Category Archives: Attorneys

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

You could not ask for better witnesses and evidence for election fraud lawsuits.

The following were selected for their backgrounds, expertise and the fact that they personally observed probable fraud and certain irregularities.

Michigan.

Only one is listed because this witness was an Assistant Attorney General for Michigan for 8 years!

Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

“87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Georgia.

Harri Hursti:

Poll Observer. “My background and qualifications in voting system cybersecurity are set forth in my December 16, 2019 declaration. ”    “I am also an expert in ballot scanning because of extensive background in digital imaging prior by work researching election systems.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.4.pdf

Susan Voyles:

Poll Manager.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.16.pdf

Mayra Romera:

Florida Bar licensed paralegal.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf

Nicholas J. Zeher:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.15.pdf

 Ibrahim Reyes:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.17.pdf

Carlos E. Silva:

Florida trial lawyer for over 26 years.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.19.pdf

Kevin P. Peterford:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.22.pdf

It’s almost like they expected widespread fraud.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Pennsylvania House Resolution Nov 27 “Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute”, Co- sponsorship memorandum

Pennsylvania House Resolution Nov 27 “Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute”, Co- sponsorship memorandum

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the Pennsylvania House of Representatives November 27, 2020.

“A RESOLUTION

Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute.

WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and

WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and

WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and

WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and

WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.”

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=H&SPick=20190&cosponId=32628&mobile_choice=suppress

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the

Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough

Filed November 27, 2020

Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.

Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.

As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.

Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.

The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/486132522/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-in-Pennsylvania-by-Judge-McCullough-Election-Likely-Unconstitutional#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

The duty of Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel and indeed that of any state AG is to uphold the law.

Apparently Nessel, infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, is unable to do her duty and instead threatens whistleblowers who are doing her job of exposing election fraud and corruption.

From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.

“Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘””

“Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/27/michigan-ag-dana-nessel-complicit-in-election-fraud-and-coverup-sidney-powell-lawsuit-numerous-witnesses-confirm-threatened-journalist-detroitleaks-video-authentic/

From The Hill.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) warned on Monday that a false claim of criminal activity, including election fraud, is itself a crime.

Through a tweet, Nessel responded to former state Sen. Patrick Colbeck’s (R) comments during a Michigan Board of State Canvassers meeting that ended with the state’s election results being certified.

Colbeck faced questions during the meeting about whether he had brought his allegations of voter fraud to the state attorney general.

Nessel confirmed in her Twitter thread that Colbeck “has never made a complaint of election fraud” to the Michigan attorney general’s office.

“If he had, we would have fully investigated said claim,” she said. ”

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/527265-michigan-ag-warns-on-election-fraud-claims-a-false-claim-of-criminal

Why would anyone take Nessel at her word?

Nessel is an avid anti-Trumper, routinely offering deranged comparisons of the President to Nazis and Adolf Hitler:

Jordyn Hermani
@JordynHermani

AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.”

https://summit.news/2020/11/13/michigan-ag-trumps-voter-fraud-lawsuits-are-racist/

From constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley November 23, 2020.

“Democratic leaders like Michigan’s Attorney General  Dana Nessel have threatened criminal prosecution against those who have posted videos alleging voting fraud and even threatened possible prosecution of legislators who meet with President Trump or raise challenges to the election results.  The media is virtually silent on these threats to coerce lawyers and legislators into silence. That is not viewed as a threat to the rule of law.  The threats against lawyers follows a pattern where Democratic members are calling for blacklists and others denounce any questioning of the Biden victory as akin to “Holocaust denial.” I spoke last week to Republican lawyers who described death threats, doxxing, and continual harassment for their representation in these lawsuits. The message is that if you represent the wrong side you will be denounced, doxxed, and disbarred.”

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/11/23/democratic-member-files-bar-actions-against-two-dozen-lawyers-challenging-election-results/

Clearly Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel  must be removed from office and prosecuted.

She is part of the problem and not solution.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Michigan election statutes:

168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.

(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.

168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.

remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,

It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”

Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”

Read more:

https://www.oann.com/mich-ag-nessel-threatens-journalist-over-detroit-leaks/

Big League Poliitics had been covering election fraud in Detroit and Michigan.

“Big League Politics has been reporting about imminent electoral concerns in the city of Detroit for weeks now, starting with our #DetroitLeaks series and then continuing by reporting from the absentee ballot counting board at the TCF Center in Detroit on election night.”

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/republican-poll-challengers-speak-out-on-what-they-saw-at-detroits-absentee-voter-counting-board/

The #DetroitLeaks series has apparently been scrubbed.

Was this because of the threat from AG Nessel?

This video is still up on Youtube.

Is the video authentic?

Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

Compare the following to revelations in the video:

“13. There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in
collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll watchers and activists.First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:

A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all
Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;
B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view
ballot handling, processing, or counting and locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots we reprocessed;
C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;
D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored
Democratic poll watchers;
E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined
herein;                                                                                                                                    F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without
allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;
G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote;
H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered
Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and
I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit
employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory
behavior.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

The complaint is loaded with fraud allegations from numerous credible witnesses.

You are urged to read it.

Real ballots should be counted and invalid ones thrown out.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel should be thrown out too and prosecuted.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

Pennsylvania.

From the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee.

Public Hearing on Election Issues

November 25, 2020.

Rudy Giuliani: “You sent out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1,823,148 absentee or mail-in ballots. You received back 1.4 million approximately. However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million. I don’t know what accounts for the 700,000 difference between the ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count,”

Are the excess ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

Georgia.

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An
Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:

14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.

15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.

16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”

“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”

Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit.

John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al

Filed November 25, 2020.

“The Contestant John Wood, as an aggrieved elector, brings this lawsuit against
the Defendants because state and local election administration officials have ignored statutes, interposed their own solutions for ballot security, accepted private money that casts doubt on election integrity and so mismanaged
the election process that no one can have faith that one of their most sacred rights under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, voting,
is being protected. Within the State of Georgia, private non—
profits, state officials and local elected officials acted to systematically eviscerate Georgia’s Election Law contrary to Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia—failing to protect election integrity. Investigations have uncovered more than $350 million distributed nationwide —$6.3 million of which went to Fulton County, Georgia—and funneled through collection of non—profit organizations dictating to election officials how to manage the election.

In particular, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) granted $6.3 million USD to Fulton County, Georgia. These unregulated private funds were predominantly used to:

(1) pay “ballot harvesters”;
(2) provide mobile ballot pick up units;
(3) deputize and pay political activists to manage ballots;
(4) pay election judges and poll workers;
(5) establish drop—boxes and satellite offices;
(6) pay local election officials and agents to recruit cities recognized as democratic strongholds to recruit other cities to apply for grants
from non—profits;
(7) consolidate counting centers in the urban core to facilitate the movement of hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots in secrecy without
legally required bi-partisan observation;
(8) initiate and implement two—tier ballot “curing” plan that illegally
counted ballots in Democrat strongholds and spoil similarly
situated ballots in Republican strongholds; and
(9) pay for and help design the plan to remove the poll watchers from one political party so that the critical responsibility of determining
the validity of the ballot and the validity of the count could be conducted without oversight.”

Read more:

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020CV342959-PETITION.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” “

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” ”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit.

1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the 2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the affidavits of expert witnesses.

2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.

3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.

Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation

4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger rushed through the purchase of
Dominion voting machines and software in 2019 for the 2020 Presidential
Election4. A certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated. (See attached hereto Exh. 5, copy
Certification for Dominion Voting Systems from Secretary of State).
Similarly a test report is signed by Michael Walker as Project Manager but is
also undated. (See Exh. 6, Test Report for Dominion Voting Systems,
Democracy Suite 5-4-A)

Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger disregarded all the concerns that
caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of Elections in
2018, namely that it was vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable
manipulation. An industry expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of
Computer Science and Election Security Expert has recently observed, with
reference to Dominion Voting machines: “I figured out how to make a slightly
different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches
some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer
program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you just need
7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver.” (Attached hereto Exh. 7, Study,
Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters by
Andrew W. Appel Princeton University, Richard A. DeMillo, Georgia Tech
Philip B. Stark, for the Univ. of California, Berkeley, December 27, 2019).5

As explained and demonstrated in the accompanying redacted
declaration of a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military
Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic
intelligence, the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf
of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the
most recent US general election in 2020. This Declaration further includes a
copy of the patent records for Dominion Systems in which Eric Coomer is
listed as the first of the inventors of Dominion Voting Systems. (See
Attached hereto as Exh. 8, copy of redacted witness affidavit, 17 pages,
November 23, 2020).

Expert Navid Keshavarez-Nia explains that US intelligence services
had developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion.
He states that Dominion’s software is vulnerable to data manipulation by
unauthorized means and permitted election data to be altered in all
battleground states. He concludes that hundreds of thousands of votes that
were cast for President Trump in the 2020 general election were transferred
to former Vice-President Biden. (Exh. 26).

Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records
demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and
counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards
by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See
Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.).

The Dominion system used in Georgia erodes and undermines the
reconciliation of the number of voters and the number of ballots cast, such
that these figures are permitted to be unreconciled, opening the door to ballot
stuffing and fraud. The collapse of reconciliation was seen in Georgia’s
primary and runoff elections this year, and in the November election, where
it was discovered during the hand audit that 3,300 votes were found on
memory sticks that were not uploaded on election night, plus in Floyd county,
another 2,600 absentee ballots had not been scanned. These “found votes”
reduced Biden’s lead over Donald Trump6.”

“Georgia’s election officials and poll workers exacerbated and helped,
whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Dominion system carry out massive
voter manipulation by refusing to observe statutory safeguards for absentee
ballots. Election officials failed to verify signatures and check security
envelopes. They barred challengers from observing the count, which also
facilitated the fraud.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Sidney Powell on Georgia lawsuits: “biblical” voter fraud case, “We’ve got tons of evidence”, “You name the manner of fraud and it occurred in Georgia.”

Sidney Powell on Georgia lawsuits: “biblical” voter fraud case, “We’ve got tons of evidence”, “You name the manner of fraud and it occurred in Georgia.”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The voter participation rate in DeKalb was 67.8% a major red flag.”…Citizen Wells

 

From NewsMax November 21, 2020.

“Sidney Powell: ‘Biblical’ Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion

Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a “biblical” voter fraud case this week.

“We’ve got tons of evidence; it’s so much, it’s hard to pull it all together,” Powell told Saturday night’s “The Count” co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.

“You name the manner of fraud and it occurred in Georgia.”

Among the most explosive claims alluded to by Powell were:

  • Joe Biden votes being “weighted” at 1.25 times and President Donald Trump votes being parsed at 3/4.
  • Algorithms that gave Democrats 35,000 extra votes.
  • Modifications made to voting machines after statuatory cutoff dates for changes.
  • Past election victories, including Hillary Clinton’s primary victory over Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., being forced decided by Dominion Voting Systems.
  • Alleged pay-for-play kick backs to public officials, potentially even Georgia GOP Gov. Kemp for a late grant to use Dominion Voting Systems.

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/sidney-powell-campaign-lawyer-dominion/2020/11/21/id/998181/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/