Category Archives: Justice

Justice

Cort Wrotnowski lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Update, December 2, 2008, Emergency Application hand delivered, Wrotnowski versus Connecticut Secretary of State, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski avoids anthrax screening, Delivered to Associate Justice Antonin Scalia

Here is the latest on the Cort Wrotnowski lawsuit, Wrotnowski versus Connecticut Secretary of State,
that is before the US Supreme Court.

“Cort Wrotnowski, (SCOTUS Docket No. 08A469), a day after facing the shock of his life when told by a SCOTUS clerk that his renewed application to Justice Scalia would be held back for 7 days due to anthrax screening, hand delivered 10 copies of his renewed application to the Security booth at SCOTUS this morning at 10:30 AM.  Cort was told by the Clerk’s office that the papers would “probably” be in the Clerk’s office by 2:00 PM.   Cort’s application, according to Supreme Court Rule 22.1, should be “transmitted promptly” to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.  Keep your eyes on that Docket to see if they will follow the Rules of Court.

In my case, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, the docket has been updated to include the letter I sent to all nine Justices which included copies of official Judicial Misconduct allegations against the New Jersey Judge who handled my initial NJ Appellate Division case.  This is important because the letter made clear that should the SCOTUS request an official copy of the case file from the lower court, the file on record there is fraudulent.

It’s significant to note that I sent this letter directly to the nine Justices.  While I did send a copy to the Clerk of the Court, the copies I sent to Justices went directly to them without asking the Clerk to distribute them.  Since this was not an official pleading, I wasn’t required to go through the Clerk’s office.  The letter was sent on November 22, 2008 but has only just hit the Docket today, December 2, 2008.  I didn’t think this letter would become part of the Docket.  I expect members of the press might be able to find out what this means. Nobody in the Clerk’s office will take my calls.”

Read more here:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Leo Donofrio lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Donofrio v. Wells, Update, December 2, 2008, Justice Clarence Thomas, all 9 Supreme Court Justices, Conference, Friday, December 5, Rule of Four

Here is an update on the Leo Donofrio lawsuit, Donofrio v. Wells, that is before the US Supreme Court:
“Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, has been able to confirm that his case was referred to the full Court by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. This means that, per the docket, all 9 Justices have agreed to hold a Conference this Friday, December 5 to consider granting Certiorari. If this is granted, then the “Rule of Four” concept will then be in play.

If 4 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative to Leo’s case, there will be an oral argument and further briefing. If 5 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative, they could grant a stay of the Electoral College vote.

Leo also updated everyone on Cort Wrotnowski’s case (where Cort is Plaintiff), Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz. Apparently, after Cort called the Supreme Court requesting an update of his emergency stay renewal, he spoke with a certain individual who allegedly stated that his particular case (docket) had been referred to an anthrax containment facility! This news has led Leo Donofrio to call all concerned citizens to write the Supreme Court in diplomatic fashion to address this outrageous behavior.

There is also a rumor that the full Court may be seriously considering staying the Electoral College vote until after Barack Obama’s eligibility can be confirmed (the following excerpt from Bob Vernon of Honest American News (Plains Radio Network)):”

Read more here:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317

Jeff Katz fired, WBT talk radio fires Katz, Tara Servatius replaces, December 1, 2008, Citizen Wells seeks truth about dismissal

Jeff Katz, who had a talk radio show in the afternoon after Rush Limbaugh on WBT radio in Charlotte NC, was fired on Monday, December 1, 2008. Jeff Katz was considered controversial by some, but he was one of the few locally telling the truth about Barack Obama, and trying to inform the citizens of the Charlotte area. I listened to Jeff Katz when I was able. He was a beacon of truth in a morass of lies and bias such as that emanating from the extremely biased Charlotte Observer. Many of the callers to Jeff’s show would be obnoxious or blind followers of Obama. Katz handled them as best as could be reasonably expected. Of course no one in this day and age wants the truth and no one should question the “messiah”, Obama.

Citizen Wells intends to get to the bottom of this and find out the truth about the Jeff Katz dismissal.

Stay tuned.

Jeff Katz, God bless you for the job you did. The listeners of WBT talk radio owe you a debt of gratitude.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Update December 2, 2008, Emergency Injunction, Writ of Certiorari deadline, Obama and DNC have not responded

Jeff Schreiber has provided an update from Philip J Berg on his US Supreme Court Writ of Certiori.

“One day after the deadline set by Supreme Court Justice David Souter for Barack Obama and the DNC to respond to attorney Philip Berg’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari has passed without an answer, Berg is filing a motion in the Court in an attempt to further prevent Obama from taking office in January as the 44th president of the United States.

From what I could gather, the emergency motion for immediate injunction contains two main parts — in filing the motion, Berg is looking for the Court (1) to prohibit the certification of electors by the governors of each individual state in order to stay the Electoral College from casting votes for Obama on December 15, and (2) to stay the official counting of any votes for Obama by Vice President Dick Cheney, the House of Representatives and United States Senate on January 6, 2009, pending any decision on his appeal.

“As I’ve said over and over and over again, we’re headed toward a constitutional crisis, and it is absolutely imperative that we find out now, before he is sworn in, whether Obama is qualified under the United States Constitution to be president,” Berg said.

“It is my firm belief, my one thousand percent firm belief,” he said, “that he does not meet the natural born qualifications, that he should not be voted for by the electors, and that he should not be sworn in this January unless he shows his credentials … which he of course cannot, simply because he does not have them.”

The motion comes one day after Obama and the DNC were directed to respond to Berg’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari (the parties, however, are allowed two more days for mail service). On Wed., Nov. 19, the Federal Election Commission formally waived its right to respond to Berg’s petition and, while such waiver is not necessary, neither is any such response to a petition. Like the FEC, Obama and the DNC could essentially bank on the low odds that any one matter will be heard by the Court (only somewhere between 70 and 120 of the approximately 8,000 petitions are granted each year), or rely on arguments already made that Berg lacks standing to sue at all.”

Read more here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Leo Donofrio lawsuit, US Supreme Court, December 5, 2008, SCOTUS, Donofrio and Wrotnowski interview, Cort Wrotnowski delayed 7 days, Anthrax facility, Update December 1, 2008, ** Breaking News **

Leo Donofrio has just announced that the Cort Wrotnowski case in the US Supreme Court has been delayed
7 days due to his renewed application being sent to an Anthrax Facility. Donofrio is outraged at this
delay tactic and behind the scenes chicanery at the Supreme Court.

Leo Donofrio’s website:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

We the People Foundation, Chicago Tribune, Monday, December 1, 2008, Letter to Obama, formal Petition for a Redress, original birth certificate, forensic scientists, December 8, 2008, Washington, D.C. press conference

We the People Foundation has published a letter in the Chicago Tribune today, Monday, December 1, 2008
and will publish another on December 8, 2008. Here is an exerpt from the We the People Foundation site:
“Our full-page Open Letter to Mr. Obama will be published in the Chicago Tribune
on both Monday, December 1, 2008 and Wednesday, December 3, 2008. It will appear in the main news section. Click here to view a copy of the final ad.

Chicago is Mr. Obama’s hometown. His transition team is operating out of the Kluczynski Federal Building in downtown Chicago. He is known to be a regular reader of the Tribune, Chicago’s principal newspaper, with a daily circulation of over a half-million readers. 

The Open Letter to Mr. Obama is a formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States of America. Mr. Obama is respectfully requested to direct the Hawaiian officials to provide access to his original birth certificate on December 5-7 by our team of forensic scientists, and to provide additional documentary evidence establishing his citizenship status prior to our Washington, D.C. press conference on December 8.”

Here is the text of the Letter:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“An Open Letter

to Barack Obama:

Are you a Natural Born

Citizen of the U.S.?

Are you legally eligible to

hold the Office of President?

We The People Foundation

For Constitutional Education, Inc.

http://www.WeThePeopleFoundation.org

2458 Ridge Road Queensbury, NY 12804

info@GiveMeLiberty.org

December 1, 2008

Mr. Barack Obama

Barack Obama Transition Office

Kluczynski Federal Building

230 So. Dearborn St.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Dear Mr. Obama:

Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also

taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America,

I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the

Constitution.

Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding

the Office of President by the ?natural born citizen? clause of the U.S.

Constitution. For instance:

 

 

You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughlydiscredited,

 

 

computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a formthat lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed

Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of

attending physician and age of mother.

 

 

Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were bornin Hawaii.

 

 

Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya.

 

 

Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birthin Kenya.

 

 

U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child bornin Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19

years of age.

 

 

In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S.citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming

a naturalized Indonesian citizen.

You have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when

challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have

been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order

you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.

Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of

your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in

order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.

Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President

you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution.

You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence.

Should you assume the office as anyone but a

 

 

bona fide natural borncitizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you

would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic

peace and stability of the Nation. For example:

 

 

You would always be viewed by many Americans as aposeur – a

 

 

usurper .

 

 

As a usurper , you would be unable to take the required ?Oath orAffirmation? on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or

false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the

Office of the President of the United States.

 

 

You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support fromthe People.

 

 

The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remainobedient to you.

 

 

No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any ofyour proclamations, Executive Orders or directives, as such orders

would be legally void.

 

 

Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.

 

 

Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation becauseit would not be able to acquire the signature of a

 

 

bona fide President.

 

 

Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper , from the Officeof the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos

including a potential for armed conflicts within the General

Government or among the States and the People to effect the

removal of such a

 

 

usurper .In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the

total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility,

I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a

Redress of this violation of the Constitution.

With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate

Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth

certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday,

December 5, 6 and 7, 2008.

In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to

the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 am on December 8, 2008,

marked for my attention:

 

 

A certified copy of your original, signed ?vault? birth certificate.

 

 

Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in thenames Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack

Dunham and Barry Dunham.

 

 

A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.

 

 

A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.

 

 

Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College,Columbia University and Harvard Law School.

 

 

Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote

on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are

a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public

record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are

barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the

Constitution?s eligibility requirements.

All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary

evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility,

they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.

?

 

 

In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiledif it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent,

the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people

by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a

lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become

a law unto himself; it invites anarchy

 

 

.? Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.

Sincerely,

Robert L. Schulz

Chairman”

Read the formatted letter here:

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/ChicagoTribune-ObamaLtr-Nov-2008.pdf

 

 

 

 

Leo Donofrio lawsuit, Natural Born Citizen, Update December 1, 2008, Obama not natural born citizen, Donofrio new site on WordPress, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com, JUSTICE SCALIA, WROTNOWSKI V. CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE

Leo Donofrio has moved his website from Google’s blogger account to WordPress. Donofrio has provided an
update today, Monday, December 1, 2008 on his NJ lawsuit appeal and Cort Wrotnowski versus Connecticut
Secretary of State lawsuit, both before the US Supreme Court.

“Today we are watching for the SCOTUS AUTOMATED Docket to be updated with two important developments, one in Cort’s case and one in mine.

We hope the docket will reflect that Cort Wrotnowski has renewed his application to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of this morning.  Cort’s application for an emergency stay and/or injunction was denied by the Honorable Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on November 26, 2008.  Cort sent it by Express mail on Saturday Nov. 29, 2008.

We are also hoping to see my supplemental brief docketed and distributed to the Justices today.  This was sent via FED EX on Wed. Nov. 26 and was delivered on Friday Nov. 28 at 9:05 AM, but it still hasn’t been updated to the docket…see Fed ex tracking number 866846734555”
Read more here:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Leo Donofrio lawsuit, Natural Born Citizen, Judah Benjamin article, Texas Darlin blog, December 1, 2008, Obama not natural born citizen, thenaturalborncitizen.blogspot.com, Donofrio new site on WordPress, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

Leo Donofrio has moved his website from Google’s blogger account to WordPress. Donofrio has a new
article that explains natural born citizen in response to the Judah Benjamin article on the Texas Darlin
blog.

“On November 28, 2008, Judah Benjamin published an article at the Texas Darlin blog which discussed my case and the natural born citizen issue.  While I enjoyed reading this article, and I agree with the conclusion – that Obama is not eligible – I disagree with the basis upon which that conclusion was made.

Specifically, I disagree that the common law is controlling on the issue of “natural born citizen”.  It is “national law” which is controlling.  I don’t know if Mr. Benjamin is a lawyer, but his reading, explanation and understanding of the natural born citizen issue is not exactly on point.

I do agree with Benjamin’s conclusion, that Obama is not a natural born citizen, but for the wrong reasons.

And I did enjoy Judah’s article above.  He has obviously done much research.  But there is a glaring mistake in his logic where he fails to point out the necessary concept in common law definition of “natural born subject.”

There are two mistakes in his article which need to be addressed.

FIRST MISTAKE: Failure to state cited law was repealed.

Judah mentions the 1790 naturalization act as follows:

“In the United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) it says:

‘the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens’.”

Unfortunately, Benjamin fails to mention, as do many others, that this act was specifically repealed in 1795 and replaced with the same exact clause as written above EXCEPT the words “natural born” have been deleted leaving only the word “citizens”.

See Section 3 Naturalization Act of 1795

This leads to the second point of error.

SECOND MISTAKE:  Failure to properly analyze common law.”

Read more here:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Larry Sinclair book, Globe Magazine article, December 8, 2008, Edition, Fact versus Fiction, Lie detector test, Brain Tumor, Sinclair Obama drug encounter, November 1999, Obama inauguration ruined?

Globe Magazine has an article in the December 8, 2008 edition that provides details about Larry Sinclair and his new book “Obama & Larry Sinclair: Coke, Sex, Lies & Murder?”. I would like to first applaud Globe Magazine for publishing this article. It was just a few months ago that the Enquirer broke the story about John Edwards cheating on his wife. Both stories had been ignored or covered up by the Mainstream Media.

Too bad Globe was not accurate in their reporting. The so called tabloids were beginning to surpass the
MSM in legitimate reporting. Here are some examples of the continued lies and misrepresentations of Larry
Sinclair’s story:

Globe article:

“He also failed a disputed lie detector test over the sex and drug claims.”

Larry Sinclair: Fact vs Fiction

Larry Sinclair Press Conference

Globe article:

“Sinclair also says he’s been diagnosed with a brain tumor and has about a year to live.”

Larry Sinclair statement:

“Yes, I have been diagnosed with a Brain Tumor. NO, I am not on my death bed. In fact I never stated to the Globe or anyone else that I had less than a year to live. The funny thing about all these claims of my impending demise is that no one can make such a claim, not even me. The reason being is simple, when I was diagnosed I made the decision not to treat and to allow nature to take its course. I believe we all are going to die, and when it is our time there is nothing any of us or any Dr. can do. So my decision was mine and I have not allowed any Dr. to tell me what they believe is my expiration date.”

Read more from Larry Sinclair here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/

Globe Magazine, Barack Obama, New Book, Sex and drug secrets, Obama linked to murder, GLOBE world exclusive, wreck the inauguration, Larry Sinclair Book, November 27, 2008, Globe article is about Sinclair’s book, Barack Obama livid?

Globe Magazine has a front page story in their their latest issue that refers to a new book about
Barack Obama that “claims to reveal his sex and drug secrets – and link him to a murder”. It has been
confirmed that Globe is referring to the new book by Larry Sinclair that reveals Sinclair’s alleged drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999 and Obama’s knowledge of Donald Young’s murder?

Here is the front page summary from Globe:

“PRESIDENT-elect Barack Obama is furious over a shocking new book that claims to reveal his sex and drug secrets – and link him to a murder – political insiders say in a stunning GLOBE world exclusive. Find out who is blowing the whistle on America’s next commander-in-chief and why the author’s bombshells could wreck the inauguration. It’s must reading for every American!”

Larry Sinclair has provided some intersesting exerpts from the Globe Magazine article:

“Thursday, November 27, 2008
SO OBAMA WANTS IT TO GO AWAY? THEN OBAMA NEEDS TO TELL THE TRUTH

EXCERPTS FROM THE GLOBE ARTICLE

Obama remained cool headed during his historic run for the White House shrugging off every nasty attack. But sources close to Obama now say he is incensed by the book and labels it as a “vicious and hurtful attempt to taint” the incoming president.

“Barack Obama is absolutely livid about this book,” reveals a Beltway insider. “He says its all a bunch of crap and he wants it to go away.”

“This inauguration is not only important to the nation, it’s important to the entire world,” note the insider. “We don’t want to see Larry Sinclair’s outrageous words take away from that one bit.”

“…sources say Obama’s wife Michelle is equally upset by the
allegations…”

Now people close to the President-elect declare “it’s time for Sinclair to stop making his lurid allegations and forget about writing a book.” “Enough is enough,” blasts the insider. “Our country is in trouble right now and we don’t need this nonsense.” But Sinclair says he has no plans to scrap his book.”

Read more from Larry Sinclair here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/

Click here for more information on the Larry Sinclair book

If the story is not true, why doesn’t Obama sue Sinclair?