Tag Archives: October 24

Sidney Powell motion for Brady material and hold prosecutors in contempt meshes with Durham prosecution, October 24, 2019, Fake Russian collusion explained 101

Posted on October 25, 2019 | 15 comments

Sidney Powell motion for Brady material and hold prosecutors in contempt meshes with Durham prosecution, October 24, 2019, Fake Russian collusion explained 101

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

“Prosecutors Brandon Van Grack of the Justice Department’s national security division, who was formerly on Mr. Mueller’s team, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, of Washington, provided little explanation as to why they were not turning over the transcripts.”…Pittsburgh Post-Gazette June 1, 2019

“McCabe had a role in crafting the “insurance policy” in the event Mr. Trump was elected.  Expect to find Comey a part of that also.”…Attorney Sydney Powell

 

Attorney Sidney Powell, who knows the Justice Department inside and out, filed a motion yesterday, October 24, 2019, concurrently with the apparent start of prosecution by John Durham.

The contents of the motion could be considered an explanation into the fake Russian Collusion narrative, i.e. Justice Department corruption 101.

 

“FLYNN REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF BRADY MATERIAL AND TO HOLD THE PROSECUTORS IN CONTEMPT”

“TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES IN REPLY…………………………………………………………….. 3
A. The Government’s Suppression of the Actual Strzok-Page Texts Mandates a Finding of Contempt……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
1. “A Pretext to Interview Some People.” …………………………………………………………………. 6
2. “Many Meetings” to Strategize the Interview of Flynn………………………………………….. 7
3. “Off the Rails” ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
4. The Plan Worked: Mr. Flynn was “Relaxed,” “Jocular,” and “Unguarded.”…………. 9
5. Reporting Back: Flynn’s “Demeanor Was Sure.”
He Was Telling the Truth or Believed He Was Telling the Truth…………………………….. 10
6. Agents Manipulate the Flynn 302……………………………………………………………………….. 10
7. February 14: “Launch f 302.”…………………………………………………………………………….. 11
8. The Media Leak Strategy with DOJ……………………………………………………………………. 12
9. The FBI Opens Obstruction Case on President Trump
and “Locks In” Case on “Flynn?”………………………………………………………………………….. 12
B. The FBI Knew Its Entire Investigation of Flynn Was A Pretext. ……………………………. 14
C. Brady Requires the Government to Produce Exculpatory Evidence in Time for the Defense to Use It. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 18
D. Full, Actual, Unredacted Documents, The Original 302, Drafts Prior to
February 10, 2019, and the 1A File and Subfiles Must be Produced Pursuant to Brady. 22
1. Agent Strzok’s notes do not appear to have been taken contemporaneously during the  Interview………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24
2. The 302 statement that Mr. Flynn was told the “nature of the interview” is false. … 25
3. Mr. Van Grack’s Productions of Flynn 302s Were Incomplete and Misleading. …… 25
4. The Final 302 Falsely States that Mr. Flynn Remembered Making Four to Five Calls from the Dominican Republic When Both Sets of Notes State He Does Not Remember.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
5. The Notes Provide No Support for a Chunk of the 302 That Purports to Provide a “Factual Basis” for the Plea. ………………………………………………………………………………….. 27
6. Mr. Flynn’s Statements Were Not Material. ……………………………………………………….. 27
7. The Flynn 302 Is Discussed in the Page-Strzok Texts and Was Not Approved by McCabe Until the Day After Flynn Resigned from the White House……………………….. 28
E. Classified Information Will Prove that Any Investigation of Mr. Flynn Was
Pretextual. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28
1. Yunis Mandates Disclosure of The Classified Information Requested as Brady…….. 28
2. The DIA Reports of Briefing and Debriefings Belie Any Basis to Investigate Mr. Flynn and Likely Further Undermine the Factual Basis for the Plea……………………….. 29
3. The Letter from Sir Mark Lyall Grant to the Incoming National Security Team
Invalidates Any Use of Information from Christopher Steele, Further Undermines Any “Russia” Connection, and is Being Suppressed. ……………………………………………………… 30
CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE……………………………………………………………………………………… 33
Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 129”

“CONCLUSION
In its relentless pursuit of Mr. Flynn, the government became the architect of an injustice so egregious it is “repugnant to the American criminal system.” Russell, 411 U.S. at 428 (citations omitted). For these reasons and those in our original Motion and Brief in Support, this Court should compel the government to produce the evidence the defense requests in its full, unredacted
form. Given the clear and convincing evidence herein, this Court should issue an order to show cause why the prosecutors should not be held in contempt; and should dismiss the entire prosecution for outrageous government misconduct.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.129.0_1.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Advertisement

15 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Courts, FBI, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Philip Berg DC eligibility rally, Removal of Obama with or without Issa, Citizen Wells open thread, October 24, 2010

Posted on October 24, 2010 | 51 comments

Philip Berg DC eligibility rally, Removal of Obama with or without Issa

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From World Net Daily October 23, 2010.

“D.C. eligibility rally boldly blasts Obama as ‘fraud’
Attorney Berg motivates crowd to ask, ‘Where’s birth certificate?'”

“A rally today at the U.S. Capitol pulled no punches in declaring President Barack Obama an “imposter” and “fraud” who should resign before a constitutional crisis of his own making rips apart the nation.

The rally was called by Philip Berg, a Pennsylvania attorney who runs the ObamaCrimes.com website and was the first to sue over allegations Obama is constitutionally ineligible to occupy the Oval Office.

“The main thrust of the rally,” Berg told WND, “was to get out the continuing message that Obama is a phony, a fraud, an imposter, and [his eligibility to serve as president] is the biggest hoax committed against the U.S. in 234 years.”

Berg believes there is enough evidence, both hard and circumstantial, to justify an investigation into whether or not Obama is a “natural-born citizen” as required by the Constitution to serve as president. Berg is looking for a court with “the guts” to demand Obama provide proof of his eligibility.”

“Berg told WND he isn’t pushing for Obama’s resignation out of some right-wing venom – he’s a life-long Democrat – or racism or hatred, but out of dedication to preserving the U.S. Constitution and out of concern about what will happen to the country if Obama continues his presidency and is discovered ineligible years down the road.
“My goal is to have a peaceful revolution before something worse breaks out,” Berg said. “The sooner the better.”

He continued, “Obama is walking all over the Constitution, destroying the Constitution through holding office while ineligible, through a health-care plan that is clearly unconstitutional, and he has plans for more unconstitutional actions. I’m doing this because nothing is more important to the U.S. than its Constitution.”

Berg’s initial emergency appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court when Obama first took office, like those of a number of other attorneys, were not accepted by the panel. He has one case pending, and it is being prepared for presentation to the high court now.”

“He says that if it weren’t for the U.S. media, Obama would already have been exposed and removed from office.

“The media gave him a free ride,” he said.”

“Berg’s is not the only one who has challenged Obama’s residency in the White House. A case is developing involving Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who has questioned the legitimacy of the orders in the U.S. military under a president whose eligibility is under question.

Another case being handled by California attorneys Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation and Orly Taitz is on behalf of another presidential candidate and challenges Obama’s inclusion on the ballot.

Yet another claims Congress failed to perform its constitutional obligations to investigate Obama.

There’s even been a series of discussions about impeachment.”

Read more:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=219109

“The court concludes … that the public’s need to know is more compelling”

From The Wall Street Journal .

“Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Joe Miller meets supporters at his Anchorage, Alaska, campaign headquarters Thursday.“Mr. Miller is a public figure by virtue of the fact that he’s a candidate for the U.S. Senate,” said Superior Court Judge Winston Burbank at a hearing. He continued, “The court concludes … that the public’s need to know is more compelling than Mr. Miller’s right to privacy.”

He ruled some information shouldn’t be disclosed for reasons including the privacy of the people involved and client-attorney privilege. He added that the records shouldn’t be disclosed any earlier than Tuesday at 4 p.m., to give Mr. Miller time to appeal the decision before then. “Joe is going to confer with his attorney to see if an appeal is even necessary,” said a spokesman for Mr. Miller.

The decision was a twist in a battle involving several news organizations who had together sued the Fairbanks North Star Borough, where Mr. Miller once worked as a lawyer, for records about the Republican candidate’s potential misuse of government computers and the circumstances of his departure from the job.

Mr. Miller was allowed Tuesday to intervene in the lawsuit to push for the protection of the records. If the employment records are ultimately released, they could cast a spotlight on the candidate’s previous professional behavior at a critical point in the election.

Mr. Miller, who is backed by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and the Tea Party Express, beat Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the GOP primary and now faces Ms. Murkowski who is running a strong campaign as a write-in candidate, and Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams, the Democratic candidate.”

Obama can be removed with or without Darrell Issa.

From Citizen News.

““If Republicans take control of the House, there is “not a chance at this point” that they will try to impeach President Obama, a top Republican lawmaker said this week.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who would helm the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if the GOP wins on Election Day, said that his party will not try to bring impeachment charges simply because it disagrees with the president.
“Not a chance at this point. I don’t see it happening,” Issa said when asked if there is a chance of impeachment on Bloomberg’s “Political Capital,” which airs over the weekend.”

“Before proceeding, I want to be crystal clear. Obama is apparently not a legal president, is in fact a usurper, and as such does not have to be impeached, but simply arrested and removed from the White House in hand cuffs.

The First Amendment to the US Constitution provides for petitioning government, specifically the US House of Representatives, for a redress of grievances. This includes a petition or demand for the arrest or impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama.

From the 110th Congress House Rules Manual — House Document No. 108-241.

Petitions, memorials, and private bills

“Petitions, memorials, and other papers addressed to the House may be presented by the Speaker as well as by a Member (IV, 3312). Petitions from the country at large are presented by the Speaker in the manner prescribed by the rule (III, 2030; IV, 3318; VII, 1025). A Member may present a petition from the people of a State other than his own (IV, 3315, 3316). The House itself may refer one portion of a petition to one committee and another portion to another committee (IV, 3359, 3360), but ordinarily the reference of a petition does not come before the House itself. A committee may receive a petition only through the House (IV, 4557).”

Jefferson’s Manual as adopted in the US Congress House Rules Manual.

“In the <<NOTE: Sec. 603. Inception of impeachment proceedings in the
House.>> House there are various methods of setting an impeachment in
motion: by charges made on the floor on the responsibility of a Member
or Delegate (II, 1303; III, 2342, 2400, 2469; VI, 525, 526, 528, 535,
536); by charges preferred by a memorial, which is usually referred to a
committee for examination (III, 2364, 2491, 2494, 2496, 2499, 2515; VI,
543); by a resolution dropped in the hopper by a Member and referred to
a committee (Apr. 15, 1970, p. 11941; Oct. 23, 1973, p. 34873); by a
message from the President (III, 2294, 2319; VI, 498); by charges
transmitted from the legislature of a State (III, 2469) or territory
(III, 2487) or from a grand jury (III, 2488); or from facts developed
and reported””

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2010/10/23/obama-impeachment-impeachment-process-issa-not-a-chance-of-obama-impeachment-oh-really/

51 Comments

Posted in Attorneys, Barack Obama, Berg, Birth Certificate, Citizen, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Congress, constitution, Courts, DC, Election, Election Law, Election update, Federal Court, Government, impeachment, indictment, Judges, Lawyers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Supreme Court, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, Washington DC, white house

Tagged , , , ,

H1N1, Obama Declares National Emergency, October 24, 2009, Bill of Rights revoked?, Stafford Act, National Emergencies Act, Public Health Emergency Fund, Federal emergency authorities, Rights have been now officially suspended.

Posted on October 24, 2009 | 75 comments

I first heard about Obama declaring a national emergency due to the H1N1 flu this morning as I was driving down the highway. I was warned many months ago that the flu was coming and that Obama would use it as an excuse to exercise more power over the American public. One of the people that warned me of this, in March of 2009, before the public awareness of a coming flu, a retired military officer, just sent me some information.

October 24, 2009,  approx 7:50 PM ET.

“Obama declares swine flu a national emergency”

“President Barack Obama declared the swine flu outbreak a national emergency and empowered his health secretary to suspend federal guidelines at hospitals and speed up how infected people might receive treatment in a disaster.

The declaration that Obama signed late Friday means Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius to bypass federal rules when opening alternative care sites, such as offsite hospital centers at schools or community centers, if needed.

Hospitals could modify patient rules — for example, requiring them to give less information during a hectic time — to quicken access to treatment, with government approval. The declaration, which the White House announced Saturday, allows HHS in some cases to let hospitals relocate emergency rooms offsite to reduce flu-related burdens and to protect noninfected patients.

Administration officials said the declaration was a pre-emptive move designed to make decisions easier when they need to be made. Officials said this was not in response to any single development on an outbreak that has lasted months and has killed more than 1,000 people in the United States.

It was the second of two steps needed to give Sebelius extraordinary powers during a crisis. On April 26, the administration declared swine flu a public health emergency, allowing the shipment of roughly 12 million doses of flu-fighting medications from a federal stockpile to states in case they eventually needed them. At the time, there were 20 confirmed cases in the U.S. of people recovering easily. There was no vaccine against swine flu, but the CDC had taken the initial step necessary for producing one.”

Read more:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091024/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_swine_flu

 

“What does this mean for YOU?   It means the Federal Government has just declared its right to revoke the Bill of Rights:
 
A National Emergency, under the Stafford Act:
 
Quote:
With respect to the current outbreak, the Public Health Emergency Fund is available (but is
currently unfunded)17 and Emergency Use Authorizations have been granted by FDA.18 However,
the Secretary’s waiver and modification authority has not been activated because there is no
concurrent presidential declaration under either the Stafford Act or the National Emergencies Act.
(comment: report published in May 2009)
 
So declaring this emergency doesn’t really make more funds available.  They don’t EXIST!  So, that’s not the reason……
Quote:
A presidential declaration under the Stafford Act triggers federal emergency authorities that are
independent of the Secretary’s public health emergency authorities. Declarations under the
Stafford Act fall into two categories: emergency declarations and major disaster declarations. As
of this point in time, there have been no Stafford Act declarations pertaining to the current
influenza A(H1N1) virus outbreak. A presidential emergency declaration under the Stafford Act
authorizes the President to direct federal agencies to support state and local emergency assistance
activities; coordinate disaster relief provided by federal and non-federal organizations; provide
technical and advisory assistance to state and local governments; provide emergency assistance
through federal agencies; remove debris through grants to state and local governments; provide
assistance to individuals and households for temporary housing and uninsured personal needs;

and assist state and local governments in the distribution of medicine, food, and consumables.19
The total amount of assistance available is limited in an emergency declaration to $5 million,
“unless the President determines that there is a continuing need; Congress must be notified if the
$5 million ceiling is breached.
 
Source:  Document prepared for Congress in May, 2009:  http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40560_20090506.pdf
 
Now, we’re getting down to the real reasons…..
 
Further of interest from this document:
 
Quote:
A major disaster declaration authorizes the President to offer all the assistance authorized under
an emergency declaration, and further authorizes funds for the repair and restoration of federal
facilities, unemployment assistance, emergency grants to assist low-income migrant and seasonal
farm workers, food coupons and distribution, relocation assistance, crisis counseling assistance
and training, community disaster loans, emergency communications, and emergency public
transportation.23 Additionally, the total amount of assistance provided in a major disaster
declaration is not subject to a ceiling in the same way as under an emergency declaration.
 
And here is the money quote:
 
Quote:

The Public Health Service Act and the Stafford Act contain authorities that
allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the President, respectively, to take certain
actions during emergencies or disasters. While the primary authority for quarantine and isolation
in the United States resides at the state level, the federal government has jurisdiction over
interstate and border quarantine. Border entry and border closing issues may arise in the context
of measures designed to keep individuals who have, or may have, influenza A(H1N1) from
crossing U.S. borders. Aliens with the H1N1 virus can be denied entry, but American citizens
cannot be excluded from the United States solely because of a communicable disease, although
they may be quarantined or isolated at the border for health reasons. Airlines have considerable
discretion to implement travel restrictions relating to the safety and/or security of flights and other
passengers and crew. In addition, the federal government has broad legal authority to regulate and
control the navigable airspace of the United States in dealing with incidents involving
communicable diseases. States have authority to initiate other emergency measures such as
mandatory vaccination orders and certain nonpharmaceutical interventions such as school
closures, which may lessen the spread of an infectious disease. The International Health
Regulations adopted by the World Health Organization in 2005 provide a framework for
international cooperation against infectious disease threats.

The use of these emergency measures to contain the influenza A(H1N1) virus outbreak may raise
a classic civil rights issue: to what extent can an individual’s liberty be curtailed to advance the
common good? The U.S. Constitution and federal civil rights laws provide for individual due
process and equal protection rights as well as a right to privacy, but these rights are balanced
against the needs of the community.
 
And there you have it, in black and white.  I make no determination as to whether H1N1A is truly the public threat they are presenting, although there have been deaths of children at a concerning rate, even here in Michigan – the fact is, the Stafford Act allows the Federal Government to strip away all your rights.  While this National Emergency is in effect, this gives the Federal Government carte blanche to use this declaration for whatever it pleases.  Rights have been now officially suspended.”
 
Stephanie S. Jasky,   Founder, Director
Follow Us on Twitter

https://twitter.com/FedUpUSA

http://fedupusa.org

75 Comments

Posted in 1918 flu pandemic, 2009 flu pandemic, Announcements, Associated press, Avian flu, Barack Obama, Bill of Rights, CDC, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil rights, Commander in Chief, Congress, constitution, Constitution Hall of Shame, Czars, DC, Deaths, Democrats, drugs, Elderly, Emergency, FEMA, First Amendment, Flu, Government, H1N1 virus, Habeas Corpus, Health Department, Health Insurance, Healthcare bill, Hospitals, indictment, Indonesia, influenza, Judges, Justice, Lies, Martial law, Medicare, Military officers, News, NWO, Obama, Obama administration, Obama indictment, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records, Obama thugs, pandemic, Pharmaceuticals, press conference, Second Amendment, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Swine flu, The Case Against Barack Obama, Thought Police, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Department of Justice, US House of Representatives, US Senate, Usurper, Vaccines, Virus, Washington DC, white house, WHO, World Health Organization

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Nevada elections, October 24, 2009, Nevada politicians, Nevada Grassroots Coalition, Clark County, Nevada State Legislature, Take Back Nevada, Clark County Library

Posted on October 18, 2009 | 145 comments

 Nevadalegislators
If You Want to Help
Grassroots Conservatives
Take Back Nevada,
Don’t Miss This Event.
 
JOIN US AND TAKE ACTION:
Location: Clark County Library
1401 E Flamingo Rd • Las Vegas, NV 89119
Phone: (702) 507-3400
 
This Saturday October 24, 2009 at 3:30 P.M.
Seating is Limited so RSVP Today!
 
Why are so many Nevada politicians concerned
with holding on to power rather than listening to voters?
And even less concerned with benefits for the people!
 
We The People are tired of not being listened to and we are taking action. Over the past eight months, The Nevada Grassroots Coalition has made great progress in rebuilding and reenergizing people in Clark County to take back our state in 2010.
 
With 29 assembly districts and 12 senate districts, Clark County is pivotal to the success of our movement in 2010. Via our right to vote, we intend to terminate the terms of those members in the Nevada State Legislature who continually choose to ignore the will of the people and who choose to spend without regard to the income of the state.
 
With only 8 short months to the primaries and 13 months until the General elections it is time for us to stop complaining, roll up our sleeves, and get to work.
 
The Nevada Grassroots Coalitions invite you to participate in this exciting event. This is a chance for you to meet the team that is now leading our county to win back our state. If you care about your family and our state You can not afford to  miss this event.
 
Join us and our feature speaker Nevada State Senate-Minority Whip Barbara K. Cegavske. The Senator will provide us unique insight as to what we need to do to win back our state. She will present a valuable analysis of the State Assembly and Senate for the 2010 elections.
 
Who should attend:
•   All Grassroots advocates, their friends and family, anyone who wants to help us win in 2010.
•  All Clark County Precinct District Managers and Precinct Captains.
•   All Current and Potential Candidates for State Office.
 
Please pledge your time, money and efforts to our cause. We will no longer tolerate the Nevada State government’s out-of-control spending, and “I-could-care-less” attitude for the concerns of citizens voicing their discontent.
 
To RSVP :
http://www.meetup.com/NEVADA-PATRIOTS/calendar/11461644/

145 Comments

Posted in Announcements, Board of Elections, conservatives, Deficit, Democrats, Election, Election 2010, Election Boards, Election update, Government, Grassroots, Money, Nevada, Obama, Obama lies, Obama taxes, Politics, Reform, republicans, Taxes, Tea Party, Town Hall, United States, US Constitution, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Judge Surrick dismissed, October 24, 2008 ruling, Philadelphia Daily News

Posted on October 25, 2008 | 11 comments

The Philadelphia Daily News has stated that Judge Surrick has ruled on the Philip J Berg Lawsuit. Judge Surrick allegedly ruled on the lawsuit last night, October 24, 2008. I have it on authority that the writer of the article, Michael Hinkelman, is a “rabid Obama supporter.” Mr Hinkelman does indeed publish gross inaccuracies (lies where I come from) about the case. The informed reader will immediately spot them.

Go ahead and read the biased account from the Philadelphia Daily News, the same newspaper that did not touch this story until the case was dismissed, and then read a more factual, authoritative account here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Here are some exerpts from the article:

“Posted on Sat, Oct. 25, 2008
Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News

hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.”

Read more here:

http://www.philly.com/dailynews

Here are Citizen Wells’ thoughts on the ruling:

  • The US Constitution rules. Judge Surrick is bound to uphold the Constitution.
  • Thousands of voters were disenfranchised during the Democratic Primaries.
  • Thousands more voters will be disenfranchised if Obama is allowed to remain on the ballot.
  • As the election progresses, control of the election process will shift from the states to the Federal Government. The following officials will be bound to uphold the Constitution:
  1. Secretary of State of each state.
  2. Election Board Officials.
  3. Electors.
  4. Governors.
  5. Judges.
  • All of the above officials will be held accountable.
  • Taking a cue from the Democratic Party will not be a valid excuse for not upholding the Constitution and allowing Obama, an illegal alien, to remain on the ballot or be voted for by electors.

Philip J Berg will appeal Judge Surrick’s decision and take the case to the Supreme Court if necessary. The Citizen Wells blog will produce an article soon to help clarify how the Constitution must be upheld. In conjunction with the American public, we will hold all responsible for the election, accountable.

Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

11 Comments

Posted in Acorn, Acorn voter fraud, amended complaint, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Board of Elections, Chicago machine, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, Democrats, DNC, Election, Election 2008, Election Boards, Election update, FEC, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Impeach Senator Obama, impeachment, indictment, Indonesia, Jeff Schreiber, Justice, Kenya, Natural born citizen, NC voters, News, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Secretary of State, The Case Against Barack Obama, United States, US Constitution, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , , ,

Andy Martin, New York, News conference, October 24, 2008, Obama investigation, Hawaii birth certificate, NBC News, Colin Powell, Tom Brokaw

Posted on October 24, 2008 | 17 comments

Andy Martin is in New York, back from his investigation of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Here is the latest release from Martin:

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
 
INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN LANDS IN NEW YORK TO PLAN NEW STRATEGY FOR DEALING WITH BARACK OBAMA, COLIN POWELL AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA
 
INTERNET POWER BEGINS TO DRIVE THE “TWO ELECTIONS OF 2008”
 
ANDY SAYS NBC NEWS’ TREATMENT OF COLIN POWELL IS EVIDENCE OF “TWO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS” IN 2008
 
(NEW YORK)(October 24, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin has landed in New York and will hold a news conference Friday afternoon, October 24th (today) to disclose plans for the final week of his efforts to “tell the truth about Barack Obama.” Martin is the author of “Obama: The Man behind The Mask.”
 
“When we conceived our investigative trip to Hawai’i last month, no media or writers had been to Hawai’i to dig into the truth about ‘the hidden Obama’ or his secret ‘birth certificate’ that no one has ever seen. Now everyone is buying tickets to Honolulu, even my competing authors, see http://wnd.com/index.php?fa= PAGE.view&pageId=78954. We have given Hawai’i tourism a boost. We have started a ‘rush to land’ in Hawai’i.
 
“Every Barack Obama showed up in Honolulu, looking for his ‘true’ birth certificate. Will wonders never cease?
 
“The very fact that we promoted a pioneering investigation of Obama’s past in Hawai’i, and that others are now following our lead, confirms that we have created the Internet powerhouse of
2008.
 
“But the hour is late; today we announce our general plans for the final days of the campaign to tell the truth about Senator Obama.
 
“I would be remiss if I also did not express my extreme dismay at the mainstream media’s latest act of malpractice,  ‘Republican’ Quisling Colin Powell’s appearance on NBC.
 
“The Powell affair explains a great deal about media reality in 2008. We have two presidential election campaigns being conducted simultaneously: one by the mainstream media to force feed us Barack Obama, and one on the internet where truth generally prevails, with notable exceptions, and where Obama is not our uncrowned king.
 
“What has become increasingly apparent to me is that a vast segment of the electorate has completely tuned out traditional media and has come to rely exclusively on Internet powerhouses such as ContrarianCommentary.com. Advertisers be warned.
 
“When you see turncoat and racial huckster Colin Powell being given an uncritical platform on NBC news to stab his ‘friend’ John McCain in the back, you know why the American people have tuned out the broadcast media and stopped turning to the print media. Tom Brokaw has morphed from a respected journalist into an Obama whore.
 
“The Republican Party made Colin Powell and promoted him to the highest offices in the land. How did he repay Republicans? By stabbing the party in the back. Fortunately for me, I was never a member of the ‘cult’ of Colin Powell. I always saw through him as the ass kisser and mediocre military man he was.
 
“Had Powell previously made any of his criticisms known in speeches to party leaders, or at party functions? Not a word. He just waited until the last minute, when Obama appears to be leading, to start ass kissing and start looking for a new job to burnish his tarnished reputation.
 
“Did Brokaw press Powell with probing questions? Not on your life. They were two lovers on Meet The Press. Powell went on national television and smeared the party with an unfiltered attack on John McCain.
 
“Ironically, I tend to agree with some of Powell’s observations. But both parties are being run by their extremist wings: right-wing Republicans and left-wing Democrats.
 
“It is the manner of Powell’s betrayal, and NBC News’ function as a megaphone for Obama propaganda, that I find despicable. The presentation of Powell’s message uncritically and without probing demolishes NBC’s credibility. Going on TV to trash the party that made him is a true indicator of what a sycophant and brownnoser Powell always was. That Tom Brokaw would allow this ‘news’ charade to be presented under his name shows why people no longer trust and no longer believe and no longer are turning to the mainstream media for election information.
 
“Where was Powell’s backbone when he could have helped stop the Iraq war by forcefully speaking out? I am a Republican and I marched in the streets of Washington and New York to protest the imminent attacks. But Powell was more concerned with ‘polishing’ his legacy than with being a true leader in 2003. Now he is groveling to Barack Obama at the eleventh hour, hoping to snare a few crumbs from the Democrats. I would like to see Obama lose just to keep Powell out of office. Powell is despicable.
 
“Instead of challenging Powell’s perfidiousness, the mainstream media have been parroting and promoting him. No wonder people tune out this propaganda. Powell is the mainstream media’s designated Republican backstabber. He had jelly in his spine in Viet-Nam; he had jelly in his spine in 1991. He lied to the American people in 2003, and now he is groveling to Barack Obama and looking for a new handout at the highest levels of government.
 
“I give Powell a ‘Bronx cheer’ in honor of his birthplace. Powell and his megaphones in the mainstream media are the reason there are two election campaigns being conducted, one on the Internet where truth is the goal, and one in the mainstream media where liberal lies are the currency,” Martin will state.
 
NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:
 
WHO:     
 
National anti-Obama leader and Obama Author Andy Martin   
 
WHAT:    
 
National anti-Obama leader Andy Martin announces plans for the final week of the anti-Obama movement
WHERE:
 
909 Third Avenue, public sidewalk in front of FDR Station, New York 
           
WHEN: Friday, October 24, 6:00 P. M.
 
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329
 
TO PURCHASE BOOK: Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies from http://www.OrangeStatePress.com
 
ANDY E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com”

17 Comments

Posted in Andy Martin, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Chicago machine, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, Colin Powell, corruption, Democrats, DNC, Election, Election 2008, Election update, FEC, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Illinois bar, Impeach Senator Obama, impeachment, indictment, Indonesia, Journalism, Justice, Kenya, media, Natural born citizen, News, Obama 2006 Kenya, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Senator Obama, The Case Against Barack Obama, United States, US Constitution, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Judge Surrick ruling, Philip J Berg lawsuit, October 24, 2008, US Constitution, Obama ineligible to be president, Middle East, Libya, Kenya, Obama threat to US, Uphold Constitution

Posted on October 24, 2008 | 36 comments

Judge Surrick will provide a ruling any minute on the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Barack Obama is Indonesian and ineligible to be president. Lawsuit outcomes are hinged on very tight legal wordings and the burden of
proof placed on the plaintiff. Regardless of legal wrangling in court,
regardless of the ruling by Judge Surrick, the US Constitution must be upheld and those charged with upholding the US Constitution must do so and be held accountable. This includes Barack Obama.

Here is what we know:

  • The DNC did not vet Obama.
  • The MSM has supported Obama and not vetted him.
  • Obama has documented long time close ties to corruption in Chicago, Illinois and the Middle East.
  • Obama has close ties to Dubious connections in the Middle East and
    Africa. Three people close to Obama, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan and Raila Odinga, have visited Libya.
  • Obama traveled to Pakistan when he was young when travel to Pakistan by US citizens was restricted.
  • Obama was born in Kenya.
  • Obama was adopted by his stepfather, Soetoro, became an Indonesian
    citizen and studied the Koran.
  • Obama and the Obama camp stole the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton using voter fraud and illegal campaign donations.
  • Obama has lied about most aspects of his life and past associations,
    including, but not limited to, his socialist party connections and Acorn involvement.

With the exception of the Kennedy assasination, Citizen Wells has never
been much of a conspiracy theorist. However, given the body of evidence,
I am inclined to believe that there is a Middle Eastern, radical Muslim,
connection to Obama, perhaps Libyan, that intends to destroy the US
from within. Too many events and associations have come into focus
to ignore this possibility.

Barack Obama, regardless of his many dubious connections, is not eligible
to be POTUS. Irrespective of any lawsuits in court, the US Constitution
must be upheld. Citizen Wells and the American public will hold all
accountable. Citizen Wells will provide an article soon that will
provide insight into upholding the US Constitution.

Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

36 Comments

Posted in Acorn, Acorn voter fraud, African Press, amended complaint, Announcements, Auchi, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Board of Elections, Chicago machine, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, corruption, Crime, Criminal Complaint, Democratic Socialists of America, Democrats, DNC, Election, Election 2008, Election update, FEC, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Impeach Senator Obama, impeachment, indictment, Indonesia, Islam, Joseph Cari, Justice, Kenya, Koran, Leftist, Logan Act, Marxist, Moammar Ghadafi, Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, Muslims, Natural born citizen, News, Obama 2006 Kenya, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, ODM, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Qaddafi, Railla Odinga, Senator Obama, Terrorists, The Case Against Barack Obama, Tony Rezko, United States, US Constitution, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,