Category Archives: Attorneys

Arizona mandated “hand count audit’ raises more questions than answers, Maricopa County 10.8k less senate votes, Sidney Powell 42k ballots only Biden

Arizona mandated “hand count audit'” raises more questions than answers, Maricopa County 10.8k less senate votes, Sidney Powell 42k ballots only Biden

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Mantra of the left: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

 

Arizona’s mandated “hand count audit” is practically worthless.

It selects 2% of ballots by county from the “universe” of ballots that it received and kept and all that it effectively proves is that the tabulators function the same way as during the initial count.

The real questions are:

  1. How many ballots were not delivered at all or by the cutoff date?
  2. How many ballots were fraudulent?
  3. How many ballots were rejected by improper processing?
  4. How many ballots had only Biden selected & thus suspect?
  5. How many votes were misrepresented by humans?
  6. How many ballots were processed that were ineligible?

Etc, etc.

An examination of the Arizona State Hand Count Audits page raises questions that will be left to the reader for the moment.

https://azsos.gov/node/1247

An examination of the Maricopa County ‘audit” raises a least one red flag.

The difference between the presidential and senate votes.

President votes:  2,894

Senator votes:   2,678

A difference of 216.

Taking this 2% to 100% of the county the total difference for the county is

10,800.

That is the approximate current Biden lead.

Coincidence?

Is this part of the 42k ballots with only Biden selected Sidney Powell found?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

“Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,”  “The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.”…Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Arizona’s voter participation rate is 78.6%. Wisconsin’s is over 89%. Somebody is lying.”…Citizen Wells

 

From Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State.

 

1. “Qualified electors casting ballots in person on Election Day in Maricopa County submitted their completed ballot to an electronic tabulation machine. Numerous voters were alerted by these devices to a facial irregularity in their ballot—frequently an ostensible ‘overvote’ — but were induced by poll workers to override the tabulator’s rejection of the ballot in the good faith belief that their vote would be duly registered and tabulated. In actuality, overriding the electronic tabulator’s alert automatically disqualifies the putative ‘overvotes’ without additional review or adjudication.​”

2. Arizona law requires that putative overvotes be subjected to further review in
an effort to discern the actual intent of the voter. While this safeguard was afforded to putative overvotes cast on early ballots and on Election Day ballots that poll workers properly segregated in a separate repository, potentially thousands of voters across Maricopa County have been disenfranchised by systematic improper tabulator overrides.

3. Upon information and belief, the adjudication and tabulation of these ballots
will prove determinative of the outcome of the election for President of the United States in Arizona and/or other contested offices in Maricopa County.

4. Declaratory, injunctive and mandamus remedies are necessary to prevent
irreparable injury to the Plaintiffs, vindicate the clear directives of the Arizona Legislature, ensure the fair and equal treatment of all Maricopa County electors, and secure the integrity of the results of the November 3, 2020 general election.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-complaint-with-attachments.pdf

From NewsMax November 11, 2020.

“An Arizona state court judge refused to seal evidence, including video taken within a polling place and declaration of witnesses with their name and other identifying information, in a case brought by the Trump campaign and Arizona Republican Party claiming voter fraud.

Judge Daniel Kiley refused the request, Phoenix NBC network affiliate KPNX reported, apparently agreeing with attorneys for Maricopa County officials.

The Trump campaign and Arizona GOP filed the lawsuit on Saturday claiming that thousands of votes in Maricopa County were unlawfully disqualified or considered ”overvotes” — voided because they were marked for more than one candidate in the same race. They asked for the sealing of the evidence in a subsequent motion.

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/arizona-fraud-evidence-seal/2020/11/11/id/996632/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Arizona 12k Biden lead with over 24k ballots uncounted < .5%, Attorney Sidney Powell states 42k ballots suspect, Fraud and irregularities, Recount and Fox apology required

Arizona 12k Biden lead with over 24k ballots uncounted < .5%, Attorney Sidney Powell states 42k ballots suspect, Fraud and irregularities, Recount and Fox apology required

“Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”…Kevin Shipp

“Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment I know how they operate,” he said, pointing out Democrats control the political apparatus that counts the votes, the polling places, and the people who count the votes. “It’s a time-honored tradition” he said of Democratic election fraud.”…Rod Blagojevich, NewsMax Nov 6, 2020

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

 

By 7:00 AM ET this morning only 12k votes separate Joe Biden and President Trump.

Over 24k ballots are uncounted.

The difference is less than .5 percent.

Numerous allegations of fraud and voting irregularities have surfaced.

From Attorney Sidney Powell.

Fraud allegations and voting irregularities including voting hardware and software must be investigated.

A recount and an apology from Fox News are required.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Massive Detroit election fraud alleged in Costantino and McCall v City of Detroit Election Commission et al, Nov 8, 2020, “numerous issues of fraud and misconduct”

Massive Detroit election fraud alleged in Costantino and McCall v City of Detroit Election Commission et al, Nov 8, 2020, “numerous issues of fraud and misconduct”

“Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”…Kevin Shipp

“I don’t think it’s just confined to Philadelphia,” he said, adding his “instincts” tell him election fraud is taking place in other cities like Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Las Vegas.

“Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment I know how they operate,” he said, pointing out Democrats control the political apparatus that counts the votes, the polling places, and the people who count the votes. “It’s a time-honored tradition” he said of Democratic election fraud.”…Rod Blagojevich, NewsMax Nov 6, 2020

“Michigan voter rolls ripe for fraud, Voter registrations exceed eligible voters, Explains 67% voter participation, Explains deceased voting”…Citizen Wells Nov 9, 2020

 

From

CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr.,

vs

CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION 
COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in
her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE 
CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of
the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; 
CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official
capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE
COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY
BOARD OF CANVASSERS,

November 8, 2020.

“COMPLAINT
NOW COMES the above-named Plaintiffs, CHERYL A. COSTANTINO AND EDWARD P. MCCALL, JR. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through their attorneys, GREAT LAKES JUSTICE CENTER, and for their Complaint hereby states as follows:”

3. In summary, this Complaint raises numerous instances of fraud, including, but not limited to:
a. Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted.
b. Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.
c. After election officials announced the last absentee ballots had been received,
another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and apparently every ballot was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates.
d. Defendants instructed election workers to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.
e. Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.
f. On a daily basis leading up to the election, City of Detroit election workers and employees coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These
workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.
g. Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.
h. Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their
processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.
i. After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed.
j. Defendant election officials and workers allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact, election officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from
observing. Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.”

Read more:

https://townsquare.media/site/656/files/2020/11/election-crimes-lawsuit.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Donald Trump v Kathy Boockvar Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth, Nov 9, 2020, 2 counties processed 682479 ballots without review, Advantaged voters in Democratic heavy counties 

Donald Trump v Kathy Boockvar Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth, Nov 9, 2020, 2 counties processed 682479 ballots without review, Advantaged voters in Democratic heavy counties

“Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”…Kevin Shipp

“I don’t think it’s just confined to Philadelphia,” he said, adding his “instincts” tell him election fraud is taking place in other cities like Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Las Vegas.

“Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment I know how they operate,” he said, pointing out Democrats control the political apparatus that counts the votes, the polling places, and the people who count the votes. “It’s a time-honored tradition” he said of Democratic election fraud.”…Rod Blagojevich, NewsMax Nov 6, 2020

 

From Donald Trump v Kathy Boockvar Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth, et al November 9, 2020.

4. Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties alone received and processed
682,479 mail-in and absentee ballots without review by the political parties and
candidates. These are unprecedented numbers in Pennsylvania’s elections history. Rather than engaging in an open and transparent process to give credibility to Pennsylvania’s brand-new voting system, the processes were hidden during the receipt, review, opening, and tabulation of those 682,479 votes in direct contravention of the Election Code.
5. Allegheny and Pennsylvania counties conducted the canvassing and
tabulation in convention center rooms and placed observers far away from the action. In the case of Philadelphia County, when an emergency order was issued requiring them to provide meaningful access to representatives, Philadelphia failed to comply.
6. Worse, Democratic-heavy counties violated the mandates of the
Election Code and the determinations of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court,
advantaging voters in Democratic-heavy counties as compared to those in
Republican-heavy counties. Democratic-heavy counties engaged in pre-canvass
activities prior to November 3, 2020, by reviewing received mail-in ballots for
deficiencies, such as lacking the inner secrecy envelope or lacking a signature of the elector on the outer declaration envelope. Those offending Counties then would notify those voters in order to allow them to cure their ballot deficiencies by voting provisionally on Election Day or cancelling their previously mailed ballot and issuing a replacement. In other words, those counties provided their mail-in voters with the opportunity to cure mail-in and absentee ballot deficiencies, while Republican-heavy counties followed the law and did not provide a notice and cure process, disenfranchising those that themselves complied with the Election Code to case legal votes.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/2020-11-09-complaint-as-filed.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

Michigan voter rolls ripe for fraud, Voter registrations exceed eligible voters, Explains 67% voter participation, Explains deceased voting

Michigan voter rolls ripe for fraud, Voter registrations exceed eligible voters, Explains 67% voter participation, Explains deceased voting

“Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”…Kevin Shipp

“Judicial Watch Finds Millions of ‘Extra’ Registrants on Voting Rolls – Warns California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Colorado, Virginia to Clean Up Voting Rolls or Face a Federal Lawsuit”…Jan 2, 2020

“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”…Jesus, John 8:32

 

Michigan’s voter participation rate in the 2020 election is 67%.

That raised red flags.

Michigan has a population of 10 million.

And 8,128,934 registered voters.

NC has a population of 10.5 million and 7 million registered voters.

See a problem?

Not purging voter rolls of deceased or moved voters facilitates voter fraud.

President Trump’s legal team has already been finding examples of deceased voting.

Judicial Watch has been on the forefront of exposing state election boards not purging their  rolls.

They have filed numerous lawsuits.

From Judicial Watch October 16, 2020.

“STATES AND COUNTIES WITH REGISTRATION RATES EXCEEDING 100%”

“*Michigan: Statewide (105%); Leelanau County (119%); Otsego County (118%); Antrim County (116%); Kalkaska County (115%); Emmet County (114%); Berrien County (114%); Keweenaw County (114%); Benzie County (113%); Washtenaw County (113%); Mackinac County (112%); Dickinson County (112%); Roscommon County (112%); Charlevoix County (112%); Grand Traverse County (111%); Oakland County (110%); Iron County (110%); Monroe County (109%); Genesee County (109%); Ontonagon County (109%); Gogebic County (109%); Livingston County (109%); Alcona County (108%); Cass County (108%); Allegan County (108%); Oceana County (107%); Midland County (107%); Kent County (107%); Montmorency County (107%); Van Buren County (107%); Wayne County (107%); Schoolcraft County (107%); Mason County (107%); Oscoda County (107%); Iosco County (107%); Wexford County (106%); Presque Isle County (106%); Delta County (106%); Alpena County (106%); St Clair County (106%); Cheboygan County (105%); Newaygo County (105%); Barry County (105%); Gladwin County (105%); Menominee County (105%); Crawford County (105%); Muskegon County (105%); Kalamazoo County (104%); St. Joseph County (104%); Ottawa County (103%); Clinton County (103%); Saginaw County (103%); Manistee County (103%); Lapeer County (103%); Calhoun County (103%); Ogemaw County (103%); Macomb County (103%); Missaukee County (102%); Eaton County (102%); Shiawassee County (102%); Huron County (102%); Lenawee County (101%); Branch County (101%); Osceola County (101%); Clare County (100%); Arenac County (100%); Bay County (100%); Lake County (100%)”

https://www.judicialwatch.org/tom-fittons-weekly-update/judicial-watch-study/

From Fox News June 9, 2020.

“Lawsuit claims Michigan risks fraud, as county has more registered voters than people who can vote

A voter filed a lawsuit Tuesday against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Bureau of Elections Director Jonathan Brater and other officials, claiming that in at least 16 counties voter rolls have not been properly maintained and that this leaves them vulnerable to fraud in November’s election.

Tony Daunt, a Republican active in his state and county parties, alleges that the Michigan voter registration rates in these counties are “suspiciously high” because their voting records have not been cleaned out to remove ineligible voters, including those who have died, moved, or been convicted of felonies.”

Read more:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-claims-michigan-risks-fraud-as-county-has-more-registered-voters-than-people-who-can-vote

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

“the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid.””...Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman

“estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” …Wisconsin GOP

“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”…Jesus, John 8:32

 

From The Wisconsin Elections Commission November 4, 2020.

“Madison, WI – Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official, issued the following statement:

“Wisconsin’s counting and reporting of unofficial results has gone according to law. Our municipal and county clerks have worked tirelessly throughout the night to make sure every valid ballot is counted and reported accurately.”

https://elections.wi.gov/node/7231

We now know that is a lie!

From JustTheNews November 8, 2020.

“The Constitution allows only for state legislatures to change the ways elections are conducted, but memos show Wisconsin election supervisors made three substantial changes in 2020 that impact potentially tens of thousands of ballots in a battleground state that Joe Biden won by just 20,000.

Records reviewed by Just the News show that an executive branch agency called the Wisconsin Election Commission:

  • permitted local county election clerks to cure spoiled ballots by filling in missing addresses for witnesses even though state law invalidates any ballot without a witness address.
  • exempted as many as 200,000 citizens from voter ID rules by allowing them to claim the COVID-19 pandemic caused them to be “indefinitely confined.”
  • failed to purge 130,000 names from outdated voter rolls as required by law.

The question now is whether those changes  — in particular the instructions allowing clerks to cure ballots with missing information — will open the door for the courts to intervene as President Trump looks to contest ballot practices in multiple battleground states. The Trump campaign is seeking a recount in Wisconsin.”

“Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, told local radio station 1130 WISN this week that the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid. That ballot is not valid.” The Dan O’Donnell Show, meanwhile, claimed that the Wisconsin GOP “estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” ”

Read more:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/many-200000-wisconsin-residents-may-have-voted-absentee-without-having

The Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe have no credibility.

The Margin of victory at this juncture is approx. a 20k lead for Biden.

President Trump has already requested a recount.

Next let’s look at the voter turnout percentages in Wisconsin.

There were not more votes than registered voters as some reports alleged.

There are approx. 3.7 registered voters in Wisconsin.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.7 you get 89 %.

A very high turnout rate and a red flag.

But wait, you are once again not being given the truth.

From the Star Tribune September 29, 2020.

“The Wisconsin Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether to go along with conservatives who argue that 130,000 voters should be removed from the rolls in the hotly contested presidential battleground state, while the Democratic attorney general defended not purging them.

The Wisconsin case is one of several lawsuits across the country, many in battleground states, that seek to purge voters from registration rolls. It is being closely watched because President Donald Trump won the swing state by fewer than 23,000 votes in 2016. However, the lawsuit was unlikely to be resolved by the state Supreme Court before the Nov. 3 election just five weeks away.

Justices on the court controlled 4-3 by conservatives gave little indication during the hour-long oral arguments how they were leaning.

The Wisconsin case hinges on whether voters who were identified as potentially having moved should be removed from the voter registration database. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative law firm, argued that the state elections commission broke the law when it did not remove voters from the rolls who did not respond within 30 days to a mailing last year indicating they had been identified as someone who potentially moved.”

Read more:

https://www.startribune.com/voter-purge-case-before-wisconsin-supreme-court/572571142/

Now let’s take the 3,684,726  registered voters including the number that was not active and subtract the inactive number 130,000 and we get 3.5 million.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.5 you get 94 %.

A definite red flag.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Hunter Biden laptop timeline incriminates FBI casts doubt on Attorney General Barr integrity, FBI withheld data from impeachment and lied to Senator Johnson committee

Hunter Biden laptop timeline incriminates FBI casts doubt on Attorney General Barr integrity, FBI withheld data from impeachment and lied to Senator Johnson committee

“I have heard Joe Biden say he has never discussed his dealings with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden,”…Tony Bobulinski 

“I’m making this statement to set the record straight about the involvement of the Biden family, Vice President Biden, his brother Jim Biden, and his son Hunter Biden in dealings with the Chinese.”,,,Tony Bobulinski

“It is clear the Chinese want Joe Biden to win. They have plenty of blackmail material to continue influencing (controlling) him.”…Citizen Wells

 

The attorney for John Paul Mac Isaac, the Delaware computer repairman who turned in Hunter Biden’s laptop and hard drive to the FBI, has provided a detailed timeline of events.

From Attorney Brian Della Rocca.

“Statement of Attorney Brian Della Rocca:

I represent John Paul Mac Isaac, the Mac repair shop owner in Wilmington, Delaware who unwittingly became the target of a smear campaign by doing what he thought was right. John Paul is not a right-wing fanatic nor is he a Russian hacker.

By way of background, John Paul has owned his shop for over ten years now. Prior to that, John Paul was the “Lead Genius” at the Apple Store in Littleton, Colorado and New Castle, Delaware. Once, while employed by Apple, he found himself in a situation where, while fixing a customer’s iMac, he came across seemingly illegal material. He followed protocol and contacted the authorities. No one questioned John Paul’s ethics then.

Fast-forward to April 12, 2019 when a man claiming to be Hunter Biden walked into his shop. While John Paul was pleased that someone of Hunter Biden’s notoriety was in his shop, he didnot question why Hunter Biden was there. In fact, Hunter Biden had been referred to John Paul’s shop. John Paul is well respected in the community and it would not have been uncommon for his patrons to refer others to his shop. John Paul provided a solution for one of Hunter Biden’s three laptops on the spot. Another laptop was a complete write-off but the third laptop required more significant intervention. That laptop remained in the shop with John Paul. Hunter Biden returned two days later with an external hard drive to which John Paul would transfer the information.

According to John Paul, recovering the data was difficult because of the significant liquid damage to the drive. He would boot the computer and transfer as much as he could before the computer shut down. Then, he would boot up the computer again, verify what was copied, and then transfer more data until the computer shut down again. This process repeated several times. During this process, John Paul saw certain pieces of information but, at the time, he did
not think anything of it. Instead, John Paul completed the work and contacted Hunter Biden to let him know. Hunter Biden never responded. As requested by Hunter Biden, a secure payment request was sent in an email but was never paid. John Paul contacted him at least one more time but Hunter Biden never responded. The policy of the shop is that items not picked up within 90
days of the completion of the services will be treated as abandoned property.

Around mid-July of 2019, news of Hunter Biden’s business dealings with the Ukraine were coming more into focus and John Paul started to get uncomfortable with the information he had seen. He was unsure if the hard drive contained information pertinent to the legal investigation. At that point, he reached out to his father, a retired Colonel in the U.S. Air Force, for advice
about what he should do. They both decided that going to the FBI and handing over the Mac and the drive was their best course of action. Soon thereafter, John Paul’s father took a copy of the hard drive to an FBI field office in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The FBI turned John Paul’s father away.

Then, in mid-October of 2019, an FBI Agent reached out to Colonel Mac Isaac and wanted to discuss the Mac and drive. At that point, Colonel Mac Isaac passed along John Paul’s contact information. The FBI then reached out to John Paul and met him at his house to discuss John Paul’s concerns. On December 9, 2019, the FBI served a Subpoena on John Paul for the computer, the hard drive, and all related paperwork. He willingly gave it to the FBI and was happy to see it go.

Out of an abundance of caution, John Paul made a copy of the drive in case he was ever thrown under the bus as a result of what he knew. As John Paul watched the impeachment trial, he wondered why there was no reference to the information he had provided to the FBI. As a result, starting in February of 2020 and until July of 2020, John Paul reached out to several members of Congress to notify them of what he had in his possession. His requests fell on deaf ears.

Out of frustration, in the beginning of September, John Paul reached out to someone he thought would be able to provide the information directly to the President. That person was Rudy Giuliani. A day after John Paul reached out to Giuliani’s office, Robert Costello, Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, contacted John Paul to discuss the information and John Paul’s concerns.

On September 24, 2020, John Paul then submitted information about the drive to Senator Ron Johnson through the whistleblower link on Senator Johnson’s website. After that submission and while Giuliani’s office was still trying to verify the information, Senator Johnson released the senate report on the Biden business dealings. As we all know, prior to the New York Post’s exposé, rumors began to circulate about the existence of Hunter Biden’s laptop. Those rumors
did not start with John Paul. We believe, due to the timing of the rumors, that the information may have been leaked by Senator Johnson’s office. Then, when Rudy Giuliani released the information to the New York Post, that is when John Paul’s life as a respected part of the Wilmington, Delaware community changed.”

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-10/DellaRoccaStatementtoJTN.pdf

Condensed timeline with relevance:

  1. The Albuquerque FBI rejected Hunter Biden’s laptop in July 2019. The son of former VP Biden, with political aspirations who was already associated with shady activities. The offer was made by a retired colonel. Incompetence or more anti Trump bias from the FBI?
  2. ” mid-October of 2019, an FBI Agent reached out to Colonel Mac Isaac” John Paul’s contact information provided.
  3. December 9, 2019 FBI subpoena gave them possession of the computer and hard drive.
  4. February – July 2020 John Paul reached out to several members of Congress and was ignored.
  5. Early September 2020 John Paul reached out to Rudy Giuliani and his attorney Robert Costello.
  6. ” September 24, 2020, John Paul then submitted information about the drive to Senator Ron Johnson through the whistleblower link”
  7. On September 24, 2020 Senators Johnson and Grassley released the following report: “ Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and RelatedConcerns”

It is abundantly clear from the timeline above that the FBI had every opportunity to provide information that likely would have stopped the President Trump Impeachment in its tracks.

Furthermore,

The FBI apparently lied to Senate Committees in March 2020.

Senator Ron Johnson of the Homeland Security Committee sent a letter to FBI Director Wray on October 17, 2020.

He requested information about the Hunter Biden laptop.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/18/hunter-biden-computer-update-october-17-2020-ron-johnson-letter-to-wray-whistleblower-contacted-does-the-fbi-possess-material-from-hunter-bidens-laptops/

From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:

After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:

“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”

So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/25/fbi-hunter-biden-laptop-smoking-gun-from-march-2020-staff-briefing-to-senate-committees-did-not-have-any-additional-information-to-provide/

The corrupt FBI is clearly guilty of withholding information from the government and American People.

Attorney General Barr bears some responsibility.

Was he aware of the Hunter Biden laptop?

Consider this March 4, 2020 statement by Senator Johnson:

“And if I were a Democrat primary voter, I’d want these questions satisfactorily answered before I cast my final vote.”

How prophetic!

“Change my vote.”

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

FBI interfered in 2020 election by withholding Hunter Biden laptop, USDOJ still very corrupt by March 2020, Timely release likely would have affected Biden’s nomination

FBI interfered in 2020 election by withholding Hunter Biden laptop, USDOJ still very corrupt by March 2020, Timely release likely would have affected Biden’s nomination

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell 

“We know truth of something being falsely stated to public”...FBI General Flynn notes January 25, 2017

“FBI Is Stonewalling Congressional Oversight On Hunter Biden”…The Federalist October 8, 2020

 

Fact: The Obama Justice Department and FBI that President Trump inherited was corrupt.

Fact: The Hunter Biden laptop was in the possession of the FBI in December 2019.

Fact: If the data from the laptop had been made available to Congress, it is likely the impeachment of President Trump would have been stopped in its tracks.

Fact: If the data from the laptop had been provided to Senate committees by March 2020, it is likely that Joe Biden would not have received the Democrat nomination.

The FBI interfered in the 2020 election!

From Citizen Wells October 25, 2020.

“From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:

Hunter Biden, Burisma,
and Corruption:
The Impact on U.S.
Government Policy and
Related Concerns

September 23, 2020.

“On July 16, mere days before the Democrats’ July 13 letter became public, Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden wrote to the Chairmen to request a briefing from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and other relevant members of the IC on matters related to the Committees’ investigation.233 On July 28, 2020, the Chairmen responded to the Ranking
Members and reminded them that in March 2020, the FBI and relevant members of the IC had briefed the Committees regarding the investigation and provided assurances at that time that there was no reason that the Committees should not continue their investigation.”

July 28, 2020 Letter:

“We write in response to your July 16, 2020 letter, which “reiterate[s]” a request for a member briefing from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and relevant members of the Intelligence Community (IC). As you are fully aware, the FBI advised all of us during a March 2020 staff briefing that there was nothing to preclude the continuation of our investigation.
Nevertheless, HSGAC Majority and Minority requested a member briefing from these agencies months ago. Those agencies made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide and that the relevant written products members have had access to for months speak for themselves.”

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07-28%20RHJ-CEG%20Letter%20to%20Peters-Wyden%20%28Defensive%20Briefing%29.pdf

After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:

“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”

So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/25/fbi-hunter-biden-laptop-smoking-gun-from-march-2020-staff-briefing-to-senate-committees-did-not-have-any-additional-information-to-provide/

From Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020.

“A couple of weeks ago I noticed that the FBI’s FOIA letters were no longer signed by Section Chief David M. Hardy, but by Acting Section Chief Michael G. Seidel. What happened to Mr. Hardy? You may recall that Mr. Hardy filed a sworn declaration in 2018 claiming that the FBI searched its files and located no records about Seth Rich.

In September of 2019, however, Judicial Watch obtained an email string about Seth Rich in response to a FOIA request for communications between FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and in March of 2020 former U.S. Attorney Deborah Sines testified that the FBI had investigated Seth Rich’s laptop and his online accounts. In other words, Mr. Hardy’s testimony was false.

I repeatedly asked U.S. Attorney John Durham and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate whether Mr. Hardy lied under oath, and in an April 22, 2020 letter Mr. Horowitz wrote that he referred my complaint to the FBI’s Inspection Division. Was Mr. Hardy forced out? I don’t know, but if you have any inside information, please send it my way.”

https://lawflog.com/?p=2355

The withholding of evidence was so bad in the General Michael Flynn case that Attorney General Barr stepped in and appointed a special investigator.

“Beginning in January 2020, at the direction of Attorney General William P. Barr, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri (“USA EDMO”) has been conducting a review of the Michael T. Flynn investigation. The review by USA EDMO has involved the analysis of reports related to the investigation along with communications and notes by Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) personnel associated with the investigation.

The enclosed documents were obtained and analyzed by USA EDMO in March and April 2020 and are provided to you as a result of this ongoing review; additional documents may be forthcoming. These materials are covered by the Protective Order entered by the Court on February 21, 2018.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.180.1.pdf

The Justice Dept. has continued to find “hidden” exculpatory information in the Flynn case and filed it as late as late September.

So what happened to David M. Hardy, the former FBI FOIA chief?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FBI Hunter Biden laptop smoking gun from March 2020 staff briefing to Senate committees, “did not have any additional information to provide”

FBI Hunter Biden laptop smoking gun from March 2020 staff briefing to Senate committees, “did not have any additional information to provide”

“I have heard Joe Biden say he has never discussed his dealings with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden,”…Tony Bobulinski 

“I’m making this statement to set the record straight about the involvement of the Biden family, Vice President Biden, his brother Jim Biden, and his son Hunter Biden in dealings with the Chinese.”,,,Tony Bobulinski

“It is clear the Chinese want Joe Biden to win. They have plenty of blackmail material to continue influencing (controlling) him.”…Citizen Wells

 

The FBI has admitted that they took possession of Hunter Biden’s laptop in December 2019.

From a October 22, 2020 filing by the US Justice Dept. in the General Flynn case we know the following:

“The Federal Bureau of Investigation has a well-documented record management program and retention plan that provides specific instructions for the collection of information, the maintenance of documents, and the retention or disposal of documents.”

“SENTINEL, which is the FBI’s electronic records management system for all criminal and intelligence gathering activities:

SENTINEL provides FBI employees the ability to create case
documents and submit them through an electronic workflow
process. Supervisors, reviewers, and others involved in the approval
process can review, comment, and approve the insertion of
documents into the appropriate FBI electronic case files. Upon
approval, the SENTINEL system serializes and uploads the
documents into the SENTINEL repositories, where the document
becomes part of the official FBI case file. SENTINEL maintains an
auditable record of all transactions.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.305.0.pdf

Upon receipt of the Hunter Biden laptop, regardless of what investigation it was for, information regarding the laptop, and certainly the owner name should have been entered in the Sentinel system.

From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:

Hunter Biden, Burisma,
and Corruption:
The Impact on U.S.
Government Policy and
Related Concerns

September 23, 2020.

“On July 16, mere days before the Democrats’ July 13 letter became public, Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden wrote to the Chairmen to request a briefing from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and other relevant members of the IC on matters related to the Committees’ investigation.233 On July 28, 2020, the Chairmen responded to the Ranking
Members and reminded them that in March 2020, the FBI and relevant members of the IC had briefed the Committees regarding the investigation and provided assurances at that time that there was no reason that the Committees should not continue their investigation.”

July 28, 2020 Letter:

“We write in response to your July 16, 2020 letter, which “reiterate[s]” a request for a member briefing from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and relevant members of the Intelligence Community (IC). As you are fully aware, the FBI advised all of us during a March 2020 staff briefing that there was nothing to preclude the continuation of our investigation.
Nevertheless, HSGAC Majority and Minority requested a member briefing from these agencies months ago. Those agencies made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide and that the relevant written products members have had access to for months speak for themselves.”

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07-28%20RHJ-CEG%20Letter%20to%20Peters-Wyden%20%28Defensive%20Briefing%29.pdf

After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:

“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”

So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/