Category Archives: FBI

Michael Sussman indictment by John Durham explained, Sept 17, 2021, Acted on behalf of “Tech Executive” and Hillary Clinton Campaign, “continuing to co-ordinate with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign.” 

Michael Sussman indictment by John Durham explained, Sept 17, 2021, Acted on behalf of “Tech Executive” and Hillary Clinton Campaign, “continuing to co-ordinate with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign.”

“The facts that we know of in the murder of the DNC staffer, Seth Rich, was that he was gunned down blocks from his home on July 10, 2016. Washington Metro police detectives claim that Mr. Rich was a robbery victim, which is strange since after being shot twice in the back, he was still wearing a $2,000 gold necklace and watch. He still had his wallet, key and phone. Clearly, he was not a victim of robbery.”…Retired Admiral James A. Lyons March 1, 2018

“Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray May 9, 2019

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

From GateWay Pundit September 17, 2021.

“Indictment Shows that John Durham Is Going After More People than Michael Sussmann”

“Durham’s indictment of Sussmann lays out the foundation of a conspiracy. Michael Sussman was indicted for lying to the FBI about the source of information he gave the Bureau. He claimed he got it independently. He did not. It was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and her campaign. The indictment essentially charges Sussmann with sending the FBI on a wild goose chase:

The FBI had, in fact, initiated an investigation of these allegations in response to a meeting that MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN, the defendant herein– a lawyer at a major international law firm (“ Law Firm -1”, i.e. Perkins Coie) – requested and held with the FBI General Counsel on or about September 19, 2016 at FBI Headquarters in the District of Columbia. SUSSMANN provided to the FBI General Counsel three “ white papers” along with data files allegedly containing evidence supporting the existence of this purported secret communications channel.During the meeting, SUSSMANN lied about the capacity in which he was
providing the allega to the FBI Specifically, SUSSMANN stated falsely that he was not doing his work on the aforementioned allegations “ any client,” which led the FBI General Counsel to understand that SUSSMANN was acting as a good citizen merely passing along information , not as a paid advocate or political operative . In fact, and as alleged in further detail below, this statement was intentionally false and misleading because, in assembling and conveying
these allegations, SUSSMANN acted on behalf of specific clients, namely, ( i ) a U.S. technology industry executive (“ Tech Executive- 1”) at a U.S. Internet company “Internet Company”) , and ( ii) the Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign (the “Clinton Campaign”).

That “Tech Executive” and the Hillary Clinton Campaign are now possible targets. The critical question is whether or not Sussmann was acting on his own. The indictment states he was acting at the behest of the Tech Executive and Hillary. It would be prosecutorial incompetence if they had not already be interviewed and evidence collected against them.

Paragraph 6 of the indictment gives a strong indication of how Durham and this team view Sussmann’s lie:

Had the FBI uncovered the origins of the relevant data and analysis, and as alleged below, it might have learned, among other things , that ( i ) in compiling and analyzing the Russian Bank- 1 allegations, Tech Executive- 1 had exploited his access to non-public data at multiple Internet companies to conduct opposition research concerning Trump; ( ii) in furtherance of these efforts, Tech Executive- 1 had enlisted, and was continuing to enlist, the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract ; and ( ) SUSSMANN , Tech Executive, and Law Firm- 1 had coordinated, and were continuing to coordinate, with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign with regard to the data and written materials
that SUSSMANN gave to the FBI and the media.

First, pay close attention to the indictment’s claim that “non public data” from a “federal government research contract” was being used to bait the FBI. I believe that is a criminal act. Second, the indictment makes it very clear that Sussmann, the Tech Executive and Perkins Coie did not just commit one act of conspiracy. Nope. They were “continuing to co-ordinate with representatives and agents of the Clinton Campaign.” This means it was not just one person working on the Clinton Campaign. It was many people.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/indictment-shows-john-durham-going-people-michael-sussmann/

hillarydisabledorlando

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Seth Rich records release FBI given until July 24, 2021, Over 5 years since Rich was murdered, Huddleston v FBI, “Given _________, it is conceivable that an individual or group would want to pay for his death.”

Seth Rich records release FBI given until July 24, 2021, Over 5 years since Rich was murdered, Huddleston v FBI, “Given _________, it is conceivable that an individual or group would want to pay for his death.”

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

From Huddleston v FBI May 7, 2021.

“MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Second Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines (Dkt. [21]) is hereby GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order in this case is amended as follows: April 23, 2021 First Production, May 24, 2021 Second Production, June 24, 2021 Third Production, July 24, 2021 Final Production. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/7/2021. (filed: 05/07/2021)”

https://www.docketbird.com/court-cases/Huddleston-v-Federal-Bureau-of-Investigation/txed-4:2020-cv-00447

The FBI has been given until July 24, 2021 to produce all records related to Seth Rich.

That will be over 5 years after his murder.

From Citizen Wells April 24, 2021.

From Attorney Ty Clevenger April 23, 2021.

“This afternoon the FBI finally released records about murdered DNC employee Seth Rich and the 2016 theft of Democratic National Committee emails that were later published by Wikileaks. Those documents provide new information, but generally raise more questions than answers.

Of 576 relevant pages identified by the FBI, only 68 were produced, and most of those 68 pages are heavily redacted. They reference Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, Richard Gates, Donald Trump, Jr., Jay Sekulow, and Jerome Corsi, among others.

I haven’t had time to thoroughly review the documents, but here are a few things that stand out:

  • On page 64, a November 11, 2017 memo from FBI’s Boston Field Office is almost completely redacted, but the last sentence reads as follows: “Given _________, it is conceivable that an individual or group would want to pay for his death.”
  • A witness interview form begins on page 65, and it appears to be the interview of former Asst. U.S. Attorney Deborah Sines, the prosecutor assigned to the Seth Rich murder case. [Continued on p.2]

Page 66 of that interview reads as follows: ““After the homicide, ____ took Rich’s personal laptop to his house in ____. ____ was not aware of if _____ deleted or changed anything on Rich’s laptop.” I suspect this is referring to Aaron Rich, brother of Seth, and it begs a question: why would a private citizen be allowed to carry away evidence relevant to a murder investigation? Why was this not immediately given to the police rather than taken to somebody’s house? And the government is not aware of whether this private citizen deleted anything from the laptop? That seems like an important thing to figure out.”

“I reported last December that the NSA was withholding records about Seth Rich, and my inside source tells me it’s more than 32 pages. Regardless of the number of pages, I think we can piece together what happened. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we know that the NSA intercepts and stores virtually every electronic communication in or out of the United States. The agency is supposed to store all of that information without looking at it, and the data is supposed to be mined only upon request from an authorized entity.

I suspect Robert Mueller’s staff asked the NSA to mine the data for communications between Seth Rich (possibly Aaron Rich) and Wikileaks, and I suspect the NSA provided 32 pages of responsive records to Mueller. Now both agencies want to hide the contents of those 32 pages. Why?

If you’re discouraged by all of the redactions and withheld pages, don’t be. I plan to ask U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant to review unredacted copies of all of these documents to determine whether information is improperly being withheld. Judge Mazzant is a straight shooter, and I suspect he will grant my request.”

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Seth Rich records released in Huddleston v FBI April 23, 2021, 68 heavily redacted pages out of 576 produced, Attorney Ty Clevenger on laptop taken: “I suspect this is referring to Aaron Rich”

Seth Rich records released in Huddleston v FBI April 23, 2021, 68 heavily redacted pages out of 576 produced, Attorney Ty Clevenger on laptop taken: “I suspect this is referring to Aaron Rich”

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

From Attorney Ty Clevenger April 23, 2021.

“This afternoon the FBI finally released records about murdered DNC employee Seth Rich and the 2016 theft of Democratic National Committee emails that were later published by Wikileaks. Those documents provide new information, but generally raise more questions than answers.

Of 576 relevant pages identified by the FBI, only 68 were produced, and most of those 68 pages are heavily redacted. They reference Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, Richard Gates, Donald Trump, Jr., Jay Sekulow, and Jerome Corsi, among others.

I haven’t had time to thoroughly review the documents, but here are a few things that stand out:

  • On page 64, a November 11, 2017 memo from FBI’s Boston Field Office is almost completely redacted, but the last sentence reads as follows: “Given _________, it is conceivable that an individual or group would want to pay for his death.”
  • A witness interview form begins on page 65, and it appears to be the interview of former Asst. U.S. Attorney Deborah Sines, the prosecutor assigned to the Seth Rich murder case. [Continued on p.2]

Page 66 of that interview reads as follows: ““After the homicide, ____ took Rich’s personal laptop to his house in ____. ____ was not aware of if _____ deleted or changed anything on Rich’s laptop.” I suspect this is referring to Aaron Rich, brother of Seth, and it begs a question: why would a private citizen be allowed to carry away evidence relevant to a murder investigation? Why was this not immediately given to the police rather than taken to somebody’s house? And the government is not aware of whether this private citizen deleted anything from the laptop? That seems like an important thing to figure out.”

“I reported last December that the NSA was withholding records about Seth Rich, and my inside source tells me it’s more than 32 pages. Regardless of the number of pages, I think we can piece together what happened. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we know that the NSA intercepts and stores virtually every electronic communication in or out of the United States. The agency is supposed to store all of that information without looking at it, and the data is supposed to be mined only upon request from an authorized entity.

I suspect Robert Mueller’s staff asked the NSA to mine the data for communications between Seth Rich (possibly Aaron Rich) and Wikileaks, and I suspect the NSA provided 32 pages of responsive records to Mueller. Now both agencies want to hide the contents of those 32 pages. Why?

If you’re discouraged by all of the redactions and withheld pages, don’t be. I plan to ask U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant to review unredacted copies of all of these documents to determine whether information is improperly being withheld. Judge Mazzant is a straight shooter, and I suspect he will grant my request.”

Read more:

More on Huddleston v FBI here:

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

From Attorney Lin Wood on Telegram

“As I have earlier made clear, I found the whistleblower interview regarding Chief Justice Roberts, former Vice President Pence and other high ranking officials to be credible.

Given the seriousness of his statements, I made the transcript public and also provided the thumb drive to the United States Secret Service, the State Bar of Georgia, the Lawyers Club of Atlanta President and members of its Executive Committee, Mercer Law School, Mercer Law School Dean Cathy Cox, and the District Court of Colorado Bar.

Are the allegations of the whistleblower being investigated?

With the exception of the Secret Service, all of the other recipients of the whistleblower interview have to my knowledge done nothing except to falsely smear me.

I was just the messenger. I only did what I felt was my duty as a law-abiding citizen, lawyer, and officer of the court. And for that, members of the legal profession seek to destroy me.

I think you understand exactly what is going on here. I do.”

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explains why Lin Wood’s whistleblower is absolutely credible

FROM A LIN WOOD WHISTLEBLOWER TESTIMONY TRANSCRIBED MARCH 1, 2021.

· “I started providing this in 2005, and in 2008 I
13· started working directly with Rod Rosenstein in Baltimore,
14· and because of the access with the other agencies, the FBI,
15· for instance, would come for corroboration of something they
16· were working on, or just to ask questions, if I’d seen
17· something like this, if this related to anything.· Then it
18· grew from there.
19· · · · · · Because of the undercover nature of many of the
20· investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism
21· within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and
22· access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod
23· Rosenstein.”

· “INTERVIEWEE:· · · · That group, I mean, they’re all
13· interconnected one way or another.· That particular group was
14· Rod, VP Pence, Paul Ryan.· That was the core of that group.
15· Rod was in there, but that was the core of it.· It was an
16· attempt, where Rod was the brilliant legal mind behind it, to
17· remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment.”

“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts — a lot
24· of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as
25· favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people.
·2· · · · · · We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief
·3· Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but
·4· it was also — Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type
·5· to various agencies around the world.· They used his
·6· information.· They exploited it for their own good.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/05/lin-wood-whistleblower-transcripts-transcribed-mar-1-2021-re-justice-roberts-mike-pence-rod-rosenstein-et-al-ref-in-feb-9-us-district-court-affidavit/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Seth Rich update FBI sat on laptop, Attorney Clevenger: ” I’m increasingly convinced ….Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham were double agents”, Jan 14, 2021

Seth Rich update FBI sat on laptop, Attorney Clevenger: ” I’m increasingly convinced ….Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham were double agents”, Jan 14, 2021

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

From Attorney Ty Clevenger January 14, 2021.

“The Central Intelligence Agency will neither confirm nor deny that it fabricated the Russian “fingerprints” in Democratic National Committee emails published in 2016 by Wikileaks and “Guccifer 2.0,” and the FBI implicitly acknowledged today that it never reviewed the contents of DNC employee Seth Rich’s laptop despite gaining custody of the laptop after his murder.

The revelations came in two separate Freedom of Information Act lawsuits filed by my clients in the Eastern District of Texas. For those of you who live under a rock, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange strongly implied in a 2016 interview that the leaked DNC emails came from Mr. Rich, while the political / bureaucratic / media establishment has steadfastly maintained that the emails were hacked by agents of Russia.

The latest admissions blow a hole in the government / media narrative, suggesting that federal officials not only ignored Seth Rich’s role in the leaks, but fraudulently shifted the blame to Russia.

In The Transparency Project v. Department of Justice, et al., my client asked to see records indicating whether the CIA or its Directorate of Digital Innovation, its contractors, etc. inserted Russian “fingerprints” into the metadata of the emails that were released publicly. (You can review the entire request by clicking here and reading Paragraph 11).”

“I don’t know why I didn’t realize it at the time, but the FBI was telling me that it had no idea what was on Seth Rich’s computer, and that’s because the FBI had never looked at his computer.

If, as we are told, Mr. Rich was killed in a “botched robbery” that was only investigated by local police, then why would the FBI take custody of his laptop? And why would the FBI take custody of evidence and then never review it? (Maybe we should ask Hunter Biden, as I suspect his laptop was kept on the same shelf as Seth’s.)

You may recall from my December 9, 2020 post that former Attorney General Bill Barr and Special Counsel John Durham steadfastly refused to consider any information about Seth Rich. The whole subject was arbitrarily off limits, and I’m increasingly convinced that’s because Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham were double agents. They convinced President Trump that they were aggressively pursuing the “Russian collusion” hoax, but in reality they were just running out the clock.”

Read more:

https://lawflog.com/?p=2458

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Seth Rich update part 2, Huddleston v FBI filed Dec 30, 2020 by Attorney Ty Clevenger, “acted in the utmost bad faith” 3 years, Who or what is FBI protecting?

Seth Rich update part 2, Huddleston v FBI filed Dec 30, 2020 by Attorney Ty Clevenger, “acted in the utmost bad faith” 3 years, Who or what is FBI protecting?

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

Yesterday we presented “show stopper” evidence from Attorney Ty Clevenger.

“The National Security Agency is hiding records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to one of my sources, who informed me yesterday that the records are classified as a special access program (the highest level of classification) because they include intercepted communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/30/seth-rich-update-dec-30-2020-nsa-hiding-records-between-seth-rich-and-julian-assange-intercepted-communications-between-rich-and-assange/

Something else very important happened yesterday.

Filed by Attorney Ty Clevenger December 30, 2020.

Brian Huddleston v FBI

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY

“Under normal circumstances, the Plaintiff would not oppose an extension of time to respond to document requests. These are not, however, normal circumstances. As set forth below, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) has acted in the utmost bad faith over a period of three years, going so far as perpetrate frauds on two federal courts. The Plaintiff therefore urges the Court to grant the Defendants significantly less time than they requested, and he further moves the Court to order the Defendants to explain the reasons for their delay.”

“The timing of Mr. Rich’s murder, and the fact that he worked for the DNC,
quickly led to suspicions that his murder might be connected to the transfer of thousands of DNC emails to Wikileaks. Id. The publication of those emails upended the Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, id., and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange strongly inferred that the emails were obtained from Mr. Rich. See “Julian Assange on Seth Rich,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg. Mr. Assange’s claim contradicted the narrative promoted by the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, i.e., that “Russian hackers” were responsible for obtaining and transferring the DNC emails to Wikileaks, and Mr. Assange’s claim is controversial even now.”

“Argument
When Mr. Huddleston submitted his FOIA request on April 9, 2020, he did not
give the FBI the option of playing dumb. As the Court can see from Mr. Huddleston’s letter (Doc. No. 3, internal exhibit 1), he expressly referenced the laptop as well as the correspondence about Mr. Rich that the FBI had accidentally released from the Washington Field Office. Now, after more than three years of delay and deception, the FBI has finally admitted that it has thousands of records pertaining to Mr. Rich, not to mention his laptop, yet it asks this Court to delay matters even further. The Defendants
purport to ask this Court for a three-month stay, but in reality they are asking this court for an indefinite delay. According to the Court’s October 23, 2010 Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 9), the Defendants’ production was due two days ago, yet the Defendants ask the Court to wait three months before even deciding when document production should begin.

Given the FBI’s long history of deception and bad faith, the Court should not
countenance vague and open-ended requests for additional time. If there is an FBI report about communications between Seth Rich and Wikileaks, then the FBI should be able to locate that report immediately. The FBI should be ordered to produce any such report within seven days of the Court’s order, which should give the agency enough time to make redactions (the parties can fight over the redactions later). Furthermore, the FBI should begin a rolling production of responsive materials not later than January 29, 2021, to be completed not later than March 31, 2021. The Plaintiff primarily is interested in records indicating whether Seth Rich played a role in leaking DNC emails to Wikileaks.
Accordingly, the FBI should be directed to focus its initial efforts on such records. Finally, the FBI official responsible for this matter should be directed to explain under oath why the search has taken so long and why the agency needs additional time. ”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.197917/gov.uscourts.txed.197917.11.0.pdf

Who or what is the FBI protecting?

Hillary Clinton?

And where was Attorney General Barr?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

Seth Rich update Dec 30, 2020, NSA hiding records between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, Intercepted communications between Rich and Assange

Seth Rich update Dec 30, 2020, NSA hiding records between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, Intercepted communications between Rich and Assange

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

From Attorney Ty Clevenger December 30, 2020.

“National Security Agency hiding communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange

The National Security Agency is hiding records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to one of my sources, who informed me yesterday that the records are classified as a special access program (the highest level of classification) because they include intercepted communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

Meanwhile, I’ve been authorized to release the transcript of a July 15, 2020 deposition of Pulitzer-Prize-winning journalist Sy Hersh, wherein Mr. Hersh is forced to admit that he did speak with a senior intelligence official about an FBI report about Mr. Rich and Wikileaks. That contradicts much of what Mr. Hersh has said publicly since early 2017 (more on that below).

As my regular readers know, Mr. Rich was murdered in Washington, D.C. on July 10, 2016, and shortly thereafter Wikileaks published thousands of DNC emails that were very embarrassing to then-Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. On August 9, 2016, Mr. Assange intimated that the DNC emails were obtained from Mr. Rich, not Russian hackers.

If you doubt my source, recall that three weeks ago — after three years of denials — the FBI was finally forced to admit that it had thousands of records about Mr. Rich, as well as his laptop. Meanwhile, virtually no one in official Washington has lifted a finger to help.

On May 7, 2020, for example, I sent a letter to Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell asking him to de-classify the NSA’s records about Mr. Rich, and I copied the letter to Republican Senators Chuck Grassley, Lindsey Graham, and Ron Johnson, as well as Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. Mr. Grenell left office shortly thereafter, so I sent it with a cover letter to current Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on June 2, 2020.

To date, no one has responded to the letter. Absolutely no one. And for reasons that I do not yet fully understand, none of the Republicans in Congress (or even in the Trump Administration) are willing to go anywhere near the subject of Seth Rich. It’s like the last bus stop before Pizzagate (maybe I need to start looking into that, too).”

Read more:

https://lawflog.com/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Seth Rich update Dec 17, 2020 Huddleston v FBI, FBI requests 3 more months after sitting on laptop over 4 years, Attorney Ty Clevenger update, No botched robbery

Seth Rich update Dec 17, 2020 Huddleston v FBI, FBI requests 3 more months after sitting on laptop over 4 years, Attorney Ty Clevenger update, No botched robbery

“And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”...Attorney Ty Clevenger

“They found, what he had done, he [Seth Rich] had submitted a series of documents, emails from DNC — and, by the way, all this shit about the DNC, you know, was it a ‘hack’ or wasn’t it a ‘hack’ — whatever happened, it was the Democrats themselves wrote this shit, you know what I mean? All I know is that, he offered a sample, he sends a sample, you know, I am sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money’. Later Wikileaks did get the password [SETH RICH DID SELL WIKILEAKS ACCESS INTO HIS COMPUTER.] He had a drop-box, a [password-]protected drop-box, which isn’t hard to do.”…Seymour Hersh

” So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

What do Seth Rich and Hunter Biden have in common?

They both had their laptops sat on by the FBI delaying investigations which could have impacted the 2020 elections.

Huddleston v FBI 

Filed June 1, 2020.

“5. On April 9, 2020, the Plaintiff submitted a FOIA request to the FBI via
facsimile. A true and correct copy of that FOIA request is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference. The Plaintiff requested the opportunity to view the following:
All data, documents, records, or communications (electronic or otherwise) created or obtained since January 1, 2016 that discuss or reference Seth Rich or Aaron Rich. This would include, but is not limited to, all data, documents, records, or communications in the Washington Field Office, Computer Analysis Response Team (“CART”), and any other “cyber” unit within the FBI.

All data, documents, records, or communications regarding any person or entity’s attempt to hack into Seth Rich’s electronic or internet accounts (e.g., email) after his death.

All data downloaded from all electronic devices that belonged to Seth Rich as well as all data, documents, records or communications indicating how the devices were obtained and who was responsible for downloading the information.

All data, documents, communications, records or other evidence indicating
whether Seth Rich, Aaron Rich, or any other person or persons were involved in
transferring data from the Democratic National Committee to Wikileaks in 2016,
either directly or through intermediaries. This request includes, but is not limited to, any reports from CrowdStrike, Inc. that were obtained by the FBI while assisting Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.197917/gov.uscourts.txed.197917.1.0.pdf

From Attorney Ty Clevenger December 9, 2020.

“FBI changes story, finally admits it has thousands of pages of documents about Seth Rich

After three years of claiming that it could not find any records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, the FBI admitted today that it has thousands of pages of information about him, further admitting that it has custody of his laptop.

So what changed between then and now? Here’s an excerpt from the email that I received this morning from an attorney representing the FBI against my client, Brian Huddleston, in Huddleston v. FBI, Case No. 4:20-CV-00447 (E.D. Tex.):

FBI has completed the initial search identifying approximately 50 cross-reference serials, with attachments totaling over 20,000 pages, in which Seth Rich is mentioned.  FBI has also located leads that indicate additional potential records that require further searching.  At this time, FBI anticipates processing  only the pages where Seth Rich is mentioned, along with perhaps another page or two in each situation to provide context.  The issue right now with this batch of documents is the amount of labor required to ingest all of the material so that the responsive pages will, first, be in a page format, secondly, can be identified from among the thousands of non-responsive pages, and finally, be processed.

FBI is also currently working on getting the files from Seth Rich’s personal laptop into a format to be reviewed.   As you can imagine, there are thousands of files of many types.  The goal right now is to describe, generally, the types of files/personal information contained in this computer.  Furthermore, the FBI will continue to evaluate the responsiveness of these files under the FOIA.”

And why is Fox News working so hard to kill this story? I wish I could say more “about Fox’s behind-the-scenes treachery — and someday hopefully I will — but rest assured that Malia Zimmerman’s May 17, 2017 story about Mr. Rich was fully vetted by senior Fox management. I repeatedly encouraged Fox’s attorneys to postpone settlement discussions with Seth Rich’s parents until I obtained the FBI records (my client, Ed Butowsky, was a co-defendant with Fox), but Fox was hellbent on settling the case in October / November. That’s around the time Rupert Murdoch publicly joined forces with Joe Biden. Fox had a very strong defense, yet it rolled over and played dead, settling the lawsuit and then firing Ms. Zimmerman. Sooner or later, the full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family.”

Read more:

https://lawflog.com/?p=2410&page=2

Huddleston v FBI 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES

Filed December 16, 2020.

“In summary, FBI has made significant progress in the search, but there is still
much work that lies ahead, including (1) processing the approximately 50 crossreferences (with thousands of pages to ingest and sort through), (2) undertaking some level of review of the personal laptop, and (3) completing all remaining searches. Unfortunately, these efforts are hampered by FBI FOIA office’s reduction to a 50% staffing posture due to Covid. [Exhibit A: Declaration of Michael G. Seidel].”

“In light of the status of the searches and the work left to be done, Defendants
propose an additional three months to complete the tasks described in Section II, up to and including March 29, 2021. At that time, Defendants will provide the Court with an updated search status and propose a production schedule.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.197917/gov.uscourts.txed.197917.10.0.pdf

The FBI sat on Seth Rich’s laptop for 4 1/2 years and now they want 3 more months.

Barr retirement is a good thing.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Arizona election update Nov 14, 2020, 19.5k less senate than president votes, 42k just Biden?, Dominion mish mash, Sidney Powell to release the Kraken 

Arizona election update Nov 14, 2020, 19.5k less senate than president votes, 42k just Biden?, Dominion mish mash, Sidney Powell to release the Kraken

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Mantra of the left: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

 

First consider the following:

President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by .32%.

Attorney Sidney Powell on November 8, 2020 stated there were 42k ballots in Arizona  with only Biden selected.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs tweeted the following on August 15, 2017:

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”

NOW THE FOLLOWING.

Not only is Arizona using Dominion election hardware and software, they have a mish mash that would be troubling under the most honest and professional circumstances.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/12/arizona-voting-machines-tabulators-analysis-and-controversies-hardware-software-procedures-security-trump-lawsuit-exposes-and-questions-procedures/

From Citizen Wells November 13, 2020.

“Arizona’s mandated “hand count audit” is practically worthless.

It selects 2% of ballots by county from the “universe” of ballots that it received and kept and all that it effectively proves is that the tabulators function the same way as during the initial count.”

“An examination of the Maricopa County ‘audit” raises a least one red flag.

The difference between the presidential and senate votes.

President votes:  2,894

Senator votes:   2,678

A difference of 216.

Taking this 2% to 100% of the county the total difference for the county is

10,800.

That is the approximate current Biden lead.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/13/arizona-mandated-hand-count-audit-raises-more-questions-than-answers-maricopa-county-10-8k-less-senate-votes-sidney-powell-42k-ballots-only-biden/

From the count this morning, there are actually 19,522 more presidential than senate votes in Maricopa County alone.

Are these some of the Biden only ballots Sidney Powell referred to?

Attorney Sidney Powell on the Lou Dobbs last night said:

“I’m going to RELEASE THE KRAKEN”

From RT.com November 14, 2020.

“‘I’m going to RELEASE THE KRAKEN’: Michael Flynn’s attorney vows to expose Dem collusion behind prominent voting machine firm
Republican attorney Sidney Powell has vowed to “expose every one of” the officials who helped allegedly steal the 2020 election for Democrat Joe Biden, claiming voting machine maker Dominion Voting Systems facilitated the theft.

Powell, who is representing former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in his Russiagate-spawned legal battle, leveled her own allegations of foreign collusion and election meddling on Fox News’ Lou Dobbs Tonight show on Friday. Threatening those responsible with a “new American revolution,” she called for a sweeping probe into what she described as a longstanding pattern of election interference.

Claiming Dominion Voting Systems, one of the largest makers of voting machines for the US, “was created to produce altered voting results in Venezuela for [socialist leader] Hugo Chavez,” Powell argued that the system – which she said was funded by Cuba and China as well as Caracas – is little more than an election-fixing operation.

Dominion has “been used all over the world to defy the will of people who wanted freedom,” she declared.

President Trump won this election in a landslide. It’s going to be irrefutable.

“Patriots are coming forward all day every day” with “statistical evidence that shows just hundreds of thousands of votes being put in and replicated” to swing the vote to Biden, Powell said, suggesting Big Tech and the media establishment had finished the job by covering up for Dominion and its political cronies.”

Read more:

https://www.rt.com/usa/506698-powell-kraken-dominion-election-fraud/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Hunter Biden laptop timeline incriminates FBI casts doubt on Attorney General Barr integrity, FBI withheld data from impeachment and lied to Senator Johnson committee

Hunter Biden laptop timeline incriminates FBI casts doubt on Attorney General Barr integrity, FBI withheld data from impeachment and lied to Senator Johnson committee

“I have heard Joe Biden say he has never discussed his dealings with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden,”…Tony Bobulinski 

“I’m making this statement to set the record straight about the involvement of the Biden family, Vice President Biden, his brother Jim Biden, and his son Hunter Biden in dealings with the Chinese.”,,,Tony Bobulinski

“It is clear the Chinese want Joe Biden to win. They have plenty of blackmail material to continue influencing (controlling) him.”…Citizen Wells

 

The attorney for John Paul Mac Isaac, the Delaware computer repairman who turned in Hunter Biden’s laptop and hard drive to the FBI, has provided a detailed timeline of events.

From Attorney Brian Della Rocca.

“Statement of Attorney Brian Della Rocca:

I represent John Paul Mac Isaac, the Mac repair shop owner in Wilmington, Delaware who unwittingly became the target of a smear campaign by doing what he thought was right. John Paul is not a right-wing fanatic nor is he a Russian hacker.

By way of background, John Paul has owned his shop for over ten years now. Prior to that, John Paul was the “Lead Genius” at the Apple Store in Littleton, Colorado and New Castle, Delaware. Once, while employed by Apple, he found himself in a situation where, while fixing a customer’s iMac, he came across seemingly illegal material. He followed protocol and contacted the authorities. No one questioned John Paul’s ethics then.

Fast-forward to April 12, 2019 when a man claiming to be Hunter Biden walked into his shop. While John Paul was pleased that someone of Hunter Biden’s notoriety was in his shop, he didnot question why Hunter Biden was there. In fact, Hunter Biden had been referred to John Paul’s shop. John Paul is well respected in the community and it would not have been uncommon for his patrons to refer others to his shop. John Paul provided a solution for one of Hunter Biden’s three laptops on the spot. Another laptop was a complete write-off but the third laptop required more significant intervention. That laptop remained in the shop with John Paul. Hunter Biden returned two days later with an external hard drive to which John Paul would transfer the information.

According to John Paul, recovering the data was difficult because of the significant liquid damage to the drive. He would boot the computer and transfer as much as he could before the computer shut down. Then, he would boot up the computer again, verify what was copied, and then transfer more data until the computer shut down again. This process repeated several times. During this process, John Paul saw certain pieces of information but, at the time, he did
not think anything of it. Instead, John Paul completed the work and contacted Hunter Biden to let him know. Hunter Biden never responded. As requested by Hunter Biden, a secure payment request was sent in an email but was never paid. John Paul contacted him at least one more time but Hunter Biden never responded. The policy of the shop is that items not picked up within 90
days of the completion of the services will be treated as abandoned property.

Around mid-July of 2019, news of Hunter Biden’s business dealings with the Ukraine were coming more into focus and John Paul started to get uncomfortable with the information he had seen. He was unsure if the hard drive contained information pertinent to the legal investigation. At that point, he reached out to his father, a retired Colonel in the U.S. Air Force, for advice
about what he should do. They both decided that going to the FBI and handing over the Mac and the drive was their best course of action. Soon thereafter, John Paul’s father took a copy of the hard drive to an FBI field office in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The FBI turned John Paul’s father away.

Then, in mid-October of 2019, an FBI Agent reached out to Colonel Mac Isaac and wanted to discuss the Mac and drive. At that point, Colonel Mac Isaac passed along John Paul’s contact information. The FBI then reached out to John Paul and met him at his house to discuss John Paul’s concerns. On December 9, 2019, the FBI served a Subpoena on John Paul for the computer, the hard drive, and all related paperwork. He willingly gave it to the FBI and was happy to see it go.

Out of an abundance of caution, John Paul made a copy of the drive in case he was ever thrown under the bus as a result of what he knew. As John Paul watched the impeachment trial, he wondered why there was no reference to the information he had provided to the FBI. As a result, starting in February of 2020 and until July of 2020, John Paul reached out to several members of Congress to notify them of what he had in his possession. His requests fell on deaf ears.

Out of frustration, in the beginning of September, John Paul reached out to someone he thought would be able to provide the information directly to the President. That person was Rudy Giuliani. A day after John Paul reached out to Giuliani’s office, Robert Costello, Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, contacted John Paul to discuss the information and John Paul’s concerns.

On September 24, 2020, John Paul then submitted information about the drive to Senator Ron Johnson through the whistleblower link on Senator Johnson’s website. After that submission and while Giuliani’s office was still trying to verify the information, Senator Johnson released the senate report on the Biden business dealings. As we all know, prior to the New York Post’s exposé, rumors began to circulate about the existence of Hunter Biden’s laptop. Those rumors
did not start with John Paul. We believe, due to the timing of the rumors, that the information may have been leaked by Senator Johnson’s office. Then, when Rudy Giuliani released the information to the New York Post, that is when John Paul’s life as a respected part of the Wilmington, Delaware community changed.”

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-10/DellaRoccaStatementtoJTN.pdf

Condensed timeline with relevance:

  1. The Albuquerque FBI rejected Hunter Biden’s laptop in July 2019. The son of former VP Biden, with political aspirations who was already associated with shady activities. The offer was made by a retired colonel. Incompetence or more anti Trump bias from the FBI?
  2. ” mid-October of 2019, an FBI Agent reached out to Colonel Mac Isaac” John Paul’s contact information provided.
  3. December 9, 2019 FBI subpoena gave them possession of the computer and hard drive.
  4. February – July 2020 John Paul reached out to several members of Congress and was ignored.
  5. Early September 2020 John Paul reached out to Rudy Giuliani and his attorney Robert Costello.
  6. ” September 24, 2020, John Paul then submitted information about the drive to Senator Ron Johnson through the whistleblower link”
  7. On September 24, 2020 Senators Johnson and Grassley released the following report: “ Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and RelatedConcerns”

It is abundantly clear from the timeline above that the FBI had every opportunity to provide information that likely would have stopped the President Trump Impeachment in its tracks.

Furthermore,

The FBI apparently lied to Senate Committees in March 2020.

Senator Ron Johnson of the Homeland Security Committee sent a letter to FBI Director Wray on October 17, 2020.

He requested information about the Hunter Biden laptop.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/18/hunter-biden-computer-update-october-17-2020-ron-johnson-letter-to-wray-whistleblower-contacted-does-the-fbi-possess-material-from-hunter-bidens-laptops/

From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:

After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:

“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”

So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/25/fbi-hunter-biden-laptop-smoking-gun-from-march-2020-staff-briefing-to-senate-committees-did-not-have-any-additional-information-to-provide/

The corrupt FBI is clearly guilty of withholding information from the government and American People.

Attorney General Barr bears some responsibility.

Was he aware of the Hunter Biden laptop?

Consider this March 4, 2020 statement by Senator Johnson:

“And if I were a Democrat primary voter, I’d want these questions satisfactorily answered before I cast my final vote.”

How prophetic!

“Change my vote.”

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/