Category Archives: Barry Soetoro

Obama born in Kenya, Berg has evidence, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama’s grandmother tape, Grandson born in Kenya, Supreme Court appeal, US Constitution upheld

From African Website 2008

From African Website 2008

Citizen Wells received information from reliable sources earlier in
2008 that stated Obama was born in Kenya and that a Kenyan birth
certificate existed for Obama. Philip J Berg has a tape Of Obama’s
paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, stating she was present at Obama’s
birth in Kenya. Here is Berg’s comment:

“While the evidence presented by Berg was largely circumstantial, the attorney says that he is learning more about this narrative–and about the Democratic Party nominee for president–with each passing day. For example, regardless of whether it could be attached to the proceeding as it goes through the appellate process, Berg said, he is in possession of a native-language audiotape of Sarah Obama, Barack Obama’s paternal grandmother, stating on the day of the last presidential debate that her famous grandson was indeed born in Kenya, and that she was present in the hospital for his birth.

“The tape is in the native language there,” Berg said. “I will release it as soon as translation is confirmed by affidavit, and we are waiting on affidavits from contacts over here and in Kenya.””

Read more here: 
http://www.americasright.com/

Help Philip J Berg uphold the Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Obama not eligible to be president, US Constitution, Obama born in Kenya, Obama is Indonesian, Secretary of State, Board of elections, Electors, Accountable, Uphold Constitution, Citizen Wells to American public

“Our Constitution is in actual operation; everything appears to promise
that it will last; but nothing in this world is certain but death and
taxes.”

Benjamin Franklin

“A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high
duties of a good (officer), but it is not the highest. The laws of
necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger,
are of higher obligation.”

Thomas Jefferson

“The ballot is stronger than the bullet.”

Abraham Lincoln

Up to this point, the political parties and the individual states have been in control of the election process. The state boards of elections, in conjunction  with the major political parties have controlled which candidates will be on the ballots. However, the US Constitution still rules and just beneath that the Federal election laws rule. The states have control over their respective elections and electors, but are still governed by federal law.

Several weeks ago, Citizen Wells contacted the NC State Board of Elections.
After a brief phone call dominated by the Board of Elections staff member,
Citizen Wells was told that they had been aware of the Philip J Berg
lawsuit for several months and that they took their cue from the
Democratic Party regarding Obama’s eligibility. Once again, the US
Constitution rules and we will hold the NC State Board of Elections
accountable.

Once the individual state electors meet on December 15, 2008, the Federal
Government takes control of the process. Lawsuits in courts require
the burden of proof on the part of the plaintiff. This burden is not necessary
for those charged with upholding and defending the Constitution.
Consider the following:

Both John McCain and Barack Obama are US Senators. When they took office they spoke the following pledge:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW

“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):”

“§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

Pennsylvania Law

“§ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

NC Law

“At the first meeting held after new appointments are made, the members of the State Board of Elections shall take the following oath:

“I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, and that I will well and truly execute the duties of the office of member of the State Board of Elections according to the best of my knowledge and ability, according to law, so help me, God.””
“§ 163-114.  Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring after nomination and before election.

If any person nominated as a candidate of a political party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary) dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the following instructions:
Position

President 

Vacancy is to be filled by appointment of national executive
committee of political party in which vacancy occurs”

This is not a situation where Obama is on trial and the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.

The government of the US has not filed a lawsuit with the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff.

Barack Obama is running for the office of president of the US, This is no different than applying for any other job involving competition.
As in any other situation involving a job application, the burden of
proof regarding qualification to hold office, falls on Obama. The
rules are spelled out in the US Constitution. The preponderance of
evidence reveals that Obama was born in Kenya, became an Indonesian
citizen and is in fact an illegal alien. Those who choose to ignore
these facts and allow Obama to proceed are violating the law and
will be held accountable.

Regardless of how the Philip J Berg lawsuit plays out, the US Constitution
must be upheld. Many people involved in the election process are
charged with upholding the US Constitution and will be held accountable.
This article will be emailed to the Secretary of State in each state
after a phone call to explain that the citizens are watching them. The
individual electors will also be held accountable. The Citizen Wells
blog will also create an accountability page for each state and will
provide feedback on how each state cooperates with the letter and spirit
of the Constitution.

I urge all of you to contact your Secretary of State and Board of Elections
in your state. Let them know you do not want an illegal alien on the
ballot or voted for by state electors. While you are at it, let them
know that voter fraud will not be tolerated. Let us know about the level
of concern and cooperation in your state.

The Philip J Berg lawsuit Timeline can be accessed at the top of this blog.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Berg appealing to US Supreme Court, October 25, 2008, Obama not qualified to be president, Standing challenged

Philip J Berg is appealing his lawsuit dismissal to the US Supreme Court. Here is Mr. Berg’s news release:

“Press Release: Berg v. Obama dismissed – Berg appealing to U. S. Supreme Court
Saturday, 25 October 2008 16:51 administrator Main – News    Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

For Immediate Release: – 10/25/08 – Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It’s a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

# # #

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it”

Read more here:

http://obamacrimes.com

Judge Surrick Dismisses Berg lawsuit, Philip J Berg, Jeff Schreiber analysis

Judge Surrick dismissed the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is Indonesian and not eligible to be president. Jeff Schreiber has provided some information on Judge Surrick’s ruling:

“Saturday, October 25, 2008
Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
 
The order came down at approximately 6:15 p.m. on Friday. Philip Berg’s lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States had been dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lacked standing.

Surrick, it seemed, was not satisfied with the nature of evidence provided by Berg to support his allegations.
Various accounts, details and ambiguities from Obama’s childhood form the basis of Plaintiff’s allegation that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States. To support his contention, Plaintiff cites sources as varied as the Rainbow Edition News Letter … and the television news tabloid Inside Edition. These sources and others lead Plaintiff to conclude that Obama is either a citizen of his father’s native Kenya, by birth there or through operation of U.S. law; or that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia by relinquishing his prior citizenship (American or Kenyan) when he moved there with his mother in 1967. Either way, in Plaintiff’s opinion, Obama does not have the requisite qualifications for the Presidency that the Natural Born Citizen Clause mandates. The Amended Complaint alleges that Obama has actively covered up this information and that the other named Defendants are complicit in Obama’s cover-up.”

 

“So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.

If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”

 

“Berg’s attempts to distinguish his own case from Hollander were deemed by Judge Surrick to be “[h]is most reasonable arguments,” but his arguments citing statutory authority were said by the judge to be a venture “into the unreasonable” and were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.” All in all, the judge wrote, it was the satisfaction of the injury-in-fact requirement which was the problem. Berg’s harm was simply too intangible.

…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election.

Berg, disappointed by the decision, plans to appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and then to the United States Supreme Court.

“This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution,” Berg said. “If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States–the most powerful man in the entire world–is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?””

Read more here:

http://www.americasright.com/

The Constitution must be upheld.

Citizen Wells will post an article in the next 48 hours with an action plan.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Judge Surrick dismissed, October 24, 2008 ruling, Philadelphia Daily News

The Philadelphia Daily News has stated that Judge Surrick has ruled on the Philip J Berg Lawsuit. Judge Surrick allegedly ruled on the lawsuit last night, October 24, 2008. I have it on authority that the writer of the article, Michael Hinkelman, is a “rabid Obama supporter.” Mr Hinkelman does indeed publish gross inaccuracies (lies where I come from) about the case. The informed reader will immediately spot them.

Go ahead and read the biased account from the Philadelphia Daily News, the same newspaper that did not touch this story until the case was dismissed, and then read a more factual, authoritative account here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Here are some exerpts from the article:

“Posted on Sat, Oct. 25, 2008
Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News

hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.”

Read more here:

http://www.philly.com/dailynews

Here are Citizen Wells’ thoughts on the ruling:

  • The US Constitution rules. Judge Surrick is bound to uphold the Constitution.
  • Thousands of voters were disenfranchised during the Democratic Primaries.
  • Thousands more voters will be disenfranchised if Obama is allowed to remain on the ballot.
  • As the election progresses, control of the election process will shift from the states to the Federal Government. The following officials will be bound to uphold the Constitution:
  1. Secretary of State of each state.
  2. Election Board Officials.
  3. Electors.
  4. Governors.
  5. Judges.
  • All of the above officials will be held accountable.
  • Taking a cue from the Democratic Party will not be a valid excuse for not upholding the Constitution and allowing Obama, an illegal alien, to remain on the ballot or be voted for by electors.

Philip J Berg will appeal Judge Surrick’s decision and take the case to the Supreme Court if necessary. The Citizen Wells blog will produce an article soon to help clarify how the Constitution must be upheld. In conjunction with the American public, we will hold all responsible for the election, accountable.

Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Andy Martin, New York, News conference, October 24, 2008, Obama investigation, Hawaii birth certificate, NBC News, Colin Powell, Tom Brokaw

Andy Martin is in New York, back from his investigation of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Here is the latest release from Martin:

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
 
INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN LANDS IN NEW YORK TO PLAN NEW STRATEGY FOR DEALING WITH BARACK OBAMA, COLIN POWELL AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA
 
INTERNET POWER BEGINS TO DRIVE THE “TWO ELECTIONS OF 2008”
 
ANDY SAYS NBC NEWS’ TREATMENT OF COLIN POWELL IS EVIDENCE OF “TWO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS” IN 2008
 
(NEW YORK)(October 24, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin has landed in New York and will hold a news conference Friday afternoon, October 24th (today) to disclose plans for the final week of his efforts to “tell the truth about Barack Obama.” Martin is the author of “Obama: The Man behind The Mask.”
 
“When we conceived our investigative trip to Hawai’i last month, no media or writers had been to Hawai’i to dig into the truth about ‘the hidden Obama’ or his secret ‘birth certificate’ that no one has ever seen. Now everyone is buying tickets to Honolulu, even my competing authors, see http://wnd.com/index.php?fa= PAGE.view&pageId=78954. We have given Hawai’i tourism a boost. We have started a ‘rush to land’ in Hawai’i.
 
“Every Barack Obama showed up in Honolulu, looking for his ‘true’ birth certificate. Will wonders never cease?
 
“The very fact that we promoted a pioneering investigation of Obama’s past in Hawai’i, and that others are now following our lead, confirms that we have created the Internet powerhouse of
2008.
 
“But the hour is late; today we announce our general plans for the final days of the campaign to tell the truth about Senator Obama.
 
“I would be remiss if I also did not express my extreme dismay at the mainstream media’s latest act of malpractice,  ‘Republican’ Quisling Colin Powell’s appearance on NBC.
 
“The Powell affair explains a great deal about media reality in 2008. We have two presidential election campaigns being conducted simultaneously: one by the mainstream media to force feed us Barack Obama, and one on the internet where truth generally prevails, with notable exceptions, and where Obama is not our uncrowned king.
 
“What has become increasingly apparent to me is that a vast segment of the electorate has completely tuned out traditional media and has come to rely exclusively on Internet powerhouses such as ContrarianCommentary.com. Advertisers be warned.
 
“When you see turncoat and racial huckster Colin Powell being given an uncritical platform on NBC news to stab his ‘friend’ John McCain in the back, you know why the American people have tuned out the broadcast media and stopped turning to the print media. Tom Brokaw has morphed from a respected journalist into an Obama whore.
 
“The Republican Party made Colin Powell and promoted him to the highest offices in the land. How did he repay Republicans? By stabbing the party in the back. Fortunately for me, I was never a member of the ‘cult’ of Colin Powell. I always saw through him as the ass kisser and mediocre military man he was.
 
“Had Powell previously made any of his criticisms known in speeches to party leaders, or at party functions? Not a word. He just waited until the last minute, when Obama appears to be leading, to start ass kissing and start looking for a new job to burnish his tarnished reputation.
 
“Did Brokaw press Powell with probing questions? Not on your life. They were two lovers on Meet The Press. Powell went on national television and smeared the party with an unfiltered attack on John McCain.
 
“Ironically, I tend to agree with some of Powell’s observations. But both parties are being run by their extremist wings: right-wing Republicans and left-wing Democrats.
 
“It is the manner of Powell’s betrayal, and NBC News’ function as a megaphone for Obama propaganda, that I find despicable. The presentation of Powell’s message uncritically and without probing demolishes NBC’s credibility. Going on TV to trash the party that made him is a true indicator of what a sycophant and brownnoser Powell always was. That Tom Brokaw would allow this ‘news’ charade to be presented under his name shows why people no longer trust and no longer believe and no longer are turning to the mainstream media for election information.
 
“Where was Powell’s backbone when he could have helped stop the Iraq war by forcefully speaking out? I am a Republican and I marched in the streets of Washington and New York to protest the imminent attacks. But Powell was more concerned with ‘polishing’ his legacy than with being a true leader in 2003. Now he is groveling to Barack Obama at the eleventh hour, hoping to snare a few crumbs from the Democrats. I would like to see Obama lose just to keep Powell out of office. Powell is despicable.
 
“Instead of challenging Powell’s perfidiousness, the mainstream media have been parroting and promoting him. No wonder people tune out this propaganda. Powell is the mainstream media’s designated Republican backstabber. He had jelly in his spine in Viet-Nam; he had jelly in his spine in 1991. He lied to the American people in 2003, and now he is groveling to Barack Obama and looking for a new handout at the highest levels of government.
 
“I give Powell a ‘Bronx cheer’ in honor of his birthplace. Powell and his megaphones in the mainstream media are the reason there are two election campaigns being conducted, one on the Internet where truth is the goal, and one in the mainstream media where liberal lies are the currency,” Martin will state.
 
NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:
 
WHO:     
 
National anti-Obama leader and Obama Author Andy Martin   
 
WHAT:    
 
National anti-Obama leader Andy Martin announces plans for the final week of the anti-Obama movement
WHERE:
 
909 Third Avenue, public sidewalk in front of FDR Station, New York 
           
WHEN: Friday, October 24, 6:00 P. M.
 
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329
 
TO PURCHASE BOOK: Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies from http://www.OrangeStatePress.com
 
ANDY E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com”

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Greta Van Sustern, Birth Certificate, Berg lawsuit, Media coverage, Rush Limbaugh, Greta

Finally we have coverage of the Philip J Berg lawsuit by major media players. Rush Limbaugh has mentioned the lawsuit and now Greta Van Sustern has a proposal to address the birth certificate issue. The Zach Jones blog has an article about Greta’s proposal:

“Friday, October 24, 2008
Greta Van Susteren is Breaking Media Silence about Berg v Obama
This morning Greta Van Susteren opened a small crack in the media silence concerning the Berg v Obama lawsuit. Greta made the suggestion that all four candidates submit valid birth certificates to help prove they meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President of The United States. I agree that this would be a great first step. However, Sen. Obama also needs to address the other allegations raised in Berg v Obama.

Here is Greta’s Post:

OK … the internet rumors about the birth certificate: let’s end the rumors and the viral nature of them!
by Greta Van Susteren
Of course I know about all the internet gossip about Senator Obama’s birth. Many of you (thousands?) have written me saying he was not born in the USA ( a Constitutional requirement for President) …. the rumors are flying around the internet and overloading my inbox and is viral. It doesn’t stop! I have thought the emails a waste of keyboard time and have ignored them.

However, since the emails just won’t stop…and since it really is a topic that should be put to rest and can be done with such ease, I now think Senator Obama should release his birth certificate but I also think, to be fair, so should the other 3….yes, all 4.

So, let’s have it! All 4 need to release their birth certificates to prove each was born in the USA and thus constitutionally able to serve as President. Let’s insist that all 4 release birth certificates and put the matter to rest! (and yes, stop the emails to me!)

Until this is done, the rumors simply will not stop and rumors are not fair…it is not fair to Senator Obama and he also should not be blackmailed into producing the records…so, if all 4 must produce, that seems fair.

Let’s see them….and then let’s move on.

END of Greta’s Post

I want to suggest that everyone post Greta’s suggestion everywhere to get people to flood Greta’s site and let her know just how many Berg supporter’s are out there.”

Read more here:

http://zachjonesishome.blogspot.com/2008/10/greta-van-susteren-is-breaking-media.html

Judge Surrick ruling, Philip J Berg lawsuit, October 24, 2008, US Constitution, Obama ineligible to be president, Middle East, Libya, Kenya, Obama threat to US, Uphold Constitution

Judge Surrick will provide a ruling any minute on the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Barack Obama is Indonesian and ineligible to be president. Lawsuit outcomes are hinged on very tight legal wordings and the burden of
proof placed on the plaintiff. Regardless of legal wrangling in court,
regardless of the ruling by Judge Surrick, the US Constitution must be upheld and those charged with upholding the US Constitution must do so and be held accountable. This includes Barack Obama.

Here is what we know:

  • The DNC did not vet Obama.
  • The MSM has supported Obama and not vetted him.
  • Obama has documented long time close ties to corruption in Chicago, Illinois and the Middle East.
  • Obama has close ties to Dubious connections in the Middle East and
    Africa. Three people close to Obama, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan and Raila Odinga, have visited Libya.
  • Obama traveled to Pakistan when he was young when travel to Pakistan by US citizens was restricted.
  • Obama was born in Kenya.
  • Obama was adopted by his stepfather, Soetoro, became an Indonesian
    citizen and studied the Koran.
  • Obama and the Obama camp stole the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton using voter fraud and illegal campaign donations.
  • Obama has lied about most aspects of his life and past associations,
    including, but not limited to, his socialist party connections and Acorn involvement.

With the exception of the Kennedy assasination, Citizen Wells has never
been much of a conspiracy theorist. However, given the body of evidence,
I am inclined to believe that there is a Middle Eastern, radical Muslim,
connection to Obama, perhaps Libyan, that intends to destroy the US
from within. Too many events and associations have come into focus
to ignore this possibility.

Barack Obama, regardless of his many dubious connections, is not eligible
to be POTUS. Irrespective of any lawsuits in court, the US Constitution
must be upheld. Citizen Wells and the American public will hold all
accountable. Citizen Wells will provide an article soon that will
provide insight into upholding the US Constitution.

Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Andy Martin, Hawaii, Obama not Barack Obama, FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS father, OBAMA’S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE, INCOMPLETE OR TAMPERED WITH

From Andy Martin in Hawaii:

“ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
ContrarianCommentary.com
 
“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
 
 
“OPERATION ALOHA OBAMA” YIELDS UP THE TRUTH ABOUT BARACK OBAMA
 
PART THREE: BARACK OBAMA IS NOT BARACK OBAMA
 
“OBAMA’S FATHER WAS FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS. OBAMA IS REALLY FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS, JR.,” SAYS ANDY MARTIN
 
OBAMA’S ‘DREAMS FROM [HIS] FATHER] WAS REALLY A BOOK ABOUT HIS REAL FATHER, FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS
 
OBAMA WAS THE VICTIM OF A HISTORICAL ANOMALY, AND ROBBED OF HIS BIRTHRIGHT AS THE SCION OF CIVIL RIGHTS ROYALTY
 
OBAMA’S ORIGINAL “VAULT” BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS EITHER INCOMPLETE OR TAMPERED WITH, WHICH IS WHY IT HAS NEVER SURFACED.
 
MARTIN SAYS OBAMA SHOULD SUBMIT TO DNA TESTING WITH HIS BROTHERS
 
WAS OBAMA THE “VICTIM” OF A PRO-LIFE MOTHER?
 
(HONOLULU, HI)(October 22, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin told a Honolulu news conference today that after an intense international investigation he is convinced that Barack Obama, Junior, the presidential candidate is really the son of Obama’s controversial mentor Frank Marshall Davis.
 
“Mendacious adults ‘switched’ Obama at birth. That is why he has refused to allow access to the original or ‘vault’ birth certificate,” Martin told a Honolulu news conference. “We believe the original certificate did not list a father. Barack Obama became the father as a result of an agreement between Ann Dunham, Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama, Sr.
 
“Davis was already married to a White Woman. He did not need a nonmarital child by a second one. Ann probably refused to have what was then called a ‘back alley’ abortion. Davis may have felt that ‘Obama’ would face less stigma with an ‘African’ background than a Negro one. The civil rights revolution, of course, turned that gambit upside down. In discovering and understanding what happened we cannot forget we are dealing with events in 1961, not 2008.
 
“The irony in all of this is that Obama once stated he did not want his daughters to be ‘victimized’ with a child. And he is alive because his mother took the contrary view.
 
“Barack Obama has known this since adulthood, and the shock of this discovery still reverberates in his psyche.
 
“Ironically, what I have to say today dilutes the ‘Muslim’ theory that has propagated. Davis was not a Muslim. If Obama had told the truth at some point in his life, instead of living endlessly with the lies that were imposed on him by the adults in his life, we would have avoided a great deal of confusion. I, for one, have deep compassion for Mr. Obama. He is not the first person in history to be caught up in this kind of family fraud.
 
“The disclosure by the two women in his life that he was not the ‘son’ of his ‘father’ also explains why he manifests such extreme ambivalence to both his mother and grandmother. He is angry because he was cheated of his real father.
 
“Obama was robbed of his birthright of being the son of civil rights royalty, and of a father with whom he was completely simpatico. He could have grown up the son of Frank Marshall Davis, civil rights pioneer and activist, cutting-edge journalist, poet and man of letters. Mr. Davis was an extraordinary man in a dark period of this nation’s history, the pre-dawn of the civil rights era.
 
“Obama has probably suspended his campaign and is flying to Honolulu because he is deathly afraid his grandmother may make a ‘dying declaration’ and blow the whistle on his family fraud. Dying people often blurt out the truth. The true facts of Obama’s parentage also reflect why there has been so much tension and alienation, as well as genuine love, in Obama’s relationship with his grandmother.
 
“There has been a great deal of confusion and misconception about Frank Marshall Davis. A brief history lesson is essential to understanding the bizarre facts of Obama’s provenance.
 
“During the 1920’s and 30’s many Negros (African-Americans) became ‘communists’ because the Soviet Union and the Communist Party USA promised to end racial segregation and Jim Crow laws in the United States. The Democratic Party, of course, was the powerful force behind segregation and Jim Crow. So it is a twist of fate that the same party that oppressed Blacks has now nominated one for president.
 
“Madelyn Dunham is the last surviving person who knows the truth about the switch. That is why as we closed in on Dunham, Obama went ballistic, cancelled his campaign and came to Hawai’i to head us off.
 
“I actually carry an official, certified pocket-sized birth certificate on me at all times [Andy shows a copy to media]. But this is NOT my ‘birth certificate.’ The original certificate is held in the City Clerk’s vault in Middletown, Connecticut. That is what has come to be known as the ‘vault copy.’
 
“Likewise, the document that Obama has plastered over the Internet is NOT his original birth certificate or even a copy of his original certificate. It is a computer generated facsimile of an official record and nothing more. The original certificate was either handwritten or typewritten, not computer-generated in 1961. No one has ever seen that original certificate except the people that are working so hard to keep it hidden from the American people.
 
“I am asking Judge Ayabe to impound the value certificate and have the court hold it for safekeeping.
 
“By the time Barack Obama learned who he was, it was too late to change his identity. He was who he was, so he continued the ruse of being the son of an ‘African herder,’ which was yet another lie. ‘Dreams From My Father’ bears no connection to dreams from Barack Obama; there were none. It was Frank Marshall Davis who communicated his dreams to his secret son.
 
“There is a simple way for Obama to resolve this controversy: he can either admit the truth of these facts and order the immediate release of his vault certificate; or he can submit to a DNA test. We can conduct a Maury Povich-style DNA test to determine filiation between Obama and his brothers, one of whom blogs at BarackObama.com.
 
“In closing, I can only say that we used the fictional ‘Hawai’i Five-O’ as our dramatic template for this investigative operation. We could have as easily used the great, real-life Hawai’i detective Chang Apana as our polestar. He was featured in yesterday’s newspaper.
 
“As for Mr. Obama, all I can say is ‘Book’em Danno.” Case solved. Barack Obama the presidential candidate is the son of Frank Marshall Davis.” Martin stated.
 
“I bear Mr. Obama no ill will and no animus. I have only been a faithful servant of the search for truth, and I believe we finally know the secret truths about who Barack Obama really is: the son of Frank Marshall Davis.””

Obama removal, Obama not eligible, Obama Indonesian, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Andy Martin investigation, Hawaii Supreme Court, US Constitution, Logan Act, Jerome Corsi, Obama removed soon

The burden of proof in court cases can be very difficult to achieve.
Philip J Berg has a lawsuit filed August 21, 2008 that states that Obama
is a citizen of Indonesia and not eligible to be president. The lawsuit
is alive, has entered a new phase and according to Mr. Berg, will be
taken to the US Supreme Court if necessary. Up until now, Obama has
not been vetted by the DNC or the MSM. However, the truth about the
real Obama is slowly emerging. The DNC and state election boards have
been in control of the election process. Citizen Wells contacted the
NC Board of elections and discovered that they were aware of the Berg
lawsuit and stated that they got their cues from the DNC. However, there
is a watermark of vetting that is in place and supersedes state law and
election traditions. The US Constitution. As we work our way through the
election process, the US Constitution and Federal Election Laws will
factor more in the determination of eligibility.

There are several “show stoppers” in the limelight today regarding Barack
Obama, his eligibility, judgement and associations. Here are some of the
prominent controversies:

  • The Philip J Berg lawsuit states that Obama is Indonesian and not eligible to be president. A reliable source just indicated a ruling is imminent. According to Jeff Schreiber, “Because Barack Obama and the DNC failed to answer or object to his request for admissions within the mandatory 30-day period, Berg says, the admissions are admitted by default”
  • Andy Martin, a journalist, writer and investigator, has been in Hawaii
    for several days and has filed a request with the Hawaii Supreme Court to access Obama’s birth records.
  • Obama is traveling to Hawaii, allegedly because of his Grandmother’s
    health. However, due to Obama’s consistent pattern of deception and
    lies, coupled with the Berg lawsuit and Martin investigation, many are
    questioning Obama’s motives.
  • Jerome Corsi, author of “ObamaNation”, was in Kenya recently and deported by the Kenyan government. Mr Corsi returned with new evidence of the agenda of Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga and the ODM party and Obama’s meddling in Kenyan affairs. Obama was criticized by the Kenyan government for his 2006 trip to Kenya.
  • New revelations surface each day of Obama’s strong ties to William Ayers, a domestic terrorist, and Acorn, which is currently embroiled in voter fraud investigations in numerous states.
  • Tony Rezko is talking and all the people indicted as a result of the Rezko trial and investigations have connections to Obama. FBI mole. John Thomas, refuted Obama’s earlier claims that he did not have much contact with rezko.
  • Obama was not vetted by the DNC or MSM. However, as the election proceeds, various participants in the process will be held to the standard of upholding the Constitution. The Citizen Wells blog will provide more on this in the coming days.

So, which of these controversies and events will put an end to the deception
by Obama and the DNC. The collective wisdom of the founding fathers
impresses me more than ever. Will the safeguards put in place many years
save this country. If we follow their lead, the country will survive.

Support Philip J Berg and the US Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org