Category Archives: Election Boards

Tagged Exemplifies Wisconsin voting irregularities noted by legislature, Parler is working to spread truth, Sewell v Racine WI school district election fiasco recounts

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

78 percent of mail in ballots in Aberdeen Mississippi ward fraudulent, New election ordered, Judge Jeff Weill finds evidence of fraud and criminal activity

Posted on March 4, 2021 | 2 comments

78 percent of mail in ballots in Aberdeen Mississippi ward fraudulent, New election ordered, Judge Jeff Weill finds evidence of fraud and criminal activity

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

From WCBI

“Notary Arrested, Charged With Voter Fraud In Connection With Aberdeen Alderman Election

A judge is ordering a new runoff election for the Ward 1 alderman seat in Aberdeen.

In the sixty-four-page order, Judge Jeff Weill not only calls for a new election but also finds evidence of fraud and criminal activity, in how absentee ballots were handled, how votes were counted, and the actions by some at the polling place.

In his ruling, the judge said that sixty-six of eighty-four absentee ballots cast in the June runoff were not valid and should never have been counted. Nicholas Holliday was declared the winner by a 37 vote margin. Robert Devaull challenged the results in court.

Judge Weill found many irregularities with absentee ballots. He issued a bench warrant for notary Dallas Jones, who notarized absentee ballots. During a hearing, Jones admitted violating notary duties.

“When you have an absentee ballot, there’s an envelope, you vote, fold the ballot, put it in an envelope, lick the flap, sign across the flap, then notary signs your election certificate, she testified that she didn’t sign in front of anybody, didn’t see anybody sign it, she just notarized it, just stamped them,” said Lydia Quarles, attorney for Robert Devaull.

In fact, Jones testified that she was called to the home of then Alderwoman Lady Garth in June to correct her father’s absentee ballot paperwork. While there, Jones testified she notarized “about 30 something ballots.”

The judge also found that 83 regular ballots were counted without being initialed by election workers.

Judge Weill also said there was clear evidence of voter intimidation and harassment at the polling place on election day. State law says candidates and supporters must stay at least 150 feet away from the polling place. In his ruling, the judge said Holliday, along with Police Chief Henry Randle, and former Mayor Maurice Howard acted as if they were above the law, repeatedly violating criminal statutes.”

https://www.wcbi.com/notary-arrested-charged-voter-fraud-connection-aberdeen-alderman-election/

More here:

Tagged 78 percent of mail in ballots in Aberdeen Mississippi ward fraudulent, Judge Jeff Weill finds evidence of fraud and criminal activity, New election ordered

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

NH election audit “Windham Incident” step by step instructions to support Senate Bill SB43, “Hold the audit in Windham”, “Count all of the races”

Posted on March 3, 2021 | 1 comment

NH election audit “Windham Incident” step by step instructions to support Senate Bill SB43, “Hold the audit in Windham”, “Count all of the races”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

From Granite Grok March 3, 2021

“ACTION ITEM! – To RESOLVE the “Windham Incident” – DO THIS!”

“The resulting debacle has been aptly named the “Windham Incident.” You can help get it fixed! Support Senate Bill SB43 to perform a thorough election audit in the Town of Windham. Follow the step by step instructions in the “HOW TO SUPPORT SB43” section below. It is very easy to;

At the very least, choose the “Support this Bill” radio button on screen #1 to register your support and complete the next three screens. It will take 2 minutes for the entire process.

Option #1: Click the “I wish to Speak on this Bill” checkbox on the first screen to register to speak via zoom this Friday during the 10:30a hearing. If you do speak, please ask for and support amendments regarding any of the following (if proposed);

- Hold the audit in Windham
- Ensure 100% of the ballots are run through ALL of the voting machines
- Ensure the Windham Selectmen have input into defining the audit process
- Count the votes for all races on the ballot

Option #2: Submit your support in writing via email by clicking on the link: HouseElectionLawCommittee@Leg.state.nh.us on screen #4. If the email address does not work, then please copy and paste it into your email application. Some simple suggestions;

- “We need to know why the November General Election Day vote totals in Windham were off by so much after a recount.”
- “Windham should not be prevented from performing a thorough, complete and transparent audit on their voting machines.”
- “Election integrity is essential to retain the First in the Nation status for the Presidential Primaries.”
- “Count all of the races on the ballot.”
- “Windham wants to perform a forensic audit on the voting machines and ballots.”
- Provide your support for the potential amendments mentioned under Option #1.

After completing the process to support SB43, please consider clicking on the “Sign Up Again” button to SUPPORT the following Bills:

HB480 – This bill allows for public access to cast ballots. (makes it easier for ANYONE to perform their own audit!)

HB491 – This bill requires that ballots that include a federal office and which contain more than the allowable number of votes for an office on the ballot be returned to the voter for possible correction before the ballot is counted. This bill also requires the number of over voted ballots be included in the return for each election that includes a federal office.”

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/03/resolve-the-windham-incident-do-this

More here:

Tagged "Hold the audit in Windham", “Count all of the races", NH election audit "Windham Incident" step by step instructions to support Senate Bill SB43

1 Comment

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

Posted on March 2, 2021 | 3 comments

AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, 2021, Fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures. In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results. Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.”…Citizen Wells

Oral arguments were presented today before the US Supreme Court, March 2, 2021 in

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

More here:

Tagged 2021, AZ Attorney General Brnovich US Supreme Court petition listen to oral arguments read transcript March 2, Fighting to maintain election laws

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

Posted on March 2, 2021 | 3 comments

Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, 2021, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

This should be an open and closed case.

The procedures being questioned follow those of most states.

By the Constitution, the states have control over election procedures.

High powered law firms in conjunction with leftist activists such as Stacey Abrams, across the country, attacked many states’ election procedures.

In Georgia they folded and employed procedures that were contrary to state laws, thus invalidating election results.

Arizona’s honest Attorney General Mark Brnovich did not.

Hence today’s hearing.

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in Texas v PA GA MI WI, Dec 9, 2020.

“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

From the Brnovich Amicus Brief in the AZ Senate Maricopa County case Dec 30, 2020.

“The Arizona Legislature has broad authority to investigate the County’s
administration of the 2020 general election to determine whether Arizona law regarding election administration should remain the same or be changed. In resolving this matter, the Court should (1) recognize the Arizona Legislature’s broad authority to issue legislative subpoenas, (2) exercise deferential review of the subpoenas at issue, (3) hold that the presiding officer of either house or the chairman of any committee have the authority to issue subpoenas reviewing the County’s administration of elections, and (4) reject any effort by the County to interpose separation of powers concerns.”

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Maricopa%20County%20v%20Fann_%20AGO%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

From the Brnovich Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

Why did the Supreme Court take this case?

It goes to the core of the constitution and states rights to administer elections.

Secondly, AG Brnovich is on defense, not offense.

Corrupt Trump and supporters hater SOS Katie Hobbs elbow bumps Gov Ducey after prematurely certifying the AZ election results while the election hearing was being held.

More here:

Tagged 2021, Arizona AG Brnovich SCOTUS case importance in oral hearing today Tue March 2, Ga folded to Abrams DNC demands and AZ fighting to maintain election laws

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

Posted on March 1, 2021 | 6 comments

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

From Prescotte Enews March 1, 2021

“The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will review a case challenging Arizona’s election integrity laws concerning ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting.

In 2016, Arizona passed HB 2023 to restrict ballot harvesting in Arizona unless the person collecting the ballot is a family member, a person living in the same household, or a caregiver. Since the 1970s, Arizona has required people to vote at their specific precinct.

General Brnovich intervened on behalf of Arizona after the Secretary of State refused to defend the measures.

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is asking SCOTUS to bring clarity to these matters after a misguided ruling by the Ninth Circuit struck the measures down.”

https://prescottenews.com/index.php/2021/03/01/ballot-harvesting-brnovich-v-dnc/

Us Supreme Court

TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021
CASES FOR ARGUMENT TODAY

Tuesday, March 2
(2)
BRNOVICH V. DNC
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
V. DNC
(Consolidated – 1 hr. for argument)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalFebruary2021.pdf

No. 19-1257
Vide 19-1258

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

More here:

Tagged 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting, Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

Posted on March 1, 2021 | 2 comments

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

FROM THE SCOTUS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

Dec 30 2020 Petition for a writ of mandamus

“The Georgia Legislature has plenary authority to set the “Times, Places
and Manner” of Federal Elections and has clearly set forth the procedures to be
followed in verifying the identity of in-person voters as well as mail-in absentee ballot voters. The Georgia Secretary of State usurped that power by entering into a Settlement Agreement with the Democratic Party earlier this year and issuing an “Official Election Bulletin” that modified the Legislature’s clear procedures for verifying the identity of mail-in voters. The effect of the Secretary of State’s
unauthorized procedure is to treat the class of voters who vote by mail different from the class of voters who vote in-person, like Petitioner. That procedure dilutes the votes of in-person voters by votes from persons whose identities are less likely to verified as required by the legislative scheme. The Secretary’s unconstitutional modifications to the legislative scheme violated Petitioner’s Equal Protection rights by infringing on his fundamental right to vote. The Eleventh Circuit has held that Petitioner does not have standing to chall enge State action that dilutes his vote and infringes upon his constitutional right to Equal Protection. The questions presented are:”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-887/165104/20201230211038462_Emergency%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Mandamus.pdf

More here:

Tagged "expose the massive, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election"

Posted in Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Court of Appeals, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

Posted on March 1, 2021 | 2 comments

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

“¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.”…Wisconsin Supreme Court

From the SCOTUS, United States Supreme Court

No. 20-883

Donald J. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-883

Dec 30 2020

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed.

“After Election Day, Respondents encouraged the
counting of, and did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots received in violation of the “mandatory” requirement of Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2) that absentee ballots “in contravention of the [specified statutory absentee balloting] procedures…may not be counted.”
The foregoing raises the following questions:
1. Whether WEC and local election officials violated Art. II, § 1, cl. 2 of the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of
Equal Protection during the 2020 Presidential election by implementing unauthorized absentee voting practices in disregard of the Wisconsin Legislature’s explicit command that absentee voting must be “carefully regulated” and absentee ballots cast outside of the Legislature’s authorized procedures “may not be counted”?

2. Whether this Court should declare the Wisconsin election unconstitutional and void under Article II and thus failed under 3 U.S.C. § 2 and allow the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint its electors?

3. Whether federal courts may rely on the doctrine of laches to avoid reviewing Electors Clause or Equal Protection claims arising after absentee balloting began or which could not have reasonably been brought before absentee balloting commenced?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-883/165018/20201230144119028_20-___PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

From the Wisconsin Legislature January 4, 2021.

2021 ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3

January 4, 2021 – Introduced by Representative Allen.

***AUTHORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE***

Relating to: addressing election law violations.
Whereas, in the United States, the power to govern is given by the people
through the process of democratic elections. It is by this process that our government obtains legitimacy; and
Whereas, we have three branches of government, and the legislative branch,
consisting of duly elected representatives of the people, is the branch charged with the power to write the laws. It is through this process that our government maintains legitimacy; and
Whereas, when the executive branch or administrative agencies charged with
enforcing the laws instead choose to step outside of the law, or go beyond the law, or stretch the law to something other than what is written, the legitimacy of the government begins to erode; and
Whereas, the 2020 election and the recount of the results of the presidential
election have brought to light a number of areas in which the letter of the law is not being followed. Those circumstances of departure from the letter of the law include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Clerks provided absentee ballots to electors without applications, as
required by Wis. Stat. § 6.86.
2. Clerks and deputy clerks authorized by the municipal clerk failed to write
on the official ballot, in the space for official endorsement, the clerk’s initials and
official title, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
3. Clerks issued absentee ballots to electors who were required to enclose a copy
of proof of identification or an authorized substitute document, but who failed to do so under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
4. Clerks failed to enter initials on ballot envelopes indicating whether the
elector is exempt from providing proof of identification, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2).
5. Clerks in Milwaukee and Dane Counties declared electors in their counties
to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86 (2), causing chaos and confusion, and failed to keep current the mailing list established under that subsection; more than 215,000 electors thus avoided identification requirements and safeguards that the legislature has established.
6. Clerks and the boards of canvassers permitted absentee ballots returned
without the required witness address under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2) to be counted in
contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6d).
7. Clerks who received absentee ballots with improperly completed certificates
or no certificates filled in missing information in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (9).

8. The Wisconsin Elections Commission, in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.875,
barred special voting deputies from entering qualified nursing homes and assisted living facilities, instead mailing ballots to residents directly, thereby avoiding safeguards the legislature put in place to protect our most vulnerable citizens and loved ones.
9. The clerk of the City of Madison ignored Wis. Stat. § 6.855 and created an
event named “Democracy in the Park” and, of her own accord, designated alternate sites where absentee ballots could be collected; these ballots were counted in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6); and
Whereas, without legitimacy, the government of the people, by the people, and
for the people shall not stand. Instead, our government will devolve into a system of coercion and bribery that seeks to use the guise of elections to hold a degree of credibility; and
Whereas, the people of Wisconsin are demanding that the legislature address
questions of legitimacy; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the assembly, That: the Wisconsin State Assembly recognizes
that the most important function for a government is to conduct fair and honest
elections that follow the duly enacted law; and, be it further
Resolved, That when there are significant portions of the population that
question the integrity of the elections due to the failure of election officials to follow the letter of the law, it is incumbent upon the legislature to address the issues that are in question; and, be it further
Resolved, That the members of the Wisconsin State Assembly place the
redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures as its highest priority and shall take up legislation crafted to ensure civil officers follow the laws as written.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/05/wisconsin-legislature-2021-assembly-resolution-3-introduced-january-4-2021-redress-to-these-and-other-election-law-violations-and-failed-administrative-procedures/

More here:

1 Comment

Tagged "did count, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots", Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5

Posted in Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Sidney Powell: “There is enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

Posted on March 1, 2021 | 2 comments

Sidney Powell: “enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

Massive Election Fraud

From GateWay Pundit

“Sidney Powell LIVE: “There Is More than Enough Evidence in the Public Now to More than Reverse the Election in at Least 5 States” “

“Sidney Powell had this to say to open the conversation. “Well, Erskine from my perspective it looks like the complete breakdown of every institution of law enforcement and the rule of law that we have trusted in this country since its inception to protect the law and the citizens from abuses by the government.

As far as the last election Sidney Powell had this to say, “There’s all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well… Fractionalized votes. That’s exactly what we have here from a computer algorithm that we can prove in multiple counties and it could prove across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines. The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know. Federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months… In this case it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots. We already know that’s not going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, “Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.” Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine you’re going to get the same result.

Sidney then dropped this bomb, “There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/sidney-powell-live-enough-evidence-public-now-reverse-election-least-5-states-video/

Dump

Twitter

More here:

Tagged "Dominion... not allowing inspection of the voting machines", "massive election fraud", Sidney Powell: “There is enough evidence ..... to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Watch President Trump live at CPAC Sunday February 28 2021 3:40 PM ET, Right Side Broadcasting Network coverage of all of the main speakers

Posted on February 28, 2021 | 4 comments

Watch President Trump live at CPAC Sunday February 28 2021 3:40 PM ET, Right Side Broadcasting Network coverage of all of the main speakers

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

Sunday

Former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Former Ark. Gov. Mike Huckabee

Former National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow

Former President Trump

Trump, at CPAC, expected to hammer Biden on immigration, China

“Former President Donald Trump will hammer President Biden on everything from immigration to China when he addresses the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) on Sunday, sources familiar with the speech told Fox News.

Meanwhile, Trump is expected to fall just short of announcing a 2024 presidential bid. The sources said he will go between “warming up to the idea of a 2024 run, and walking right up to the line of announcing another campaign” — though he is not expected to make an actual announcement.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-cpac-biden-immigration-china

Dump

Twitter

More here: