YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud “

YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud ”

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””...George Orwell, “1984”

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

YouTube for years has presented a category of “Top News”.

And what do you find there? The kings of fake news CBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc.

They have been allowing smaller sites, with diverse opinions and reporting up until yesterday when they announced a new policy.

“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/09/youtube-aka-big-brother-lies-about-election-will-remove-videos-that-challenge-their-views-no-president-elect-until-jan-6-at-earliest-likely-biased-not-stupid/

First of all the first line is a huge Orwellian Lie!

There is no president elect until January 6 at the earliest.

The electors have not even voted yet!

But why yesterday did they invoke an Orwellian Thought Police edict directed at alleged fraud in the 2020 election.

They panicked!

They knew that US Supreme Court filings were coming and that they would be loaded with references to fraud.

From the highest court in the nation with the most credible legal documents and arguments.

They could not allow videos referencing that to discredit their fake news accomplices.

The Texas lawsuit has 6 references to “fraud.”

The 17 state Amicus brief has 89 references to “fraud.”!!!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163215/20201209144840609_2020-12-09%20-%20Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Missouri%20et%20al.%20-%20Final%20with%20Tables.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 responses to “YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud “

  1. “Our policies prohibit misleading viewers about where and how to vote. We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election.”
    Youtube

  2. BREAKING—US Supreme court votes 6.3-5.1 against Texas!

    We’ve been rooked again!

  3. AND……
    ……….the SCOTUS is no longer the defining body it once was. They are NO LONGER A COURT OF TEST, they are now a court of DISPOSITION.!!!! The SCOTUS NOW dances to their OWN tune, AND NOT THAT OF THE CONSTITUTION. IT HAS BECOME A USELESS PACK OF PARASITES.

  4. fhl,

    Where did you get this info? It doesn’t appear anywhere. Please post a link if you have it. Thanks.

    I was under the impression that the contested states were to answer the TX complaint today, and that was it. There are now 18 states on board.

  5. sue, it was a joke. there are nine supreme court members. the joke is there are 11.4 votes cast on the supreme court.

  6. fhl, that’s what I get for trying to do work on one computer and have Citizen Wells pulled up on the other. I thought you were using some wacky formula I didn’t understand.

    DUH!

    Thanks :).

  7. CW, my old computer won’t download a BitChute vid, so I’m sending it to work so that I can watch on Friday.

  8. That post i put up the other day about the FBI admitting they had Seth Rich’s laptop had a follow up article. One thing interesting it said was that the FBI would have given the laptop back to the Rich’s if it was a botched robbery. Instead they kept it for four years. And are still keeping it. Implying they don’t want anyone to see what is on there.

  9. Thanks Sue.
    Interesting

  10. PS try the video again.

  11. Pingback: NOY Not on YouTube “fraud” occurs 89 times in 17 state Amicus in Texas case, “non-legislative actors” stripped away “critical safeguards against ballot fraud” | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s