Category Archives: Secretary of State

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

You could not ask for better witnesses and evidence for election fraud lawsuits.

The following were selected for their backgrounds, expertise and the fact that they personally observed probable fraud and certain irregularities.

Michigan.

Only one is listed because this witness was an Assistant Attorney General for Michigan for 8 years!

Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

“87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Georgia.

Harri Hursti:

Poll Observer. “My background and qualifications in voting system cybersecurity are set forth in my December 16, 2019 declaration. ”    “I am also an expert in ballot scanning because of extensive background in digital imaging prior by work researching election systems.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.4.pdf

Susan Voyles:

Poll Manager.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.16.pdf

Mayra Romera:

Florida Bar licensed paralegal.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf

Nicholas J. Zeher:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.15.pdf

 Ibrahim Reyes:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.17.pdf

Carlos E. Silva:

Florida trial lawyer for over 26 years.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.19.pdf

Kevin P. Peterford:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.22.pdf

It’s almost like they expected widespread fraud.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the

Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough

Filed November 27, 2020

Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.

Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.

As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.

Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.

The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/486132522/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-in-Pennsylvania-by-Judge-McCullough-Election-Likely-Unconstitutional#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Michigan election statutes:

168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.

(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.

168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.

remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,

It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”

Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”

Read more:

https://www.oann.com/mich-ag-nessel-threatens-journalist-over-detroit-leaks/

Big League Poliitics had been covering election fraud in Detroit and Michigan.

“Big League Politics has been reporting about imminent electoral concerns in the city of Detroit for weeks now, starting with our #DetroitLeaks series and then continuing by reporting from the absentee ballot counting board at the TCF Center in Detroit on election night.”

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/republican-poll-challengers-speak-out-on-what-they-saw-at-detroits-absentee-voter-counting-board/

The #DetroitLeaks series has apparently been scrubbed.

Was this because of the threat from AG Nessel?

This video is still up on Youtube.

Is the video authentic?

Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.

The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

Compare the following to revelations in the video:

“13. There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in
collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll watchers and activists.First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:

A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all
Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;
B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view
ballot handling, processing, or counting and locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots we reprocessed;
C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;
D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored
Democratic poll watchers;
E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined
herein;                                                                                                                                    F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without
allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;
G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote;
H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered
Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and
I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit
employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory
behavior.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

The complaint is loaded with fraud allegations from numerous credible witnesses.

You are urged to read it.

Real ballots should be counted and invalid ones thrown out.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel should be thrown out too and prosecuted.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

Pennsylvania.

From the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee.

Public Hearing on Election Issues

November 25, 2020.

Rudy Giuliani: “You sent out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1,823,148 absentee or mail-in ballots. You received back 1.4 million approximately. However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million. I don’t know what accounts for the 700,000 difference between the ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count,”

Are the excess ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

Georgia.

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An
Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:

14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.

15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.

16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”

“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”

Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit.

John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al

Filed November 25, 2020.

“The Contestant John Wood, as an aggrieved elector, brings this lawsuit against
the Defendants because state and local election administration officials have ignored statutes, interposed their own solutions for ballot security, accepted private money that casts doubt on election integrity and so mismanaged
the election process that no one can have faith that one of their most sacred rights under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, voting,
is being protected. Within the State of Georgia, private non—
profits, state officials and local elected officials acted to systematically eviscerate Georgia’s Election Law contrary to Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia—failing to protect election integrity. Investigations have uncovered more than $350 million distributed nationwide —$6.3 million of which went to Fulton County, Georgia—and funneled through collection of non—profit organizations dictating to election officials how to manage the election.

In particular, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) granted $6.3 million USD to Fulton County, Georgia. These unregulated private funds were predominantly used to:

(1) pay “ballot harvesters”;
(2) provide mobile ballot pick up units;
(3) deputize and pay political activists to manage ballots;
(4) pay election judges and poll workers;
(5) establish drop—boxes and satellite offices;
(6) pay local election officials and agents to recruit cities recognized as democratic strongholds to recruit other cities to apply for grants
from non—profits;
(7) consolidate counting centers in the urban core to facilitate the movement of hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots in secrecy without
legally required bi-partisan observation;
(8) initiate and implement two—tier ballot “curing” plan that illegally
counted ballots in Democrat strongholds and spoil similarly
situated ballots in Republican strongholds; and
(9) pay for and help design the plan to remove the poll watchers from one political party so that the critical responsibility of determining
the validity of the ballot and the validity of the count could be conducted without oversight.”

Read more:

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020CV342959-PETITION.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” “

Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” ”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From the Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit.

1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the 2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the affidavits of expert witnesses.

2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.

3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.

Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation

4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al, Nov 25, 2020, 96600 absentee requested counted but never recorded as returned

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger rushed through the purchase of
Dominion voting machines and software in 2019 for the 2020 Presidential
Election4. A certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated. (See attached hereto Exh. 5, copy
Certification for Dominion Voting Systems from Secretary of State).
Similarly a test report is signed by Michael Walker as Project Manager but is
also undated. (See Exh. 6, Test Report for Dominion Voting Systems,
Democracy Suite 5-4-A)

Defendants Kemp and Raffensperger disregarded all the concerns that
caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of Elections in
2018, namely that it was vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable
manipulation. An industry expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of
Computer Science and Election Security Expert has recently observed, with
reference to Dominion Voting machines: “I figured out how to make a slightly
different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches
some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer
program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you just need
7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver.” (Attached hereto Exh. 7, Study,
Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters by
Andrew W. Appel Princeton University, Richard A. DeMillo, Georgia Tech
Philip B. Stark, for the Univ. of California, Berkeley, December 27, 2019).5

As explained and demonstrated in the accompanying redacted
declaration of a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military
Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic
intelligence, the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf
of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the
most recent US general election in 2020. This Declaration further includes a
copy of the patent records for Dominion Systems in which Eric Coomer is
listed as the first of the inventors of Dominion Voting Systems. (See
Attached hereto as Exh. 8, copy of redacted witness affidavit, 17 pages,
November 23, 2020).

Expert Navid Keshavarez-Nia explains that US intelligence services
had developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion.
He states that Dominion’s software is vulnerable to data manipulation by
unauthorized means and permitted election data to be altered in all
battleground states. He concludes that hundreds of thousands of votes that
were cast for President Trump in the 2020 general election were transferred
to former Vice-President Biden. (Exh. 26).

Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records
demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and
counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards
by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See
Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.).

The Dominion system used in Georgia erodes and undermines the
reconciliation of the number of voters and the number of ballots cast, such
that these figures are permitted to be unreconciled, opening the door to ballot
stuffing and fraud. The collapse of reconciliation was seen in Georgia’s
primary and runoff elections this year, and in the November election, where
it was discovered during the hand audit that 3,300 votes were found on
memory sticks that were not uploaded on election night, plus in Floyd county,
another 2,600 absentee ballots had not been scanned. These “found votes”
reduced Biden’s lead over Donald Trump6.”

“Georgia’s election officials and poll workers exacerbated and helped,
whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Dominion system carry out massive
voter manipulation by refusing to observe statutory safeguards for absentee
ballots. Election officials failed to verify signatures and check security
envelopes. They barred challengers from observing the count, which also
facilitated the fraud.”

Read more:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Jesse Law et al v Judith Whitmer et al Trump Nevada lawsuit hearing Dec 3, 15 depositions allowed, Declare Trump the Winner or Not Certify the votes

Jesse Law et al v Judith Whitmer et al Trump Nevada lawsuit hearing Dec 3, 15 depositions allowed, Declare Trump the Winner or Not Certify the votes

“Since early voting started, there have been credible reports that voting machines in Clark County, Nevada are automatically checking Harry Reid’s name on the ballot”…GateWay Pundit 2010

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

 

From Gateway Pundit November 25, 2020.

“HUGE: Trump Campaign Nevada Lawsuit Challenging Election Results Given Go Ahead for Depositions, Hearing Set for December 3

A Trump campaign lawsuit in Nevada filed last week challenging the election results has been given the go ahead for depositions by the Carson City court where the case was filed November 17. The suit seeks to have Trump declared the winner or that no electors be awarded due to fraud and irregularities. A hearing was set for December 3rd. Fifteen depositions each by the opposing parties, the Trump electors and Biden electors, are due by the hearing date.

Politico’s Josh Gerstein posted Tuesday night, “JUST IN: Carson City, NV judge hearing election challenge filed by Trump electors has set a hearing for 12/3 at 130PM local. Will allow 15 depositions for each side between now and then. Atty is @SidneyPowell1’s co-counsel in Flynn case, @jbinnall…Binnall said part of the challenge is over the use of Agilis scanner and signature matcher. ‘It is important, for sure, but is far from the main meat of our challenge,” he said…We could see fight over secrecy relating to witnesses. Binnall said he wants a protective order b/c of threats, but idea that a presidential election challenge will be resolved based on secret testimony seems highly implausible. List of challenger witnesses due by 5PM local tomw””

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-trump-campaign-nevada-lawsuit-challenging-election-results-given-go-ahead-depositions-hearing-set-december-3/

From Citizen Wells November 18, 2020.

“Trump Team Asks NV Courts to Declare Trump the Winner or Not Certify the State’s Vote for POTUS

The Trump campaign on Tuesday announced a new lawsuit in Nevada over the Agilis ballot processing and signature scanning machine that was used throughout the state. There are also allegations of observers being denied access to watch the ballot duplication process and the use of some outreach programs geared towards Native Americans that allegedly resulted in vote-buying.

According to the campaign, at least 40,000 votes were impacted, although that number could be higher.

Clark County register Joe Garcia acknowledged known problems with the voting tabulation system but said it couldn’t be remedied with a recount, the lawsuit stated.”

Read more;

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/18/trump-nevada-lawsuit-electors-jesse-law-et-al-v-judith-whitmer-et-al-nov-17-2020-the-reliability-of-signature-verification-machines-has-not-been-established/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

PA blocked from certifying votes Nov 25 2020, Judge Patricia McCullough, The Honorable Mike Kelly et al v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

PA blocked from certifying votes Nov 25 2020, Judge Patricia McCullough, The Honorable Mike Kelly et al v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

 

From the Order signed November 25, 2020.

“The Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean :
Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy :
Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin :
Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda :
Logan, :
Petitioners :
:
v. : No. 620 M.D. 2020
:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :
Pennsylvania General Assembly, :
Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, :
Kathy Boockvar, :
Respondents :

ORDER
NOW
Emergency/Special Prohibitory Injunction (Emergency Motion), the subsequent
filings by the parties,
Application for Emergency Relief filed at 11:42 p.m. on November 24, 2020
(Supplemental Emergency Application), it is hereby preliminarily ordered and
decreed as follows:
1. As to the Supplemental Emergency Application, to the extent that there
remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results of the
2020 General Election (the “Election”) for the office of President and Vice
President of the United States of America, Respondents are preliminarily
enjoined from doing so, pending an evidentiary hearing to be held on
Friday, November 27, 2020 at 11:30 am via WebEx.
2. As to the Emergency Motion, filed on November 22, 2020, inasmuch as
Respondents, based on their Press Release and briefs, have not undertaken
certification of any of the other results of the Election, Respondents are
preliminarily enjoined from certifying the remaining results of the Election,
pending the evidentiary hearing on Friday, November 27, 2020 at 11:30
am via WebEx.
3. Respondents shall file and serve an Answer and Memorandum of Law in
opposition to the Supplemental Emergency Application by 3:00 p.m.
TODAY, November 25, 2020.
4. A scheduling order concerning the evidentiary hearing will follow.

/s/ Patricia A. McCullough
PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge”

https://www.scribd.com/document/485797248/620-MD-2020-Order-Nov-25

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Amistad Project Donald Trump v Wisconsin Election Commission et al Emergency Petition for original action, Wisconsin Supreme Court Nov 23, 2020

Amistad Project Donald Trump v Wisconsin Election Commission et al Emergency Petition for original action, Wisconsin Supreme Court Nov 23, 2020

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

 

156,807 illegal votes discovered.

“Conclusion.

This court should grant the Emergency Petition for original action and grant the relief sought because the Wisconsin election officials violated Wisconsin’s election laws in a material way which nullified a close Presidential race in Wisconsin.”

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Trump-v-WEC-Petition-1.pdf

From Citizen Wells November 8, 2020.

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question

From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/08/wisconsin-election-breaking-news-300-am-november-8-2020-illegal-procedure-allowed-clerks-to-cure-spoiled-ballots-state-law-invalidates-any-ballot-without-a-witness-address/

From Citizen Wells November 19, 2020.

“Rudy Giuliani just spoke at the President Trump legal team press conference 12:00 today, November 19, 2020.

He spoke about their efforts in Wisconsin and the 2 counties they are concentrating their efforts on, Dane and Milwaukee.

He began by revealing that WI law is very strict about mail in votes.

Absentee ballots must be requested.

He then stated that absentee ballots in those 2 counties far exceeded the number requested.

That explains the high voter participation rate in Wisconsin and in Dane County.

Dane county had a 88% rate. Considered high anywhere.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/19/dane-county-wisconsin-88-voter-participation-rate-explanation-from-rudy-giuliani-trump-legal-team-press-conference-more-absentee-ballots-than-requested/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/