Monthly Archives: December 2020

Pennsylvania members of US House of Representatives Dan Meuser et al statement regarding certification of electors December 31, 2020, PA unlawful actions

Pennsylvania members of US House of Representatives Dan Meuser et al statement regarding certification of electors December 31, 2020, PA unlawful actions

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.”…Peter Navarro report

“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

 

From US Representative Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania December 31, 2020.

“PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS OF CONGRESS RELEASE STATEMENT REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTORS

December 31, 2020
Press Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Pennsylvania members of the U.S. House of Representatives including Congressman Dan Meuser (PA-9), Congressman Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson (PA-15), Congressman Mike Kelly (PA-16), Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10), Congressman Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Congressman Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14), Congressman John Joyce (PA-13), and Congressman Fred Keller (PA-12) released the following joint statement:

“The United States Constitution is unambiguous in declaring that state legislatures are the entity with authority to set election procedure – 

“Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…

“Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2: Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…

“Unfortunately, the many unlawful actions undertaken by the Pennsylvania Governor’s office, the Secretary of State, and what has been described as a rogue Pennsylvania Supreme Court exceeded and circumvented the state legislature’s clear constitutional authority.

“The unlawful actions include, but are not limited to:

  • Accepting ballots past 8:00 pm on Election Day
  • Not properly requiring signatures to match those on mail-in ballots or requiring dates
    • Meanwhile, the matching of signatures was required at a polling site
  • Authorizing the curing of mail-in ballots with less than a 24-hour’s notice
    • Only some counties were informed and adhered to this order leaving voters treated unequally from county to county
  • Authorizing the use of unsecure drop boxes, which is not permitted in statute
  • Prohibiting certified poll watchers overseeing the canvassing of ballots in Philadelphia

“These unlawful actions were taken without the authority or consent of the Pennsylvania state legislature. These are facts, and they are indisputable.

“Additionally, the Pennsylvania Attorney General did nothing with regard to these unlawful activities. Not one inquiry, no questioning, and certainly no investigations. Not to mention that hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits outlining election complaints and potential fraud were documented, submitted, and ignored. The Pennsylvania election could be summed up as a free-for-all with no oversight and different standards applied throughout the Commonwealth. It is also very apparent that the unlawful actions described were concentrated in heavily populated, Democrat-led counties.

“By definition, such unlawful, unregulated, and inconsistent activities resulted in a highly questionable and inaccurate vote total. The scope of these inaccuracies cannot be known until the legal ballots are identified and counted, and the illegal ballots are disqualified. This has not been done.

“Therefore, the state’s official certification of electors was based upon a flawed system and an inaccurate vote count. Thus, very possibly resulting in an erroneous certification.

“Until these unlawful practices are acknowledged and corrected, we cannot agree to support electors chosen based upon an inaccurate total vote count. The voters of Pennsylvania deserve integrity in the election process and equal protection under the law.

“This very unfortunate, volatile, and distressing situation is due to the lack of respect and regard for the law and the U.S. Constitution as well as the Pennsylvania State Constitution. Additionally, the failure of Pennsylvania’s justice system to seek the truth, rather than stay silent, allowed these irregular, unlawful actions to create a high level of mistrust in the process as well as a potentially flawed outcome.

“If there is an American ideal that all citizens, regardless of party affiliation, can agree upon is that we must have election integrity. Election integrity is the only way to ensure trust in our elections and it is accomplished by adhering to our Constitution and the law.””

https://meuser.house.gov/media/press-releases/pennsylvania-members-congress-release-statement-regarding-certification

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Seth Rich update part 2, Huddleston v FBI filed Dec 30, 2020 by Attorney Ty Clevenger, “acted in the utmost bad faith” 3 years, Who or what is FBI protecting?

Seth Rich update part 2, Huddleston v FBI filed Dec 30, 2020 by Attorney Ty Clevenger, “acted in the utmost bad faith” 3 years, Who or what is FBI protecting?

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

Yesterday we presented “show stopper” evidence from Attorney Ty Clevenger.

“The National Security Agency is hiding records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to one of my sources, who informed me yesterday that the records are classified as a special access program (the highest level of classification) because they include intercepted communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/30/seth-rich-update-dec-30-2020-nsa-hiding-records-between-seth-rich-and-julian-assange-intercepted-communications-between-rich-and-assange/

Something else very important happened yesterday.

Filed by Attorney Ty Clevenger December 30, 2020.

Brian Huddleston v FBI

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY

“Under normal circumstances, the Plaintiff would not oppose an extension of time to respond to document requests. These are not, however, normal circumstances. As set forth below, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) has acted in the utmost bad faith over a period of three years, going so far as perpetrate frauds on two federal courts. The Plaintiff therefore urges the Court to grant the Defendants significantly less time than they requested, and he further moves the Court to order the Defendants to explain the reasons for their delay.”

“The timing of Mr. Rich’s murder, and the fact that he worked for the DNC,
quickly led to suspicions that his murder might be connected to the transfer of thousands of DNC emails to Wikileaks. Id. The publication of those emails upended the Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, id., and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange strongly inferred that the emails were obtained from Mr. Rich. See “Julian Assange on Seth Rich,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg. Mr. Assange’s claim contradicted the narrative promoted by the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, i.e., that “Russian hackers” were responsible for obtaining and transferring the DNC emails to Wikileaks, and Mr. Assange’s claim is controversial even now.”

“Argument
When Mr. Huddleston submitted his FOIA request on April 9, 2020, he did not
give the FBI the option of playing dumb. As the Court can see from Mr. Huddleston’s letter (Doc. No. 3, internal exhibit 1), he expressly referenced the laptop as well as the correspondence about Mr. Rich that the FBI had accidentally released from the Washington Field Office. Now, after more than three years of delay and deception, the FBI has finally admitted that it has thousands of records pertaining to Mr. Rich, not to mention his laptop, yet it asks this Court to delay matters even further. The Defendants
purport to ask this Court for a three-month stay, but in reality they are asking this court for an indefinite delay. According to the Court’s October 23, 2010 Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 9), the Defendants’ production was due two days ago, yet the Defendants ask the Court to wait three months before even deciding when document production should begin.

Given the FBI’s long history of deception and bad faith, the Court should not
countenance vague and open-ended requests for additional time. If there is an FBI report about communications between Seth Rich and Wikileaks, then the FBI should be able to locate that report immediately. The FBI should be ordered to produce any such report within seven days of the Court’s order, which should give the agency enough time to make redactions (the parties can fight over the redactions later). Furthermore, the FBI should begin a rolling production of responsive materials not later than January 29, 2021, to be completed not later than March 31, 2021. The Plaintiff primarily is interested in records indicating whether Seth Rich played a role in leaking DNC emails to Wikileaks.
Accordingly, the FBI should be directed to focus its initial efforts on such records. Finally, the FBI official responsible for this matter should be directed to explain under oath why the search has taken so long and why the agency needs additional time. ”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.197917/gov.uscourts.txed.197917.11.0.pdf

Who or what is the FBI protecting?

Hillary Clinton?

And where was Attorney General Barr?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

Arizona AG Brnovich Amicus Brief filed Dec 30, 2020, “Legislature has broad constitutional and statutory authority to issue legislative subpoenas”

Arizona AG Brnovich Amicus Brief filed Dec 30, 2020, “Legislature has broad constitutional and statutory authority to issue legislative subpoenas”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

 

From the

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF
ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
MARK BRNOVICH

Filed December 30, 2020.

“The Arizona Legislature Has Broad Constitutional and Statutory Authority
To Issue Legislative Subpoenas.
Any decision the Court issues should recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad
authority to issue and enforce legislative subpoenas. The County incorrectly takes a narrow view of the legislative subpoena power.”

CONCLUSION
In 1885, before becoming president, Woodrow Wilson commended the power of
Congress to investigate as follows:
“It is the proper duty of a representative body to look diligently into every
affair of government and to talk much about what it sees. It is meant to be
the eyes and the voice, and to embody the wisdom and will of its
constituents. Unless Congress have and use every means of acquainting
itself with the acts and the disposition of the administrative agents of the
government, the country must be helpless to learn how it is being served;
and unless Congress both scrutinize these things and sift them by every
form of discussion, the country must remain in embarrassing, crippling
ignorance of the very affairs which it is most important that it should
understand and direct.”

Wilson, CONGRESSIONAL GOVERNMENT, 303 (1885). One hundred and thirty-five years later, President Wilson’s words still ring true.

The Arizona Legislature has broad authority to investigate the County’s
administration of the 2020 general election to determine whether Arizona law regarding election administration should remain the same or be changed. In resolving this matter, the Court should (1) recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad authority to issue legislative subpoenas, (2) exercise deferential review of the subpoenas at issue, (3) hold that the presiding officer of either house or the chairman of any committee have the authority to issue subpoenas reviewing the County’s administration of elections, and (4) reject any effort by the County to interpose separation of powers concerns.”

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Maricopa%20County%20v%20Fann_%20AGO%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

Photo below:

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Seth Rich update Dec 30, 2020, NSA hiding records between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, Intercepted communications between Rich and Assange

Seth Rich update Dec 30, 2020, NSA hiding records between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, Intercepted communications between Rich and Assange

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

From Attorney Ty Clevenger December 30, 2020.

“National Security Agency hiding communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange

The National Security Agency is hiding records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to one of my sources, who informed me yesterday that the records are classified as a special access program (the highest level of classification) because they include intercepted communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

Meanwhile, I’ve been authorized to release the transcript of a July 15, 2020 deposition of Pulitzer-Prize-winning journalist Sy Hersh, wherein Mr. Hersh is forced to admit that he did speak with a senior intelligence official about an FBI report about Mr. Rich and Wikileaks. That contradicts much of what Mr. Hersh has said publicly since early 2017 (more on that below).

As my regular readers know, Mr. Rich was murdered in Washington, D.C. on July 10, 2016, and shortly thereafter Wikileaks published thousands of DNC emails that were very embarrassing to then-Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. On August 9, 2016, Mr. Assange intimated that the DNC emails were obtained from Mr. Rich, not Russian hackers.

If you doubt my source, recall that three weeks ago — after three years of denials — the FBI was finally forced to admit that it had thousands of records about Mr. Rich, as well as his laptop. Meanwhile, virtually no one in official Washington has lifted a finger to help.

On May 7, 2020, for example, I sent a letter to Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell asking him to de-classify the NSA’s records about Mr. Rich, and I copied the letter to Republican Senators Chuck Grassley, Lindsey Graham, and Ron Johnson, as well as Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. Mr. Grenell left office shortly thereafter, so I sent it with a cover letter to current Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on June 2, 2020.

To date, no one has responded to the letter. Absolutely no one. And for reasons that I do not yet fully understand, none of the Republicans in Congress (or even in the Trump Administration) are willing to go anywhere near the subject of Seth Rich. It’s like the last bus stop before Pizzagate (maybe I need to start looking into that, too).”

Read more:

https://lawflog.com/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Georgia Senate subcommittee election hearing Dec 30, Amazing testimony & evidence, Motion to request mail in ballots for Cheeley Law & Pulitzer review

Georgia Senate subcommittee election hearing Dec 30, Amazing testimony & evidence, Motion to request mail in ballots for Cheeley Law & Pulitzer review

“Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., a cybersecurity expert from Texas, testified that his team had compared data from Dominion voting machines in those places where they were used around the nation…..Ramsland estimated that these anomalies translated to between 123,000 and 136,000 extra votes for Vice President Biden in Georgia.”…GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

Anyone who witnessed the Georgia Senate subcommittee election hearing today December 30, 2020 who doesn’t now believe there was widespread flagrant election fraud and irregularities is crazy and/or corrupt.

The testimony and evidence provided was amazing and compelling.

Possibly the most forceful and compelling testimony came from expert witness  Jovan Pulitzer.

He explained the discrepancies in some of the ballots.

His presentation began around 1:18:50.

 

Among those testifying in the latter part of the hearing were Rudy Giuliani and Bob Cheeley of the Cheeley Law Group.

At the end a motion was voted on to request mail in ballots from Fulton County for review by the Cheeley Law Group and Jovan Pulitzer.

This is some of the most compelling and relevant testimony you will ever hear and you are urged to watch it.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

NTD live expert analysis of paper ballots watch live December 30, 2020

NTD live expert analysis of paper ballots watch live December 30, 2020

“Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., a cybersecurity expert from Texas, testified that his team had compared data from Dominion voting machines in those places where they were used around the nation…..Ramsland estimated that these anomalies translated to between 123,000 and 136,000 extra votes for Vice President Biden in Georgia.”…GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Arizona election rally Wed Dec 30 6:00 PM Liz Harris & 800 volunteers audit results, Bobby Piton data analysis sample, Matt Braynard AZ hearing testimony 

Arizona election rally Wed Dec 30 6:00 PM Liz Harris & 800 volunteers audit results, Bobby Piton data analysis sample, Matt Braynard AZ hearing testimony

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

 

***  Update 7:20 AM  December 31  ***

If you missed the rally you can watch it below

*************************************

Hopefully you have been paying attention and were already aware of Matt Braynard’s testimony at the Arizona election hearing.

From We the People Daily.

“I have a high degree of confidence that the number of ballots that were cast that should not have been cast, illegal ballots, surpasses the margin of victory as it stands right now,” said Braynard said at a public hearing on election issues in Arizona.

Braynard, a former Trump data strategist who runs the Voter Integrity Project, made headlines after raising money to purchase voting information for a ‘deep-dive’ analysis looking for fraudulent activity. Earlier in the hearing, he said that he and his team called Arizona residents who had never voted before, yet voted in this election. One of them is a felon who can’t legally vote.”

“Following Braynard’s comments, data expert Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai said that the only way for Biden to have caught up with Trump’s lead in Arizona following election day is if votes came in a 130% Biden and -30% for Trump.”

“Switching gears to voting machines – Col. Phil Waldron (Ret.), a cybersecurity expert, testified that his team warned the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that voting machines are vulnerable to hackers and manipulation.

“When I started working on this project in August, I called them up and said, you guys have got to come out and look at it. They did. They spent an initial three hours going through this data. At the end of that, one of them said, ‘I think I need to go outside and throw up,” said Waldron, speaking of Dominion Votings Systems machines.”

Read more:

https://wethepeopledaily.com/2020/12/01/democrats-panic-over-analysts-deep-dive-testimony/

You may not be aware of this:

Liz Harris, a Arizona State Rep, with some of her volunteers and other concerned citizens, are holding a rally in front of the AZ Statehouse today, Wednesday December 30, 2020 at 6:00 PM.

They will be revealing the results of their audit using 800 volunteers and the results of an analysis by mathematician Bobby Piton.

From the Geller Report.

“Enthusiasm is contagious and Bobby Piton has no shortage of it. Piton became an instant success after his appearance at the first round of hearings on election integrity in Arizona. Piton, an investment advisor and managing partner of Pre-Active Investments, is also a self-proclaimed math enthusiast, who was called in to assist a colleague to decipher election data from Arizona, just days before the hearing.

Piton analyzed the data from Arizona’s own government databases and discovered a unique subset of voters who could not be identified by their binary sex (male or female), which he termed ‘U’ voters. In Arizona alone, he identified as many as 300,000 of these U voters. He believes the voters comprising the U group are “phantoms”, or fake people who cast votes.

To prove his theory, Piton identified a subset of about 95,000 of these “phantom sleeper voters” in Arizona. A group of volunteers led by Liz Harris, candidate for AZ state representative in the 17th district, set out to determine whether these voters existed or whether they were truly phantoms. Of the 95,000 names identified, Piton narrowed down the potentially fake voters to a subset of 3899 potential phantoms on which to focus their efforts. He estimated 20 to 30% would be non-existent phantoms.

Harris and her team set out to find these voters and began a door-knocking campaign. The volunteers were able to knock on 2000 doors in an attempt to find the individual voters on the phantom list. They were successful in finding 1000 people willing to talk to them and of those, 539 voters who should have resided at the residence were non-existent. That is an incredible 53.9% of the registered voters who were “phantom sleeper voters”.”

Read more:

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/analysist-identifies-phantom-voters-used-to-dilute-legal-votes-in-several-states.html/

Photo below:

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Pennsylvania election vote totals don’t add up, State rep Russ Diamond report Dec 29, 2020, “202,377 more votes cast than voters voting”, Certification error

Pennsylvania election vote totals don’t add up, State rep Russ Diamond report Dec 29, 2020, “202,377 more votes cast than voters voting”, Certification error

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.”…Peter Navarro report

“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

 

From Pennsylvania State Rep Russ Diamond December 28, 2020.

“PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

HARRISBURG – A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf. These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election.

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.

The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States. On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.

The lawmakers issued the following statement in response to their findings:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in this analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).

Rep. Frank Ryan
101st Legislative District
Pennsylvania House of Representatives”

http://www.repdiamond.com/News/18754/Latest-News/PA-Lawmakers-Numbers-Don%E2%80%99t-Add-Up,-Certification-of-Presidential-Results-Premature-and-In-Error

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al US District Court Eastern Texas filed December 27, 2020, VP Pence as President of Senate is subject solely to 12th Amendment

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al US District Court Eastern Texas filed December 27, 2020, VP Pence as President of Senate is subject solely to 12th Amendment

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

“And if I were a Democrat primary voter, I’d want these questions satisfactorily answered before I cast my final vote.”…Senator Johnson Mar 4, 2020 on Hunter Biden investigation

 

From

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al

Filed December 27, 2020 in 

US District Court Eastern Texas

COMPLAINT FOR EXPEDITED
DECLARATORY AND
EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
73. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court issue a judgment that:
A. Declares that Section 15 of the Electoral Count Act, 3 U.S.C. §§5 and 15, is
unconstitutional because it violates the Twelfth Amendment on its face, Amend.
XII, Constitution;
B. Declares that Section 15 of the Electoral Count Act, 3 U.S.C. §§5 and 15, is
unconstitutional because it violates the Electors Clause. U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1,
cl. 1;
C. Declares that Vice-President Pence, in his capacity as President of Senate and
Presiding Officer of the January 6, 2021 Joint Session of Congress, is subject
solely to the requirements of the Twelfth Amendment and may exercise the exclusive authority and sole discretion in determining which electoral votes to
count for a given State;

D. Enjoins reliance on any provisions of the Electoral Count Act that would limit
Defendant’s exclusive authority and his sole discretion to determine which of two
or more competing slates of electors’ votes are to be counted for President;
E. Declares that, with respect to competing slates of electors from the State of
Arizona or other Contested States, or with respect to objection to any single slate
of electors, the Twelfth Amendment contains the exclusive dispute resolution
mechanisms, namely, that (i) Vice-President Pence determines which slate of
electors’ votes shall be counted, or if none be counted, for that State and (ii) if no
person has a majority, then the House of Representatives (and only the House of
Representatives) shall choose the President where “the votes [in the House of
Representatives] shall be taken by states, the representation from each state
having one vote,” U.S. CONST. amend. XII;
F. Declares that, also with respect to competing slates of electors, the alternative
dispute resolution procedure or priority rule in 3 U.S.C. § 15, is null and void
insofar as it contradicts and replaces the Twelfth Amendment rules above by with
an entirely different procedure in which the House and Senate each separately
“decide” which slate is to be counted, and in the event of a disagreement, then
only “the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by
the executive of the State … shall be counted,” 3 U.S.C. § 15;

G. Enjoins the Defendant from executing his duties on January 6th during the Joint
Session of Congress in any manner that is insistent with the declaratory relief set
forth herein, and
H. Issue any other declaratory judgments or findings or injunctions necessary to
support or effectuate the foregoing declaratory judgment.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Gohmert-v-Pence.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/