Why has Obama employed a legion of private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?…Citizen Wells and millions of Americans
Glenn Beck, you are a lucky man. We have been trying to figure out for over a year why you have avoided touching the Obama eligibility issues. It is now widely believed that the Saudi ownership of a large part of Fox is the main reason. If it were not for your being popular and consistently revealing the truth about Obama and his associates, you would be toast. Your recent insults of average, hard working, concerned Americans was unacceptable. We are giving you a chance to wake up and apologize.
The following is an email recently sent to Glenn Beck. It is well written and well documented.
“A question of integrity
January 12, 2010
The following e-mail was sent to Glenn Beck on January 8, 2010.
Dear Mr Beck,
A colleague forwarded to me the following e-mail, received from you:
From: Glenn Beck
To: Listener
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 2:19 PM
Subject: Glenn returns fired up, ready to go
“Birthers Birthing
Just like the notorious ‘seminar callers’ Rush talks about, there is a new type of seminar caller out there trying to get on talk radio: the birther. Sure, there are plenty of idiots out there who actually think Barack Obama was not born in the United States and this is a way to get him impeached. But most reasonable people don’t believe that. It’s so ridiculous that it’s actually a good distraction for Obama, because it’s an easy win for him and distracts from the real issues. Is that why so many birthers seem to be on different talk shows lately? Glenn explains. ( Transcript, Insider Audio)”
It is both shocking and appalling, Mr Beck, that you would write, much less send, something like this. That you apparently did is making scores of Americans question not only your veracity but also your integrity.
There is no issue more important to this nation than the question of Also Known As (AKA) Obama’s eligibility to the office he holds.
If, as the evidence more than adequately indicates, AKA is not eligible to the office he holds, the United States Constitution is in great peril as is every right guaranteed the people of this nation under that document, including your right of free speech under the First Amendment. Whether AKA legitimately holds the office of president is of paramount importance to every issue you address regarding his Marxist agenda.
You refer to the people gravely concerned by what, by all indications, is an egregious breach of our Constitution, as “birthers.”
But I ask you, can you prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that AKA is eligible to the office he holds?
Have you seen AKA’s actual birth certificate issued at the time of his birth? Have you? Because, if you have, you are the only one, besides AKA, who has seen it.
AKA admits in his book, Dreams from my father, that he found his actual birth certificate among papers in his maternal grandparents home, in Hawaii, when he lived with them. That being the case, Mr Beck, why the need to produce a laser printed document? Why not simply produce his actual birth certificate as John McCain did when his eligibility was questioned?
But we have seen the pictures of the Certification of Live Birth? That we have. And you know what, Mr Beck, they prove absolutely nothing. “Here officer, let me show you the picture I have of my drivers’ license; it is no doubt just as acceptable as my actual drivers’ license!”
I have to ask, have you actually seen the Certification of Live Birth that AKA has claimed is his birth certificate? No, I don’t mean pictures, I mean the actual document? If you haven’t, then how do you know it’s legit? In the day and age of PhotoShop, how do you know it wasn’t forged, especially in light of the fact that the digital files behind all those pictures on the internet show the pictures have been altered?
Don’t you find it rather odd that AKA has spent close to $2 million trying to keep his actual birth certificate, which he has, concealed while John McCain, when the question of eligibility arose, whipped his out for any and all to look at?
You’ve “spent minutes pondering that question”? Really? Does that have more to do with mental acuity or does it have more to do with the clown persona you seem to like to exude?
You have been quoted as saying that you believe those requesting that AKA produce his actual birth certificate are discrediting themselves. Really? On what do you base your assertion?
Do you base it on the fact that AKA has admitted he was a dual citizen at birth? A dual citizen is not natural-born. A natural born citizen is born of two American parents on American soil, a fact which AKA acknowledged when he became a co-sponsor of SR 511, passed by the Senate, and providing a “sense” of the Senate regarding John McCain’s eligibility.
While AKA may have been born on American soil, his father was a British subject. He is not natural-born and is not, therefore, eligible to the office of president under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution.
What about that do you find so hard to comprehend?
That, above and beyond all your clueless comments and accusations, is the crux of the situation.
But there is more that does play into this matter beyond the dual citizenship. While it secondary to the fact of dual citizenship and ineligibility to the office of president, it is relevant to the matter.
How do you address the fact that when AKA claims he was born, there was a law in effect, in Hawaii, which allowed for the birth registration of foreign-born children? That law was not repealed until 1972. What this means, Mr Beck, is that until said time as AKA’s actual birth certificate, which he has, is produced and examined, where he was actually born is up for grabs. The claim that he was born in Honolulu, in the face of that law, means nothing.
If he was born outside the United States, there is no question that he is not eligible.
So, please, tell us on what you base your assertion? Or is the case more that you don’t want to be bothered by the facts?
You assert that AKA is an American. He may be an American but that does not equate to being natural born. But then, there has been no proof presented that he is an American, so your assertion is not based on fact.
There is yet more.
In Ann Soetoro v Lolo Soetoro, filed August 1980 when AKA was 19, it is stated that AKA is a “dependent [of the respondent, Lolo Soetoro] for the purposes of education.” How is it possible for AKA to be considered a legal dependent of Lolo Soetoro absent AKA being legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro? You are aware, are you not, of the registration of AKA at the Fransiskus Assisi Primary School in Jakarta, listing his name as Barry Soetoro and his citizenship as Indonesian? That registration is dated January 1, 1967.
Was AKA, at the age of 19, named as a dependent of Lolo Soetoro for the purposes of education, so he could obtain, as an Indonesian citizen, foreign student scholarships to Occidental? Is that why his Occidental records, Columbia records and Harvard records have all been sealed?
And this leads to another question.
If ever eligible to do so, where are the legal documents wherein AKA reclaimed his American citizenship at age 18, one year before he was listed as a dependent of Lolo Soetoro in the Soetoro divorce papers? Have you seen the legal documents where AKA reclaims his American citizenship? If you have, you would be the first because no one else has.
AKA pledged, while campaigning, to be transparent. That being the case, Mr Beck, why has AKA, as no other president before him, sealed every record that would divulge his past? If AKA has nothing to worry about, has nothing to hide, why has he deliberately sealed his past from public view?
You have claimed those who have addressed the eligibility issue are a bunch of “idiots” hatched by the AKA camp to sideline more important issues.
If there is an “idiot,” it’s definitely not those you erroneously call “birthers.”
There is no issue more important to the very documents on which this nation was founded, than the question of AKA’s eligibility to the office of president. If he is not our legitimate president, then every bill, every executive order, ever document he has signed is null and void, including the money appropriated to bail out his Wall Street buddies and benefactors.
And if he is not eligible to the office of president, a constitutional crisis exists.
You claim to stand for the Constitution. You rail against graft and corruption; against dishonesty in government; against the bureaucracy that spins the truth. Yet you believe that somehow, through all of that, and in the face of the evidence, the sealing of documents, the hiding of records, the scrubbing bubbles being applied to the internet to cleanse it of anything remotely connected to his past, that he is somehow telling the truth.
Are you really so naïve?
In the end, your vitriol aimed at those concerned that our constitution is being shredded really says more about you than about those you take aim at. If there is anyone doing the bidding of the AKA camp, it isn’t those concerned about a man sitting in the Oval Office, occupying the White House, who does so in violation of the United States Constitution, placing this nation in peril and endangering the rights of every American, you included.
If there is one issue that is more important than any other, it is the issue of AKA’s eligibility to the office he holds.
Only those augmenting AKA’s Marxist agenda are complicit in keeping the eligibility issue pushed under the rug.
Note: As of this posting, Glenn Beck has not responded; not that I expected he would. Has Glenn Beck been threatened if he speaks on the eligibility issue as other radio and television personalities have apparently been threatened? It would stand to reason that he has. It also stands to reason that the almighty dollar is much more important to Glenn Beck than what is right. And therein lies the problem most true patriots have with those who purport themselves to be leaders in the cause of liberty.
Postscript: The issue of the two social security numbers known to have been used by AKA, one issued in Connecticut, the other in Michigan, also play into the equation. If AKA is a legal citizen, why would he need to use social security numbers not issued to him?”
Posted with permission of Lynn.
Citizen WElls 