“Our Constitution is in actual operation; everything appears to promise
that it will last; but nothing in this world is certain but death and
taxes.”
Benjamin Franklin
“A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high
duties of a good (officer), but it is not the highest. The laws of
necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger,
are of higher obligation.”
Thomas Jefferson
“The ballot is stronger than the bullet.”
Abraham Lincoln
Up to this point, the political parties and the individual states have been in control of the election process. The state boards of elections, in conjunction with the major political parties have controlled which candidates will be on the ballots. However, the US Constitution still rules and just beneath that the Federal election laws rule. The states have control over their respective elections and electors, but are still governed by federal law.
Several weeks ago, Citizen Wells contacted the NC State Board of Elections.
After a brief phone call dominated by the Board of Elections staff member,
Citizen Wells was told that they had been aware of the Philip J Berg
lawsuit for several months and that they took their cue from the
Democratic Party regarding Obama’s eligibility. Once again, the US
Constitution rules and we will hold the NC State Board of Elections
accountable.
Once the individual state electors meet on December 15, 2008, the Federal
Government takes control of the process. Lawsuits in courts require
the burden of proof on the part of the plaintiff. This burden is not necessary
for those charged with upholding and defending the Constitution.
Consider the following:
Both John McCain and Barack Obama are US Senators. When they took office they spoke the following pledge:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW
“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):”
“§ 8. The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”
Pennsylvania Law
Ҥ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”
NC Law
“At the first meeting held after new appointments are made, the members of the State Board of Elections shall take the following oath:
“I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, and that I will well and truly execute the duties of the office of member of the State Board of Elections according to the best of my knowledge and ability, according to law, so help me, God.””
Ҥ 163-114. Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring after nomination and before election.
If any person nominated as a candidate of a political party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary) dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the following instructions:
Position
President
Vacancy is to be filled by appointment of national executive
committee of political party in which vacancy occurs”
This is not a situation where Obama is on trial and the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.
The government of the US has not filed a lawsuit with the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff.
Barack Obama is running for the office of president of the US, This is no different than applying for any other job involving competition.
As in any other situation involving a job application, the burden of
proof regarding qualification to hold office, falls on Obama. The
rules are spelled out in the US Constitution. The preponderance of
evidence reveals that Obama was born in Kenya, became an Indonesian
citizen and is in fact an illegal alien. Those who choose to ignore
these facts and allow Obama to proceed are violating the law and
will be held accountable.
Regardless of how the Philip J Berg lawsuit plays out, the US Constitution
must be upheld. Many people involved in the election process are
charged with upholding the US Constitution and will be held accountable.
This article will be emailed to the Secretary of State in each state
after a phone call to explain that the citizens are watching them. The
individual electors will also be held accountable. The Citizen Wells
blog will also create an accountability page for each state and will
provide feedback on how each state cooperates with the letter and spirit
of the Constitution.
I urge all of you to contact your Secretary of State and Board of Elections
in your state. Let them know you do not want an illegal alien on the
ballot or voted for by state electors. While you are at it, let them
know that voter fraud will not be tolerated. Let us know about the level
of concern and cooperation in your state.
The Philip J Berg lawsuit Timeline can be accessed at the top of this blog.
Citizen WElls 
“Regardless of how the Philip J Berg lawsuit plays out, the US Constitution
must be upheld. ” Thank you so much for taking this position!
Thank you CW for your outstanding work!
You are a wonderful American, helping all of us understand the laws and how they are applied. The Constitution is our most precious document!
Citizen McCain for President!
What can we all do. I am very upset about this Judge dismissing this. Doesn’t it matter if a Presidential Candidate has lied about who he is? Who may not be a citizen of the United States, yet he wants to be our Commander in Chief?
This is absolutely outrageous!! What is everyone affraid of – challenging Barack Obama? Look at all of Obama’s questionable associations. ACORN is a fraudulent organization; that Obama has very deep connections to. He’s on film making speeches to them, he’s been their legal counsel, he’s been their trainer. This is all documented. This alone is enough to disqualify this man!!!
My God, are we living on another planet? Is our country being taken over by foreigners before our eyes?
The Judge says the Congress has the say in what is to be done with Obama. THIS CURRENT CONGRESS…THIS CORRUPT CONGRESS??
THE VERY CONGRESS WHO IS GUILTY OF THE FRAUDULENT FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC – BOGUS BONUS MONEY AND PUT AMERICANS IN THIS FINANCIAL MESS??
OMG.. I MUST BE LIVING A NIGHTMARE.
CW I just picked this up on hillbuzz long read but worth every word!
October 25, 2008
Read every last word of this – and send it to all your friends. ESPECIALLY the part about the vile Samantha Power (aka The Most Dangerous Woman in the World)
Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized
Is America really going to do this?
by Michelle Phillips, Spectator.co.uk
The impact of the financial crisis on the American presidential election has somewhat obscured the most important reason why the prospect of an Obama presidency is giving so many people nightmares. This is the fear that, if he wins, US defences will be emasculated at a time of unprecedented international peril and the enemies of America and the free world will seize their opportunity to destroy the west.
Personally, I don’t give any credence to the ‘support’ for one candidate over the other that has been expressed by the enemies of civilisation (Iran and Hamas ‘support’ Obama, while an al Qaeda blogger ‘supports’ McCain). Their agenda is simply to sow confusion and promote American recriminations and disarray. Nor do I set much store by many of the remarks made by either candidate during the latter stages of this election campaign, since under this kind of pressure both will now say pretty much anything to win it. The New York Times has run a useful analysis of the candidates’ foreign policy campaign statements which shows how Obama has carefully tacked to the ‘hard power’ agenda while McCain has in turn nodded towards ‘soft power’.
No, the only way to assess their position is to look at each man in the round, at what his general attitude is towards war and self-defence, aggression and appeasement, the values of the west and those of its enemies and – perhaps most crucially of all – the nature of the advisers and associates to whom he is listening. As I have said before, I do not trust McCain; I think his judgment is erratic and impetuous, and sometimes wrong. But on the big picture, he gets it. He will defend America and the free world whereas Obama will undermine them and aid their enemies.
Here’s why. McCain believes in protecting and defending America as it is. Obama tells the world he is ashamed of America and wants to change it into something else. McCain stands for American exceptionalism, the belief that American values are superior to tyrannies. Obama stands for the expiation of America’s original sin in oppressing black people, the third world and the poor.
Obama thinks world conflicts are basically the west’s fault, and so it must right the injustices it has inflicted. That’s why he believes in ‘soft power’ — diplomacy, aid, rectifying ‘grievances’ (thus legitimising them, encouraging terror and promoting injustice) and resolving conflict by talking. As a result, he will take an axe to America’s defences at the very time when they need to be built up. He has said he will ‘cut investments in unproven missile defense systems’; he will ‘not weaponize space’; he will ‘slow our development of future combat systems’; and he will also ‘not develop nuclear weapons,’ pledging to seek ‘deep cuts’ in America’s arsenal, thus unilaterally disabling its nuclear deterrent as Russia and China engage in massive military buildups.
McCain understands that an Islamic war of conquest is being waged on a number of diverse fronts which all have to be seen in relation to each other. For Obama, however, the real source of evil in the world is America. The evil represented by Iran and the Islamic jihadists is apparently all America’s fault. ‘A lot of evil’s been perpetuated based on the claim that we were fighting evil,’ he said. Last May, he dismissed Iran as a tiny place which posed no threat to the US — before reversing himself the very next day when he said Iran was a great threat which had to be defeated. He has also said that Hezbollah and Hamas have ‘legitimate grievances’. Really? And what might they be? Their grievances are a) the existence of Israel b) its support by America c) the absence of salafist Islam in the world. Does Obama think these ‘grievances’ are legitimate?
To solve world conflict, Obama places his faith in the UN club of terror and tyranny, which is currently fuelling the murderous global demonisation of Israel for having the temerity to defend itself and is even now preparing for a rerun of its own anti-Jew hate-fest of Durban 2, which preceded 9/11 by a matter of days.
McCain understands that Israel is the victim rather than the victimiser in the Middle East, that it is surrounded by genocidal enemies whose undiminished intention is to destroy it as a Jewish state, and that is both the first line of defence against the Islamist attack on the free world and its most immediate and important target.
Obama dismisses the threat from Islamism, shows zero grasp of the strategic threat to the region and the world from the encirclement of Israel by Iran, displays a similar failure to grasp the strategic importance of Iraq, thinks Israel is instead the source of Arab and Muslim aggression against the west, believes that a Palestinian state would promote world peace and considers that Israel – particularly through the ‘settlements’ – is the principal obstacle to that happy outcome. Accordingly, Obama has said he wants Israel to return to its 1967 borders – actually the strategically indefensible 1948 cease-fire line, known accordingly as the ‘Auschwitz borders’.
Obama would thus speak to Iran’s genocidal mullahs without preconditions on his side (the same mullahs have now laid down their own preconditions for America: pull all US troops out of the Middle East, and abandon support for ‘Zionist’ Israel) but has said he would have problems dealing with an Israeli government headed by a member of Israel’s Likud Party. In similar vein, it is notable that Obama opposed the congressional resolution labelling the Iranian Revolutionary Guards a terrorist organization, which passed the Senate by a wide margin with support from both parties. And had he had his way, there would have been no ‘surge’ in Iraq and America would instead have run up the white flag, with the incalculable bloodbath and strengthening of the jihad that would have followed.
Obama assumes that Islamic terrorism is driven by despair, poverty, inflammatory US policy and the American presence on Muslim soil in the Persian Gulf. Thus he adopts the agenda of the Islamists themselves. This is not surprising since many of his connections suggest that that the man who may be elected President of a country upon which the Islamists have declared war is himself firmly in the Islamists’ camp. Daniel Pipes lists Obama’s extensive connections to Islamists in general and the Nation of Islam in particular, and concludes with this astounding observation:
Obama’s multiple links to anti-Americans and subversives mean he would fail the standard security clearance process for Federal employees. Islamic aggression represents America’s strategic enemy; Obama’s many insalubrious connections raise grave doubts about his fitness to serve as America’s commander-in-chief.
The hatred that these Islamist connections entertain towards Israel is reflected amongst Obama’s own advisers. With one notable exception in Dennis Ross, whose late arrival in Camp Obama suggests a cosmetic exercise designed to allay alarm among Israel supporters, his advisers are overwhelmingly not only hostile to Israel but perpetrate the loathesome canard that Jews have too much power over American policy.
The former Carter adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, for example, not only denounced Israel’s war against Hezbollah thus:
I think what the Israelis are doing today [2006] for example in Lebanon is in effect– maybe not in intent – the killing of hostages
but also supports Mearsheimer and Walt’s notorious smear that the Jews have subverted America’s foreign policy in the interests of Israel. Merrill McPeak, vice chairman of Obama’s campaign and his chief military adviser, has similarly blamed problems in the Middle East on the influence of people who live in New York City and Miami (guess who) whom no ‘politician wants to run against’ and who he says exercise undue influence on America’s foreign affairs. Most revolting of all is Samantha Power, a very close adviser whom Obama fired for calling Hillary a ‘monster’ but who says she still expects to be in Obama’s administration. Not only has Power has advocated the ending of all aid to Israel and redirecting it to the Palestinians, but she has spoken about the need to land a ‘mammoth force’ of US troops in Israel to protect the Palestinians from Israeli attempts at genocide (sic) — and has complained that criticism of Barack Obama all too often came down to what was ‘good for the Jews’.
There are, alas, many in the west for whom all this is music to their ears. Whether through wickedness, ideology, stupidity or derangement, they firmly believe that the ultimate source of conflict in the world derives at root from America and Israel, whose societies, culture and values they want to see emasculated or destroyed altogether. They are drooling at the prospect that an Obama presidency will bring that about. The rest of us can’t sleep at night.
http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/#comments
PLEASE READ QUICK
This is OUTRAGEOUS… You are right..It does appear the Congress has the final say as to the eligibility of a candidate. pfff But there are a few reasonable Senators and Representatives there that I will contact as well as my New Jersey Secretary of State.
Savage used my Part II youtube video on his website…Part I and Part II
Judge Surrick “Received” the Decision He Issued.
Points to Ponder:
(1) Why was the PACER system “links” in the Berg v. Obama docket disabled just MOMENTS before the decision was faxed out? Is it possible that the Judge had actually issued a DIFFERENT ruling, and was FORCED to issue the one that was sent to him?
(2) Does this explain the comments from the Obama camp all through Friday the 24th that ALL Obstacles to the White House had been overcome, and “they now had a clear path.”
http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/
Read the Supreme Court sentence in advance
http://illuminati-religion.blogspot.com/2008/10/barry-soetoro-aka-messiah-barack.html
The SCOTUS will be glad to hear this appeal because it’s an unprecendented opportunity to interpret the original framers’ qualifications requirement for an individual wanting to become POTUS. This is a win-win situation because it will be big news (SCOTUS reviewing the appeal) and Obama will be in an undesirable position to try to defend his efforts to have the case dismissed instead of producing the BC.
“As in any other situation involving a job application, the burden of
proof regarding qualification to hold office, falls on Obama. ”
As far as the federal government is concerned, Obama has already proven he’s a citizen. If he hadn’t done so, he wouldn’t be running.
“This is not a situation where Obama is on trial and the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.”
Yes, it is. Philip J. Berg is suing Barack Obama. The burden of proof is on Berg to prove that Obama is not a citizen of the United States. As I said before, the federal elections people have already determined to their satisfaction that Obama is a citizen. It’s Berg’s job to bring forth some hard evidence that disputes that claim.
Berg, so far, hasn’t produced any evidence, only conjecture. That’s why his lawsuit got dismissed. If/when he comes up with some proof, then what he says will be considered seriously.
You are right that the Constitution must be upheld, but the fact is that the government believes that it is being upheld.
I hope you will post this, as I have tried to be reasonable, logical and not mean. =/
Also, you live in North Carolina? I do, too! =)
You might reread it a couple of times.
The article refers to Obama running for office and upholding the Constitution irrespective of any lawsuits.
So, your ok with an illegal alien being president?
http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1611
McCain is making significant gains due to his economic plans.
Obama’s plans to raise taxes is akin to extracting crops from a field that is depleted, impoverished and cannot yield.
McCain’s aims are to replenish the field and this is why he is winning. Working class Americans know they have little if anything to give.
http://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/over-300-professional-economists-including-nobel-prize-winners-endorse-mccains-economic-plan-as-democrats-try-to-seize-all-401k-plans-in-america-and-obama-birth-certificate-state-lawsuits-mushroom/
Its no surprise that 300 economists, 5 of whom are Nobel prize winners endorse McCain’s plans.
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/hey-eeyores-another-take-on-those-polls/
This is why IBD/TIPP is the only poll worth looking at. It was the most accurate by 0.4% in the last election.
BTW this article is by an Obama supporter.
I also put this post up on the military thread I maintain. Thanks for all you do CitizenWells.
Saw this new theory yet?
http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/
Citizen Wells,
I’ve followed this case with interest as an outsider and it always stuck me there was an element of showboasting in Berg’s case. I do believe he has something though, I know through contects here is Britain there are a lot of question marks over Comrade Obama.
I trust you and other bloggers will say on the case and pressure Berg and others to publish what they have. That way public outcry can ensure that whatever threats have been made about what might happen if Obama does not win the people responsible for the post-election process do their job.
According to recent polls however his lead appears to be crumbling so covering his arse for him will not serve any purpose.
The “government” did NOT check Obama’s birth certificate.
How about hundreds of voters and the GOP joining Berg in an emergency action so that “standing” will not be an issue?
Good day CW,
This is off topic, but very important.
PBS has an online poll posted asking if Sarah Palin is qualified. Apparently the left wing knew about this in advance and are flooding the voting with NO votes.
The poll will be reported on PBS and picked up by mainstream media. It can influence undecided voters in swing states.
Please do two things — takes 20 seconds.
1) Click on link and vote YES!
Here’s the link: http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
2) Then send this to every McCain-Palin supporter you know, and urge them to vote and pass it on.
Action you can take on Birth Certificate Issue.
We have a constitution crisis on our hands her is what you can do
Unknown to most Citizen it is your duty to report Criminal or suspected Criminal Activity to your FBI.
There have been well over a hundred million inquiries about Obama’s “missing “Vault Copy of his Birth Certificate.
These Citizens need to file a crime tip to your FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The form is simple and easy to fill out.
Trust me the FBI will get the message. Lets get their attention and be good Ciotozens in the process.
Report a case of Interstate Fraudulent Campaign Activity.
Nature of Crime both committed and continuing to be committed
Since Obama and DNC will not produce a Vault Copy of Obama’s Birth Certificate and since there exists a Constitutional Requirement for holding the Office of the US President, is that the US President be must Natural Born Citizen then based on the previous facts Obama and the DNC are engaged in an Interstate Act of Fraudulent Activity including: Solicitation of several hundred million US dollars and are attempting to willfully and knowingly violate the United States Constitution by attempting to elect and unqualified Candidate, Obama.
Evidence
Berg v Obama Third Judicial District (Establishes DNC and Obama are aware of Vault Birth Certificate has not been released and the Natural Born Citizen Requiement)
Obama and DNC refuse to release a Vault copy of Obama’s Birth Certificate.
Obama was physically in the State Of Hawaii on October 23 and 24 allowing reasonable opportunity to obtain a Vault copy of his Birth Certificate.
Substantial Questions about the Obama Campaign Internet copy of Obama’s supposed Birth Certificate.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html
ACORN Voter Fraud establishes a “Criminal” Environment in and around the DNC and the Obama Campaign.
You can file your crime tip at this link. Help Save America.
FBI Tips and Public Leads
https://tips.fbi.gov/
GOOD JOB – CW …. Your Philip Berg vs Obama Lawsuit Posting Efforts Are Paying Off…
Poll (42,000+ votes) of Week of
~~~~ Oct. 24 – Oct. 31, 2008 ~~~~
Candidate / Per Cent / # Votes
———– ———- ——–
McCain…………70%………30,487
Obama…………28%………12,089
Barr……………….1%………….412
Nader……………..1%………….121
Other……………..0%………….258
( http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/10/24/aol-straw-poll-oct-24-31/ )
Does anyone else view this dismissal as ‘passing the buck’? Facts are facts. If he has nothing to hide or be concerned about, WHY NOT JUST PRODUCE the documents requested, vault version of BC, certificate of citizenship, and certificate of Oath of allegiance? Regardless of the suit, the issue is still before us as to avoiding the request being determined as suspicious. I feel certain that Mr. Berg will prevail in one way or another.
On another issue that I heard about on CNN HL news this morning: Voter Suppression. Several people received letters in GA advising them that they are not eligible to vote in the election because their records don’t match up to information provided at registration (?) showing them as a citizen. A 21yr. old, born in Boston, MA, was interviewed and very concerned how this could happen. The voter registration department, rightly states that the verification process is necessary but has its flaws i.e. prone to manipulation, prone to error, and knocks out those who may try to present false information in order to qualify to vote. OK, I understand the reasoning but this should have been done when they registered not 2 weeks before the election. Apparently, their votes will be ‘saved’ and included in the count once re-verified. HELLO, that would create a nightmare up until inauguration. WE CAN DO BETTER than this. WE MUST do better if we want to have ANY confidence in our election system. p.s. I’m not totally sure I got every detail exactly right, but you get the deal. Google it and see for yourself. I just wanted to throw it in to the mix as another ‘hitch ‘ in this whole election mess.
It’s time for Pink America. Forget Red States. Obama’s election is illegal. We need another Tea Party. Dump these voting computers in the Harbor. Look at all those people power revolutions in Kiyeph and Sayam, Orange and Rose. We are pink. We must take to the streets and prevent this illegal alien from enforcing Shariyah laws in our country and arming all those terrorists and socialists. The Demonrats fixed this election when they lost the Florida recount, when they passed HAVA. They messed the economy when they took the House. George Beller.
If Obama wins…plan two!
I have a great plan for True Americans!I am starting a company that will:
1.) Help true Americans give up their U.S. Citizenship
2.) Cross the border into Mexico and become a Mexican Citizen.
3.) Illegally cross the border into the United States
4.) Have anchor babies.
5.) Receive free housing
6.) Claim discrimination if you don’t get the same rights of true Americans
7.) Receive free schooling, healthcare, and the ability to earn a decent income WITHOUT having to pay taxes on it!
And best of all. We can then take to the streets proclaiming, share the wealth, share the wealth!
For all that would like to get started, please contact us at http://www.editorialdigest.com/
Don’t delay, your free meal ticket depends on it!
http://ifobamawins.blogspot.com/
Americans. Keep working.
Millions of illegals depend on you!
I feel like a hamster on one of those spinning things… It’s hard to keep track of everything and I appreciate those dedicated to getting the truth out. The following entry on another stop obama website indicates that BO was required to take name off of ballots. It mustn’t be true or it would be all over the internet and, I believe, even break through to the MSM… Could someone clarify? Is this just someone’s idea of a cruel joke and/or wishful thinking? Here’s the link followed by a partial quote:
“This Court Declares Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen and is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
The Democratic National Committee is hereby enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot and both the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
It is an ORDER of this Court that Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.
http://dissfunktional.wordpress.com/2008/10/26/barack-obama/
JohnT.
Great idea! Buena idea (en espanol)!
Are you the JohnT I know?
Worth Reading Over and Over Again…
It’s like there are only a handful of people running the entire world…
http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/#comment-1041
The recent Supreme Court Decision which ruled that “federal law that is silent on the question of whether it creates a private cause of action,… carries no “implied” right of action. “; will require that the litigant suing to force adherence to a federal law proves “right of action”.
An analysis of the Ninth Amendment to the constitution as to whether it infers the right of action to citizens, is needed. The entire definition of the Consitution as a document defining rights of citizen, would infer to it “right of action”
OK so what? Well the Supreme Court just threw out “The Underlying Dispute: Did Ohio’s Secretary of State Violate the Post-Bush v. Gore Federal Voting Statute? ” brought by RNC to it, because there was not a specific “Right of action in the law”.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20081021.html
I filed the following with an incorrect email address: please note.
The recent Supreme Court Decision which ruled that “federal law that is silent on the question of whether it creates a private cause of action,… carries no “implied” right of action. “; will require that the litigant suing to force adherence to a federal law proves “right of action”.
An analysis of the Ninth Amendment to the constitution as to whether it infers the right of action to citizens, is needed. The entire definition of the Consitution as a document defining rights of citizen, would infer to it “right of action”
OK so what? Well the Supreme Court just threw out “The Underlying Dispute: Did Ohio’s Secretary of State Violate the Post-Bush v. Gore Federal Voting Statute? ” brought by RNC to it, because there was not a specific “Right of action in the law”.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20081021.html
Why don’t we take it to the streets! Why don’t we protest the judges verdic at our capitals?
Admission of guilt by defaul!!! Mean nothing to Judge Barclay Surrick? What is he afraid of? Had he been bought off or simply theatened?
Obama has the moral fibre of a used car salesman..says anything to “close the deal”. If his citizenship is in order than “just produce the documentaion”!!! He can’t because he is a liar and a fraud. And what makes it worse is the mainstream media is protecting & promoting this con man. Hopefully the investigating will continue until he is unveiled to the public for what he truly is.
Pingback: Obama ineligible, Obama born in Kenya, Obama Indonesian, US Constitution, States, Secretary of State, Board of Elections, Electors, States must uphold US Constitution, 2008 Election « Citizen Wells
Stop the Obama Constitution!!!
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/
state dept. of Florida says the following
the Secretary’s authority is purely a ministerial one and he has no duty or authority to inquire beyond the papers submitted by the major political parties concerning the names that they submit as their nominees for presidential candidates.
One quote from the Florida Supreme Court from a 1973 case: “Once the candidate states his compliance, under oath, the Secretary’s ministerial determination of Eligibility for the office is at an end. Any challenge to the correctness of the candidate’s statement of compliance is for appropriate judicial determination ….”
the question is, has his compliance under oath
Pingback: The Electoral College - The Penultimate Firewall to Electoral Fraud « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations
Hey citizenwells,
No, not the citizenwells you know. But I like your site!
I post on subjectseek.com, but I will be visiting this site now that I found it!
Obama was born in Honolulu. McCain was born in Panama.
Pingback: Taking Action To Stop A Possible Fraud « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations
The American’s Creed
by William Tyler Page
I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.
I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.
–Written 1917, accepted by the United States House of Representatives on April 3, 1918.
I did not vote for Obama, however, all I ask as a citizen of the United States of America is that the constitution be upheld. How was anyone allowed to run for this office and verification of natural U.S. birth not confirmed prior to going on the ballot?
We do not allow a person to cross the border without proof of citizenship or documentation of permission. How can this be a problem? Show us that you, Obama, are not above the law and provide the proof.
ALL I ASK OF THIS PRESIDENT ELECT IS TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION NOW AND THROUGHOUT HIS TERM. WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH SO LET’S BEGIN IN A PROPER FASHION…PROVIDE CITIZENSHIP!
Pingback: Why Should Someone Taking A Job With The Government Promise To Uphold The Constitution Of The US - Askwers