We the People Foundation has published a letter in the Chicago Tribune today, Monday, December 1, 2008
and will publish another on December 8, 2008. Here is an exerpt from the We the People Foundation site:
“Our full-page Open Letter to Mr. Obama will be published in the Chicago Tribune
on both Monday, December 1, 2008 and Wednesday, December 3, 2008. It will appear in the main news section. Click here to view a copy of the final ad.
Chicago is Mr. Obama’s hometown. His transition team is operating out of the Kluczynski Federal Building in downtown Chicago. He is known to be a regular reader of the Tribune, Chicago’s principal newspaper, with a daily circulation of over a half-million readers.
The Open Letter to Mr. Obama is a formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States of America. Mr. Obama is respectfully requested to direct the Hawaiian officials to provide access to his original birth certificate on December 5-7 by our team of forensic scientists, and to provide additional documentary evidence establishing his citizenship status prior to our Washington, D.C. press conference on December 8.”
Here is the text of the Letter:
“An Open Letter
to Barack Obama:
Are you a Natural Born
Citizen of the U.S.?
Are you legally eligible to
hold the Office of President?
We The People Foundation
For Constitutional Education, Inc.
2458 Ridge Road Queensbury, NY 12804
December 1, 2008
Mr. Barack Obama
Barack Obama Transition Office
Kluczynski Federal Building
230 So. Dearborn St.
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Dear Mr. Obama:
Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also
taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America,
I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the
Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding
the Office of President by the ?natural born citizen? clause of the U.S.
Constitution. For instance:
You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughlydiscredited,
computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a formthat lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed
Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of
attending physician and age of mother.
Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were bornin Hawaii.
Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya.
Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birthin Kenya.
U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child bornin Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19
years of age.
In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S.citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming
a naturalized Indonesian citizen.
You have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when
challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have
been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order
you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.
Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of
your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in
order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.
Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President
you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution.
You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence.
Should you assume the office as anyone but a
bona fide natural borncitizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you
would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic
peace and stability of the Nation. For example:
You would always be viewed by many Americans as aposeur – a
As a usurper , you would be unable to take the required ?Oath orAffirmation? on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or
false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the
Office of the President of the United States.
You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support fromthe People.
The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remainobedient to you.
No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any ofyour proclamations, Executive Orders or directives, as such orders
would be legally void.
Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.
Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation becauseit would not be able to acquire the signature of a
bona fide President.
Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper , from the Officeof the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos
including a potential for armed conflicts within the General
Government or among the States and the People to effect the
removal of such a
usurper .In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the
total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility,
I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a
Redress of this violation of the Constitution.
With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate
Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth
certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday,
December 5, 6 and 7, 2008.
In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to
the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 am on December 8, 2008,
marked for my attention:
A certified copy of your original, signed ?vault? birth certificate.
Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in thenames Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack
Dunham and Barry Dunham.
A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.
A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.
Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College,Columbia University and Harvard Law School.
Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote
on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are
a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public
record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are
barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the
Constitution?s eligibility requirements.
All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary
evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility,
they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.
In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiledif it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent,
the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people
by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy
.? Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.
Robert L. Schulz
Read the formatted letter here:
I’m sure they will receive no response.
Christian Science Monitor:
This is in the Philadelphia newspaper this am.
“…and will publish another on December 8, 2008” (it’s the 3rd which you confirm shortly afterwards. The formatting looks weird though (I’m using IE7).
Haven’t heard a bleep about it all day in the MSM…..love the bulletin article
Section 1, page 21 – confirmed.
If the courts ignore the conctitution regarding the Obama eligibility,maybe there needs to be a Million Man March on DC protesting the courts failure to follw the constitution.
Maybe the MSM would pay attention if they couldn’t get to work on a Monday morning!
Today, someone substituting for Rush, got a call asking about the 4 current suits regarding BO’s citizenship… highlighting these are CONSTITUTIONAL legalities.
I was surprised he was allowed to speak
Instead of going through the whole dialog, the bottom line, is we need CITIZEN OUTRAGE.
You cannot get CITIZEN OUTRAGE, unless Citizens know about it.
Somehow, we need to get msm including CNN (perhaps Dobb’s) and FOX to MENTION THESE CASES !!!! ????
I am so sick of this.
They report anonymous remarks, Palin’s red shoes, false allegations ALL DAY LONG.
THESE COURT CASES ARE REAL, and not one of these so called “reporter’s” will make the public AWARE.
Hannity keeps saying “the MSM is DEAD”… as far as I am concerned, he is part of THEM. He is fully aware of these suits, and does not mention them on FOX.
Bunch of LOSERS!!!
I heard about the birth certificate on Bill Cunningham’s radio show (he took over for Drudge) last night, and I heard about it on Rush’s radio show today. There was a guest host on today since Rush is sick.
Pogo was right……
“We have met the enemy and he is us!”
Don’t be fooled any of this! The media know ALL know all about these cases, and they are following their progress minutely though weblogs such as Citizen Wells and websites such as World Net Daily. —
This was proved beyond doubt by Lester Kinsolving’s question at the White House Press Briefing with Tony Fratto, by the fact that there was not a single follow-up question when Tony Fratto refused to answer Lester.
What this meant was, the media already knew everything there was to know about these cases, and they didn’t need to “follow-up” with a question that the deputy press secretary was refusing to answer — something they would have done, if there was anyone there who didn’t know what Lester was talking about.
So, you see, they all knew, because there was NO follow up question.
What I’m surprised by is the cat-and-mouse game being played by someone at SCOTUS. This is highly unprofessional, and will be a dark stain against the credibility of the High Court, if it is allowed to continue on much longer.
The Framers understood that the keepers of the Constitution are the People — not the President, not the Congress, and not the Courts.
We pay their salaries. — They work for us. — They better get at it!
They thrive off our taxes — if we don’t earn anything, we can’t pay them, and if we don’t spend anything, they won’t have anything to spend, either.
Even Arnold Schwarzenegger is facing a taxpayer revolt in California, I see this morning. That’s going to be the future for ALL of them, if they don’t want to turn up the volume on their hearing aids and begin to listen to us!
Good Morning, Citizen Wells —
Obama Birth Certificate Rears Its Head – Again
The burden of proof is on Obama. He has to prove by producing verifiable evidence that he is a natural born citizen of the U.S. It’s NOT the other way around (that those who question it must show evidence that he is not).
As to a claim that the fact that some 60 million+ Americans voted for Obama doesn’t settle anything because they did believe that Obama was natural born citizen of the U.S. Should he be not, these 60 million+ voters should be considered scammed to voting on an ineligible candidate.
Suppose, you signed a contract to buy a property from someone based on forged title that the seller presented to you. Do you think the crook would have any chances of having that contract executed in court? I don’t think so. Scamming someone into a consent based on fake evidence has never been considered a lawfully binding act.
The worshipers of Obama may wish to take a note of this.
I have just this moment learned that the Supreme Court has refuesed to hear the issue of Obama’s citicizenship status. We the American People have a right to ensure the individual that will be the President of this Nation fulfills his obligations to this country and to us the people. If this man is indeed constitutionally ineligilbe to hold the office of President, then we have the right to have this proved out. The Supreme court needs to remember, 1. they are not God 2. they work for us the people and we have asked them to do their jobs, not refuse to do so because they think they are in total control. If this is the case we need a completly new membership on the court. Theirs is a responsibility to interpret the law, not make it! They will be culpable, if in fact these alligations are proved out as truth, in the tennents this will set and the damage that could be done in the future to this nation.
Why is the press and the judicial body turning a blind eye to this issue, unless there is something to it? I had to show a certified birth certificate on a number of occasions, Driver’s license to enter school, etc. Why is this such an issue with Mr. Obama? It is a simple remedy – provide the birth records unless you have something to hide that will be evidenced by producing the documents?
If you remember, Mr. McCain had to go through the process when Mr. Obama’s campaign pointed out he was born in Panama. Mr. Obama sent a number of people to Alaska to discredit Ms. Palin, even dug into her husband’s background. Why is he above the process and the law for that matter? This is beginning to smack of a cover-up on a number of levels. Why should something so simple to do to provide an answer to this issue being guarded, buried, protected and sweept under the rug if there is nothing to the claim?
If there is something to these aligations, allowing him to move forward and take the oath of office will be a serious threat to the future of our security among many other issues. Our forefathers crafted the constitution the way they did for a reason – one of which was national security. As a tax paying citizen, as a natural born citizen who is required to provide birth documentation for a myriad of reasons, I have a right to demand that Mr. Obama provide what is being asked of him in this regard. Is he any better than the rest of Us? Every individual that enters the military is required to provide birth documentation, why is the future commander in chief not required to provide the same basic process as the men he is to command? I had to go through a full background investigation when my son was issued a high security level in the military and he as commander in cheif should be immune to the same investigations?? The larger question is “Why was this information not looked at more throughly when he was vetted for the offices he has held prior to this and for the process of running for the office of President? Someone (s) did not do their job, is this part of the reason it is being covered up? Every negative thing that could be printed and talked about regarding the Clintons’ the Bush’s, the Palin’s and certainly the McCains was covered by the media, why do we not hear anything negative regarding the Obama’s? Again smacking of coverup.