Category Archives: Acorn voter fraud

Obama is not eligible to be POTUS, Electoral College Electors, US Senators, US Representatives, US Supreme Court, Philip J Berg lawsuit appeal, Obama not elected yet

I tried to reach Philip J Berg yesterday and will try again. I have tried
to not bother him more than is necessary. Mr. Berg has spent countless
hours in a just cause to defend and uphold the US Constitution.
The rule of law and the US Constitution must be upheld. Period. This means that no matter who is running for the office of president, mo matter what color their skin is or anything else about them, they must be eligible to be president and must, if challenged, prove their eligibility. Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. He garnered more votes in the general election due to the following reasons:

  • A well orchestrated campaign that was based on preemptive news releases designed to disarm debate, control of information in the MSM and the internet, racism, personal attacks, illegal campaign contributions and voter fraud. Obama mentioning his drug use when he was young and the Fight the Smears site are good examples.
  • Obama stole the Democrat party nomination from Hillary Clinton with the help of Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean and well documented voter fraud.
  • In one of the most well documented manifestations of racism that I have experienced in my lifetime, 95% of blacks voted for Obama. This, I believe, along with Obama camp tacttics, will set back race relations in this country 20 years.
  • The gullible youth of this country, already influenced by the far left
    wing media and college professors, fell under the spell of this Hitler
    like speaker.
  • No one was allowed to question the “messiah’, Obama. Anyone questioning Obama was viciously attacked. Good examples are the actor Jon Voight and his family and Joe the Plumber.
  • The Obama camp spent record amounts of money to buy this election. Large amounts of contributions are being investigated and we know that Obama has been backed by the likes of George Soros, Chicago and Illinois corruption money and dubious connections in the Middle East and other foreign countries.
  • Obama, the Obama Campaign and the Obama camp, have based their strategies on diversions, lies and deceit. The basis for this can be traced back to the strategies of Saul Alinsky, who cautioned not to alienate groups. Tell people anything you have to to get elected. That is exactly what Obama has done.
  • Focusing on change and using the Bush Administration as a scapegoat were repeated over and over as a brainwashing technique and rallying point. This comes straight from the playbook of Nazi Germany where a glorious new Germany (change) was promised and the Jews (scapegoats) were the cause of  all of Germany’s problems.
  • Threats of racial tensions and race riots were threatened by the Obama camp and supporters. This comes straight from the election strategy playbook of Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga and his ODM party. From the ODM election strategy:

“Ethnic Tensions/Violence as a last Resort”

“Use ODM agents on the ground to engineer ethnic tensions in target areas”

    Even with all of the chicanery above, Obama won just over one fourth of the nation’s counties. Hardly a mandate and a troubling matter for the founding fathers.
    Many people are frustrated that Barack Obama was not vetted, was given
    a free ride by the MSM and is progressing through the 2008 election cycle
    without having to prove his eligibility. The Philip J Berg lawsuit appeal
    is still before the US Supreme Court, awaiting a response from Obama and
    the DNC. Sadly it is still at the mercy of our legal system and the well
    structured requirements for legal standing and burden of proof. However,
    I maintain, that the US Constitution must be upheld and that all
    candidates must be eligible. That includes the swearing in of the new president by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the inauguration.

    The Citizen Wells blog has been providing articles for many weeks on the
    election process and the federal and state laws that control the process.
    Citizen Wells has notified the states by email and in some cases telephone
    conversations of their obligation to uphold the Constitution. This includes
    state officers such as Secretary of State, Attorney General, board of
    elections and most definitely Electoral College Electors. Citizen Wells
    has contacted officials in NC by email and telephone on multiple occasions.
    The states have varying election laws and NC even has a provision for
    qualifying candidates.

    So what can you as a concerned citizen do? Many people have asked what
    evidence they can present to their state Electoral College Electors.
    Citizen Wells will be presenting a series of articles that hopefully
    will help put the issue and evidence into focus. In the meantime, you
    can obtain a list of your states’ Electors by doing an internet search.

    I have listened to several in the media, that I used to respect, make
    comments that are disheartening. It was brought to my attention that Glenn
    Beck, when asked by a listener to respond to the birth certificate issue,
    told the listener to forget about it. How can we just forget about the
    US Constitution!!! Glenn, if you read this, please explain.

    From Jeff Screiber, legal writer for AmericasRight.com:

    “Some, like myself, are conflicted. On one hand, Obama received 63 million votes on Tuesday but, on the other hand, if Berg is correct he shouldn’t have been there in the first place. On one hand, the time for Berg’s line of thinking to be pursued should have been before November 4th so as to avoid mass voter disenfranchisement but, on the other hand, since when have the courts been concerned about voter disenfranchisement? On one hand, the United States Constitution says that Barack Hussein Obama is now president-elect of the United States of America and should be treated as such but, on the other hand, the same document also says that, should Berg be correct, he cannot serve in the position he’s slated to attain in January because he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States.”

    “Still, to me, the question presented by Berg is warranted and absolutely essential. Barack Obama should present, for independent examination, the “vault” copy of his birth certificate if for no other reason than to put this matter to rest. His failure to provide it does make me believe that he doesn’t have it, or that it doesn’t say what it should. The best way to receive closure, perhaps, is the most unlikely one — that the U.S. Supreme Court grant certiorari in this matter. Unfortunately, as the Court doesn’t like to get involved in political questions such as this, as the Court would be hesitant under any circumstances to countermand the will of 63 million Americans (give or take a few hundred thousand for ACORN), I don’t think it will happen. What we have now, unfortunately, is a widely-accepted “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and, with regard to the presidency, that’s unacceptable.”

    We must not let threats of racial tensions and race riots deter us from
    upholding the Constitution. If we cave in to pressure, we will be one step closer to being a third world country, such as Kenya, controlled by the likes of Raila Odinga, Obama’s cousin, with constant internal battles. We must uphold the US Constitution and the rule of law for all Americans, regardless of race or religion.

    I am asking fellow bloggers and concerned citizens to help defend the
    US Constitution. Contact your state Electoral College Electors and state
    Senators and Representatives. Make sure they are aware of Obama’s
    ineligibility to be president and remind them of the oath they swear to
    uphold the Constitution. Also help spread the word to your fellow citizens.
    All Barack Obama has to do, is follow the lead of John McCain and
    prove he is eligible.

    Stay tuned for more information.

    Help Philip J Berg uphold the Constitution:

    http://obamacrimes.com

    2008 Presidential Election, Obama Indonesian, Obama stole Nomination, Obama attempts to steal election, US Constitution, Electoral College Electors, Chaos, Anarchy, Electors must uphold Constitution

    US Constitution

    Tenth Amendment

    “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
    prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,
    or to the people.”

    2008 Presidential Election

    Phase II

    An Indonesian citizen, an illegal alien, with strong ties to corruption
    in Chicago, Illinois and the Middle East, has apparently won the US
    general election. Barack Obama, who stole the nomination for the Democrat
    Party using tactics of diversions, lies, illegal campaign donations,
    voter fraud and help from idiots like Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean, is
    trying to steal the election. State officials, lacking in integrity
    and knowledge of the US Constitution, and federal and state laws, allowed
    Obama to remain on the ballot despite warnings and compelling evidence
    that Obama is an Indonesian citizen, and no legal evidence that Obama is
    a US citizen. These state officials will have a day of reckoning and will
    be subject to removal from office and/or prosecution.

    Now we come to the safeguards put in place by our wise founding fathers.
    In the forefront is the Electoral College. The general election does not
    elect a president. It echoes the will of the general population and serves
    as a guideline for the Electoral College Electors to vote. State laws vary
    on how the Electors must vote. However, two things are certain:

    • The Electoral College was set up to protect the American public from
      unwise choices and in the words of Delegate Gerry on July 19, 1787:

    “The people are uninformed, and would be misled by a few designing men.”

    • Electoral College Electors swear an oath to uphold the US Constitution. Voting for a presidential candidate, faced with compelling evidence that the candidate is not eligible to be president, would be a severe violation of constitutional law. The US Constitution rules. 24 potential Electors have stated that they were filing suit demanding evidence of Obama’s eligibility.

    What happens next.

    Philip J Berg still has his appeal before the US Supreme Court. Mr. Berg
    has the burden of proof and standing. This is a safeguard built into
    lawsuits. Philip J Berg has done an outstanding job of trying to prevent
    a constitutional crisis. The Democrat party, the states and federal judges
    have put aside his plea to uphold the Constitution. The Judges, restrained
    by lawsuit protocol, have some excuse. This does not relieve anyone
    charged with upholding the Constitution of their responsibility.

    More lawsuits and voting challenges will occur, more Electoral College
    Electors will become involved and I strongly believe this country will
    be thrust into chaos, if not anarchy, for several months. Some combination
    of the Supreme Court, Federal court, state courts and Electors demanding
    proof of citizenship will come into play.

    What can you do?

    Read up on the election process, starting on this blog, and demand that your State Electoral College Electors uphold the Constitution. Follow the efforts of Philip J Berg and others to demand that the US Constitution be upheld. Regardless of any concession speeches by John McCain, we cannot allow Obama, an illegal alien, to be elected and innaugurated.

     Election Law explained and Electoral College Electors

    I will leave you with a quote by Alexander Hamilton who, like many of the founding fathers, was “afraid a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come to power.” Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers:

    “It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief.”

     

    power

    Voter fraud, November 4, 2008, Election, Fox News, Government officials, Voting rights, Acorn voter fraud, PA, FL, VA, NM, NC, CO, MO, OH, Justice Department, Fair Elections Legal Network, Government Officials, Watchdog Groups on Alert

    Fox News is covering election fraud and election problems. Here are some exerpts from a new article:

    “Expected High Voter Turnout Has Government Officials, Watchdog Groups on Alert
    The Justice Department and voting rights watchdog groups expect record voter turnout to lead to potential problems at the polls. 

    FOXNews.com

    Monday, November 03, 2008
    Government officials and voting rights watchdog groups will be keeping close watch of the polls around the country Tuesday, trying to keep lines of voters moving and to make sure that everyone can cast a ballot in what’s anticipated to be a record election turnout.

    Groups like the nonpartisan Fair Elections Legal Network are keeping a particularly watchful eye on battleground states like Ohio and Virginia.

    “The main thing that we all know is that there’s going to be a huge turnout. There are going to be long lines, and any problems that occur will exacerbate because of those lines,” said Robert M. Brandon, president of the Fair Elections Legal Network.

    “We always worry about whether there are an adequate number of resources, particularly voting machines,” Brandon said.

    On Monday, a federal judge rejected a motion filed by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People to extend voting hours and to get more voting machines sent to minority polling stations in Virginia, where 13 electoral votes are up for grabs. Fair Elections has been trying to have paper ballots sent to Virginia polling places where they fear voting machines could break down.

    “There’s a notion that if the machines all break down, they’ll call up and try to get some ballots delivered,” Brandon said. But that leads to voters walking away from long lines that aren’t moving, he said.

    The group is also concerned about high turnout and the availability of paper ballots in Ohio and Pennsylvania.

    “In general we’re looking at the states that have a lot of activity close to the elections: New Mexico, Colorado, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida,” Brandon said. “Those are the ones that we’re particularly focused on. There are other states like Nevada that will be close, but I haven’t heard of any potential problems there.””

    Read more here:

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/03/expected-high-voter-turnout-government-officials-watchdog-groups-alert/

    Help Philip J Berg uphold the Constitution:

    http://obamacrimes.com

    Read the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

    http://obamaimpeachment.org

    Barack Obama, Vote NO, November 4, 2008, Election day, Zach Jones article, Eulogy or Epiphany for America

    Zach Jones, a great American, who has done his best to reveal the truth about Obama and has helped the Citizen Wells blog in a big way, has presented an article that is a must read:

    “Eulogy or Epiphany for America

    America’s Eulogy Could Begin to Take Shape on Election Day

    Well it seems the election is upon us. It’s time to decide the direction of the United States of America for the future. Much of the world has voiced their preference and the American media has long demonstrated its preference. The first exit polls are in from Israel and they were a bit of a surprise. Reason as opposed to faith in the iconoclast seems to have ruled the day in Israel, going against the wisdom of prior polls. However, it’s too early to cheer for a possible epiphany occurring widely in the electorate.

    Nevertheless, I have high hopes that an epiphany in working America’s psyche IS taking place. What else can I do, given the alternative that a eulogy for America and her Constitution will be coming in the not too distant future? Therefore, I choose to have HOPE that a majority of Americans will search their heart of hearts and say, NO, I’m not going to put America’s future at risk with someone who in so inexperienced and unknown.

    I have hope that a majority of American’s will say, NO, I’m not going to be told who to vote for just because 90 percent of the media is in love with their fictionalized portrayal of Sen. Obama. I have hope that a majority of America’s will say, NO, I’m not going to vote for someone just because my spouse or kids may be infatuated with the illusory idea of the “One” who can solve all America’s problems – I will rely on reason as opposed to faith. I have enormous hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I am not racist just because I oppose Sen. Obama, there a hundreds of valid reasons to oppose the Senator.

    I have high hopes that a majority will say NO, I don’t want America to go down the path of becoming a socialist nation because there has never been a successful socialist nation that didn’t trample individual freedoms. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, redistribution of wealth by the government clearly puts us on the path of socialism.

    I have high hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, it is really important not to forget what we learned from 9/11; that there is a patient deadly enemy of America who is set on our destruction and imposing Islamic law worldwide. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, Sen. Obama’s inclination towards appeasement will not work to protect us from such dangerous, determined foes. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, remembering the lessons of Chamberlain’s appeasement before the start of WWII. I have hope that Americans will think about Sen. Obama’s recent possible violations the Logan Act regarding Iraq and Kenya.

    I have hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, we don’t know enough about who Sen. Obama is and we refuse to be sold a bill of goods without facts to back his narrative up. I have hopes that Americans will not suspend their common sense when analyzing Sen. Obama’s connection to ACORN and their connections to voter fraud.

    I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I’m not completely convinced that Sen. Obama has played by all the rules in this election. Why would numerous lawsuits spring up that challenge Sen. Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the President? The lawsuit Berg v. Obama being the most prominent is now filing motions in the Supreme Court. I have high hopes that a majority of Americans will say, NO, I’m not going to vote for Sen. Obama unless he steps away from his instinctual role of legal tactician and provides credible evidence to refute the allegations raised in Berg v. Obama. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, we do not want a Constitutional Crisis being the focus of our attention for the coming months.

    I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, one’s past close associations do matter in judging a candidate’s judgment, beliefs, predispositions, and goals. I have hope that a majority of Americans will say, NO, the media has not been a purveyor of sufficient or completely accurate information regarding Sen. Obama’s past associations.

    We need to know more about Sen. Obama’s past associations. We need to know much more about Rev. Wright and black theology, William Ayers and Socialism, Frank Davis and Communism, Bernadine Dorn, Rashid Khalidi, Tony Rezko, ACORN and voter fraud, Farrakhan, Father Pfleger, Larry Sinclair and sex/drugs, Robert Blackwell, Jr., Nadhmi Auchi, and many, many more. I have hope that Americans will say, NO, because they want to know who will be sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom.

    I have a determined hope that a majority of American’s will say, NO, it really is OK to be patriotic and be proud to be Americans.

    It continues to amaze me that the media has managed to accomplish their goal of having Sen. Obama on the verge of taking (not winning, since that implies playing fair) the Presidency.

    In an America where the schools are not focused on teaching American history and its system of laws and justice, why should I expect people not to be easily misled? I suppose in an America where everyone is working so hard to make ends meet, there is not enough time to teach and learn the traditions and history that have brought us this far as a people; and has guided our decisions about governance. In an America where many focus so much time on You Tube, I-Pods, the Internet, Video Games and MTV; it must be hard for people to acquire a personal awareness of American principals and understandings; those set forth in the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.

    I worry that many today see life as a big American game show with few real consequences concerning each person’s individual participation. It’s a game and each wants to be the Obama avatar created by the media as cool, hip, and inspiring; or one of his devotees. Unfortunately, it’s not a game. Each voter must look closely at their choices and realize that the consequences of making an uninformed decision cannot be undone by pushing the replay button.

    Today, the meaning of America seems to have been lost from our common lexicon. We must get it back if America is to have a long and prosperous future. Don’t get me wrong, many of us do know America; however, our numbers appear to be dwindling. A McCain Presidency will buy time to get America on the right track for all of us by bringing ethics, honesty, courage, and experience to Washington. I know the America I love and I will hold fast to my belief that America’s journey has been a noble one, not a perfect one, but a truly noble one. I’m not ready to write her eulogy and that’s why I’m voting for McCain/Palin.

    In the privacy of the voting booth exists the time and space to have an epiphany and make a sound choice for America’s future. Here’s hoping you all have a grand epiphany soon!

    Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.
    Mohandas Gandhi”

    Philip J Berg lawsuit, Fox news, US Supreme Court, Standing, New York Fox News, Obama not eligible

    Philip J Berg has been interviewed by the Fox News Channel in New York. Mr. Berg discussed the interview, his lawsuit stating that Obama is not eligible to be president and the US Supreme Court with Jeff Schreiber. Here are some exerpts:

    “I spoke with Philip Berg this afternoon as he sat in his office, awaiting a crew from Fox News Channel in New York. While interest in his lawsuit among those at Fox has been steadily mounting over the past few days and weeks, Berg does not know exactly in what capacity the end product of the taping will be used.

    “At this point,” Berg said, “the nation just needs to know that Mr. Obama is not eligible to serve as president of the United States, that he has so far successfully hidden behind procedure, and that we could very well be headed toward a constitutional crisis unless this is addressed.”

    And he is indeed working toward ensuring that the issue is addressed, Berg said, and has been spending the past few days preparing for his appeal to the United States Supreme Court, a move which could happen by the end of the week. This, of course, has caused him to shift other items to the proverbial back burner, including but not limited to the so-called Michelle Obama tapes purportedly possessed by editorial staff at African Press International.”

    “In the unlikely event, though, that four of the nine Supreme Court Justices decide to hear the case, Berg will first have to establish that, contrary to the arguments put forth by Barack Obama and the DNC and the specifics of the decision rendered by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, he indeed has standing to sue. As I’ve pointed out in these pages before, the standing doctrine as it stands today does not bode well for Philip Berg.

    To have standing, a plaintiff must satisfy a three-prong test. He or she must prove (1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3) redressibility — that they’ve sustained more than just general harm, that the harm can be traced to the conduct of the defendant, and that adjudication of the matter can provide a remedy to that harm. Berg’s biggest hurdle, so far, has been establishing injury in fact.”

    “In the past, the United States Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff must have a “personal stake” in the matter being adjudicated. This, of course, is to ensure that the matter belongs before the court in the first place. More recently, however, the Court has paid greater attention to, and awarded standing for, plaintiffs who can show enough of an injury so as to provide something along the lines of a good contest among legal rivals.”

    Read more here:

    http://www.americasright.com/

    Help Philip J Berg defend the Constitution:

    http://obamacrimes.com

    Obama born in Kenya, Obama Indonesian, Obama illegal alien, State election officials, Board of elections, Electors, US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws, Will Electoral College Electors vote for illegal alien?

    Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Documented.

    Barack Obama became an Indonesian citizen. Documented.

    Barack Obama is an illegal alien. Documented.

    No illegal alien has ever been on the US presidential ballot. Documented.

    The US Constitution states the qualifications for president.

    The US Constitution rules.

    Federal Election Law: 

    “The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):

    § 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

    State example: Pennsylvania Law

    “§ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
    The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

    Any state official, Governor, Lt Governor, Attorney General, Secretary
    of State, Election Board Official. If you think you are absolved of
    responsibility and are holding the DNC responsible, you are wrong. Many of you have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution. You may be subject to impeachment, expulsion and legal action. You have a duty to the US Constitution and the people of your state.

    State election officials from the Secretaries of State and Election Boards
    have been quoted as saying they take their cue from the DNC for candidates
    placed on the ballot. That does not absolve them of responsibility.
    They are bound to uphold the Constitution. These officials have been
    forewarned. It is their duty to ensure that no voter in their state
    is disenfranchised.

    Electoral College Electors, knowingly voting for an ineligible candidate, will be violating the Constitution.
    Woe to anyone with election powers, clinging to tradition, and blaming
    the DNC for not vetting Obama. You have no excuse and will be held accountable.

    US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws

    Obama ineligible, Obama born in Kenya, Obama Indonesian, US Constitution, States, Secretary of State, Board of Elections, Electors, States must uphold US Constitution, 2008 Election

    “In late December 1783, when General Washington resigned as commander in chief, he visited the Continental Congress for the last time…. General Washington read a brief statement praising the officers and soldiers of the Continental Army for their eight years of service. He also commended “our dear country to the protection of Almighty God.” As he said these words, his voice broke and tears streamed down the general’s cheeks and he was unable to speak for a full minute.”

    From “Washington’s Secret War” by Thomas Fleming

    “The collective wisdom of the founding fathers astounds me.”

    Citizen Wells 

    2008 Presidential Election

      States must uphold US Constitution

      

     

    The DNC, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, et al ramroded Obama through the
    DNC Convention and nomination.

    Obama stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton. Documented evidence
    reveals widespread voter fraud involving Acorn and the Obama camp in
    the primaries and general election.

    Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. He was born in Kenya and
    became an Indonesian citizen. Obama is still Indonesian and is an illegal alien. There is ample proof of this and more is being revealed. Obama has failed to repudiate these facts.

    Election officials and Electors in all 50 states and DC will be held
    accountable to uphold the US Constitution
    .

    The Philip J Berg lawsuit will be taken to the Supreme court if necessary. Lawsuits are constrained by the level of proof placed on the plaintiff.
    However, there is no such standard for those bound to uphold the
    Constitution. Those swearing an oath of allegiance to the Constitution are being forewarned that with the oath comes a responsibility  and a higher level of recourse for violation of that oath. Consider the following:

    High Crimes and Misdemeanors

    Citizen Wells will be contacting the secretary of state or commonwealth
    in all states and will email the following article that reveals the duties to uphold the Constitution:

    US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws 

    Each state will be notified of the article and the fact that they will be
    held accountable. Taking their cue from the Democratic party or other
    excuses will not be accepted. Each person sworn to uphold the Constitution will be personally held accountable. Citizen Wells also urges the citizens of each state to make known their desire to uphold the Constitution.

    Below is a list of the 50 states and DC. As each state is contacted, this
    article will be updated. Please comment with your information and concerns
    about your state election officials and electors.

    Alabama Emailed 10/27/08

    Alaska Email 10/27/08

    Arizona Email 10/28/08

    Arkansas Email 10/27/08

    California Email 10/27/08

    Colorado Email 10/27/08

    Connecticut Email 10/27/08

    Delaware Email 10/28/08

    Florida Telephone/email 10/27/08, Florida response – see comment below

    Georgia Email 10/28/08

    Hawaii Email 10/27/08

    Idaho Email 10/27/08

    Illinois

    Indiana Email 10/28/08

    Iowa Email 10/28/08

    Kansas Email 10/28/08

    Kentucky Email 10/28/08

    Louisiana Email 10/28/08

    Maine Email 10/28/08

    Maryland Email 10/28/08

    Massachusetts Email 10/28/08

    Michigan Email 10/28/08

    Minnesota Email 10/27/08

    Mississippi Email 10/28/08

    Missouri Email 10/27/08

    Montana Email 10/28/08

    Nebraska Email 10/28/08

    Nevada Email 10/28/08

    New Hampshire Email 10/28/08

    New Jersey Email 10/28/08

    New Mexico Email 10/27/08

    New York Email 10/28/08

    North Carolina Telephone/email 10/27/08

    North Dakota Email 10/28/08

    Ohio Email 10/28/08

    Oklahoma Email 10/28/08

    Oregon Email 10/28/08

    Pennsylvania Telephone/email 10/27/08

    Rhode Island Email 10/28/08

    South Carolina Email 10/28/08

    South Dakota Email 10/28/08

    Tennessee Email 10/28/08

    Texas Email 10/28/08

    Utah Email 10/28/08

    Vermont Email 10/28/08

    Virginia    

    Washington Email 10/28/08

    West Virginia Email 10/28/08

    Wisconsin Email 10/27/08

    Wyoming Email 10/28/08

    Dictrict of Columbia

     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     

     

     

    Obama not eligible to be president, US Constitution, Obama born in Kenya, Obama is Indonesian, Secretary of State, Board of elections, Electors, Accountable, Uphold Constitution, Citizen Wells to American public

    “Our Constitution is in actual operation; everything appears to promise
    that it will last; but nothing in this world is certain but death and
    taxes.”

    Benjamin Franklin

    “A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high
    duties of a good (officer), but it is not the highest. The laws of
    necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger,
    are of higher obligation.”

    Thomas Jefferson

    “The ballot is stronger than the bullet.”

    Abraham Lincoln

    Up to this point, the political parties and the individual states have been in control of the election process. The state boards of elections, in conjunction  with the major political parties have controlled which candidates will be on the ballots. However, the US Constitution still rules and just beneath that the Federal election laws rule. The states have control over their respective elections and electors, but are still governed by federal law.

    Several weeks ago, Citizen Wells contacted the NC State Board of Elections.
    After a brief phone call dominated by the Board of Elections staff member,
    Citizen Wells was told that they had been aware of the Philip J Berg
    lawsuit for several months and that they took their cue from the
    Democratic Party regarding Obama’s eligibility. Once again, the US
    Constitution rules and we will hold the NC State Board of Elections
    accountable.

    Once the individual state electors meet on December 15, 2008, the Federal
    Government takes control of the process. Lawsuits in courts require
    the burden of proof on the part of the plaintiff. This burden is not necessary
    for those charged with upholding and defending the Constitution.
    Consider the following:

    Both John McCain and Barack Obama are US Senators. When they took office they spoke the following pledge:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW

    “The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):”

    “§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

    Pennsylvania Law

    “§ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
    The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

    NC Law

    “At the first meeting held after new appointments are made, the members of the State Board of Elections shall take the following oath:

    “I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, and that I will well and truly execute the duties of the office of member of the State Board of Elections according to the best of my knowledge and ability, according to law, so help me, God.””
    “§ 163-114.  Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring after nomination and before election.

    If any person nominated as a candidate of a political party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary) dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the following instructions:
    Position

    President 

    Vacancy is to be filled by appointment of national executive
    committee of political party in which vacancy occurs”

    This is not a situation where Obama is on trial and the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.

    The government of the US has not filed a lawsuit with the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff.

    Barack Obama is running for the office of president of the US, This is no different than applying for any other job involving competition.
    As in any other situation involving a job application, the burden of
    proof regarding qualification to hold office, falls on Obama. The
    rules are spelled out in the US Constitution. The preponderance of
    evidence reveals that Obama was born in Kenya, became an Indonesian
    citizen and is in fact an illegal alien. Those who choose to ignore
    these facts and allow Obama to proceed are violating the law and
    will be held accountable.

    Regardless of how the Philip J Berg lawsuit plays out, the US Constitution
    must be upheld. Many people involved in the election process are
    charged with upholding the US Constitution and will be held accountable.
    This article will be emailed to the Secretary of State in each state
    after a phone call to explain that the citizens are watching them. The
    individual electors will also be held accountable. The Citizen Wells
    blog will also create an accountability page for each state and will
    provide feedback on how each state cooperates with the letter and spirit
    of the Constitution.

    I urge all of you to contact your Secretary of State and Board of Elections
    in your state. Let them know you do not want an illegal alien on the
    ballot or voted for by state electors. While you are at it, let them
    know that voter fraud will not be tolerated. Let us know about the level
    of concern and cooperation in your state.

    The Philip J Berg lawsuit Timeline can be accessed at the top of this blog.

    Judge Surrick Dismisses Berg lawsuit, Philip J Berg, Jeff Schreiber analysis

    Judge Surrick dismissed the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is Indonesian and not eligible to be president. Jeff Schreiber has provided some information on Judge Surrick’s ruling:

    “Saturday, October 25, 2008
    Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
     
    The order came down at approximately 6:15 p.m. on Friday. Philip Berg’s lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States had been dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lacked standing.

    Surrick, it seemed, was not satisfied with the nature of evidence provided by Berg to support his allegations.
    Various accounts, details and ambiguities from Obama’s childhood form the basis of Plaintiff’s allegation that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States. To support his contention, Plaintiff cites sources as varied as the Rainbow Edition News Letter … and the television news tabloid Inside Edition. These sources and others lead Plaintiff to conclude that Obama is either a citizen of his father’s native Kenya, by birth there or through operation of U.S. law; or that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia by relinquishing his prior citizenship (American or Kenyan) when he moved there with his mother in 1967. Either way, in Plaintiff’s opinion, Obama does not have the requisite qualifications for the Presidency that the Natural Born Citizen Clause mandates. The Amended Complaint alleges that Obama has actively covered up this information and that the other named Defendants are complicit in Obama’s cover-up.”

     

    “So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.

    If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”

     

    “Berg’s attempts to distinguish his own case from Hollander were deemed by Judge Surrick to be “[h]is most reasonable arguments,” but his arguments citing statutory authority were said by the judge to be a venture “into the unreasonable” and were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.” All in all, the judge wrote, it was the satisfaction of the injury-in-fact requirement which was the problem. Berg’s harm was simply too intangible.

    …regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election.

    Berg, disappointed by the decision, plans to appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and then to the United States Supreme Court.

    “This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution,” Berg said. “If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States–the most powerful man in the entire world–is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?””

    Read more here:

    http://www.americasright.com/

    The Constitution must be upheld.

    Citizen Wells will post an article in the next 48 hours with an action plan.

    Philip J Berg lawsuit, Judge Surrick dismissed, October 24, 2008 ruling, Philadelphia Daily News

    The Philadelphia Daily News has stated that Judge Surrick has ruled on the Philip J Berg Lawsuit. Judge Surrick allegedly ruled on the lawsuit last night, October 24, 2008. I have it on authority that the writer of the article, Michael Hinkelman, is a “rabid Obama supporter.” Mr Hinkelman does indeed publish gross inaccuracies (lies where I come from) about the case. The informed reader will immediately spot them.

    Go ahead and read the biased account from the Philadelphia Daily News, the same newspaper that did not touch this story until the case was dismissed, and then read a more factual, authoritative account here:

    http://www.americasright.com/

    Here are some exerpts from the article:

    “Posted on Sat, Oct. 25, 2008
    Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
    By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
    Philadelphia Daily News

    hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

    A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
    Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

    Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

    He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

    U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

    Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

    They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

    Surrick agreed.

    In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.”

    Read more here:

    http://www.philly.com/dailynews

    Here are Citizen Wells’ thoughts on the ruling:

    • The US Constitution rules. Judge Surrick is bound to uphold the Constitution.
    • Thousands of voters were disenfranchised during the Democratic Primaries.
    • Thousands more voters will be disenfranchised if Obama is allowed to remain on the ballot.
    • As the election progresses, control of the election process will shift from the states to the Federal Government. The following officials will be bound to uphold the Constitution:
    1. Secretary of State of each state.
    2. Election Board Officials.
    3. Electors.
    4. Governors.
    5. Judges.
    • All of the above officials will be held accountable.
    • Taking a cue from the Democratic Party will not be a valid excuse for not upholding the Constitution and allowing Obama, an illegal alien, to remain on the ballot or be voted for by electors.

    Philip J Berg will appeal Judge Surrick’s decision and take the case to the Supreme Court if necessary. The Citizen Wells blog will produce an article soon to help clarify how the Constitution must be upheld. In conjunction with the American public, we will hold all responsible for the election, accountable.

    Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

    http://obamaimpeachment.org