Category Archives: Criminal Complaint

Jerome Corsi, Kenya, ODM strategy, Obama, Raila Odinga,Kenyan Elections, Petition to Impeach Obama, Sean Hannity, Obama Kenya 2006,Logan Act, Odinga Massacre, Hannity Radio Show, Fox Hannity show

Jerome Corsi was in Kenya recently on a fact finding mission. He was
detained by the Kenyan Government and allegedly deported. Sean Hannity
spoke to Mr. Corsi today after Corsi arrived in England. Here are some comments I received on this blog today:

“I just heard that Corsi was on Hannity’s radio program already and said he has a “bombshell” to drop about Obama!!! Did anyone else hear this?”
“BREAKING NEWS!

educatedwhitewoman informs us of PROOF Corsi brought back from Kenya – implicating Obama with Odinga and his masacre! Hannity had Corsi on the phone from London this past hour.”
“Please Inform Mr. Berg that Corsi has secured documentation and Email evidence that connects Obama with Odinga and it shows direct connections and involvement in the Kenyan elections…….

This is a violation of the Logan Act.”
“FYI, Jerome Corse was on the phone today from England on The Sean Hannity Radio Show.

Corse will present paper evidence that Obama communicated via e-mail from his Washington office with a member of the Kenyan Government; instructing that Kenyan official how to deal with an election if you loose. EG, Claim voter fraud, riots and the like.”
Approximately two months ago, this blog and the Petition to Impeach, expel
Senator Obama site received a document and story regarding Obama’s visit
to Kenya in 2006 as well as a document leaked from the ODM party of
Raila Odinga. From the comments above, it appears that Jerome Corsi may
have the same document that was revealed on this blog almost two months
ago.

Here is the Citizen Wells article with a copy of the ODM game plan:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/obama-odm-action-plan-odm-document-january-20-2008-obama-campaign-mirrors-raila-odinga-campaign-ridicule-old-people-ethnic-tensions-violence/

Now visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Is this the document that Jerome Corsi has?

I have referred to this document several times in articles that compare
the strategy of the Obama camp to that of Raila Odinga and the ODM party.
The full document can be viewed at the above link. Here is some of the
text of the ODM Game plan:

“EXECUTIVE BRIEF ON THE POSITIONING AND MARKETING OF THE ORANGE
DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT & ìTHE PEOPLEíS PRESIDENTî ñ Hon Raila A Odinga

Core Strategy Team:

Prof Peter A Nyongo, Secretary General ODMProf Edward Oyugi AkongoProf Patrick WanyandeProf Larry GumbeMr Adams Oloo

1. Purpose
1.0
To ensure that the Orange Democratic Movement (hereinafter referred to as
ìODMî) remains united and focused through out the national presidential campaigns
period.
2.0
TO ensure that Hon Raila Amolo Odinga is elected the fourth president of the Republic
of Kenya in succession to the current President Mwai Kibaki
3.0
To ensure that Hon Raila Amolo Odinga secures an absolute majority of parliamentary
seats in the tenth parliament to facilitate the ease of the intended constitutional
reform.

2. Preamble
2.0
The just conclude ODM Presidential nominations have ended the speculation and
competition within the ODM ranks with Hon. Raila Amolo Odinga (hereinafter
referred to as the Candidateî) emerging as the Partyís presidential torch bearer. The
enthusiasm and overacting support extended towards the Candidate have debunked
the myth that
a
As a member of the Luo community Hon Raila Odinga is not electable to thepresidency in Kenya

This document is intended to provide the conceptual guidelines and roadmap for
the periods leading up to the presidential elections set for December 2007. This
document notes the challenges and obstacles likely to confront the Candidate.
These include

.
Hon Kalonzo Musyokaís potential to play spoiler

.
The involvement role of ex-President Daniel arap Moi, his financial
resources country-wide political network, experience and strong following
in the Rift Valley.

.
Kibakis incumbency and track record

.
The financial muscle of the Mt Kenya elite and their potential to play
rough and dirty.

The following pages outline a strategy for overcoming the odds and delivering the presidency
to Hon Raila Odinga and ODM in the December elections.

Strengths


Hon Raila is charismatic and ambitious

Kenyans appreciate him as a fearless crusader for truth, justice and democracy

Has no publicly debated allegations of corruption


Great crowd puller/mobiliser/entertainer

Descends from a legendary family

100% devoted following of the Luo community

Recognized as the individual best credited with the incumbent election to
President in 2002

Won the 2005 Constitution Referendum

Anchored by tribal chiefs with the potential to draw multi-regional support
Weaknesses


Limited understanding on economic matters

Has been faulted as having exhibited a knack for political party relationship
nomadism


Association with Communism

Potential for linkage to the underdevelopment in Nyanza


The 1982 coup

Acrimonious parting of ways with Wamalwa Kijana (Luhya Western) Moi
(Kalenjin, Rift Valley) Kibaki (Gema, Mt Kenya region) and Kalonzo
(Kamba , Eastern)

Matters surrounding corruption allegations related to the molasses plant,
Kisumu and implications of corruption as alleged by the Ndungu Report
Opportunities


Pin down Mwai Kibaki on his 2002 promise to be a one term president

Capitalize on matters related to the dishonoured MoU of 2002

Take advantage of Mwai Kibakisí Laziness and laidback attitude

Exploit anti-Kikuyu sentiments


Leverage the vulnerability of the Kibaki administration responses to corruption
matters as the Anglo-leasing and Goldenberg scandal. Seize this
opportunity to confront him with a powerful anti-corruption campaign message

Ditto the £130b stashed away by Kanu leaders

Artur brothers and their raid to the Standard Group
Threats

 

The Candidates religion and perceived state of religiosity

The publicís perception of the candidateís Communism

Kibera in his Langata constituency is the least developed and most volatile area of

Nairobi

 

Damage incurred from Hon Rutoís recorded statements on the Candidates unelectability
 

The Candidates potential for ad-hoc and imrpovised statements

DEDUCTION

Based on the above SWOT

a the Candidateís Strengths and Opportunities significantly outweigh hisweaknesses.

b The Candidates/Party popularity is imminent should we recreate andmaintain the euphoria achieved during the 2005 Constitutional Referendum
and in the last General Election.

RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
The Grand Entrance
As earlier agreed in order that our candidate campaigns commence with impact, it is necessary
that he exit Kenya to lay foundation for a grand home coming similar to Matibasin 1992 and Kibakis in 2002. Whereas the party has identified areas such as Nigeria and
Middle East as regions of interest, it is recommended that the Candidate focus on Europeand the United States where Diaspora is active) for this purpose. A lengthy absence will
starve the country of Hon Raila and stimulate an outpouring of adoration that will take usto victory.

Kikuyu Alienation

Owing to this strategyís success during the 2005 referendum, it is the partyís position itshould be utilized once more for the General Election. There is overwhelming feeling
among the non-Gema communities that the Kikuyu are selfish bigots dedicated to a tribalhegemony who will never share the spoils of government with other communities. Underpinning
this strategy is the blessing that ODM campaign has able pointmen in Mudavadi,
Ruto, Balala and Ntimama who can efficiently galvanize their respective communities
around the anti-kikuyu initiative. Concurrently, every effort must be made to undermine
Kalonzo in order to prevent him from emerging as an alternative avenue for antikikuyu
sentiment. In this regard, particular caution should be placed on regions such asRVP where Kalonzo has the potential of attracting some of our votes. Anti-Kikuyuism
must be reinforced with promises of jobs and economic gains to key players from everycommunity supporting this initiative.

The Class Issue

It is possible to trigger a class war by painting the Kibaki Government as an insensitive,
uncaring group of Muthaiga Golf clubbers. Available research also suggests that this
strategy could also resonate with poor kikuyu youth who feel economically marginalized
by their own government. As part of this strategy the party should seek to elevate the
emotions within all youth constituents who may it successful, be willing to vote for us inthe protest. Visible signs of class disparity will provide important fodder for this theme.

Pro-West

It is absolutely essential that through out this campaign, Raila remain aligned to theWestern Countries (such as the United States) in order to take advantage of the deteriorating
relationship between them and Kibaki. ODM can expect both financial and politicalsupport particularly from the United States.

Pull All Plugs

This being the contest of a lifetime, the party should employ all available means to ensurea victory. Subterranean campaigns will therefore form a critical component of our activi

ties. Corruption in the Kibaki Government, the mess of Kibakis domestic situation and
the soap opera of the Artur brothers provide ready material for this war.
The Media
Since 2005, the Orange team has maintained intimate contacts across all media. Even
though a number of senior media managers are active in our campaigns, we should establish
strongest Media Centre possible, manned by local and international experts. Indeed,
we must approach this issue with the understanding that victory in the media war could
very well mean victory at the polls.
Identify the Fixers.
There is no doubt that the key regional point men are invaluable to this campaign as
without them the whole thing could tumble. In order\ to insulate the candidate from attacks
on his person, not all advertising and campaign efforts should be focused on him.
At the same time, all possible efforts should be used to retain discipline among the party
leadership, including reminding them of their vulnerability.
Funding
Tap into pledged funding from external donors including Federal Republic of Nigeria,
Germany, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Libya, The Democratic Republic of
Congo as well as individual /institutional caucuses such as GTZ network, Cyril Ramaphosa,
the Deya Ministries and US Republicans among others.
Below is the schedule of activities that will lead to the implementation of our strategy
Strategy
Rationale
How to Activate
When to Activate
Action By:
The Anti-Kikuyu crusade
1. This is an important wedge issue. It will help galvanise the rest of the country against a
common enemy and set the overall theme of our campaign
1. Mass media (allusion to predominance of Kikuyus in public service and business
2. Public Rallies
3 Leaflets

4 Viral e-mail and SMS
Through out the campaign period, heightened activities three weeks before elections
All members R.O. to lead the execution of this strategyUhuru Kenyatta as Kibakis Choice for 2012

1. 1. Accentuate the anti-Kikuyu sentiments.
2. Cause unease within PNU ranks
3.Attract Luhya vote by eliminating the belief that there will be a Luhya successor
4. Communicate the intention to retain power within a select group of prominent political
families
(Kenyatta, Moi, Kibaki)
1.
Speculative newspaper articles /opeds

 
1.
Public pronouncements at all campaign rallies

 
1.
Blogs/web forums

 
1.
Leaflets, with special focus on Western Kenya and RVPImmediately, with heightened media activities end of November

1.
Kipkoech Tanui & Okech Kendo.
2. R.O
Majimbo
5. Majimbo present the promise to the electorate that they will retain their resources
at the exclusion of foreigners particularly the Kikuyu, Akamba and the Indians. It is particularly
important in galvanising the Coastal vote.
1. Public Rallies in RVP Western and Coast
2. Op-Ed columns in the mainstream media
3. TV/FM radio call in shows
4.
Public forums such as workshops with high profile personalities such as Ghai.
5.
Immediate heightened activities sin December
Ruto to lead campaign team.
CorruptionBranding the opponent as irredeemably corrupt will provide diversionary salvos and a
campaign theme worth pursuing through out the electioneering period.

1.
Press conferences, themed under specific premises such as Telkom and Safaricom
sale.
2.
TV, Radio, Billboard advertising.
3.
Newspaper articles, radio and TV talkshows.
4.
Campaign Rallies
5. Viral email, Mashada Blogs, You tube and SmSThrough out the campaign period with heightened activities in NOV/DEC

All RO to provide core leadership.
The Githongo DossierGithongo has so far provided the most important ammunition in branding the opponent as
irredeemably corrupt. He still is capable of killer blowRelease more incriminating recordings from his time in Government10 days before electionsJ Odindo to provide Nation forum.

R.O. to release material already in custodyThe Artur Brothers
6.
This Saga presents unending opportunities to embarrass the Kibaki teamInduce brothers to release their long awaited book at the right moment. Our mediapartners are waiting to serialize the contents.
Two weeks before the elections

R.O
The age issueOur core supporters are essentially young people whoa re angry about the domination ofKibaki politics by frail septuagenarians.
Billboards and leaflets ridiculing the old people in the Kibaki team; contrast this withbillboards of Hon Raila with young people- the promise of a buoyant future.
immediatelyCommunication team
Rigging
1. Prepare ground for rejection of
1. Press conferences
Oct/Nov/ DecAll
Unfavourable results 2.Increase interest in monitoring activities to ensure no rigging
happens

3. Deflect attention from ourselves should opportunities be available to manipulate voterturnout in our green areas.
1.
Op-Ed Columns
1.
TV/FM radio call-in shows

 
1.
Petitions to embassies and ODM- friendly NGOsí
1.
Public Rallies

Ethnic Tensions/Violence as a lastResort
To discourage voter participation in hostile areas
1.
Continue pro-Majimbo utterances

 
1.
Use ODM agents on the ground to engineer ethnic tensions in target areas

 
1.
Support Kapondiís forces in Mt. Elgon

 
1.
Leaflets targeting the Kikuyus, Kisiis, etcMid-Dec
Bring Alexanda Sitienei”

Acorn Voter Fraud, Obama, Fox News report, Missouri Voter Fraud, Catholic Bishops report, NC Board of Elections, FBI investigations, Contact state boards, Philip J Berg, Obama Indonesian, Obama fraud

Fox news had a segment on Acorn voter fraud today, Wednesday, October
8, 2008. They indicated that the FBI is currently conducting voter
fraud investigations in 10 states.
A Fox reporter was in Missouri at
the Board of Elections where the FBI was gathering evidence. The
reporter found 8 registration forms with the same name. He held up
approximately 500 forms that were suspect and will be evaluated by the
FBI.

Tomorrow, I am going to contact the NC Board of Elections and ask what
is being done to prevent voter fraud and if there are any ongoing
investigations. Several days ago I emailed and called the NC Board of
Elections to ask if they were aware of the Philip J Berg lawsuit that
states that Obama is ineligible to be president. It is clear Obama is
still a citizen of Indonesia
. The gentleman I spoke to tried to do all
of the talking and mentioned the lawsuit filed against John McCain. He
tried to equate the McCain citizenship and eligibility status to that
of Obama. I hope that the legal staff there is better informed, The two
cases are totally different.

Voter fraud and Acorn voter fraud is a serious issue. Factor in Obama’s
long time association with Acorn and there is a real conflict of interest.
Just a few weeks ago, the Obama campaign was caught funneling over $ 800,000 to Acorn and was required to file an amended statement
of expenditures.

Anyone still unclear about Acorn, their history and objectives, should
read the prior post on this blog. We discovered a report that was
prepared for the Catholic Bishops that clearly reveals Acorn’s
motives and performance.

If I do not get a satisfactory, timely response from the NC Board of
Elections, I will take my plea to a higher level of government and
perhaps the judicial system.

I urge each of you to contact your State Board of Elections and ask
what is being done to prevent voter fraud, voice your concern over
Acorn and ask if they are aware of the Philip J Berg lawsuit.

Help Philip J Berg uphold justice:

http://obamacrimes.com

Visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama

http://obamaimpeachment.org

* Last minute addition *

Michelle Malkin has done a superb job of covering the Obama, Acorn connection. I would like to thank Jeff Schreiber for bringing this article to my attention.

“The ACORN/Obama Voter Registration “Thug Thizzle”
by Michelle Malkin”

 
“Systemic corruption of our election process continues. Barack Obama and his old friends at ACORN and Project Vote are leading the way. This radical revolution is taking place in your backyard. And as I’ve reported before, this voter-fraud racket is on your dime.
On Monday, the two liberal groups announced the wrap-up of a 21-state voter registration drive targeting low-income people and minorities in battleground states including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Florida, New Mexico and Wisconsin.

What’s wrong with that? For starters, these two groups are militant partisan outfits purporting to engage in nonpartisan civic activity. And their campaign comes amid an avalanche of fresh voter-fraud allegations involving ACORN in many of those same key states.”

Read more here:

http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/10/08/the_acornobama_voter_registration_thug_thizzle

Obama, Acorn, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Voter fraud, Seize power, Saul Alinsky, Raila Odinga, Obama and Acorn socialists, Smoking gun

If you are not aware of the many ties Obama has to Acorn, you have some
work to do. You can find more on this blog, Michelle Malkin’s site,
Stanley Kurtz articles and many other good sources. Acorn has been
involved in voter fraud for years and just yesterday, the Las Vegas
office of Acorn was raided by law enforcement. Acorn was also a major
force in creating the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac mortgage and financial
crisis.

Below is an exerpt from an official Acorn document. Read it carefully,
noting the highlighted words and relate their philosophy and actions
to current events. By all means, ask questions, do more reading and
tell everyone you know. As John McCain stated in the debate last night,
check the records of both candidates.
“ACORN Report
The ACORN Report is published by ACORN’s National Office and contains up-to-date information. We have ACORN Reports indexed by date and topic available.”

“City Limits February 1999
During its 15 years in New York City, ACORN has helped squatters claim derelict city-owned property, forced bankers to invest in low-income communities, and organized a war against the city’s workfare program.

It’s also developed a reputation for no-holds-barred tactics—getting results through adversarial campaigns against bankers, politicians and bureaucrats using confrontation and concession rather than consensus. ACORN, unlike most social service non-profits, scorns charity. Their goal is to help poor people seize power.”

This comes straight from the Acorn national office.
Note the following:

“Their goal is to help poor people seize power”

It does not say, as John Mccain or Ronald Reagan would say, help poor
people to better themselves and their economic condition, but rather
“seize power.”

This comes straight out of the playbook of Obama, Saul Alinsky and Raila Odinga.

If you are outraged at this attempt to socialize America, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Read the Acorn article:

http://web.archive.org/web/20010421194739/www.acorn.org/acorn-reports/acornrep.politics.content.html

McCain Obama Town Hall Meeting, Nashville TN, October 7, 2008, Breaking news, Jerome Corsi deported from Kenya, Philip J Berg, Obama and Berg motions, Larry Sinclair in Nashville, Tony Rezko talking, Acorn Voter Fraud Raid

John McCain and Barack Obama are holding a Town Hall Meeting at
Belmont University in Nashville TN, Tuesday, October 7, 2008, as part
of the presidential debates. The intensity of the campaigns is heating up and just yesterday McCain referred to Obama as a liar. Will there be
any surprises tonight?

Consider the following breaking news stories today:

  • Jerome Corsi, was detained by the Kenyan government and deported today. He was there for further investigations into Obama’s connections to Raila Odinga and Kenya.
  • Both Philip J Berg and Obama filed motions yesterday in the lawsuit that states that Obama is a citizen of Indonesia and is ineligible to be
    president.
  • The Chicago Tribune today reported that federal prosecutors have filed a motion requesting an indefinite delay in sentencing Tony Rezko. This is clearly a move to allow him to talk.
  • Larry Sinclair is in Nashville. Sinclair is in town to share his story
    of a drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999. Sinclair will also share his contact with Donald Young, the TUCC choir director, shortly before he was murdered in December 2007 and also to inform the public about the Philip J Berg lawsuit.
  • ACORN Vegas Office Raided in Voter Fraud Investigation

So, will any of this breaking news make it to the Town Hall meeting?

Read more about Larry Sinclair:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com

Help Philip J Berg  enforce the constitution:

http://obamacrimes

View and sign the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Larry Sinclair, Nashville TN, McCain, Obama, Town Hall Meeting, Vanderbilt University, First Amendment Center, October 7, 2008

Larry Sinclair is in Nashville TN for the McCain Obama Town Hall Meeting, “The 2008 Presidential Election: Where We Stand and Where We Are Headed”  forum at Vanderbilt University and to tell his story about a drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999. Sinclair will also share his knowledge of Donald Young, the gay TUCC choir leader, and also to inform the public about the Philip J Berg lawsuit.

Larry Sinclair’s message this morning:

“Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Good Morning Nashville Day 2

Good Morning. Today will be spent getting the truth out about Barack Obama in a respectful and dignified manner. After all, we are nothing like the Obama supporters/surrogates who engage in lies, threats, harassment and misrepresentations.

I can be contacted today at 612-466-1043 and will be in the Downtown area as well as at Belmont University.

After today’s events in Nashville, I will be leaving for Florida this evening.”

Despite attempts by Obamanots to block him, Larry Sinclair attended the  “The 2008 Presidential Election: Where We Stand and Where We Are Headed” forum at Vanderbilt University. This is taken from the Vandebilt website:
“Vanderbilt and First Amendment Center to host presidential election panel
John Seigenthaler and Harold Ford Jr. to lead discussion by national experts”
Harold Ford Jr.
Political scholars, journalists and pundits will offer their informed perspective on where the 2008 presidential election is headed during an Oct. 7 forum for students that is sponsored by Vanderbilt University and the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt.
“The 2008 Presidential Election: Where We Stand and Where We Are Headed” will be led by John Seigenthaler, founder of the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt, and Harold Ford Jr., a visiting professor of political science at Vanderbilt and former congressman. The discussion will be from 10 a.m. to noon.
“We are delighted to offer our students this rare opportunity to hear the views of leading national political experts who have been tracking Barack Obama and John McCain throughout this turbulent campaign,” said Ford, who is a political analyst on MSNBC for NBC News. The former congressman is helping teach a popular Vanderbilt course on the 2008 presidential and congressional elections.
    Among the panelists scheduled to participate:
    Mike Allen, chief political correspondent for Politico, who previously covered national politics for Time and The Washington Post.
    John Geer, Distinguished Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt and an expert on campaigns, public opinion and negative ads. Geer wrote In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns, 1960-2004.
    Howard Fineman, Newsweek’s senior Washington correspondent and columnist, senior editor and deputy Washington bureau chief. He is also an NBC News analyst.
    Anne Kornblut, writer for The Washington Post. She has been a guest on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews.
    Joe Klein, senior writer and columnist for Time and author of best-selling political novel Primary Colors.  
     Mark Halperin, senior political analyst and editor-at-large for Time. He is also a political analyst for ABC News.
    John Harwood, chief Washington correspondent and columnist, senior editor and deputy Washington bureau chief. He is also an NBC analyst.
    Chris Matthews, host of “Hardball with Chris Matthews” on MSNBC. 
    Seigenthaler, who is chairman emeritus of The Tennessean, will serve as moderator for the forum. Seating is limited, and students will be given preference.”
  
For more news about Vanderbilt’s election experts:
 www.vanderbilt.edu/news/election.
Read more from Larry Sinclair and contribute to his tour:
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com

Philip J Berg lawsuit, New filings, T B Bradley, Jane Doe, October 7, 2008, Legal source says filings suspect

There were two filings in the Philip J Berg lawsuit on Tuesday, October
7, 2008. A legal source I spoke to a few minutes ago said that court
contacts indicated they had no merit. Repeat, I have no official response
from Philip J Berg on these filings. Here are parts of both:

First filing:

“IN THE UN LTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENl\SYLVANIA

CASE NO. 02-08-CV-04083
PHILLIP BERG, ESQ.
PLAIl\T1FF

V.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., AKA BARRY SOETORO, CITIZEN OF
INDONESIA
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
DEFEl\DANTS

MOTION FOR APPLICATION TO INTERVENE WITH COMPLAINT

AND
PETITION fOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS UJRECTED TO THE AGENCIES
OF THE UNITED STATES
AND MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
COMES NOW, Ur. T.B. Bradley, Psy.D., (hereinafter “Applicant”) hereby
formally applies to the Court for leave to intervene in the instant case with
Complaint and Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directed to the Agencies of
the United States and Motion for Injunctive Relief previously filed August
28,2008 at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and
petitions this Honorable Court for a Writ of Mandamus Directed to the
Agencies of the United States. If leave is granted by this Court, Applicant
requests this Court provide written notice to all interested parties of same.

Applicant hereby states:

1. Applicant is a Forensic Psychologist who works for the Criminal
Justice System and the Courts.
2. Upon reading all of the books written by or about Barack Hussein
Obama, Jr. aka Barry 50etoro, (hereinafter Obama) Applicant
discerned that Obama was not a natural born citizen of the United
States or if he was a natural born citizen that he had lost his
citizenship when his biological mother married Lolo Soetoro, a
citizen of Indonesia. And, Obama then became a citizen of Indonesia
as a result of his mother’s expatriation of herself and her son, by selfdeclaration
on legal public educational records that Obama was
formally known as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia.
3. Hence, Applicant discerned that Obama was not US Constitutionally
qualified to hold the Office of the United States Senator from Tllinois
or the Office of the President of the United States.

4. Without any knowledge whatsoever of the instant case filed August
21,2008, Applicant filed the Complaint at the United States District
Court -See Exhibit A.
5. Later, Plaintiff discovered a similar action, the instant case, and
provided Judicial Notice to the US District Court of same-See Exhibit
B.
6. Shortly thereafter, Applicant discerned that Obama’s Mother
engaged in a pattern of illegal and fraudulent conduct as a result of
both of her two children’s birth outside of the United States: (1)
Obama, Jr. born in Kenya Africa and (2) Maya Soetoro born in Jakarta
Indonesia, but the mother, a US Citizen, raced to Hawaii after each of
her children’s birth where she engaged in fraudulent conduct upon
the United States by declaring a late registration birth for both
children claiming that they were born in Hawaii.
7. In fact, this pattern of fraudulent conduct is evidenced by the fact that
Obama, Jr. was born in Africa and her second child, Maya Soetoro,
was born in Jakarta, Indonesia; however, both children are allegedly
registered with birth certificates as born in the United States.
8. Obama’s mother defrauded the United States not once, but twice due
to her out of US births of her children that she desperately sought to
protect by late registration births with false and fraudulent
information declaring that both children were born on US soil.

9. If in fact, Obama was born on US Soil, he lost any US citizenship he
may have held when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, moved to
Indonesia, expatriated bother herself and her son as a result of her
marriage and by self-declaration on legal, public, educational records
that Obama was the step-son of Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia,
and that Obama ‘s name was changed to Barry Soetoro, now a citizen
of Indonesia.
1O.For all intents and purposes, Obama, remains a citizen of Indonesia
to this day.

I1.Unless he has applied for naturalization of US Citizenship after the
age of 18 and pledged an oath of allegiance to the US, Obama is, in
fact, an illegal alien living in the United States.

12.He should be deported and stripped of his US citizenship and
immediately stricken from the ballot for those natural born citizens
qualified to hold the Office of the President of the United States.
13.The quickest route to obtain facts would be for this Court to direct the
Agencies of the United States to obtain the Indonesia passport for
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka, Barry Soetoro.

14.Mr. Berg has requested additional documents from Obama; however
the illegal games that this sophisticated and intelligent “master
manipulator” may engage in over the next several weeks will caUse
great turmoil to the upcoming US Presidential elections and a
constitutional crisis that may cause irreparable harm and damage to
the United States, its agencies and its US citizens, including its
registered voters who have relied upon the Federal Election
Commission and the Democratic National Committee to fully
investigate and vet its candidates before engaging in the national
disgrace of Obama, illegal alien and citizen of Indonesia being placed
on the ballot of the United States Presidential Elections of 2008.

IS.Applicant respectfully requests this Court review the solutions
available to it by commanding the pertinent agencies of the United
States as set forth in Exhibits A and B herein to take action to fully
investigate the allegations contained in Exhibits A and B herein, in
addition to the facts and documentary evidence in support of Mr.
Berg’s claims in his Complaint and Response to Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss.

16.Both the Applicant and Mr. Berg have standing as natural born
United States Citizens and registered voters to apply to the United
States District Court and the US court systems as the only avenue to
obtain relief in regards to the issues and claims of each party’s
Complaint.

17.To protect all US Citizens and registered voters, this Court is
compelled to uphold its oath to protect its US Citizens from harm,
including the name of an Indonesian citizen, an illegal alien, Barack
Hussein Obama,Jr. aka Barry Soetoro, who has diligently sought to
obtain the highest office of the United States government and its

agencies although he is not US Constitutionally qualified.

WHEREFORE, Applicant Bradley, respectfully moves this Court to enter
its Orders directed to the agencies of the United States as set forth in the
claims for relief in Counts I (pages 21-24) Count II (pages 26-29) and such
other relief as this Court deems just and necessary given the gravity of the
facts, witnesses (Grandmother, step-sister, step-brother who claim Obama
was born in Africa), and the documentary evidence in support provided by
Mr. Berg to this Honorable court to avert a US Constitutional crisis.
Further, the Applicant respectfully requests this Court utilize its power and
its authority given the gravity of the facts and documents in support of the
fact that Obama, Jr. is not US Constitutionally qualified to hold neither the
Office of the United States Senator from Illinois nor the Office of the
President of the United States as it is clear that he relinquished his US
Citizenship, if any, by becoming a citizen of Indonesia and traveling on an
Indonesian Passport from age 6-age 18, and after the age of 18. In fact,
Obama is an illegal alien attempting to fool the registered US voter in the
November 2008 Presidential elections. Applicant requests this Court to
enter its Writ of Mandamus directed to the third party agencies of the
United States to seek out, investigate and obtain third party documentary
evidence and the facts providing its report and documentary evidence to
this Court. The facts can be quickly discerned by by any and all passports
issued to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka Barry Soetoro, his biological
mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), his biological father (Barack Hussein
Obama, Sr. , and any and all public records available to this US Court or

cooperating countries and intcmLltional agencies of the world,

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of October 2008″

Second filing:

Visit Philip J Berg’s site and help hold Obama accountable:

http://obamacrimes.com

Obama indictment, Blagojevich indictment, Tony Rezko sentencing, Chicago Tribune, October 7, 2008, Prosecutors file motion, Delay sentencing indefinitely, Obama Chicago corruption

The Chicago Tribune has an article today, Tuesday, October 7, 2008,
that reveals that federal prosecutors are seeking an indefinite delay
in the sentencing of convicted criminal Tony Rezko. Rezko is a long time
close associate of Obama. Here are some exerpts from the article:

“Tony Rezko sentencing delay sought
Prosecutors’ motion says 2 sides are talking
By Jeff Coen | Chicago Tribune reporter
October 7, 2008
In the first official sign that Antoin “Tony” Rezko and his lawyers are talking with federal prosecutors about his cooperation in corruption probes, the judge in his federal fraud case has been asked to delay his sentencing this month.

In a motion filed late Monday by prosecutors, the two sides ask that the Oct. 28 sentencing date for the former fundraiser and adviser to Gov. Rod Blagojevich be delayed indefinitely.”

“Rezko would likely be the most valuable witness yet for investigators looking into state hiring irregularities and “pay-to-play” schemes involving campaign fundraising. Rezko was a key player in the Blagojevich administration from its earliest days, and the governor’s wife, Patricia, was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars as a broker for Rezko and others with business before the state.”

“At his trial, Rezko was painted as the ultimate insider who had tremendous access to the channels of power in the Blagojevich administration and as someone who used his power to leverage crooked deals to bring in kickbacks or campaign contributions. He was convicted of corrupting two state boards with the help of Stuart Levine, a member of both, who was able to secure approvals for firms seeking state business in exchange for the payment of “finder’s fees” to individuals Levine named.”

Read more here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-07-oct07,0,641472.story

Consider the following from the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator
Obama:

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has maintained regular contact
with known criminals such as Antoin (Tony) Rezko and other
criminal elements in Chicago and Illinois. Mr. Obama has
conducted business with these criminals and received campaign
donations from them. Mr. Obama was compelled to return an estimated $250,000 in donations related to Tony Rezko.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has consistently lied about his
contact with convicted criminal Tony Rezko. The Tony Rezko
corruption trial revealed that FBI mole John Thomas helped investigators
“build a record of repeat visits to the old offices of Rezko and former
business partner Daniel Mahru’s Rezmar Corp., at 853 N. Elston, by
Blagojevich and Obama during 2004 and 2005,” according to the February
10, 2008 Chicago Sun-Times.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama used the office of IL Senator to
facilitate the vote rigging in Chicago as chairman of the Illinois Senate
Health and Human Services Committee. Mr. Obama pushed legislation in Senate Bill 1332 to reduce the number of members of the Health Facilities Planning Board from 15 to 9. Mr. Obama did conspire with Stuart Levine, Tony Rezko and Rod Blogojevich to rig the committee and was rewarded with campaign contributions. The new members appointed included 3 doctors who contributed to Mr. Obama. On April 21, 2004, Stuart Levine explicitly advised Dr. Robert Weinstein, who is now indicted, of Tony Rezko’s role in manipulating the Planning Board’s vote.

Petition site:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Berg lawsuit, Berg is outraged, Obama hides behind legal issues, Obama and DNC attorney files motion, Obama Indonesian, Illegal alien, Philip J Berg statement, October 6, 2008

Philip J Berg has issued a statement in response to the motion filed on Monday, October 6, 2008 by Obama and the DNC. Here is Mr. Berg’s statement:

Berg Outraged: Obama & DNC file motion to delay discovery until after defendants motion to dismiss is decided

Berg is “Outraged” that Obama & DNC Hide Again Behind Legal Issues as their attorney files a Motion for Protective Order to “not” Answer Admissions & Production of Documents while Betraying Public in not Producing Documents proving Obama is “qualified” to be a candidate for President.

It is believed Obama is an “illegal alien”

For Immediate Release: – 10/06/08

(Contact info and pdf of press release below) 

Country is Headed to a Constitutional Crisis

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/06/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery Pending a Decision on the Motion to Dismiss (which was) filed on 09/24/08.

While legal, Berg stated he is “outraged as this is another attempt to hide the truth from the public; it is obvious that documents do not exist to prove that Obama is qualified to be President.” The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by attempting to delay the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama meets the qualifications to be President.

It is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does not meet the “qualifications” to be President of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution. Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his “Vault” [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.”

Help Philip J Berg get the truth from Obama:

http://www.obamacrimes.com

Voice your outrage here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama and DNC motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision, Obama is Indonesian, Obama is an illegal alien

Below is the text of the Obama and DNC motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision. If Obama was eligible to be president, he would prove it. This is the action of a guilty person. Obama is an Indonesian citizen and illegal alien. He should be arrested and deported.

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, :
:
Plaintiff :
:
v. : Civ. Action No. 2:08-cv-04083-RBS
:
BARACK OBAMA, et al., :
:
Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS ___ DAY OF ___________, 2008, upon consideration of the
Motion of Defendants Democratic National Committee and Senator Barack Obama for
Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision On Dispositive Motion, and of the
submissions of the parties relating thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is
GRANTED.

Surrick. J.

DMEAST #10127194 v1
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 2 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, :
:
Plaintiff :
:
v. : Civ. Action No. 2:08-cv-04083-RBS
:
BARACK OBAMA, et al., :
:
Defendants :

MOTION OF DEFENDANTS
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1), defendants Democratic National Committee
and Senator Barack Obama respectfully move the Court for a protective order staying all
discovery in this action pending the Court’s decision on defendants’ motion to dismiss
the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1), on October 6, 2008, counsel for defendants
conferred with plaintiff about agreeing to stay or defer discovery, including deferring
responses to the discovery requests already served by plaintiff (attached as Exhibit A
hereto). Plaintiff refused to consent to any such stay or deferral.

DMEAST #10127157 v1
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 3 of 10

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, accompanying this Motion is a Brief in Support of

Motion for Protective Order and a proposed Protective Order.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John P. Lavelle, Jr.

Dated: October 6, 2008
John P. Lavelle, Jr.
Attorney I.D. PA 54279
BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL,
LLP
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 864-8603
(215) 864-9125 (Fax)
lavellej@ballardspahr.com

Of counsel:

Joseph E. Sandler
General Counsel, Democratic National Committee
SANDLER, REIFF & YOUNG, P.C.
300 M Street, S.E. #1102
Washington, D.C. 20003
Telephone: (202) 479-1111
Fax: (202) 479-1115

Robert F. Bauer
General Counsel, Obama for America
PERKINS COIE
607 Fourteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-2003
Telephone: (202) 628-6600
Facsimile: (202) 434-1690

RBauer@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendants
Senator Barack Obama and
Democratic National Committee

DMEAST #10127157 v1

2
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 4 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, :
:
Plaintiff :
:
v. : Civ. Action No. 2:08-cv-04083-RBS
:
BARACK OBAMA, et al., :
:
Defendants :

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
AND DEFENDANT SENATOR BARACK OBAMA
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Defendants Democratic National Committee and Senator Barack Obama submit
this Brief in support of their Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending
Decision on Dispositive Motion. Plaintiff has served extensive discovery requests on
defendants. As noted in Defendants’ Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss, this
lawsuit is entirely without merit and plaintiffs’ allegations are patently false. Defendants
have moved to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to
state a claim. That motion presents solely issues of law; no discovery is needed in order
to resolve the motion. If the motion is granted, it will dispose of the entire action,
obviating the need for the burdensome discovery sought by plaintiff. A protective order
staying discovery is therefore warranted.

DMEAST #10127159 v1
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 5 of 10

I. Procedural Background
In his Complaint, plaintiff Berg alleges that Senator Barack Obama, the
Democratic Party’s nominee for President of the United States, is not eligible to serve as
President under Article II, section 1 of the Constitution because, Mr. Berg alleges
(falsely), Senator Obama is purportedly not a natural-born citizen. Complaint ¶3. Mr.
Berg seeks a declaratory judgment that Senator Obama is ineligible to run for President;
an injunction barring Senator Obama from running for that office; and an injunction
barring the DNC from nominating him.

On September 15, 2008, plaintiff Berg served on Senator Obama’s office a
request for production of seventeen different categories of documents, including copies of
all of the Senator’s college and law school applications, requests for financial aid, college
and law school papers, and “a copy of your entire presidential file pertaining to being
vetted.” Plaintiff also served 56 requests for admission on Senator Obama. On that same
date, plaintiff served on the DNC 27 requests for admission and requests for production
of five categories of documents, including all documents in the possession of the DNC
relating to Senator Obama.1

On September 24, 2008, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, on the grounds that, as a
matter of law, plaintiff has no standing to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for
President of the U.S. and has no federal cause of action.

True and correct copies of these discovery requests are attached as Exhibit A hereto.

DMEAST #10127159 v1

2
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 6 of 10

II. Discussion
Rule 26(c)(1) authorizes the Court to enter a protective order to protect a party
“from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” including an
order forbidding the discovery or specifying terms for discovery. “While the court should
not automatically stay discovery because a motion to dismiss has been filed, ‘a stay is
proper where the likelihood that such motion may result in a narrowing or an outright
elimination of discovery outweighs the likely harm to be produced by the delay.’” 19th
St. Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345, 349 (E.D. Pa. 2000),
quoting Weisman v. Mediq, Inc., 1955 WL 273678, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5900 *2 (E.D.
Pa. 1995). “Where a pending motion to dismiss may dispose of the entire action and
where discovery is not needed to rule on such motion, the balance generally favors
granting a motion to stay.” Weisman, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *5.

In Weisman, in which this Court found that a motion to dismiss could be decided
on the pleadings, and could be decided in a relatively short time period, the Court granted
a stay of discovery. Similarly, in Norfolk Southern Rwy Co. v. Power Source Supply,
Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15306 (W.D. Pa. 2007), defendant filed a motion to dismiss
based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction; plaintiff served interrogatories and document
requests while that motion was pending. The court granted defendant’s motion for a
protective order staying discovery, ruling that, “where, as here, an objection to the
Court’s jurisdiction made under Rule 12 might compel the dismissal of an entire action,
the Court finds that considerations of fairness and efficiency suggest the prudence of
limiting discovery to those facts necessary to resolve the motion. Because the Parties in
this matter have fully briefed the jurisdiction issue and await only the Court’s ruling,

DMEAST #10127159 v1

3
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 7 of 10

discovery in this case shall be stayed and Defendant protected from the requests that
Plaintiff has already propounded.” Id. at *4.

In this case, as in Weisman and Norfolk Southern Rwy., defendants’ pending
motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction would dispose of the entire
action. The motion does not involve any disputed issues of fact: defendants contend that,
as a matter of law, plaintiff lacks standing to challenge the qualifications of a candidate
for President and that there is no federal cause of action that could serve as a means for
such a challenge. Thus, discovery is not needed in order to rule on the motion. In these
circumstances, a stay of discovery is warranted and appropriate.

DMEAST #10127159 v1

4
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 8 of 10

CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, the Court should grant the motion of defendants
DNC and Senator Barack Obama for a protective order staying discovery pending a

decision on their motion to dismiss.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ John P. Lavelle, Jr.
Dated: October 6, 2008 John P. Lavelle, Jr.
Attorney I.D. PA 54279
BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL,
LLP
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 864-8603
(215) 864-9125 (Fax)
lavellej@ballardspahr.com
Of counsel:
Joseph E. Sandler

General Counsel, Democratic National Committee
SANDLER, REIFF & YOUNG, P.C.
300 M Street, S.E. #1102
Washington, D.C. 20003
Telephone: (202) 479-1111
Fax: (202) 479-1115

Robert F. Bauer
General Counsel, Obama for America
PERKINS COIE
607 Fourteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-2003
Telephone: (202) 628-6600
Facsimile: (202) 434-1690

RBauer@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendants
Senator Barack Obama and
Democratic National Committee

DMEAST #10127159 v1

5
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 9 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, :
:
Plaintiff :
:
v. : Civ. Action No. 2:08-cv-04083-RBS
:
BARACK OBAMA, et al., :
:
Defendants :

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 26.1(F)

Undersigned counsel for Defendants Democratic National Committee and Senator

Barack Obama hereby certifies pursuant to Local Rule 26.1(f) that the parties, after reasonable

effort, are unable to resolve the dispute that is the subject matter of Defendants’ Motion for

Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision On Dispositive Motion.

/s/ John P. Lavelle, Jr.

Dated: October 6, 2008
John P. Lavelle, Jr.
Attorney I.D. PA 54279
BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 864-8603
(215) 864-9125 (Fax)
lavellej@ballardspahr.com

DMEAST #10127199 v1
Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 10 of 10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this day, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Defendant Democratic National Committee’s and Defendant Senator Barack Obama’s
Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision on Dispositive Motion
and Brief in Support thereof was served by First Class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, upon the
following:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 09867

Plaintiff

Dated: October 6, 2008 /s/ John P. Lavelle, Jr.
John P. Lavelle, Jr.

DMEAST #10127407 v1

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama and DNC File Motion to Delay Discovery, Judge Surrick must rule, Protective order stopping all discovery, Obama is illegal alien, Indonesian

The same day that Philip J Berg filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Obama and the DNC filed a Motion to Delay Discovery until Judge Surrick rules on the prior motion to dismiss. Jeff Schreiber does a good job of explaining this. Here are some of his comments:

“It was a busy day in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania today. First, attorney Philip Berg files a motion asking the court to permit him to file an amended complaint with several additions, and then next, attorneys for Barack Obama and the DNC file a motion asking the court for a protective order, essentially asking that the judge rule on their motion to dismiss for lack of standing before ruling on Berg’s motion for expedited discovery. ”

“Basically, the law states that Judge Surrick can order discovery even in the face of a pending dispositive motion such as the motion to dismiss filed on September 24 by Obama and the DNC. In other words, he can order full discovery, limited discovery, or none at all before ruling on the dismissal. The attorneys for Obama and the DNC, however, just filed a motion asking for a protective order stopping “all discovery in this action pending the Court’s decision on defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

Just like with the amended complaint, an attorney cannot simply file a protective order but must file a motion for one, essentially asking the court to issue one. Make sense so far? That’s what this is — defense attorney John LaVelle filed such a motion this afternoon, a motion asking the judge to issue a protective order which would allow for a ruling to come down on the motion to dismiss before the commencement of any discovery.”

Mr. Berg’s comment:

“He’s asking to delay discovery and, Jeff, I’m obviously going to oppose it, ” he said. “This isn’t right. This just isn’t right. By tomorrow, we’ll have a response and put out a press release. The American people should hear about this and, if they do, they should go nuts. It’s time to put up or shut up.”

Read more from Jeff Schreiber here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Support Philip J Berg’s efforts:

http://obamacrimes.com

Voice your outrage here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama is an Indonesian and illegal alien. Otherwise he would prove his US citizenship.