Tag Archives: October 9

Judge grants request for Amicus Curiae Brief filing, Obama eligibility, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, Citizen Wells open thread, October 9, 2010

Judge grants request for Amicus Curiae Brief filing, Obama eligibility, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli

From The Post & Email October 8, 2010.
“Last March The Post & Email reported on an “Admission of Ineligibility” declared by a Florida man after he charged Barack Hussein Obama with “negligence” for failing to answer his request that Obama prove he is a natural born Citizen and therefore qualified to hold the office of President of the United States.

Mr. W. Spencer Connerat III, the author of the document which he deemed a “confession,” had originally sent it to the attorneys general of Florida and Virginia last March in the likely event that either or both of them decided to file a lawsuit over the impending passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).  Some have referred to the legislation as “Obamacare,” and its constitutionality has been debated since long before its passage.

Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia, filed suit against Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius directly after the legislation was passed by Congress on March 23, 2010.  A group of more than 20 states filed a similar lawsuit led by Attorney General Bill McCollum of Florida.”

“On September 21, 2010, Judge Hudson granted Mr. Connerat’s motion to file an Amicus Curiae brief to be included in the Virginia lawsuit along with many others filed by interested parties, including Physician Hospitals of America, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III, and the American Civil Rights Union.”

 Read more:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/10/08/judge-grants-request-to-file-amicus-curiae-brief-nullifying-health-care-bill-on-grounds-of-obamas-ineligibility/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/38601003/CONNERAT-OBAMA-Confession-FILED-in-Federal-Court

Thanks to commenter TruthSeeker

Leo Haffey, Update, October 9, 2009, Political prisoner, Nashville TN corruption, Judge Gloria Dumas, Suspicious affidavits, Obama thugs, Grand Jury indictments, Disciplinary Counsel for the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary

***  Update below  ***

I received this in an email on Thursday, August 27, 2009, 12:38 PM

“obama co-conspirators. Charges should be brought against bo & his co-conspirators in every State in the USA. Then bo etc. can be prosecuted criminally and civilly. I have the Brief to get it before SCOTUS upon Original Jurisdiction.
 
Leo Haffey”

I posted this in an article on September 29, 2009

I do want to make the following crystal clear:

“To Nashville and Tennessee courts and politicians and the Obama camp. We are watching you. If there is the hint of inpropriety in regard to justice and the treatment of attorney Leo Haffey, we will find out, report this to the entire world and descend upon you with righteous indignation and legal recourse such as you could not imagine in your wildest dreams. Clear?”

Update, Friday, October 9, 2009 11:00 AM ET:

 

Now, with what I know about the charges that were filed against attorney Leo Haffey, the harrassment of and pressure placed on the Haffey family, the formal charges recently filed against Haffey’s hearing judge, Gloria Dumas by the TN Judiciary Committee, the suspicious affidavits that were filed against Haffey and other details, I am outraged.

I contacted the Nashville District Attorney’s office several days ago and contacted the recipient of a request for investigation. She could not talk to me. Her boss has not returned the call.

Yesterday, Thursday, October 8, 2009, I spoke to the office of Joseph S. Daniel of the  Disciplinary Counsel for the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary, and left a message for him to call me. As of 11:00 AM ET, today, Friday, October 9, 2009, I have received no call.

It is clear that Leo Haffey did not receive a fair hearing. Allowing the recusal of Judge Gloria Dumas is not enough. At the very least, Leo Haffey should immediately receive a new hearing and be released on bond.

Reported here on September 29, 2009

“Think UR safe N US?
I was arrested 4 times without probable cause & imprisoned at Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute. I’m a Lawyer who knows his rights so I forced the “doctors” to release me, but if they can arrest a lawyer without probable cause and falsely imprison him in Nashville, merely because the lawyer was speaking out against Obama, imagine what Obama’s goons will do to the average American who speaks out.”
Citizen Wells vow to get the facts

Fellow blogger, Aristotle The Hun, has been in constant contact with Leo Haffey and his family and provided some background information from Leo Haffey: 

“Excerped Notes From Leo’s Jail Letters
Sept 28-29, 2009
Admittedly I am in a minimum security cell block, but I only see a handful of the 50+ who deserve to be in Prison. Far too many are falsely accused and many other simply have mental problems that make it impossible for them to navigate the Helter-Skelter Brothers Johnson “judicial” system. I trust that good Patriotic Americans like the 2 million who marched on DC on 9/12 will be appalled by what they see of Brothers, Johnson, Dean & Serpas. As I have always said, the seemingly petty crimes of the crooked politicians of Nashville will make Watergate look like an insignificance. Can you imaging the audacity of letting the BO campaign steal computers from the Nashville Election Commission and then covering it up, not to mention covering up for the child molesters at Al Farooq? Keep the Faith! Leo

I am shocked at the level of corruption in the “legal” system in Nashville. I never dreamed it was this bad. The Duke Lacrosse case pales in comparison and the North Carolina Supreme Court did the right thing, and disbarred DA Nifong. It is so perverse and entrenched here that the reckoning will be very long and messy and don’t have time for it. If I had known 25 yrs ago what I know now, I would never have moved here.”

“Sept 30, 2009

Let me emphasize again that the Nashville Judicial System is a Mother Lode for lawsuits for malicious prosecution cases. I am collecting names of other individuals who are innocent and being maliciously prosecuted by the DA, Torry Johnson. As you know, Johnson refused to prosecute known child molesters who were associated with the BO campaign in Nashville. Yet he prosecutes innocent men, based upon false accusations by disreputable people. Also he is covering up for the theft of two computers from the Nashville election commission by the BO campaign…

… The tipping point seemed to e when I wrote about Citizen Grand Juries and exposed DA Torry Johnson’s cover up of Sex Crimes at Al Farooq. Despite all the hardship that has befallen me, I am glad that I spoke out for a peaceful revolution for our Legal Systems. I have just now realized how horribly corrupt the Legal System is.”

“Oct 6, 2009 Sam speaks: We got a call today from Leo in prison saying he received notification that they will not deliver any of his mail to him. Thus far he has been able to send mail, which has been stamped “unopened.””
Leo Haffey reveals corruption in Nashville and why he is a political prisoner

Three very suspicious affidavits and a judge investigated for illegal activities and unprofessional behaviour.
“This whole matter has smelled badly from the beginning and now smells even more. I am presenting below some documents and information on this case that will help clarify it.

Three affidavits below echo what I was initially told, that the incidents involved neighbors and that no one was hurt. It never made sense that Leo Haffey was held on no bond under these circumstances. It makes less sense now unless the judge who was apparently recused was indeed biased, politically motivated or very misinformed. I do know that Leo Haffey was evaluated soon after his arrrest and found to be no harm to himself. He also is being held in a minimum security facility.”
Charges filed against Leo Haffey – why no bond?

Formal charges were filed against Judge Gloria Dumas on September 21, 2009 by the TN Judiciary

“1. Following a full investigation authorized under the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated 9 17-5-304(b)(3), the three judge investigative panel composed of the Honorable Pamela Reeves, the Honorable Jean A. Stanley, and the Honorable Dwight E. Stokes found, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated 5 17-5-304(d)(2)(A), that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Honorable Gloria Dumas has committed judicial offenses alleged herein in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated 5 17-5-302, and directed disciplinary counsel to file formal charges pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 17 -5-304(d)(2) (A).”
Leo Haffey hearing judge subject of TN Judicial formal complaint

We are not trying to prejudge the trial of Leo Haffey. We are not presuming guilt or innocence. What we are asking for is justice.

Attorney Leo Haffey deserves a fair hearing and release on bond.

For more information on the progress of this travesty of justice check back here

And

http://freeleohaffey.blogspot.com/

***  UPDATE – October 9, 2009  3:45 PM ET ***

Over the past hour I have had 2 conversations with TN judicial and prosecutors offices.

3:04 PM – Mr. Joseph S. Daniels returned my call from this morning. I discussed the formal complaint against Judge Gloria Dumas and asked if there was any procedure to protect defendants who are affected by her recent rulings. There is none. I explained my reason for calling and asked if he was familiar with the Leo Haffey case. He was not. He suggested that a complaint form be filled out. I would like to thank Mr. Daniels for returning my call.

3:25 PM – I received a call back from the Nashville District Attorney’s office, press liason. I mentioned the formal complaint lodged against Judge Dumas. She was not aware of it. They, of course, cannot discuss the details of pending cases. I expressed my deep concern that Leo Haffey did not receive a fair hearing from this apparently biased judge. I also referred to the suspicious affidavits that were filed and the request for an investigation that was sent to the DA’s office. The lady I spoke to was friendly and indicated she also wants justice to be served. I urged her to read the formal complaint lodged against Judge Dumas. I would like to thank the DA’s office for returning my call.

Citizen Wells comment – I do not know how other jurisdictions handle such situations, but I think this is a sad state of affairs when the public is not more protected by judicial misconduct.

Jerome Corsi, Philip J Berg, Tony Rezko, John Murtagh, MommaE Blog Talk Radio, Thursday night, October 9, 2008

MommaE Blog Talk Radio Tonight:

Please post this on as many Blogs as you can and e-mail it to everyone you know!
 
I will be talking about  Phil Berg’s case against Obama!  We will also be talking about Tony Rezko and the John Murtagh.
 
I hope that you will all join me on the show this afternoon.  Link, show times and call in number is below!
 
We will be talking about Obama throwing the Media under the  Bus, Corsi and there will be SOME CALLS TO ACTION TO GET OUT THE VOTE AMD MAKE SURE IT IS NOT FOR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
Show Times:
 
5:30 PM Pacific Time
 
6:30 PM Mountain Time
 
7:30 PM Central Time
 
8:30 Eastern Time
 
Call In Number:  347-237-4870
 

MommaE

Larry Sinclair live Florida radio interview, Thursday, October 9, 2008, 8:30 – 11:00 PM Eastern Time, Take it to the Streets Tour, Obama, November 1999, Donald Young

Larry Sinclair will give a live radio interview from Florida tonight, Thursday, October 9, 2008. Larry Sinclair is on his Take it to the Streets Tour to tell his story of a drug and sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Sinclair will also share his knowledge of Donald Young, the gay choir director at TUCC, who was murdered in December 2007 and also inform the public about the Philip J Berg lawsuit.

Check back here tonight for details of the radio interview.

* Update *

I tuned in to the show and it does not meet my minimum standards for quality. The language was repulsive and I draw the line there.

To read more from Larry Sinclair and contribute to his tour, visit:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com

Berg Response to Defense Motion for Protective Order, Jeff Schreiber explanation, October 9, 2008, Obama’s citizenship, constitutional requirements for the presidency, Obama campaign donations

Philip J Berg filed a motion in federal court today, Thursday, October 9, 2008 to dismiss the motion from Obama and the DNC to stay discovery until after the judge rules on a defense motion to dismiss. Jeff Schreiber, a law student, legal writer and blog owner has provided an explanation of Mr. Berg’s motion. Here are some exerpts:

“This morning, Philadelphia attorney Philip Berg filed a response in opposition to the motion for protective order, a measure intended to stay discovery until after the judge rules on a defense motion to dismiss, filed by Barack Obama and the DNC on Monday.

In the response Berg insists, among other things, that he is not seeking the documents specified in his motion for expedited discovery for any improper purpose, that the information requested through discovery is of extreme importance and a matter of public safety, and argues that Barack Obama and the DNC

  • have not pointed to any “legitimate privacy concerns.”
  • have not pointed out any “substantiated specific examples” showing that disclosure of the information requested through discovery would “cause and defined and serious injury.”
  • have not effectively demonstrated “any risk that particularly serious embarrassment will result” from turning over the requested documents.
  • have failed to show “good cause” and are not entitled to a protective order.

On the latter, Berg cites a 1994 decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals–the appellate court sitting here in Philadelphia and the natural next step in this case should the losing party in District Court choose to appeal–in which the court held that “good cause” exists when the moving party can specifically demonstrate “that disclosure will cause a clearly defined and serious injury” based upon a seven-factor test:

  1. Whether disclosure will violate any privacy interests;
  2. Whether the information is sought for a legitimate purpose or for an improper purpose;
  3. Whether disclosure of the information will cause a party embarrassment;
  4. Whether confidentiality is sought over information important to public health and safety;
  5. Whether sharing information among the litigants will promote fairness and efficiency;
  6. Whether a party who would benefit from the order of confidentiality is a public entity or official; and
  7. Whether the case involves issues important to the public.”

Read more of the article here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Help Philip J Berg keep Obama accountable:

http://obamacrimes.com

Show your outrage here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg files Opposition to Obama Motion, October 9, 2008, Obama Protective Order Motion, Obama Indonesian, Obama and DNC delay tactics, Obama is Illegal Alien

Philip J Berg filed an Opposition to Obama’s Motion for a Protective
order to prevent Discovery. Obama’s motion was a delay tactic to
prevent Judge Surrick from ruling that Obama must provide proof
of citizenship.

Jeff Schreiber is currently reviewing it. As soon as it appears we will
provide more details.

Philip J Berg’s website:

http://obamacrimes.com

* Update *

Here is the first part of Philip J Berg’s motion in text form:

“UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :
Plaintiff :
vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-cv-04083-RBS
:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA, a/k/a
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM, THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION AND :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE, :
Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW this ______day of October, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants,
Barack H. Obama and the Democratic National Committee’s Motion for a Protective
Order and Stay Pending the Decision on Defendants Dispositive Motion and Plaintiff’s
Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED and DECREED as follows:

1.
Defendants Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery
pending the Court’s Decision on Defendants dispositive Motion is
DENIED;
2.
Defendants are hereby ORDERED to Answer Plaintiff’s
Discovery Requests by way of Admissions and Request for
Production of Documents by October 15, 2008.
IT IS SO ORDERED
BY THE COURT:
R. Barclay Surrick, J.

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 18 Filed 10/09/2008 Page 2 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :
Plaintiff :
vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-04083-RBS
:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA, a/k/a
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM, THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION AND :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE, :
Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW this ______day of October, 2008, upon consideration of Defendants,
Barack H. Obama and the Democratic National Committee’s Motion for a Protective
Order and Stay pending the Decision on Defendants Dispositive Motion and Plaintiff’s
Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED and DECREED as follows:

1.
Defendants Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery pending
the Court’s Decision on Defendants dispositive Motion is DENIED in
part and GRANTED in part;
2.
Pending the Decision on the Defendants, Barack H. Obama and the
Democratic National Committee’s Motion to Dismiss, discovery is
stayed except for the following:
Defendants, Barack H. Obama and the Democratic National Committee are

ORDERED to turn over the following documents by October 15, 2008:

1.
A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth
certificate;

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 18 Filed 10/09/2008 Page 3 of 22

2.
Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of
Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;
3.
A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;
4.
A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of
majority;
5.
Certified copies of Obama’s Application and Admission forms for
Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law
School; and
6.
Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing
Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.
Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama is ORDERED to serve upon Plaintiff
Answers to the following Request for Admissions by October 15, 2008:

Admissions, Request No. 1.
Admit you were born in Kenya.

Admissions, Request No. 2.
Admit you are a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

Admissions, Request No. 3.
Admit your foreign birth was registered in the State
of Hawaii.

Admissions, Request No. 4.
Admit your name was legally changed to Barry
Soetoro and citizenship status was changed to
“natural citizen” of Indonesia.

Admissions, Request No. 5.
Admit you were adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a
citizen of Indonesia.

Admissions, Request No. 6.
Admit Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
Signed a Government “Acknowledgement” form
legally acknowledging you as his son.

Admissions, Request No. 7.
Admit you are an Indonesian citizen.

Admissions, Request No. 8.
Admit you are currently not a “natural born” United
States citizen.
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 18 Filed 10/09/2008 Page 4 of 22

Admissions, Request No. 9.
Admit you are not eligible to serve as the President
of the United States pursuant to Article II, Section I
of the United States Constitution.

Admission, Request No. 10.
Admit you are unable to prove your citizenship
status.

Defendant, the Democratic National Committee is ORDERED to serve upon

Plaintiff Answers to the following Request for Admissions by October 15, 2008:

Admissions, Request No. 1.
Admit you have not verified Barrack Hussein
Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the
United States.

Admissions, Request No. 2.
Admit Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.

Admissions, Request No. 3.
Admit Barack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status
was changed to a “natural” citizen of Indonesia
when his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, M.A. legally
“acknowledged” Obama as his son.

Admissions, Request No. 4.
Admit Barack Hussein Obama’s name was legally
changed to Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen.

Admissions, Request No. 5.
Admit Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural
born” United States citizen.

Admissions, Request No. 6:
Admit you have not inquired into Barrack Hussein
Obama’s citizenship status.

Admissions, Request No. 7.
Admit the United States Constitution does not allow
for a Person to hold the Office of President of the
United States unless that person is a “natural born”
United States citizen.

Admissions, Request No. 8.
Admit you collected donations on behalf of Barack
Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

Admissions, Request No. 9.
Admit the DNC has promised Plaintiff and all
American citizens that the DNC will ensure Open
and Honest Government and uphold the United
States Constitution to protect the United States
citizens.
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 18 Filed 10/09/2008 Page 5 of 22
Admissions, Request No. 10. Admit Barack Hussein Obama is not a legal citizen
of the United States.
IT IS SO ORDERED
BY THE COURT:
R. Barclay Surrick, J. “