Rapegate about Bill Clinton serial rapes and coverup with Hillary’s assistance, Clintons war on women, rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed, power

Rapegate about Bill Clinton serial rapes and coverup with Hillary’s assistance, Clintons war on women, rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed, power

“As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.”…David Schippers report to House Judiciary Committee

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion


Do a search on rapegate.

I did and found very little on the first 2 pages.

NewsMax, in the late nineties, thought it was an important story and had quite a few articles with rapegate in the title. Here are some of them:

February 3, 1999.

“Media Wags Circle the Wagons on Rapegate”

February 4, 1999.

“Rapegate Victim Slammed”

February 10, 1999

“‘NBC Anchor on Rapegate: ‘I’ve Recused Myself’”

February 19, 1999.

“Key Rapegate Facts First Reported by NewsMax.com”

August 3, 2000.

“Shays Reveals Details of Clinton’s ‘Horrific’ Broaddrick Rape”

January 13, 2001.

“L.A. Times Issues Rapegate Apology After NewsMax Report”

Those articles were scrubbed.

They can be found at Citizen News.


There are many more articles about Bill Clinton’s rapes on NewsMax as well and quite a few can be found at Citizen News.

The House Judiciary Committee Evidentiary Record from December 1998 mentions the following:


But no mention of Rapegate.

So what is Rapegate and why has it fundamentally disappeared from the internet and the public’s consciousness?


From Breitbart September 2, 2015.

“New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone has a new book, The Clintons’ War on Women, and he spoke exclusively to Breitbart News about the revelations he is making about Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Stone compared his book to Peter Schweizer’s Clinton Cash, which “was about the financial crimes of the Clintons, [and] this book is about the non-financial crimes of the Clintons.” Stone is one of the best-known — and best-dressed — political insiders in New York.

“It’s a horrifying true story of rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed and power.”

Stone coauthored the book with Robert Morrow, a political researcher and historian. Based on their research, the two show how Bill and Hillary left a trail of assault accusations, intimidation, and cover-ups against women and children.

The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.

Hillary Clinton’s core agenda is a quest for power, even while she presents herself as champion of women’s issues, Stone says.

“If Hillary intends to build her campaign around an appeal to women, her campaign is built on quicksand,” said Stone. But “Hillary is a life-time abuser of women and her advocacy on women issues rings hollow,” he said.

The book includes details about Clinton’s alleged crimes in Arkansas, in the White House, during her term as Secretary of State, and at the Clinton Foundation, and concludes with revelations about Hillary’s current presidential campaign.

“She’s a life-long abuser of women. She denigrates, degrades and threatens those women who are unlucky enough to be the sexual assault victims of her husband, and that number, you know, is in the hundreds,” Stone said exclusively to Breitbart News.

He explained the book focuses on 14 individual cases in which Hillary hired private detectives who “threatened and silenced” Bill’s victims.

Stone also said she is not the champion for children she portrays herself to be either. “We present the evidence that it was Hillary Clinton …who gave the order at Waco that killed 26 innocent children,” Stone told Breitbart News, which he argues in his book. “Janet Reno was only Attorney General for two weeks at the time that the U.S. government assaulted the … compound in Waco,” he said.

“We produce congressional evidence from both the Senate and the House that it was Hillary who gave the order to proceed,” he declared. “Twenty-six innocent children died in that assault, which was completely unnecessary.”

“Hillary’s hypocrisy is stunning ” Stone stated. “The key to defeating Hillary is to prove who she really is to women voters.”

According to the breathless press release, Stone and Morrow make the following arguments throughout the book:

  • Bill’s  series of sexual assaults on Eileen Wellstone, Juanita Broaddrick , Carolyn Moffet, Liz Ward Gracen, Becky Brown , Helen Dowdy, Paula Jones, Kathy Fergusen, Christy Zercher and Kathleen Willey among dozens of others.
  • The details of Bill’s rape of 19-year-old Emily Wellstone, for which he was thrown out of Oxford.”

Read more:


Lest you believe the book is conjecture:

The catalyst, not the reason, for Bill Clinton being impeached was his sexual escapades in the White House with Monica Lewinsky. The Clinton’s lying, perjury, obstruction of justice and other actions led to impeachment and subsequently knowledge that Bill Clinton was a serial rapist.

“David P. Schippers is key to the downfall of Hillary Clinton”…Citizen Wells

Who is David Schippers?

“The more I drill down into the role of David Schippers, former Chief Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the Bill Clinton Impeachment investigation, the more I am convinced that his findings and statements about the Clintons will be the downfall of Hillary in her attempt to take the White House.

David P. Schippers is a good man, a lifelong Democrat who voted for Bill Clinton twice. No right wing conspirator, who criticizes members of both parties.

From the Washington Post April 1, 1998.

“When David P. Schippers took his 10 children to the nation’s capital in 1976, he made sure they made it to the Jefferson Memorial. The founding father remains a hero of his, because he entered the political arena out of a sense of duty.

“He’s a man who never wanted to be in politics,” Schippers said yesterday. “He felt he owed it to the country to get involved in politics.”

At 68, Schippers is entering the nation’s political fray for the first time as the House Judiciary Committee’s chief investigator. The post itself is controversial: Democrats suspect that Schippers’s hire, which Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.) announced late last week, marks the opening salvo in an impeachment crusade. Republicans say the Chicago lawyer will oversee the review of the Justice Department in connection with the agency’s first authorization in nearly two decades, but acknowledge privately that Schippers could also analyze any documents forwarded by independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr.

Like Jefferson, Schippers insists he is coming to the Hill reluctantly.

“I don’t seek this, I didn’t seek this, and it’s something that has to be done,” he said in his first interview since he was appointed.”

“The Cook County Democrat, who once ran, unsuccessfully, for Illinois Supreme Court, might seem like an unusual pick for Hyde, a Republican. They became friends when the two of them served on a panel investigating judicial corruption in Illinois. Schippers has no Hill or constitutional-law expertise, and established his reputation in the mid-1960s as chief of the Justice Department’s task force examining organized crime in Chicago.”


From the David Schippers Report to the House Judiciary Committee.

“On October 5, 1998, I came before this Committee to advise you of the results of our analysis and review of the Referral from the Office of the Independent Counsel. We concluded that there existed substantial and credible evidence of several separate events directly involving the President that COULD constitute grounds for impeachment. At that time I specifically limited my review and report to evidence of possible felonies. In addition, I asserted that the Report and analysis was merely a litany of crimes that MIGHT HAVE been committed.

On October 7, the House of Representatives passed Resolution 581 calling for an inquiry to determine whether the House should exercise its constitutional duty to impeach President William Jefferson Clinton.

Thereafter, this Committee heard testimony from several experts and other witnesses, including the Independent Counsel, Kenneth Starr.

Since that time, my staff and I, as requested, have conducted ongoing investigations and inquiries. We have received and reviewed additional information and evidence from the Independent Counsel, and have developed additional information from diverse sources.

Unfortunately, because of the extremely strict time limits placed upon us, a number of very promising leads had to be abandoned. We just ran out of time. In addition, many other allegations of possible serious wrongdoing cannot be presented publicly at this time by virtue of circumstances totally beyond our control.

For example, we uncovered more incidents involving probable direct and deliberate obstruction of justice, witness tampering, perjury and abuse of power. We were, however, informed both by the Department of Justice and by the Office of the Independent Counsel that to bring forth publicly that evidence at this time would seriously compromise pending criminal investigations that are nearing completion. We have bowed to their suggestion.”

“When I appeared in this Committee Room a little over two months ago, it was merely to analyze the Referral and report. Today, after our investigation, I have come to a point that I prayed I would never reach. It is my sorrowful duty now to accuse President William Jefferson Clinton of obstruction of justice, false and deliberately misleading statements under oath, witness tampering, abuse of power, and false statements to and obstruction of the Congress of the United States in the course of this very impeachment inquiry. Whether these charges are high crimes and misdemeanors and whether the President should be impeached is not for me to say or even to give an opinion. That is your job. I am merely going to set forth the evidence and testimony before you so that you can judge.

As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.

Before we get into the President’s lies and obstruction, it is important to place the events in the proper context. We have acknowledged all along that if this were only about sex, you would not now be engaged in this debate. But the manner in which the Lewinsky relationship arose and continued is important. It is illustrative of the character of the President and the decisions he made.”

David Schippers Report House Judiciary Committee, Majority chief investigative counsel for impeachment, Probable direct and deliberate obstruction of justice witness tampering perjury and abuse of power leads abandoned due to strict time limits

From NewsMax August 22, 2000 via Citizen News

“Bill Clinton tacitly admitted that he raped Juanita Broaddrick during a conversation with her husband in the mid-1980s, according to an account given to House impeachment investigators by Broaddrick herself, a new book claims.

David Schippers, the former Chicago mob-busting attorney selected by House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde to head the Clinton impeachment inquiry two years ago, offers the Clinton rape shocker in “Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment.”

Schippers was initially recruited by Hyde before the Lewinsky case broke, to conduct the first serious oversight investigation of the Justice Department in twenty years.

In that capacity, he uncovered other aspects of Clinton administration corruption that went far beyond the lies and obstruction in the Monica Lewinsky and Paula Jones cases. But when Starr sent over an impeachment report that focused exclusively on Sexgate, the constraints of time and the timidity of the GOP leadership left Schippers little choice but to make that the focus of the House impeachment probe.

The longtime Democrat who twice voted for Clinton hired two trusted investigators he knew from his days working with Chicago law enforcement. Seeking to build a case against Clinton that went beyond his lies and obstruction in the Lewinsky case, Schippers sent Diana Woznicki and John Kocoras to Arkansas in search of other Jane Does who had been pressured to deny a sexual relationship with Clinton.

“Within a day or two,” Schippers writes, “Diana reported to me about a woman in Arkansas, Juanita Broaddrick, who alleged that Clinton had raped her years earlier.”

Schippers’ first instinct was to ignore the unconfirmed rumors. It was to him “a shocking story, but nothing in itself that would affect our case in the Senate.”

Then Woznicki dropped a bombshell on her boss.

“Oh, one more thing that I picked up. She was subpoenaed by Jones lawyers. She filed an affidavit denying everything.”

Schippers’ reaction? “Bingo! That changed the whole picture.” If Broaddrick had been pressured to lie, it would be part of a pattern of obstruction of justice that the Senate couldn’t possibly ignore.

Once Schippers discovered that Starr had investigated Broaddrick’s charges, he requested any and all information the Office of Independent Counsel had on the case. House probers learned that Broaddrick’s charges were corroborated by several witness interviewed by the OIC.

At that point, Kocoras and Woznicki were dispatched again to Arkansas. During a meeting with Broaddrick and her lawyer, the Clinton rape accuser was reluctant to acknowledge the assault. But in a telephone conversation later that day, Broaddrick unburdened herself of the secret she had carried for 20 years.

For an hour and a half, the Arkansas businesswoman described the the terrifying experience to Woznicki, who had worked with rape victims during her days on the Chicago police force. When the two investigators returned to Washington, Woznicki told Schippers, “Juanita fits the pattern of the classic rape victim.””

Schippers Book Bombshell: Clinton acknowledged Broaddrick rape, Schippers pre-impeachment probe of Justice Dept uncovered Clinton INS plan to naturalize tens of thousands of immigrants, 75k made citizens under Clinton plan had arrest records, Newsmax August 22, 2000

From NewsMax February 19, 1999 via Citizen News.

“Did NBC News Save Clinton?”

“What might have happened had NBC News broadcast its Jan. 20 interview with alleged Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick during President Clinton’s impeachment trial?”

“It was the perception of Clinton’s invincible popularity that saved him at the end of the day, with normally reasonable senators like Robert Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, admitting that he was impeachably guilty of high crimes but not removable because of his public support.

Enter Juanita Broaddrick, who told her story to NBC’s Lisa Myers at the height of Clinton’s impeachment trial — only to see the network put her interview on ice for the duration.

NBC executives surely worried about the impact of Broaddrick’s rape allegation against Clinton as they ran out the clock. The Rapegate shocker threatened Clinton’s popularity as no other revelation had since the opening days of the Lewinsky scandal.

Here, the White House was faced with an allegation of violent sexual assault that eyewitnesses say left its victim hysterical, bruised, and bleeding. “It’s just about sex,” had worked for 12 months. How would “It’s just about rape” play in Peoria?

Certainly NBC remembered that when Clinton’s early Monicagate poll numbers went over the cliff, it really was just about sex. There was no semen-stained dress to prove Clinton’s perjury in the Paula Jones case. White House secretary Betty Currie had yet to tell Ken Starr’s grand jury about Clinton coaching her with lies “to refresh his memory.” And Monica herself wouldn’t turn state’s evidence for another six months.

It was just about sex between a 21-year-old girl and a 50-year-old president — in the same room where Lincoln had planned his Civil War strategy with Grant; where Roosevelt and Churchill decided the fate of the world 80 years later. And for a short few weeks, the public was repulsed and disgusted.

Nearly a year to the day after Clinton’s political lifesaving State of the Union address, NBC tentatively scheduled Juanita Broaddrick’s interview for broadcast. But three days earlier, Broaddrick had been warned there was trouble back at the ranch.

“The good news is, you’re credible,” Lisa Myers told her. “The bad news is, you’re very, very credible.” Network brass was panicking after interviewing five corroborating witnesses and putting Broaddrick through a background check from which she emerged, she was told, “squeaky clean.”

And there were other concerns. Though they’ve generally kept this news from the rest of the country, journalists know that the House vote to impeach Clinton was swayed by secret material stored in a locked and guarded evidence room in D.C.’s Gerald Ford Building.

This was the information House Majority Whip Tom DeLay referenced when he suggested that senators “pay a visit to the evidence room and you might just see 67 votes [to convict] appear out of thin air.” Congressman who have reviewed the information describe it as “horrific” and “nauseating.” One was reduced to tears.

But the Senate, hell-bent for acquittal, declined DeLay’s invitation.”

Did NBC News Save Clinton?, Delay of broadcast of interview with alleged Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick, Rapegate shocker threatened Clinton’s popularity, Lisa Myers To Broaddrick: The bad news is you’re very very credible, Newsmax February 19, 1999


There is much much more and more to come here:



12 responses to “Rapegate about Bill Clinton serial rapes and coverup with Hillary’s assistance, Clintons war on women, rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed, power

  1. “The good news is, you’re credible,”
    “The bad news is, you’re very, very credible.”…Lisa Myers of NBC to Juanita Broaddrick

  2. “Remember experts came up before you and pointed to the fact that the House refused to impeach President Nixon for lying on an income tax return. Can you imagine a future President, faced with possible impeachment, pointing to the perjuries, lies, obstructions, tamperings, and abuses of power by the current occupant of the office as not rising to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors? If this isn’t enough, what is? How far can the standard be lowered without completely compromising the credibility of the office for all time?”…David Schippers

  3. “Arkansas nursing home operator Juanita Broaddrick told impeachment investigators she was raped not once but twice by Bill Clinton during a brutal attack in a Little Rock hotel room 22 years ago, Connecticut Congressman Christopher Shays revealed Wednesday.

    Shays was one of 40 moderate congressional Republicans to visit the Ford Building evidence room during the House impeachment probe, where Broaddrick’s accusation and documentation of other alleged Clinton crimes were made available for review.

    Five days after Clinton was impeached by the House, Shays told the New York Times that the evidence was “very alarming and very unsettling,” involving “conduct by the president that is alleged to be pretty horrific.”

    In his comments to the Times Shays made no mention of the second attack on Broaddrick.

    But when asked about the Ford Building evidence on Wednesday by WELI New Haven talk-radio host Tom Scott, Shays replied, “I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event.”

    When Scott asked Shays if he believes the president is a rapist, the congressman replied, “I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick.””


  4. CW……..
    ………..at one point during the time Slick Willy was the governor of Arkansas that many young women were forcibly brought to the back door of the governor’s mansion, by his pals in the State Police, and there they faced an ultimatum from the BASTARD himself………..either INDULGE ME or go to jail. I pray that I will live long enough to see him die a horrible, and extremely painful death. I believe that God will act where Slick Willy is concerned. He is not only a serial rapist, but a serial murderer as well.

  5. ANYONE………
    ………..who perpetrates rape is also capable of MURDER as well.

  6. AND……….
    ………….Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Clinton says ” I am SOOOOOOOO SUPERRRRRIOR to everyone that I SHOULD BE SIMPLY APPOINTED TO THE PRESIDENCY without any sort of election by the people”.
    In reality she is an insane POS and sadly the God fearing people of Arkansas are often unfairly judged because of the Clintons behavior.

  7. ………..AGAIN……..
    ……….I pray that I live long enough to watch God punish both of the Clintons for their lifetime of criminal practice.

  8. oldsailor84 | September 4, 2016 at 1:54 pm |

    ……….I pray that I live long enough to watch God punish both of the Clintons for their lifetime of criminal practice.

    Clintons may be on the run after Trump is elected, and people start demanding their donations back. There may be several upset investors.

  9. Laura Ingraham

    Hillary was more than ‘extremely careless.’

    10 Big Revelations from the Clinton FBI Report

    Hillary Clinton had better brace herself for the ongoing maelstrom that will result from the FBI’s release late Friday of its report detailing its investigation into her use of a private email server…


    Let the title of this post soak in my friends….take every word in and think about it for a moment. We have INTENTIONALLY been spoon – fed nothing but lies and more lies about exactly what happened in Benghazi when Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were left to die because they were to receive no help from the government who sent them there in the first place….
    The burning question and the bottom line is “Why didn’t our government send help to rescue that mission from the terrorist” ? When the truth is finally told, then within this question lies the answer we are looking for.
    That answer is found in two parts;
    First; Obama was facing reelection in November, which was only 2 months away. He and Hillary Clinton was determined not to have any incident that would paint Obama as being weak on foreign policy and the terrorist, if his weakness showed, it would also damage Clinton’s bid for the Oval office in 2016……so they became “partners in crime”.
    Second; Obama had been looking for a way to fake a reason to release the “blind Sheikh’,Omar Abdel Rahman, who had been in prison since 1993 for the first bombing of the World Trade Center in which many Americans lost their lives, but the towers still stood. It is also interesting to note here that it was under George Bush’s presidency that the Sheikh was imprisoned for his criminal activity.
    “Someone’ (perhaps Mohamed Morsi of Egypt) apparently told or advised Obama that if he permitted Ambassador Stevens to be kidnapped in Benghazi that he could trade the blind Sheikh for Ambassador Stevens. The blind Sheikh could then go back home to Egypt with Morsi, who would then be looked upon there as a hero, and Stevens could go back home to the USA where perhaps praise would be given to Obama for gaining the release of his Ambassador.This arrangement would have been a win-win situation for both criminal governments……..Obama felt that would be an acceptable trade and that the American people would accept the arrangement.
    But there was a problem, only months before a top terrorist from Libya was killed by an American drone strike in another country. This top terrorist claimed Libya as his home…..so when the attack occurred, I feel that someone did not fully inform the terrorist of exactly what the plot was and what their mission was to only kidnap, not kill Stevens. Instead of kidnapping Stevens though, they murdered him and after doing so, committed unspeakable acts of horror against his dead body.
    This murder of four Americans has now caused the entire ‘Arab Spring’ scenario that Obama and Hillary Clinton had master-mined to establish a Muslim Brotherhood Caliphate in the middle east to start coming unraveled. Following the Benghazi attack, Morsi was arrested by the Egyptian military who reclaimed their countryfrom the Muslim Brotherhood. Mohamed Morsi was then put on trial for his life in Egypt as a terrorist, and Obama and Clinton are now trying to some distance between him and them. Neither will speak openly of their relationship with Morsi and what their plan was for the middle east……but we all know !
    Morsi’s son has vowed if his father is put to death in Egypt for crimes that Obama and Clinton has a big hand in creating for his father, that he will .. ” spill the beans on both Obama and Clinton ” ……that very well may happen soon. .
    Libya now is in total shambles with no one in real control of that country, thanks to the policies of Obama and Clinton. The arms and munitions that were taken from Mormar Khadafi when he was murdered have now been shuttled through Turkey and into the hands of ISIS, along with cash and funding to aid their growth in that region.
    America’s foreign policy under Obama and Clinton has been a “worldwide joke”…..they have not solved a single problem during their time in office…but they surely have caused great damage to all foreign policies across the globe.
    Our own government has been proven responsible for the formation of the most terrible of all the Islamic terrorist networks in the world;…… ISIS.
    The videos you are about to watch will prove this beyond doubt.
    Diplomacy in the middle east has, and always will be, a very delicate thing. Our government has lied openly to us, the citizens, and to the entire world, about the Benghazi attack. They told us it was caused by a silly home made video critical of Mohammed……Obama spoke of this video before all the nations of the world at the UN, Susan Rice spoke five times on Sunday talk shows to the people of America, Hillary Clinton spoke of the video many times when addressing the families of the dead…….Obama’s press secretary then spoke of it almost daily for a month placing blame directly on the video ……the media then bought into that can of worms like they were expected to.
    Gobbles, Hitler propaganda expert once said, “Tell a lie, tell it big enough, and keep telling it…..the public will eventually believe you”.
    It appears our government has taken that play right out of the Nazi handbook and used it against E Plurbus Urum ( that’s We The People).
    But it wasn’t the silly video, and some people knew that…it was just an ‘old-fashion’ kidnapping that had gone astray.
    Almost immediately after the attack, Obama promised to bring the terrorist responsible for this attack to swift justice. That was in September of 2012… to date, only one low level terrorist has been deported to America and he will not go to trial until 2017….long after who are really guilty of neglect and high crimes has fled the scene….
    There is a 6 part series on youtube entitled; ….” FINALLY; The Truth About Benghazi “….this is an excellent account of what really happened at Benghazi, who was responsible, why the attack occurred, and the guilty parties who should be held accountable for allowing four American’s to die just to feather some people ‘political nest’ ….This is the story that has never been told in the main stream media…and perhaps, never will be.
    I will post part one of this most interesting series here. For those who still seek the real truth about Benghazi, I encourage you to watch every part of this video. It will take about one and one-half hours to view them all…..but I can assure you it will be time well spent…..
    America and her citizens deserve the TRUTH. Those responsible for this disaster deserve their PUNISHMENT.
    God Bless, and keep looking and searching for the TRUTH, it’s out there ….. you just have to find it.

  11. Mother Teresa speaks………..

    In 1994 Mother Teresa delivered a no-hold-barred pro-life speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in front of Clinton, her equally pro-abortion husband, then-President Bill Clinton, and Al and Tipper Gore.

    But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself.

    And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even His life to love us. So, the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love, that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts.

    By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems.

    And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. That father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.

    Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion.

    Mr. and Mrs. Clinton did not stand and did not applaud.

  12. oldsoldier80 | September 4, 2016 at 6:26 pm |

    Thanks for the video, I’ve already shared it on Facebook, especially to the Hilliary victim voters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s