Category Archives: Court of Appeals

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

FROM THE SCOTUS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

Dec 30 2020     Petition for a writ of mandamus

“The Georgia Legislature has plenary authority to set the “Times, Places
and Manner” of Federal Elections and has clearly set forth the procedures to be
followed in verifying the identity of in-person voters as well as mail-in absentee ballot voters. The Georgia Secretary of State usurped that power by entering into a Settlement Agreement with the Democratic Party earlier this year and issuing an “Official Election Bulletin” that modified the Legislature’s clear procedures for verifying the identity of mail-in voters. The effect of the Secretary of State’s
unauthorized procedure is to treat the class of voters who vote by mail different from the class of voters who vote in-person, like Petitioner. That procedure dilutes the votes of in-person voters by votes from persons whose identities are less likely to verified as required by the legislative scheme. The Secretary’s unconstitutional modifications to the legislative scheme violated Petitioner’s Equal Protection rights by infringing on his fundamental right to vote. The Eleventh Circuit has held that Petitioner does not have standing to chall enge State action that dilutes his vote and infringes upon his constitutional right to Equal Protection. The questions presented are:”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-887/165104/20201230211038462_Emergency%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Mandamus.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday March 5, 2021, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission, Lin Wood v Raffensperger

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday March 5, 2021, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission, Lin Wood v Raffensperger

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

No. 20-883

Donald J. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-883

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday February 19, 2021, Arizona Georgia Pennsylvania Michigan Wisconsin

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday February 19, 2021, Arizona Georgia Pennsylvania Michigan Wisconsin

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

“Resolved, That the members of the Wisconsin State Assembly place the
redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures as its highest priority “...WI legislature Jan 4, 2021

 

From the US Supreme Court Friday, February 19, 2021.

No. 20-542

Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-542

No. 20-815

Timothy King, et al. v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-815

No. 20-882

Donald J. Trump, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-882

No. 20-845

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-845

No. 20-809

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-809

No. 20-799

L. Lin Wood, Jr. v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-799

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

 

No. 20-810

Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al. v. Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-810

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona election audit update February 6, 2021, Senate votes on Maricopa Board contempt Mon, Mike Lindell AZ vote irregularities look plausible, Left panics

Arizona election audit update February 6, 2021, Senate votes on Maricopa Board contempt Mon, Mike Lindell AZ vote irregularities look plausible, Left panics

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The resolution, introduced by Senate President Karen Fann, R-Prescott, states that all five of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors are in contempt of the Arizona Senate for refusing to turn over access to election equipment and ballots that the Senate demanded for an audit. It also directs Fann to take “all legal action” to enforce the subpoena.”…Arizona Senate

 

The left is in panic mode.

That is why they are attacking Mike Lindell and his “Absolute Proof” video revealing vast irregularities in the 2020 election in battleground states.

Lindell’s irrgularities and numbers for Arizona appear plausible and in line with other data revelations.

https://michaeljlindell.com/

We already knew for example that there were over 200,000 adjudicated ballots in Maricopa County alone.

They are a problem.

The left is further in panic mode over the imminent full audit from the Arizona Senate.

Senate President Fann

“There are two primary reasons we have determined the Senate needed to retain its own independent auditing firm. The Senate has consistently called for an auditor certified by the U. S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). We have now learned the EAC does not certify auditors as such. The other primary reason is that the scope of the audit must be broader than the one proposed by the County’s vendors. Our firm will perform everything we have required in the subpoenas. We must bring back confidence that the election results reported are how votes were legally cast. The Senate’s forensic audit will bring accuracy and detail to the process, and with that restore integrity to the election process.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/03/arizona-senate-election-audit-update-february-3-2021-maricopa-county-board-of-supervisors-refuses-to-comply-our-firm-will-perform-everything-we-have-required-in-the-subpoenas/

Maricopa Board of Supervisors contempt

“All 16 Republicans in the Arizona Senate signed on to a measure introduced Wednesday afternoon that could lead to sending the Senate’s sergeant at arms to arrest Maricopa County’s elected supervisors as early as Friday.
The resolution, introduced by Senate President Karen Fann, R-Prescott, states that all five of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors are in contempt of the Arizona Senate for refusing to turn over access to election equipment and ballots that the Senate demanded for an audit. It also directs Fann to take “all legal action” to enforce the subpoena.
Under state law, the Senate can send the sergeant at arms to arrest the five supervisors and bring them before the Senate. “

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

 

Kathy Boockvar corrupt anti Trump Pennsylvania Secretary of State resigns Feb 5, PA senate: “numerous unawful violations”, Multiple court cases active

Kathy Boockvar corrupt anti Trump Pennsylvania Secretary of State resigns Feb 5, PA senate: “numerous unawful violations”, Multiple court cases active

“Using the title ‘President’ before the word ‘Trump’ really demeans the office of the presidency”...Kathy Boockvar tweet 2017

“numerous unawful violations taken by Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf; Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar”  “Due to these inconsistent and questionable activities, we believe that PA election results should not have been certified by our Secretary of State,”...PA senate Jan 4, 2021

“Until these unlawful practices are acknowledged and corrected, we cannot agree to support electors chosen based upon an inaccurate total vote count. The voters of Pennsylvania deserve integrity in the election process and equal protection under the law.”…PA Congress Members Dec 31, 2020

 

Kathy Boockvar resignation truth from Citizen Wells.

“Kathy Boockvar, who is Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, will no longer hold that position after February 5th, 2021. Boockvar is resigning at the urges of Governor Tom Wolf due to two major ‘scandal’ issues. Even though these 2 issues have recently come to light, she’s worked in that department for over 3 years, so who knows what else she has done during that time. Her resignation just so happens to come right after endless negative judgments were made about her handling of 2 major issues. Those two issues include her handling of the 2020 elections, which she was sued for by Trump’s 2020 campaign, and the way she managed the new state constitutional amendment that has to do with child sexual abuse victims. What exactly did she do that was so wrong??”

Read more:

https://unapologeticrepublican.com/pa-secretary-of-state-kathy-boockvar-resigns-due-to-scandals/

President Trump and his supporters were never going to get fair treatment in Pennsylvania.

Kathy Boockvar anti Trumper

“The woman in charge of overseeing Pennsylvania’s ballot-counting process has repeatedly attacked President Trump, even tweeting that addressing him by his title “demeans” the office to which people elected him.

Since 2015, Kathy Boockvar, Pennsylvania’s secretary of state, has relentlessly attacked Trump on Twitter, starting from when he was an underdog in the GOP primary.

“This is awesome,” Boockvar tweeted on Dec. 11, 2015. “The absolutely epic trolling letter Jeb Bush’s leadership PAC sent to Donald Trump’s lawyer,” before linking to an article from the Washington Post.

Many of her tweets over the last four years included critical coverage of Trump, such as incorrect predictions that his victory would “significantly weaken the US, driving us into a lengthy recession.””

Read more:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pennsylvanias-top-election-official-repeatedly-attacked-trump-on-twitter

Pennsylvania Senate exposes Boockvar January 4, 2021.

“As members of the Pennsylvania Senate, we believe in the integrity of the election process. After speaking with our colleagues, a majority of the State Senate is troubled by the many inconsistencies that happened in our Commonwealth during the 2020 election.

Due to the numerous unawful violations taken by Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf; Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar; and the rogue State Supreme Court, the balance of power was taken from the State Legislature, who by the US and PA Constitutions set the time, place and manner of holding elections.”

“Due to these inconsistent and questionable activities, we believe that PA election results should not have been certified by our Secretary of State,”

Members, we ask for more time given the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court is to hear Trump vs. Boockvar in the coming days. We ask that you delay certification of the Electoral College to allow due process as we pursue election integrity in our Commonwealth.”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/06/pennsylvania-senate-letter-stating-pa-election-results-should-not-have-been-certified-and-requesting-electoral-college-delay-view-and-read/

PA MEMBERS OF CONGRESS STATEMENT December 31, 2020

“Unfortunately, the many unlawful actions undertaken by the Pennsylvania Governor’s office, the Secretary of State, and what has been described as a rogue Pennsylvania Supreme Court exceeded and circumvented the state legislature’s clear constitutional authority.

“The unlawful actions include, but are not limited to:

  • Accepting ballots past 8:00 pm on Election Day
  • Not properly requiring signatures to match those on mail-in ballots or requiring dates
    • Meanwhile, the matching of signatures was required at a polling site
  • Authorizing the curing of mail-in ballots with less than a 24-hour’s notice
    • Only some counties were informed and adhered to this order leaving voters treated unequally from county to county
  • Authorizing the use of unsecure drop boxes, which is not permitted in statute
  • Prohibiting certified poll watchers overseeing the canvassing of ballots in Philadelphia”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/31/pennsylvania-members-of-us-house-of-representatives-dan-meuser-et-al-statement-regarding-certification-of-electors-december-31-2020-pa-unlawful-actions/

 

Pennsylvania House Resolution 1094 November 30, 2020

“3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/01/pennsylvania-house-resolution-1094-disputing-the-2020-general-election-statewide-contest-results-referred-to-state-government-nov-30-2020/

Active court cases

Trump v Boockvar US Supreme Court

https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=329

Trump v Boockvar US Supreme Court

https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=346

Trump v Boockvar US Supreme Court

https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=379

More here:

http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

 

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al US District Court Eastern Texas filed December 27, 2020, VP Pence as President of Senate is subject solely to 12th Amendment

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al US District Court Eastern Texas filed December 27, 2020, VP Pence as President of Senate is subject solely to 12th Amendment

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

“And if I were a Democrat primary voter, I’d want these questions satisfactorily answered before I cast my final vote.”…Senator Johnson Mar 4, 2020 on Hunter Biden investigation

 

From

Louie Gohmert et al v Michael Pence et al

Filed December 27, 2020 in 

US District Court Eastern Texas

COMPLAINT FOR EXPEDITED
DECLARATORY AND
EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
73. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court issue a judgment that:
A. Declares that Section 15 of the Electoral Count Act, 3 U.S.C. §§5 and 15, is
unconstitutional because it violates the Twelfth Amendment on its face, Amend.
XII, Constitution;
B. Declares that Section 15 of the Electoral Count Act, 3 U.S.C. §§5 and 15, is
unconstitutional because it violates the Electors Clause. U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1,
cl. 1;
C. Declares that Vice-President Pence, in his capacity as President of Senate and
Presiding Officer of the January 6, 2021 Joint Session of Congress, is subject
solely to the requirements of the Twelfth Amendment and may exercise the exclusive authority and sole discretion in determining which electoral votes to
count for a given State;

D. Enjoins reliance on any provisions of the Electoral Count Act that would limit
Defendant’s exclusive authority and his sole discretion to determine which of two
or more competing slates of electors’ votes are to be counted for President;
E. Declares that, with respect to competing slates of electors from the State of
Arizona or other Contested States, or with respect to objection to any single slate
of electors, the Twelfth Amendment contains the exclusive dispute resolution
mechanisms, namely, that (i) Vice-President Pence determines which slate of
electors’ votes shall be counted, or if none be counted, for that State and (ii) if no
person has a majority, then the House of Representatives (and only the House of
Representatives) shall choose the President where “the votes [in the House of
Representatives] shall be taken by states, the representation from each state
having one vote,” U.S. CONST. amend. XII;
F. Declares that, also with respect to competing slates of electors, the alternative
dispute resolution procedure or priority rule in 3 U.S.C. § 15, is null and void
insofar as it contradicts and replaces the Twelfth Amendment rules above by with
an entirely different procedure in which the House and Senate each separately
“decide” which slate is to be counted, and in the event of a disagreement, then
only “the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by
the executive of the State … shall be counted,” 3 U.S.C. § 15;

G. Enjoins the Defendant from executing his duties on January 6th during the Joint
Session of Congress in any manner that is insistent with the declaratory relief set
forth herein, and
H. Issue any other declaratory judgments or findings or injunctions necessary to
support or effectuate the foregoing declaratory judgment.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Gohmert-v-Pence.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Trump v Boockvar PA SOS et al US Supreme Court filed December 20, 2020, ” statutory provisions…may not be ignored by state election officials or changed by state courts”

Trump v Boockvar PA SOS et al US Supreme Court filed December 20, 2020, ” statutory provisions…may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts”

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“Big news coming out of Pennsylvania. Very big illegal ballot drop that cannot be accounted for. Rigged Election!”...President Trump December 21, 2020
“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

 

From

DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.,

v

Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, et al

Filed in the US Supreme Court December 20, 2020.

“Article II of the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint [electors
for President and Vice President] in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may
direct.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). That power is “plenary,” and the statutory provisions enacted by the legislature in the furtherance of that
constitutionally-assigned duty may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts. Bush v. Gore (“Bush II”), 531 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2000).

Yet, during the 2020 presidential election, that is what the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court did in four cases – three at issue in this Petition, and one already
before the Court. Statutory requirements were eliminated regarding signature
verification, the right of campaigns to challenge invalid mail ballots, mandates that mail voters fill in, date, and sign mail ballot declarations, and even the right of campaigns to observe the mail ballot canvassing process in a meaningful way.

Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania
Legislature. According to public reports, without these protections, the resulting
disqualification rate of invalid ballots was anemic—meaning over 110,000 invalid ballots were illegally counted—more than enough to have affected the outcome of the election, where the margin between the two principal candidates for President currently stands at 80,558. The questions presented are therefore:

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-boockvar-petition.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing, “should not be certified”, “chaotic and the results cannot be trusted”

GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing, “should not be certified”, “chaotic and the results cannot be trusted”

“Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., a cybersecurity expert from Texas, testified that his team had compared data from Dominion voting machines in those places where they were used around the nation…..Ramsland estimated that these anomalies translated to between 123,000 and 136,000 extra votes for Vice President Biden in Georgia.”…GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

 

From

THE CHAIRMAN’S REPORT OF THE ELECTION LAW
STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE
OF THE STANDING SENATE
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY FROM DECEMBER 3, 2020 HEARING
Honorable William T. Ligon, Chairman

“V. FINDINGS
1- The November 3, 2020 election was chaotic and the results cannot be trusted.
2- The Secretary of State and the State Elections Board failed to enforce the law as written in the Georgia Code, and furthermore, created policies that contravened State law. As Senator Matt Brass concluded at the December 3 hearing, “We have heard evidence that State law was not followed, time after time after time.”
3- The Secretary of State failed to have a transparent process for the verification of signatures for absentee ballots, for the counting of votes during the subsequent recount and audit, and for providing the type of guidance and enforcement necessary to ensure that monitors and other observers had meaningful access to the process.
4- The Secretary of State instituted an unconstitutional gag order so that monitors were told not to use photography or video recording devices during the recount.
5- Election officials at all levels failed to secure test ballots and actual ballots. Many reports indicate that proper procedures were not followed, and there was systematic failure to maintain appropriate records of the chain of custody for these ballots, both prior to and after voting and throughout the recount.
6- The Secretary of State and Election Supervisors failed to stop hostile behavior of workers toward citizen volunteer monitors during the recount process.
7- The events at the State Farm Arena are particularly disturbing because they
demonstrated intent on the part of election workers to exclude the public from viewing the counting of ballots, an intentional disregard for the law. The number of votes that could have been counted in that length of time was sufficient to change the results of the presidential election and the senatorial contests. Furthermore, there appears to be coordinated illegal activities by election workers themselves who purposely placed fraudulent ballots into the final election totals.
8- Grants from private sources provided financial incentives to county officials and exerted influence over the election process.
9- The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”

Read more:

http://www.senatorligon.com/THE_FINAL%20REPORT.PDF

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

Antrim County MI audit redacted information reveals election results flipped, Analyst who led the forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems, SOS Benson pushed redaction

Antrim County MI audit redacted information reveals election results flipped, Analyst who led the forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems, SOS Benson pushed redaction

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”…Antrim County audit report

 

From The Epoch Times December 19, 2020.

“Redacted Information in Dominion Audit Report Shows Races Were Flipped: Analyst

The analyst who led the forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems in Michigan said on Friday the information state officials pushed to redact shows that the outcomes of races were changed.

“The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done,’” Russell Ramsland Jr. said during a virtual appearance on Newsmax’s “Greg Kelly Reports.”

“But at that point, Dominion’s argument is no longer with us. Dominion’s argument is with their own user’s manual and their own logs, because the logs—had they been able to be published—show very clearly that the RCV [ranked-choice voting] algorithm was enacted. It shows very clearly that the error messages were massive. It was very clearly [sic] that races were flipped,” he added.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Ramsland and his team at Allied Security Operations Group earlier this month audited Dominion machines and software in Antrim County, where officials on election night reported a win for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. The officials later said the results were skewed and that President Donald Trump actually received more votes in the county.

The audit was the first conducted post-election of Dominion products. It was part of a court case.”

“In the audit, Ramsland said his team concluded Dominion’s voting system “is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”

“The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified,” he added in the report.”

Read more:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/redacted-information-in-dominion-audit-report-shows-races-were-flipped-analyst_3625228.html

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Todd C Bank Amicus brief in Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al US Supreme Court Dec 18, “person who sustains personal harm” “has Article III standing”

Todd C Bank Amicus brief in Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al US Supreme Court Dec 18, “person who sustains personal harm” “has Article III standing”

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity
expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.”…Marbury vs Madison

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.

“Attorney Sidney Powell recently stated her cases were being “slow walked” by the SCOTUS. Justice Roberts should be recused.”...Citizen Wells

 

From:

Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et a

US Supreme Court

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF TODD C. BANK

Filed December 18, 2020.

“SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

The District Court did not recognize that a person who sustains personal harm
within the meaning of Article III of the Constitution has Article III standing regardless of how many other persons suffered the same type and degree of harm.

The District Court, in finding that de-certification would be improper because
it would result in the denial of the right to vote to those persons who voted for
candidate Biden (“Biden”), overlooked the fact that the denial of de-certification would, in the event that candidate Trump (“Trump”) had received more lawful votes than had Biden, deny the right to vote of those persons who had lawfully voted for Trump.

The District Court overlooked the fact that the diluting of one’s vote is distinctly
harmful to a person who voted for a candidate who would have prevailed absent
unlawful conduct.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/164238/20201218233109254_King_v._Whitmer_Bank_Amicus_Brief.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/