Eric Zorn, Chicago Tribune, Because a Constitutional crisis is just what this nation needs right now
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
When I heard Glenn Beck insult millions of concerned Americans and military officers on his radio show, I thought that was one of the most insensitive, stupidest things I had ever heard. Is Eric Zorn related to Glenn Beck? Do they both have the stupid gene?
From Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune November 24, 2010.
“Because a Constitutional crisis is just what this nation needs right now”
“And since one must be a “natural-born citizen” to be president and Barack Obama’s father was not, as everyone acknowledges, a U.S. citizen, the whackjobs who have been unsuccessful in their “he was born in Kenya!” effort, are now hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court will help in their cause to declare him ineligible to hold office.”
On the one hand, for a micro second, I want to congratulate Zorn for mentioning the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit being before the Supreme Court. But that feeling quickly evaporates when I digest the way he dismissed those questioning Obama as being “whackjobs.” He displays a total lack of understanding about Obama’s eligibility issues and the Kerchner case.
First of all, we don’t know where in the hell Obama was born, since he has avoided presenting a legitimate birth certificate. Secondly, Zorn has got some nerve calling a retired naval commander, LTC Terry Lakin, multiple generals and millions of concerned Americans “whackjobs.”
Eric Zorn, we have a constitutional crisis now, due to people like you in the media not doing your journalistic job.
Eric Zorn, call me. Get your facts straight before making an ass out of yourself.
High ranking military questions Obama, Glenn Beck and media must follow, LTC Terry Lakin, CDR Kerchner, Generals defend US Constitution
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
LTC Terry Lakin is facing a court martial in a few weeks for disobeying illegal orders to deploy. Lt. Colonel Lakin has an obligation to disobey those orders. He takes his oath seriously.
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo have a Petition for Writ of Certiorari that went to conference in the US Supreme Court on November 23, 2010. Commander Kerchner takes his oath seriously.
I am holding Glenn Beck most accountable because of the stupid, uninformed remarks that he made on his radio show. He insulted millions of concerned Americans including high ranking military officers. I will not stand for it. I am ready to get in Beck’s face if necessary.
I am also addressing the rest of the media, including Fox. It appears that Beck, Fox and the rest of the mainstream media have made deals with one or more devils. The American public is fed up with being lied to. We will not stand for it! Regardless of what the government does to the internet, irrespective of the lies and misinformation from the media, we will get the truth out. Some of you have heard me say that if they shut me down on the internet, I and others will go on tour. A new network is not out of the question.
We must hold “news organizations” accountable. I am starting with Beck. He should know better.
This also applies to the US Supreme Court. If you believe that you cannot be removed you are wrong. We are awaiting a decision on the Supreme Court conference that reviewed the petition in Kerchner v Obama. We will hold them accountable as well.
“You are probably, like I am, you are excited to enjoy a nice big meal with your family and friends — well, at least the meal part. I don’t know, I’m always excited for people to come over for the holidays until the family actually arrives. And then you hear the doorbell and you’re like — oh, crap, they’re here.
Unfortunately, for as excited as we all may be, I’m about to rain on your parade. Yes, that’s me. I’m your little black rain cloud. I’m going to issue to a challenge to you this Thanksgiving to try to think past the stuffing, think past the turkey in your face and watching football — and try to talk to your family this year about things that really matter.”
“I am the grim reaper of apathy. That is me.”
“I want you to honestly think of this, this weekend when you are with your family, what holds this country together? Is it our values, our principles, our history? Or is it materialism?”
“So, I want to apologize in advance, but it is important. If we don’t wake up our family and friends up and we don’t start having this conversation on a weekend like Thanksgiving, unfortunately, I don’t think that they’re going to know what hit them after the holidays.”
“I know it’s not easy to talk to your families about anything — really anything. You know, our families are so divided right now and we have to try to stitch it back up. And it’s hard to talk about anything other than football and food on Thanksgiving. But when you go through the news of the day, it’s apparent that it cannot be business as usual in this country.”
I agree with what Glenn Beck is saying. Our friends and associates who are ill informed and in denial need to be awakend. Glenn Beck addresses important issues like terrorism, our economy, inflation and more government control of our lives. But isn’t that like talking about problems in Nazi Germany in 1945 and not mentioning Adolf Hitler?
I agree that Barack Obama is not the only problem, but he is a huge part of the problem and his issues go to the heart of the matter. Upholding and defending the US Constitution.
Increasingly awareness of Obama eligibility issues has spread. Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs and Sean Hannity have all asked questions about Obama’s birth certificate, natural born citizen status and eligibility. High ranking military officers, including multiple generals, have come out and questioned Obama. Major General Paul E. Vallely, retired, has asked for Obama’s resignation. LTC Terry Lakin is facing court martial for refusing illegal orders to deploy.
Kerchner v Obama, with plaintiff CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret), went to conference in the US Supreme Court on November 23, 2010. No mention anywhere by Beck.
With all of the awareness and information about Obama’s eligibility issues, one major media player, Glenn Beck, has not only not covered these stories, he has insulted millions of concerned Americans who question Obama. Beck has not covered these issues on Fox, his radio show and TheBlaze.com.
Glenn Beck stated:
“But when you go through the news of the day, it’s apparent that it cannot be business as usual in this country.”
Glenn Beck, that includes you!
If you are not going to cover the important story, or at least ask this simple question and demand an answer:
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”
If you are not going to cover this story of a lifetime, then at least
Apologize to the American people and the military.
WND EXCLUSIVE: U.S. SUPREME COURT CONFERS ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY
Conducting interviews on this topic is the Washington, D.C staff writer for WND.com, Brian Fitzpatrick.
Is president a ‘natural-born citizen’ as Constitution requires?
By Brian Fitzpatrick
(c) 2010 WND.com
WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?
The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a “natural-born citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the “Vattel theory,” which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term “natural-born citizen” to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.
“This case is unprecedented,” said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. “I believe we presented an ironclad case. We’ve shown standing, and we’ve shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There’s nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari.”
If the Supreme Court decides to grant the “writ of certiorari,” it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court’s decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.
If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the “death knell” for Obama’s legitimacy.
“Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen so it’s a death knell to his legitimacy. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else,” Apuzzo told WND.
Apuzzo observed it is “undisputed fact” that Obama’s father was a British subject.
A hearing on the merits “is also a death knell because it would allow discovery so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, and we don’t know what that would show,” according to Apuzzo. “We might not even get to the question of defining ‘natural-born citizen.’ If he was not born in the U.S., he’d be undocumented, because he’s never been naturalized. We don’t even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, but that’s hearsay. We have not seen the root documents.”
Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that discovery would sink Obama’s presidency.
“If one court had guts enough to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office,” Berg told WND. “We would ask for a lift of Obama’s ban on all of his documents. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don’t spend that kind of money unless there’s something to hide, and I believe the reason he’s hiding this is because he was not born in the United States.”
“The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case,” Berg added. “If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear a case, Obama would be out of office.”
“They’re taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens,” Berg noted.
Apuzzo is arguing the “Vattel theory,” which asserts that the term “natural-born citizen” as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work, “The Law of Nations,” was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.
According to Apuzzo, Congress and the courts have addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. However, the term “natural-born citizen” has never been altered.
“The courts and Congress have never changed the definition,” said Apuzzo. “The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him.”
Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel’s definition of “natural-born citizen” in “dicta,” or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the 1814 “Venus” case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel’s definition.
Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician and historian who used similar language to Vattel.
Previous cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have “standing” to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office.
“To me that’s false,” said Berg. “The 10th Amendment refers to ‘we the people.’ If the people can’t challenge the president’s constitutionality, that would be ridiculous.”
“My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president,” said Apuzzo. “Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients.”
Apuzzo said the founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen.
“They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody’s life, liberty and property in the process.
“They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen.”
Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh have all questioned Obama’s birth certificate, natural born citizen status and eligibility to be president. Yesterday, Rush Limbaugh stated the following on his radio show:
“The imposter got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn’t. They clearly didn’t ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We have an imposter for all intents and purposes serving in the White House.”
US Supreme Court conference, Kerchner v Obama, SCOTUS blog, Supreme Court of the United States blog, Akin Gump
As reported here this morning, Kerchner v Obama, filed by attorney Mario Apuzzo, is to be distributed for Conference by the US Supreme Court Justices, today, November 23, 2010.
A historic case, with ramifications that could shake the foundations of this country, let’s see, why would the SCOTUS blog not be interested?
From the SCOTUS Blog.
“SCOTUSblog is devoted to comprehensively covering the U.S. Supreme Court—without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards. The blog is provided as a public service and is sponsored by Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP.”
Well, you know, sometimes us pesky folks over at Citizen Wells get a little curious. And, well, I just had to know why such an important case such as this wasn’t worth mentioning. So I did a search on Akin Gump Obama contributions and discovered that these folks are real generous with their money. Akin Gump. You know, “Life is like a box of chocolates.”
“OBAMA FOR AMERICA
PO Box 8102
Chicago, Illinois 60680
FEC Committee ID #: C00431445
This report contains activity for a Primary Election
Report type: October Quarterly
This Report is an Amendment”
Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status, Obama birth certificate, Truth emerges, Kerchner v Obama, History being made
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
From Citizen Wells yesterday.
“We are poised at historical moments in this country. Tomorrow, November 23, 2010, CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo, have a Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference before the US Supreme Court. In mid December 2010, the court martial of LTC Terry Lakin will begin. LTC Lakin refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he believes that Obama is ineligible to be president and Commander in Chief.”
Today, the US Supreme is scheduled for conference regarding the Kerchner v Obama Petition for Writ of Certiorari. We are watching. With or without the US Supreme Court, the truth about Obama and his eligibility will emerge.
A great American Patriot and at the same time, average American, who has been providing information to me and this blog for over two years, one of the many concerned Americans who put the WE in CitizenWElls, sent me the following report. One person can make a difference.
From NewsFlavor November 22, 2010.
“The Ulsterman Report: Reflections on the White House Insider”
“Finally we have the portrait of a looming scandal Insider has so successfully woven throughout a number of these interviews. Is this scandal legitimate, or simply a device to send the Obama White House scurrying for cover – some form of political distraction intended to allow Insider and others within the party to ultimately develop a platform in which to launch successful opposition? “The DOJ, Washington DC, and then back to Chicago.” According to Insider, there lies the path to this president’s downfall. President Obama’s murky ties with some of Chicago’s most notorious politicos is known, though Insider might indicate not so nearly known as they should be. What of Broadway Bank? Shorebank? Tony Rezko? Rod Blagojevich? And so many other names that darken the murky past that is Barack Obama. The Obama Department of Justice is now facing far more scrutiny than when Insider initially stated that this developing scandal would begin there – with the DOJ. Is something to be found among the Black Panther voter intimidation case? Has Attorney General Eric Holder been engaged in a protective cover up of Obama’s complicity in the Rod Blagojevich pay to play scandal? And what of the “certification file” allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi? Does such a file actually exist? Was it Pelosi’s knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections? Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else? While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obama’s eligibility status as “birther” nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion. Why? If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all? Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome?. Of this I am certain – Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.
As for myself regarding the subject of the “birther” issue, I now openly admit to having “found religion” as it were. There indeed does appear to be something amiss. President Obama has spent millionshiding what most would indicate as rather basic information. Education records. Writings. Travel records. And yes, clear and comprehensive proof of birth and/or citizenship. Until recently, I was among those who discounted claims of a cover-up surrounding Barack Obama’s birth story as the silly rants of those with far too much time and resulting paranoia on their hands.
No more.
Throughout the Insider interview series, good people have come forward to offer an abundance of information that at the very least, raises the distinct possibility that a determined and ongoing cover up has in fact been underway surrounding this nation’s current president – and any time there is a cover up, there exists the resulting and required question of WHY? And so I am now left asking that very question, more often, and more loudly. I hope to be able to ask it of Insider soon.
Insider – please respond.
More work remains undone – far too many questions remain unanswered…
_________
REFERENCES:
The Ulsterman Report: Banking Scandal Lurking for Obama in 2011?
Glenn Beck is a likeable guy. I try to like Glenn Beck and I agree with him on many subjects. That does not excuse him from being held accountable.
When Glenn Beck started TheBlaze.com he stated that one of the reasons was to counteract the misinformation coming from sites like The Huffington Post. If that was his objective, he has failed.
I searched the following words on TheBlaze.com a few minutes ago.
Lakin
Kerchner
Vallely
McInerney
I got zero results on all four searches.
Of course, all four searches on Citizen Wells yield multiple results.
So Glenn Beck, what is your excuse? Are you a hypocrite, a liar? Do you support the military and the US Constitution? You have far more money and resources that I do. Glenn Beck, what is your excuse?
We are poised at historical moments in this country. Tomorrow, November 23, 2010, CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo, have a Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference before the US Supreme Court. In mid December 2010, the court martial of LTC Terry Lakin will begin. LTC Lakin refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he believes that Obama is ineligible to be president and Commander in Chief.
On August 31, 2010, Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney supplied an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin.
“For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that LTC Lakin’s request for discovery relating to the President’s birth records in Hawaii is absolutely essential to determining not merely his guilt or innocence but to reassuring all military personnel once and for all for this President whether his service as Commander in Chief is Constitutionally proper. He is the one single person in the Chain of Command that the Constitution demands proof of natural born citizenship. This determination is fundamental to our Republic, where civilian control over the military is the rule. According to our Constitution, the Commander in Chief must now, in the face of serious– and widely held– concerns that he is ineligible, either voluntarily establish his eligibility by authorizing release of his birth records or this court must authorize their discovery. The invasion of his privacy in these records is utterly trivial compared to the issues at stake here. Our military MUST have confidence their Commander in Chief lawfully holds this office and absent which confidence grievous consequences may ensue.”
“We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) — based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution.
And a call for a National Petition for new elections to select the next President of the United States of America must be initiated. We can wait no longer for a change of Power and new Government.”
Obama eligibility in Supreme Court November 23, 2010, Congressmen are you listening?, Military or court records or biased media reporting?
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
“From the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal November 17, 2010.”
“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
“My response to the following paragraph from above:
“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
The following is a factual statement:
“most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961″
Most “news organizations” did repeat that lie.
“there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
Apparently, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal is part of the conspiracy to perpetuate the lies.
Facts:
July 2009 AOL Poll: 81% say Obama should release birth certificate.
August 2009 Public Policy Polling of Virginia:
Born elsewhere 24%
Not sure 24%
July 2010 CNN Poll: Less than half were convinced of Obama US birth.
Probably born in US 29 %
Probably born elsewhere 16 %
Definitely born elsewhere 11 %
So, Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, what is your excuse for inaccurate reporting?”
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”
The following classic left wing response to my comment:
“The Answer: He hasn’t.
Get a life, birthertard”
Here is one of numerous court records that prove that the commenter and the mainstream media are liars.
From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.
Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution
From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.
For Immediate Release – 19 November 2010
Unconstitutionally, Ineligible Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html
Ineligible and Unconstitutionally Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution by: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.
History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected. http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html
Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields
Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) will be guests on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on Wednesday, 17 Nov 2010, at 9:00 p.m. EST. The subject will be the latest news about the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit and Petition filing at the U.S. Supreme Court including review of the four questions presented in the Petition. Two Justices, Sotomayer and Kagan, have been requested in the Petition to recuse themselves from this case in that they have a direct financial conflict of interest in the outcome of this case, i.e., their very appointments to the court. We have also asked the Justices in our Petition to take judicial notice of the LTC Lakin court martial in process and the Affidavit filed in that military trial by Lt General McInerney as to the impact that the uncertainty of the constitutional eligibility of Obama is having on our military whose members have all sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Recent activity in the case includes an Amicus Curiae Brief which was filed by the Western Center of Journalism in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed on 30 Sep 2010 and is now scheduled on the Supreme Court docket for discussion by the Supreme Court Justices in conference by them on 23 Nov 2010. To read the Petition see this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress
QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT:
PETITION 10-446
1. Whether petitioners sufficiently articulated a case or controversy against respondents which gives them Article III standing to make their Fifth Amendment due process and equal protection claims against them.
2. Whether putative President Obama can be an Article II “natural born Citizen” if he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and a non-United States citizen British father and under the British Nationality Act 1948 he was born a British citizen.
3. Whether putative President Obama and Congress violated petitioners’ Fifth Amendment due process rights to life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property and Ninth Amendment rights by Congress failing to assure them pursuant to the Twentieth Amendment that Obama qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen” before confirming his electoral votes and by Obama refusing to conclusively prove that he is a “natural born Citizen.”
4. Whether Congress violated petitioners’ rights under the Fifth Amendment to equal protection of their life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property by investigating and confirming the “natural born Citizen” status of presidential candidate, John McCain, but not that of presidential candidate, Barack Obama.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, see this site and help the cause with a donation: http://www.protectourliberty.org
####
Citizen WElls 