Category Archives: Charlotte Observer

Rhino Times, Greensboro, NC, John Hammer, Real news, truth about Obama and government

We were in Greensboro, NC over the weekend and as usual picked up a copy of the Rhino Times, one of the few newsprint outlets in NC that tell it like it is. Unlike other papers in large cities of North Carolina such as the Charlotte Observer, they did not drink the kool aid and attempted to expose the truth about the real Barack Obama. Editor in chief, John Hammer, is in the forefront of exposing Obama with his column “Under The Hammer.”

Here is a segment from “Under The Hammer” dated April 30, 2009:

“Under the Hammer  

 

 

   
 
     

April 30, 2009It appears we have elected a man president whose main claim to fame is that he reads well from a teleprompter. Whatever is there he reads with a predictable pacing that people seem to like. When it said “privacy” on the screen instead of “piracy,” he read privacy even though it made no sense.

When the teleprompter can’t keep up he motions for it to move faster and apologizes to the audience. Wouldn’t it be nice if he had some idea what he was saying and could give a five-minute speech without having to read the exact words off a screen?

I guess we are getting what we deserve. For years the media has allowed people who sit in front of cameras and read from teleprompters to call themselves journalists or reporters. Many are not. They don’t write the stories, they just read them, like Ted Baxter on The Mary Tyler Moore Show or Ron Burgundy in Anchorman. These caricatures are all too real. But nobody wants to admit that the people reading the news on television are often just pretty faces who read well. We pretend that they actually go out, get the information and write the stories even though we know it isn’t true.

When Dan Rather got caught with a false story about former President George W. Bush, he of course blamed it on his producer – the person who actually researched and wrote the story – while at the same time not admitting that he didn’t write his own news.

So for years we have had people pretending to be reporters and the nation has gone along with the farce. Now we have a man pretending to be president. He has the same skill set as the network newsreaders: He reads well from a teleprompter. We know that he will read whatever is there because we do not have a problem with “privacy” on the high seas. The scary part is that Obama doesn’t flinch or get a puzzled expression on his face when the teleprompter is wrong; he just continues to read whatever is put before him on the teleprompter.

We know that he will stop reading when the teleprompter can’t keep up because he doesn’t ad lib. He stops and tells the technician to get it fixed.

When he was in France, Obama said that he didn’t know what the word for “wheeling and dealing” was in Austrian. It is a true statement because Austrian is not a language any more than American is a language. The people in Austria mostly speak German. Americans mostly speak English.

Imagine if former President George W. Bush had made that statement. In fact, former Vice President Dan Quayle said something similar about knowing Latin when he was going to Latin America. The press made great fun of him over and over again, but it is a statement that makes sense. If you know Latin you can understand some Spanish, as well as other romance languages.

The press made Quayle out to be an idiot for making a perfectly reasonable statement. Obama made a statement about a language that does not exist, and that is not even mentioned in the mainstream media.

To find out about Obama’s mistakes you are better off reading British newspapers than American newspapers, or you can watch Fox News.”

Read more:

http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/Articles-i-2009-04-30-194804.112113_Under_the_Hammer.html

 

Charlotte Observer, March 13, 2009, Vivek Kundra, Obama article, Obama technology aide, Obama campaign, FBI raid, Obama Chief Technology Officer Vivek Kundra, Yusuf Acar and Sushil Bansal arrested by FBI

The Charlotte Observer once again proves it’s bias and
irresponsible reporting by hiding negative news about
Barack Obama and providing the most positive spin about
a damaging news story. This comes as no surprise. The
Observer endorsed Obama early in the election year and
provided no coverage of the many corruption ties. A
commenter on this blog has expressed this well:

“Friday, March 13, 09

  I Almost missed a very short article buried on page 14a along side giant ads for an end-of- season clearance sale that took 4/5 of the page.
   The article was in the CHARLOTTE OBSERVER with an innocent small lead line of “An Aide to President Obama is on leave from his White House Job”.
   Normally I would not read anything on page 14a, but this was the most important atricle in this newspaper this morning…..and it was buried without pomp along with the ads.
   Of course the article was about VIVEK KUNDRA and his hi-tech computer technology company. The article stated  2 of Kundra’s employees had been arrested in a raid by the FBI in D.C. and were being held without bond. Also found at the home of one who was arrested (Yusuf Acar-sounds like an Arab too me) was over $70,000 in CASH.
   What the article DIDN’T say was that KUNDRA ran Obama’s internet operation during his campaign operations! What the article didn’t say was Obama received millions and millions of questionable contribution dollars during his primary and general election campaigns by computer! Also what the article didn’t say was this was an ongoing investigation which went back quite some time! What the article didn’t say was what was OBAMA’s connection to Kundra and this illegal operation! What the article didn’t say was why no bond was granted to the 2 people arrested…were they flight risk?
   I think this story has long legs and will fly once the full truth is known.
   The big question remains….will “Slick Barry” take his place along side the others involved in this fraud, or will he slide again?
    I doubt the OBSERVER will ever print the truth about this matter considering they have already drank the Obama Kool-Aide, but thats ok. The bloggers will cover it fully!”

RMinNC

Virginian Pilot, PilotOnline.com, US Constitution Hall of Shame, Obama not eligible, US Congress, Obama birth certificate, Obama’s eligibility must be challenged, US Supreme Court, VA newspaper

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

 

I have watched the 2008 election in horror and amazement as Barack Obama
has passed from the primaries through the Electoral College vote with
a great deal of help and few challenges from the MSM. I watched as
newspapers like the Charlotte Observer and Chicago Tribune endorsed
Obama. The Tribune, speaking out of both sides of their mouth, actually
did cover some negative aspects of Obama, but still endorsed him.

I was just provided a heads up to an article that reaches a whole new
pinnacle of bias and ignorance. And to add to the audacity of this article,
it came out in the area of a huge US Naval base and military population.

The Virginian Pilot, on December 10, 2008, came out with the following
article that will leave anyone that has earnestly followed the Obama
eligibility scandal, shaking their heads.

“Facts can’t dispel Obama conspiracy sideshow
Posted to: Editorials Opinion”

“The certifiable certificate hunters occupy just one branch of the crazy
tree of deniers who have crafted a tangle of competing claims, none of
which makes anything like sense:

 
1. Obama’s birth certificate is a fake, forged by the state of Hawaii,
which would be plain if the campaign would just release it, along with his
letters of admission to Occidental College, Columbia and Harvard.

2. The decision to release the birth certificate to the well-respected
FactCheck.org Web site (which confirmed its authenticity) proves that Obama
has something to hide, since facts are untrustworthy.

3. The publication of a birth announcement in the local paper 47 years ago
proves nothing, since that was a ruse to protect the infant Obama’s ability
to run for president, since he was actually born in Kenya.

4. Even if Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and can prove it,
his father was a Kenyan, and, therefore, Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen,
despite the fact that he was born in America to an American mother.

5. Actually, his father was British. But same thing.

6. Since Obama later lived in Indonesia with his mother, he actually became
an Indonesian citizen, because anyone who lives anywhere other than the United
States automatically becomes a citizen of that country. It’s in a book someplace.

7. Because Obama hasn’t been willing to directly answer questions dropping
from the crazy tree — and because the courts have refused to make him — then
Obama is a traitor, and nobody has to listen to him when he’s president.”

“That last one seems to be the goal, of course, of the whole bizarre campaign,
which would be meaningless to most of us except for the fact that the U.S.
Supreme Court wasted a few minutes recently batting aside a lawsuit on the
subject.

These conspiracy kooks (more than a few of whom also believe that George W.
Bush ordered the 9/11 attacks) have erected an impenetrable wall of lunacy
around Obama’s citizenship, and no birth certificate or testimony, no court
decision or proof can penetrate it.”

The complete article:

http://hamptonroads.com/2008/12/facts-can%E2%80%99t-dispel-obama-conspiracy-sideshow

Let’s examine the irresponsible reporting line by line:

1. “Obama’s birth certificate is a fake, forged by the state of Hawaii”

How would anyone know. Philip Berg and many others have been requesting
to see it for months. Unlike John McCain who presented his vault copy
of his birth certificate (long form), Obama has spent hundreds of thousands
of dollars and employed an army of attorneys to avoid presenting proof he
is eligible. I haven’t heard of any lawsuit accusing the state of Hawaii
of forging a birth certificate.

2. “The decision to release the birth certificate to the well-respected
FactCheck.org Web site (which confirmed its authenticity) proves that Obama
has something to hide, since facts are untrustworthy.”

Obama has released his birth certificate to no one. A questionable COLB,
a record of birth, was placed on several websites. Factcheck.org well
respected. It depends on who you ask. Obama has longtime ties to Annenberg.
Annenberg funds Factcheck.org. See the truth about the COLB below.
 
3. “The publication of a birth announcement in the local paper 47 years ago
proves nothing”

Probably the most accurate thing written here.

4. “Even if Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and can prove it,
his father was a Kenyan, and, therefore, Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen,
despite the fact that he was born in America to an American mother.”

That is a huge question. Obama has provided no,legal proof of where he was
born. And yes, being born to a Kenyan father, a British subject does in
fact present a problem. The founding fathers had to be grandfathered in
for this very reason.

6. “Since Obama later lived in Indonesia with his mother, he actually became
an Indonesian citizen”

That part is true. Living there did not make him an Indonesian citizen but
being adopted by his step father, Lolo Soetoro, did. We now have the ultimate
verification of the adoption, Obama’s mother and Lolo Soetoro’s divorce
decree proves that Obama had been adopted.

7. “Because Obama hasn’t been willing to directly answer questions dropping
from the crazy tree”

Was this article written by someone in the Obama camp? This is a classic
Obama camp tactic of personal attacks and attempts to discredit anyone
questioniong the “messiah”, Obama.
“That last one seems to be the goal, of course, of the whole bizarre campaign,
which would be meaningless to most of us except for the fact that the U.S.
Supreme Court wasted a few minutes recently batting aside a lawsuit on the subject.”

So now the US Supreme Court is wasting time? Who are these people?
Philip Berg has two dates before the US Supreme Court and there are many others
in state courts.

It is obvious that the Virginian Pilot does not let facts get in the way of
writing an article or editorial. And to publish this nonsense in the backyard
of the fine service people living in the area. Those in the military swore an
oath to defend the US Constitution and live this oath daily. This is one of
the most irresponsible articles of publishing I have ever read.

Virginian Pilot. You are not the only newspaper that is deserving of this, but
for your flagrant disregard for the truth, the US Constitution and your readers,
you are the first newspaper to be inducted into the US Constitution Hall of
Shame. Want to make things right? Apologize to your readers and the American
public and do your job right.

By the way, is there a name associated with this editorial? I would not have
put my name on this rubbish either.

Why Obama is not eligible

What Hawaii Health Official really said

Latest information on court cases

From the Alan Keyes lawsuit

“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”

“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.”

Obama indictment, Obama must be arrested, Patrick Fitzgerald, Blagojevich arrest, December 20, 2008, Obama Rezko Levine Weinstein Blagojevich, Pay to play, Chicago corruption, US Dept of Justice, IL corruption, Chicago Tribune, Charlotte Observer

Why Barack Obama should be indicted

Part 11

One or more of the following events should happen:

  • Obama steps down.
  • Obama is forced to prove eligibility.
  • Obama is indicted and/or arrested.

If one of the above does not occur within a few months,
perhaps we should look to the Declaration of Independence
or Thomas Jefferson, for our next strategy.

The truth about the Rod Blagojevich arrest and criminal
complaint and what it means for Barack Obama.

If you are getting your news from your local newspaper or
MSM media on TV, you probably believe that Blagojevich’s
arrest was mainly about his trying to make money off of
selling Obama’s senate seat and that Obama is innocent of
any wrongdoing. That is what the MSM and the Obama camp
want you to believe. Nothing could be further from the truth.

First of all, Obama was caught lying when he stated that he
had no contact with Blagojevich. That part is clear. Now for
the important part of this article. Patrick Fitzgerald was
not ready to indict Blagojevich, but when he discovered that
Blagojevich  was trying to sell the senate seat and the Chicago
Tribune prematurely leaked the story, he hurriedly created a
criminal complaint. The investigation of Blagojevich had been
going on for many months and the sentencing of Tony Rezko
was delayed several times to allow him to talk more.

According to FBI special agent Rob Grant:

“But we do know that something big is going on. “There is a lot
of investigation that still needs to be done,”

“There are critical interviews that we have to do and
cooperation we need to get from different people.”

Obama camp coverup of Obama lies

Exerpts from the Rod Blagojevich criminal complaint

“Count One
From in or about 2002 to the present, in Cook County, in the Northern District of Illinois, defendants did,
conspire with each other and with others to devise and participate in a scheme to defraud the State of Illinois and
the people of the State of Illinois of the honest services of ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH and JOHN HARRIS, in
furtherance of which the mails and interstate wire communications would be used, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Sections 1341,1343, and 1346; all in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1349.”
“12. Because this affidavit is submitted for the limited purpose of securing a
criminal complaint and corresponding arrest warrants, I have not included each and every
fact known to me concerning this investigation.”
“a. Defendant ROD BLAGOJEVICH and at times defendant JOHN
HARRIS, together with others, obtained and attempted to obtain financial benefits for ROD
BLAGOJEVICH, members of the Blagojevich family, and third parties including Friends of
Blagojevich, in exchange for appointments to state boards and commissions, state
employment, state contracts, and access to state funds;”
“15. The remainder of this affidavit first sets out certain information obtained prior
to the initiation of the court-authorized interceptions, relating to allegations that ROD
BLAGOJEVICH solicited and obtained campaign contributions in exchange for official
actions as Governor.”

 

III. FACTS ESTABLISHING PROBABLE CAUSE
A. Evidence Concerning the Solicitation and Receipt of Campaign
Contributions in Return for Official Acts by ROD BLAGOJEVICH Prior
to October 2008
1. Information Provided by Ali Ata
Connections to Ali Ata
“16. As described in more detail in the following paragraphs, Ali Ata testified under
oath in the spring of 2008 that Ata discussed with ROD BLAGOJEVICH a potential
appointment to a high-level position with the State of Illinois while a $25,000 donation check
to Friends of Blagojevich from Ata was sitting on a table in front of ROD BLAGOJEVICH.
Ata further testified that later, after Ata made another substantial contribution to Friends of
Blagojevich, ROD BLAGOJEVICH told Ata that he was aware of the donation, that he
understood that Ata would be joining his administration, and that Ata better get a job “where
[Ata] can make some money.””

 

“17. Ata is a businessman who, in May 2008, as part of a cooperation agreement
with the government, pled guilty to making false statements to the FBI and to tax fraud.2
Pursuant to his cooperation agreement, the government has interviewed Ata extensively
regarding a number of topics, including his knowledge of and involvement in fundraising for
ROD BLAGOJEVICH. In addition, Ata testified under oath at the criminal trial of Antoin
Rezko (the “Rezko Trial”) in May 2008.3 Portions of Ata’s testimony are directly relevant
to the current investigation. In summary, and in relevant part, Ata testified as follows during
the Rezko Trial:”

 

“21. Later that year, Rezko approached Ata for additional monetary support for
ROD BLAGOJEVICH. Ata agreed to contribute $25,000 in additional monies to the
campaign of ROD BLAGOJEVICH. Ata, subsequently and by prior arrangement with
Rezko, brought a check in this amount to Rezko’s offices on Elston Avenue in Chicago.
After he arrived at Rezko’s offices, Ata was greeted by Rezko to whom he handed the check
in an envelope. Rezko, carrying the check, ushered Ata into a conference room where he met
with Rezko and ROD BLAGOJEVICH. Rezko placed the envelope containing Ata’s
$25,000 check to ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s campaign on the conference room table between
himself and ROD BLAGOJEVICH and stated to ROD BLAGOJEVICH that Ata had been
a good supporter and a team player and that Ata would be willing to join ROD
BLAGOJEVICH’s administration. ROD BLAGOJEVICH expressed his pleasure and
acknowledged that Ata had been a good supporter and good friend. ROD BLAGOJEVICH,
in Ata’s presence, asked Rezko if he (Rezko) had talked to Ata about positions in the
administration, and Rezko responded that he had.”

Connections to Joseph Cari
“26. Cari was a significant fundraiser for Democratic causes and was previously the
national finance chair for Vice President Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign. During his
testimony, Cari described meetings that he had with ROD BLAGOJEVICH, Chris Kelly,
Rezko, and Stuart Levine7. In particular, on approximately October 29, 2003, Cari, ROD
BLAGOJEVICH, Kelly, Levine and others rode on an airplane arranged by Levine to a
fundraiser in New York being hosted by Cari on behalf of ROD BLAGOJEVICH. During
the plane ride, Cari had a conversation with ROD BLAGOJEVICH. During the
conversation, Cari and ROD BLAGOJEVICH discussed Cari’s fundraising background and
work as a national fundraiser. ROD BLAGOJEVICH discussed his interest in running for
President of the United States. During the conversation, ROD BLAGOJEVICH informed
Cari that it was easier for governors to solicit campaign contributions because governors had
the ability to “award contracts” and give legal work, consulting work, and investment
banking work to campaign contributors. ROD BLAGOJEVICH informed Cari that Rezko
and Kelly were his point people in raising campaign contributions. Later in the conversation,
ROD BLAGOJEVICH told Cari that there were State of Illinois contracts and other State of
Illinois work that could be given to contributors who helped ROD BLAGOJEVICH, Rezko,
and Kelly. Cari testified that ROD BLAGOJEVICH ended the conversation with Cari by
informing Cari that Rezko and Kelly would follow up with Cari in relation to the discussion
that had just occurred.”

 

“28. Cari also testified about a conversation he had with Rezko at Rezko’s office.
Levine was also present for the conversation. According to Cari, Rezko informed Cari that
Rezko had a close relationship with the Blagojevich administration and Rezko had a role in
picking consultants and law firms and other entities to get State of Illinois business. Rezko
informed Cari that Rezko called ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s chief of staff, Lon Monk, and
Monk would help implement Rezko’s choices for certain State of Illinois work. Rezko
informed Cari that, in exchange for raising money for ROD BLAGOJEVICH, the
Blagojevich administration would be financially helpful to Cari’s business interests.”

Connections to Stuart Levine

 

“31. In approximately December 2003, the FBI began an investigation of allegations
that at least one member of the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board (the “Planning
Board”), Stuart Levine, was soliciting bribes in exchange for board action. At the time,
Levine was a businessman who served on two state boards: the board of trustees of TRS, and
the Planning Board. As part of the investigation, the government sought and obtained court
authorization to record phone calls on multiple phones used by Levine.”
“32. On May 4, 2005, Levine was indicted in United States v. Levine, et al. 05 CR
408 (Grady, J.) on 28 counts of mail and wire fraud, extortion, bribery, and money
laundering. On August 3, 2005, Levine was indicted in United States v. Levine, et al., 05 CR
691 (St. Eve., J.) on 13 counts of mail and wire fraud, bribery, and attempted extortion. On
October 27, 2006, Levine pleaded guilty to Counts One and Twenty-Three of a superseding
indictment in Case No. 05 CR 691. As part of Levine’s plea agreement, the government
moved, on November 15, 2006, to dismiss the pending superseding indictment and
indictment against Levine in Case No. 05 CR 408.”
“33. Pursuant to his cooperation agreement, the government has interviewed Levine
extensively regarding a number of topics, including his knowledge of and involvement in the
corruption of Illinois state government and fundraising for ROD BLAGOJEVICH. In
addition, Levine testified under oath at the Rezko Trial.8 Portions of Levine’s testimony at
the Rezko trial are directly relevant to the current investigation. The remainder of this
section sets forth, in summary, and in relevant part, Levine’s testimony at the Rezko Trial,
except as noted where information is specifically identified as having been obtained from
other sources:”

Levine’s Plane Ride with Blagojevich

“34. According to Levine, in approximately late October 2003, after Levine was
reappointed to the Planning Board, he shared a private plane ride from New York to Chicago
with ROD BLAGOJEVICH and Kelly. Levine, ROD BLAGOJEVICH, and Kelly were the
only passengers on the flight. According to Levine, at the beginning of the flight, Levine
thanked ROD BLAGOJEVICH for reappointing him to the Planning Board. ROD
BLAGOJEVICH responded that Levine should only talk with “Tony” [Rezko] or [Kelly]
about the Planning Board, “but you stick with us and you will do very well for yourself.”
ROD BLAGOJEVICH said this in front of Kelly. According to Levine, Levine understood
from ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s manner of speaking and words that ROD BLAGOJEVICH
did not want Levine to talk to ROD BLAGOJEVICH directly about anything to do with the
boards, but that Levine should talk to Rezko or Kelly. Levine also understood that ROD
BLAGOJEVICH meant that Levine could make a lot of money working with ROD
BLAGOJEVICH’s administration. According to Levine, ROD BLAGOJEVICH did not
seem to expect a response from Levine, and Kelly then shifted the conversation to something
else.”

Corruption of the Planning Board

(This is the subject of the Citizen Wells plea to Fitzgerald
to indict Obama)

“35. As described more fully in the following paragraphs, Mercy Hospital, which
sought permission from the Planning Board to build a hospital in Illinois, received that
permission through Rezko’s exercise of his influence at the Planning Board after Rezko was
promised that Mercy Hospital would make a substantial campaign contribution to ROD
BLAGOJEVICH. Rezko later told a member of the Planning Board that Mercy Hospital
received the permit because ROD BLAGOJEVICH wanted the organization to receive the
permit.”

“36. Levine’s criminal activities included his abuse of his position on the Planning
Board to enrich both himself and Friends of Blagojevich. The Planning Board was a
commission of the State of Illinois, established by statute, whose members were appointed
by the Governor of the State of Illinois. At the relevant time period, the Planning Board
consisted of nine individuals. State law required an entity seeking to build a hospital,
medical office building, or other medical facility in Illinois to obtain a permit, known as a
“Certificate of Need” (“CON”), from the Planning Board prior to beginning construction.”

“37. Levine, as well as Planning Board members Thomas Beck and Imad
Almanaseer, testified under oath at the Rezko Trial.9 Beck testified that he asked Rezko to
reappoint him to the Planning Board and that Beck thereafter followed Rezko’s directions
regarding which CON applications Rezko wanted approved. Beck testified that it was his
job to communicate Rezko’s interest in particular CONs to other members of the Planning
Board, including Almanaseer, who were loyal to Rezko. Beck testified that he understood
that Rezko spoke for the Blagojevich administration when Rezko spoke to Beck about
particular CONs. Almanaseer testified that Beck instructed him that Rezko wanted
Almanaseer to vote a particular way and that Almanaseer should follow Levine’s lead in
voting on CONs. Almanaseer testified that before certain Planning Board meetings, he
received notecards from Beck indicating how to vote on certain CON applications. Beck
testified he provided these notecards to Almanaseer and certain other members of the
Planning Board to communicate Rezko’s directions about certain CON applications.”

 

“38. During his testimony, Levine described a plan to manipulate the Planning
Board to enrich himself and Friends of Blagojevich. The plan centered on an entity
commonly known as Mercy Hospital (“Mercy”) that was attempting to obtain a CON to build
a new hospital in Illinois. Levine knew the contractor hired to help build the hospital. In
approximately November 2003, on behalf of the contractor, Levine checked with Rezko to
determine whether Rezko wanted Mercy to obtain its CON. Rezko informed Levine that
Mercy was not going to receive its CON. According to Levine, he asked Rezko whether it
would matter to Rezko if Mercy’s construction contractor paid a bribe to Rezko and Levine
and, in addition, made a contribution to ROD BLAGOJEVICH. Levine testified that Rezko
indicated that such an arrangement would change his view on the Mercy CON.”
“39. Levine’s testimony regarding Rezko’s actions to change the Planning Board
decision concerning Mercy’s application for a CON based on contributions for ROD
BLAGOJEVICH is confirmed by attorney Steven Loren. Loren testified at Rezko’s criminal
trial and, before that, in the grand jury.11 According to Loren, in approximately December
2003, Levine informed Loren that Rezko was against the Mercy CON. According to Loren,
Levine relayed to Loren a conversation between Rezko and Levine during which Levine
asked Rezko whether a political contribution to ROD BLAGOJEVICH would make a
difference for Mercy’s CON, and Rezko responded to Levine that such a contribution might
make a difference.”
“40. Thereafter, and confirmed by the testimony of Levine, Beck, and Almanaseer,
as well as recorded conversations, Rezko switched his directions to Beck and informed Beck
that Mercy was to receive its CON. According to Almanaseer, although he previously had
been told by Beck that Rezko did not want Mercy to receive its CON, he was later told that
there had been a change and that Rezko now wanted Mercy to receive its CON.”
“41. Mercy received its CON as a result of a controversial and irregular vote at a
public Planning Board meeting.12 The vote brought significant publicity to the Planning
Board and ultimately led to the disbanding of the Planning Board. Almanaseer testified
under oath in the grand jury that not long after the Planning Board vote on Mercy’s CON he
saw Rezko at a fundraiser. According to Almanaseer, he was still embarrassed about what
had occurred at the Planning Board vote on Mercy’s CON and Rezko’s role in the vote.
Almanaseer testified that he asked Rezko why Rezko had switched the vote on the Mercy
CON. According to Almanaseer, Rezko stated: “The Governor wanted it to pass.”
Almanaseer understood the reference to “Governor” to be a reference to ROD
BLAGOJEVICH.”

Dr. Robert Weinstein connections

“54. Numerous conversations related to the extortion were captured on the courtauthorized
wiretaps on Levine’s phones. In particular, on a recorded May 1, 2004
conversation, Levine spoke with Dr. Robert Weinstein, a co-schemer in Levine’s criminal
activities. During the call, Levine told Weinstein about his more recent meeting with Rezko
and Kelly.”

Conclusion

There is much more evidence of corruption in the complaint and
ties to Obama. The exerpts provided above reveal clear ties to
Obama and in particular his involvement in rigging the IL
Health Board.

Request to Fitzgerald to indict Obama for rigging Health Board

Citizen Wells article in April 2008 ties Obama to Rezko, Blagojevich

Citizen Wells series on why Obama should be indicted

The Chicago Tribune, in an article dated December 18, 2008
states that the following ties to Blagojevich could help to
impeach him:

“Longtime Blagojevich friend Ali Ata, in a plea bargain on charges of lying to the FBI, said that he handed $25,000 to a Blagojevich fundraiser and that the governor immediately brought up the subject of getting Ata a state job.

In another guilty plea, Joseph Cari said Blagojevich tried to enlist him as a fundraiser with the possibility of getting state contracts and legal work.”

Reasons given for Blagojevich impeachment also apply to Obama

The investigation of Rod Blagojevich has been going on for
many months. Neither Blagojevich or Obama was charged with
wrongdoing during the Rezko Trial. I have watched the methodical
well orchestrated efforts of Patrick Fitzgerald all year and it
is now obvious that Obama is next.
Remember, the Obama Camp wants you to believe that the
Blagojevich arrest was just about selling the senate seat. Obama
et al are about lies, deception and diversions. This would give
him a chance to throw another associate under the bus

Obama must be indicted

Patrick Fitzgerald rushed the criminal complaint to prevent
Blagojevich from appointing a replacement for Obama’s Senate
seat. This was prompted by the Chicago Tribune breaking the
story.

Since Fitzgerald was obligated to arrest Blagojevich early
to avoid a travesty of justice, by the same token,
a greater sense of urgency involves allowing a non eligible
candidate, Obama, with ties to corruption that equal and in
some cases exceed those of Rod Blagojevich take office.
Because of this sense of urgency and potential constitutional
crisis, Citizen Wells is urging you to contact the Dept. of
Justice and voice your concerns. Also, share this article
with as many people and websites as possible. The election
officials and courts are ignoring this crisis. Perhaps
Patrick Fitzgerald or the Dept. of Jusctice (part of the
checks and balances syetem) will save this country from
a disaster.

Hold MSM accountable
 
This article will also serve as a starting point to hold the
MSM accountable and I have decided to start with two
prominent newspapers, The Chicago Tribune and Charlotte Observer.

I am asking that the Chicago Tribune and Charlotte Observer
apologize for unprofessional, irresponsible and biased reporting.

The Charlotte Observer, in a disservice to it’s readers
and what could be considered part of a conspiracy to perpetrate
fraud, presented only articles that were favorable to
Obama and did not present articles regarding Obama’s
eligibility issues and corruption ties. Not only did the
Observer not cover Obama, they endorsed him.

The chicago Tribune presented transcripts of the Rezko trial
and even some articles critical of Obama and his ties to
corruption. However, the Tribune, despite exposing some of
Obama’s corruption ties, still endorsed him. Also, the
Tribune broke the story on Blagojevich which led to his
premature arrest. What were the reasons for the Tribune
doing this? To protect the paper or citizens from
Blagojecvich or to prevent the Obama camp from being
implicated in more corruption ties?

Readership is down for most newspapers across the country.
Younger people are not embracing outdated news delivery
and older people are fed up with biased reporting.

Attention Tribune, Observer and newspapers throughout
the country.

Apologize to your readers, the American public and
change your methodology fast or you are history.

Coming soon.

We plan to hold congressmen accountable.

Jeff Katz, Charlotte NC, WBT radio, Conservative talk radio host fired, general manager Rick Jackson, Bill White, program director, On air questions, CharlotteObserver.com article, December 3, 2008

Mark Washburn of CharlotteObserver.com has an article on the WBT radio on air question and answer segment from Tuesday, December 2, 2008.  General manager Rick Jackson and program director Bill White answered questions from callers regarding the dismissal of talk show host Jeff Katz. Citizen Wells was quoted stating “Jeff Katz was the one beacon telling the truth,” .

“WBT’s management team took over Jeff Katz’s time slot Tuesday to explain to listeners why he wouldn’t be on the air in Charlotte any more – ratings and research.”

““We made these decisions based on business,” Jackson said. “We do know collectively over time through research and ratings how people here perform.”

Station studies showed Katz had problems with the listeners, Jackson said. “We could see the fit wasn’t right here.””

“Callers offered varied opinions about Katz.

“I’m glad he’s gone,” said the first caller, Jim from Charlotte. “This guy, all he would do is the negative.”

Another complained that he disagreed with Katz and was cut off the air.

Others praised Katz for his dogged conservatism and community work. “Jeff Katz was the one beacon telling the truth,” said one listener who called himself “Citizen Wells.””

Read more here:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/597/story/389812.html

Here is the Citizen Wells response to this article:

“I was born in the middle of the state, lived most of my life in the northern part of the state and have spent more time in Charlotte the past several years. Jeff Katz was the only media person in the Charlotte area presenting the truth about Obama. In response to his being negative, don’t shoot the messenger. When I began being in Charlotte several years ago, I was appalled by the problems here. School issues dominated the news but high crime is always lurking as a major issue. Throw in lousy roads and government. You really think Katz is negative? Once again, he was the messenger.
The Charlotte area owes Jeff Katz a debt of gratitude for revealing the truth, especially about Barack Obama.
God bless Jeff Katz.”

Jeff Katz fired, WBT talk radio fires Katz, Tara Servatius replaces, December 1, 2008, Citizen Wells seeks truth about dismissal

Jeff Katz, who had a talk radio show in the afternoon after Rush Limbaugh on WBT radio in Charlotte NC, was fired on Monday, December 1, 2008. Jeff Katz was considered controversial by some, but he was one of the few locally telling the truth about Barack Obama, and trying to inform the citizens of the Charlotte area. I listened to Jeff Katz when I was able. He was a beacon of truth in a morass of lies and bias such as that emanating from the extremely biased Charlotte Observer. Many of the callers to Jeff’s show would be obnoxious or blind followers of Obama. Katz handled them as best as could be reasonably expected. Of course no one in this day and age wants the truth and no one should question the “messiah”, Obama.

Citizen Wells intends to get to the bottom of this and find out the truth about the Jeff Katz dismissal.

Stay tuned.

Jeff Katz, God bless you for the job you did. The listeners of WBT talk radio owe you a debt of gratitude.

Charlotte Observer, WBT radio, Charlotte, NC, Obama free ride, Media failure, Philip J Berg Lawsuit, Obama not eligible, Obama Indonesian, Jeff katz, Hold media accountable

American citizens hold the media accountable


This morning I kicked off a campaign to hold the American media accountable. I requested all citizens contact their local newspaper, TV stations as well as national media such as Hannity and Colmes on Fox. The media has given Barack Obama a free ride and has not covered many of the important stories about him. I decided to keep things simple and ask the media why they have not covered perhaps the biggest story of the century, the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is ineligible to be
president. Mr. Berg states primarily that irrespective of where Obama
was born, that he is still an Indonesian citizen. Obama, instead of providing a vault copy of his birth certificate or pledge of allegiance to the US, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. John McCain provided a vault copy to congress.

First some encouragement. An Ohio Fox affiliate interviewed Mr. Berg.
Watch the video:

Ohio Fox affiliate interviews Philip J Berg

Since I try to practice what I preach, I have been contacting media in NC.
For my first effort in this project, I am going to concentrate on the
largest city in NC, Charlotte.

Good news and bad news in Charlotte, NC:

First the good news. WBT radio has done a pretty good job of exposing
the real Obama. Jeff Katz has done the best job at WBT and has covered
the Philip J Berg lawsuit.

I salute WBT radio and Jeff Katz for informing the public.

Now for the bad news in Charlotte, NC:

Not only has the Charlotte Observer not covered Obama, they, in a
disgusting show of uncaring partisan politics, endorsed Obama months
ago. The bias of the Chalotte Observer is evident every day.

So, call or write the Charlotte Observer and ask why they endorsed
Obama without checking him out and why they have not covered important
news about Obama, especially the Philip J Berg lawsuit. If the
answer you receive does not impress you, reconsider your subscription
to the Observer. Also, contact the advertisers of the Observer. Explain
your concerns and that you will boycott their product if the Charlotte
Observer continues their agenda.

The Charlotte Observer has gone through waves of layoffs in the past few
years. Apparently they do not understand what their job is and who they
are supposed to serve. 
 

Although the NC Board of Elections is not the media, I contacted them
recently regarding the Philip J Berg lawsuit. I emailed them several
times and spoke to them once over the phone. I received no response
to my emails. The gentleman I spoke to had been aware of the lawsuit
for several months. He was hesitant to let me talk and instead of
really listening, mentioned the John McCain lawsuit that challenged
his citizenship. That lawsuit was dismissed.

I am putting the NC Board of Elections on notice that the people of NC
are watching. The Berg lawsuit has merit and also we are not going
to tolerate voter fraud.

Contact the media in your area and nationally and voice your concerns.

Support Philip J Berg and the lawsuit

Obama, Charlotte NC, Sunday, September 21, 2008, Protestors, Obama challenged?, Obama needs NC, Voter fraud, Acorn, VA voter fraud, ** Update **

** Update Below **

Barack Obama will be in Charlotte NC on Sunday, September 21, 2008. Obama needs to win in NC and the race is close. There are reports of voter fraud in Virginia and no doubt it will occur in NC. Obama’s payments to Acorn and his long time association with Acorn will insure that.

Will there be protestors in Charlotte?

Will anyone ask Obama tough questions?

Will anyone challenge Obama on:

  • Long time close association to Tony Rezko.
  • Campaign contributions, state grants with Robert Blackwell, Shomon.
  • Being # 2 on campaign contributions from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac.
  • Long time ties to William Ayers.
  • Long time ties to Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan.
  • Illegal trip to Kenya in 2006.
  • Philip J Berg lawsuit. Obama not qualified to be president.
  • Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama.
  • Did Obama swear allegiance to US?
  • Did Obama lie on IL bar application?
  • Did Obama  use drugs and have sex with Larry Sinclair in Nov 1999?

Citizen Wells will followup on Obama’s visit and provide an update.

** Update **

I just returned from the Obama rally in downtown Charlotte. This was a spur of the moment trip. Here are some observations:

There was a large crowd that stretched around many city blocks.

There were 10,000 reserved tickets. An unofficial estimate of the crowd was as high as 50,000. I consistently heard the people in line being told they would all be able to get in. This was not the truth.

The crowd remained orderly. The most commotion I noticed was between pro and anti abortion proponents.

I got as close as about 100 ft behind the stage. It was difficult to hear but I got some photos.

I walked quite a distance and as I was walking away, I thought about all the good people of all skin colors that have been fooled by Obama. These people want change in Washington but do not realize that the candidate they have put their confidence in is anything but the right kind of change.

I will post a new article soon and provide some photos.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama not qualified, MSM, NC media, WBT radio, Charlotte Observer, Salisbury Post, NC voters, Media has failed you

Philip J Berg filed a lawsuit in Philadephia Federal Court, and it
has been served on Barack Obama, DNC and Fec. The basis of the suit
is Obama:
Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia

The MSM has failed in their responsibility to inform the American public. The MSM has given Obama a free ride and swooned over him. The strongest voice of reason and coverage I have experienced in NC is WBT talk radio in Charlotte NC. Keith Larson and Jeff Katz have done a pretty good job of revealing the truth about Obama.

Are you aware of the lawsuit initiated by attorney Philip J Berg filed and served against Obama, the DNC and the FEC? Mr. Berg has strong reason to believe that Obama is not qualified to be president. Mr. Berg filed the suit before the Democratic Convention hoping to air the issue early enough and avoid a constitutional crisis. Are you a Hillary supporter that is just finding out about the lawsuit?

This blog, Citizen Wells, helped break this story. We have received regular updates from Philip J Berg and have done our job to inform the American public. Consider this recent comment on this blog:

“A friend just told me that her middle school aged son is using this info on a paper for a school project. Some high school newspaper is likely to break this story before the MSM!!

From Philip J Berg, Obama not qualified, Lawsuit, Federal Court, Obama not US citizen, Latest Docket entries, Answer due 9/24/2008, 2008/09/10 at 11:52 AM”

Viewership of this blog has skyrocketed and most are reading about the Philip J Berg lawsuit. This is a huge story and deserves to be presented to the American public. Is your source of information serving you? If not, ask them why they have not covered this story. Here is a recent post from this blog that is receiving a great deal of interest:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/obama-not-qualified-for-presidency-lawsuit-philip-j-berg-expedited-discovery-september-10-2008-seeks-deposition-of-barack-obama-and-howard-dean-by-end-of-month-jeff-schreiber-explains/

NC voters, consider the following:

I have contacted WBT radio on multiple occasions. Are they following up? Is the call screener biased?

I provided information on the Charlotte Observer blog. The Charlotte Observer just announced their third wave of cutbacks. I wonder why?

I contacted the Salisbury Post on several occasions. Are they covering the truth about Obama?

Earlier in the year, many newspapers in NC were contacted regarding the Larry Sinclair story.

If you believe you are not being served by your local news source, contact them, voice your displeasure and educate them.