Globe Magazine, Barack Obama, New Book, Sex and drug secrets, Obama linked to murder, GLOBE world exclusive, wreck the inauguration, Larry Sinclair Book, November 27, 2008, Globe article is about Sinclair’s book, Barack Obama livid?

Globe Magazine has a front page story in their their latest issue that refers to a new book about
Barack Obama that “claims to reveal his sex and drug secrets – and link him to a murder”. It has been
confirmed that Globe is referring to the new book by Larry Sinclair that reveals Sinclair’s alleged drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999 and Obama’s knowledge of Donald Young’s murder?

Here is the front page summary from Globe:

“PRESIDENT-elect Barack Obama is furious over a shocking new book that claims to reveal his sex and drug secrets – and link him to a murder – political insiders say in a stunning GLOBE world exclusive. Find out who is blowing the whistle on America’s next commander-in-chief and why the author’s bombshells could wreck the inauguration. It’s must reading for every American!”

Larry Sinclair has provided some intersesting exerpts from the Globe Magazine article:

“Thursday, November 27, 2008


Obama remained cool headed during his historic run for the White House shrugging off every nasty attack. But sources close to Obama now say he is incensed by the book and labels it as a “vicious and hurtful attempt to taint” the incoming president.

“Barack Obama is absolutely livid about this book,” reveals a Beltway insider. “He says its all a bunch of crap and he wants it to go away.”

“This inauguration is not only important to the nation, it’s important to the entire world,” note the insider. “We don’t want to see Larry Sinclair’s outrageous words take away from that one bit.”

“…sources say Obama’s wife Michelle is equally upset by the

Now people close to the President-elect declare “it’s time for Sinclair to stop making his lurid allegations and forget about writing a book.” “Enough is enough,” blasts the insider. “Our country is in trouble right now and we don’t need this nonsense.” But Sinclair says he has no plans to scrap his book.”

Read more from Larry Sinclair here:

Click here for more information on the Larry Sinclair book

If the story is not true, why doesn’t Obama sue Sinclair?

34 responses to “Globe Magazine, Barack Obama, New Book, Sex and drug secrets, Obama linked to murder, GLOBE world exclusive, wreck the inauguration, Larry Sinclair Book, November 27, 2008, Globe article is about Sinclair’s book, Barack Obama livid?

  1. zachjonesishome

    “…If the story is not true, why doesn’t Obama sue Sinclair?” AMEN

  2. Obama afraid of cans of worms opening up if he sues

  3. Best explanation (following 2 you tube videos) I’ve seen for the total media blackout of what is the single greatest news event and domestic threat — let’s call it OBAMAGATE — since the outbreak of the American Civil War and for the sincere prayers of the American people that the United States Supreme Court — let’s call it OUR LAST HOPE — now to have the courage to save our great nation as we have come to know it:

  4. EXACTLY…its one thing to be upset or outraged…however, if you feel truly maligned and feel the book is libelous…a person SUES
    i guess obama, being an attorney, knows that TRUTH is a complete defense to a libel action. larry sinclair is telling the truth

  5. Thank goodness Larry has had the intestinal fortitude to keep up the fight for over a year.
    I just love that man. He is like a rock. May god protect him as he moves forward with the truth.

  6. lookingforamerica

    Hey, Barack….maybe you and Michelle should be doin’ a little pillow talk tonite…come clean, married man. The wrath of the American electorate is peanuts compared to hers.

  7. fb274 — “No,” — Pelosi certified his NOMINATION — it is entirely up to the CANDIDATE to certify his “qualifications.” Obama is not let “off the hook” by this form, nor is the DNC itself. But, that’s now up for the Courts to decide if the DNC nominated an “unqualified” nominee. Clearly, the DNC never “vetted” Obama.

  8. The most significant revelation that will come from this book will be the link between Sinclair’s arrest after his National Press Club presser by Biden’s son in Delaware from Washington DC and then Biden’s selection as Vice President. I don’t think the general public is aware at all of this link in the chain and it will raise quite a few eyebrows. The country is aware of Sinclair’s claims but not of the extreme measure taken to silence him.

  9. Love this site!! Keep fighting the good fight!! Visit

  10. Glennmcgahee


  11. Glennmcgahee // November 28, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    Good point. Biden’s reward. Sinclair’s revenge. And Beau will be locking his AG self in jail and not the Senate.

  12. Found this on Lans forum. Looks like the Obama camp has been studying ways to change to Constitutional requirements for President for some time now 🙂

    I haven’t verified the sources, but it’s a very good read!

  13. I know this is crass, but I am sending copies of the Globe article about Obama/Sinclair to all my long-lost friends and acquaintances, who voted for Obama, tucked in my Christmas card this year. Beats the hell out of a “family letter”.

  14. FYI (Share the News):

    From American’s Must Know –

    Cort Wrotnowski’s case from Connecticut is now in the Supreme Court. That’s 3 cases in the Supreme Court Against Barack Obama!

    11/25/08 – After another battle with Mr. Bickell, the clerk that has a bad habit of obstructing justice, Cort Wrotnowski, with the help of Leo Donofrio (attorney handling the New Jersey Case), appealed his case from Connecticut to the United States Supreme Court. His case was docketed at 12:38 PM on 11/25/08 and Honorable Associate Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be looking at the case.

    From Atlas Shrugs:
    “Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.”

  15. I guess I can now consider myself a reader of tabloids… since this is the 3rd copy I’ve bought this year. At least I don’t buy/read the NewYorkTimes.

  16. Somehow, as we have seen during this election, Obama will have this covered up, changed to fit his own benefit, deny that he is an illegal alien, and whatever else he can do to make sure he is the next President. Did anyone notice that his $2 million dollar party that was in the works after the election was planned way BEFORE the votes were in? It was like he knew that he had won before the voters had completed the voting that evening.

  17. The South, thanks for the link. Here’s the text:

    The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the “stupidest provision” in the Constitution,1 “undecidedly un American,”2 “blatantly discriminatory,”3 and the “Constitution’s worst provision.”4 Since Arnold Schwarzenegger’s victory in the California gubernatorial recall election of 2003, commentators and policy-makers have once again started to discuss whether Article II of the United States Constitution should be amended to render naturalized citizens eligible for the presidency.5 Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution defines the eligibility requirements for an individual to become president. Article II provides:
    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Of-fice who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.6
    Although these sixty-two words are far from extraordinary, the natural born citizen provision is controversial because it prevents over 12.8 million Americans from being eligible for the presidency.7 In addition to Governor Schwarzenegger, the natural born citizen clause prohibits many other prominent Americans from becoming president, including Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm,8 former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Henry Kissinger, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao,9 and over 700 Medal of Honor Winners.10 Even though many of these individuals have served in high political positions or fought in a war on behalf of America, they are not able to become president simply because they were not born in the United States.11
    The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is out-dated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty. The increased globalization of the world continues to make each of these reasons more persuasive. As the world becomes smaller and cultures become more similar through globalization, the natural born citi-zen clause has increasingly become out of place in the American legal sys-tem. However, even though globalization strengthens the case for a Constitutional amendment, many Americans argue against abolishing the requirement. In a recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll taken November 19–21, 2004, only 31% of the respondents favored a constitutional amendment to abolish the natural born citizen requirement while 67% opposed such an amendment.12 Although some of the reasons for maintaining the natural born citizen requirement are rational, many of the reasons are based primarily on emotion. Therefore, although globalization is one impetus that should drive Americans to rely on reason and amend the Constitution, this paper argues that common perceptions about globalization ironically will convince Americans to rely on emotion and oppose a Constitutional amendment.
    Part one of this paper provides a brief history and overview of the natural born citizen requirement. Part two discusses the rational reasons for abolishing this requirement and describes why the increase in globalization makes abolishing the natural born citizen requirement more necessary than ever. Part three presents the arguments against allowing naturalized citizens to be eligible for the presidency and identifies common beliefs about glob-alization that will cause Americans to rely on emotion and oppose a Constitutional amendment.

    This is compatible with Bill Clinton’s statement 2 days ago while I attended one of his public talks.

    He argues for an “amendment to the Constitution”, allowing residents not born in the U.S., but who have for eg. “resided in the U.S. for 35 or 40 years” to be eligible for the presidency.

    Since none of what Clinton says is coincidental, I guess he’s probably referring to BO.

    I should also highlight that this statement was in response to a question from another political figure, that appeared to come from nowhere, since most of the questions related to the global economy. It was literally just out of the blue, leading me to suspect that the public needs to be prepared for this possibility.

  18. I’m not a supporter of Obama — and I think there’s something he’s hiding.

    However, in the Larry Sinclair case, there seems to be nothing but accusations from Larry Sinclair. The bottomline is that his accusations are his word against Barack Obama’s. Sorry…his credentials are a little too slimey to be handled.

    I think that by your supporting Larry Sinclair on Citizen Wells, you’re damaging the credibility of this fine blog. I’d distance myself from him immediately — and if you want to report on him, just let him voice his comments without judgement.

    BTW the reason Obama won’t file a suit is because doing so will lend credibility to the accusations and make this story MSM coverage — and Obama is too smart to be caught in that trap.

  19. Sorry Kalani,

    Your response is VERY old, try again.

  20. Kalani.
    When you have done all the work that I have, researched and asked all the questions that I have. then, perhaps, you can question my decision to cover the Larry Sinclair story.
    For those paying attention, the Obama camp has tried to suppress and discredit this story just like all the other stories.
    The American people deserved to read about this story and I did the job the MSM failed to do. Now the Globe has stepped up.
    Remember, no one believed the John Edwards story at first.
    Besides that, how can anyone doubt this story in the context of what we know about Obama.

  21. Please watch the following video for an explanation as to why Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen.

  22. If, according to Powell and others, we have to expect a crisis in january.
    I start to wonder if the fight is going to be against upset Obama voters after him being declared ineligible.
    Or is it going to be against citizens that want to uphold the constitution by declaring him ineligible?
    I am starting to think it is the latter.


    Here’s 2 responses back from South Carolina and Connecticut for request for records:


    2) Connecticut: RESPONSE FROM SECRETARY OF STATE OF Connecticut, IN WHICH SHE USES THE HAWAIIAN OFFICIALS PRESS CONFERENCE AS HER VETTING PROCESS OF OBAMA????!!! BIG PROBLEMS WITH THIS FOR HER. He was supposed to be vetted BEFORE he ran for office AND her statement about Hawaiian officials saying Obama was born in Hawaii and that they hold his original birth certificate is based on a PRESS CONFERENCE where Hawaii officials never said they verified he was born in Hawaii and they refused to answer if the original birth certificate they held was a Kenyan one or a Hawaiian one. AND THE PRESS CONFERENCE WAS IN NOVEMBER PER HER OWN ADMISSION – 3 MONTHS AFTER HE WAS DECLARED THE NOMINEE !!!

    2. SEC OF STATE OF Connecticut RESPONSE, 1 PAGE

  24. Dear Citizenwells:

    I know this is an ignorant question, but I’m not sure of all the facts in the cases. Isn’t it public knowledge that Obama was adopted by his step-father L. Soetoro in Indonesia? I have seen copies of his school registration papers which could only have been accepted had he been adopted by Soetoro and been an Indonesian citizen since non-citizens could not attend school in Indonesia. Also, at the time of his supposed adoption, a person could not be a dual citizen of both Indonesia and another country. Therefore, isn’t it a given that he is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. (this does not even take into account of his possible Kenyan birth)???? Why is the U.S. gov’t. ignoring the obvious?

    I would greatly appreciate your thoughts and help.


  25. venice — the complaint you are reporting is as old as the Republic — Martin van Buren was our first “natural born” president, and in the case of Chester A. Arthur, there is evidence that he was actually born on his family’s farm 100 miles into Quebec, instead of the tiny home in Vermont that is designated his “birthplace.”

    But he did succeed to the presidency after the assassination of president Garfield, because most people accepted the fact that he really was a Vermonter.

    The constitutional amendment that Clinton talks about is the Hatch Amendment, but it appears to be more of publicity stunt than anything else.

    Actually, there are a long list of Supreme Court decisions that prevent governors like Schwarzenegger and Granholm (for example) from becoming president, citing the common law all the way back to 1337.

    It is this list of decisions that will make it very difficult for Leo Donofrio’s case to prevail, if indeed Obama was actually born in Hawaii.

    In other words, Obama is better served by the decisions that currently stand as precedents, because then he is a natural born citizen, no matter where his parents were originally from [the “anchor baby” issue], unless he really was NOT born in Hawaii.

    The “anchor baby” issue is not new to this era, it was debated more than 200 years ago, when new immigrants were first coming to this country from Holland, Scotland and Ireland.

    Remember, the “natural born citizen” clause was inserted into the Constitution without debate, when the Constitutional Convention was writing the language concerning “Commander in Chief” of the Armed Forces of the United States. That is the point at which concerns about “divided loyalty” are most important.

  26. At the grocery store yesterday, I notice someone had gone around and covered up the Globe with other magazines, so you had to dig it out to find it, in order to buy it.

    But, I also noticed customers doing exactly that.

    I guess the “Obamabots” are EVERYWHERE! Not just on-line: but in-line also!

  27. To make things short —

    Obama wins hands down, if he WAS born in Hawaii. — All of these challenges will vanish in a flash!

    So there has to be a reason why he spends a lot of money (other people’s money), and doesn’t simply hand over his birth certificate.

    The growing suspicion (and not just my own) is that he can’t! It’s all as simple as that!

  28. Kalani

    I think that Obama supporters won’t care either way if the story (Sinclair) is true (or not).

    The point that has been made time and time again is the EXTREME MEASURES that the Obama camp has gone to (including abuse of power), in order to shut-up Larry Sinclair.

    It is UNprecedented that Obama can get away with all that they have done to him this last year.

    The media reported false stories about Palin’s daughter, McCain’s “affair”… and even went as far as to report stories from ANONYMOUS sources that turned out to be false… why not report the Sinclair story?

  29. Kalani

    “The bottomline is that his accusations are his word against Barack Obama’s.”

    Obama has not said a “word” about this.

  30. Because of all the lies (I would never vote for FISA … Ayers was just a guy who lived in my neighborhood … I never heard Wright say those things, etc) and all the deception and all the coverups and the hiding of all his proof of citizenship papers (birth cert, college papers, etc), at this point, I actually don’t believe a single word he ever says!

    This morning I heard someone say on TV that Obama is “considering” not raising taxes on the “rich” and I said aloud to the TV “Yeah, right”. He will say anything to show he has control over the Dow so we continue to think he’s a god. He will say anything to make people think he’s OK because he knows the Supreme Court cases are coming up.

    And when he steps down without showing his birth certificate (will claim illness or whatever), then everyone will be sad instead of angry. “Oh, what a great President he would have been” and in the meantime that’s how he will escape jail. And Senators do not have to prove to be a natural born citizen, neither do Cabinet members so if he lies about illness, he could still remain in politics.

    Anyway, that’s my gut feeling. And I think he will step down quietly the second week in December (between SCOTUS week and electors week).

  31. On Dec 5 the Supreme Court will either allow or disallow the usurpation of both the Constitution and the Government of the United States — easily the most pivotal decision since our nation’s founding — and the silence of the news media is deafening (if not downright scary).

  32. “And I think he will step down quietly the second week in December (between SCOTUS week and electors week).”

    I hope You are right Janet.

  33. Chris

    I am hearing that for the FIRST TIME, there MAY be LEGISLATION that confirms someone running for POTUS, will have an investigative process to confirm “natural born citizen”.

    We must help with this process.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s