Category Archives: United Nations

United Nations

Obama, Acorn, New Party, Democratic Socialists of America, Catholic Bishops, Obama’s radical past, New Party endorsed Obama, Obama Acorn New Party Marxist Socialist connections

I was preparing to write an article about Obama being a member of and
being endorsed by the New Party and the Democratic Socialists of America.
The NoquarterUSA blog came out with an excellent article yesterday on
this subject and since they do such a great job, I will quote them. I
will add a few points but more importantly show the involvement of
Acorn in the socialist efforts.

The New Party

“Obama is Hiding a Radical Past!

By Matthew Weaver”

“Did you know that Barack Obama was affiliated with a leading national socialist party? Barack Obama didn’t include in his 2008 resume that he entered politics in the mid-1990s endorsed by Chicago’s leading socialists. This just keeps getting better and better. Barack Obama was an active participant in the 1990s, and a direct political beneficiary, of the Chicago New Party and, importantly, the Chicago DSA, a group of socialists affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America.

Barack Obama attended and participated in meetings of the Chicago New Party and the Chicago DSA, the local affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Barack Obama sought the endorsement of the Chicago DSA which required rigorous scrutiny by the party’s Political Committee as well as Mr. Obama’s signature on a contract promising “a visible and active relationship with the NP.”
Barack Obama actively used the endorsement from the Chicago DSA.
Barack Obama won his DSA-endorsed and -backed campaign to secure his seat in the Illinois State Senate.
Barack Obama continued his involvement with the Chicago DSA — including directly asking the group to join “his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration” — and received their endorsements in subsequent campaigns.

Obama’s participation in and endorsement from the Chicago New Party and Chicago DSA, the local affiliate of the Democratic Socialists of America (which is the U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International) is quite clear:”

Read more here:

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/10/07/obama-is-hiding-a-radical-past/

The New Party, Acorn, Marxist coalition

“Obama Sought Endorsement of Marxist Third Party in 1996

By Warner Todd Huston”

“Here is some interesting as well as character confirming info about one of Barack Obama’s former runs for office. Apparently, Obama actively sought and received the stamp of approval of a Marxist third party that operated briefly in Chicago between 1992 and 1998. The group was called the “New Party” and was started in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson’s 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison).”

“The New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials — most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.”

Read more here:

http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/warner_todd_huston/2008/may/29/obama_sought_endorsement_of_marxist_third_party_in_1996

“Obama and the New Party

by  Erick Erickson”
“Barack Obama, not needing to, chose to affiliate himself with this band of quasi-communists.  As the nation moves closer to the election, it is clear that Obama chose to affiliate with assorted anti-American radicals.  Machiavelli once noted that we can know a leader by the people he surrounds himself with.  What does that say about Barack Obama, who chose to surround himself with people committed to overthrowing the United States and capitalism?”

Read more here:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26913

Acorn

“A Commentary on the Campaign for Human Development
Prepared for the Catholic Bishops of the United States
Prepared by the Wanderer Forum Foundation

I. Introduction: This commentary is submitted to the Catholic Bishops of the United States with respect to their possible consideration of changes in the organization, funding, and structure of the Campaign for Human Development (CHD). It is essential to note, however, the limited purpose and scope of this commentary:”

“COMMUNITY ORGANIZING: During the funding period of 1992-1995, CHD gave significant grants to community organizing efforts that implement many of the organizational techniques recommended by Saul Alinsky. Many community organizations patterned after Alinsky’s recommendations recruit their membership either entirely or partially by institution. Included among this class of grantees are four national organizations: the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), Gamaliel, Pacific Institute for Community Organizing (PICO), and Direct Action and Research Training Center (DART). The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) which is also patterned on Alinsky’s organizational recommendations, recruits individual members. These five national organizations alone account for approximately 33% of current CHD expenditures annually. For purposes of illustration, it will be useful to note here some aspects of the operation of ACORN and the IAF.”

“During the 1990s, ACORN has been openly active in Congressional lobbying. Its leadership operates, “…from inside positions of power. ACORN’s work on the savings and loan bailout provided effective means of developing and applying power…ACORN members won appointment to the Resolution Trust Corporation to help determine the management of the billions of dollars of assets the government seized.”

“To be eligible to receive CHD funds, a program must be run by the poor, benefit the poor, and change social structures that harm the poor.” However, in light of the politically oriented thrust of ACORN’s activities, it is fair to ask whether the CHD subsidies to ACORN are advisable and commensurate with the purposes of CHD.”

“This commentary does not oppose CHD funding of genuine, grassroots community organizations, run and supported by individual members of a parish or diocese. There is potential value and virtue in the collective voice. However, when the CHD funds Alinsky-style, church-based community organizations as in the best interest of the poor and supports organizations which advance other agendas, it divests the poor of their right to an authentic voice. This process tends to treat the poor as exploited units of human capital, rather than as human beings created in the dignity of God’s image.”

“Nor is there any basis for the CHD to imply by its actions that there are no alternative organizations that it can fund to promote valuable institutional change, uninfluenced by a politicized agenda. There is no necessity for CHD funds to go to organizations which contribute to or participate in any way in the political support of abortion. There is no necessity for CHD to fund Alinsky-style, church-based community organizations. There are alternative, self-determined organizations of the poor, which are supportive of life. Those alternative, grassroots community organizations do not merely serve their constituency but rather they are their constituency. They do not use community organizing to further an additional agenda.

It would be reasonable for the bishops to consider:

The immediate cessation of all CHD funding to Alinsky-style, church-based community organizations.”

To accomplish its goals, as outlined in the People’s Platform, ACORN has developed a political alliance with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Together with others, ACORN and the DSA have formed a political party, the New Party.

“National ACORN president, Maud Hurd, along with Dr. Cornel West (honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America) and a representative from the Reproductive Rights Coalition Fund, are listed as New Party supporters.” 

Read more here:
http://www.wandererforum.org/publications/focus025.html

If you do not want a socialist, Indonesian citizen for US president, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg, Berg vs. Obama, Obama not qualified to be president, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083, Complaint will be served, Obama not citizen, Obama response, Democratic National committee response, Obama citizen of Kenya, Obama citizen of Indonesia

Philip J Berg, attorney at law, filed a complaint on Thursday, August
21, 2008, against Barack Obama. The complaint states that “Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States.”
MR. Berg states the following in his press release:

“Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.“Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a
Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in his lawsuit that Senator Obama:

1. Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or

2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or

3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia.

Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”

The defendants in the complaint are:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :
BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :
BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :
BARRY DUNHAM, THE :
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :
COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :
ELECTION COMMISSION AND :
DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE

How will Barack, Barry, the Democratic National committee and the Federal Election commission react?

Obama and the Obama Campaign will attack and use diversions.

So far, the Obama Campaign can only provide a fake COLB. Will that impress the judge?

How will the delegates to the Democratic National Convention react? Will they continue to stick their heads in the sand?

Visit Philip J Berg’s website to learn more:

http://www.obamacrimes.com

To voice your opinion about Obama, visit the Petition to Impeach,
expel Senator Obama site:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Complaint against Barack Obama, US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Obama is not a natural born citizen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE :

:

Plaintiff

 

:

vs.

 

: CIVIL ACTION NO

.

:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM, THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION AND :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE ::

Defendants

 

:

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARTORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states in particular part, “No Person

except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption

of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person

be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and

been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Furthermore, all Presidents

since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States subsequent to the

Declaration of Independence.

2. “The general doctrine of our Constitution is, that the executive power of the nation is

vested in the President; subject only to the exceptions and qualifications, which are

expressed in the instrument.” 7 Works of Alexander Hamilton, J. C. Hamilton ed. (New

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

1

York: 1851), 76, 80–81 (emphasis in original), U.S. Constitution, Article II (Hamilton and

Madison.)

3. Obama is a representative of the Democratic People. However, the Obama must meet the

Qualifications specified for the United States Office of the President, which is he must be

a “natural born” citizen. Unfortunately, Obama is not a “natural born” citizen. Just to

name one of the problems, Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an

Indonesian citizen and relocated herself and Obama to Indonesia wherein Obama’s

mother naturalized in Indonesia and Obama followed her naturalization, as he was a

minor and in the custody of his mother. Obama failed to take the oath of allegiance when

he turned eighteen (18) years to regain his United States Citizenship status.

4. The Democratic National Committee is for Plaintiff and “We the People” who believe in

the Democratic Vision. The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent the

Democratic Americans in seeking honest leadership, Open Government, Real Security,

Energy Independence, Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare

System that works for Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is

supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing

personal liberties for all. Of which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the

Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified

and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States

Constitution.

5. The actions of Obama, a U.S. Senator, in running for President of the United States,

knowing he is not eligible, have been taken entirely without authorization under the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

2

United States Constitution, completely ignoring the qualification and procedures created

by the United States Constitution he is purporting to enforce.

6. Should Obama become the Nominee of the Democratic Party and then be discovered by

virtue of malfeasance, or negligence, on his part not to have revealed material evidence

showing him to be Ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America

and thereby his Nomination be declared void by the appropriate Authorities Acting under

the Law, Plaintiff as well as other Democratic Americans will suffer Irreparable Harm

including but not limited to:

A) Functional, or Actual, Disenfranchisement of large numbers of Citizens,

being members of the Democratic Party, who would have been

deprived of the ability to choose a Nominee of their liking;

B) Irreparable Harm to the structure and integrity of the Democratic Party

and the Democratic National Committee. In turn, this too would lead to

Disenfranchisement; and

C) A severe and genuine likelihood of Civil Disturbance by virtue of reaction

to said Disenfranchisement.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

7. This case arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and presents a

federal question within this Court’s jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and

28 U.S.C. § 1331.

8. This Court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment

Act, 28 U.S. C. § 2201.

9. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

3

PARTIES

10. Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”], is an adult individual

with a business address of 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA

19444-2531.

11. Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham [hereinafter “Obama” is an adult individual

with an office address of 713 Hatch, Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.

12. Obama, The Democratic National Committee (hereinafter referred to as “DNC”) is a

Corporation with a principal address of 430 S. Capitol Street SE, Washington, DC

20003.

13. Defendant, The Federal Election Commission (FEC) was created in 1975 by Congress

to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). The FEC is a

Governmental Agency with a principal address of 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC

20463.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

14. Since the beginning of the U.S. Constitution, in order to run for Office of the President,

you must be a “natural born citizen” and you may not hold dual citizenship or multiple

citizenships with foreign Countries. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

15. There are questions as to where Obama was actually born, in the United States or abroad

and then registered his birth. There are further questions regarding Obama’s United

States Citizenship, if he ever held such, being expatriated and his failure to regain his

citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance once he turned eighteen (18) years of age.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

4

There are additional questions regarding Obama’s multi citizenships with foreign

countries, which he still maintains. To date, Obama has refused to prove he is qualified

under the U.S. Constitution and his eligibility to run as President of the United States.

16. The facts are undisputed by Obama that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a U.S.

Citizen however, his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a Citizen of Kenya. Obama’s

parents, according to divorce records, were married on or about February 2, 1961.

17. Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961; however, has never

given the name of the hospital he was born in; whereas Obama’s grandmother on his

father’s side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya. Reports

reflect Obama’s mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was

prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy,

which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight. Stanley Ann

Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and

registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or

about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

18. Upon investigation into the birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii,

Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital

and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version under the subject “Barack Obama”

states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version under the

subject “Queens Hospital” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.

19. There are further references circulating on the internet claiming examination of the

hospital’s records in Hawaii show no birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama),

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

5

Obama’s mother. However, there are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about

August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

20. Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal was a contributing writer and published

an article on June 9, 2008 stating the GOP sent a research team to Mombasa, Kenya and

located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity Hospital,

to his father, a Kenyan Citizen and his mother, a U.S. Citizen.

21. At the time of Obama’s birth in 1961, Kenya was a British Colony.

22. There is a Canadian Birth Certificate posted on the Internet in the name of Barack

Hussein Obama, Jr.; however, the date of birth shows to be August 23, 1961.

23. Under the Independence Constitution of Kenya, Obama became a Kenyan citizen on

December 12, 1963. Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy

Martin states Obama has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship. Andy Martin further

states on Obama’s Senate web site, Obama tap dances around his own dual nationality

when discussing his father. Obama obviously knows, because his father told the Obama,

that he (Obama) also held/holds Kenyan nationality.

24. If in fact Obama was born in Kenya, the laws on the books at the time of his birth stated

if a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his

mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother would have had to live ten (10) years in

the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of

Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the

residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship. The

laws in effect at the time of Obama’s birth prevented U.S. Citizenship at birth of children

born abroad to a U.S. Citizen parent and a non-citizen parent, if the citizen parent was

under the age of nineteen (19) at the time of the birth of the child. Obama’s mother did

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

6

not qualify under the law on the books to register Obama as a “natural born” citizen.

Section 301(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163,

235, 8 U.S.C. §1401(b), Matter of S-F- and G-, 2 I & N Dec. 182 (B.I.A.) approved

(Att’y Gen. 1944). Obama would have only been naturalized and a Naturalized citizen is

not qualified and/or eligible to run for Office of the President. U.S. Constitution, Article

II, Section I, Clause 4.

25. Furthermore, if Obama had been born in Kenya, his birth father Barack Obama, Sr. was a

citizen of Kenya; therefore, Obama would have automatically become a citizen of Kenya.

26. In or about 1967, when Obama was approximately six (6) years old, his mother, Stanley

Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and moved to Indonesia with

Obama. At this time, if Obama was Registered as a “natural born” citizen, which he did

not qualify to be registered as, he would have lost his U.S. Citizenship when his mother

married Lolo Soetoro and took up residency in Indonesia. The first requirement is that

naturalization must be achieved through “application

 

.”

Such type of naturalization

occurs, for example, when a person acquires a foreign nationality by marriage to a

national of that country. Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b). Additionally, there is

rumor circulating on the Internet that his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted

Obama.

27. The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when the person became

naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody of such person.

Obama’s mother expatriated her U.S. Citizenship when she married Lolo Soetoro, a

citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

7

28. Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in

Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration where it clearly

states Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and lists his citizenship as Indonesian, Obama’s

father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of birth and place of birth are listed as

August 4, 1961 in Honolulu and Obama’s Religion is listed as Islam. This document was

verified by television show

 

Inside Edition

, whose reporter, Matt Meagher took the actual

footage of the school record.

29. In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10)

years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

30. Sometime after the return of Obama to Hawaii, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham

returned to Hawaii and divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro. At the time of Divorce,

Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham could have regained her U.S. Citizenship. In

order to regain her citizenship, Obama’s mother would have had to take the oath of

allegiance required. Such oath of allegiance may be taken abroad before a diplomatic or

consular officer of the United States, or in the United States before the Attorney General

or the judge or clerk of a Court. Such Oath of allegiance would have been entered in the

records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney General

and upon demand, a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath

administered, under the seal of the embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney

General shall be delivered. The certified copy shall be evidence of the facts stated therein

before any court of record or judicial tribunal and in any department or agency of the

Government of the United States. 8 U.S.C. §1435.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

8

31. As stated above, The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when

the person became naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody

of such person. Obama’s mother expatriated her U.S. Citizenship when she married Lolo

Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.

32. Obama’s mother failed to take the oath in order to regain her U.S. Citizenship.

Therefore, Obama would not have been able to regain his U.S. Citizenship until he turned

eighteen (18) years after he took the oath of allegiance before a diplomatic or consular

officer of the United States, or in the U.S. before the Attorney General or the judge or

clerk of court. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama failed to regain

his citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance. Since the oath of allegiance would have

been entered in the records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the

Attorney General, if Plaintiff is incorrect, then Obama should be able to produce in Court

a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath administered.

33. Investigation further showed in 1981, Obama traveled to Pakistan using his Indonesian

passport. At the time of travels to Indonesia, Obama was twenty (20) years old. He was

well aware he maintained his Indonesia citizenship, and failed to regain his United States

citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship. Had Obama regained his United

States citizenship, he would have been traveling on a United States Passport.

34. Obama and his Campaign office have been asked for Obama’s Certificate of Birth in

order to prove he is a “natural born” citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

9

35.

 

After many attempts of the public to obtain Obama’s Certificate of Birth, a Hawaiian

Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) was placed on Obama’s campaign website. However,

as posted all over the internet, three (3) independent Document Forensic Experts

performed extensive Forensic testing on the Certificate of Live Birth posted on Obama’s

campaign website. The Forensic Expert findings were the Certificate of Live Birth

(COLB) was in fact a forgery. It was further discovered that this original Certificate of

Live Birth which had been altered and forged was issued to Maya Kasandra Soetoro,

born in 1970. Maya Kasandra Soetoro is Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia

and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on

Obama’s website located at

 

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

36. Further investigation led to Obama’s State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary

Record. On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it

specifically asks for “Full former name(s). Obama put “None,” when in fact he went by

the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama. It is further believed Obama has used the

name Barry Dunham. Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the

penalty of perjury.

37. Even if Obama maintained his United States Citizenship, which he failed to do, he also

carries citizenships in Kenya and Indonesia. Obama has divided loyalties with foreign

countries. Thus, Obama carries multiple citizenships and is ineligible to run for President

of the United States. United States Constitution, Article II, Section I.

38. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because the Obama

cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

10

eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of their

citizen choice for the nomination.

39. Voters donated money, goods and services to select a nominee, and were defrauded by

Obama’s obfuscations. Obama clearly shows consciousness of guilt by his actions by

posting a forged birth certificate on his website, and by and the falsifications he told to

cover his loss of citizenship.

40. Obama proclaims himself a Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had

no eligibility to become President except by means of obfuscations and deceptions.

41. The injunctive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction defrauds

everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair representation

of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted, fraudulent

nomination process to continue.

42. It not only allows, but promotes an overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates

such a lack of confidence in voters of the primary process itself, so that it would cement a

prevailing belief that no potential candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect

our election process, follow the Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying

and defrauding voters to get onto the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they

fraudulently manage to get elected.

43. If declaratory and injunctive relief is not given, it would be extremely unfair to the

country for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question

as to the nominee’s eligibility to serve if elected.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

11

44. As stated above, Plaintiff as well as Democratic American Citizens will suffer Irreparable

Harm if Declaratory and Injunctive relief is not granted. Plaintiff does not have any other

way of redress regarding these very significant and important issues.

45. The DNC has failed Plaintiff and the Democratic American Citizens by their failure to

perform due diligence and inquire into Obama’s eligibility to run for Office of the

President.

COUNT ONE

VIOLATION OF THE

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,

ARTICLE II, SECTION I

46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 45 as if fully set forth herein.

47. The United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 4, Qualifications,

Office of President, states:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United

States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be

eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be

eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of

thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the

United States.”

48. Obama’s failure to maintain his United States Citizenship makes him ineligible

to run for Office of the President.

49. Obama, if born in Kenya would have made him a citizen of Kenya.

Furthermore, because of the 1940 Naturalization Act, June 1952, Obama’s

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

12

mother would have had to be nineteen (19) in order for Obama to be a

“natural born” United States citizenship upon registration of his birth.

Obama’s mother was only eighteen (18) when she birthed Obama and

therefore was not old enough to meet the residency requirements under our laws

at the time of Obama’s birth and be able to register her son’s birth as a

“natural born” citizen.

50. Even if Obama would have been able to be registered as a “natural born” citizen

in Hawaii, he lost his citizenship in the United States when his mother

married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and then took Obama to

Indonesia and set up residency with her new husband.

51. Obama’s mother could have regained her and Obama’s United States

Citizenship status when she divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved back

to Hawaii. However, in order to regain her citizenship in the United States she

would have had to take the oath of allegiance, which would have been recorded.

Obama’s mother never did take the oath of allegiance to regain her citizenship in

the United States.

52. Moreover, Obama could have regained his citizenship in the United States when

he turned eighteen (18), again by taking the oath of allegiance that would have

been recorded. However, Obama failed to do so.

53. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the

Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the

President under the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

13

qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire

into Obama’s eligibility status.

54. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately supply a

certified copy of his oath of allegiance proving he regained his United States

Citizenship. In addition, Obama needs to furnish a certified copy of his

Certificate of Live Birth to further prove he was born in Hawaii as he claims.

However, if Obama is unable to supply a certified record of his oath of

allegiance, he needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for

President.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

14

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

COUNT TWO

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

55. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully set forth herein.

56. From the beginning of our Constitution, our forefathers inferred a person running

for Office of the President could not have divided loyalties. This was a result of

people coming from England to the United States who owed loyalties to both

England and the United States. Our forefather’s did not want a person with dual

loyalties to be able to secure the position as President of the United States.

57. This inference is taken from Article II, Section I, which plainly states

qualifications for Office of the President must be a “natural born” citizen.

58. The United States President cannot run our Country and have responsibilities

and obligations owed to other countries.

59. Obama is not eligible to run for Office of the United States President as his

mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, a citizen

of Indonesia, when Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his

United States Citizenship when he turned eighteen (18). Therefore, Obama is not

a “natural born” citizen.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

15

60. Furthermore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does

not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at

which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a

United States Passport.

61. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision

and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the

qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire

into Obama’s eligibility status.

62. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down

and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

16

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

COUNT THREE

FRAUD

63. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 62 as if fully set forth herein.

64. Obama committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American Citizens by running

for President claiming to be eligible knowing he was not eligible as a result of

his failure to regain his United States Citizenship and by maintaining multi

citizenships with Kenya and Indonesia.

65. Obama further committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American people by

falsifying information on his Illinois State Bar Registration and Public

Disciplinary Record. Obama stated on his Application to the State Bar of

Illinois, as proven by the Illinois State Bar Registration and Disciplinary

Record, stating he never used any other names. Obama signed his

application/registration for the Illinois State Bar under the penalty of perjury

knowing the information to be false. The fact of the matter is Obama used the

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

17

name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia and was registered as a citizen of Indonesia on

his school records. Obama further used the name Barry Obama and it is further

believed Obama used the name Barack and/or Barry Dunham.

66. Obama attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American people by allowing an

altered and forged Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) to be placed on his

campaign website. Obama was well aware the Government issued COLB was altered

and forged as the original document was in the name of

 

Maya Kasandra Soetoro born

in 1970. Maya Kassandra Soetoro Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia

and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on

Obama’s campaign website located at

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

67. Obama further attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American People by

claiming to be a United States Citizen, knowing this information to be false.

Obama is well aware when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of

Indonesia and took up residency in Indonesia with Obama, they both

naturalized in Indonesia expatriating their United States Citizenship. Obama’s

mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, when

Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his United States

Citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance, which is recorded when he turned

eighteen (18) years.

68. Furthermore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does

not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at

69.

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

18

which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a

United States passport.

70. Moreover, as stated above, Obama was registered in School in Jakarta,

Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, born in 1961 in Hawaii and his

religion was registered as Islam.

71. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect

the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic

Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the

Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the

President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC

has failed to inquire into Obama’s eligibility status.

72. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down

and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.

WHEREFORE

,

 

Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under

the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;

B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein

Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a

Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of

the President;

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

19

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic

Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;

D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988

and other applicable by law; and

E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just

and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Philip J. Berg

___________________________

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in

 

Pro Se

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Identification No. 09867

(610) 825-3134

C:\Documents and Settings\Geoff\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\RUX63DMN\ObamaComplaint.doc

 

20

, , ,

Barack Obama, Jeremiah Wright, lies, racism, anti semitism, hate America, entitlement, health care, poor housing, African Americans tortured

“We control life, Winston, at all its levels.  You are imagining that there is something called human nature which will be outraged by what we do and will turn against us.  But we create human nature.  Men are infinitely malleable.” 1984 by George Orwell.
“Do not hate your brother in your heart.” Leviticus 19:17
“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” John 8:32
I will present the truth and facts to you. Not white truth, not black truth, not green truth. Just the truth. If I discover an error by myself or others, I will correct it.

There are no white people or black people. Hold your hand next to a white sheet and black sheet of paper. There is only one race of people, the human race. Some of my best friends have skin color that is darker or lighter than my own. I am in their homes, they are in mine. Some of these people have spent days to a year in my home.

Slavery is a great evil. It is not a white skinned or black
skinned issue. Slavery, racism and bigotry are about taking
advantage of other people. This can become widespread due to conquest, laws and ignorance.
Slavery was wrong when light skinned people owned darker skinned people in America.
Slavery was wrong when American Indians owned darker skinned people in America.
Slavery was wrong when dark skinned people owned dark skinned people in America.
Slavery was wrong when Africans sold and owned dark skinned people in Africa.
Slavery was wrong when Vikings sold and owned people in Europe.
Slavery was wrong when Romans sold and owned people in Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa.
Slavery was wrong when Egyptians sold and owned people in the Middle East and Africa.
Slavery was wrong when Middle Easterners sold and owned people in the Middle East and Africa.
Slavery was wrong when ancient Europeans sold and owned people in Europe.
Slavery was wrong when ancient peoples of the Americas sold and owned people.

Slavery has not existed in the United States for well over a hundred years. Slavery did not begin here. It was too slow in being eradicated but it was ended. George Washington and Abraham Lincoln grew up in an era of slavery, racism and bigotry. The information they were “programmed” with led them to believe that blacks were inferior. They were products of their environment. Despite the misinformation they were given, they slowly came to the realization that what they had believed about blacks was wrong.
This is one of the reasons that what pastor Jeremiah Wright
is preaching is important. Most importantly, he is enfluencing
his parishioners, especially the children. He has also had an
impact on Barack Obama, who is running for president of the US. This is not a casual relationship. Jeremiah Wright has been consistently referred to as a mentor to Barack Obama. Don’t even begin to question the above. I am very well educated and studied quite a bit of history.

Next to statements regarding entitlement and what the US government owes it’s citizens. What the federal government is responsible for is quite simple. Here are the primary responsibilities: Defense, law legislation, Supreme Court decisions, federal banking and interstate commerce. The President of the United States has the primary job of Commander in Chief. Once again national defense.

Accountability is lacking in modern day society. Why do modern day Americans have a sense of entitlement. That is, the government owes them affordable housing, free health care, educations, etc. There are three main reasons for this. The modern day Democratic Party that get votes by promising hand outs from the government,
demagogues that gain from manipulating the masses and human greed.

Here is a good example of this lack of accountability from a
recent post on this blog:

“While it is clear that a disproportionate number of African Americans are tortured by inadequate health care; poor housing, inadequate educations, abusive criminal justice, unemployment and high crime, much of this today is because they live in poverty. And in the global capitalism of today these conditions now exist for countless numbers of other Americans, white, Asian, Latino and others.”

The word torture is used again. This is a common ploy of the liberal left. Once again, there is a lack of personal accountability. The reason many of these people are in poverty is due to a lack of personal accountability and the notion that they are owed everything. Much of this comes from the modern day Democrats and demagogues.
Just look around at all the people that come to the US knowing full well of the opportunity here. All they have to do is work hard and they do, and often turn their lives around in one generation.

One of the other great lies being told is about George W Bush
and the Iraq War. George Bush did not lie about the Iraq War. There are two posts on this blog concerning the tone of the country and the situation in Iraq prior to the war. 10 quotes were provided about Iraq and Saddam Hussein, yet people have short memories and many have an agenda of propagating lies. All of the quotes came from the Clinton Administration and substantiate what George W Bush acted upon.

Lies and diversions. These are the hallmark of the liberal left.
Barack Obama’s speech about racism was a diversion. Yes, it was brilliant and eloquent, but so was Adolf Hitler. The German people wanted change. Change is not always good. Some people posting on this blog are attempting diversions as well. They speak of this white pastor and that white pastor. This is once again a diversion and rationalization. Everyone is accountable for their own actions. Some of these pastors said some really stupid things. However, Jeremiah Wright is spewing racist hate, anti semitism and hate for America. When I hear these other pastors spewing this level
of hate and mentoring a presidential candidate for 20 years, then I will redirect my energies.
 
So, why am I and many others focusing attention on Barack Obama, Jeremiah Wright and others they associated with. Many red flags were raised by the hate speeches of pastor Wright, his mentoring of Barack Obama for 20 years, ties to Saddam Hussein, other suspicious middle eastern and African ties and ties to criminal elements. There were red flags in Germany prior to the rise of Adolf Hitler. The people chose to ignore them. They were swept up in the euphoria of the moment with a promise of change. Even though then, as now, words of racism, anti semitism and hate were being used,
it was somebody else that was responsible for their problems. This is too important to characterize as a blacks versus whites issue. We are all Americans and we need to make an informed decision.

Iraq war, history 101, United Nations, US role, facts, revisionist history

There are 1 or more people commenting on this blog that are purportedly University of Western Florida students. Responding with comments to my posts is ok. Disagreeing with me is ok. Trying to take over this blog is not. If you need a platform for your agenda, start your own blog.

History 101 and the Iraq War

Prerequisites: some fundamental knowledge of 20th century history. Closest analogy to Iraq war in past 100 years, World War II.

Topic 1 – The Iraq war is costing a lot of money. There is a cost of action and a cost of inaction. Assignment: calculate the cost of World War II in today’s dollars. Cost in human lives. What would the dollar cost and human cost have been if we had not entered the war? What would the dollar cost and human cost have been if we had gotten involved 1 year earlier? 2 years earlier?

Now, suppose we had not stopped the Iraq invasion of Kuwait. Now suppose we had left Saddam Hussein unchecked. Now factor in Iran and their desire for a nuclear capabability. Don’t believe for 1 minute that Iran has not been pursueing a nuclear program. A friend of mine 25 years ago was married to an Iranian nuclear physicist.

Lesson: there is always a cost for action and a cost for inaction.

Topic 2 – Does the US have a desire to police the world? The answer is no. The United Nations had a clear purpose to prevent Saddam Hussein from getting out of control. The United Nations failed to perform it’s duty. Why? Key members, France, Germany and Russia were “in bed” financially with Saddam Hussein. If my memory is correct, our so called policing was welcome in World War II when the world was going down the toilet and close to Nazi domination.

Lesson: The US is forced into action by the irresponsibility of other nations. Fortunately, the Iraq war was a coalition of many countries including Great Britain and Australia.

Myth: The US is the cause of death and injuries to the Iraqi People. This is an outright lie. The people saying this are liars. Saddam Hussein, remnants of his regime, factional frictions and outside radical Islamic cowards are the cause. And yes, anyone that would attack innocent women and children or ask them to become a weapon, that person is the lowest level of coward. Radical Islamists, if you were real men, you would face American men face to face and not send women and children to do your evil killing.

Any questions, class?

John Coleman, Weather Channel Founder, Sue Al Gore, Carbon Credits, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, thinks Al Gore should be sued for misrepresenting the impact of carbon dioxide, CO2, and selling carbon credits. Here is an exerpt from Fox News about his recent statement:

“Not Fair and Balanced?

Weather Channel founder John Coleman is calling global warming a fraud and says the station he founded needs to stop telling people what to think about climate change. The Business and Media Institute reports Coleman was a speaker at the Heartland Institute’s Climate Change Conference in New York. Coleman was referencing what some call the Weather Channel’s global warming alarmism.

One of its meteorologists suggested two years ago that weathercasters who have doubts about global warming should lose their certification. Coleman advocates suing people who sell carbon credits — including Al Gore — because the attention in the courts could, in his words, “put some light on the fraud of global warming.”

The two-day conference is actually getting quite a bit of media coverage — with stories in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Sun and many others.”

Click here to view the Fox news article:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335030,00.html

The trancript of John Coleman’s conversation is listed on Rush Limabaugh’s website. Rush members can listen to it. Here are John Coleman’s remarks:

 “BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
 
 
RUSH: John Coleman, who founded the Weather Channel, wants to sue Algore on this whole business of global warming being a hoax.  I have loved John Coleman ever since he used to be the weatherman at Good Morning America. He was on Fox & Friends today, and Steve Doocy said, “Why should Algore be sued?”

COLEMAN:  The whole backbone of the global warming “science” is what they called CO2 forcing.  This is carbon dioxide, and they say that this little trace compound in the atmosphere — 38 molecules of carbon dioxide out of a hundred thousand molecules in our atmosphere, they say this little trace element — puts the carbon in the air that forces the water vapor to create this uncontrollable global warming. It’s gonna bring this climatic catastrophe.

DOOCY: Right. Right.

COLEMAN: All right, that’s what they’re finding.  Now, I don’t believe that’s the way it works at all.

DOOCY: Mmm-hmm. Mmm-hmm.

COLEMAN: I see absolutely no evidence that CO2, carbon dioxide, is causing any warm-up in temperatures.  I don’t think it’s happening. I’m asking the question:  If Al Gore knows that CO2 forcing is invalid — isn’t really happening — and he goes ahead and sells these carbon credits for millions of dollars, is he committing financial fraud?  That is the question.

RUSH:  Doocy says, “Well, John, there’s no disputing the temperature on the planet’s gone up by one degree.” Steve, it’s come down a degree! The whole century gain was wiped out before recent temperature readings, and here’s what Coleman said.

COLEMAN:  I dispute that.

DOOCY:  You do dispute that!

COLEMAN:  I think the whole statistics are somewhat questionable.  Where are they measuring this temperature?  Who’s measuring it?  How are they handling the data? 

DOOCY:  The whole global warming thing is just a hyped scam?

COLEMAN:  Maybe over the last hundred years the temperature on planet Earth went up by close to a degree or so. 

DOOCY: Mmm-hmm?

COLEMAN: That’s not a big deal.  In the last 12 months, the climate on earth has gone down by a full degree.  This has been the coldest winter in modern history globally.

DOOCY: Sure.

RUSH:  Amen.  John Coleman.  I love that guy.
 
 
 
 
END TRANSCRIPT ”

Listen to Rush or go to Rush Limbaugh’s site to learn more:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030508/content/01125115.guest.html
 
 

Iraq War justification, Iraq War reasons, can we justify, George W Bush or Bill Clinton, media lies, political lies, truth

On February 23, 2008 I posted the following:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/02/23/iraq-war-justification-iraq-war-reasons-can-we-justify-hillary-clinton-john-mccain-barrack-obama/

This post was a list of 10 quotes regarding Saddam Hussein. I did not provide the source of the quotes at that time. Many people, for whatever reason, believe only George W Bush took the posture indicated in the quotes, when in reality, the entire Clinton administration believed that Saddam Hussein had WMD, had used them on his own people, posed a real threat and that the US was ready to stop him. All of the quotes from the original post came from the Clinton Administration. Below are the original quotes, followed by the source and the dates. Also, below, I have supplied the links to the CNN articles that contain the quotes. Interesting, isn’t it? Think of all the lies that have been told about George W Bush and the acceptance of revisionist history.

” We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the
stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass
destruction.”  “The chemical weapons Saddam has used and the biological weapons we know he has tested pay no attention to borders and nationalities.”   Madeleine Albright, February 1, 1998

2.  “If diplomacy runs out, we have reserved the right to use
force and if we do so it will be substantial.”   Madeleine Albright, February 1, 1998

3.  “No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing.  He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.”   Madeleine Albright, February 18, 1998

4.  “What we are doing is so that you all can sleep at night.  I am very proud of what we are doing.  We are the greatest nation in the world and what we are doing is being the indispensable nation, willing to make the world safe for our children and grandchildren, and for nations who follow the rules.”    Madeleine Albright, February 18, 1998

5.  “Saddam (Hussein) must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

6.  “If Saddam can cripple the weapons inspections sytem and get away with it, he would conclude the international community, led by the United States, has simply lost its will.  He would surmise that he has free rein to rebuild his arsenal of destruction.”   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

7.  “Earlier today I ordered America’s armed forces to strike
military and security targets in Iraq.  They are joined by British forces.  Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.  While other countires also had weapons of mass desctuction, Hussein is in a different category because he has used such weapons
against his own people and against his neighbors.   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

8.  “Along with Prime minister (Tony)Blair of Great Britain, I made it equally clear that if Saddam failed to cooperate fully we would be prepared to act without delay, diplomacy or warning.”   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

9.  “The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi goverment — a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people.”   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

10.  “But once more, the United States has proven that although we are never eager to use force, when we must act in America’s vital interests, we will do so.”   Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9802/01/iraq/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9802/18/town.meeting.folo/

http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/

Liberal lies, media lies, Iraq war reasons, students misled, George W Bush, Clinton administration

I just received 2 comments from what appears to be a sincere college student. I am assuming this student wants to hear the truth. I will present the truth here. The 2 comments are below, just as submitted:

Comment on #4: this argument is thought provoking, however, I disagree with the assumption that the U.S is the world police. The U.S is not the world police. The UN was created specifically to take the position of being the world police, and to form stability among nations. The U.S needs to let the UN do its job.
Mar 9, 2:59 AM —  View post “Iraq War justification, Iraq War reasons, can we justify, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama”

Comment on #3 : I think this argument is right about Saddam Hussein being a bad man , but I respectfully disagree with the assumption that Saddam Hussein’s evilness was the only reason the U.S took it upon itself to invade Iraq. There is also an assumption that the Iraq war had nothing to do with oil, when it is painfully obvious that it did have a lot to do with oil and the power to dominate. The Bush Administration drove us to believe that the war effort was promoting humanitarianism and was to remove threats, “WMD”, but the truth is Iraq pose no threat to the U.S because there was no WMD, and the attack was obviously for personal reasons hold by the Bush Administration. The U.S is not a world police. It is not our job to attack every country that has bad leadership, if that’s the case we need to be attacking our self for our bad leadership.
Mar 9, 4:17 AM —  View post “Iraq War justification, Iraq War reasons, can we justify, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama”

First of all, all of the quotes of my original post were made by the Clinton Administration and not President George W Bush. I will respond with another post and provide the source and date of each quote.

Regarding the United Nations and the US playing the role of police: Just as in World War II, the US has had to come to the rescue of the world. The United Nations failed to perform it’s duty to deal with Saddam Hussein. Why did this occur? Fundamentally because France, Germany and Russia were “in bed” with him financially. As you now know, the Clinton Administration considered Saddam Hussein a serious threat and were prepared to take action against him.

Here is my answer to the second comment. Once again, you responded to comment #3 of my post which also was a Clinton Administration quote. Saddam Hussein used WMD on multiple occasions against Iran and his own people. There is absolutely no proof that he did not have them when we invaded or that he was not producing them. Saddam Hussein was a very evil man who was capable of doing anything that he was not stopped from doing. He murdred hundreds of his own people, invaded Kuwait, destroyed the habitat of people in the southern part of Iraq and raped and tortured many others.

I would like to know where you got your informatiom. Was it the media, your teachers, your friends? I hope that you will follow up on this and seek the facts and the truth. Also, read 1984 by George Orwell or reread it. Pay particular attention to doublespeak. If you have any questions or comments, please respond.

Sincerely,

Citizen Wells

John Stuart Mill, War, Good cause, Liberal Parliament member, War quote

John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and liberal Member of Parliament. He was also a  influential liberal thinker of the 19th century and a teacher of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham. Mill was an advocate for Ireland, and the first Parliament member to propose that women be given the right to vote. Mill was a strong advocate of women’s rights. He believed that in some cases, war is the lesser of evils. Here is John Stuart Mill’s  famous quote concerning war:
“But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other.”

Douglas Kinnard, UVM professor of political science, The War managers, University of Vermont, Vietnam vs Iraq, Question for professor, General Kinnard

First of all, I believed that we should not be in Vietnam when the war was going on and I believe that even more so now. I also respect Americans that served in Vietnam and followed their conscience. Dwight D Eisenhower, in a 1961 speech, warned of the military industrial complex. Here is the quote:

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

The rest of the speech can be viewed here:

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html

I believe we must be on guard against the undue influence of armaments manufacturers. I also believe these financial gain sources played too big a role in our involvement in Vietnam. Of course, we still need to employ our checks and balances to guard against any undue influence.

Many have tried to connect imaginary dots to form an analogy between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. The only strong analogy I can discern is that both were unpopular wars. I hope that all wars are unpopular wars. However, many choices in life are choosing the lesser of evils. Some wars such as The American Revolution, World War II and the Iraq War are the lesser of evils. If we had entered World War II earlier, I am certain that millions of lives could have been saved.
I am also convinced that if the United Nations had performed as it was chartered, our involvement in Iraq would have been radically different. Of course that was not possible with France, Germany and Russia being “in bed” with Saddam Hussein financially.

Douglas Kinnard, UVM professor of political science, former general in Vietnam and author of “The War Managers”, was interviewed in The Vermont Quarterly in the Fall 2007 issue. He speaks of his involvement with Vietnam as a general, in the military, and his opinion of the Vietnam War. At the end of the interview, he states, “Those who fail to learn from history are forced to repeat it.” I wholeheartedly agree with that statement, but would add that as long as the learning takes place from a broad based factual account of history and not revisionist history.

Professor Kinnard adds this statement at the end: “If Bush knew the real lessons of Vietnam, he would get out sooner than stay.” I would like a clarification of that statement. Was the statement made to appease the ultra liberal folks at The University Of Vermont, or was it a general (no pun intended) statement about lingering past our eminent usefulness? 

Dr. Douglas Kinnard, I respectfully request your response. I do not want to misrepresent your statement.