Mario Apuzzo interview, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity Lou Dobbs question Obama’s eligibility

Mario Apuzzo interview, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity Lou Dobbs question Obama’s eligibility

From  Tim Bueler, early this morning, November 24, 2010.

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
24 November 2010

CONTACT: Tim Bueler
media@timbueler.com
(530) 401-3285

WND EXCLUSIVE: U.S. SUPREME COURT CONFERS ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY

Conducting interviews on this topic is the Washington, D.C staff writer for WND.com, Brian Fitzpatrick.

Is president a ‘natural-born citizen’ as Constitution requires?

By Brian Fitzpatrick
(c) 2010 WND.com

WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a “natural-born citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the “Vattel theory,” which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term “natural-born citizen” to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

“This case is unprecedented,” said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. “I believe we presented an ironclad case. We’ve shown standing, and we’ve shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There’s nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari.”

If the Supreme Court decides to grant the “writ of certiorari,” it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court’s decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.

If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the “death knell” for Obama’s legitimacy.

“Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen so it’s a death knell to his legitimacy. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else,” Apuzzo told WND.

Apuzzo observed it is “undisputed fact” that Obama’s father was a British subject.

A hearing on the merits “is also a death knell because it would allow discovery so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, and we don’t know what that would show,” according to Apuzzo. “We might not even get to the question of defining ‘natural-born citizen.’ If he was not born in the U.S., he’d be undocumented, because he’s never been naturalized. We don’t even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, but that’s hearsay. We have not seen the root documents.”

Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that discovery would sink Obama’s presidency.

“If one court had guts enough to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office,” Berg told WND. “We would ask for a lift of Obama’s ban on all of his documents. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don’t spend that kind of money unless there’s something to hide, and I believe the reason he’s hiding this is because he was not born in the United States.”

“The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case,” Berg added. “If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear a case, Obama would be out of office.”

“They’re taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens,” Berg noted.

Apuzzo is arguing the “Vattel theory,” which asserts that the term “natural-born citizen” as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work, “The Law of Nations,” was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.

According to Apuzzo, Congress and the courts have addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. However, the term “natural-born citizen” has never been altered.

“The courts and Congress have never changed the definition,” said Apuzzo. “The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him.”

Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel’s definition of “natural-born citizen” in “dicta,” or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the 1814 “Venus” case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel’s definition.

Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician and historian who used similar language to Vattel.

Previous cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have “standing” to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office.

“To me that’s false,” said Berg. “The 10th Amendment refers to ‘we the people.’ If the people can’t challenge the president’s constitutionality, that would be ridiculous.”

“My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president,” said Apuzzo. “Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients.”

Apuzzo said the founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen.

“They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody’s life, liberty and property in the process.

“They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen.”

Link to Article: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=232073

Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh have all questioned Obama’s birth certificate, natural born citizen status and eligibility to be president. Yesterday, Rush Limbaugh stated the following on his radio show:

“The imposter got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn’t. They clearly didn’t ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We have an imposter for all intents and purposes serving in the White House.”

79 responses to “Mario Apuzzo interview, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity Lou Dobbs question Obama’s eligibility

  1. Good Morning. Excellent article! Zach

  2. It is going to be interesting to see how many “Johnny Come Lately s” are going to show up saying “I told you so” or “I always thought so”! CW is certainly deserving for most of the credit keeping this issue alive. I think we are about to be given a wonderful Thanksgiving.
    To One and All A HAPPY THANKSGIVING
    Hopefully I will be able to conclude my “USURPERVILLE DIARY” that CW has allowed me to write on this site.

  3. Good morning.
    Happy Thanksgiving.

  4. ms. helga – CW’s blog got me started covering Larry Sinclair’s allegations and the eligibility issue. He’s a Patriot with a capital P. Zach

  5. Zach – That is what got me started too. Does anyone have any info on Larry?

  6. Give thanks for the reason why this nation was founded in the first place —
    From the ‘Mayflower Compact’ — “for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith” — here from the Pilgrim Hall Museum.

    http://www.pilgrimhall.org/compact.htm

    The failure to acknowledge this is just another reason why it matters that the present occupant of the While House needs to know our history as a nation.

  7. Excellent interview.

  8. ms. helga – I have not heard directly from Larry. He is still defending the lawsuit against him. He’s on facebook. I think he’s mainly going about the business he needs to take care of. Many will be there when and if he decides to take a more public role.

  9. Twas the month before Christmas*

    *When all through
    our land,*

    *Not a Christian
    was praying*

    *Nor taking a
    stand.*

    *See the PC Police
    had taken away,*

    *The reason for
    Christmas – no one could say.*

    *The children were
    told by their schools not to sing,*

    *About Shepherds
    and Wise Men and Angels and things.*

    *It might hurt
    people’s feelings, the teachers would say*

    * December 25th is
    just a ‘ Holiday ‘.*

    *Yet the shoppers
    were ready with cash, checks and credit*

    *Pushing folks
    down to the floor just to get it!*

    *CDs from Madonna,
    an X BOX, an I-pod*

    *Something was
    changing, something quite odd! *

    *Retailers
    promoted Ramadan and Kwanzaa*

    *In hopes to sell
    books by Franken & Fonda.*

    *As Targets were
    hanging their trees upside down*

    * At Lowe’s the
    word Christmas – was no where to be found.*

    *At K-Mart and
    Staples and Penny’s and Sears*

    *You won’t hear
    the word Christmas; it won’t touch your ears.*

    *Inclusive,
    sensitive, Di-ver-si-ty*

    *Are words that
    were used to intimidate me.*

    *Now Daschle, Now
    Darden, Now Sharpton, Wolf Blitzen*

    *On Boxer, on
    Rather, on Kerry, on Clinton !*

    *At the top of the
    Senate, there arose such a clatter*

    *To eliminate
    Jesus, in all public matter.*

    *And we spoke not
    a word, as they took away our faith*

    * Forbidden to
    speak of salvation and grace*

    *The true Gift of
    Christmas was exchanged and discarded*

    *The reason for the season, stopped before
    it started.*

    *So as you
    celebrate ‘Winter Break’ under your ‘Dream Tree’*

    *Sipping your
    Starbucks, listen to me.*

    *Choose your words
    carefully, choose what you say*

    *Shout MERRY CHRISTMAS ,
    not Happy Holiday !

    Please, all Christians join together and wish everyone you
    meet during the holidays a MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!

    Christ is The
    Reason for the Christ-mas Season!

  10. That was sent to me by a retire friend and Vet, thought I would share it with you.

  11. Sir William,
    God Bless You!Loved it!

  12. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30286

    DHS & TSA: Making a list, checking it twice

    By Doug Hagmann Tuesday, November 23, 2010

    Following the publication of my article titled “Gate Rape of America,” I was contacted by a source within the DHS who is troubled by the terminology and content of an internal memo reportedly issued yesterday at the hand of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Indeed, both the terminology and content contained in the document are troubling. The dissemination of the document itself is restricted by virtue of its classification, which prohibits any manner of public release. While the document cannot be posted or published, the more salient points are revealed here.

  13. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2632364/posts

    It’s Official–The FCC Will Vote to Take Over the Internet in December
    Big Government ^ | November 23, 2010 | Seton Motley

    Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 7:58:44 AM by PJ-Comix

    Just this past Friday, we warned you that a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) December Internet power grab was probably coming.

    Well, we now know that it is – and it may be even worse than we thought.

    Details have been sketchy, and successive reports often contradictory, but what follows is what seems to be looming over us in December. (We will know for sure on Wednesday, November 24 – if the FCC maintains its current December 15 meeting date.)

    FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski appears to be preparing to dramatically increase the FCC’s regulatory role over the Internet (in TWO ways; more on that later).

    He is doing so without the necessary Congressional authority – which he himself acknowledges he doesn’t have. And he is doing so by torturing and twisting the regulatory language he is drafting – so as to keep this extraordinary dictatorial seizure within the current Title I confines.

  14. The memo leaves no doubt as to who, exactly, is leading the charge to label Americans who refuse current security measures due to health and privacy concerns as extremists. “The measures to be taken in response to the negative public backlash as detailed [in this directive], have the full support of the President,” it says.

  15. With respect to OPT OUT, I would think that it will generate a LOT OF LOVE……PATS from our GUARDIANS at the AIRPORTS.

  16. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2632398/posts

    DHS & TSA: Making a list, checking it twice
    Canada Free Press ^ | November 23, 2010 | Doug Hagmann

    Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:03:44 AM by Natural Born 54

    The terminology contained within the reported memo is indeed troubling. It labels any person who “interferes” with TSA airport security screening procedure protocol and operations by actively objecting to the established screening process, “including but not limited to the anticipated national opt-out day” as a “domestic extremist.” The label is then broadened to include “any person, group or alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel disruptions at U.S. airports in response to the enhanced security procedures.

  17. Bob | November 24, 2010 at 8:22 am |

    The failure to acknowledge this is just another reason why it matters that the present occupant of the While House needs to know our history as a nation.
    **********************************************
    Bob, That is why the Constitution requires the president to be a natural born Citizen, so that person as a member of our society, will grow up and learn the history, and the customs of America.

    Obama, is a fraud, he doesn’t need to learn our history, it is not his history, he is not a natural born Citizen of the United States, and he doesn’t give a damn about our history, unless he needs a quote for a speech, from Abe Lincoln. Obama needs to quit pretending he is president, and slither away, back to the shadows of the communist party, where ever it is they hide between election seasons.

  18. TODAY WE CELEBRATE AND GIVE THANKS FOR THE THINGS THAT WE HOLD DEAREST TO OUR HEARTS,AND WE THANK OUR CREATOR FOR PROVIDING THESE THINGS.
    I WISH EVERYONE A WARM,AND HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

  19. After much scrutiny, document experts have proclaimed that Obama’s COLB posted on the internet is a fake. But the glaring evidence that something is fishy can be seen without the benefit of forensic evidence. It has to do with the horizontal folds in the paper, are lack thereof.

    A freeper recently posted photos of her Hawaii birth certificate and COLB at Free Republic. Danae’s COLB clearly reveals the folds in her document.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2606951/posts?page=1545#1545

    Obama’s COLB was first posted at his very own website, Fight the Smears. Notice that there are no folds in the document.
    http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

    But they mysteriously appear later in the factcheck.org COLB
    http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

    The HDOH folds a COLB in a precise manner before it is placed in an envelope for mailing to the requestor. Obviouslly, these photos are not of the same document. One or both COLBs are fakes. Now why would Obama provide a fake COLB if he had a real one? The Hawaii DOH has never stated that the fightthesmears or factcheck COLBs were issued by their department.

  20. Bob Strauss……………………………
    The one glaring factor demonstrated thus far by Soetoro is his EXTREMELY obvious lACK OF KNOWLEDGE of even an ELEMENTARY LEVEL of the history of our REPUBLIC. This alone tells me that he is NOT A PRODUCT OF THE US,and it is likely that he ISN”T EVEN a LEGAL CITIZEN either.

  21. Holder/DOJ and Gitmo terrorists..
    boy, that Eric Holder sure is clever…
    When he can’t get the terrorists charges dropped as their defense attorney (or folks in the same firm)… he gets them dropped as the prosecutor (DOJ taking case to civilian court)..

    The terrorists have a real friend in Eric Holder!

    I guess that the best defense (attorney), is a prosecutor (on your side)!

  22. I’m taking the liberty to bring over the last part of SueK’s post from the prior thread (12:23AM), because it ties in with Free Speech’s 9:12AM post on this thread:
    “…..Here’s what I think is happening: a la Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, the gub’mint pushes the public a bit then, pushes some more. Eventually, the population reaches a breaking point and what we saw with Mr. Christina from CT (punching the TSA moron in the gut) becomes commonplace. Civil unrest will happen when the population is pushed and pushed, and their freedoms eroded. That’s when ‘they’ step in with their strong arm tactics and perhaps even declare martial law to finish off their agenda. Barky and his puppetmasters’ agenda, that is.

    The American people are obviously not buying into it all, so the travesties escalate. Chip, chip, chip away at the American psyche is the plan, I think.

    Sorry this all sounds so morbid, but it’s all going according to the plan. It must be stopped, by whatever means possible. Let’s face it, if we were presented with the circumstances and abuses that are happening today oh, let’s say, 20 years ago, we might think we were in a third world country run by a dictator. Are we that far away from that right now? Do we listen to one of the bestest ’80′s hair bands, Rainbow, who sang ‘Can’t Happen Here’ and scratch our heads? Can it happen here? We’re witnessing it.

    It’s coming down. It must be stopped. NOW.”

  23. Muzzies/TSA/ Airport Security

    To date, the TSA has not stopped ONE terrorist!

    They would do better to place their scanning machines at the doors of mosques… catch a lot more terrorists and leave granny and 3 year olds alone.

    Before anyone starts crying about religious freedom (which I think is very important)…

    It helps if you view Islam as a theocracy or a political system and not a religion. It is a political system spanning many countries which has declared war on the USA many times. They have admitted that their mosques are armories.

    The scans have nothing to do with security. The scans are the muzzies way of showing their dominance and power over the US people through their muzzie/arab pResident.

    Time to wake up! Read Muslim Mafia – get the traitors out of our government while we still can…

  24. The terrorists have a real friend in Eric Holder!

    I guess that the best defense (attorney), is a prosecutor (on your side)!
    *********************************
    Holder represented terrorists from Gitmo before he became Attorney General. He’s probably still “working off” the original retainer. By the time Obama, and Holder get done playing legal games the whole lot of them will be set free.

  25. bob strauss | November 24, 2010 at 10:10 am |

    “Obama needs to quit pretending he is president, and slither away, back to the shadows of the communist party, where ever it is they hide between election seasons.”
    __________________________________________________

    This should be the USURPER’S theme song –

  26. Free Speech | November 24, 2010 at 10:07 am |
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2632398/posts

    DHS & TSA: Making a list, checking it twice
    Canada Free Press ^ | November 23, 2010 | Doug Hagmann
    **************************************
    Thanks for posting that link, FS. Now we are apparently seeing the “acting out” of what SueK has alluded to (as well as others here).
    Here is a synopsis:
    “Any person, group or domestic alternative media source that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports…….” Such will be reported as “domestic extremists” Clearly, Obama has signed off on all of this. The identities of such extremists will be electronically reported to the intelligence division of DHS.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Folks, that could be construed to be anyone complaining on the internet, such as WND and other news sources, and, if fine-tuned, any posters. Wow!
    A quick response by the public has prompted the same from HLS. This is exactly what the gub’mint is planning on doing, if you agree with SueK’s essay, and I most certainly do!

  27. oldsalt79 | November 24, 2010 at 10:23 am |

    Bob Strauss……………………………
    The one glaring factor demonstrated thus far by Soetoro is his EXTREMELY obvious lACK OF KNOWLEDGE of even an ELEMENTARY LEVEL of the history of our REPUBLIC. This alone tells me that he is NOT A PRODUCT OF THE US,and it is likely that he ISN”T EVEN a LEGAL CITIZEN either.
    *********************************************************
    Remember 57 states? The exact number of Islamic states. Go figure.

  28. SirWilliam | November 24, 2010 at 8:46 am |
    Twas the month before Christmas*
    ****************************
    Excellent poem, Sir William! Sadly, it is so true. Thanks for sharing it.

  29. CHECK THIS OUT !

    Vet, 77, Busted For Obama Death ThreatWanted to shoot president for “what he has done to this country”

    NOVEMBER 24–A 77-year-old South Carolina man whose home was stocked with an arsenal of guns told Secret Service agents that he wanted to shoot Barack Obama “for what he has done to this country,” according to a criminal complaint charging him with threatening the president’s life.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/stupid/vet-77-busted-obama-death-threat

    ps

    HAPPY THANKS TO ALL HERE

  30. Bob @ 2:11 am | From prior post. Thank you for your comments re: financial systems-I always had a problem trying to grasp those concepts–all the guys I ever worked with seemed to “get it” right away, much of it eludes me still. I remember one of my bosses being so upset years ago re: the Japanese and dumping. Your comments re: Russia reminded me of something I saw on 60 Minutes years ago. It was right after the fall of the USSR-and there was this huge complex that went down many floors. In it were diamonds-all sorted, graded and ready to go, but they couldn’t/wouldn’t sell them something to the effect if they did diamonds world wide would drop to pennies-because the value of diamonds is artificially set the DeBeers Consortium I think. Maybe part of this has to do with the old adage re: putting all of your eggs in one basket-the housing bubble, tulip bubble etc.

  31. Does anyone feel safer because persons with disabilities or medical devices or small children go through “pat downs” … or persons go through the full body scanner that can only show hard objects (not soft materials)?

    Since so many who should be profiled get through without either method being applied to them it appears to be just a waste of money.

    I believe yesterday that Rush implied that the whole reasoning behind all of this is to force people into the scanners, force airlines out of business so gov. can then take them over and form more unions. And now scanners planned for trains, etc. too?

  32. Bob | November 24, 2010 at 8:22 am |
    Give thanks for the reason why this nation was founded in the first place –
    From the ‘Mayflower Compact’ — “for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith” — here from the Pilgrim Hall Museum.
    ******************************************
    Oh, yes!!!, Bob. I so agree! BTW, thanks again for your input re. the worldwide impact of currency valuations and market fluctuations. Economics is a broad field with many differing opinions; that is why I don’t believe everything I read from so-called “experts”, who many times either have an agenda or who are not well-rounded in their understanding of the broad scope of monetary matters.

  33. TJ | November 24, 2010 at 10:23 am |
    Holder/DOJ and Gitmo terrorists..
    boy, that Eric Holder sure is clever…
    When he can’t get the terrorists charges dropped as their defense attorney (or folks in the same firm)… he gets them dropped as the prosecutor (DOJ taking case to civilian court)..
    **********************************
    Yeah, and then the administration has the gall to say that the outcome was a success!?! ” If you’re going to tell a lie, make it big enough and the whole world will believe it.” Wasn’t it Hitler who said something like that?

  34. Free Speech @ 9:56 am |
    One of the many problems I’m having with the TSA v/s WE THE PEOPLE is some people know their Constitutional rights and are asking (they shouldn’t have to) have their rights respected. In no way should they be treated as not a team player to keep the lines moving etc. This reminds me so much of the Civil Rights movement that we were in when we were kids. Now the entire country is having their civil rights violated (willingly/unwillingly). Worse I keep reading a Muslim in a bur qua does not have to go thru this (male, female under a veil who knows) you could hide a Sherman Tank under that flowing garb. AZ border still wide open so the safety rap is beyond laughable.

  35. Someone posted this thread at Free Republic.

    Apuzzo, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Limbaugh, Hannity, Dobbs question Obama eligibility
    CITIZEN WELLS NEWS ^ | Citizen Wells
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2632449/posts

  36. “Investigation: Obama likely not eligible ”

    “An investigation by the authors found that according to correspondence from the original framers of the Constitution as well as multiple Supreme Court rulings and the legal writings that helped establish the principles of the Constitution, Obama is not eligible to serve as president since his father was not a U.S. citizen.

    The authors concluded Obama may not be eligible regardless of his place of birth. The book recommends further legislative and judicial debate.”

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=232213

  37. CW, you have been in the vanguard when it comes to Obama’s ineligibility, and we are so grateful for your research and comprehension of the seriousness of this matter.

    In fact, that is how I found your blog. I had just learned to use the computer and googled in something like “Obama’s eligibility”, which led me to Citizen Wells. I know there are others out there who also share in this passion, but you have done it as thoroughly as anyone, imho.

    Another thought: A couple of threads back your lead-in essay had to do with the Ulsterman/Insider reports, and I couldn’t help but reflect back on the Watergate era when Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, did investigative research for the WaPo. What we are facing now makes Watergate look like a little kids’ picnic. Where are the real, investigative journalists that have a public platform?

    It has come to the point that the truth is having to be ferreted out by people undercover – not one, but many. Regardless of whether Ulsterman is projecting his own observations and thinking in the “Insider” figure, or Insider is a real, live person; the truth is that voices within the Democratic Party are beginning to be heard a little at a time through Hannity, Rush, etc.
    The truth will come out eventually.

    Ponder a couple of verses from Isaiah:
    “In transgressing and lying against the Lord, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.
    And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.” (Isa. 59: 13-14)

    “truth is fallen in the street…”

  38. Frankly, it will be much much more difficult (and they’d be subject to harsh rebuke) for the Supreme Court to justify NOT finding a case with standing than FINDING standing — so I am cautiously optomistic — but then again, maybe corruption (and/or intimidation) has overwhelmed all levels of all branches of Govt.

  39. All the references re: eligibility blood/soil got me thinking about blood-a building block of life, building block of our Constitutional Republic. WE THE PEOPLE are having a hemolytic reaction-it is that inate.
    jus sanguinis and jus soli
    Matching a donor’s blood and a patient’s blood is critical in transfusions. If someone with type A blood receives type B, he may have a severe hemolytic reaction. This can destroy many of his red cells and quickly kill him. While blood-typing and cross matching are now routine, errors do occur. Every year people die of hemolytic reactions.
    Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_would_happen_if_you_were_to_have_a_blood_transfusion_and_you_were_given_the_wrong_blood_type#ixzz16DZKVxqj

  40. A USURPER of the POTUS office cannot legally invoke ANYTHING………even MARTIAL LAW.

  41. Cabby – AZ @ 11:24 am |
    “the truth is that voices within the Democratic Party are beginning to be heard a little at a time through Hannity, Rush, etc.”
    Cabby-after the installation of Obama via the DNC in 08, at least half or more Dems left the party to PUMA, Independent and Tea Party. This must and should come through the Democrat Party who have lost all credibility, honor, dignity well they have lost it all for this pos from Chicago’s cesspool of corruption. I hope they stupidly don’t think he was worth it. I believe in our two party system-if justice is served and the Democrat Party goes the way of all flesh-the Tea Party and the people are ready to replace them with loyal Americans. Hillbuzz and many other former Democrat organizations are actively pursuing this.

  42. Mr. Clean……………………………..
    While “WANTING” to harm someone could be seen as a THREAT, IT IS NOT the PERPETRATION of a crime,or for that matter even against the laws of most states. It is the expression of FREE SPEECH,AND THOUGHT.Simply saying that he would like to harm someone does NOT RISE to the level of a PROSECUTABLE FELONY OFFENSE.

  43. More about TSA and their concern re: safety.
    http://hillbuzz.org/2010/11/24/sick-woman-singled-out-for-tsa-groping-because-agents-wanted-to-touch-her-breasts/
    http://www.clickorlando.com/news/25902334/detail.html
    Janet Napolitano has given the TSA unprecented ability to touch the public’s private areas (except for Muslims who are immune from searches, even though they are the ones who blow up airplanes).
    TSA agents are sexual, human beings.
    Some members of the public are very attractive.
    TSA agents can pick which members of the public get extensive searches.
    Are records kept as to which people certain TSA agents grope and fondle, specifically?
    Because it sounds like these people are selecting women and men they WANT to grope, instead of people who are actual terror threats (that would be Muslims, who are not being profiled or groped).
    I can’t imagine Jake Gyllenhaal or Zac Efron making it through an airport ever again without every TSA agent on duty manhandling their junk.
    Not that either of them would seem to complain all that much.

  44. So much for privacy issues.
    http://hillbuzz.org/2010/11/24/sick-woman-singled-out-for-tsa-groping-because-agents-wanted-to-touch-her-breasts/#comments
    November 24, 2010 at 11:32 am
    cotchie1967 Says:
    Sarah Palin was on Glenn Beck’s radio show this morning and she was asked if she flew commercial what option would she take – body scan or pat down. She said pat down with no hesitation. She said if she were to submit to a body scan it would be all over the internet by the end of the day.

  45. Michelle – Isn’t it something that we have come to this: Sarah Palin said, “pat down” with no hesitation, because a body scan would be all over the internet…
    Did you ever in this wide world think it would come to THIS? So soon?
    We are on the fast track to something very bad, if this behavior cannot be stopped.

  46. Michelle | November 24, 2010 at 11:05 am | Free Speech @ 9:56 am |
    One of the many problems I’m having with the TSA v/s WE THE PEOPLE is some people know their Constitutional rights and are asking (they shouldn’t have to) have their rights respected. In no way should they be treated as not a team player to keep the lines moving etc. This reminds me so much of the Civil Rights movement that we were in when we were kids. Now the entire country is having their civil rights violated (willingly/unwillingly). Worse I keep reading a Muslim in a bur qua does not have to go thru this (male, female under a veil who knows) you could hide a Sherman Tank under that flowing garb. AZ border still wide open so the safety rap is beyond laughable.

    —————————–

    You are correct and it has been documented that at some airports the muslim “women” are not being checked at all. They are allowed to pass thru security with their “husbands” showing their passports without even pulling the veil back to see if it is indeed a “woman” under the veil.

  47. Today I say a prayer for the following:
    1. Those in harms way, the middle east and Korea, are kept safe.
    2. This Constitutional Republic gets a functional SCOTUS that hears an eligibility case and makes a decision.
    3. Lt. Col. Lakin, gets discover so that he can properly defend himself for asking if he was following an illegal order.
    4. That pay-to-play and union kickbacks become extinct.
    5. Christians remember to hear Christ words, and listen, as we near his birthday.

    Pete

  48. Coming up: TSA body scanners on public transportation
    http://hotair.com/archives/2010/11/24/coming-up-tsa-body-scanners-on-public-transportation/ ^

    Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:59:57 AM by chessplayer

    Jazz has a list of reasons why he doesn’t object to the body scanners. Now it looks like we’ll be getting scanners all over the place, including public transportation, trains and boats. Janet Napolitano:

    “I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?”

  49. Big Government is attempting to turn America into a police country on all fronts: the following from The 912 project

    It’s Official – FCC To Vote to Take Over the Internet in DecemberPosted by Jared Law on November 24, 2010 at 8:08am in Activism/Events

    Yesterday Andrew Brietbart’s Big Government published a blog post by Seton Motley, a consultant and the president of Less Government, an organization dedicated to, well, less government. Including protecting the First Amendment from governmental assault. Seton is also the Editor in Chief of StopNetRegulation.org, a Center for Individual Freedom production.

    In his blog post, Mr. Motley confirms what we discussed here on The 9.12 Project Network back on November 20th.

    The radical leftist Obama Regime will attempt to do a hostile government takeover of the Internet in America.

    I doubt they’ll refrain from using it until 2013.

    We MUST stop this attempt to rob us of our 1st Amendment Rights!!

    ——–

    It’s Official – The FCC Will Vote to Take Over the Internet in Dece…by Seton Motley

    Just this past Friday, we warned you that a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) December Internet power grab was probably coming.

    Well, we now know that it is – and it may be even worse than we thought.

    Details have been sketchy, and successive reports often contradictory, but what follows is what seems to be looming over us in December. (We will know for sure on Wednesday, November 24 – if the FCC maintains its current December 15 meeting date.)

    FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski appears to be preparing to dramatically increase the FCC’s regulatory role over the Internet (in TWO ways; more on that later).

    He is doing so without the necessary Congressional authority – which he himself acknowledges he doesn’t have. And he is doing so by torturing and twisting the regulatory language he is drafting – so as to keep this extraordinary dictatorial seizure within the current Title I confines.

    The latter is for The Chairman merely an optical effort. If he can feign the appearance of remaining within Title I, he avoids Reclassification to Title II – against which many of us have long been rightly fighting. He will then portray his fealty to Title I as testament to the alleged “moderation” of his (un)modest proposal.

    This will be a totally bogus assertion, but he will make it – and the media will inparrot-esque fashion repeat it. The Chairman should bring crackers to the press conference.

    Free Press and the Media Marxists – who have long cried for Title II Reclassification – will on cue rail against The Chairman’s “sell-out.” This will further “bolster” his claim that he has found the magical, mystical Third Way – winding a path between the leftist Open Internet absolutists and the evil telecom companies.

    The Chairman should also bring nuts to the press conference – in case Free Press & Co. show up.

    (An aside: How are the telecom companies “evil” – when they have invested hundreds of dollars in building the Internet infrastructure? Which has resulted in the free speech, free market Web Xanadu we consumers all currently enjoy. Free Press and the Media Marxists haven’t invested a dime – yet they somehow successfully lay claim to the mantle of “consumer advocates.”)

    Of course, this attempted sleight of regulatory hand does not get The Chairman past one glaring problem – the D.C. Circuit Court has already unanimously ruled that the FCC doesn’t have the authority to regulate the Internet under Title I – at least as far as enforcing Network Neutrality is concerned. (Which is why Free Press & Co. have been clamoring for Title II Reclassification.)

    And Net Neutrality is why The Chairman has engaged in – and forced us all to endure- this one year-plus kabuki dance. Testimonium – The Chairman now looks poised to have the FCC again attempt to enforce Net Neutrality – under his now stretched-beyond-all-recognition Title I. What a short, selective memory he has.

    And most economically destructive of all – it appears The Chairman will try to impose Net Neutrality not just on wired broadband Internet service – but on wireless “smart phones” as well.

    This would be a titanic overreach by The Chairman – and an immense blow to the economy. The uncertainty caused just by The Chairman’s prolonged flirtation with the Media Marxists and their ridiculous Internet notions has already cost us billions of dollars in private sector Web investment.

    The cost in investment dollars and jobs lost when Net Neutrality is actually imposed will be cataclysmic.

    These aren’t the fake “saved or created” jobs of the alleged “stimulus” – these are very real jobs denied or destroyed by the ridiculous and ridiculously damaging Net Neutrality. Imposed by an FCC and its Chairman who know in advance that they do not have the authority to do so.

    What will follow will be years of litigation forced upon us by The Chairman – to undo what he knew beforehand he didn’t have the authority to do.

    What will follow will be years of diminished and diminishing Web capacity, caused by an absurd policy wrongfully jammed down our throats by a dictatorial, rogue Executive Branch Commission.

    What will follow will be years of stagnant or declining job growth, as investment capital rightly flees a regulation-constricted Internet which is no longer amenable to free market success.

    What will follow this essay may very well determine the free market, free speech future of the Internet – are you ready to place some calls and send some emails and faxes to protest this preposterous policy proposal and demand that it never be enacted?

    Stay tuned – we will soon tell you how you can be a part of the preventative solution.

    ——–

  50. If somebody acts upon the words or thoughts of another person,by perpetrating a felony based upon those words or thoughts, the perpetrator ALONE is the only chargeable,or prosecutable person. WE HAVE THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION,GUARANTEED BY OUR CONSTITUTION. It is the same as if he/she acted out the writings of somebody’s book. Perhaps we should consider prosecuting some 17th century author who is long dead. This smacks of the sort of INSANE LAW PRACTICE that HOLDER practices,along with his criminal perpetrator FRIENDS.

  51. Pete……………………….
    I personally think that however the SCOTUS rules it will GREATLY effect Lakin’s trial. Should the SCOTUS rule favorably then the MILITARY judge can be FORCED to allow LAKIN to use his Soetoro eligibility as a defense. The SCOTUS could indeed set a PRECEDENT. However I don’t think that they will allow anything to move forward with regard to Kerchner either. They have to know that if they do then they are trapped. If they deny Kerchner then you also know that they are COMPLICIT.

  52. Free Speech | November 24, 2010 at 12:16 pm |
    Coming up: TSA body scanners on public transportation
    *******************************
    Yes, and already there is at least one in a courthouse in Colorado. Don’t be surprised if they appear in U.S. post offices and other federal buildings. We are being “conditioned”.

  53. Thanks for the info. stay safe, God Bless.

  54. Michelle……………………….
    There is a UNIVERSAL blood type that can be used in urgent surgical situations,and/or transfusions. where whole blood is required. It is TYPE “O”.

  55. Reviewing what Obama said during the annual Turkey Pardon, he choose an interesting noun, “shellacking” to describe such an event.

    What is interesting, at least to me, is why he choose such a word to describe the pardon of a Turkey? Shellacking means, flogging, Whipping, beating….

    Although the Media is claiming this is Obama reference to the recent elections and not the Turkey pardon, I just wonder if President Bush would have been criticized and labeled a “racist” and accused of approving the use of the noun for past Slavery era.

    There are in fact proper use of the noun, I just don’t believe it has a place with a Turkey pardon.

    Maybe just me.

  56. USA Patriots shout………………………………
    Chavez openly bragged that it wasn’t until he had absolute control over ALL avenues of communication, that he was able to completely control the public, and their LIVES as well. Chavez makes Castro seem like a school child. He is an extremely dangerous person. Eventually there will be a substantial bounty on Chavez head, put there by some of his own people, and I wouldn’t be afraid to bet that there will be a lot of takers.

  57. Free Speech-I have another question re: TSA v/s WE THE PEOPLE. What if a police officer and/or a Judge in his robes did this exact same stuff to a person either gender? wouldn’t under color of law enter into this equation? why does a TSA uniform negate the Bill of Rights and our Constitution? What reminded me of this was something VERY GROSS that happened in Chicago years ago. Women were arrested for minor infractions (speeding as little as 10 miles over the limit) taken back to the department and stripped search, while some of the officers were entertained due to looking through a peep hole. I think this went on for years, many women complained but got nowhere. One night they got the wrong woman-ticket, strip searched same rotten treatment. She went home and read her husband the riot act-he was a Judge-it was a huge scandal in Chicago at the time and it ended due to the Judge’s wife who just flipped out. If I remember correctly many officers (if you can use that word) fired, many demoted.

  58. oldsalt79 | November 24, 2010 at 1:00 pm |

    ******************************************

    OldSalt,

    I agree with you mostly. However, the Kerchner case is testing the SCOTUS on “Standing” for Mario’s Plaintiffs. I do not think that any result of this case will have any bearing on LTC. Lakin’s case “IF” LTC. Lakin’s case hits SCOTUS, as they will be different, in my opinion.

    First, lets hope and pray that Commander Charles Kerchner and Mario are successful with standing at the SCOTUS. But, if LTC. Lakin’s case reaches SCOTUS, it will mean that he is in prison, therefore his ‘Injury” is very unique in standing, quite different than anyone else or any other case at that point in time.

    just my opinion of the differences at SCOTUS with the 2 cases. One will be in prison with injury in fact and very specific and difficult for SCOTUS to deny that as standing.

    Let’s hope it doesn’t have to go that far.

  59. China, Russia quit dollar
    http://tinyurl.com/2ur7wlc

  60. From A Previous Thread:

    REGARDING: The 100% Illegal & 100% Unconstitutional Violations & Molestations Of The Out Of Control USA Federal Government Using The
    TSA – Homeland Security – On Peaceful American Citizen’s Eternal Forever Living God-given Inalienable, Forever Living Civil Rights, Freedoms, & Liberties:

    From: http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/obamas-refusal-to-acknowledge

    Excerpt From: “Obama’s Refusal To Acknowledge Threat Of Radical Islam”

    “Will the Illegal Search and Seizure of Legal [American] Citizens at airports be the First Test of this [Illegal] Administration as to whether Americans will complacently surrender their constitutional rights? What’s next?”

    # # # #

    From: http://www.CitizenWells.wordpress.com

    USAPatriots-Shout!! said:

    “I believe that TSA searches are not to protect us but to test us to see how much more abuse Americans will suffer before they stop turning the other cheek. I suspect what this regime really wants is for us to rebel with violence to give them the excuse to turn their private armies against us.”

    # # # #

    From: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/22/are-obama%e2%80%99s-perversions-becoming-even-more-pronounced/#comments

    “Kristin says:
    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM

    I say:

    Everybody buy a hijab and cover their faces. Then let those TSA agents try to figure out what to do.”

    # # # #

  61. “TAKE THIS FUN TERRORISM QUIZ”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/09/18/take-this-fun-quiz/
    * * * * * * * * * * * *
    “INSANITY! FULL BODY SCANNERS EXEMPT MUSLIMS!”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/full-body-scanners-exempt-muslims/
    * * * * * * * * * * * *

  62. “ARE MUSLIMS EXEMPT FROM FULL BODY SCANNERS??”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/are-muslims-exempt-from-full-body-scanners/
    * * * * * * * * * * * *
    “MUSLIMS EXEMPTED FROM PORN SCANNERS & PAT DOWNS”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/11/19/muslims-exempted-from-porn-scanners-pat-downs/
    * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  63. “FOLLOW THE MONEY ON FULL-BODY SCANNERS”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/11/19/follow-the-money-on-full-body-scanners/
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    “THE FINAL SOLUTION”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-final-solution/
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  64. “THE DIRTY 19: SENATORS WHO VOTED TO CENSOR INTERNET”
    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/the-dirty-19-senators-who-voted-to-censor-internet/
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    AN EXCELLENT COMMENT FROM:

    “Kristin says:
    Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM

    I say:
    Everybody buy a hijab and cover their faces. Then let those TSA agents try to figure out what to do.”

    # # # #

    “*NEW* OFFICIAL “HOMEGROWN JIHAD” TRAILER”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPu7iVLSyX8

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  65. In disgraceful acts to help those who violate U.S. law, federal legislators in different parts of the country have blocked the deportation of illegal immigrants in the last few days.

    The three federal lawmakers from California and Ohio, all Democrats, claim to be acting on behalf of the illegal aliens because they were brought into the U.S. as children by their undocumented parents. Therefore, the thinking goes, they should not be punished for something they had no control over.
    http://tinyurl.com/3afhneh

  66. Starla @ 1:51 pm |
    If the government of the United States of America defend our Constitutional rights half as well as CAIR has for the Muslims we would not even be having these discussions. Obviously CAIR, their rights and sharia law trump our Constitutional protections. Is our government also trying to say that the only people who have modesty issues are Muslims-not our fellow Americans that may be Roman Catholic, Protestant, Buddhist, atheist etc? I include both genders in this.
    “CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down”

  67. NBC Honors Ground Zero Mosque Developer as a ‘Person of the Year’
    http://tinyurl.com/2fhwea9

  68. Ten Things You Need To Know About S.3827, The DREAM Act
    http://tinyurl.com/2dxxkqw

  69. AN EXCELLENT COMMENT

    “EricR says:
    Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM

    From: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/23/the-rise-of-freedom-isnt-new-buildings-in-new-york/#comments

    “On Monday the course we follow to restore constitutional government will be set. The final branch of government will weigh in on whether the Constitution of the United States of America will stand as the power of We the People to restrain government and hold it accountable or it is now government which will decide if and when it will be restrained or held accountable. Liberty or tyranny, it is that simple.”

    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/washington-times-kerchner-et-al-v-obama_21.html

  70. Recently I asked if TSA was unionized. I have since learned that they do not have a separate union YET, but look at this:

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/40318901/ns/travel-news/

    (excerpt)
    The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the union that represents TSA workers, is urging the TSA to do more to protect its employees from abuse from airline passengers angry over the new security methods.
    (snip)
    The National Treasury Employees Union, which also represents TSA workers, has launched a campaign to educate the public about the critical role played by TSA officers in helping secure the safety of air travel.
    (snip)
    Valyria Lewis, local president of AFGE Local 555, which represents TSA screeners in Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina, said TSOs are trained to screen passengers who opt out of full-body scans.
    *********************************
    It sounds as though TSA agents are WELL represented by UNIONS. That is another factor to be considered in this debacle.

  71. “Full Court Press–on the Press”
    ©2010 drkate

    “The controlled opposition media, after two plus years of dancing around and avoiding the ineligibility of Barack Obama for the White House, finally let it slip yesterday that “we have an impostor serving in the White House“.”

    http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/full-court-press-on-the-press/

  72. i have never heard sean hannity voice any question about obamas eligibility. he is a wimp and coward who is a puppet of rupert murdoch and fox news. plus he is there for the money first. he is just an armchair patriot.

  73. AN EXCELLENT COMMENT
    From: http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/unacceptable-risk/#comments

    “Jan said: November 21, 2010 at 4:45 am

    Flloyd Brown-Impeach Obama has a series of 5 YouTube videos by Pastor Perry Stone about Islamic Prophecies. I had never heard of Pastor Stone. In these videos he compares our calendar with the Islamic calendar, the Christian Religion with Islam and the symbols that obama uses are explained fully.

    Please take the time to watch the videos. He explains so many things about Islam and obama. Each tape is about 15-minutes, so allow yourself time.
    I would really appreciate some feed back from those that watch these.”

    http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-do-islamic-prophecies-point-to-obama/?utm_source=Floyd+Reports&utm_campaign=61efdba065-FR_11_21_201011_21_2010&utm_medium=email

    # # # #

    Perry Stone mentions Barack Obama in the third & fourth videos.

  74. Dr Jerome Corsi Exposes Cancer Risks From TSA Full Body Scanners

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s