceived her parents.

Ms. Ford needs professional help and as Mr. Kavanagh’s daughter stated “our prayers.” She is dealing with some kind(s) of emotional stress that exists in her mind.

She also must be held accountable.

If a FBI investigation could be used for example to resurrect her social media and any other scrubbed incriminating evidence to prosecute her, then do it.

When this story first was broadcast, I was hesitant to get involved.

I decided to read the Washington Post account and a series of self evident truths emerged.

From Citizen Wells September 20, 2018.

“An issue of honesty was emerging.

Christine Blasey Ford was a well educated psychological professional.

From my exposure to Psych 101 and other research I knew that human memories were extremely fallible.

Ms. Ford was educated on this matter and not being honest in her portrayal of “facts.”

From Psychology Today Mar 12, 2012.

“Unreliable Memory

“We tend to think that memories are stored in our brains just as they are in computers. Once registered, the data are put away for safe-keeping and eventual recall. The facts don’t change.

But neuroscientists have shown that each time we remember something, we are reconstructing the event, reassembling it from traces throughout the brain. Psychologists have pointed out that we also suppress memories that are painful or damaging to self-esteem. We could say that, as a result, memory is unreliable. We could also say it is adaptive, reshaping itself to accommodate the new situations we find ourselves facing. Either way, we have to face the fact that it is “flexible.”

For most of us that usually means we recall a rosier past than we actually had, though some of us are tormented by memories of a painful past we can’t shake and that seems to get worse every time we revisit them. But for all of us that means an incomplete past.

Nothing brings this home better than the memories of witnesses in trials, one of the cornerstones of our legal system. All too many people have been put behind bars on the testimony of witnesses, who when challenged by more objective data have been later proved to be misremembering.”

https://citizenwells.com/2018/09/20/christine-blasey-ford-high-school-party-girl-honesty-questions-hitched-her-wagon-to-dishonest-media-and-democrat-party-glass-houses-and-stone-throwing/

Ms. Ford kept changing her story before and during her testimony. She varied her accounts of the number and makeup of attendees at the gathering in her relating to Feinstein, the polygraph exam and during testimony.

She admits that she cannot recall many details.

No one that she claims attended the gathering, including her friend Leland Keyser, corroborates her story.

The show stopper, the response that reveals her dishonesty was from this testimony:

DURBIN: “Dr. Ford, with what degree of certainty do you believe Brett Kavanaugh assaulted you?”

FORD: “One hundred percent.”

Ford tries to impress the audience with pseudo science:

FORD: “The same way that I’m sure that I’m talking to you right now. It’s — just basic memory functions. And also just the level of norepinephrine and epinephrine in the brain that, sort of, as you know, encodes — that neurotransmitter encodes memories into the hippocampus. And so, the trauma-related experience, then, is kind of locked there, whereas other details kind of drift.”

FEINSTEIN: “So what you are telling us is this could not be a case of mistaken identity?”

FORD: “Absolutely not.”

Ford is well educated. She has no excuse.

She lied!

Even people with superior memories are not immune to errors.

From the University of California, Irvine, CA, October 22, 2013.

“The recent identification of highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM) raised the possibility that there may be individuals who are immune to memory distortions.”

“HSAM individuals possess a remarkable autobiographical memory. However, these results show that even they are not immune to episodic memory distortions. Whatever the source of their exceptional autobiographical memory ability is, this does not prevent them from having memory distortions. Although it is always possible that some group might be found to be immune to memory distortions, none has as yet been discovered.”

Read more:

http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2013/11/12/1314373110.full.pdf

From Scientific American August 8, 2016.

“What Experts Wish You Knew about False Memories

Just because you’re absolutely confident you remember something accurately doesn’t mean it’s true

Every memory you have ever had is chock-full of errors. I would even go as far as saying that memory is largely an illusion.

This is because our perception of the world is deeply imperfect, our brains only bother to remember a tiny piece of what we actually experience, and every time we remember something we have the potential to change the memory we are accessing.

I often write about the ways in which our memory leads us astray, with a particular focus on ‘false memories.’ False memories are recollections that feel real but are not based on actual experience.

For this particular article I invited a few top memory researchers to comment on what they wish everyone knew about their field.

First up, we have Elizabeth Loftus from the University of California, Irvine, who is one of the founders of the area of false memory research, and is considered one of the most ‘eminent psychologists of the 20thcentury.

Elizabeth Loftus says you need independent evidence to corroborate your memories.

According to Loftus: “The one take home message that I have tried to convey in my writings, and classes, and in my TED talk is this: Just because someone tells you something with a lot of confidence and detail and emotion, it doesn’t mean it actually happened. You need independent corroboration to know whether you’re dealing with an authentic memory, or something that is a product of some other process.””

Read more:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/what-experts-wish-you-knew-about-false-memories/

I believe that Senator Flake could use some professional help as well.

However, if the FBI must be used, use them in the prosecution of Christine Blasey Ford to make an example.

The much bigger story is the Democrat Party and fake news media lying to the American people and using people for their twisted agenda.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brett Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary “hearing” silver lining, Democrats left exposed as scumbags, End justifies means agenda damages many lives, Ford needs professional help but must be held accountable

Brett Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary “hearing” silver lining, Democrats left exposed as scumbags, End justifies means agenda damages many lives, Ford needs professional help but must be held accountable

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

There is a silver lining from yesterday’s Senate Judiciary “hearing” on the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh.

I listened live to as much as I could.

I caught several lies from Christine Blasey Ford in her written testimony as well as her oral answers.

I have a copy of the transcript and will further address Ms. Fords answers as well as the behavior of the Democrats/Left.

I do have an immediate question: How did so many nut jobs get into that small room and subsequently be allowed to disrupt the proceedings?

First guess is Ms. Feinstein had a hand in that. She has gotta go.

I believe that many Americans, such as myself, are so outraged by what took place that the Dems will end up getting bitten on the ass by the fallout.

And certainly Mr. Kavanaugh will never forget this chicanery!

I have a lot on my plate but they just gave me more energy.

I hope that you feel the same way.

Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes!

WElls.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Witching hour over, Kavanaugh accusers conjured up tales disintegrate further under scrutiny, Julie Swetnick restraining order, Ford male witnesses

Witching hour over, Kavanaugh accusers conjured up tales disintegrate further under scrutiny, Julie Swetnick restraining order, Ford male witnesses

“Receptionist: How do you write women so well?
Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.”…From the movie “As good as it gets”

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

From Zero Hedge.

“Kavanaugh Mayhem: Two Men Cop To Feeling Christine Ford’s Breasts, Contradicting Her Accusation

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday night released a time of their efforts to responded to various accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh – including two men who say they they were the basis for the “groping” allegation. “

“Whoa. Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans say they have spoken to two men who think they, not Kavanaugh, had the 1982 encounter that formed the basis for her sexual abuse claim. (These tables are from a timeline the committee majority published 15 minutes ago.)”

“And earlier Wednesday, another Kavanaugh accuser – Julie Swetnick, had an ominous cloud of doubt cast over her allegation that the Supreme Court nominee and a friend were operating a date-rape “gang bang” operation at 10 high school parties she attended as a legal adult three years older than Kavanaugh (yet didn’t report once).

Politico reports that Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy – a registered Democrat, took out a restraining order against her, and says he has evidence that she’s lying. ”

Read more:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-27/kavanaugh-mayhem-two-men-cop-feeling-christine-fords-breasts-contradicting-her

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Julie Swetnick affidavit appears to be more party girl horse crap, Citizen Wells analysis, Witness to rapes and not call police makes her accessory

Julie Swetnick affidavit appears to be more party girl horse crap, Citizen Wells analysis, Witness to rapes and not call police makes her accessory

“Receptionist: How do you write women so well?
Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.”…From the movie “As good as it gets”

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

Julie Swetnick is another party girl with zero credibility.

She claims in her affidavit to have witnessed the rapes of other women.

That makes her a criminal, an accessory to crimes.

Did she mention that when applying for security clearances?

She attended over 10 of these house parties from 1981-83.

If girls were getting raped, why did she keep attending?

She states that she was raped: “I believe I was drugged using Quaaludes or something similar placed in what I was drinking,” so drugged that she could not resist the rape,  yet she remembers Brett Kavanaugh being present and after over 35 years.

She makes value judgements that she would not be qualified to make even if she were sober.

If you can’t see through this charade you are biased or dumber than dirt (or both).

She also states:

“Mark Judge has significant information concerning the conduct of Brett Kavanaugh”

That is correct.

Mark Judge stated: “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,”

https://www.scribd.com/document/389518475/s-Wet-Nick-Statement#download&from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

We Are Living Nineteen Eighty-Four 1984 (Citizen Wells position since 2008), History scrubbed (rectified), Truth due process evidence rights swept aside

We Are Living Nineteen Eighty-Four 1984 (Citizen Wells position since 2008), History scrubbed (rectified), Truth due process evidence rights swept aside

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
your own memory?”…George Orwell, “1984″

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

From National Review.

“We Are Living Nineteen Eighty-Four

Truth, due process, evidence, rights of the accused: All are swept aside in pursuit of the progressive agenda.
George Orwell’s 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four is no longer fiction. We are living it right now.

Google techies planned to massage Internet searches to emphasize correct thinking. A member of the so-called deep state, in an anonymous op-ed, brags that its “resistance” is undermining an elected president. The FBI, CIA, DOJ, and NSC were all weaponized in 2016 to ensure that the proper president would be elected — the choice adjudicated by properly progressive ideology. Wearing a wire is now redefined as simply flipping on an iPhone and recording your boss, boy- or girlfriend, or co-workers.

But never has the reality that we are living in a surreal age been clearer than during the strange cycles of Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

In Orwell’s world of 1984 Oceania, there is no longer a sense of due process, free inquiry, rules of evidence and cross examination, much less a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Instead, regimented ideology — the supremacy of state power to control all aspects of one’s life to enforce a fossilized idea of mandated quality — warps everything from the use of language to private life.”

“Feinstein’s anonymous trick did not work. So pressure mounted to reveal or leak Ford’s identity and thereby force an Anita-Hill–like inquest that might at least show old white men Republican senators as insensitive to a vulnerable and victimized woman.

The problem, of course, was that, under traditional notions of jurisprudence, Ford’s allegations simply were not provable. But America soon discovered that civic and government norms no longer follow the Western legal tradition. In Orwellian terms, Kavanaugh was now at the mercy of the state. He was tagged with sexual battery at first by an anonymous accuser, and then upon revelation of her identity, by a left-wing, political activist psychology professor and her more left-wing, more politically active lawyer.”

“Rights of the accused? They too do not exist. In the American version of 1984, the accuser, a.k.a. the more ideologically correct party, dictates to authorities the circumstances under which she will be investigated and cross-examined: She will demand all sorts of special considerations of privacy and exemptions; Kavanaugh will be forced to return and face cameras and the public to prove that he was not then, and has never been since, a sexual assaulter.

In our 1984 world, the accused is considered guilty if merely charged, and the accuser is a victim who can ruin a life but must not under any circumstance be made uncomfortable in proving her charges.

Doublespeak abounds. “Victim” solely refers to the accuser, not the accused, who one day was Brett Kavanaugh, a brilliant jurist and model citizen, and the next morning woke up transformed into some sort of Kafkaesque cockroach. The media and political operatives went in a nanosecond from charging that she was groped and “assaulted” to the claim that she was “raped.”

In our 1984, the phrase “must be believed” is doublespeak for “must never face cross-examination.””

“Memory Holes

Then we come to Orwell’s idea of “memory holes,” or mechanisms to wipe clean inconvenient facts that disrupt official ideological narratives. Shortly after Ford was named, suddenly her prior well-publicized and self-referential social-media revelations vanished, as if she’d never held her minor-league but confident pro-Sanders, anti-Trump opinions. And much of her media and social-media accounts were erased as well.

Similarly, one moment the New York Times — just coming off an embarrassing lie in reporting that U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley had ordered new $50,000 office drapes on the government dime — reported that Kavanaugh’s alleged accomplice, Mark Judge, had confirmed Ford’s allegation. Indeed, in a sensational scoop, according to the Times, Judge told the Judiciary Committee that he does remember the episode and has nothing more to say. In fact, Judge told the committee the very opposite: that he does not remember the episode. Forty minutes later, the Times embarrassing narrative vanished down the memory hole.

The online versions of some of the yearbooks of Ford’s high school from the early 1980s vanished as well. At times, they had seemed to take a perverse pride in the reputation of the all-girls school for underage drinking, carousing, and, on rarer occasions, “passing out” at parties. Such activities were supposed to be the monopoly and condemnatory landscape of the “frat boy” and spoiled-white-kid Kavanaugh — and certainly not the environment in which the noble Ford navigated. Seventeen-year-old Kavanaugh was to play the role of a falling-down drunk; Ford, with impressive powers of memory of an event 36 years past, assures us that as a circumspect 15-year-old, she had only “one beer.”

A former teenage friend of Ford’s sent out a flurry of social-media postings, allegedly confirming that Ford’s ordeal was well known to her friends in 1982 and so her assault narrative must therefore be confirmed. Then, when challenged on some of her incoherent details (schools are not in session during summertime, and Ford is on record as not telling anyone of the incident for 30 years), she mysteriously claimed that she no longer could stand by her earlier assertions, which likewise soon vanished from her social-media account. Apparently, she had assumed that in 2018 Oceania ideologically correct citizens merely needed to lodge an accusation and it would be believed, without any obligation on her part to substantiate her charges.

When a second accuser, Deborah Ramirez, followed Ford seven days later to allege another sexual incident with the teenage Kavanaugh, at Yale 35 years ago, it was no surprise that she followed the now normal Orwellian boilerplate: None of those whom she named as witnesses could either confirm her charges or even remember the alleged event. She had altered her narrative after consultations with lawyers and handlers. She too confesses to underage drinking during the alleged event. She too is currently a social and progressive political activist. The only difference from Ford’s narrative is that Ramirez’s accusation was deemed not credible enough to be reported even by the New York Times, which recently retracted false stories about witness Mark Judge in the Ford case, and which falsely reported that U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley had charged the government for $50,000 office drapes.

As in 1984, “truths” in these sorts of allegations do not exist unless they align with the larger “Truth” of the progressive project. In our case, the overarching Truth mandates that, in a supposedly misogynist society, women must always be believed in all their accusations and should be exempt from all counter-examinations.”

“According to some polls, about half the country believes that Brett Kavanaugh is now guilty of a crime committed 36 years ago at the age of 17. And that reality reminds us that we are no longer in America. We are already living well into the socialist totalitarian Hell that Orwell warned us about long ago.”

Read more:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-nomination-battle-like-orwells-1984/

Citizen Wells has warned you continuously about this since 2008.

1984

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Christine Blasey Ford bombshell photo?, Panties topless surrounded by booze, Told best friend she had 64 sexual partners between 11th grade & college?

Christine Blasey Ford bombshell photo?, Panties topless surrounded by booze, Told best friend she had 64 sexual partners between 11th grade & college?

“Receptionist: How do you write women so well?
Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.”…From the movie “As good as it gets”

“Democrat mantra: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

***  Update 9/29/2018 4:15 PM ***

This was posted with a question mark with the hope that someone could verify or dismiss the photo as real. One commenter stated that thongs were not used then. That is incorrect.

Snopes responded (In what appears to be a lame response):

” it’s much too modern in appearance and detail to be a snapshot from the late 1980s (when Christine Blasey was a young woman). Moreover, rather than “being supplied by a female classmate,” this photograph was also already online with a caption identifying it as something found on a Spanish-language humor and entertainment website, until someone plucked it and recaptioned it with Christine Blasey’s name”

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blasey-online-photos/

Based on the lack of corroboration, I am dismissing the photo as real. Wells

For the real bombshell news on Ms. Ford:

https://citizenwells.com/2018/09/29/christine-blasey-ford-dishonesty-zero-credibility-bombshell-not-photos-elizabeth-loftus-uc-irvine-need-independent-evidence-to-corroborate-your-memories-bigger-story-democrats/

*********************************

Ms. Ford, if any of the following is incorrect please respond and your response will be posted prominently.

 

From State of the Nation.

“KEY POINT: Christine Blasey Ford and her feminazi lawyers who have carried out this charade have profoundly disrespected the Senate and the SCOTUS justice confirmation process.  They have made frivolous demands and requested relentless accommodation by the Judiciary Committee regarding her promised testimony that everyone knows are nothing but stalling tactics.  Would the Republican majority still cut her so much slack after seeing this photo of Ford at a pool party?”

“There really is something very wrong with these people!

A quick scan of today’s headlines clearly shows that the Democratic Party is so out of control it’s scary.  Their sheer desperation to thwart the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh is unlike anything the country has witnessed before.

The only conclusion that one can come to is that they have lost their God-given capacity to apply human reason or to utilize common sense.  Hence, this obstreperous tribe of political bolsheviks can no longer be allowed to exercise political power in these United States of America.  The most corrupt and criminal need to be removed from their key posts within the U.S. Federal Government before they do something really stupid.


KEY POINT: These agents of Deep State have already launched a full-blown soft coup against President Trump with daily black ops and psyops.  They have been unrelenting in their brazen attempts to delegitmize the POTUS with every news cycle.  The real concern now is that the bolsheviks will conduct a violent coup d’état as a result of so many failed initiative to topple Trump.


The entire Democratic Party has been taken over by extreme left-wing radicals, ultra-liberals, hyper-progressives, socialist demagogues, communist provocateurs and balaclava-covered bolsheviks who bear no resemblance to the party of John F. Kennedy.

Christine Blasey Ford

If there is one ultra-liberal persona who has come to represent everything that is wrong with the Democratic party it is Christine Blasey Ford.  Her fastidiously planned charade was carried out as a psyop to disrupt and alter the outcome of what was shaping up to be a slam dunk confirm for Brett Kavanaugh.  Ford’s every move has exposed her as either a complete fool and/or an unwitting dupe who tried to fool the American people, as well as a tool of Deep State who has ruined her reputation forever.”

Read more:

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=104239

From the Tweet above:

“She told her best friend she had 64 sexual partners between 11th grade thru college.”

Is this true?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/