Tag Archives: drugs

Rapegate about Bill Clinton serial rapes and coverup with Hillary’s assistance, Clintons war on women, rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed, power

Rapegate about Bill Clinton serial rapes and coverup with Hillary’s assistance, Clintons war on women, rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed, power

“As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.”…David Schippers report to House Judiciary Committee

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Do a search on rapegate.

I did and found very little on the first 2 pages.

NewsMax, in the late nineties, thought it was an important story and had quite a few articles with rapegate in the title. Here are some of them:

February 3, 1999.

“Media Wags Circle the Wagons on Rapegate”

February 4, 1999.

“Rapegate Victim Slammed”

February 10, 1999

“‘NBC Anchor on Rapegate: ‘I’ve Recused Myself’”

February 19, 1999.

“Key Rapegate Facts First Reported by NewsMax.com”

August 3, 2000.

“Shays Reveals Details of Clinton’s ‘Horrific’ Broaddrick Rape”

January 13, 2001.

“L.A. Times Issues Rapegate Apology After NewsMax Report”

Those articles were scrubbed.

They can be found at Citizen News.

http://citizenwells.net

There are many more articles about Bill Clinton’s rapes on NewsMax as well and quite a few can be found at Citizen News.

The House Judiciary Committee Evidentiary Record from December 1998 mentions the following:

Travelgate
Commercegate
Chinagate
Filegate
IRSgate
Trustgate

But no mention of Rapegate.

So what is Rapegate and why has it fundamentally disappeared from the internet and the public’s consciousness?

overview.

From Breitbart September 2, 2015.

“New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone has a new book, The Clintons’ War on Women, and he spoke exclusively to Breitbart News about the revelations he is making about Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Stone compared his book to Peter Schweizer’s Clinton Cash, which “was about the financial crimes of the Clintons, [and] this book is about the non-financial crimes of the Clintons.” Stone is one of the best-known — and best-dressed — political insiders in New York.

“It’s a horrifying true story of rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed and power.”

Stone coauthored the book with Robert Morrow, a political researcher and historian. Based on their research, the two show how Bill and Hillary left a trail of assault accusations, intimidation, and cover-ups against women and children.

The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.

Hillary Clinton’s core agenda is a quest for power, even while she presents herself as champion of women’s issues, Stone says.

“If Hillary intends to build her campaign around an appeal to women, her campaign is built on quicksand,” said Stone. But “Hillary is a life-time abuser of women and her advocacy on women issues rings hollow,” he said.

The book includes details about Clinton’s alleged crimes in Arkansas, in the White House, during her term as Secretary of State, and at the Clinton Foundation, and concludes with revelations about Hillary’s current presidential campaign.

“She’s a life-long abuser of women. She denigrates, degrades and threatens those women who are unlucky enough to be the sexual assault victims of her husband, and that number, you know, is in the hundreds,” Stone said exclusively to Breitbart News.

He explained the book focuses on 14 individual cases in which Hillary hired private detectives who “threatened and silenced” Bill’s victims.

Stone also said she is not the champion for children she portrays herself to be either. “We present the evidence that it was Hillary Clinton …who gave the order at Waco that killed 26 innocent children,” Stone told Breitbart News, which he argues in his book. “Janet Reno was only Attorney General for two weeks at the time that the U.S. government assaulted the … compound in Waco,” he said.

“We produce congressional evidence from both the Senate and the House that it was Hillary who gave the order to proceed,” he declared. “Twenty-six innocent children died in that assault, which was completely unnecessary.”

“Hillary’s hypocrisy is stunning ” Stone stated. “The key to defeating Hillary is to prove who she really is to women voters.”

According to the breathless press release, Stone and Morrow make the following arguments throughout the book:

  • Bill’s  series of sexual assaults on Eileen Wellstone, Juanita Broaddrick , Carolyn Moffet, Liz Ward Gracen, Becky Brown , Helen Dowdy, Paula Jones, Kathy Fergusen, Christy Zercher and Kathleen Willey among dozens of others.
  • The details of Bill’s rape of 19-year-old Emily Wellstone, for which he was thrown out of Oxford.”

Read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/02/exclusive-roger-stone-touts-his-new-book-the-clintons-war-on-women/

Lest you believe the book is conjecture:

The catalyst, not the reason, for Bill Clinton being impeached was his sexual escapades in the White House with Monica Lewinsky. The Clinton’s lying, perjury, obstruction of justice and other actions led to impeachment and subsequently knowledge that Bill Clinton was a serial rapist.

“David P. Schippers is key to the downfall of Hillary Clinton”…Citizen Wells

Who is David Schippers?

“The more I drill down into the role of David Schippers, former Chief Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the Bill Clinton Impeachment investigation, the more I am convinced that his findings and statements about the Clintons will be the downfall of Hillary in her attempt to take the White House.

David P. Schippers is a good man, a lifelong Democrat who voted for Bill Clinton twice. No right wing conspirator, who criticizes members of both parties.

From the Washington Post April 1, 1998.

“When David P. Schippers took his 10 children to the nation’s capital in 1976, he made sure they made it to the Jefferson Memorial. The founding father remains a hero of his, because he entered the political arena out of a sense of duty.

“He’s a man who never wanted to be in politics,” Schippers said yesterday. “He felt he owed it to the country to get involved in politics.”

At 68, Schippers is entering the nation’s political fray for the first time as the House Judiciary Committee’s chief investigator. The post itself is controversial: Democrats suspect that Schippers’s hire, which Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.) announced late last week, marks the opening salvo in an impeachment crusade. Republicans say the Chicago lawyer will oversee the review of the Justice Department in connection with the agency’s first authorization in nearly two decades, but acknowledge privately that Schippers could also analyze any documents forwarded by independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr.

Like Jefferson, Schippers insists he is coming to the Hill reluctantly.

“I don’t seek this, I didn’t seek this, and it’s something that has to be done,” he said in his first interview since he was appointed.”

“The Cook County Democrat, who once ran, unsuccessfully, for Illinois Supreme Court, might seem like an unusual pick for Hyde, a Republican. They became friends when the two of them served on a panel investigating judicial corruption in Illinois. Schippers has no Hill or constitutional-law expertise, and established his reputation in the mid-1960s as chief of the Justice Department’s task force examining organized crime in Chicago.”

https://citizenwells.com/2016/08/26/david-p-schippers-key-to-downfall-of-hillary-clinton-from-exposing-rapegate-to-improper-immigrant-processing-hillary-evil-incarnate-white-house-used-the-ins-to-further-its-poli/

From the David Schippers Report to the House Judiciary Committee.

“On October 5, 1998, I came before this Committee to advise you of the results of our analysis and review of the Referral from the Office of the Independent Counsel. We concluded that there existed substantial and credible evidence of several separate events directly involving the President that COULD constitute grounds for impeachment. At that time I specifically limited my review and report to evidence of possible felonies. In addition, I asserted that the Report and analysis was merely a litany of crimes that MIGHT HAVE been committed.

On October 7, the House of Representatives passed Resolution 581 calling for an inquiry to determine whether the House should exercise its constitutional duty to impeach President William Jefferson Clinton.

Thereafter, this Committee heard testimony from several experts and other witnesses, including the Independent Counsel, Kenneth Starr.

Since that time, my staff and I, as requested, have conducted ongoing investigations and inquiries. We have received and reviewed additional information and evidence from the Independent Counsel, and have developed additional information from diverse sources.

Unfortunately, because of the extremely strict time limits placed upon us, a number of very promising leads had to be abandoned. We just ran out of time. In addition, many other allegations of possible serious wrongdoing cannot be presented publicly at this time by virtue of circumstances totally beyond our control.

For example, we uncovered more incidents involving probable direct and deliberate obstruction of justice, witness tampering, perjury and abuse of power. We were, however, informed both by the Department of Justice and by the Office of the Independent Counsel that to bring forth publicly that evidence at this time would seriously compromise pending criminal investigations that are nearing completion. We have bowed to their suggestion.”

“When I appeared in this Committee Room a little over two months ago, it was merely to analyze the Referral and report. Today, after our investigation, I have come to a point that I prayed I would never reach. It is my sorrowful duty now to accuse President William Jefferson Clinton of obstruction of justice, false and deliberately misleading statements under oath, witness tampering, abuse of power, and false statements to and obstruction of the Congress of the United States in the course of this very impeachment inquiry. Whether these charges are high crimes and misdemeanors and whether the President should be impeached is not for me to say or even to give an opinion. That is your job. I am merely going to set forth the evidence and testimony before you so that you can judge.

As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.

Before we get into the President’s lies and obstruction, it is important to place the events in the proper context. We have acknowledged all along that if this were only about sex, you would not now be engaged in this debate. But the manner in which the Lewinsky relationship arose and continued is important. It is illustrative of the character of the President and the decisions he made.”

David Schippers Report House Judiciary Committee, Majority chief investigative counsel for impeachment, Probable direct and deliberate obstruction of justice witness tampering perjury and abuse of power leads abandoned due to strict time limits

From NewsMax August 22, 2000 via Citizen News

“Bill Clinton tacitly admitted that he raped Juanita Broaddrick during a conversation with her husband in the mid-1980s, according to an account given to House impeachment investigators by Broaddrick herself, a new book claims.

David Schippers, the former Chicago mob-busting attorney selected by House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde to head the Clinton impeachment inquiry two years ago, offers the Clinton rape shocker in “Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment.”

Schippers was initially recruited by Hyde before the Lewinsky case broke, to conduct the first serious oversight investigation of the Justice Department in twenty years.

In that capacity, he uncovered other aspects of Clinton administration corruption that went far beyond the lies and obstruction in the Monica Lewinsky and Paula Jones cases. But when Starr sent over an impeachment report that focused exclusively on Sexgate, the constraints of time and the timidity of the GOP leadership left Schippers little choice but to make that the focus of the House impeachment probe.

The longtime Democrat who twice voted for Clinton hired two trusted investigators he knew from his days working with Chicago law enforcement. Seeking to build a case against Clinton that went beyond his lies and obstruction in the Lewinsky case, Schippers sent Diana Woznicki and John Kocoras to Arkansas in search of other Jane Does who had been pressured to deny a sexual relationship with Clinton.

“Within a day or two,” Schippers writes, “Diana reported to me about a woman in Arkansas, Juanita Broaddrick, who alleged that Clinton had raped her years earlier.”

Schippers’ first instinct was to ignore the unconfirmed rumors. It was to him “a shocking story, but nothing in itself that would affect our case in the Senate.”

Then Woznicki dropped a bombshell on her boss.

“Oh, one more thing that I picked up. She was subpoenaed by Jones lawyers. She filed an affidavit denying everything.”

Schippers’ reaction? “Bingo! That changed the whole picture.” If Broaddrick had been pressured to lie, it would be part of a pattern of obstruction of justice that the Senate couldn’t possibly ignore.

Once Schippers discovered that Starr had investigated Broaddrick’s charges, he requested any and all information the Office of Independent Counsel had on the case. House probers learned that Broaddrick’s charges were corroborated by several witness interviewed by the OIC.

At that point, Kocoras and Woznicki were dispatched again to Arkansas. During a meeting with Broaddrick and her lawyer, the Clinton rape accuser was reluctant to acknowledge the assault. But in a telephone conversation later that day, Broaddrick unburdened herself of the secret she had carried for 20 years.

For an hour and a half, the Arkansas businesswoman described the the terrifying experience to Woznicki, who had worked with rape victims during her days on the Chicago police force. When the two investigators returned to Washington, Woznicki told Schippers, “Juanita fits the pattern of the classic rape victim.””

Schippers Book Bombshell: Clinton acknowledged Broaddrick rape, Schippers pre-impeachment probe of Justice Dept uncovered Clinton INS plan to naturalize tens of thousands of immigrants, 75k made citizens under Clinton plan had arrest records, Newsmax August 22, 2000

From NewsMax February 19, 1999 via Citizen News.

“Did NBC News Save Clinton?”

“What might have happened had NBC News broadcast its Jan. 20 interview with alleged Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick during President Clinton’s impeachment trial?”

“It was the perception of Clinton’s invincible popularity that saved him at the end of the day, with normally reasonable senators like Robert Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, admitting that he was impeachably guilty of high crimes but not removable because of his public support.

Enter Juanita Broaddrick, who told her story to NBC’s Lisa Myers at the height of Clinton’s impeachment trial — only to see the network put her interview on ice for the duration.

NBC executives surely worried about the impact of Broaddrick’s rape allegation against Clinton as they ran out the clock. The Rapegate shocker threatened Clinton’s popularity as no other revelation had since the opening days of the Lewinsky scandal.

Here, the White House was faced with an allegation of violent sexual assault that eyewitnesses say left its victim hysterical, bruised, and bleeding. “It’s just about sex,” had worked for 12 months. How would “It’s just about rape” play in Peoria?

Certainly NBC remembered that when Clinton’s early Monicagate poll numbers went over the cliff, it really was just about sex. There was no semen-stained dress to prove Clinton’s perjury in the Paula Jones case. White House secretary Betty Currie had yet to tell Ken Starr’s grand jury about Clinton coaching her with lies “to refresh his memory.” And Monica herself wouldn’t turn state’s evidence for another six months.

It was just about sex between a 21-year-old girl and a 50-year-old president — in the same room where Lincoln had planned his Civil War strategy with Grant; where Roosevelt and Churchill decided the fate of the world 80 years later. And for a short few weeks, the public was repulsed and disgusted.

Nearly a year to the day after Clinton’s political lifesaving State of the Union address, NBC tentatively scheduled Juanita Broaddrick’s interview for broadcast. But three days earlier, Broaddrick had been warned there was trouble back at the ranch.

“The good news is, you’re credible,” Lisa Myers told her. “The bad news is, you’re very, very credible.” Network brass was panicking after interviewing five corroborating witnesses and putting Broaddrick through a background check from which she emerged, she was told, “squeaky clean.”

And there were other concerns. Though they’ve generally kept this news from the rest of the country, journalists know that the House vote to impeach Clinton was swayed by secret material stored in a locked and guarded evidence room in D.C.’s Gerald Ford Building.

This was the information House Majority Whip Tom DeLay referenced when he suggested that senators “pay a visit to the evidence room and you might just see 67 votes [to convict] appear out of thin air.” Congressman who have reviewed the information describe it as “horrific” and “nauseating.” One was reduced to tears.

But the Senate, hell-bent for acquittal, declined DeLay’s invitation.”

Did NBC News Save Clinton?, Delay of broadcast of interview with alleged Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick, Rapegate shocker threatened Clinton’s popularity, Lisa Myers To Broaddrick: The bad news is you’re very very credible, Newsmax February 19, 1999

 

There is much much more and more to come here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Advertisements

Larry Sinclair video, Hillary Supporters for McCain, Angry Hillary voters, Larry Sinclair Obama video, drugs, sex, downlow

There is a new Youtube video out about the Larry Sinclair drug and sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Many of the Hillary Clinton supporters do not like the way she has been treated and they refuse to vote for Barack Obama. These Hillary supporters are now voting for McCain. Here are some exerpts from their website and the Youtube video:

“Welcome to the website and forum! You can see from the distinctly nonprofessional look that this is not a PAC (Political Action Committee), not a professional political organization. Not yet, anyway.

No, what this is, is a place for other angry pissed-off Hillary voters just like you and I to come and think, talk, discuss, and then mobilize for November. Created by a lowly Hillary Clinton Campaign precinct captain and county and state delegate from a small central neighborhood in Las Vegas, with no other connection with the campaign whatsoever other than that.

First I was going to vote for McCain out of spite. Then I thought I could, that we all could, merely write in Hillary in November, and because she had more popular votes, could then decimate both Obama and McCain.

Then I found out that my own state Nevada does not allow write-in candidates! And that this is true of many states, and many other states have limitations on write-in candidates, like limiting to those who didn’t lose the primary. Absolutely absurd ridiculous limitations that have effectively throttled and destroyed true democracy in the US.

So coming to this point has been a long journey, and here is what I’ve based my own personal November decision on. If you agree, join us.”

“That’s why I’m voting McCain in November. Not only that, I’m, for the first time in my life, voting a straight GOP ticket, right down the line. Sorry, Harry Reid, Shelly Berkley, even though you supported Hillary Clinton, I deeply regret I can no longer support you. Message to Howard Dean and the DNC: Disenfranchise me and mine and the women of America with a loser candidate who can’t possibly win, and you’re in for the single most horrific surprise of your entire political life. Hell hath no fury like a Hillary Clinton supporter scorned. McCain is going to win with or without my vote, anyway. With or without our votes. It’s inevitable. What will prove not to be inevitable will be your Congressional majority which we will strive to destroy. You know, sometimes an animal has to chew off a limb to escape a trap to survive.”

Read more here:

 http://hillaryvotersformccain.com

 

Voice your concern about Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Limo driver, Multani, Larry Sinclair, Five Star Limousine Service, Chicago, drugs, sex, Obama down low, Citizen Wells blog, Sinclair news conference

There has been a lot of confusion and misinformation about the limo driver’s name that drove Larry Sinclair and Obama in November 1999 for a drug and sex encounter. I began reporting on the limo driver in March of 2008. I received an anonymous tip about the possible whereabouts of a driver with the last name of Multani. Larry Sinclair responded on my blog with a clarification. Soon after that I began a long series of email and phone conversations as I dug deeper into the Larry Sinclair allegations. I have come to know Larry Sinclair, the person, as well as his story. He has always been consistent and forthcoming with information.

Below is the series of events in regard to my posts and comments regarding the limo driver:

Post March 26, 2008

 Larry Sinclair has made allegations that he had multiple encounters with Barack Obama from November 3 through November 8 1999. One of the encounters was alleged to be in a limousine from 5 Star Limousine Service in Chicago. Sinclair states that the limousine driver’s name is P Multani. Sinclair has also stated that in the past he has helped illegal aliens. There was a Paramjit Singh Multani, from India, in this country illegally and he was in Chicago around the time of the alleged limousine encounter.

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/obama-larry-sinclair-limousine-p-multani-cocaine-gay-sex-illegal-aliens/

Comments:

Still in US …in Maryland working as taxi driver? // April 3, 2008 at 7:44 pm (edit)

http://webapp.psc.state.md.us/Intranet/Transport/TaxicabDriver.cfm?var=M

Name:Mr. Paramjit Singh Multani
Badge#:10475
Exp. Date:01/31/2009
Association:Checker Cab Association, Incorporated

This guy is a professional driver/chauffeur , not totally implausible that he could have driven a limo too?

Post April 7, 2008

Sinclair has stated in the past that he helped illegal aliens. He also stated that the name of the limo driver is P Multani. An illegal alien by the name of Paramjit Singh Multani was in this country illegally and a hearing was set for him in Chicago in 2000. This is near the time of the alleged encounter between Larry Sinclair and Barack Obama. Some one commented on this blog several days ago and pointed out that a Paramjit Singh Multani is a licensed taxi driver in Maryland. They provided a link to the site. Does anyone out there have any more information on this?

Name:Mr. Paramjit Singh Multani
Badge#:10475
Exp. Date:01/31/2009
Association:Checker Cab Association, Incorporated
** Update **

I have gotten a clarification from Larry Sinclair. Below are my questions to Larry followed by his response:

“Thought you should know I did not state the above was the limo drivers name. That is an assumption that internet warriors for Obama made and claimed.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair”

Hi Larry.
I am not trying to jeopardize your position.
Can you confirm or deny what this commenter on your blog
posted on Mar 20, 8:14 PM. It was posted by ravin kaur.

“When you were in Florida, you help him, Paramjit Singh Multani, come to the States? Yes? He arrested and ordered deported but did not show? Later he and wife try to get citizenship but her I-130 revoked cause his to fail and again order for him to deport out of Chicago? Final order 2000 Yes? He work for Limo service: was it for Nemcovic or Nastev?”

Citizen Wells

“ADDED BY LARRY:I believe I included a comment that this was an example of people putting other peoples names out there with no facts to back it up. I can state that no I did not help this individual enter the US nor did I ever state he was my limo driver or that he worked for five star. I will tell you flat out this is not the driver.”

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/p-multani-paramjit-singh-multani-larry-sinclair-barack-obama-november-4-1999-records-obama-not-in-senate/

Post June 26, 2008

There has been much confusion about the name of the Limo Driver for the alleged Larry Sinclair and Obama encounter in November 1999. The written news conference release, indicated the name was Paramjit Multani. The correct limo driver’s name is Jagir P Multani.

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/larry-sinclair-news-conference-limo-drivers-name-not-paramjit-multani-typo-error-limo-driver-was-jagir-p-multani-listen-to-news-conference/

I have spoken to Larry Sinclair about the limo driver on multiple occasions. He has been consistent with the above dialogue throughout the conversations.

Larry Sinclair’s blog site is:

http://larrysinclair0926.com


Obama, drugs, sex, Larry Sinclair, down low, Reverend Manning, Chicago chef rumors, Obama erection video, Obama revealed

First we had the allegations from Larry Sinclair about the drugs and gay sex encounter with Obama in November 1999.

Then a former Chicago chef and restaurant owner came forward to reveal the persistent rumors about Obama being on the down low from the gay community.

Then we find out about the strong Obama and William Ayers connection and the admission by Ayers that he had sex with male friends.

Then we find out about the really close ties to Lawrence Lessing, his use of the gay Jesus video and his attempts to blur the distinctions between gays and straights.

Then the Reverend Manning states that Obama and Jeremiah Wright are closet homosexuals and that he has solid proof.

Now we have a video of Obama displaying an erection to the male and female members of the press aboard a flight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsdHoAy4aM&feature=related

Do you still believe Larry Sinclair’s allegations are unbelievable?

Larry Sinclair Obama allegations, timeline, drugs, gay sex, November 3 1999, November 4 1999, November 8 1999

Larry Sinclair has alleged he had drug and gay sex encounters with Barack Obama in Chicago between November 3 and November 8 1999. Victor posted this comment on my blog today with the timeline and events of the alleged encounter as he has read and understands it. This is not directly from Larry Sinclair’s mouth but I know that Victor has been following the story closely:

“When Larry Sinclair arrive d in Chicago on 3rd November 1999 he intended to stay until 6th.
He then extended his stay to 8th.

Confirmation of his arrival, departure and request for an extension has been provided by the legal department of Choice International the company that owned the Comfort Inn, Gurney, Illinois where he stayed. The documents have been posted on LS blog.

He met Barack Obama on 6th in a lounge in downtown Chicago and went with him for a drive in the limousine Larry Sinclair had hired for the duration of his stay.

The limousine dropped off LS at his hotel on the night of 6th before taking BO back to wherever his car was parked.

BO returned to the hotel uninvited and unexpected on 7th.

If my memory serves, BO was missing from the senate for personal business on 4th and also on another day about that time.

On 6th he had his own glass pipe which he used to smoke crack. I understand crack is very addictive. Speculatively, if he were in a drug-taking mode at that time it could have begun on 4th and continued for several days. And there may have been a hangover effect after his last meeting with LS on 7th.”

If you would like more information on this story click here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

Vermont, Brattleboro VT, Marlboro VT, Bush Cheney indictment, impeached, arrest, drugs, idiots

First of all, I was in Vermont twice in 2007 and secondly, what I am about to say is not an attack or reference to the entire state of VT. However, Vermont is a haven for drug users and people with less than balanced thought patterns. The towns of Brattleboro and Marlboro just voted to indict President George W Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. Here is the actual statement that was voted on:
“Shall the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution, and publish said indictment for consideration by other municipalities? And shall it be the law of the Town of Brattleboro that the Brattleboro Police, pursuant to the above-mentioned indictments, arrest and detain George Bush and Richard Cheney in Brattleboro if they are not duly impeached, and extradite them to other authorities that may reasonably contend to prosecute them.”

More can be read about the meeting here:

http://www.brattleboro.com/

Here is some more information from a local news source:
“Up in the town of Marlboro, VT, population 1000, the town constable may have a new job. If President George W. Bush, or Vice President Dick Cheney should happen to stop by there, perhaps to pick up some freshly made maple syrup or maple sugar candy, he’d have to arrest them. Last night, the citizens of Marlboro voted in their annual town meeting to indict both men for war crimes, obstruction of justice and perjury. The vote was 43-25, with three abstentions.

Residents of nearby Brattleboro, population 12,000, did the same, voting 2012-1795.”

Read more about this article here:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_dave_lin_080305_busting_bush__26_co__i.htm

Now for my position. I cannot speak for the entire state of NC, but I believe many of the good people of North Carolina are of the same beliefs. I consider this an insult and attack on the president and vice president of the United States, our president and vice president. I would think twice about entering the state of NC. Remember, some of you talk a good talk, but we have a strong tradition of fighting for the establishment and safety of this country. This goes back prior to, during and after the American Revolution and includes my direct ancestors. I condemn your action and consider you cowards and traitors. Clear?