Monthly Archives: November 2010

George W. Bush, The real man, The real president, Bruce Vincent, Natural born citizen

George W. Bush, The real man, The real president, Bruce Vincent, Natural born citizen

It is the day before Thanksgiving, a holiday proclaimed by one of our greatest presidents, Abraham Lincoln. It is fitting, in these tumultuous times, that the truth about another president, George W. Bush, be presented. It is a refreshing reminder of what a real president is. One we are certain was eligible, a natural born citizen.

The following is, by all accounts, an accurate portrayal of Bruce Vincent’s encounter with President Bush.

“Story by: Bruce Vincent

For those of us who sometimes find ourselves having doubts about our former President, here is an excellent piece — worth every minute it takes to read it.  This story is from Bruce Vincent of  Libby  ,  Montana  who had gone to the White House with others to receive an award from the President.
He writes:
I’ve written the following narrative to chronicle the day of the award ceremony in DC.  I’m still working on a press release but the White House press corps has yet to provide a photo to go with it.  When the photo comes I’ll ship it out.  When you get done reading this you’ll understand the dilemma I face in telling this story beyond my circle of close friends.

Stepping into the Oval Office, each of us was introduced to the President and Mrs. Bush.  We shook hands and participated in small talk.  When the President was told that we were from  Libby  ,  Montana  , I reminded him that Marc Racicot is our native son and the President offered his warm thoughts about Governor Racicot.
I have to tell you, I was blown away by two things upon entering the office.  First, the Oval Office sense of ‘place’ is unreal.  The President later shared a story of Russian President Putin entering the room prepared to tackle the President in a tough negotiation and upon entering, the atheist muttered his first words to the President and they were “Oh, my God.”

I concurred. I could feel the history in my bones.  Second, the man that inhabits the office engaged me with a firm handshake and a look that can only be described as penetrating. Warm, alive, fully engaged, disarmingly penetrating. I was admittedly concerned about meeting the man. I think all of us have an inner hope that the most powerful man in our country is worthy of the responsibility and authority that we  bestow upon them through our vote.
I admit that part of me was afraid that I would be let down by the moment — that the person and the place could not meet the lofty expectations of my fantasy world. This says nothing about my esteem for President Bush but just my practical realization that reality may not match my ‘dream.’

Once inside the office, President Bush got right down to business and, standing in front of his desk, handed out the awards one at a time while posing for photos with the winners and Mrs. Bush. With the mission accomplished, the President and Mrs. Bush relaxed and initiated a lengthy, informal conversation about a number of things with our entire small group. He and the First Lady talked about such things as the rug in the offi ce. It is traditionally designed by the First Lady to make a statement about the President, and Mrs.Bush chose a brilliant yellow sunburst pattern to reflect ‘hope.’  President Bush talked about the absolute need to believe that with hard work and faith in God there is every reason to start each day in the Oval Office with hope. He and the First Lady were asked about the impact of the Presidency on their marriage and, with an arm casually wrapped around Laura, he said that he thought the place may be hard on weak marriages but that it had the ability to make strong marriages even stronger and that he was blessed with a strong one.

After about 30 or 35 minutes, it was time to go. By then we were all relaxed and I felt as if I had just had an excellent visit with a friend. The President and First Lady made one more pass down the line of awardees, shaking hands and offering congratulations. When the President shook my hand I said, “Thank you Mr. President and God bless you and your family.”  He was already in motion to the next person in line, but he stopped abruptly turned fully back to me, gave me a piercing look, renewed the vigor of his handshake and said, “Thank you — and God bless you and yours as well.”

On our way out of the office we were to leave by the glass doors on the west side of the office. I was the last person in the exit line. As I shook his hand one final time, President Bush said, “I’ll be sure to tell Marc hello and give him your regards.”

I then did something that surprised even me. I said to him, “Mr. President, I know you are a busy man and your time is precious. I al so know you to be a man of strong faith and I have a favor to ask of you.”

As he shook my hand he looked me in the eye and said, “Just name it.” I told him that my step-Mom was at that moment in a hospital in  Kalispell , Montana , having a tumor removed from her skull and it would mean a great deal to me if he would consider adding her to his prayers that day. He grabbed me by the arm and took me back toward his desk as he said, “So that’s it. I could tell that something is weighing heavy on your heart today. I could see it in your eyes.This explains it.”

From the top drawer of his desk he retrieved a pen and a note card with his seal on it and asked, “How do you spell her name?” He then jotted a note to her while discussing the importance of family and the strength of prayer. When he handed me the card, he asked about the surgery and the prognosis. I told him we were hoping that it is not a recurrence of an earlier cancer and that, if it is, they can get it all with this surgery.

He said, “If it’s okay with you, we’ll take care of the prayer right now. Would you pray with me?” I told him yes and he turned to the staff that remained in the office and hand motioned the folks to step back or leave. He said, “Bruce and I would like some private time for a prayer.”

As they left he turned back to me and took my hands in his. I was prepared to do a traditional prayer stance — standing with each other with heads bowed. Instead, he reached for my head with his right hand and pulling gently forward, he placed my head on his shoulder.  With his left arm on my mid-back, he pulled me to him in a prayerful embrace.

He started to pray softly. I started to cry. He continued his prayer for Loretta and for God’s perfect will to be done. I cried some more. My bod y shook a bit as I cried and he just held tighter. He closed by asking God’s blessing on Loretta and the family during the coming months. I stepped away from our embrace, wiped my eyes, swiped at the tears I’d left on his shoulder, and looked into the eyes of our president. I thanked him as best I could and told him that me and my family would continue praying for him and his.

As I write this account down and reflect upon what it means, I have to tell you that all I really know is that his simple act left me humbled and believing. I so hoped that the man I thought him to be was the man that he is. I know that our nation needs a man such as this in the Oval Office. George W. Bush is the real deal. I’ve read Internet stories about the President praying with troops in hospitals and other such uplifting accounts. Each time I read them I hoped them to be true and not an Internet perpetuated myth. This one, I know to be true. I was there. He is real. He has a pile of incredible stuff on his plate each day — and yet he is tuned in so well to the here and now that he ‘sensed’ something heavy on my heart. He took time out of his life to care, to share, and to seek God’s blessing for my family in a simple man-to-man, father-to-father, son-to-son, husband-to-husband, Christian- to-Christian prayerful embrace. He’s not what I had hoped he would be. He is, in fact, so very, very much more.”

Mario Apuzzo interview, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity Lou Dobbs question Obama’s eligibility

Mario Apuzzo interview, Supreme Court confers Kerchner v Obama, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity Lou Dobbs question Obama’s eligibility

From  Tim Bueler, early this morning, November 24, 2010.

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
24 November 2010

CONTACT: Tim Bueler
media@timbueler.com
(530) 401-3285

WND EXCLUSIVE: U.S. SUPREME COURT CONFERS ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY

Conducting interviews on this topic is the Washington, D.C staff writer for WND.com, Brian Fitzpatrick.

Is president a ‘natural-born citizen’ as Constitution requires?

By Brian Fitzpatrick
(c) 2010 WND.com

WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a “natural-born citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the “Vattel theory,” which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term “natural-born citizen” to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

“This case is unprecedented,” said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. “I believe we presented an ironclad case. We’ve shown standing, and we’ve shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There’s nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari.”

If the Supreme Court decides to grant the “writ of certiorari,” it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court’s decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.

If any court hears the merits of the case, Apuzzo says it will mark the “death knell” for Obama’s legitimacy.

“Given my research of what a natural-born citizen is, he cannot be a natural-born citizen so it’s a death knell to his legitimacy. What happens on a practical level, how our political institutions would work that out, is something else,” Apuzzo told WND.

Apuzzo observed it is “undisputed fact” that Obama’s father was a British subject.

A hearing on the merits “is also a death knell because it would allow discovery so we would be able to ask him for his birth certificate, and we don’t know what that would show,” according to Apuzzo. “We might not even get to the question of defining ‘natural-born citizen.’ If he was not born in the U.S., he’d be undocumented, because he’s never been naturalized. We don’t even know what his citizenship status is. Hawaii has said they have his records, but that’s hearsay. We have not seen the root documents.”

Another attorney who has brought Obama eligibility cases to the Supreme Court, Philip Berg, agrees that discovery would sink Obama’s presidency.

“If one court had guts enough to deal with this and allow discovery, Obama would be out of office,” Berg told WND. “We would ask for a lift of Obama’s ban on all of his documents. The last official report said Obama has spent $1.6 million in legal fees [keeping his papers secret], and the total is probably over $2 million now. You don’t spend that kind of money unless there’s something to hide, and I believe the reason he’s hiding this is because he was not born in the United States.”

“The Supreme Court has never decided to hear the merits of an eligibility case,” Berg added. “If the Supreme Court would decide to hear a case, Obama would be out of office instantly. If Congress decided to hear a case, Obama would be out of office.”

“They’re taking a different approach, arguing that both parents must be citizens,” Berg noted.

Apuzzo is arguing the “Vattel theory,” which asserts that the term “natural-born citizen” as used in the Constitution was defined by French writer Emer de Vattel. Vattel, whose work, “The Law of Nations,” was widely known and respected by the founding fathers, used the term to mean an individual born of two citizens.

According to Apuzzo, Congress and the courts have addressed the question of who can be an American citizen, for example regarding former slaves, Asian immigrants, and American Indians. However, the term “natural-born citizen” has never been altered.

“The courts and Congress have never changed the definition,” said Apuzzo. “The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him.”

Apuzzo said the Supreme Court had clearly accepted Vattel’s definition of “natural-born citizen” in “dicta,” or statements made in opinions on cases addressing other matters. He cited Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the 1814 “Venus” case, in which Marshall endorses Vattel’s definition.

Apuzzo also cites the writings of founding father David Ramsay, an influential South Carolina physician and historian who used similar language to Vattel.

Previous cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have all been rejected on technical grounds. Numerous courts have decided that the plaintiffs do not have “standing” to bring a suit against Obama because they have failed to prove they are directly injured by his occupation of the Oval Office.

“To me that’s false,” said Berg. “The 10th Amendment refers to ‘we the people.’ If the people can’t challenge the president’s constitutionality, that would be ridiculous.”

“My clients have a right to protection from an illegitimately sitting president,” said Apuzzo. “Every decision he makes affects the life, property, and welfare of my clients.”

Apuzzo said the founding fathers had good reason to require the president to be a natural-born citizen.

“They were making sure the President had the values from being reared from a child in the American system, and thereby would preserve everybody’s life, liberty and property in the process.

“They made that decision, so my clients have every right to expect the president to be a natural-born citizen. It goes to all your basic rights, every right that is inalienable. The president has to be a natural-born citizen.”

Link to Article: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=232073

Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh have all questioned Obama’s birth certificate, natural born citizen status and eligibility to be president. Yesterday, Rush Limbaugh stated the following on his radio show:

“The imposter got into the equivalent of the White House in Afghanistan. Did they not ask this guy for some kind of identification? They clearly didn’t. They clearly didn’t ask this guy for his birth certificate. How in the world could they trust in a leader and even give money to somebody who has not been properly vetted? Well, because it happened here in the United States. We have an imposter for all intents and purposes serving in the White House.”

US Supreme Court conference, Kerchner v Obama, SCOTUS blog, Supreme Court of the United States blog, Akin Gump

 US Supreme Court conference, Kerchner v Obama, SCOTUS blog, Supreme Court of the United States blog, Akin Gump

As reported here this morning, Kerchner v Obama, filed by attorney Mario Apuzzo,  is to be distributed for Conference by the US Supreme Court Justices, today, November 23, 2010.

From the Supreme Court Docket:

Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm

A historic case, with ramifications that could shake the foundations of this country,  let’s see, why would the SCOTUS blog not be interested?

From the SCOTUS Blog.

“SCOTUSblog is devoted to comprehensively covering the U.S. Supreme Court—without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards.  The blog is provided as a public service and is sponsored by Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP.”

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/tuesday-round-up-49/

Well, you know, sometimes us pesky folks over at Citizen Wells get a little curious. And, well, I just had to know why such an important case such as this wasn’t worth mentioning. So I did a search on Akin Gump Obama contributions and discovered that these folks are real generous with their money. Akin Gump. You know, “Life is like a box of chocolates.”

“OBAMA FOR AMERICA
      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

FEC Committee ID #: C00431445
This report contains activity for a Primary Election
Report type: October Quarterly
This Report is an Amendment”

“AKIN GUMP    3,220.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD    4,250.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP    2,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER AND FELD    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP, LLP    75.65 ”

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q3/C00431445/A_EMPLOYER_C00431445.html

“OBAMA FOR AMERICA
      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

FEC Committee ID #: C00431445
This report contains activity for a Primary Election
Report type: July Quarterly
This Report is an Amendment”

“AKIN GUMP    2,350.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD    1,500.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP    7,600.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER AND FELD    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD    1,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAVER & FELD LLP    1,000.00 
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HEW & FIELD    500.00 
AKIN GUMP, ET AL    2,300.00 
AKIN GUMP, LLP    1,775.00 
AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP    1,000.00”

From CampaignMoney.com.

“Eliot Cutler Contribution List in 2008
Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar
Amount Date Primary/
General Contibuted To”

“Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $500 06/13/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $-500 06/13/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $500 06/13/2008 G OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 06/12/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $-1,700 06/12/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $1,700 06/12/2008 G OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 03/18/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

Cutler, Eliot
CAPE ELIZABETH, ME
04107 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP/ $2,000 01/31/2008 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat”

I did not do an extensive search. This information was obtained quickly. If any of the above is inaccurate, please let me know.

Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status, Obama birth certificate, Truth emerges, Kerchner v Obama, History being made

Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status, Obama birth certificate, Truth emerges, Kerchner v Obama, History being made

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From Citizen Wells yesterday.
“We are poised at historical moments in this country. Tomorrow, November 23, 2010, CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo, have a  Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference before the US Supreme Court. In mid December 2010, the court martial of LTC Terry Lakin will begin. LTC Lakin refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he believes that Obama is ineligible to be president and Commander in Chief.”

Today, the US Supreme is scheduled for conference regarding the Kerchner v Obama Petition for Writ of Certiorari. We are watching. With or without the US Supreme Court, the truth about Obama and his eligibility will emerge.

A great American Patriot and at the same time, average American, who has been providing information to me and this blog for over two years, one of the many concerned Americans who put the WE in CitizenWElls, sent me the following report. One person can make a difference.

From NewsFlavor November 22, 2010.

“The Ulsterman Report: Reflections on the White House Insider”

“Finally we have the portrait of a looming scandal Insider has so successfully woven throughout a number of these interviews.  Is this scandal legitimate, or simply a device to send the Obama White House scurrying for cover – some form of political distraction intended to allow Insider and others within the party to ultimately develop a platform in which to launch successful opposition?  “The DOJ, Washington DC, and then back to Chicago.”  According to Insider, there lies the path to this president’s downfall.  President Obama’s murky ties with some of Chicago’s most notorious politicos is known, though Insider might indicate not so nearly known as they should be.  What of Broadway Bank?  Shorebank?  Tony Rezko?  Rod Blagojevich? And so many other names that darken the murky past that is Barack Obama.  The Obama Department of Justice is now facing far more scrutiny than when Insider initially stated that this developing scandal would begin there – with the DOJ.  Is something to be found among the Black Panther voter intimidation case?  Has Attorney General Eric Holder been engaged in a protective cover up of Obama’s complicity in the Rod Blagojevich pay to play scandal?  And what of the “certification file” allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi?  Does such a file actually exist?  Was it Pelosi’s knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections?  Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else?   While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obama’s eligibility status as “birther” nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion.  Why?  If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all?  Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome?.  Of this I am certain – Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.

As for myself regarding the subject of the “birther” issue, I now openly admit to having “found religion” as it were.  There indeed does appear to be something amiss.  President Obama has spent millionshiding what most would indicate as rather basic information.  Education records.  Writings.  Travel records.  And yes, clear and comprehensive proof of birth and/or citizenship.  Until recently, I was among those who discounted claims of a cover-up surrounding Barack Obama’s birth story as the silly rants of those with far too much time and resulting paranoia on their hands.

No more.

Throughout the Insider interview series, good people have come forward to offer an abundance of information that at the very least, raises the distinct possibility that a determined and ongoing cover up has in fact been underway surrounding this nation’s current president – and any time there is a cover up, there exists the resulting and required question of WHY?  And so I am now left asking that very question, more often, and more loudly.  I hope to be able to ask it of Insider soon.

Insider – please respond.

More work remains undone – far too many questions remain unanswered…

_________

REFERENCES:

The Ulsterman Report: Banking Scandal Lurking for Obama in 2011?

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-banking-scandal-lurking-for-obama-in-2011/

White House Insider: Clintons, Scandals, and the Birth Certificate

http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-clintons-scandals-and-the-birth-certificate/

The Ulsterman Report: Obama White House -vs- Rahm Emanuel

 http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-obama-white-house-vs-rahm-emanuel/

SUPPORTIVE RESOURCES: 

-The invaluable help and guidance of the Ulsterman Facebook Followers.
-Habledash.com

-Hillbuzz.org
-Anthony G. Martin’s Liberty Sphere Report

-Citizenwells.com

-Godlikeproductions.com

-Freerepublic.com”

Read more:

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-reflections-on-the-white-house-insider/#ixzz164HAiVDh

“Never, never, never give up.”…Winston Churchill 

Glenn Beck hypocrite?, Beck Liar?, Beck supports military?, Beck upholds US Constitution?, Citizen Wells challenge

Glenn Beck hypocrite?, Beck Liar?, Beck supports military?, Beck upholds US Constitution?, Citizen Wells challenge

Glenn Beck is a likeable guy. I try to like Glenn Beck and I agree with him on many subjects. That does not excuse him from being held accountable.

When Glenn Beck started TheBlaze.com he stated that one of the reasons was to counteract the misinformation coming from sites like The Huffington Post. If that was his objective, he has failed.

I searched the following words on TheBlaze.com a few minutes ago.

Lakin
Kerchner
Vallely
McInerney

I got zero results on all four searches.

Of course, all four searches on Citizen Wells yield multiple results.

So Glenn Beck, what is your excuse? Are you a hypocrite, a liar? Do you support the military and the US Constitution? You have far more money and resources that I do. Glenn Beck, what is your excuse?
We are poised at historical moments in this country. Tomorrow, November 23, 2010, CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and his attorney Mario Apuzzo, have a  Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference before the US Supreme Court. In mid December 2010, the court martial of LTC Terry Lakin will begin. LTC Lakin refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he believes that Obama is ineligible to be president and Commander in Chief.

On August 31, 2010, Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney supplied an affidavit in support of Army Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin.

“For the foregoing reasons, it is my opinion that LTC Lakin’s request for discovery relating to the President’s birth records in Hawaii is absolutely essential to determining not merely his guilt or innocence but to reassuring all military personnel once and for all for this President whether his service as Commander in Chief is Constitutionally proper. He is the one single person in the Chain of Command that the Constitution demands proof of natural born citizenship. This determination is fundamental to our Republic, where civilian control over the military is the rule. According to our Constitution, the Commander in Chief must now, in the face of serious– and widely held– concerns that he is ineligible, either voluntarily establish his eligibility by authorizing release of his birth records or this court must authorize their discovery. The invasion of his privacy in these records is utterly trivial compared to the issues at stake here. Our military MUST have confidence their Commander in Chief lawfully holds this office and absent which confidence grievous consequences may ensue.”

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/press-release/aug-31-three-star-general-swears-affidavit.html
On June 5, 2010 Major General Paul E. Vallely, retired stated the following in a speech in Virginia City, Montana.

“We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) — based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Constitution.
And a call for a National Petition for new elections to select the next President of the United States of America must be initiated. We can wait no longer for a change of Power and new Government.”

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/06/08/major-general-calls-for-obama-resignation-paul-e-vallely-mgen-us-army-retired-barry-soetoro-aka-president-barack-hussein-obama-incompetence-deceit-fraud-corruption-dishonesty-and-violation/
I understand the mainstream media continuing to hide and misrepresent the truth about Obama and his eligibility issues. But you Glenn Beck! You are making it very difficult for me to respect you. What happens when your family finds out the truth. How will you explain that.

Glenn Beck, call me. You will be held accountable.

Oath of office, Military, Congress, Cub scouts, US Constitution, Duty, Citizen Wells open thread, November 22, 2010

Oath of office, Military, Congress, Cub scouts, US Constitution, Duty

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Oath: a solemn appeal to a deity, or to some revered person or thing, to witness one’s determination to speak the truth, to keep a promise, etc.: to testify upon oath.

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
So help me God.”…US Military officer’s oath of office

Officers in the service of the United States are bound by this oath to disobey any order that violates the Constitution of the United States.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

One of my friends who I see with some regularity always sees me working on my computer and often on this blog. He asked me recently why I do not take a day off from writing on this blog. I responded with one word, duty. It is my duty.

The first oath that I took.

Cub Scout Promise

“I, (say your name), promise
to DO MY BEST
To do my DUTY to GOD
And my Country
To HELP other people, and
To OBEY the LAW of the Pack.”

Cub Scout Motto

“DO YOUR BEST”

LTC Terry Lakin takes his oath seriously. He is facing court martial.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret), takes his oath seriously. He is the plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama. He and his attorney, Mario Apuzzo have a  Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference tomorrow, November 23, 2010, before the US Supreme Court.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/washington-times-scotus-kerchner-v.html

Members of Congress, we demand that you follow your oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;”

Ron Wyden to block COICA, Oregon senator opposes Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, Citizen Wells open thread, November 21, 2010

Ron Wyden to block COICA, Oregon senator opposes Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act

From PC World November 19, 2010.

“A U.S. senator has vowed to fight attempts to pass a controversial copyright protection bill that would allow the U.S. government to shut down websites suspected of hosting infringing materials.

Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, said late Thursday that he would seek to block the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, or COICA, from passing through the full Senate, unless the legislation is changed. Earlier Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 19-0 to approve the bill and send it to the full Senate.

Wyden called the bill the “wrong medicine” for dealing with online copyright infringement. The bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice to seek expedited court orders requiring U.S. domain-name registrars to shut down domestic websites suspected of hosting infringing materials. The bill would also allow the DOJ, through court orders, to order U.S. ISPs to redirect customer traffic away from infringing foreign websites.

“Deploying this statute to combat online copyright infringement seems almost like using a bunker-busting cluster bomb, when what you need is a precision-guided missile,” Wyden said during a hearing on digital trade issues. “If you don’t think this thing through carefully, the collateral damage would be American innovation, American jobs, and a secure Internet.”

Wyden’s opposition means the bill is likely dead this year. Individual senators can place holds on legislation, and there are only a few working days left in the congressional session this year. Sponsors of the legislation, including fellow Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, would have to reintroduce the bill if it doesn’t pass this year.”

“COICA is an example of repeated efforts to fix long-time problems through Internet restrictions, said Ed Black, president and CEO of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a tech trade group. The Judiciary Committee pushed through the bill without adequate hearings and input from the public, Black said.

“The significance and implications of the legislation I don’t think have been well thought through,” Black said during the hearing on digital trade. “Sadly, it’s an example of what not to do in an important, complicated digital ecosystem.””

Read  more:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/211162/senator_threatens_to_block_online_copyright_bill.html

I agree with senator Ron Wyden and Ed Black. This bill gives the government too much power and was not well thought out.

For starters, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont is the sponsor. That should be red flag enough. This is the same Senator Leahy of Vermont who did not reply to my voice message or email when I was in Burlington, VT when I got the video of the Senator Bernie Sanders speech and a brief interview.

And what about these Republican Senator cosponsors?

Lamar Alexander [R-TN]
Thomas Coburn [R-OK]
Lindsey Graham [R-SC]
Charles Grassley [R-IA]
Orrin Hatch [R-UT]
James Inhofe [R-OK]
George Voinovich [R-OH]

More RINO’s? Or are they just not paying attention or listening to the public?

I am not certain if the full text of the bill is available yet. My first 2 attempts to get it failed.

From GovTrack, a summary.

“Congressional Research Service Summary

The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.

9/20/2010–Introduced.
Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act – Amends the federal criminal code to authorize the Attorney General (AG) to commence an action for injunctive relief against a domain name used by an Internet site that is “dedicated to infringing activities,” even where such a domain name is not located in the United States. Defines an Internet site that “dedicated to infringing activities” as a site that is: (1) subject to civil forfeiture; (2) designed primarily to offer goods or services in violation of federal copyright law; or (3) selling counterfeit goods. Requires the AG to maintain a public listing of domain names that the Department of Justice (DOJ) determines are dedicated to infringing activities but for which the AG has not filed an action. Allows parties to petition the AG to remove such a domain name from the list and obtain judicial review of the final determination in a civil action.”

Read more:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3804

Another source of information:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3804/show

Obama eligibility in Supreme Court November 23, 2010, Congressmen are you listening?, Military or court records or biased media reporting?

Obama eligibility in Supreme Court November 23, 2010, Congressmen are you listening?, Military or court records or biased media reporting?

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Reported here November 8, 2010.

Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari Distributed for Conference by the Justices on 23 Nov 2010
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm

Contact Attorney Mario Apuzzo for more details and comment at:
Mario Apuzzo, Esq., Jamesburg, New Jersey
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Tel: 732-521-1900, Fax: 732-521-3906
Email: apuzzo@erols.com
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####”

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.
Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

Read more:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/kerchner-v-obama-update-november-8-2010-writ-of-certiorari-distributed-to-us-supreme-court-justices/

Reported November 17, 2010.

“From the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal November 17, 2010.”

“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

“My response to the following paragraph from above:

“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

The following is a factual statement:

“most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961″

Most “news organizations” did repeat that lie.

“there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

Apparently, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal is part of the conspiracy to perpetuate the lies.

Facts:

July 2009 AOL Poll: 81% say Obama should release birth certificate.

August 2009 Public Policy Polling of Virginia:

Born elsewhere 24%

Not sure 24%

July 2010 CNN Poll: Less than half were convinced of Obama US birth.

Probably born in US 29 %

Probably born elsewhere 16 %

Definitely born elsewhere 11 %

So,  Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, what is your excuse for inaccurate reporting?”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/texas-bill-birth-certificate-required-for-presidential-candidate-texas-secretary-of-state-obama-birth-certificate-lubbock-avalanche-journal/

I posted a comment under this article:

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”

The following classic left wing response to my comment:

“The Answer: He hasn’t.

Get a life, birthertard”

Here is one of numerous court records that prove that the commenter and the mainstream media are liars.

From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner v Obama & Congress to be conferenced on by Supreme Court on Tuesday, 23 Nov 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress

Members of Congress, are you paying attention?

Who or what do you put your trust in?

Rumors, biased media reports?

Or do you listen to high ranking military officers, knowledgeable, patriotic attorneys, concerned Americans?

Do you believe court documents?

How about US Supreme Court documents?

Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

For Immediate Release – 19 November 2010

Unconstitutionally, Ineligible Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html
Ineligible and Unconstitutionally Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution  by: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.
http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields

Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Congress 101, How to act like a congressman, US Constitution, Support military, Listen to public, Act like you have some damn sense

Congress 101, How to act like a congressman, US Constitution, Support military, Listen to public, Act like you have some damn sense

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

New members of Congress recently received indoctrination on how Congress works. If past results are any indication, forget everything you heard unless it pertained to…

  • Uphold and defend the US Constitution. It is the supreme law of the land.
  • Support the military.
  • Listen to the public and act like you have some damn sense.

Most in the military take their oath to defend the US Constitution seriously. One military officer, LTC Terry Lakin, is living that oath.

From American Patriot Foundation.

“American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin’s Case
http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com
 
 
THANK YOU to everyone for the tremendous response and participation in “Terry Lakin Action Week”- your phone calls and messages are making a difference. We apologize to anyone who hasn’t received a response yet back to an email- we do our best to keep up, but it is hard sometimes to keep abreast of all requests and comments received.
 
PLEASE KEEP UP THE PRESSURE- PHONE CALLS TO ELECTED OFFICIALS MATTER- AND A SPECIAL THANKS TO THOSE OF YOU WHO WALKED INTO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OFFICES TO RAISE YOUR VOICE IN SUPPORT OF LTC LAKIN.
 
Just this week, there were significant new developments on the eligibility front:
A state legislator in Texas introduced a bill requiring presidential candidates to file birth certificates- with the notable comment below:
 
“This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place,’ Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, said in reference to President Barack Obama and of House Bill 295. ‘If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.
http://lubbockonline.com/local-news/2010-11-17/birth-certificate-bill-filed-presidential-candidates
 
AND— former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, in an interview in Anchorage pointed out the failure to vet Barack Obama in 2008:
 
Sarah Palin chatted with KWHL’s Bob and Mark Show to discuss the re-release of John Ziegler’s documentary How Obama Got Elected and her travelogue series, telling Bob and Mark that the hagiographic coverage of Obama in 2007-8 is now “coming home to roost”:
 
We know that Obama wasn’t vetted through the campaign, and now, you know, some things are coming home to roost, if you will, which is inexperience, his associations, and that ultimately harms our republic when a candidate isn’t – isn’t vetted by the media, that cornerstone of our democracy. So, you’re right, it’s not about me and whether you like my politics or not. You can push all that aside, and just pay attention to what that message is in this documentary, and that is that things have got to change for the better in the state of journalism. Otherwise, you know, it could be part of a demise of our democracy if that cornerstone erodes.
 
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/video-sarah-palin-we-know-that-obama.html
 
Be sure to download and read our Congressional Blunders report avaiable from the home page of our site.
 
// Margaret Hemminway
// www.safeguardourconstitution.com

WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW
Support Terry’s Communications Efforts
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/support-the-foundation.html

Add a Banner to Your Website
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/banners-and-graphics.html
Forward this email to anyone you feel may have an interest in Terry’s case.”

High ranking military officers are speaking out, questioning Obama’s eligibility and at least one general has called for Obama’s resignation. If you were in Congress in  2008 and 2009 and bought in to the Orwellian lies from the media and Obama camp and the hustle from Obama, pay attention and admit that you made a mistake. If you are not willing to trust members of the military like LTC Terry Lakin, then pay attention to this.

Obama the hustler.

“Bartle Bull, lifelong liberal Democrat, Civil Rights Attorney, called Obama a “hustler.””

(From Atlas Shrugs)

“The Biggest Hustle in Human History”

“Is the President’s resume accurate when it comes to his career and qualifications? I can corroborate that Obama’s “teaching career” at Chicago was, to put it kindly, a sham.

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on his bar application. …”

“Curiously, since I relayed a report of Obama’s “teaching career” at Chicago (he was apparently never a law professor, as some have claimed), the Illinois Bar has decided to partially redact what little public information it had available on its website related to the President’s legal status.”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2010/11/19/obama-hustler-democrat-bartle-bull-called-obama-hustler-obama-resume-hustle-no-professor-no-law-license/