Category Archives: U.S. Supreme Court

Ann Dunham Obama, Seattle, WA, Obama birth, passport files, CIA, Manchurian Candidate, British citizenship

Posted on May 11, 2009 | 8 comments

A thought provoking article from the Lame Cherry blog, May 9, 2009.

“Seattle Ann Dunham”

AnnDunhamSeattle

“Something needs to be explained in the birth of Barack Hussein Obama jr. in that if the records were simply there for the dropping out of the sky, the records would be public, or, like in the case of the group which data mined Barack Obama’s passport files, and that individual started cooperating with authorities, he would be found dead as he was outside his Church with bullet holes in him.

If there was evidence which did exist, it is now sitting in the archive files of the cartels which run this world as the blackmail puppet strings to keep Birdie Obama in line.
Of course, Obama is so Mugabe Marxist that he makes Karl Marx look like George Washington.”

 

“That is why this blog noted the arena which Obama was vulnerable in was his passport files and his student loans, because that is where one person died already and where Obama has spent almost a million dollars in legal fees hiding the evidence there.”

“The tale of Washington state is the evidence which no one has really reviewed as it shows information and the most bizarre of circumstances.
We know for a fact that a friend at Mercer Island, Washington, stated Stanley arrived on the Island in August 1961. Arrived means she was travelling from some location. Airlines do indeed have records of flights, so if she was flying from Africa, Pan Am would have that data. Those records are stored in Florida.
My attempt to have someone in the archive search those records was met with as much silence as the Pakistani government reviewing their Barack Soetero records.”

“A key understanding in Washington is not long after Birdie was born, the fake address of residence in Hawaii was not the Obama residence. In fact, in 1961, while she was supposed to be married to Barack sr. she was in fact living at an apartment in Seattle at 516 13th Avenue E, Capitol Hill.
There she was going under the name Mrs. Anna Obama as an alias. She also at this time enrolled at the University of Washington.”

“As this blog has pointed out, Stanley Ann apparently tried a last ditch effort to make something of her wayward, drugged out son, Barry in what would be termed an intervention. It seems to be based upon the CIA studies to create Manchurian type candidates and why Obama is so phobic about the terrorists held in captivity at Gitmo, in releasing them.”

“So that is the continuing tale of Stanley and Birdie Obama. If the evidence was there, it is no doubt now laundered, and those who have seen it, have died from lead poisoning. It is an unsafe venture for people to delve into as the cartels are not about to allow this to upset the Obama boat.
By their actions, their concerns are the college and passport records and not the birth records any longer.

This is why I advocated certain London or American lawyers file cases based upon British Law due to Breyer and Ginsburg incorporating foreign law into American Law to test the standard as these cases would have standing in answering the question, which laws does Barack Obama have to follow first, American Constitutional Law or British Commonwealth Law, as he was born British and is British Indonesian currently.”

Read the entire article:

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/05/ghost-of-stanley-ann-duham-obama.html

8 Comments

Posted in Ann Dunham, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Birth Certificate, Citizens for the truth about Obama, COLB, drugs, Election, Election 2008, Election Law, FBI, Government, Hawaii, indictment, Indonesia, Kenya, Madelyn Dunham, Manchurian Candidate, Marxist, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, passport, Politics, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Obama, Supreme Court nomination, Judges, extreme liberal judge, Barack Obama statements, Youtube video recording, US Senate approval, examination of a judge’s philosophy, ideology and record, out of the mainstream rejected

Posted on May 5, 2009 | 6 comments

This was posted by commenter LM on this blog:
“Stop Obama From Nominating a LIBERAL Supreme Court Justice

As you have probably heard by now, Supreme Court Associate Justice David Souter has announced that he is retiring from the Court. And, as you would expect, President Barack Obama is already considering several extreme liberals to replace him.

But that doesn’t mean Obama will GET his choice of an extreme liberal judge — we CAN stop him!

HELP US STOP BARACK OBAMA FROM NOMINATING AN
EXTREME LIBERAL TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT:
SELECT HERE NOW TO FAX THE SENATE!

How can we stop a radical left-wing nominee from being approved by the U.S. Senate? Simple: By using President Obama’s own words against any such nominee, delivered directly to the ears of each and every Senator!

On January 31, 2006, then-Senator Barack Obama sent out a detailed, in-depth podcast about President Bush’s nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. (You can hear it in full here.)

In this recording, Barack Obama made the following statements: “There are some who believe that the President, having won the election, should have complete authority to appoint his nominee, and that the Senate should only examine whether or not the judge is intellectually capable… I DISAGREE WITH THIS VIEW… meaningful advice and consent includes an examination of a judge’s philosophy, ideology and record.”

President Barack Obama HIMSELF said that Senators should do MORE than just “pass on through” any judicial nominee that a President sends for confirmation. And, if that nominee is deemed to be “out of the mainstream” of “average America,” Obama declared that such a nominee should be rejected.

THAT is what we need to tell EVERY SINGLE U.S. SENATOR — that the American people do NOT want any Supreme Court nominee to be approved who stands for ANY radical, left-wing agenda!

So what do the potential nominees look like — the ones who are being put forth right now as the most likely to be picked by Barack Obama for a seat on the highest court in the land?

Simply put: they are all radical leftists who stand outside of the mainstream of average America!
Incoming solicitor general Elena Kagan, formerly the dean of the Harvard Law School, prohibited the military from recruiting on campus for a year. She has vigorously opposed the de-funding of taxpayer-funded clinics that promote abortions, despite the fact that a majority of Americans do NOT want their tax dollars to fund abortion providers.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals judge Diane Wood ruled AGAINST bans on partial-birth abortion in cases involving legislation from Wisconsin and Illinois.
Sonia Sotomayor, a Hispanic judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, who stated on a panel at Duke University Law School in 2005 that it is JUDGES who make policy, not legislators. And in a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she said she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their “experiences as women and people of color” in their decision-making, which she believes should “affect our decisions.”
Cass Sunstein, a law professor friend of the president and his current nominee to be head of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has been an outspoken proponent of tough restriction on gun sales and ownership, a ban on hunting, animal rights and what has been characterized as a “Fairness Doctrine” for the Internet.
Hillary Clinton. Need I say more?
Remember, Barack Obama has spoken out in terms of “redistributive justice” (”spread the wealth”) and considered it a shame that the Warren Court, which is the most liberal court in American history, did not engage in wealth redistribution! He likely thinks that he now has a “green light” to begin reshaping the federal judiciary to reflect his own far-left beliefs. Based on his recent appointments to the Justice Department, President Obama will probably name a Supreme Court nominee who will embrace an extremely liberal judicial philosophy — UNLESS we can intervene in the Senate BEFORE that happens!

We CAN stop Barack Obama from getting his choice of an extreme liberal judge passed easily through the U.S. Senate. But it’s going to take HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of messages, POURING into all of these Senators’ offices, to ensure we AT LEAST end up with a more “moderate” justice to replace Souter. IF WE DON’T DO THIS… here’s what we are looking at in the near future (courtesy of the Committee for Justice):
Top Ten Things to Expect from an Obama Supreme Court:
#10 expanding and perpetuating the use of racial preferences
#9 creating new constitutional rights to physician-assisted suicide and human cloning
#8 expanding judicial oversight of military detentions and CIA interrogations
#7 prohibiting tuition vouchers for religious schools
#6 banning the death penalty
#5 requiring taxpayers to fund essentially unlimited abortion rights
#4 creating new constitutional rights to massive government welfare and medical care programs
#3 stripping “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance
#2 eroding property rights
#1 ordering all 50 states to bless gay marriage
This is a LIVING NIGHTMARE that we CAN avoid — IF we take action RIGHT NOW! Americans across the country need to DEMAND that the Senate apply the same scrutiny for Obama’s appointees as Bush’s appointees — and to take Obama’s own words to heart, that “meaningful advice and consent includes an examination of a judge’s philosophy, ideology and record.”

Together, WE CAN STOP A RADICAL LIBERAL NOMINEE FROM BEING CONFIRMED! Take action today!

Sincerely,

Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation

P.S. In explaining his vote against Chief Justice John Roberts’ nomination, Obama stated that deciding the “truly difficult” cases requires resort to “one’s deepest values, one’s core concerns, one’s broader perspectives on how the world works, and the depth and breadth of one’s empathy.” In short, “the critical ingredient is supplied by what is in the judge’s heart.”

Translation: lawless judicial activism.

Appointing a radical leftist to the Court — someone who believes social activism trumps the Constitution, like all of the top candidates so far believe — could forever change what our country looks like. We CANNOT let that happen — let’s take action NOW! We need to let every U.S. Senator know that we will NOT sit idly by while a radical nominee “sails through” the Senate!

United States Justice Foundation
PO Box 131637
Dept Code 2342
Houston, TX 77219-1637″

https://secure.conservativedonations.com/usjf_souter/?a=2342

6 Comments

Posted in Announcements, Barack Obama, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Election, Election 2008, Federal Court, Government, Judges, Justice, Justice David Souter, Obama impeachment, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Politics, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Senate, video, YouTube

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Philip Berg, Orly Taitz, Lisa Liberi, Lisa Ostella, accusations, controversy

Posted on May 4, 2009 | 63 comments

From an email from MommaE of blog radio:

“Hi CitizenWells,
 
Below is a post that was in defense of Phil Berg’s Assistant Lisa Liberi!  THANK GOD some one had the foresight to go and research and post it.  Please feel free to post this on any and all Blogs or Web Sites you have or connected to.  Maybe this will stop some of the craziness that Phil and Lisa are going through since Orly’s attack.
 
MommaE”

“Comment: It never fails to amaze me how people will run with the slightest bit of uncorroborated information as if it were the God’s honest truth. Take for example the Lisa Liberi/Ostella issue. I looked Ms. Liberi up in the San Bernardino Court records. Unless this woman is a shape shifter, there is no way the California Liberi and the Pennsylvania Liberi are the same woman.

Yes, there is a Lisa Liberi in California who is originally from New Mexico and has a history of felony fraud. However, she resides in California, has been here for over a decade, and the only reason she shows up as a resident of New Mexico is because she is still on probation in that state. This is a matter of public record and is available (free) online. She was in custody in the State of California at the same time that the Pennsylvania Liberi was working as Berg’s assistant.

Now, I’ve heard of liberal “work release” programs, but the State of California did not allow an incarcerated felon to skip off to go work for Phil Berg.

The fact that two people have the same name does not offer any proof that they are the same person. It’s a huge jump in logic, with no verifiable documentation, that is being stated by some as FACT.

How these very same people have managed to fabricate a connection between Lisa Liberi and Lisa Ostella is even more mind boggling. The only substantiated connection is that these two women share the same first name.”

63 Comments

Posted in Berg, Blog Talk Radio, Dr. Orly Taitz, FBI, Federal Court, indictment, Judges, Obama records, Obama thugs, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Supreme Court, Talk Radio, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution

Tagged , , , , ,

Orly Taitz, Update, April 13, 2009, Dr. Taitz new website, Defend our Freedoms, San Antonio TX tea party, FBI, Citizens Grand Jury

Posted on April 13, 2009 | 31 comments

I just got off the phone with Dr. Orly Taitz. We spoke for a while about her website and the recent controversy. Dr. Taitz has a new website for Defend Our Freedoms.

http://repubx.com/

Orly stated that Defend our Freedoms is her foundation and that she has been blocked from accessing her data on the previous website. She is still committed to the cause of exposing the truth about Barack Obama.

We also spoke about the US Supreme Court, Justice Scalia, Chief Justice Roberts and law clerk Danny Bickell. She and I are both concerned that Bickell is still employed at the Supreme Court after all of the shady dealings that she and other attorneys experienced from Danny Bickell.

Dr. Orly Taitz will attend the San Antonio, TX tea party and stated she will be willing to stay an extra day if enough citizens are willing to meet with the local FBI office and initiate a Citizens Grand Jury. She also stated that her expenses are very high. Every time that she travels she spends at least a thousand dollars. She is providing her services pro bono, so it is not asking too much for people to donate to the cause to help with expenses.

Dr. Orly Taitz new site:

http://repubx.com/

God bless Orly Taitz

31 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, California, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Boards, Election Law, Electors, FBI, Federal Court, Government, Grand Jury, Grand Jury Indictment, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, John Roberts, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Lightfoot v. Bowen, Military officers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, Politics, Quo Warranto, Repubx.com, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Tea Party, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Army, US Constitution, US Military, US Soldier, voters, Washington DC

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Lyle J. Rapacki, PHD, FBI InfraGard, March 16, 2009, White Paper Discussion, Dr. Orly Taitz, Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, Barack Obama not eligible, US Attorney General, US Army Officer, constitutional crisis, civil unrest

Posted on March 25, 2009 | 561 comments

From Dr. Orly Taitz:

“NOTE from Defend Our Freedoms Foundation Staff.

The below report states: “if Mr Obama fights unsealing his documentation…there will be civil unrest unleashed on the streets”

InfraGrad has a Public Private Partnership with the FBI.  The PPP programs has been leveraged heavily from local to

international levels to render entities back into Panopolies. The term panopoly was coined by Joseph Borkin, chief

economic advisor of the Anti-trust Division of the Department of Justice circa 1943, during his investigations of

I.G. Farben because the aggregation of businesses were much larger than a monopoly or cartel.

 

 

LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.

Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment

Vice President of Protective Services

_______

 

Diplomate:                                                                                                                        Reply:

American Academy of Forensic Counselors                                                                              Southwest Risk Advisors, Inc.

American Psychotherapy Association                                                                                        Post Office Box 1595

                                                                                                                                                          Chandler, Arizona  85244

Licensed Investigator                                                                                                                    Telecommunications:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent                                                                              1-866-481-7712 – office

Information Warfare Analyst                                                                                                       480-440-5930 – cell

ASIS – Phoenix Chapter Membership Chair                                                                             LRapacki1@Hotmail.com                                                                       

FBI InfraGard –  Arizona                                                                                                               

 

 

Memorandum:  WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED

 

PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION              PI: 126:09

NOT CLASSIFIED — PUBLIC DISSEMINATION

 

March the 16th, 2009

 

Statement of Purpose:

The content of this White Paper is deliberately intended to stimulate thought and discussion.  Informational analysis comprising global security, national security of the United States of America, socio-political-economic forces as a dimension to national security, culture, freedom in human rights, defense and the rule of law are considered within the framework of this treatise.

 

Overview:

Beginning as campaign rhetoric, the question of Barak Obama’s legal status as a citizen of the United States of America qualified to serve as President, is moving toward a crescendo that might be heard formally by the United States Supreme Court.  Downplayed by many, including U.S. Senators on the Republican side and even Senators serving on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee as late as Friday of last week, a significant meeting occurred last Thursday, March 12th in Idaho.  The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court was speaking before a large audience (800 in attendance, including the President of the Idaho State Bar Association) on the character of Abraham Lincoln, when attorney Orly Taitz of Mission Viejo, California came to the microphone and asked the Chief Justice if he would personally review a legal brief and a complaint signed by over 325,000 American citizens as to the Constitutionality of Barak Obama’s swearing-in as President.  Chief Justice Roberts personally agreed to review the legal brief and the complaint saying such in front of the audience. 

_______

 

Motions to be heard on this critical Constitutional matter have been dismissed already, or not even accepted by courts in many states – New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Washington, Texas, North Carolina to name a few. But the issue will not go away; it is morphing now to include active members of the Armed Forces serving in “Hot Zones” or theatres of combat.  The legal motion handed

WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED

PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION              PI: 126:09

March the 16th, 2009

Continued – page two

_______

 

to the Chief Justice warns: “If MR. OBAMA is not constitutionally eligible to serve as President of the United States, then no act that he takes is, arguably, valid, the laws that he signs would not be valid, the protective orders that he signs would be null and void, and every act that he takes would be subject to legal challenge, both in the Courts of the United States of America, and in International Courts, and that, therefore, it is important for the voters to know whether he, or any candidate for President in the future, is eligible to serve in that office.”      

 

Just prior to this meeting, attorney Taitz sent Certified Correspondence on February 27th to the U.S. Attorney General, the Director of the FBI, Congressional and Senatorial Judiciary Committee, et.al. with the stated purpose “demand for investigation and immediate action in regards suspected crimes” identified as, but not limited to: impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation of character, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, forgery, using cyberspace for voter fraud.  Military officers from all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces have joined in this action as Plaintiffs.  Among the petitioners are:  Maj. Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr. David Earl-Graef; police officer and Selected Reservist Navy Commander Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, U.S. Army now serving on active duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. Timothy Comerford; Tenn. State Rep. Frank Nicely and others.

 

One of the “and others” is Harry Riley, a veteran who spent a significant time serving in the Pentagon.  This former officer said the issue is basically over whether Americans will allow “the trashing” of their Constitution.  “Myself, along with hundreds of thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S. Constitution.  The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis.  How can an individual become the Commander-in-Chief, or the president of the U.S., with questions regarding his constitutional qualifications?”

 

The complaint filed with the U.S. Attorney General (now in the hands of the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) requests “relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II to test his title to president before the Supreme Court.”  This legal phrase essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama is using to act as president.  This is the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.  This legal right established in British common law 800 years ago and was recognized by the U.S. Founding Fathers to demand documentation that may prove – or disprove – Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president. 

 

The complaint further states: “As president-elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009.  Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications.  Relators submit that as president elect, Respondent Obama failed to qualify per U.S. Constitution; articles II and I; amendment XX paragraph 3.”    

_______

 

What follows is the Summary of the complaint filed by Orly Taitz, attorney in Mission Viejo, California.  As you can imagine, the complaint is thorough and long.  I have replicated sufficient

WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED

PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION              PI: 126:09

March the 16th, 2009

Continued – page three

_______

 

passages so not to diminish the nature, spirit, scope or details of the complaint but conscious of time to read and length, I compiled the salient points in this complaint to save you from reading the 78 page document.  I will further attest that Exhibits and articles of proof were also attached to the documents I reviewed.  I will further attest the investigator working this case for attorney Taitz is a licensed Private Investigator in the State of California for the past twenty-five years, and prior to this, served twenty years as a Detective at New Scotland Yard.  I will further attest that I have reviewed documents containing additional names not previously mentioned. Some of the names are active military and others are retired at Lt. Col. and above rank.

 

Should it be discovered Mr. Obama is ineligible, a constitutional crisis would ensue attempting to determine which of his executive branch orders should be valid.  If, however, this case continues and Mr. Obama fights revealing his documentation, there are growing concerns of civil unrest, or worse, being unleashed in the streets of our nation.  The economic crisis coupled with this type of a constitutional crisis could prove to be a “flashpoint” that would test conventional law enforcement and elements of homeland security.

_______

 

Summary of the Complaint submitted to U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.:

“Recently an active U.S. Army Officer, who is risking his life in defending our country in Iraq, joined my (attorney Taitz) legal action aimed at unsealing Barack Hussein Obama’s, aka Barry Soetoro’s, (Obama/Soetoro) legal status and eligibility/legitimacy for presidency of the U.S.  The president needs to be a ‘natural born citizen – one who is born in the country to parents (plural, both) who are citizens of this country.

 

This definition was recently unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate in Senate resolution 511, presented by Senator Leahy in April 2008, as Senator McCain sought his legitimacy for the presidency to be verified, and Mr. McCain therefore presented his long version original birth certificate.

 

Mr. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen; he was a citizen of Kenya here in the U.S. on a student visa, which by itself made Obama/Soetoro ineligible for presidency, regardless of whether he was born in this country or Kenya, or whether he later lost his U.S. citizenship while immigrating to Indonesia and obtaining Indonesian citizenship (by being adopted and naturalized), and later reaffirming his Indonesian citizenship while traveling on a Indonesian passport as an adult, and also most likely obtaining taxpayer funded financial aid as a Foreign Exchange student from Indonesia (Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and any U.S. citizenship would therefore have to be relinquished).  Additionally, Obama/Soetoro’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, and the Ambassador from Kenya,

WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED

PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION               PI: 126:09

March the 16th, 2009

Continued – page three

_______

 

Peter Ogego, made statements that he was born in Kenya, and there is no record of him being born in any hospital in Hawaii.  HI Statute #338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth (COLB), and those can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only.

 

Additionally, Forensic Document expert Sandra Line has issued an affidavit that Obama’s place of birth cannot be ascertained without reviewing the original birth certificate.  Dr. Chiymoi Fukimo, director of Health Department for the State of Hawaii, issued a statement that Obama has a birth certificate on file, but intentionally refused to provide clarification, whether it is a birth certificate for a foreign born child of a Hawaiian resident, whether it was prepared based on hospital records or statement of one relative only, or whether it is an amended birth certificate, created upon Obama/Soetoro’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro, his Indonesian stepfather, and showing him a citizen of Indonesia. 

 

There are forensic questions raised about the short version Certification of Life Birth posted by Obama/Soetoro on his web site; lacking corroborating evidence such as name of the hospital, name of the doctor, three signatures and a seal on the front of the document.

 

Similarly, Obama/Soetoro supporters used Cyber space previously, in order to misinform and defraud American citizens and commit voter fraud.  On November 3rd, a day before the National elections, when numerous voters questioned Obama/Soetoro’s Natural Born status and his refusal to provide his long version birth certificate, an article appeared on the Internet stating that a Virginia Judge reviewed Obama/Soetoro’s original birth certificate and found it to be valid, Obama/Soetoro to be a Natural Born citizen, and all legal actions to be frivolous (Exhibit).  This whole case was manufactured, and Cyber space was used, to defraud American citizens….

 

I am also requesting an investigation into the financial dealings of Barack and Michele Obama.  Please see attached list of over 100 addresses for Barack Obama and a 100 business addresses for Michele Obama.  These are addresses obtained from a private investigator and an intelligence service.  Obama/Soetoro’s addresses are connected to numerous different social security numbers.  None of the 130 positions listed for Michelle and Barry or Barack H. Obama were listed on their disclosed tax returns.  There has to be a corresponding search for each and every employer that is listed.  If those are salaried positions then, there is massive tax fraud.  And if those were campaign contributions over the allowed limits then, there is massive campaign contributions fraud, especially in light of over $300 million in

 

WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED

PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION               PI: 126:09

March the 16th, 2009

Continued – page four

_______

 

contributions that are unaccounted for.  Which is it?  What social security numbers were used? 

 

As you stated in your speech on Martin Luther King Day, Americans should not be ‘cowards’, particularly when matters of race are concerned.  I was not a coward and prepared this large dossier, so I hope you will not be a coward and instead order an expeditious completion of this investigation and its subsequent prosecution.”

 

Conclusion:

Accompanying this complaint is a petition calling for an appointment of a special prosecutor similar to the one appointed during Watergate.  The fact that Obama has not ordered Hawaiian officials to release the document leaves doubt as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists.  Similar concerns exist in Mr. Obama’s refusal to release student records from Occidental College in the early 80’s where he may have been a student under the name of Barry Soetero, attending the college on aid for foreign students.

 

The action handed to the Chief Justice is on behalf 120 military officers, many of high rank, and 9 state representatives.  Purportedly the room was stunned and silent as attorney Taitz and Chief Justice Roberts engaged in an extremely brief exchange regarding these charges which led to the oral promise made by the Chief Justice to review them.    

 

 

 

( END OF REPORT )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.

Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent

Information Warfare Analyst

FBI InfraGard – Arizona

 

0100 Hrs. m.s.t.”

Read more:

http://defendourfreedoms.org

 

            

561 Comments

Posted in Announcements, Attorney General, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Birth Certificate, California, Chief Justice, Citizen, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Congress, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election update, FBI, Federal Court, Generals, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, John Roberts, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Military officers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Quo Warranto, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Military, US Soldier, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Chief Justice John Roberts, Orly Taitz, Dr Taitz confronts Justice Roberts, March 21, 2009, YouTube video, University of Idaho, Bellwood lecture, Obama not eligible, Barack Obama not natural born citizen

Posted on March 21, 2009 | 45 comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, the courageous immigrant from Russia,
the true American, can be seen and heard confronting
Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John Roberts,
at the conclusion of the Bellwood lecture at the
University of Idaho. Dr. Taitz is involved in multiple
lawsuits at the state and Supreme Court level that
state that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen
and is ineligible to be president. Orly Taitz has
enlisted numerous military officers and soldiers as
plaintiffs in her lawsuits.

Read more from Dr. Orly Taitz:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/

45 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, California, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Lightfoot v. Bowen, Military officers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Quo Warranto, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, video, voters, YouTube

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Orly Taitz interview, March 17, 2009, Rollye James interview, Obama’s Identity, Obama’s Money, Scotus Tampering, US Supreme Court, YouTube videos

Posted on March 20, 2009 | 36 comments

Rollye James interview of Dr. Orly Taitz
March 17, 2009
Orly Taitz intro

Obama’s Identity

Obama’s Money

Scotus Tampering I

Scotus Tampering II

Dr. Orly Taitz website:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/

36 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, California, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Federal Court, Globe Magazine, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, John Roberts, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Lightfoot v. Bowen, Military officers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, Obama thugs, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, press conference, Quo Warranto, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Military, US Soldier, voters, YouTube

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Natural Born Citizen, Leo Donofrio, Vattel, Obama not natural born citizen, Ron Paul, Citizen Wells, US Constitution, Founding fathers, Marbury vs Madison, Citizens, Natives, Natural born citizen video

Posted on March 19, 2009 | 15 comments

I received the following email request on December 26, 2008:

“XXXXX XXXXXX of TX has today gotten off the phone with Ron Paul.
Her parents live in the same city as RP.
 
Bad news.  He does NOT intend at this time to stand up on Jan
8th.  Part of the reason XXXXX mentioned was that RP said no
one knew the definition by either the law cases and Constitution
itself as to the real menaing of natural born.

Citizen Wells, I immediately thought of all your great research
on natural born that you’ve posted on our website.  Its too much
to expect RP or any Congress critter to read it all BUT…
Here’s you assignment.  Condense into no more than 3 pages with
full legal references on as many pages as needed.  The more the
RELEVANT references the better.   Can we have this done by Dec 28th?
 
I also ask that XXXXX, XXX and you coordinate the naturing of Ron
Paul.  Your goal is to get him to agree to file the written
objection NLT Jan 3rd.
 
Are you’ll up to that challenge?  If Ron Paul does sign on, he
will bring other Constitutionalists along in both the Senate and
House.”

Obviously Ron Paul is not paying attention.

I spent most of my time trying to debunk what I believed
about natural born citizen and after much reading posted
the following on the Citizen Wells blog on December 28,
2008:

Natural born citizen explained

Dean Haskins used this information to
produce this excellent video:

Exactly What IS a Natural Born Citizen?

Leo Donofrio has posted his most recent opinion about natural
born citizen and the influence of Vattel on the founding
fathers. Thanks to Phil at the Right Side of Life website
for the heads up.

“ONE FINAL POINT ABOUT THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE.

The more I read Vattel (pictured above), specifically the passage which defines “natural-born citizen”, the more convinced I become that the framers understood Vattel much better than we have on this issue.  I now am firmly convinced that the framers relied on Vattel’s definition when they included the natural born citizen clause in Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5.

Yesterday, I had a revelation as to what Vattel meant and what the framers intended “natural born citizen” to mean in the Constitution.  It’s obvious that the framers drew a distinction between the meaning of “citizen” and the meaning of “natural born citizen”.  A “citizen” can be Senator or Representative, but in order to be President one must be a natural born citizen.

It’s the difference between a fact and a legal status.

Whether you are a natural born citizen is a fact of nature which can’t be waived or renounced, but your actual legal citizenship can be renounced.  The difference is subtle, but so very important.  “Natural born citizen” is not a different form of “citizenship”.  It is a manner of acquiring citizenship.  And while natural born citizens may end their legal tie to the country by renouncing citizenship, they will always have been naturally born into that nation as a citizen.

Let’s take a look at Vattel’s famous text:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

Two different sentences.  Two different civil groups are being discussed.

Examine the subject heading given by Vattel, “Natives and Citizens”.  Two separate groups of the civil society are addressed in the heading. And here is the start of the greatest proof that the framers relied on Vattel as to the natural born citizen clause.

In the passage above, the first sentence defines who the “citizens” of a civil society are.  Vattel states; “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages.”

In the very next sentence he describes a different set of people wherein he states,  “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

There are natives and citizens, just as the header says.   All citizens are members of the civil society, but not all citizens are natives or natural-born citizens.  A native can’t renounce his “nativeness”.  He’s a native forever.  He might renounce the citizenship he gained through being a native, but he can’t renounce the FACT of his birth as a native.

Vattel equates natives with natural-born citizens.  They are the same.  According to Vattel, in order to be a native, one must be born of the soil and the blood of two citizen parents.

He goes on as follows:

“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights…I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Some have argued that this passage indicates only one parent – the father – is necessary for one to be a natural born citizen.  That is false. The above passage only mentions the word “citizen”.  It says the children of the father are “citizens”, but it does not say they are “natives or natural-born citizens”.  Vattel is discussing the legality of citizenship, not the fact of one’s birth as being native.

When Vattel wrote this in 1758, he wasn’t arguing for its inclusion in a future US Constitution as a qualification for being President.  But the framers did read his work.  And when it came to choosing the President, they wanted a “natural-born citizen”, not just a citizen.  That is clear in the Constitution.  Vattel doesn’t say that “natives or natural-born citizens” have any special legal rights over “citizens”.  He simply described a phenomenon of nature, that the citizenship of those who are born on the soil to citizen parents (plural) is a “natural-born citizen”.

Citizen = legal status

Native or natural-born citizen = fact of birth which bestows citizenship.

Vattel also wrote:

“The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born.

Once again, he does not mention natives or natural-born citizens in this passage, just citizens.  Furthermore, he states that the citizens may renounce their citizenship when they come of legal age.  But nobody can renounce a fact of birth.  The fact is true or it is not true. You’re either “born” a natural-born citizen or you are not.  The legal citizenship which attaches to this fact of birth may be renounced, but the fact will be with you forever.

And it is that fact of birth the framers sought to guarantee for each President of the United States.  The framers ruled that the commander in chief be a natural born citizen.  Like Vattel, the framers purposely distinguished between “citizens” and “natural born citizens”.  And to that distinction there can only be one effect:

ONLY A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CAN BE PRESIDENT.

According to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, the 14th amendment cannot make the natural born citizen clause from Article 2 Section 1 superfluous.  If being born as a 14th Amendment citizen was enough to be President, then the natural born citizen clause would have no effect.  According to Marshall, that argument is inadimissible.

President Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States whethe he was born in Hawaii or not.

FAREWELL.

I am not going to protest any longer.  As a Christian, I’m somewhat convinced this nation has been judged by the almighty and his fury may be descending as we speak.  Such fury appears to be in the form of Constitutional cancer.  I have prayed over my continuing role in this battle and the answer to those prayers said I am done here.  As a true believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, I place my faith not in any organized religion but in the words of the lamb and the voice of God.  Peace be with you.

Leo C. Donofrio

03.18.2009″

 

Read more:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/18/two-minute-warning-vattel-decoded/

 

I respectfully disagree with Leo Donofrio on one important aspect.
Barack Obama is not president under the US Constitution. No amount
of swearing in makes one president. Only a combination of the
election process and being qualified under the US Constitution makes
one president.

15 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, American Revolution, Announcements, Barack Obama, Berg, Birth Certificate, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Congress, Declaration of Independence, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Federal Court, Founding Fathers, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Leo Donofrio, Military officers, Natural born citizen, New Jersey, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, RestoreThe ConstitutionalRepublic.com, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Military, US Soldier, video, voters, Washington DC, YouTube

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Orly Taitz interview, Sunday, March 22, 2009, Radio interview, Quo Warranto, Obama ineligible, usapatriots-shout radio, Mieke and Therese show, Keyes lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Defending Our Freedoms Foundation

Posted on March 17, 2009 | 69 comments

Just in:

“Mieke and Therese hosts of USAPatriots-shout, a blog talk radio program, share information that is rarely broadcast on main stream media (MSM). We believe the truth supersedes labeling, party affiliations, and “political correctness”.  Join them Sunday night as the great “Opinionators” give you their take on what’s happening with our country! 
 
Mark your calender
 you don’t want to miss this broadcast
 
Blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout
 
Sunday night (03-22-09)  8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Pacific Standard Time
 
 
We are proud and honored to welcome DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ
Topic is:
QUO WARRANTO
 
What ON EARTH is QUO WARRANTO?
WILL QUO WARRANTO BE THE METHOD TO MAKE OBAMA PRODUCE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO PROVE HE IS ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OR FORCE HIM TO STEP DOWN? 
 
Discover the answers to these and more questions this Sunday evening on blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout with Dr. Taitz
 
If you haven’t discovered Dr. Taitz, yet, you are in for a treat.  Those of you who have been following her heroic efforts will also have the opportunity to call and ask her questions.
 
 
“Dr. Orly Taitz, the principal attorney behind the Keyes lawsuit, was born in the Former Soviet Union. Dr. Taitz escaped from the FSU over 20 years ago to begin a life of freedom in the United States. Dr. Taitz has a successful dentistry practice in Orange County, California, and is a licensed attorney and real estate agent. Dr. Taitz speaks five languages. Dr. Taitz’ experiences under the totalitarian Communist regime convinced her that this is a path that she would rather not see the United States take. Therefore, Orly is committed to doing everything in her power to prevent such a disastrous mistake, and to defend the rights and freedoms that exist for all citizens in the United States under the Constitution. Dr. Taitz has filed a second lawsuit associated with the Obama Eligibility Crisis that is currently before the Supreme Court and is working on a third lawsuit featuring active duty and retired military as plaintiffs. With Dr. Taitz’ help, Orly’s Keyes lawsuit has been successfully cloned in Florida and in Washington State, where other complaints are active. Dr. Taitz has just filed application for a foundation to carry on this work entitled the “Defending Our Freedoms Foundation”. “
 
New site launch: http://defendourfreedoms.us/

Country: United States
 
www.blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout this Sunday evening, March 22,  2009 between 8 and 10 pm Pacific Standard Time.  You may call 646-727-3865 to ask questions.
 
 What a great opportunity to call in or write and share and discuss these issues!
 
You can write to the chat room at www.blogtalkradio.com/usapatriots-shout
 
 call 646-727-3865
You can also post comments at
 
www.blogtalkradio.usapatriots-shout
or usapatriots-shout.blogspot.com”

69 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Blog Talk Radio, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Democrats, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Law, Election update, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, John Roberts, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Lightfoot v. Bowen, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Quo Warranto, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Orly Taitz interview, March 17, 2009, Steve Malzberg, Lawsuits, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Scalia, Obama not eligible, Birth Certificate, Obama not natural born citizen, US Supreme Court, US Military plaintiffs, Malzberg radio show

Posted on March 17, 2009 | 43 comments

From an email we received:

“We received word from Steve Malzberg that Attorney Orly Taitz will be on his show today.    
     As much of our country knows (and increasingly other parts of the world), she is the relentless California attorney who is seeking to have Mr. Obama release his Original Birth Certificate (and other documents) now to prove his eligibility for president, especially as our young troops are about to be sent to Mexico, as new “economic” measures are signed, etc.
     So, it’s a must catch, especially with all that’s happening.
    She will be on Super Steve’s show today, 3-17-09,
    at 4pm (Eastern), on 710-am radio…
    and online at  www.worradio.com. , http://www.wor710.com/
    http://www.wor710.com/pages/418904.php  3-6pm. (Eastern)
    Among other items, she will likely be discussing her recent public interactions with Supreme Court Justice Scalia and Chief Justice Roberts.
    Again, this is a must catch, regardless of party, as any transparency issues  involving eligibility affect our nation right to local law enforcement, our military, etc. (many bcc’d herein).  Further, she will likely discuss  the apparently unbelievable actions of certain court employees.
    By the way, we have not seen the original birth certificate…nor have any of you.  So we don’t know whether there is eligibility or not. We think we all should know, especially those of us that voted for him.   Don’t you?
    Many of you will logically ask, as we did, “Well, he must have shown his birth certificate  when he was vetted.  I had to show mine for my job” (especially law enforcement).
   OK, we couldn’t find it; not at Party (both) sites, the State Departments, the Electors, etc.  If any of you can, please show us…or just save time and listen to Dr. Taitz and Super Steve.
   Please circulate; it is a most important show………..
, as we did, “Well, he must have shown his birth certificate when he was vetted.  I had to show it for my job” (especially law enforcement).
   OK, we couldn’t find it; not at Party (both) sites, the State Departments, the Electors, etc.  If any of you can, please show us…or just save time and listen to Dr. Taitz and Super Steve.
   Please circulate; it is a most important show………..”

Orly Taitz website:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/

43 Comments

Posted in Alan Keyes, Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Blog Talk Radio, California, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Congress, Court of Appeals, Democrats, District Court, DNC, Dr. Orly Taitz, Election, Election 2008, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Federal Court, Generals, Government, Hawaii, Inauguration, indictment, Indonesia, Judges, Justice, Kenya, Keyes lawsuit, Lightfoot v. Bowen, Military officers, Natural born citizen, News, Obama indictment, Obama Nation, Obama records, Obama thugs, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, Quo Warranto, Secretary of State, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Talk Radio, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Soldier, voters

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,