Category Archives: Citizen News

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

An Arizona judge has just ruled in favor of the senate.

The ballots may now be accessed for a real audit.

Is the evidence on the voting machines still there?

Are the ballots intact?

From Citizen Wells February 23, 2021.

ARIZONA STATE SENATOR SONNY BORRELLI INTERVIEW

Three things stand out:

  1. Concerns about evidence tampering.
  2. Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
  3. The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/23/arizona-2020-election-update-feb-23-2021-senator-borrelli-interview-paul-boyer-close-friends-with-maricopa-board-evidence-on-the-machines-still-there-ward-v-jackson-denied/

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

 

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From Granite Grok February 26, 2021.

“Many across America and as far away as Australia (go to 12:07), are aware of the “Windham Incident” – NH’s blatant disregard for election integrity.

The disturbing debacle was created by Gov. Sununu, his Attorney General and Secretary of State (SOS) due to their lack of a meaningful investigation into the disturbing and questionable results produced by Windham’s voting machines.”

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.”  Those errors were for only one race.  We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste

 

Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From GateWay Pundit February 26, 2021

“After Public Pressure New Hampshire AG’s Office Rescinds Plan to Move Voting Machines to State Capitol for Investigation”

“In the lead-up to the planned House vote this week, the AGs office, in a surprise move Monday, notified the town of Windham of their intent to take possession of the 4 voting machines, owned by the town and its citizens, even before the legislative process had been completed.  The bill hasn’t passed and therefore is not even ready for signature by the Governor.  Why is the AG suddenly so anxious to take possession of these machines?  After the change in the scheduled vote and swift public outcry to this planned removal of the machines, the AGs office rescinded this notice yesterday.  

As this audit is being done to reassure the citizens of Windham that their machines indeed operated properly on Nov. 3rd and that their votes were counted accurately, it is felt by most involved that this Windham audit should be done in front of its citizens, not in the distant State capital of Concord.  It makes no sense to subject sensitive electronic machinery to needless transport in winter and then leave them unattended in Concord, rather than locked in a secure vault in the town, which has ownership of the devices.  In following with this sentiment, town officials indicated they would likely refuse to unlock the vault and allow this apparent confiscation of their machines.
To those advocating for this long-delayed investigation, it is clear the AGs office has lost the trust of the people to whom it is accountable, the citizens of not just Windham, but New Hampshire.  They have clearly demonstrated their office to be an unwilling participant in this audit process and disrespectful to the rights of the citizens.  SB43 is currently scheduled to be heard in the House Election Law Committee on March 5 at 10:30 am.  Concerned citizens of the State should contact Committee members to urge support for this bill.”
Read more:

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

 

Glenn Beck on Justice Thomas dissent and 2020 election, Beck is right about Thomas but no constitutional scholar, Thomas wrong on “seems to have affected too few ballots”

Glenn Beck on Justice Thomas dissent and 2020 election, Beck is right about Thomas but no constitutional scholar, Thomas wrong on “seems to have affected too few ballots”

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“I just warn you that we are in a spiritual battle against evil unleashed,”   “We are not fighting the Democrats — we are fighting Satan himself.”...Glenn Beck

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

The answer for over 200 years is in Marbury V Madison.

And Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas nailed it in his dissenting opinion in REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA V VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, et al.

“The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority
to determine the “Manner” of federal elections. Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2. Yet both before and after the 2020
election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it
upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we
received an unusually high number of petitions and emer-
gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions
here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legisla-
ture established an unambiguous deadline for receiving
mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days.                    The court also ordered officials to count ballots
received by the new deadline even if there was no evi-
dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed
by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to
have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any
federal election. But that may not be the case in the future.
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address
just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec-
tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.
The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to set-
tle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear
rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future
elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath
a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite
further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fel-
low citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respect-
fully dissent.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/22/justice-thomas-dissent-republican-party-of-pennsylvania-v-degraffenreid-sos-feb-22-2021-trump-writ-of-certiorari-denied-amicus-briefs-accepted/

Glenn Beck, on his show on February 23, 2021 rightfully heaped praise on Justice Thomas for his dissenting opinion and agreed that we must fix the issues plaguing the 2020 election before moving forward.

Beck proved he is no constitutional scholar with his mishandling of the Obama eligibility issues in 2008.

And he is wrong again.

He wants us to forget about the outcome of the 2020 election since we can do nothing about it.

That there is no provision in the constitution to remedy a revelation of sufficient wrongs.

Wrong!

If Biden was elected illegally, he can be removed.

For starters he can be impeached and removed.

That should be the last resort.

If he and Harris were not legally elected, they should be escorted from the White House with or without force.

Of course all of the participants in the charade must be prosecuted.

Justice Thomas error

I have the utmost respect for Justice Thomas.

I believe he is the most constitutionally grounded of all the justices.

However, in his statement:

“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election.”

I would replace it with “may or may not have affected”.

Justice Thomas was in no position to make that statement since the Supreme Court did not hear any evidence in the Pennsylvania case or in any other states such as Georgia or Wisconsin where election officials disregarded state laws.

Glenn Beck

Call me.

Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

New Hampshire Constitution

[Art.] 67. [Election of Secretary and Treasurer.] The Secretary and Treasurer shall be chosen by joint ballot of the Senators and Representatives assembled in one room.
June 2, 1784

https://www.nh.gov/glance/secretary.htm

From New Hampshire NPR December 2, 2020.

“Gardner Holds Onto Role As Nation’s Longest Serving Secretary of State

Wednesday marked another career milestone for New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who sailed without opposition into a 23rd term, upholding his position as the longest-serving Secretary of State in the nation.

The moment stood in sharp contrast to the start of Gardner’s most recent term, when he just barely fended off a challenge from former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Colin Van Ostern.”

Read more:

https://www.nhpr.org/post/gardner-holds-role-nations-longest-serving-secretary-state#stream/0

The New Hampshire legislature elects the Secretary of State.

And now the Attorney General and Secretary of State’s office want the Dominion Voting machines that are the subject of controversy in the “Windham Incident.”

From Granite Grok February 24, 2021

“BREAKING! NH AG & SOS to “Take Possession” of the “Windham Incident” VOTING MACHINES!”

“Windham’s high level of mistrust and consternation is warranted.  The AG’s office and SOS have been performing a Jedi Mind Trick for months. Now they are being FORCED to perform an audit – and they want control of the ballots and machines ahead of time.  The optics of that is horrible.  I’ve been told several Windham town officials are against relinquishing control as well – and I hope they stand strong.

The audit should be performed in Windham – and under Windham’s control – as suggested here.  According to multiple attorney’s opinions… NH laws already allow a town’s Selectmen to perform the test – WITHOUT APPROVAL of the AG or SOS:

RSA 33-A Defines the ballots as municipal documents that are owned by the town, and;

RSA 656:40 Authorizes towns to purchase and own voting machines and;

RSA 656:42 VIII. (c) (11) Authorizes the moderator to perform pre-election certification testing of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (a) The city or town clerk is the custodian of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (c) Authorizes the selectmen to designate and define the duties of election officials to prepare and test the machines prior to an election…

So what’s the problem.  Why is Windham being prevented by the AG and SOS from running their own test, on their own equipment, with their own ballots?  What am I missing?”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/breaking-nh-ag-sos-to-take-possession-of-the-windham-incident-voting-machines

So, what is this “Windham Incident” the “Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”?

“From the ever-vigilant folk at the Live Free or Die Report (on Facebook). They have a photo of a recount sheet for the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham. The original machine counted results were wrong for all 4 Republicans by almost exactly 300 votes.

Looking at the image, we see changes of 297, 299, 303, and 298.

That is very strange. That is a large number, large enough that a Republican who lost by 100 to 300 votes would not ask for a recount. Of course, no Republican asked for a recount. It was a Democrat looking for lost votes (24 of them) to perhaps flip one seat in that local election.

And look at what they found. Something, unexpected. Something we were not supposed to see?

St Laurent (d) lost 100 votes, and their Republican opponents all gained 300, plus or minus three votes.

It could be a machine error and unique to this town, but this is a troublesome event given speculation about fraud and Dominion machine counting hacks. And if it is an error what other errors occurred  (see, at the top of the ticket).”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/10/windham-new-hampshire-recount-finds-dominion-voting-machines-shorted-republicans-all-4-republicans-lost-approx-300-votes-town-recount-coming/

Consider this:

JOE BIDEN
52.7%

424,921

DONALD TRUMP
45.4%

365,654

Governor

CHRIS SUNUNU
65.2%

516,609

DAN FELTES
33.4%

264,639

See a problem?

New Hampshire, do not let the Democrat SOS get those machines!!!

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial, Justices concerns, “Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms”

Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial, Justices concerns, “Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

February 19

“ALL of the Justices on the Supreme Court are flawed. Many are political. Some are corrupt.

 

“No word from SCOTUS yet on whether they will allow the election cases to proceed.

 

February 22

“I know many have been waiting on me to comment about the actions (or inaction) by the U.S. Supreme Court today in the 2020 election cases.

I will not mince words, We The People who seek honest elections conducted under the rule of law lost. The enemy won.

Having spoken that truth, the Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms that the lawsuits pursued by Sidney Powell and me were based on legitimate issues of law. All accusations and proceedings seeking to penalize or “discipline” Sidney and me should be terminated as we raised important issues in those case recognized by Justice Thomas. I agree with his Dissent. His rationale in the Pennsylvania is directly on point with my Georgia case and Sidney’s cases in Michigan and Wisconsin.

But this legal battle is not about Sidney and me. It is about you and your right to rely on the rule of law, especially on the bedrock principle that we must have honest and legal elections.

I remain very concerned about the breakdown of the rule of law in our country.

I will not quit. As I have done in the past, so I will continue to do in the future. I will continued to exercise my right of free speech and my right to take lawful actions in courts and/or administrative proceedings to recognize and re-establish the rule of law in America.

Thank you for your support. Stay strong. Keep hope alive.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸
www.fightback.law”

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20489890/clarence-thomass-dissent.pdf

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board,  Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board,  Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

The people of Arizona and some of the legislators really care about how the 2020 election was conducted.

It is the opinion of Citizen Wells that the legislature is long on talk and shorter on action.

The plenary power of the Arizona legislature is absolute and exceeds that of any court.

Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli interview

Three things stand out:

  1. Concerns about evidence tampering.
  2. Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
  3. The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

Arizona GOP chairman stated that the Dominion machines had been recalibrated.

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al. was denied by SCOTUS February 22, 2021

No. 20-809

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.

from the Supreme Court of Arizona

Petition for a writ of certiorari denied.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Due process requires at a minimum the “orderly judicial review of any disputed matters that might arise” in an election. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 110
(2000). In this case, the lower courts allowed only two full days of inspection and discovery into the validity of the presidential election in Arizona, in which threemillion, three hundred thirty-three thousand, eight hundred twenty-nine
(3,333,829) ballots were cast. The lower court held an “accelerated evidentiary
hearing” due to what it perceived as deadlines in the Electoral Count Act, “[i]n order to permit this matter to be heard and appealed (if necessary) to the Arizona Supreme Court before the Electoral College meets on December 14, 2020.” (Exhibit “A,” Judgment.) As the Court stated to undersigned counsel at the initial hearing Nov. 30th hearing: “You may be right on the law, that we’ve got more time than I think we have, but I’m reluctant to take that chance. And certainly if I set an evidentiary hearing after the 14th of December, I would expect someone to special action me to the Supreme Court and have the Supreme Court tell me, no, we have to do it sooner. But by then they don’t move as quickly as we do and we’ve lost a few days. And so my inclination is to set it on Thursday [December 3rd]….” (See Appendix “F,” transcript of initial Nov. 30th hearing, p. 14, lines 16-23.) As a result, even a very limited inspection of twenty-five hundred ballots that was granted by the Court (and/or stipulated to by the parties) simply could not be finished in time for trial, and Petitioner’s requests for larger inspections (as detailed below) were denied. ”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-809.html

Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408

“The Arizona state Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 on a party-line 16-14 vote Thursday, giving the legislature the express authority to subpoena ballots, election equipment and information from counties. It also explicitly states that the legislature has the authority to investigate any matter.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, was passed  in the event that a judge ruled that the law doesn’t give the legislature the authority to subpoena ballots and tabulation machines from Maricopa County so it can conduct an audit of the November 2020 election.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/arizona-senate-passed-senate-bill-1408-subpoena-bill-feb-19-2021-legislature-has-the-authority-to-investigate-any-matter/

Az Canvassers are going door to door, documenting illegal voters. Listen to this canvasser’s story.

 

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Windham Incident: NH Senate voted 24 to 0 to perform audit due to Dominion voting machine scandal, House takes up this week, Town Hall meeting Feb 22

Windham Incident: NH Senate voted 24 to 0 to perform audit due to Dominion voting machine scandal, House takes up this week, Town Hall meeting Feb 22

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From Granite Grok

“The “Windham Incident” Selectman’s Meeting – Monday, Feb. 22 at 7p”

“Last week, the Senate passed an amendment to Senate Bill SB43 that was championed by Senator Bob Giuda.  The amendment replaced the entire text of SB43 with language that would FORCE the state to perform an audit on the Windham State Rep race on November 3, 2020.

It passed 24-0.  Let that sink in!  24-0!  That is quite a statement that reflects our desire to have accurate elections. The House will pick up the baton this week – and I’m hopeful that it flies through.

The Windham Board of Selectmen have been on board requesting an investigation regarding what the heck happened since the beginning of the debacle – and tomorrow they have an agenda item to discuss the situation further.

You can attend in person at Windham Town Hall, 3 North Lowell Rd, Windham 03087, or you can attend via Zoom (details below).

 

Town of Windham is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Board of Selectman Virtual Meeting

Time: Feb 22, 2021 07:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-selectmans-meeting-monday-feb-22-at-7p

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Alito Gorsuch DISSENTING OPINION

“JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant re-
view in these cases. They present an important and recur-
ring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Elec-
tors Clauses of the United States Constitution, Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2, are violated when a state court holds
that a state constitutional provision overrides a state stat-
ute governing the manner in which a federal election is to
be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts,*
and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.
In the cases now before us, a statute enacted by the Penn-
sylvania Legislature unequivocally requires that mailed
ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. Pa. Stat. Ann.,
Tit. 25, §§3146.6(c), 3150.16(c) (Purdon 2020). Neverthe-
less, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a provision of
the State Constitution mandating that elections “be free
and equal,” Art. I, §5, altered that deadline and ordered that                      mailed ballots be counted if received up to three days
after the election, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boock-
var, ___ Pa. ___, ___–___, 238 A. 3d 345, 362, 371–372
(2020). Both the state Republican and Democratic parties
urged us to grant review and decide this question before the
2020 election. See Application for Stay in Republican Party
of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 20A54, pp. 2–3; Demo-
cratic Party of Pennsylvania Response to Application for
Stay in No. 20A54, pp. 8–9. But the Court, by an evenly
divided vote, refused to do so. Nos. 20A53 and 20A54, ante,
p. ___ (THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ.,
noting dissents). That unfortunate decision virtually en-
sured that this important question could not be decided be-
fore the election. See No. 20–542, ante, p. ___ (statement of
ALITO, J., joined by THOMAS and GORSUCH, JJ.).
Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refus-
ing to decide the important question that these cases pose.
“The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on
state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make
rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a
state court could override the rules adopted by the legisla-
ture simply by claiming that a state constitutional provi-
sion gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules
it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.”
Ante, at 3; see also Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing
Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam). A decision in
these cases would not have any implications regarding the
2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials
were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the
statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20A84, ante, p. ___, we know that the State Supreme
Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election
for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would
provide invaluable guidance for future elections.”

“For these reasons, the cases now before us are not moot.
There is a “reasonable expectation” that the parties will
face the same question in the future, see Wisconsin Right to
Life, Inc., 551 U. S., at 463, and that the question will evade
future pre-election review, just as it did in these cases.
These cases call out for review, and I respectfully dissent
from the Court’s decision to deny certiorari.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

From the US Supreme Court February 22, 2021.

CERTIORARI DENIED

20-799     WOOD, L. LIN V. RAFFENSPERGER, BRAD, ET AL.

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

From Citizen Wells February 19, 2021.

“Will Lin Wood’s accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?”

“From Lin Wood’s recent affidavit filed in US District Court:

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”

“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.””

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/