Injunctions and or decertifications must be filed in AZ GA MI NV PA WI to delay Electoral votes Dec 14, No winner determined by legal vote count, Fraud illegalities proven
“§ 8. The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”...US Election Law
“Electoral College electors owe an allegiance first and foremost to the US Constitution over State and political party dictates.”...Citizen Wells
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln
The legislatures of these states must decertify the corrupt illegal vote count and/or a citizen must request an injunction to delay the Electoral College vote. There is nothing sacred about December 14 and a delay would be the clear lesser of evils.
Arizona
Georgia
Michigan
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Minnesota
Wisconsin
To do otherwise jeopardizes the integrity of the election and certainly will encourage a challenge in Congress January 6 and a potential constitutional crisis.
It is also unfair to the electors who are at the mercy of corrupt state officials.
If these electors vote, knowing full well that the results have been unconstitutionally certified, they become complicit with state officials in fraud.
Ultimately the electors have a duty to follow the US Constitution irrespective of state or political party rules.
Antrim County MI Dominion test update, Corrupt AG Nessel and SOS Benson hide results, Protective order to be lifted Monday? Guilty dogs bark loudest
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state. On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020
From the Gateway Pundit article below:
“Will A Small County In Northern Michigan Be The Key To Overturning The Nation’s Election Results? America Should Find Out On Monday”
Background on Dominion Voting Systems testing and issues highlighted by Antrim County Michigan.
From Citizen Wells December 8, 2020.
“The following is a summary of major events leading up to, during and after the 2020 Election involving concerns and documented fraud tied to Dominion Voting Systems in multiple states.
As you read the following, Dominion executive Eric Coomer stated the following shortly before the election:
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”
That has to be taken seriously!
PRE ELECTION.
Texas tested Dominion for the third time and reported their rejection in February 2019.
“Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, said they decided not to go with Dominion software for vote counting in the 2020 election, as they had recognized there were problems with it, and it couldn’t be trusted.”
“Texas Dominion Voting Systems testing and evaluations report dated February 15, 2019.
“Re: Inspection of the Dominion Voting Systems’ Democracy Suite 5.5 conducted on January 16 and 17, 2019″
“Why on earth would we buy less-secure machines that are opposed by the voters, opposed by national security experts, at risk of being decertified right now in New York, are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots, are possibly going to be decertified by the national election authorities within 2-4 years, when we’re spending, taking out a 20-year bond,” Parent said. “You start saying, ‘Why on earth would we buy these things?’
“I have been baffled, absolutely baffled. This is not a partisan issue — you don’t do voting machines on a party-line vote. This is crazy. And so I’m like, what is going on here? I’ve been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There’s not one good reason. So therefore, it just reeks of corruption — that we’re prioritizing vendors over voters.”
Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.
The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.
POST ELECTION.
Ware County Georgia:
“
Robb Hurst, CPA
@robbhurstCPA
·
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.”
“ROBERT W. HURST, JR.CPA, BUSINESS OWNER
Robb graduated from the University of Georgia with both, his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting, 1989, and Master of Taxation, 1990. He began his career in public accounting in 1991 at the national accounting firm KPMG Peat Marwick in Greenville, SC. In 1992, after the death of his dad’s partner, Robb and his wife Lorna journeyed home to Douglas, GA to work with Robert Hurst, Sr., until his retirement in 2004, at Hurst & Hurst CPAs, LLC.
Robb specializes in dealing with the accounting and tax problems of small businesses and their owners. He has extensive experience in the retail, restaurant, construction, healthcare and other professional industries. Other areas in which he exceeds the expertise of most is his in depth knowledge of accounting and auditing procedures and financial reporting requirements for government and nonprofits.”
Antrim County Michigan Dominion audit.
It is concerning that any test conducted now will be subject to scrubbing or altering of data and equipment.
“Sheriff asks judge to block Michigan order for clerks to delete election data”
“Michigan Attorney Gives Behind the Scenes Update on the IT Inspection of the Antrim County Dominion Machines
On November 16, several members of the MI State legislature sent a letter to Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson requesting that a full, independent audit of the accusations prior to the certification of the vote. This was after reviewing hundreds of sworn affidavits by GOP and Independent poll challengers and evidence of vote switching by Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. The radical Secretary of State, who has a problem with telling the truth, ignored their request.
On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”
“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”
“Mr. DePerno expects to have the results of the study sometime tomorrow. He explained the forensic images of the thumb drives and the master computer would tell if machines were connected to the internet—and if they were, who were they communicating with? DePerno said the examination would be able to determine the algorithms used by the computer and will provide the number of ballots read through the machine compared to the actual number of paper ballots.”
Citizen Wells has serious concerns about the current Antrim County audit due to the elapsed time after the election and the distrust of Dominion and election officials.
Thank God Colonel Waldron and his team monitored the election real time and did a follow up on site evaluation in Antrim County.”
“In a solidly red county in northern Michigan where Trump banners, flags, and yard signs can be found in almost every front yard, voters woke up to discover Joe Biden had walloped President Trump, only to find out shortly later that Dominion voting machines flipped thousands of votes cast for Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden. The media called it a “glitch” and blamed it on human error.”
“Two more unexplainable vote counts in Antrim County also left voters stunned by the unexplainable outcome of the vote result by Dominion. In Central Lake’s School Board election, 742 votes were added to the total after a recount on November 6. (First image below)
Dominion’s vote totals showed 663 people voted in a district where there were only 6 eligible voters and only 3 of those 6 actually voted. Somehow, Dominion added 660 additional votes to the final tally.”
“DePerno waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant on Wednesday.
On Friday, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno, who is now in possession of the initial preliminary results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machine, 16 CV data cards, and 16 thumb drives from the Dominion machines, filed an emergency order asking Judge Kevin Elsenheimer to lift the protective order prohibiting him from sharing the results of the inspection, calling it a matter of “national security.” In his emergency motion, DePerno reminds the judge that time is of the essence, as the deadline for electors to vote for the next President is Monday, December 14, 2020.”
“DePerno asked for the preliminary results of the election to be released to the people of Antrim Co, of the State of MI, of the USA, and to the President and Vice President of the United States, as well as Chad Wolf, Sec. of Homeland Security and DNI John Ratcliff.”
“Later today, Attorney Matthew DePerno received word that 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elseneheimer would hear his case. Curiously, DePerno, who filed the emergency motion, found out about the hearing when he saw an article published by the far-left Detroit Free Press at 2:13 PM. DePerno then received an email from Antrim County attorney Haider Kazim at 2:50 PM and received notice directly from the Court at 3:02 PM. According to DePerno, the hearing will take place at 8:30 AM EST on Monday.”
Arizona Electoral College Electors and AZ legislature warning, Voting for candidate chosen by fraudulent certification is fraud, Injunction required
“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State
“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
The 2020 election proceedings in Arizona have been governed by fraud from start to finish in the illegal certification of votes, knowing full well the results are not valid. That only legal ballots were counted.
The top election official in Arizona, the Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs, is biased, a Trump and Trump follower hater.
Another indication of Katie Hobbs sincerity level and lack of adhering to the US Constitution was the “certiification” of votes in the middle of a hearing that exposed fraud and irregularities in the AZ election. In the photo she does an elbow bump with corrupt Governor Ducey.
Fortunately Arizona has an honest Attorney General, Mark Brnovich. Mr. Brnovich filed an Amicus brief in support of the Texas US Supreme Court lawsuit.
“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards” for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”). ”
Arizona State Rep. Mark Finchem November 30, 2020.
“We are clawing our electoral college votes back, we will not release them. That’s what I’m calling our colleagues in both the House and the Senate to do,” added Finchem. “Exercise our plenary authority under the U.S. Constitution.”
Dr. Kelli Ward, Chair Woman of the Arizona GOP, recently sampled 100 ballots and found a 3 % error that favored Biden over Trump.
A subsequent sample of over 1500 ballots found a discrerpancy greater than the percentage difference in the election total.
That case is still before the Arizona Supreme Court.
From the Arizona legislature press release December 4, 2020 calling for an audit of Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County.
“Senate President Karen Fann and Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers today called an independent audit of the Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the 2020 General Election. The two leaders, along with incoming Senate Government Chair Michelle Ugenti-Rita and House Majority Leader Warren Petersen, had numerous phone calls with members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,”
“A significant number of voters believe that fraud occurred and with the number of irregularities it is easy to understand why. Especially concerning are the allegations made surrounding the vendor Dominion.”
Wood v Raffensperger Georgia Supreme Court case docketed Dec 11, Motion for expedited consideration of the petition for Writ of Certiorari
“Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would”...Texas response to defendants motions
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
I strongly believe my appeal to US Supreme Court has merit & 11/3 GA election was unlawful. My legal rationale tracks subsequently filed Texas petition re: GA. After 43 years of law practice, I know lawyers cannot control judges. We do the best we can & pray they get it right.
Quote Tweet
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
·
I filed this lawsuit on my own since time was of the essence. GA election was unlawful. It diluted our in-person votes & violated equal protection. I do not know if my case will be successful. But the cherished right to vote belongs to each individual member of We The People. twitter.com/llinwood/statu…
Search documents in this case:Search
No. 20-799
Title:
L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner
v.
Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.
Docketed:
December 11, 2020
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Numbers:
(20-14418)
Decision Date:
December 5, 2020
DATE
PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS
Dec 08 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 11, 2021)
L. LIN WOOD, JR.
Petitioner,
vs.
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, et al.,
MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF
THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
“6. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision gave insufficient regard to the
Secretary of State’s unlawful and unconstitutional usurpation of the Georgia
Legislature’s plenary authority to prescribe “[t]he Times, Places, and Manner” for theconduct of presidential and congressional elections. See Art. I, § 4, cl. L Bush v. Palm Beach Cnty. Canvassing Bd., 531 U.S. 70, 77 (2000) (per curiam). That court incorrectly rejected Petitioner’s constitutional challenge to the unlawful election procedure, which diluted his vote and violated his rights to equal protection under the U.S. Constitution.
7. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision affirming the denial of emergency relief
has now sanctioned the Secretary of State’s fundamentally and irredeemably flawed procedures concerning the “manner” for the conduct ofthe presidential and senatorial (federal) elections, in violation of constitutional mandates, which only underscores its error. See Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).”
“9. Unless this Court grants expedited consideration and relief, requiring
that the constitutional deficiencies be remedied almost immediately, it will be
impossible to repair the election results tainted by illegally cast ballots before Ignoration Day. Thus, without expedited review, Petitioner’s appellate rights – and this Court’s power to resolve the important constitutional questions presented by this election – will be irrevocably lost. Cf. Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U.S. 165, 178 (2013). In other words, expedited review is, as a practical matter, the only way to protect this Court’s ability to conduct a plenary review of the Eleventh Circuit’s rulings concerning the 2020 Presidential election.1”
Texas reply in motion for interim injunctive relief against GA MI WI PA Dec 11,”Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would”
“Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would”...Texas response to defendants motions
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
One of the most important statements in the Texas response below is:
“Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would”
The elephant in the room.
Let’s add more clarity to that.
Due to the documented disregard for state election laws, rampant ballot and voter fraud, machine malfunctions and manipulations and human error, we do not know who lawfully won the election.
This affects every citizen in the US and indeed of the world.
It certainly disenfranchises every voter.
Any illegal ballots tossed disenfranchise no one.
From
STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF
GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, AND STATE OF
WISCONSIN,
Defendants.
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR STAY AND
ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
December 11, 2020.
“REPLY IN SUPPORT OF INTERIM RELIEF
The State of Texas respectfully replies in support
of its motion for interim injunctive relief against the
States of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (collectively, the
“Defendant States”) and their agents, officers,
presidential electors, and others acting in concert.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant States do not seriously address grave
issues that Texas raises, choosing to hide behind other
court venues and decisions in which Texas could not
participate and to mischaracterize both the relief that
Texas seeks and the justification for that relief. An
injunction should issue because Defendant States
have not—and cannot—defend their actions.”
“Second, Texas does not ask this Court to reelect
President Trump, and Texas does not seek to
disenfranchise the majority of Defendant States’
voters. To both points, Texas asks this Court to
recognize the obvious fact that Defendant States’
maladministration of the 2020 election makes it
impossible to know which candidate garnered the
majority of lawful votes. The Court’s role is to strike
unconstitutional action and remand to the actors that
the Constitution and Congress vest with authority for
the next step. U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2; 3 U.S.C. §
2. Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as
taking action allegedly would. Moreover, acting
decisively will not only put lower courts but also state
and local officials on notice that future elections must
conform to State election statutes, requiring
legislative ratification of any change prior to the
election. Far from condemning this and other courts
to perpetual litigation, action here will stanch the
flood of election-season litigation.”
”
CONCLUSION
The motion for interim relief enjoining Defendant
States from certifying Presidential Electors and from
having such electors vote in the electoral college until
further order of this Court should be granted.
Alternatively, this Court should summarily vacate
Defendant States’ certification of presidential electors
and remand to Defendant States’ legislatures
pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and the Electors Clause.”
Josh Stein NC AG joined other corrupt Democrat Attorney Generals opposing Texas, Potential conflict of interest, Stein “won” by 13k+, Sidney Powell stated voter fraud in North Carolina
“NC Attorney General Josh Stein, who “won” in 2020 by 13k+ votes and possible voter fraud, has added North Carolina to the opposing brief to Texas in the SCOTUS. Stein must be removed from office.”…Citizen Wells
“Sidney Powell in her Alpharetta GA speech, mentioned NC as having voter fraud.”...Keep America Free Rally
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
President Trump won North Carolina.
NC Attorney General Josh Stein “won” by 13k + votes.
Sidney Powell, in her Georgia rally mentioned NC, her native state, as having experienced voter fraud.
Josh Stein has a potential conflict of interest.
BTW,
Sidney Powell is from Durham County NC.
Durham county went 81 % for Stein.
It is also the most liberal county in NC and one of the most suspect for voter fraud.
Neighboring Wake County, location of Raleigh and the seat of NC government went 63 % for Stein.
Does Sidney Powell know something?
From the Amicus brief:
“The District of Columbia together with the States and territories of California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, and
Washington (collectively, the “Amici States”) move for leave to file the enclosed brief as amici curiae in support of defendants and in opposition to plaintiff’s leave to file a bill of complaint (i) without 10 days’ advance notice to the parties of amici’s intent to file as ordinarily required by Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a), and (ii) in an unbound format on 8½-by-11-inch paper rather than in booklet form.”
“JOSHUA H. STEIN
Attorney General
State of North Carolina”
“ARGUMENT
I. The Electors Clause Provides No Basis To Second-Guess State Courts
And Local Actors In Their Interpretation Of State Law.
Texas and its amici, including Missouri and other states (“Missouri Amici”),
contend that by interpreting or implementing state law, state officials and state courts have “encroached upon the ‘plenary’ authority of [Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin’s] respective legislatures over the conduct of the Presidential election,” thereby violating the Electors Clause. Missouri et al. Br. 5; see U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2. That reading of the Electors Clause, however, would upend a century’s worth of this Court’s precedent; render unconstitutional routine and critical election administration; and supplant states’ sovereign power to structure their own systems of government. Indeed, by demanding this Court police state interpretation of state law, Texas’s theory of the Electors Clause would reorder the Constitution and undermine our federalist system.”
YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud ”
“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″
“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””...George Orwell, “1984”
“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells
YouTube for years has presented a category of “Top News”.
And what do you find there? The kings of fake news CBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
They have been allowing smaller sites, with diverse opinions and reporting up until yesterday when they announced a new policy.
“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections.”
Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
From the Arizona AG Mark Brnovich
Motion to file Amicus in
STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN
“The State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General
(collectively, the “State of Arizona”) respectfully move for leave to file a brief as
amici curiae respecting the motions for leave to file a bill of complaint and for a
preliminary injunction in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a). If granted leave, the
State of Arizona’s brief will make two primary points.1
The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards”
for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”).
The State will also argue that if this Court exercises jurisdiction over Texas’s
complaint, it is equally important that the Court act quickly to give the Nation
certainty.”
Georgia election fraud evidence presented to SOS for verification? added to lawsuits, Matt Braynard Voter Integrity Project: more than enough to flip GA
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit
“Voter Integrity Project Leader Matt Braynard to Submit Absentee Vote Findings to Georgia Case
Evidence of voter fraud gathered by Voter Integrity Project (VIP) will be submitted to the Georgia lawsuit and four other contested states. VIP was started by Matt Braynard, the former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President, after widespread distrust in absentee ballots arose following the 2020 election results.
Braynard has stated in multiple interviews that VIP findings are enough to flip states.
Friday, Braynard shared that his work would also appear in cases in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. He stated that he will appear in person to discuss his Arizona-related findings during the Arizona hearing.
Braynard created VIP to conduct an independent investigation, putting off a scheduled family vacation immediately following Election Night.
Over the course of several weeks, VIP called absentee ballot voters in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Wisconsin. Team members relied on voter registration public records to ask individuals to verify that they’d requested and returned a ballot.”
“Braynard summarized some of his findings in a public video published last week. His research found that anywhere from 18 to 44 percent of those respondents listed as having requested absentee ballots reported not requesting the ballots. Additionally, his team found sizable numbers of respondents who reported having returned their ballots – though the state didn’t count them.
Braynard stated that they’d also discovered respondents who reported not voting, though they were listed as having voted. Further, their team learned that some individuals were reported as having voted in certain states – despite having moved.
Braynard mentioned that he has signed several declarations for cases across the country.”
Trump Wisconsin election challenge lawsuit filings raise questions, Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18): “these actions should be filed in the circuit court”, Why not filed there?
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8
Citizen Wells has a good fundamental knowledge of how the court system works and interacts.
Over half of the state statutes have been read and they have a common thread of election challenge avenues and remedies.
When the Trump Wisconsin lawsuit was first filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court there was some head scratching.
From The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel December 3, 2020.
“The state Supreme Court rejected a request Thursday by President Donald Trump to revoke the certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
The 4-3 decision left room for Trump to bring a new challenge to the election results and the president quickly did so. But the high court’s ruling provided a serious setback for him because even some of the dissenting justices signaled they do not support Trump’s call for throwing out hundreds of thousands of ballots.
Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn and the court’s three liberals declined to take the case he filed directly with them because state law requires election challenges like his to be filed in circuit court.
“We do well as a judicial body to abide by time-tested judicial norms, even — and maybe especially — in high-profile cases,” he wrote. “Following the law governing challenges to election results is no threat to the rule of law.””
“All parties seem to agree that Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18)1
constitutes the “exclusive judicial remedy” applicable to this claim. § 9.01(11). After all, that is what the statute says. This section provides that these actions should be filed in the circuit court, and spells out detailed procedures
for ensuring their orderly and swift disposition. See § 9.01(6)–(8). Following this law is not disregarding our duty, as some of my colleagues suggest. It is following the law.”
The next filing was also confusing to observers and to U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig.
From Boston.com December 5, 2020.
Judge calls Trump request in Wisconsin lawsuit ‘bizarre’
“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”
““It’s a request for pretty remarkable declaratory relief,” said U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig during a conference call to set deadlines and a hearing date. Ludwig, who said it was “an unusual case, obviously,” also cast doubt on whether a federal court should be considering it at all.
“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”
The judge questioned why Trump wasn’t going directly to the Legislature if he wants lawmakers to get involved with naming electors.”
Citizen WElls 
