Tag Archives: US District Court

Tony Rezko status hearing, August 11, 2011, Judge Amy J. St. Eve, US District Court

Tony Rezko status hearing, August 11, 2011, Judge Amy J. St. Eve, US District Court

Tony Rezko, convicted of corruption in June of 2008, has a status hearing with  Judge Amy J. St. Eve in US District Court on August 11, 2011.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Honorable Amy J. St. Eve                    Courtroom 1241 (ASE)         

1:05-cr-00691   USA v. Rezko                           09:00   Status Hearing             

http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/DailyCal/1.htm#St.Eve

Taitz v Obama, Update, January 28, 2010, US District Court, Washington DC, Summons issued, CASE #: 1:10-cv-00151-RCL

Just in from Charles Kerchner of another case, Kerchner v Obama & Congress.

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-00151-RCL

TAITZ v. OBAMA
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
 Case: 1:09-mc-00346-RCL

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Date Filed: 01/27/2010
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

 
Plaintiff 
ORLY TAITZ represented byORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
 
Date Filed#Docket Text
01/27/20101  COMPLAINT against BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616027174) filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
01/27/2010  SUMMONS (3) Issued as to BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (rdj) (Entered: 01/28/2010)

 
1:10-cv-00151-RCL TAITZ v. OBAMA
Royce C. Lamberth, presiding
Date filed: 01/27/2010
Date of last filing: 01/27/2010
 
Case Summary
Office: Washington, DC     Filed: 01/27/2010
Jury Demand: None     Demand:
Nature of Suit: 890     Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant     Disposition:
County: 88888Terminated:
Origin: 1    Reopened:

Lead Case: None
Related Case: 1:09-mc-00346-RCLOther Court Case: None
Def Custody Status:
Flags: PROSE-NP, TYPE-F

 
Plaintiff: ORLY TAITZ
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Judge Clay D Land ruling, September 16, 2009, Captain Connie Rhodes, Orly Taitz, Motion for temporary restraining order, Motion denied, US District Court, Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel, Garrison Commander Fort Benning, Judge Land uninformed, Biased?, US Constitution, Oath of office, Treason?

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
So help me God.”
US Military officer’s oath of office


Officers in the service of the United States are
bound by this oath to disobey any order that
violates the Constitution of the United States.

 

To:

Judge Clay D. Land, US District Judge

Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel, Garrison Commander Fort Benning

Is there any reason that I and the American public should not consider you cowards, un American or guilty of treason?

You both have taken oaths to defend the US Constitition against enemies, both foreign and domestic.

The motion made by Connie Rhodes, Captain, is not about the beliefs of her legal counsel, Orly Taitz, it is about the refusal of the usurper, Barack Obama, to prove that he is eligible to be president. The very fact that Obama has gone to such lengths to avoid proving he is a natural born citizen, should be enough to raise many large red flags.

The motion of Captain Connie Rhodes, an active military officer, who apparently takes her oath to defend the US Constitution, very seriously, was flawed. Of course, every motion, every pleading before any court in this nation is flawed. This is not a perfect world. Judge Land has made a ruling not based on merits, not based on facts and apparently, with malice aforethought, for reasons unknown. Judge Clay D. Land, a US District Court judge, has denied Captain Rhodes’ motion on September 16, 2009. The motion was for a temporary restraining order to prevent her pending deployment to Iraq based on the fact that the orders and any future orders come from an illegal, usurper Commander in Chief, Obama.

Judge Land has referred to this motion as frivolous. Based on the following, Judge Land should minimally be subject to judicial review.

I can state with certainty that the following is true:

  • We are in the middle of the Constitutional crisis foretold by attorney Philip J Berg in 2008.
  • Barack Hussein Obama is not President of the United States.
  • Obama is by any reasonable definition a usurper.
  • Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States.
  • Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore a British citizen.
  • There is absolutely no evidence that Obama was born in the US.
  • There is much compelling evidence that Obama does not have a long form birth certificate proving eligibility.
  • Obama has expended enormous resources to hide his past and associated documents that would clear up eligibility.
  • Barack Obama signed a form in Arizona before the primaries stating that he was a natural born citizen.
  • Barack Obama has kept hidden all documents recording his past except for a few notable exceptions such as his IL bar application. Obama lied on his bar application regarding his numerous traffic tickets and aliases.
  • Commander Walter Fitzpatrick (Ret.) and other military officers have charged Obama with treason.
  • By all indications, Captain Connie Rhodes is following her oath to defend the US Constituton.

Consider the following exerpts from Judge Land’s ruling:

“Plaintiff alleges that her deployment orders are unconstitutional and unenforceable because President Barack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to act as Commander in Chief of the United States armed forces. After conducting a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are frivolous.”

Judge Land, you are either uninformed, complicit in treason or incompetent.

“Plaintiff’s counsel speculates that President Obama was not born in the United States based upon the President’s alleged refusal to disclose publicly an “official birth certificate” that is satisfactory to Plaintiff’s counsel and her followers. She therefore seeks to have the judiciary compel the President to produce “satisfactory” proof that he was born in the United States. Counsel makes these allegations although a “short-form” birth certificate has been made publicly available which indicates that the President was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961.3
3 The court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in
a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than
eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. See
Federal Election Commission, Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign
Disbursements Dec. 31, 2008, http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/
20090608Pres/3_2008PresPrimaryCmpgnDis.pdf (last visited Sept. 15, 2009).
Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who
received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the
President. Press Release, Federal Election Commission, 2008 Presidential
Campaign Financial Activity Summarized (June 8, 2009), available at
http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608PresStat.shtml. It would
appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would
support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office
he sought.
Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is
qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings,
and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has
rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.
See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0,
the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th
President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August
4, 1961”).”

There is no alleged refusal to disclose an “official birth certificate.” Obama has gone to great lengths to avoid this. Judge Land, if you have a legitimate copy, please share it.
A short form birth certificate has not been produced. Even Lou Dobbs of CNN was able to discern that the document produced by the Obama camp, a COLB, Certification of live birth, is just a document referring to another document and we have no proof that the COLB is genuine.

Judge Land, and/or his assistants, reveal ignorance about the vetting process and are complicit with Congress in this coverup.

“Moreover, mere allegations of a constitutional violation unsupported by a reasonable factual foundation are insufficient to warrant judicial review. To hold otherwise would be to create chaos within the military decision-making process and chain of command. As explained below, the Court must balance several factors to determine whether judicial review of a military decision is authorized.”

Judge Land, all we have are allegations that Obama is qualified to be president. We have a constitutional crisis caused by the deceit of Obama and non vetting by the Democrat party.

“She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated,
conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States.

Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is “an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.” (Compl. ¶ 21.) She continues with bare, conclusory allegations that the President is “an alien, possibly even an unnaturalized or even an unadmitted illegal alien . . . without so much as lawful residency in the United States.” (Id. ¶ 26.) Then, implying that the President is either a wandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President “might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President.” (Id. ¶ 110 (emphasis added).

Acknowledging the existence of a document that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that the document “cannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.””

Once again, Judge Land exhibits ignorance of the facts. The only document that the Obama camp has produced is a COLB that has not been proven to be legitimate.

“As explained previously, Plaintiff has demonstrated no likelihood of success on the merits. Her claims are based on sheer
conjecture and speculation.”

Conjecture?

Judge Land, you are the one guilty of conjecture.
Judge Land, you have taken a similar oath one or more times. Do you take this oath seriously?

Her likelihood for success is only limited by your bias and lack of knowledge.

Colonel Thomas D MacDonald, are we to believe that you take your oath to defend the US Constitution seriously?

I understand that the court must weigh interfering with the Military. But this goes to the core of military rule and order, having a  Commander in Chief who is legitimate.

I do not criticize Judge Land for his comments on how the case was plead, however, given the serious nature of the motion, I do criticize Judge Land for calling this a frivolous motion and accusing the plaintiff of conjecture when most of his basis for attacking Captain Rhodes’ position was based on conjecture and misinformation.

Judge Land referring to concerned American patriots as “birthers” is condescending, uninformed and unacceptable.

It is apparent that of the three major players in this motion, Captain Rhodes, Judge Land and Colonel MacDonald, Captain Rhodes is the only one that lives out her oath to defend the US Constitution.

I am shocked and infuriated by the attitude of Judge Clay D Land and believe that his actions should be investigated.

Citizen Wells

Philip J Berg, Press Release, February 13, 2009, Expose Obama, Obama not qualified, US Constitution, Obama not eligible, Status of cases, Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, US District Court, Hollister vs. Soetoro, Spread the word

Press release from Philip J Berg, dated February 13, 2009:

“02/13/09: PRESS RELEASE – Berg Fighting On – 3 Pending Lawsuits to
Expose Obama for “not” being Constitutionally “qualified/eligible” to be President
and Berg requests help to spread the word as the major media refuses

(Contact information and PDF at end)

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 02/13/09) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama announced today the request to his supporters to spread the word as the major media continues to refuse to cover this story – the most significant story in the history of our country; the biggest “HOAX” perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office.
Berg’s request: “I hereby request all of obamacrimes.com supporters to (1) go to your computers; (2) send a message to everyone on ‘your address’ book to go to obamacrimes.com and read it; (3) ask everyone on ‘their address’ book to read and send on to everyone on their address book; and (4) if they can, make a contribution to obamacrimes.com [on our web site to donate online or mail in]. I am requesting donations of asking four [4] friends to contribute $15.00 each or donate $60.00 themselves as this is the seventh [7th] month that we are pursuing this effort to expose Obama’s ‘HOAX’ and we are preparing to proceed with discovery [interrogatories, request for production of documents, subpoenaing of documents, depositions of Obama & Howard Dean, etc.].

I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama ‘HOAX,’ and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama ‘HOAX,’ that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally ‘qualified/eligible’ to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) ‘Birth Certificate;’ that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his ‘adopted’ name of ‘Barry Soetoro’ from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his office of President of the United States.”

Berg concluded, “I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President.”

Status of Cases:

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09
Waiting for Response Briefs from Obama, DNC and the other Defendants (Appellees)

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254
Berg filed 1st Amended Complaint for Hollister on 2/09/09
after Soetoro/Obama and Biden filed Motion to Dismiss

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire           

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12                                                     
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
               (610) 825-3134        
(800) 993-PHIL  [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell                (610) 662-3005        

philjberg@obamacrimes.com    ”

 

Complaint against Barack Obama, US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Obama is not a natural born citizen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE :

:

Plaintiff

 

:

vs.

 

: CIVIL ACTION NO

.

:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM, THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION AND :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE ::

Defendants

 

:

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARTORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states in particular part, “No Person

except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption

of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person

be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and

been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Furthermore, all Presidents

since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States subsequent to the

Declaration of Independence.

2. “The general doctrine of our Constitution is, that the executive power of the nation is

vested in the President; subject only to the exceptions and qualifications, which are

expressed in the instrument.” 7 Works of Alexander Hamilton, J. C. Hamilton ed. (New

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

1

York: 1851), 76, 80–81 (emphasis in original), U.S. Constitution, Article II (Hamilton and

Madison.)

3. Obama is a representative of the Democratic People. However, the Obama must meet the

Qualifications specified for the United States Office of the President, which is he must be

a “natural born” citizen. Unfortunately, Obama is not a “natural born” citizen. Just to

name one of the problems, Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an

Indonesian citizen and relocated herself and Obama to Indonesia wherein Obama’s

mother naturalized in Indonesia and Obama followed her naturalization, as he was a

minor and in the custody of his mother. Obama failed to take the oath of allegiance when

he turned eighteen (18) years to regain his United States Citizenship status.

4. The Democratic National Committee is for Plaintiff and “We the People” who believe in

the Democratic Vision. The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent the

Democratic Americans in seeking honest leadership, Open Government, Real Security,

Energy Independence, Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare

System that works for Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is

supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing

personal liberties for all. Of which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the

Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified

and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States

Constitution.

5. The actions of Obama, a U.S. Senator, in running for President of the United States,

knowing he is not eligible, have been taken entirely without authorization under the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

2

United States Constitution, completely ignoring the qualification and procedures created

by the United States Constitution he is purporting to enforce.

6. Should Obama become the Nominee of the Democratic Party and then be discovered by

virtue of malfeasance, or negligence, on his part not to have revealed material evidence

showing him to be Ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America

and thereby his Nomination be declared void by the appropriate Authorities Acting under

the Law, Plaintiff as well as other Democratic Americans will suffer Irreparable Harm

including but not limited to:

A) Functional, or Actual, Disenfranchisement of large numbers of Citizens,

being members of the Democratic Party, who would have been

deprived of the ability to choose a Nominee of their liking;

B) Irreparable Harm to the structure and integrity of the Democratic Party

and the Democratic National Committee. In turn, this too would lead to

Disenfranchisement; and

C) A severe and genuine likelihood of Civil Disturbance by virtue of reaction

to said Disenfranchisement.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

7. This case arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and presents a

federal question within this Court’s jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and

28 U.S.C. § 1331.

8. This Court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment

Act, 28 U.S. C. § 2201.

9. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

3

PARTIES

10. Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”], is an adult individual

with a business address of 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA

19444-2531.

11. Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham [hereinafter “Obama” is an adult individual

with an office address of 713 Hatch, Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.

12. Obama, The Democratic National Committee (hereinafter referred to as “DNC”) is a

Corporation with a principal address of 430 S. Capitol Street SE, Washington, DC

20003.

13. Defendant, The Federal Election Commission (FEC) was created in 1975 by Congress

to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). The FEC is a

Governmental Agency with a principal address of 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC

20463.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

14. Since the beginning of the U.S. Constitution, in order to run for Office of the President,

you must be a “natural born citizen” and you may not hold dual citizenship or multiple

citizenships with foreign Countries. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

15. There are questions as to where Obama was actually born, in the United States or abroad

and then registered his birth. There are further questions regarding Obama’s United

States Citizenship, if he ever held such, being expatriated and his failure to regain his

citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance once he turned eighteen (18) years of age.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

4

There are additional questions regarding Obama’s multi citizenships with foreign

countries, which he still maintains. To date, Obama has refused to prove he is qualified

under the U.S. Constitution and his eligibility to run as President of the United States.

16. The facts are undisputed by Obama that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a U.S.

Citizen however, his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a Citizen of Kenya. Obama’s

parents, according to divorce records, were married on or about February 2, 1961.

17. Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961; however, has never

given the name of the hospital he was born in; whereas Obama’s grandmother on his

father’s side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya. Reports

reflect Obama’s mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was

prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy,

which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight. Stanley Ann

Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and

registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or

about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

18. Upon investigation into the birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii,

Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital

and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version under the subject “Barack Obama”

states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version under the

subject “Queens Hospital” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.

19. There are further references circulating on the internet claiming examination of the

hospital’s records in Hawaii show no birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama),

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

5

Obama’s mother. However, there are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about

August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

20. Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal was a contributing writer and published

an article on June 9, 2008 stating the GOP sent a research team to Mombasa, Kenya and

located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity Hospital,

to his father, a Kenyan Citizen and his mother, a U.S. Citizen.

21. At the time of Obama’s birth in 1961, Kenya was a British Colony.

22. There is a Canadian Birth Certificate posted on the Internet in the name of Barack

Hussein Obama, Jr.; however, the date of birth shows to be August 23, 1961.

23. Under the Independence Constitution of Kenya, Obama became a Kenyan citizen on

December 12, 1963. Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy

Martin states Obama has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship. Andy Martin further

states on Obama’s Senate web site, Obama tap dances around his own dual nationality

when discussing his father. Obama obviously knows, because his father told the Obama,

that he (Obama) also held/holds Kenyan nationality.

24. If in fact Obama was born in Kenya, the laws on the books at the time of his birth stated

if a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his

mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother would have had to live ten (10) years in

the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of

Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the

residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship. The

laws in effect at the time of Obama’s birth prevented U.S. Citizenship at birth of children

born abroad to a U.S. Citizen parent and a non-citizen parent, if the citizen parent was

under the age of nineteen (19) at the time of the birth of the child. Obama’s mother did

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

6

not qualify under the law on the books to register Obama as a “natural born” citizen.

Section 301(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163,

235, 8 U.S.C. §1401(b), Matter of S-F- and G-, 2 I & N Dec. 182 (B.I.A.) approved

(Att’y Gen. 1944). Obama would have only been naturalized and a Naturalized citizen is

not qualified and/or eligible to run for Office of the President. U.S. Constitution, Article

II, Section I, Clause 4.

25. Furthermore, if Obama had been born in Kenya, his birth father Barack Obama, Sr. was a

citizen of Kenya; therefore, Obama would have automatically become a citizen of Kenya.

26. In or about 1967, when Obama was approximately six (6) years old, his mother, Stanley

Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and moved to Indonesia with

Obama. At this time, if Obama was Registered as a “natural born” citizen, which he did

not qualify to be registered as, he would have lost his U.S. Citizenship when his mother

married Lolo Soetoro and took up residency in Indonesia. The first requirement is that

naturalization must be achieved through “application

 

.”

Such type of naturalization

occurs, for example, when a person acquires a foreign nationality by marriage to a

national of that country. Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b). Additionally, there is

rumor circulating on the Internet that his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted

Obama.

27. The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when the person became

naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody of such person.

Obama’s mother expatriated her U.S. Citizenship when she married Lolo Soetoro, a

citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

7

28. Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in

Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration where it clearly

states Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and lists his citizenship as Indonesian, Obama’s

father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of birth and place of birth are listed as

August 4, 1961 in Honolulu and Obama’s Religion is listed as Islam. This document was

verified by television show

 

Inside Edition

, whose reporter, Matt Meagher took the actual

footage of the school record.

29. In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10)

years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

30. Sometime after the return of Obama to Hawaii, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham

returned to Hawaii and divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro. At the time of Divorce,

Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham could have regained her U.S. Citizenship. In

order to regain her citizenship, Obama’s mother would have had to take the oath of

allegiance required. Such oath of allegiance may be taken abroad before a diplomatic or

consular officer of the United States, or in the United States before the Attorney General

or the judge or clerk of a Court. Such Oath of allegiance would have been entered in the

records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney General

and upon demand, a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath

administered, under the seal of the embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney

General shall be delivered. The certified copy shall be evidence of the facts stated therein

before any court of record or judicial tribunal and in any department or agency of the

Government of the United States. 8 U.S.C. §1435.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

8

31. As stated above, The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when

the person became naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody

of such person. Obama’s mother expatriated her U.S. Citizenship when she married Lolo

Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.

32. Obama’s mother failed to take the oath in order to regain her U.S. Citizenship.

Therefore, Obama would not have been able to regain his U.S. Citizenship until he turned

eighteen (18) years after he took the oath of allegiance before a diplomatic or consular

officer of the United States, or in the U.S. before the Attorney General or the judge or

clerk of court. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama failed to regain

his citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance. Since the oath of allegiance would have

been entered in the records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the

Attorney General, if Plaintiff is incorrect, then Obama should be able to produce in Court

a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath administered.

33. Investigation further showed in 1981, Obama traveled to Pakistan using his Indonesian

passport. At the time of travels to Indonesia, Obama was twenty (20) years old. He was

well aware he maintained his Indonesia citizenship, and failed to regain his United States

citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship. Had Obama regained his United

States citizenship, he would have been traveling on a United States Passport.

34. Obama and his Campaign office have been asked for Obama’s Certificate of Birth in

order to prove he is a “natural born” citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

9

35.

 

After many attempts of the public to obtain Obama’s Certificate of Birth, a Hawaiian

Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) was placed on Obama’s campaign website. However,

as posted all over the internet, three (3) independent Document Forensic Experts

performed extensive Forensic testing on the Certificate of Live Birth posted on Obama’s

campaign website. The Forensic Expert findings were the Certificate of Live Birth

(COLB) was in fact a forgery. It was further discovered that this original Certificate of

Live Birth which had been altered and forged was issued to Maya Kasandra Soetoro,

born in 1970. Maya Kasandra Soetoro is Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia

and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on

Obama’s website located at

 

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

36. Further investigation led to Obama’s State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary

Record. On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it

specifically asks for “Full former name(s). Obama put “None,” when in fact he went by

the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama. It is further believed Obama has used the

name Barry Dunham. Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the

penalty of perjury.

37. Even if Obama maintained his United States Citizenship, which he failed to do, he also

carries citizenships in Kenya and Indonesia. Obama has divided loyalties with foreign

countries. Thus, Obama carries multiple citizenships and is ineligible to run for President

of the United States. United States Constitution, Article II, Section I.

38. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because the Obama

cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

10

eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of their

citizen choice for the nomination.

39. Voters donated money, goods and services to select a nominee, and were defrauded by

Obama’s obfuscations. Obama clearly shows consciousness of guilt by his actions by

posting a forged birth certificate on his website, and by and the falsifications he told to

cover his loss of citizenship.

40. Obama proclaims himself a Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had

no eligibility to become President except by means of obfuscations and deceptions.

41. The injunctive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction defrauds

everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair representation

of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted, fraudulent

nomination process to continue.

42. It not only allows, but promotes an overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates

such a lack of confidence in voters of the primary process itself, so that it would cement a

prevailing belief that no potential candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect

our election process, follow the Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying

and defrauding voters to get onto the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they

fraudulently manage to get elected.

43. If declaratory and injunctive relief is not given, it would be extremely unfair to the

country for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question

as to the nominee’s eligibility to serve if elected.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

11

44. As stated above, Plaintiff as well as Democratic American Citizens will suffer Irreparable

Harm if Declaratory and Injunctive relief is not granted. Plaintiff does not have any other

way of redress regarding these very significant and important issues.

45. The DNC has failed Plaintiff and the Democratic American Citizens by their failure to

perform due diligence and inquire into Obama’s eligibility to run for Office of the

President.

COUNT ONE

VIOLATION OF THE

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,

ARTICLE II, SECTION I

46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 45 as if fully set forth herein.

47. The United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 4, Qualifications,

Office of President, states:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United

States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be

eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be

eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of

thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the

United States.”

48. Obama’s failure to maintain his United States Citizenship makes him ineligible

to run for Office of the President.

49. Obama, if born in Kenya would have made him a citizen of Kenya.

Furthermore, because of the 1940 Naturalization Act, June 1952, Obama’s

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

12

mother would have had to be nineteen (19) in order for Obama to be a

“natural born” United States citizenship upon registration of his birth.

Obama’s mother was only eighteen (18) when she birthed Obama and

therefore was not old enough to meet the residency requirements under our laws

at the time of Obama’s birth and be able to register her son’s birth as a

“natural born” citizen.

50. Even if Obama would have been able to be registered as a “natural born” citizen

in Hawaii, he lost his citizenship in the United States when his mother

married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and then took Obama to

Indonesia and set up residency with her new husband.

51. Obama’s mother could have regained her and Obama’s United States

Citizenship status when she divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved back

to Hawaii. However, in order to regain her citizenship in the United States she

would have had to take the oath of allegiance, which would have been recorded.

Obama’s mother never did take the oath of allegiance to regain her citizenship in

the United States.

52. Moreover, Obama could have regained his citizenship in the United States when

he turned eighteen (18), again by taking the oath of allegiance that would have

been recorded. However, Obama failed to do so.

53. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the

Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the

President under the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

13

qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire

into Obama’s eligibility status.

54. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately supply a

certified copy of his oath of allegiance proving he regained his United States

Citizenship. In addition, Obama needs to furnish a certified copy of his

Certificate of Live Birth to further prove he was born in Hawaii as he claims.

However, if Obama is unable to supply a certified record of his oath of

allegiance, he needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for

President.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

14

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

COUNT TWO

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

55. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully set forth herein.

56. From the beginning of our Constitution, our forefathers inferred a person running

for Office of the President could not have divided loyalties. This was a result of

people coming from England to the United States who owed loyalties to both

England and the United States. Our forefather’s did not want a person with dual

loyalties to be able to secure the position as President of the United States.

57. This inference is taken from Article II, Section I, which plainly states

qualifications for Office of the President must be a “natural born” citizen.

58. The United States President cannot run our Country and have responsibilities

and obligations owed to other countries.

59. Obama is not eligible to run for Office of the United States President as his

mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, a citizen

of Indonesia, when Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his

United States Citizenship when he turned eighteen (18). Therefore, Obama is not

a “natural born” citizen.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

15

60. Furthermore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does

not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at

which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a

United States Passport.

61. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision

and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the

qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire

into Obama’s eligibility status.

62. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down

and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

16

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

COUNT THREE

FRAUD

63. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 62 as if fully set forth herein.

64. Obama committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American Citizens by running

for President claiming to be eligible knowing he was not eligible as a result of

his failure to regain his United States Citizenship and by maintaining multi

citizenships with Kenya and Indonesia.

65. Obama further committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American people by

falsifying information on his Illinois State Bar Registration and Public

Disciplinary Record. Obama stated on his Application to the State Bar of

Illinois, as proven by the Illinois State Bar Registration and Disciplinary

Record, stating he never used any other names. Obama signed his

application/registration for the Illinois State Bar under the penalty of perjury

knowing the information to be false. The fact of the matter is Obama used the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

17

name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia and was registered as a citizen of Indonesia on

his school records. Obama further used the name Barry Obama and it is further

believed Obama used the name Barack and/or Barry Dunham.

66. Obama attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American people by allowing an

altered and forged Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) to be placed on his

campaign website. Obama was well aware the Government issued COLB was altered

and forged as the original document was in the name of

 

Maya Kasandra Soetoro born

in 1970. Maya Kassandra Soetoro Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia

and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on

Obama’s campaign website located at

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

67. Obama further attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American People by

claiming to be a United States Citizen, knowing this information to be false.

Obama is well aware when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of

Indonesia and took up residency in Indonesia with Obama, they both

naturalized in Indonesia expatriating their United States Citizenship. Obama’s

mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, when

Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his United States

Citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance, which is recorded when he turned

eighteen (18) years.

68. Furthermore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does

not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at

69.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

18

which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a

United States passport.

70. Moreover, as stated above, Obama was registered in School in Jakarta,

Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, born in 1961 in Hawaii and his

religion was registered as Islam.

71. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the

Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the

President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC

has failed to inquire into Obama’s eligibility status.

72. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down

and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

19

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Philip J. Berg

___________________________

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in

 

Pro Se

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Identification No. 09867

(610) 825-3134

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

20

, , ,

Obama citizenship, Federal Court challenging Barack Obama’s qualifications to be President, US District Court, Eastern District of PA , PHILIP J. BERG, Complaint filed

We were given a heads up earlier that a complaint was being filed in US District Court, Eastern District of PA. The complaint is a follows: “for an emergency temporary restraining order prohibiting Obama from running for president, and enjoining the DNC from nominating Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate.”

The Texas Darlin blog has an update:

“This is the information I have received as of 5:28 PM EST:

Papers have been filed, not yet scanned into the Pacer system.

The complaint is asking for declaratory (asking the court to declare Obama is not a US citizen, a “natural born” citizen and not eligible under the qualifications of the US Constitution to run for Office of President).

Also asking for injunctive relief and an emergency TRO. Further asking for EXPEDITED Discovery.

We are asking that Obama provide a “ceritified copy” of the oath he took to regain his citizenship.
We are asking for court orders, ordering the state department, HI department of records and other governmental agencies to turn over any and everything on Obama, all certified.

Plaintiff: PHILIP J. BERG”

To read more and keep up to date on this development visit:

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/