Category Archives: Joe Biden

Larry Sinclair book, Obama drug encounter November 1999, Obama camp thugs, Sinclair YouTube video, Larry Sinclair story, Personal attacks, Delaware arrest, National Press Club, Donald Young murder, 2008 election book

Barack Obama became a curiousity in the news when he sought and gained a US Senate seat and spoke at the Democrat Convention in 2004. When Obama began his run for the presidency he, of course, became more news worthy. However, the one event and breaking story that probably gained the attention of more people and subsequently caused Obama to be scrutinized more by more people, was the YouTube video and allegation from Larry Sinclair of a drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999. This was the catalyst for me and many others to examine the life, character and associations of Obama more closely. Not only did many more people get involved reasearching Obama, but Larry Sinclair’s websites became a gathering place for sharing information and and experiences with the Obama camp that varied from personal attacks and death threats to tampering of information on the internet and shutting down of sites questioning Obama.

We witnessed a new paradyme of news gathering and presentation. The MSM failed to report the truth about
Obama and Sean Hannity referred to this as the death of journalism. The internet began to take over as
the only place to find out about the real Obama. Of course the Obama camp tried it’s best to thwart the efforts by citizen journalists. This is where Larry Sinclair and many other bloggers and internet reporters stepped in. Despite the MSM not only ignoring the Larry Sinclair allegations and other important stories about Obama and along with the Obama camp trying to discredit Sinclair and anyone questioning Obama, Larry Sinclair and the internet news prevailed.

Larry Sinclair is publishing a book about his encounter with Obama in 1999 and the bigger story of his
experience trying to get Obama to be held accountable and making the public aware. This is an incredible
story that I have watched play out from a front row seat to my astonishment and disbelief. Up to this point
in my life, I have only read about experiences like this happening in other countries. However, despite
this all appearing surreal, it did indeed happen. As soon as Larry Sinclair produced his YouTube video,
he received personal attacks and death threats on his person and family, website attacks and eventual
incarceration in Delaware. This did not happen in the Soviet Union, Kenya or South America. This happened
in America.

I have followed, researched and written about the Larry Sinclair story probably more than any other source.
I can state with authority that Larry Sinclair could not have made up this story. I hope to write a book in the
near future and will elaborate on that and cover the other stories I have been associated with. However,
only Larry Sinclair can tell his story. Here is a quick statement that I sent to Larry recently for possible
inclusion in his book:
“The Larry Sinclair story was the catalyst for me and many others to begin questioning
the character and background of Barack Obama, a candidate that most of us knew little about.
Mr. Sinclair’s allegations appeared preposterous at first but captured my curiousity.
I began by examining the Official Illinois State Senate records for the period of November 3 – 8,
1999. I discovered that Obama was missing on November 4, 1999. I thought, “interesting.”
I then read the transcripts from the Tim Russert, Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times.
All three interviews asked Obama about his records during his tenure in the Illinois
Senate. Obama was consistently vague and evasive in his answers. This piqued my curiousity more.
One thing led to another and within a few days I knew that we had a problem with Obama. I had reached
the point of no return and could not in good conscience abandon my efforts. I continued to follow
the Larry Sinclair story and watched it play out in detail. I got to know Larry and we achieved
a level of mutual trust that soon became a precious commodity.
 
The Larry Sinclair story evolved into at least four large separate stories:
1. The initial encounter with Obama in 1999.
2. The Donald Young controversy.
3. The attacks made on Larry Sinclair, those following his story and anyone questioning
the “messiah” Obama.
4. The changing and withholding of internet information and attempts to prevent Larry Sinclair
and others from reporting the truth.
 
I have come to know Larry Sinclair as a person and not just a story. I admire Larry for his
persistence in the face of incredible odds, his integrity and his patriotism.”

If you want to know more about the real Barack Obama and what really happened during the 2008 election.
If you want to read a book about real events that are so surreal they appear as fiction, order a
copy of Larry Sinclair’s book here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/

Barack Obama, Vote NO, November 4, 2008, Election day, Zach Jones article, Eulogy or Epiphany for America

Zach Jones, a great American, who has done his best to reveal the truth about Obama and has helped the Citizen Wells blog in a big way, has presented an article that is a must read:

“Eulogy or Epiphany for America

America’s Eulogy Could Begin to Take Shape on Election Day

Well it seems the election is upon us. It’s time to decide the direction of the United States of America for the future. Much of the world has voiced their preference and the American media has long demonstrated its preference. The first exit polls are in from Israel and they were a bit of a surprise. Reason as opposed to faith in the iconoclast seems to have ruled the day in Israel, going against the wisdom of prior polls. However, it’s too early to cheer for a possible epiphany occurring widely in the electorate.

Nevertheless, I have high hopes that an epiphany in working America’s psyche IS taking place. What else can I do, given the alternative that a eulogy for America and her Constitution will be coming in the not too distant future? Therefore, I choose to have HOPE that a majority of Americans will search their heart of hearts and say, NO, I’m not going to put America’s future at risk with someone who in so inexperienced and unknown.

I have hope that a majority of American’s will say, NO, I’m not going to be told who to vote for just because 90 percent of the media is in love with their fictionalized portrayal of Sen. Obama. I have hope that a majority of America’s will say, NO, I’m not going to vote for someone just because my spouse or kids may be infatuated with the illusory idea of the “One” who can solve all America’s problems – I will rely on reason as opposed to faith. I have enormous hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I am not racist just because I oppose Sen. Obama, there a hundreds of valid reasons to oppose the Senator.

I have high hopes that a majority will say NO, I don’t want America to go down the path of becoming a socialist nation because there has never been a successful socialist nation that didn’t trample individual freedoms. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, redistribution of wealth by the government clearly puts us on the path of socialism.

I have high hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, it is really important not to forget what we learned from 9/11; that there is a patient deadly enemy of America who is set on our destruction and imposing Islamic law worldwide. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, Sen. Obama’s inclination towards appeasement will not work to protect us from such dangerous, determined foes. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, remembering the lessons of Chamberlain’s appeasement before the start of WWII. I have hope that Americans will think about Sen. Obama’s recent possible violations the Logan Act regarding Iraq and Kenya.

I have hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, we don’t know enough about who Sen. Obama is and we refuse to be sold a bill of goods without facts to back his narrative up. I have hopes that Americans will not suspend their common sense when analyzing Sen. Obama’s connection to ACORN and their connections to voter fraud.

I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I’m not completely convinced that Sen. Obama has played by all the rules in this election. Why would numerous lawsuits spring up that challenge Sen. Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the President? The lawsuit Berg v. Obama being the most prominent is now filing motions in the Supreme Court. I have high hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I’m not going to vote for Sen. Obama unless he steps away from his instinctual role of legal tactician and provides credible evidence to refute the allegations raised in Berg v. Obama. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, we do not want a Constitutional Crisis being the focus of our attention for the coming months.

I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, one’s past close associations do matter in judging a candidate’s judgment, beliefs, predispositions, and goals. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, the media has not been a purveyor of sufficient or completely accurate information regarding Sen. Obama’s past associations.

We need to know more about Sen. Obama’s past associations. We need to know much more about Rev. Wright and black theology, William Ayers and Socialism, Frank Davis and Communism, Bernadine Dorn, Rashid Khalidi, Tony Rezko, ACORN and voter fraud, Farrakhan, Father Pfleger, Larry Sinclair and sex/drugs, Robert Blackwell, Jr., Nadhmi Auchi, and many, many more. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, because they want to know who will be sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom.

I have a determined hope that a majority of American’s will say, NO, it really is OK to be patriotic and be proud to be Americans.

It continues to amaze me that the media has managed to accomplish their goal of having Sen. Obama on the verge of taking (not winning, since that implies playing fair) the Presidency.

In an America where the schools are not focused on teaching American history and its system of laws and justice, why should I expect people not to be easily misled? I suppose in an America where everyone is working so hard to make ends meet, there is not enough time to teach and learn the traditions and history that have brought us this far as a people; and has guided our decisions about governance. In an America where many focus so much time on You Tube, I-Pods, the Internet, Video Games and MTV; it must be hard for people to acquire a personal awareness of American principals and understandings; those set forth in the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.

I worry that many today see life as a big American game show with few real consequences concerning each person’s individual participation. It’s a game and each wants to be the Obama avatar created by the media as cool, hip, and inspiring; or one of his devotees. Unfortunately, it’s not a game. Each voter must look closely at their choices and realize that the consequences of making an uninformed decision cannot be undone by pushing the replay button.

Today, the meaning of America seems to have been lost from our common lexicon. We must get it back if America is to have a long and prosperous future. Don’t get me wrong, many of us do know America; however, our numbers appear to be dwindling. A McCain Presidency will buy time to get America on the right track for all of us by bringing ethics, honesty, courage, and experience to Washington. I know the America I love and I will hold fast to my belief that America’s journey has been a noble one, not a perfect one, but a truly noble one. I’m not ready to write her eulogy and that’s why I’m voting for McCain/Palin.

In the privacy of the voting booth exists the time and space to have an epiphany and make a sound choice for America’s future. Here’s hoping you all have a grand epiphany soon!

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.
Mohandas Gandhi”

Ohio Coal Association, Obama bankrupt coal industry, November 3, 2008, Campaign pandering in Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana, Pennsylvania, votes from coal supporters, Obama Biden ticket spells disaster for America’s coal industry, BREAKING NEWS

The Ohio Coal Association, OCA, has responded to the Obama interview from January 2008 in San Francisco. In the interview Obama speaks of bankrupting coal plants and skyrocketing energy prices. Here is the Ohio Coal Association response:

“COLUMBUS, Ohio, Nov. 3 /PRNewswire–USNewswire/ — Mike Carey, president of the Ohio Coal Association (OCA), today issued the following statement in response to just-released remarks from Senator Barack Obama about the nation’s coal industry.

“Regardless of the timing or method of the release of these remarks, the message from the Democratic candidate for President could not be clearer: the Obama-Biden ticket spells disaster for America’s coal industry and the tens of thousands of Americans who work in it.

“These undisputed, audio-taped remarks, which include comments from Senator Obama like ‘I haven’t been some coal booster’ and ‘if they want to build [coal plants], they can, but it will bankrupt them’ are extraordinarily misguided.

“It’s evident that this campaign has been pandering in states like Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana and Pennsylvania to attempt to generate votes from coal supporters, while keeping his true agenda hidden from the state’s voters.”

Read more here:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20081103.CLM078&show_article=1

To Sarah Palin from Citizen Wells, Biden question, Debate, October 2, 2008, Obama motion to dismiss Philip J Berg lawsuit

Sarah Palin, here is my question for you to ask Joe Biden:

Mr. Biden, why did Barack Obama file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Philip J Berg instead of proving his citizenship?

Why didn’t Obama provide a vault COLB?

John McCain provided a vault COLB to congress.

Is Obama an illegal alien?

Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Hillary, Obama disqualified, Obama removed, Biden drops out, Pelosi next president?, Pelosi set up?

This article will certainly be attacked by the unimaginative and the uniformed. However, the more I have watched this surreal soap opera play out, the more I have analyzed the happenings before and during the Democratic Convention, and evaluated the chances for Obama and Biden to be removed before or after election, the more I question Nancy Pelosi’s role and motives. Consider the following:

  • Nancy Pelosi was at the forefront of ramroding Obama through as the nominee. This was evident by multiple reports from Hillary supporters at the convention.
  • The Democrat Party has not vetted Obama and ignored the Philip J Berg lawsuit. Obama and the DNC must respond by today, September 24, 2008.
  • If the Berg lawsuit does not remove Obama in time for the election and Obama wins, he certainly will be removed from office for a variety of well documented reasons.
  • If Obama is removed before the election, the DNC has carte blanche to pick anyone they desire.
  • If Biden drops out before the election, the DNC can choose any replacement they desire.
  • Pelosi is third in line behind the VP per the US Constitution.

Pelosi is closer to becoming president than, perhaps, many of you believed or imagined.

If you are concerned about the chicanery from Obama and associates, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Larry Sinclair, State lawsuits, Minnesota, Sinclair to file in MN

The Philip J Berg lawsuit stating that Obama is not qualified to be president has been served on Obama, the DNC and the FEC. Obama must respond by September 24, 2008. Larry Sinclair has contacted Mr. Berg and plans to file suit in Minnesota. Here is Larry Sinclair’s statement:

“Monday, September 22, 2008

SUIT TO CHALLENGE OBAMA’S RIGHT TO BE ON MINNESOTA BALLOT

It appears that a civil suit will be filed in Minnesota State Court as well to challenge Barack Obama’s constitutional right to be on the Minnesota State Ballot in November.

I urge everyone to file legal challenge to Obama’s right to be on your states ballot as well, and do so now. The Defendants will be Barack Obama, your states Democratic Party and the Secretary of State for you state.

Until Obama has proven he is constitutionally entitled to be on the ballot on a federal level, he should not be on any state ballots and the states must determine if he is eligible for the state ballots. “

Read more here:
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/
Help insure that Obama will not be president:
http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama, Joe Biden, Rumors, Biden out?, Hillary in?, October 5, 2008, DNC sources, Washington insiders, Larry Sinclair, Philip J Berg, Obama not qualified, Obama indictment, Democrats, Feedback from public?

I am certain there is a  Shakespeare quote that applies and the John Edward’s affair was considered a rumor for quite a while.

I received an email today:

“Quote:

Let me share some info with you that I have gotten from excellent sources within the DNC: 

On or about October 5th, Biden will excuse himself from the ticket, citing health problems, and he will be replaced by Hillary. This is timed to occur after the VP debate on 10/2.”

Now consider the following:

Citizen Wells article September 12, 2008:

Last night I spoke to Larry Sinclair. He was given a heads up from some Washington insiders that he made contact with months ago. I was already aware of the insiders. I have discussed Joe Biden’s comments with bloggers and those around me. Even Rush Limbaugh has been raising questions about Biden. Here is the post I made last night:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-philip-j-berg-obama-lawsuit-biden-comments-larry-sinclair-hillary-replace-obama-hillary-replace-biden-did-biden-open-the-door-to-bow-out-biden-dropping-out/

I received an email this afternoon and here is a portion of it:

“We have received information from sources high in the Democratic Party that , in a total desperation move, Hillary Rodham Clinton will replace the hapless Joe Biden as V-P candidate on the Obama ticket.   I will send out more information on this in several minutes.   Hillary Clinton has said that Barack Obama is not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief.  He hasn’t grown any more qualified presumably in the past few weeks.  As the saying goes, “It took a Republican to have the Obama Dems name a woman to the ticket.”
 

 

 

Can this possibly be true?

Will Hillary replace Biden?

Is Obama qualified to be president?

Is Hillary posturing to replace Obama?

My God, this does sound like a soap opera!

I do not believe many Hillary supporters would back the ticket with her as VP. The damage may have already been done.

Are the Democrats testing the waters?

Citizen Wells article September 11, 2008:

However, there is another story that is connected to the Philip J
Berg lawsuit and other stories.

For several days, commenters on this blog, other bloggers and people
around me have been discussing Joe Biden and especially the comments
he recently made about Hillary Clinton. Is Joe Biden opening the
door to bow out? Was this part of a prearranged plan? Rush Limbaugh
claims to have predicted Biden’s actions for some time.

A few hours ago, I posted the following on twitter.com/citizenwells
and I did so without discussing it with Larry Sinclair. Here is what
I posted:

Option

1. Obama disqualified/indicted before election.

2. Obama disqualified/indicted after election, before oath of office.

3. Obama impeached/indicted after oath of office.

4. Obama loses (preferred). Hillary waits 4 years.

Hillary’s odds are good.

For months I have read hundreds of comments regarding the election
and I have come to the conclusion that there is something resembling
a collective consciousness occuring.

Larry Sinclair called me a few minutes ago about some information
he received and about conversations we had when he was in Washington
DC for the Democrats Meeting. (Clarification for MSM, ongoing
conversations occur when you follow a story). All I can say about
what he told me then is that it involved people connected to
Hillary. Larry told me he justed posted a new article and here it is:

“Thursday, September 11, 2008
IS JOE BIDEN GOING TO WITHDRAW FROM THE OBAMA TICKET TO MAKE ROOM FOR HILLARY?
Is Joe Biden going to withdraw from the Obama/Biden ticket to make room for Hillary Clinton?

Could some of my meetings and phone conversation while in DC in May and June of 2008 now being used to have Joe Biden withdraw for personal or medical reasons from the Democratic ticket, making way for Hillary Clinton? This is the feeling coming from some people and it would explain some high level contacts and communications in May and June while I was in DC.

Nothing would surprise me in the Obama camp and I can only say I hope that there is no truth to the emails I am receiving.”

Read more here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com

Honestly folks, With Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Reid running the Democrat Party, would anything surprise you?

A scarier thought just occurred to me. Did Nancy Pelosi push Obama through the DNC Convention knowing she had a shot at inheriting the presidency?

If you are tired of this nonsense and chicanery, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama, King of lies, diversions and deception, The View, Joy Behar, Politico blog, Politico reports lies, Personal attacks Hallmark of Obama camp

How does one talk about Obama without being negative?

Should we make ties to crime, corruption, anti Americanism,
anti semitism, terrorists, and constant lies positives?

Politico.com, the same blog that reported lies about Larry Sinclair
before, during and after his arrest at the National Press Club,
has the audacity to post an article questioning John McCain’s
honesty and uses “The View” as a source for the argument. Joy Behar
is quoted as saying “They’re lies,” in reference to comments made by the McCain campaign. This comes from a group of people that would
not know the truth if it bit them on the ass.

Most of the women on “The View” clearly have a left wing agenda
and if Politico is not being paid by the Obama camp, you wouldn’t
know it. Think about it, Obama, the most documented liar that
has ever run for office (this includes court testimony) is given a
free ride and John McCain, who is known for his integrity and sense
of fairness, is being attacked. No surprise. That is the hallmark
of the Obama campaign and Politico and “The View” are an integral
part of the Obama Campaign. Here are some exerpts from the Politico
article:

“Why McCain is going so negative, so often
By JONATHAN MARTIN | 9/13/08 7:10 AM EST”

“John McCain has essentially claimed he’s savaged Obama because the Illinois senator wouldn’t agree to the series of town hall meetings McCain proposed.”

“It’s hard to imagine a more unlikely perch for John McCain to be shamed for his increasingly hard-edged and truth-stretching campaign than the middle seat on “The View.”

Yet on Friday morning, there sat the Republican nominee – a politician who has built an all but saintly reputation for “straight talk” over the years – caught in a vise between Joy Behar and Barbara Walters and getting a lecture from each on honesty.

“They’re lies,” Behar said of two recent lines of attack from the McCain campaign”

“McCain’s tactics are drawing the scorn of many in the media and organizations tasked with fact-checking the truthfulness of campaigns. In recent weeks, Team McCain has been described as dishonorable, disingenuous and downright cynical.”

“The negative and often exaggerated or misleading claims being made about Obama and Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, especially those playing on Palin’s gender, are just too irresistible for the process-consumed online and cable news media that now drives the campaign conversation, Weaver said.”

Read more here:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13412.html

So, to sum this up, Obama lies, attacks, has more baggage that a 747 and if anyone questions that, they are attacking or telling lies?

Does that make sense to you?

Boycott the sponsors of “The View”. Send a message you do not approve of their tactics.

If this worries you, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Hillary replaces Biden, Biden steps down, Obama next?, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama not qualified, Obama indictment, Soap Opera?, Can Democrats survive Drama?

Last night I spoke to Larry Sinclair. He was given a heads up from some Washington insiders that he made contact with months ago. I was already aware of the insiders. I have discussed Joe Biden’s comments with bloggers and those around me. Even Rush Limbaugh has been raising questions about Biden. Here is the post I made last night:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-philip-j-berg-obama-lawsuit-biden-comments-larry-sinclair-hillary-replace-obama-hillary-replace-biden-did-biden-open-the-door-to-bow-out-biden-dropping-out/

I received an email this afternoon and here is a portion of it:

“We have received information from sources high in the Democratic Party that , in a total desperation move, Hillary Rodham Clinton will replace the hapless Joe Biden as V-P candidate on the Obama ticket.   I will send out more information on this in several minutes.   Hillary Clinton has said that Barack Obama is not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief.  He hasn’t grown any more qualified presumably in the past few weeks.  As the saying goes, “It took a Republican to have the Obama Dems name a woman to the ticket.”

 

 

Can this possibly be true?

Will Hillary replace Biden?

Is Obama qualified to be president?

Is Hillary posturing to replace Obama?

My God, this does sound like a soap opera! 

I do not believe many Hillary supporters would back the ticket with her as VP. The damage may have already been done.

Are the Democrats testing the waters?

Obama not US citizen, McCain is US citizen, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama not Qualified, US Code: Title 8, Section 1403, McCain is qualified

 Philip J Berg filed a lawsuit in Philadephia Federal Court, and it
has been served on Barack Obama, DNC and FEC. The basis of the suit
is Obama:
Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia

Many commenters on this blog and throughout the country are confused about the laws regarding eligibility to be president and some believe that McCain is not eligible. He clearly is. However, the same is not true for Obama. It is apparent that Obama was born in Kenya. 

The following was posted by Leeballz, a regular commenter on Citizen Wells. I would like to thank Leeballz again for all the help provided.

“Apparently I can’t post this enough:

US Code: Title 8, Section 1403.

Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904

(a) Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.

(b) Any person born in the Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States employed by the Government of the United States or by the Panama Railroad Company, or its successor in title, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1403.html

Michael,

You are right that if Obama was born in Hawaii that he would be eligible. If he was borne outside of the U.S. (or outside of any U.S. controlled areas abroad like military bases) he would not be. Unless of course there is a law that did give him eligibility if borne abroad; like his mother being able to transfer that right to him. However, if he was a citizen and he moved to another country and received citizenship there, then he would have dual citizenship. As I mentioned above, I don’t think dual citizenship would disqualify him. I have dual citizenship, but was borne not 20 miles from Washington, D.C. I believe I would be eligible if I wanted to run. Again, though if the country that he took up residence in, required him to denounce or revoke his U.S. citizenship and he never reinstated it (if that’s even possible), then we have a huge problem over a rather small technicality. The huge problem is called “Precedent.” The funny thing with it is if you set it, then it is very hard to get rid of. I don’t think this office is one that needs to cause a constitutional crisis or constitutional amendment for one candidate.

So I think this lawsuit should be an easy thing for Obama to settle and if so, then he will gain many more votes from it. He should be excited to prove his citizenship because of that reason, yet he hasn’t publicly challenged it except for a disputed birth certificate on an obscure website. Why? Why hasn’t he produced the records from the hospital, I would presume he could have gotten them on his vacation. However, those who wish to think negatively of him will still see the possibility of forgery, but he can then disprove that too if that is false.

Questions are good, they provide answers.”

From Obama not qualified for presidency lawsuit, Philip J Berg, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, September 10, 2008, SEEKS DEPOSITION OF BARACK OBAMA AND HOWARD DEAN BY END OF MONTH, Jeff Schreiber explains, 2008/09/12 at 12:51 PM

Read all about the Philip J Berg lawsuit here:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/philip-j-berg-lawsuit/

Visit Philip J Berg’s website:

http://www.obamacrimes.com