Category Archives: Courts

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the

Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough

Filed November 27, 2020

Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.

Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.

As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.

Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.

The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/486132522/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-in-Pennsylvania-by-Judge-McCullough-Election-Likely-Unconstitutional#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

The duty of Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel and indeed that of any state AG is to uphold the law.

Apparently Nessel, infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, is unable to do her duty and instead threatens whistleblowers who are doing her job of exposing election fraud and corruption.

From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.

“Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘””

“Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/27/michigan-ag-dana-nessel-complicit-in-election-fraud-and-coverup-sidney-powell-lawsuit-numerous-witnesses-confirm-threatened-journalist-detroitleaks-video-authentic/

From The Hill.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) warned on Monday that a false claim of criminal activity, including election fraud, is itself a crime.

Through a tweet, Nessel responded to former state Sen. Patrick Colbeck’s (R) comments during a Michigan Board of State Canvassers meeting that ended with the state’s election results being certified.

Colbeck faced questions during the meeting about whether he had brought his allegations of voter fraud to the state attorney general.

Nessel confirmed in her Twitter thread that Colbeck “has never made a complaint of election fraud” to the Michigan attorney general’s office.

“If he had, we would have fully investigated said claim,” she said. ”

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/527265-michigan-ag-warns-on-election-fraud-claims-a-false-claim-of-criminal

Why would anyone take Nessel at her word?

Nessel is an avid anti-Trumper, routinely offering deranged comparisons of the President to Nazis and Adolf Hitler:

Jordyn Hermani
@JordynHermani

AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.”

https://summit.news/2020/11/13/michigan-ag-trumps-voter-fraud-lawsuits-are-racist/

From constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley November 23, 2020.

“Democratic leaders like Michigan’s Attorney General  Dana Nessel have threatened criminal prosecution against those who have posted videos alleging voting fraud and even threatened possible prosecution of legislators who meet with President Trump or raise challenges to the election results.  The media is virtually silent on these threats to coerce lawyers and legislators into silence. That is not viewed as a threat to the rule of law.  The threats against lawyers follows a pattern where Democratic members are calling for blacklists and others denounce any questioning of the Biden victory as akin to “Holocaust denial.” I spoke last week to Republican lawyers who described death threats, doxxing, and continual harassment for their representation in these lawsuits. The message is that if you represent the wrong side you will be denounced, doxxed, and disbarred.”

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/11/23/democratic-member-files-bar-actions-against-two-dozen-lawyers-challenging-election-results/

Clearly Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel  must be removed from office and prosecuted.

She is part of the problem and not solution.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Michigan election statutes:

168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.

(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.

168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.

remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,

It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”

Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”

Read more:

https://www.oann.com/mich-ag-nessel-threatens-journalist-over-detroit-leaks/

Big League Poliitics had been covering election fraud in Detroit and Michigan.

“Big League Politics has been reporting about imminent electoral concerns in the city of Detroit for weeks now, starting with our #DetroitLeaks series and then continuing by reporting from the absentee ballot counting board at the TCF Center in Detroit on election night.”

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/republican-poll-challengers-speak-out-on-what-they-saw-at-detroits-absentee-voter-counting-board/

The #DetroitLeaks series has apparently been scrubbed.

Was this because of the threat from AG Nessel?

This video is still up on Youtube.

Is the video authentic?

Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

Compare the following to revelations in the video:

“13. There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in
collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll watchers and activists.First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:

A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all
Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;
B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view
ballot handling, processing, or counting and locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots we reprocessed;
C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;
D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored
Democratic poll watchers;
E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined
herein;                                                                                                                                    F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without
allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;
G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote;
H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered
Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and
I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit
employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory
behavior.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

The complaint is loaded with fraud allegations from numerous credible witnesses.

You are urged to read it.

Real ballots should be counted and invalid ones thrown out.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel should be thrown out too and prosecuted.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

Pennsylvania.

From the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee.

Public Hearing on Election Issues

November 25, 2020.

Rudy Giuliani: “You sent out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1,823,148 absentee or mail-in ballots. You received back 1.4 million approximately. However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million. I don’t know what accounts for the 700,000 difference between the ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count,”

Are the excess ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

Georgia.

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An
Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:

14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.

15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.

16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”

“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”

Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit.

John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al

Filed November 25, 2020.

“The Contestant John Wood, as an aggrieved elector, brings this lawsuit against
the Defendants because state and local election administration officials have ignored statutes, interposed their own solutions for ballot security, accepted private money that casts doubt on election integrity and so mismanaged
the election process that no one can have faith that one of their most sacred rights under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, voting,
is being protected. Within the State of Georgia, private non—
profits, state officials and local elected officials acted to systematically eviscerate Georgia’s Election Law contrary to Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia—failing to protect election integrity. Investigations have uncovered more than $350 million distributed nationwide —$6.3 million of which went to Fulton County, Georgia—and funneled through collection of non—profit organizations dictating to election officials how to manage the election.

In particular, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) granted $6.3 million USD to Fulton County, Georgia. These unregulated private funds were predominantly used to:

(1) pay “ballot harvesters”;
(2) provide mobile ballot pick up units;
(3) deputize and pay political activists to manage ballots;
(4) pay election judges and poll workers;
(5) establish drop—boxes and satellite offices;
(6) pay local election officials and agents to recruit cities recognized as democratic strongholds to recruit other cities to apply for grants
from non—profits;
(7) consolidate counting centers in the urban core to facilitate the movement of hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots in secrecy without
legally required bi-partisan observation;
(8) initiate and implement two—tier ballot “curing” plan that illegally
counted ballots in Democrat strongholds and spoil similarly
situated ballots in Republican strongholds; and
(9) pay for and help design the plan to remove the poll watchers from one political party so that the critical responsibility of determining
the validity of the ballot and the validity of the count could be conducted without oversight.”

Read more:

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020CV342959-PETITION.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” “

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” ”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit.

1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the 2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the affidavits of expert witnesses.

2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.

3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.

Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation

4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Georgia election more screwed up and misrepresented than first apparent, Devil in details, Floyd County example, Want your small town to be off by 61 votes?

Georgia election more screwed up and misrepresented than first apparent, Devil in details, Floyd County example, Want your small town to be off by 61 votes?

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The voter participation rate in DeKalb was 67.8% a major red flag.”…Citizen Wells

 

Citizen Wells has been analyzing the Georgia election on the macro and mid levels.

But as we all know, the Devil is in the details.

And so it is in Georgia.

Examples of details hidden by summaries are in Floyd County, numerous counties that have too many errors for their size and multiple vote changes that have a bigger impact.

Floyd County.

You probably know by now that 2600 ballots were found there that allegedly were not rescanned and added to the totals.

From News 11 November 17, 2020.

“Nearly 2,600 ballots were not tallied on election night in Floyd County, the Secretary of State’s office said.

Georgia election official Gabriel Sterling said county election workers failed to upload votes from a memory card on election night. It was discovered during a statewide audit. ”

“Trump received 1,643 additional votes, Biden had 865 more votes and Jorgensen had 16 new votes. ”

In the recount data you might expect to find the variance of 2600, right?

Wrong!

Apparently there were other issues found because Biden came up with a deficit gain of 92!

Another detail devil.

Counties with high error rates for their size.

Imagine you live in small town America or a small city.

Would the following vote count error be acceptable to you?

County     Total     Difference

Appling                  8,391                  50

Dougherty            35,338                 43

LIberty                  21,422                 33

Peach                     12,564                 19

Pickens                  17,136                 20

Polk                        17,377                -22

Pulaski                    4,084                 25

Thomas                  21,914                61

Washington           9,478                 19

Whitfield               36,786                40

Small net vote difference with bigger impact.

Clarke County had only a change of -3 but a change of + 78 for Trump.

Columbia 7 with +69 for Trump.

Lowndes 2 with +70 for Trump.

Rockdale -6 with +241 for Trump.

Ware 1 with with +74 for Trump.

Election official Gabriel Sterling made many misleading statements and his insistence on small changes in most counties is obviously one.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Georgia Trump lawsuits shocking per attorney Jay Sekulow, Filed Nov 23-24, “This is something completely separate.”, “how poorly run they ran the elections”

Georgia Trump lawsuits shocking per attorney Jay Sekulow, Filed Nov 23-24, “This is something completely separate.”, “how poorly run they ran the elections”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The voter participation rate in DeKalb was 67.8% a major red flag.”…Citizen Wells

 

From NewsMax November 21, 2020.

“Jordan Sekulow to Newsmax TV: Pending Georgia Lawsuit ‘Shocking’

An election challenge lawsuit planned to be filed early this week is new and will be “shocking,” according to President Donald Trump lawyer Jordan Sekulow on Newsmax TV.

“We have got lawsuits likely to be filed in Georgia on either Monday or Tuesday; I can’t get into the details,” Sekulow, the son of Trump personal attorney Jay Sekulow, told Saturday’s “America Right Now.

“I can’t tell you right now, but what’s coming in Georgia will be shocking, when we file this in federal court Monday or Tuesday,” Jordan Sekulow told host Tom Basile. “It’s nothing that we have talked before. It’s not what you heard in the press conference [Thursday] either.

“This is something completely separate.””

“”They’ve got to be outcome determinative, but I will tell you, the Lt. Gov. [Geoff Duncan] in Georgia, the Secretary of State in Georgia [Brad Raffensperger] in Georgia, they’re in for quite a shock on Monday and Tuesday about how poorly they run and they ran – there’s going to be a proof – of how poorly run they ran the elections in one of their major counties,” Sekulow said.”

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/georgia-lawsuit-jordan-sekulow-constitution/2020/11/21/id/998154/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

“Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,”  “The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.”…Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Arizona’s voter participation rate is 78.6%. Wisconsin’s is over 89%. Somebody is lying.”…Citizen Wells

 

From Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State.

 

1. “Qualified electors casting ballots in person on Election Day in Maricopa County submitted their completed ballot to an electronic tabulation machine. Numerous voters were alerted by these devices to a facial irregularity in their ballot—frequently an ostensible ‘overvote’ — but were induced by poll workers to override the tabulator’s rejection of the ballot in the good faith belief that their vote would be duly registered and tabulated. In actuality, overriding the electronic tabulator’s alert automatically disqualifies the putative ‘overvotes’ without additional review or adjudication.​”

2. Arizona law requires that putative overvotes be subjected to further review in
an effort to discern the actual intent of the voter. While this safeguard was afforded to putative overvotes cast on early ballots and on Election Day ballots that poll workers properly segregated in a separate repository, potentially thousands of voters across Maricopa County have been disenfranchised by systematic improper tabulator overrides.

3. Upon information and belief, the adjudication and tabulation of these ballots
will prove determinative of the outcome of the election for President of the United States in Arizona and/or other contested offices in Maricopa County.

4. Declaratory, injunctive and mandamus remedies are necessary to prevent
irreparable injury to the Plaintiffs, vindicate the clear directives of the Arizona Legislature, ensure the fair and equal treatment of all Maricopa County electors, and secure the integrity of the results of the November 3, 2020 general election.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-complaint-with-attachments.pdf

From NewsMax November 11, 2020.

“An Arizona state court judge refused to seal evidence, including video taken within a polling place and declaration of witnesses with their name and other identifying information, in a case brought by the Trump campaign and Arizona Republican Party claiming voter fraud.

Judge Daniel Kiley refused the request, Phoenix NBC network affiliate KPNX reported, apparently agreeing with attorneys for Maricopa County officials.

The Trump campaign and Arizona GOP filed the lawsuit on Saturday claiming that thousands of votes in Maricopa County were unlawfully disqualified or considered ”overvotes” — voided because they were marked for more than one candidate in the same race. They asked for the sealing of the evidence in a subsequent motion.

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/arizona-fraud-evidence-seal/2020/11/11/id/996632/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

“the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid.””...Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman

“estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” …Wisconsin GOP

“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”…Jesus, John 8:32

 

From The Wisconsin Elections Commission November 4, 2020.

“Madison, WI – Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official, issued the following statement:

“Wisconsin’s counting and reporting of unofficial results has gone according to law. Our municipal and county clerks have worked tirelessly throughout the night to make sure every valid ballot is counted and reported accurately.”

https://elections.wi.gov/node/7231

We now know that is a lie!

From JustTheNews November 8, 2020.

“The Constitution allows only for state legislatures to change the ways elections are conducted, but memos show Wisconsin election supervisors made three substantial changes in 2020 that impact potentially tens of thousands of ballots in a battleground state that Joe Biden won by just 20,000.

Records reviewed by Just the News show that an executive branch agency called the Wisconsin Election Commission:

  • permitted local county election clerks to cure spoiled ballots by filling in missing addresses for witnesses even though state law invalidates any ballot without a witness address.
  • exempted as many as 200,000 citizens from voter ID rules by allowing them to claim the COVID-19 pandemic caused them to be “indefinitely confined.”
  • failed to purge 130,000 names from outdated voter rolls as required by law.

The question now is whether those changes  — in particular the instructions allowing clerks to cure ballots with missing information — will open the door for the courts to intervene as President Trump looks to contest ballot practices in multiple battleground states. The Trump campaign is seeking a recount in Wisconsin.”

“Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, told local radio station 1130 WISN this week that the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid. That ballot is not valid.” The Dan O’Donnell Show, meanwhile, claimed that the Wisconsin GOP “estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” ”

Read more:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/many-200000-wisconsin-residents-may-have-voted-absentee-without-having

The Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe have no credibility.

The Margin of victory at this juncture is approx. a 20k lead for Biden.

President Trump has already requested a recount.

Next let’s look at the voter turnout percentages in Wisconsin.

There were not more votes than registered voters as some reports alleged.

There are approx. 3.7 registered voters in Wisconsin.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.7 you get 89 %.

A very high turnout rate and a red flag.

But wait, you are once again not being given the truth.

From the Star Tribune September 29, 2020.

“The Wisconsin Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether to go along with conservatives who argue that 130,000 voters should be removed from the rolls in the hotly contested presidential battleground state, while the Democratic attorney general defended not purging them.

The Wisconsin case is one of several lawsuits across the country, many in battleground states, that seek to purge voters from registration rolls. It is being closely watched because President Donald Trump won the swing state by fewer than 23,000 votes in 2016. However, the lawsuit was unlikely to be resolved by the state Supreme Court before the Nov. 3 election just five weeks away.

Justices on the court controlled 4-3 by conservatives gave little indication during the hour-long oral arguments how they were leaning.

The Wisconsin case hinges on whether voters who were identified as potentially having moved should be removed from the voter registration database. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative law firm, argued that the state elections commission broke the law when it did not remove voters from the rolls who did not respond within 30 days to a mailing last year indicating they had been identified as someone who potentially moved.”

Read more:

https://www.startribune.com/voter-purge-case-before-wisconsin-supreme-court/572571142/

Now let’s take the 3,684,726  registered voters including the number that was not active and subtract the inactive number 130,000 and we get 3.5 million.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.5 you get 94 %.

A definite red flag.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/