Category Archives: Attorneys

Attorney Lin Wood on the Cabal child sex trafficking and pedophilia and fraudulent election, March 7, 2021, SCOTUS In re L. Lin Wood, Jr. response Mon

Attorney Lin Wood on the Cabal child sex trafficking and pedophilia and fraudulent election, March 7, 2021, SCOTUS In re L. Lin Wood, Jr. response Mon

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

From Attorney Lin Wood March 7, 2021

(3) After the Deep State, who must also be identified and prosecuted to avoid another attempt to overthrow our government? Brace yourselves for the answer. The Cabal. Yes, I said it. The Cabal of the super rich and powerful. The globalists. The individuals and entities who own the world’s financial systems and control major companies that make up the world economy. May even include individuals in the House of Windsor and the Vatican. Rothschild’s? Rockefeller’s? Who knows? We need to know who these people are and then take the time to prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. I am willing to wait, are you? I want to see them ALL brought to justice. Don’t you?

(4) Now the ugliest part of the truth that must be faced and addressed. It relates to the Cabal and its desire to make even more money, satisfy its members perverted sexual desires, and execute their worship of Satan who gave them fortunes and power in exchange for sacrifices of young children

Child sex trafficking and pedophilia.

We must take the time necessary to locate and save these children. They are enslaved all over the world. They number in the millions. Many have suffered for years and will face lifetimes filled with pain and despair.

Wisdom counsels me to be patient. Justice is coming. Good will triumph over evil. In the battle between powers and principalities, remember God has already won. God is on our side.

We are talking about more than an election. We are talking about more than political parties.

We are talking about our humanity.

I pray that I am correct in my analysis of the perceived delay in “action” in reversing the fraudulent election.

I pray I am correct for the children’s sake.

Thanks for listening.”

Read more:

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

Apparently we will get the SCOTUS decision tomorrow, Monday, March 8, 2021.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

 

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

Lin Wood whistleblower absolutely credible per Lt. General Tom McInerney, Attorney Wood Telegram comments: “I found the whistleblower interview …credible”

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

From Attorney Lin Wood on Telegram

“As I have earlier made clear, I found the whistleblower interview regarding Chief Justice Roberts, former Vice President Pence and other high ranking officials to be credible.

Given the seriousness of his statements, I made the transcript public and also provided the thumb drive to the United States Secret Service, the State Bar of Georgia, the Lawyers Club of Atlanta President and members of its Executive Committee, Mercer Law School, Mercer Law School Dean Cathy Cox, and the District Court of Colorado Bar.

Are the allegations of the whistleblower being investigated?

With the exception of the Secret Service, all of the other recipients of the whistleblower interview have to my knowledge done nothing except to falsely smear me.

I was just the messenger. I only did what I felt was my duty as a law-abiding citizen, lawyer, and officer of the court. And for that, members of the legal profession seek to destroy me.

I think you understand exactly what is going on here. I do.”

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney explains why Lin Wood’s whistleblower is absolutely credible

FROM A LIN WOOD WHISTLEBLOWER TESTIMONY TRANSCRIBED MARCH 1, 2021.

· “I started providing this in 2005, and in 2008 I
13· started working directly with Rod Rosenstein in Baltimore,
14· and because of the access with the other agencies, the FBI,
15· for instance, would come for corroboration of something they
16· were working on, or just to ask questions, if I’d seen
17· something like this, if this related to anything.· Then it
18· grew from there.
19· · · · · · Because of the undercover nature of many of the
20· investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism
21· within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and
22· access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod
23· Rosenstein.”

· “INTERVIEWEE:· · · · That group, I mean, they’re all
13· interconnected one way or another.· That particular group was
14· Rod, VP Pence, Paul Ryan.· That was the core of that group.
15· Rod was in there, but that was the core of it.· It was an
16· attempt, where Rod was the brilliant legal mind behind it, to
17· remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment.”

“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts — a lot
24· of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as
25· favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people.
·2· · · · · · We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief
·3· Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but
·4· it was also — Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type
·5· to various agencies around the world.· They used his
·6· information.· They exploited it for their own good.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/05/lin-wood-whistleblower-transcripts-transcribed-mar-1-2021-re-justice-roberts-mike-pence-rod-rosenstein-et-al-ref-in-feb-9-us-district-court-affidavit/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Lin Wood whistleblower transcripts transcribed Mar 1 2021 re Justice Roberts Mike Pence Rod Rosenstein et al, Ref in Feb 9 US District Court affidavit 

Lin Wood whistleblower transcripts transcribed Mar 1 2021 re Justice Roberts Mike Pence Rod Rosenstein et al, Ref in Feb 9 US District Court affidavit

“Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.”…Dept. of Philosophy, Texas State

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

From Attorney Lin Wood in a US District Court Affidavit filed Feb 9, 2021.

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”

“I exercised my right of free speech and did urge attendees to consider engaging in acts of non-violent freedom of assembly and the right to publicly protest acts and inactions by the Georgia Governor and Secretary of State. I am in
possession of credible evidence supporting criminal acts by these Georgia officials.”

“I am in possession of credible evidence to support my statements about Pence and Rod Rosenstein, as well as information about the death of Seth Rich.”

“I have credible evidence to support the truth of my description of Former Vice President Pence as a traitor.”

“I have turned over whistleblower evidence to the United States Secret Service related to Former Vice-President Mike Pence and other high-ranking government officials. If desired by this Court, I am prepared to file that evidence along with a considerable amount of evidence of election fraud. I am not doing so at this time as I do not believe those issues are relevant to the
present motion which I believe is nothing more than an effort to smear my reputation and interfere with Plaintiff’s Constitutional right to counsel of her choice.”

“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/13/lin-wood-responds-to-ad-hominem-attacks-in-legal-docs-liberte-v-reid-jan-feb-2021-wood-credible-evidence-ga-officials-pence-rosenstein-roberts-no-retraction-demands/

From a Lin Wood whistleblower testimony transcribed March 1, 2021.

INTERVIEWER:· · · · This is an interview with Ryan
·2· Dark White.· This is an interview for Attorney Lin Wood.
·3· This is Saturday, January 9th, 2021.
·4· · · · · · And, Ryan, if you could just give us a brief
·5· background — excuse us — brief background about yourself —
·6· where you grew up, where you went to school — just so we
·7· know a little bit more about you.
·8· · · · · · INTERVIEWEE:· · · · Ryan D. White.· It’s not my
·9· birth name.· It’s not the name I prefer.· Originally from
10· Maryland.· I hold graduate degrees — I held graduate degrees
11· — I’ll explain that — in physics, mathematics, biology and
12· chemistry from the University of Pennsylvania and Green
13· College, Oxford.
14· · · · · · Graduate school would be University of
15· Pennsylvania, Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland,
16· University of Maryland’s physics program.
17· · · · · · Throughout this control that Rod has put on, he has
18· actually personally sent letters — or his assistant, but he
19· signed them.· I went to school very young — it throws people
20· off — and he used that against me.
21· · · · · · He would send letters to my schools, my undergrad
22· and grad, he’d send letters to the military saying that, you
23· know, “This person Ryan White is using John McGreavy’s
24· information.· John McGreavy’s deceased, so best if you just
25· destroy it.”

He got much of it destroyed.· There are still
·2· pieces there that can easily be verified and checked and
·3· rebuilt, hopefully, but he did his best to destroy it.· He
·4· did the same thing with the military, the U.S. Army, Army
·5· from ’85 to ’96 and Guard for — Maryland Guard for three
·6· years after that — three and a half years after that.
·7· · · · · · Rod apparently didn’t know that the Guard was
·8· separate, so they have a lot of the records.· He didn’t get
·9· to them.· But, like I said, it’s easy enough to check and
10· find the pieces, and hopefully somebody can help me put them
11· back together.”

· “I started providing this in 2005, and in 2008 I
13· started working directly with Rod Rosenstein in Baltimore,
14· and because of the access with the other agencies, the FBI,
15· for instance, would come for corroboration of something they
16· were working on, or just to ask questions, if I’d seen
17· something like this, if this related to anything.· Then it
18· grew from there.
19· · · · · · Because of the undercover nature of many of the
20· investigations I worked on, terrorists or domestic terrorism
21· within the country, they kept me fairly well concealed, and
22· access was limited to a certain group headed by Rod
23· Rosenstein.”

· “INTERVIEWEE:· · · · That group, I mean, they’re all
13· interconnected one way or another.· That particular group was
14· Rod, VP Pence, Paul Ryan.· That was the core of that group.
15· Rod was in there, but that was the core of it.· It was an
16· attempt, where Rod was the brilliant legal mind behind it, to
17· remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment.”

“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts — a lot
24· of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as
25· favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people.
·2· · · · · · We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief
·3· Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but
·4· it was also — Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type
·5· to various agencies around the world.· They used his
·6· information.· They exploited it for their own good.”

Read more:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fk1qlm0ja2syywm/FULL%20Transcript%20of%20Whistleblower%20Interview.pdf?dl=0

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures. In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.  Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.”…Citizen Wells

 

Oral arguments were presented today before the US Supreme Court, March 2, 2021 in

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

Listen here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2020/19-1257

Read Transcript:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2020/19-1257_d1o2.pdf

More on the case here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/03/02/arizona-ag-brnovich-scotus-case-importance-in-oral-hearing-today-tue-march-2-2021-ga-folded-to-abrams-dnc-demands-and-az-fighting-to-maintain-election-laws/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

This should be an open and closed case.

The procedures being questioned follow those of most states.

By the Constitution, the states have control over election procedures.

High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures.

In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.

Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.

Hence today’s hearing.

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in Texas v PA GA MI WI, Dec 9, 2020.

“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in the AZ Senate Maricopa County case Dec 30, 2020.

“The Arizona Legislature has broad authority to investigate the County’s
administration of the 2020 general election to determine whether Arizona law regarding election administration should remain the same or be changed. In resolving this matter, the Court should (1) recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad authority to issue legislative subpoenas, (2) exercise deferential review of the subpoenas at issue, (3) hold that the presiding officer of either house or the chairman of any committee have the authority to issue subpoenas reviewing the County’s administration of elections, and (4) reject any effort by the County to interpose separation of powers concerns.”

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Maricopa%20County%20v%20Fann_%20AGO%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

From the Brnovich Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

Why did the Supreme Court take this case?

It goes to the core of the constitution and states rights to administer elections.

Secondly, AG Brnovich is on defense, not offense.

 

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

From Prescotte Enews March 1, 2021

“The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will review a case challenging Arizona’s election integrity laws concerning ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting.

In 2016, Arizona passed HB 2023 to restrict ballot harvesting in Arizona unless the person collecting the ballot is a family member, a person living in the same household, or a caregiver. Since the 1970s, Arizona has required people to vote at their specific precinct.

General Brnovich intervened on behalf of Arizona after the Secretary of State refused to defend the measures.

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is asking SCOTUS to bring clarity to these matters after a misguided ruling by the Ninth Circuit struck the measures down.”

Read more:

https://prescottenews.com/index.php/2021/03/01/ballot-harvesting-brnovich-v-dnc/

Us Supreme Court

TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021
CASES FOR ARGUMENT TODAY

Tuesday, March 2
(2)
BRNOVICH V. DNC
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
V. DNC
(Consolidated – 1 hr. for argument)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalFebruary2021.pdf

No. 19-1257
Vide 19-1258

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

FROM THE SCOTUS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

Dec 30 2020     Petition for a writ of mandamus

“The Georgia Legislature has plenary authority to set the “Times, Places
and Manner” of Federal Elections and has clearly set forth the procedures to be
followed in verifying the identity of in-person voters as well as mail-in absentee ballot voters. The Georgia Secretary of State usurped that power by entering into a Settlement Agreement with the Democratic Party earlier this year and issuing an “Official Election Bulletin” that modified the Legislature’s clear procedures for verifying the identity of mail-in voters. The effect of the Secretary of State’s
unauthorized procedure is to treat the class of voters who vote by mail different from the class of voters who vote in-person, like Petitioner. That procedure dilutes the votes of in-person voters by votes from persons whose identities are less likely to verified as required by the legislative scheme. The Secretary’s unconstitutional modifications to the legislative scheme violated Petitioner’s Equal Protection rights by infringing on his fundamental right to vote. The Eleventh Circuit has held that Petitioner does not have standing to chall enge State action that dilutes his vote and infringes upon his constitutional right to Equal Protection. The questions presented are:”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-887/165104/20201230211038462_Emergency%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Mandamus.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

“¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.”…Wisconsin Supreme Court

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

From the SCOTUS, United States Supreme Court

No. 20-883

Donald J. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-883

Dec 30 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed.

“After Election Day, Respondents encouraged the
counting of, and did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots received in violation of the “mandatory” requirement of Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2) that absentee ballots “in contravention of the [specified statutory absentee balloting] procedures…may not be counted.”
The foregoing raises the following questions:
1. Whether WEC and local election officials violated Art. II, § 1, cl. 2 of the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of
Equal Protection during the 2020 Presidential election by implementing unauthorized absentee voting practices in disregard of the Wisconsin Legislature’s explicit command that absentee voting must be “carefully regulated” and absentee ballots cast outside of the Legislature’s authorized procedures “may not be counted”?

2. Whether this Court should declare the Wisconsin election unconstitutional and void under Article II and thus failed under 3 U.S.C. § 2 and allow the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint its electors?

3. Whether federal courts may rely on the doctrine of laches to avoid reviewing Electors Clause or Equal Protection claims arising after absentee balloting began or which could not have reasonably been brought before absentee balloting commenced?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-883/165018/20201230144119028_20-___PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

From the Wisconsin Legislature January 4, 2021.

January 4, 2021 – Introduced by Representative Allen.

    ***AUTHORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE***

Relating to: addressing election law violations.
Whereas, in the United States, the power to govern is given by the people
through the process of democratic elections. It is by this process that our government obtains legitimacy; and
Whereas, we have three branches of government, and the legislative branch,
consisting of duly elected representatives of the people, is the branch charged with the power to write the laws. It is through this process that our government maintains legitimacy; and
Whereas, when the executive branch or administrative agencies charged with
enforcing the laws instead choose to step outside of the law, or go beyond the law, or stretch the law to something other than what is written, the legitimacy of the government begins to erode; and
Whereas, the 2020 election and the recount of the results of the presidential
election have brought to light a number of areas in which the letter of the law is not being followed. Those circumstances of departure from the letter of the law include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Clerks provided absentee ballots to electors without applications, as
required by Wis. Stat. § 6.86.
2. Clerks and deputy clerks authorized by the municipal clerk failed to write
on the official ballot, in the space for official endorsement, the clerk’s initials and
official title, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
3. Clerks issued absentee ballots to electors who were required to enclose a copy
of proof of identification or an authorized substitute document, but who failed to do so under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
4. Clerks failed to enter initials on ballot envelopes indicating whether the
elector is exempt from providing proof of identification, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2).
5. Clerks in Milwaukee and Dane Counties declared electors in their counties
to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86 (2), causing chaos and confusion, and failed to keep current the mailing list established under that subsection; more than 215,000 electors thus avoided identification requirements and safeguards that the legislature has established.
6. Clerks and the boards of canvassers permitted absentee ballots returned
without the required witness address under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2) to be counted in
contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6d).
7. Clerks who received absentee ballots with improperly completed certificates
or no certificates filled in missing information in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (9).

8. The Wisconsin Elections Commission, in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.875,
barred special voting deputies from entering qualified nursing homes and assisted living facilities, instead mailing ballots to residents directly, thereby avoiding safeguards the legislature put in place to protect our most vulnerable citizens and loved ones.
9. The clerk of the City of Madison ignored Wis. Stat. § 6.855 and created an
event named “Democracy in the Park” and, of her own accord, designated alternate sites where absentee ballots could be collected; these ballots were counted in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6); and
Whereas, without legitimacy, the government of the people, by the people, and
for the people shall not stand. Instead, our government will devolve into a system of coercion and bribery that seeks to use the guise of elections to hold a degree of credibility; and
Whereas, the people of Wisconsin are demanding that the legislature address
questions of legitimacy; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the assembly, That: the Wisconsin State Assembly recognizes
that the most important function for a government is to conduct fair and honest
elections that follow the duly enacted law; and, be it further
Resolved, That when there are significant portions of the population that
question the integrity of the elections due to the failure of election officials to follow the letter of the law, it is incumbent upon the legislature to address the issues that are in question; and, be it further
Resolved, That the members of the Wisconsin State Assembly place the
redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures as its highest priority and shall take up legislation crafted to ensure civil officers follow the laws as written.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/05/wisconsin-legislature-2021-assembly-resolution-3-introduced-january-4-2021-redress-to-these-and-other-election-law-violations-and-failed-administrative-procedures/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Sidney Powell: “There is enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

Sidney Powell: “enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

Massive Election Fraud

From GateWay Pundit

“Sidney Powell LIVE: “There Is More than Enough Evidence in the Public Now to More than Reverse the Election in at Least 5 States” “

“Sidney Powell had this to say to open the conversation. “Well, Erskine from my perspective it looks like the complete breakdown of every institution of law enforcement and the rule of law that we have trusted in this country since its inception to protect the law and the citizens from abuses by the government.

As far as the last election Sidney Powell had this to say, “There’s all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well… Fractionalized votes. That’s exactly what we have here from a computer algorithm that we can prove in multiple counties and it could prove across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines. The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know. Federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months… In this case it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots. We already know that’s not going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, “Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.” Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine you’re going to get the same result.

Sidney then dropped this bomb, “There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/sidney-powell-live-enough-evidence-public-now-reverse-election-least-5-states-video/

 

Dump

Twitter

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona real audit of 2020 election to begin after months delay by crooked Maricopa officials?, Scanned ballots and full forensic audit of equipment and software

Arizona real audit of 2020 election to begin after months delay by crooked Maricopa officials?, Scanned ballots and full forensic audit of equipment and software

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

After months of delays by crooked Maricopa election officials, a real audit of scanned ballots and full forensic audit of ballot tabulation equipment, the software for that equipment and the election management system should begin immediately after a judge clarified already established law.

“The Court finds that that Subpoenas are legal and enforceable. There is no question that the Senators have the power to issue legislative subpoenas. The Subpoenas comply with the statutory requirements for legislative subpoenas. The Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections. The Arizona legislature clearly has the power to investigate and examine election reform matters. Accordingly, the Senators have the power to subpoena material as part
of an inquiry into election reform measures. As such, the Subpoenas have a proper legislative purpose.27 The Subpoenas also do not violate separation of powers principles. Production of the subpoenaed materials would not violate confidentiality laws.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/27/arizona-judge-thomason-ruling-senate-also-has-broad-constitutional-power-to-oversee-elections-will-az-lead-the-nation-in-election-results-clarity-and-reform/

Details of the forensic audit are provided in the following subpoenas provided in court documents.

Scanned ballot audit

https://citizenwells.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/maricopasubpoena15.pdf

Full Forensic audit

https://citizenwells.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/maricopasubpoena11.pdf

https://citizenwells.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/maricopasubpoena12.pdf

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=2032

 

Will Arizona lead the nation in election integrity?

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells