FBI interfered in 2020 election by withholding Hunter Biden laptop, USDOJ still very corrupt by March 2020, Timely release likely would have affected Biden’s nomination
“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“We know truth of something being falsely stated to public”...FBI General Flynn notes January 25, 2017
“FBI Is Stonewalling Congressional Oversight On Hunter Biden”…The Federalist October 8, 2020
Fact: The Obama Justice Department and FBI that President Trump inherited was corrupt.
Fact: The Hunter Biden laptop was in the possession of the FBI in December 2019.
Fact: If the data from the laptop had been made available to Congress, it is likely the impeachment of President Trump would have been stopped in its tracks.
Fact: If the data from the laptop had been provided to Senate committees by March 2020, it is likely that Joe Biden would not have received the Democrat nomination.
The FBI interfered in the 2020 election!
From Citizen Wells October 25, 2020.
“From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:
Hunter Biden, Burisma,
and Corruption:
The Impact on U.S.
Government Policy and
Related Concerns
September 23, 2020.
“On July 16, mere days before the Democrats’ July 13 letter became public, Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden wrote to the Chairmen to request a briefing from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and other relevant members of the IC on matters related to the Committees’ investigation.233 On July 28, 2020, the Chairmen responded to the Ranking
Members and reminded them that in March 2020, the FBI and relevant members of the IC had briefed the Committees regarding the investigation and provided assurances at that time that there was no reason that the Committees should not continue their investigation.”
July 28, 2020 Letter:
“We write in response to your July 16, 2020 letter, which “reiterate[s]” a request for a member briefing from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and relevant members of the Intelligence Community (IC). As you are fully aware, the FBI advised all of us during a March 2020 staff briefing that there was nothing to preclude the continuation of our investigation.
Nevertheless, HSGAC Majority and Minority requested a member briefing from these agencies months ago. Those agencies made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide and that the relevant written products members have had access to for months speak for themselves.”
After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:
“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”
So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?”
From Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020.
“A couple of weeks ago I noticed that the FBI’s FOIA letters were no longer signed by Section Chief David M. Hardy, but by Acting Section Chief Michael G. Seidel. What happened to Mr. Hardy? You may recall that Mr. Hardy filed a sworn declaration in 2018 claiming that the FBI searched its files and located no records about Seth Rich.
In September of 2019, however, Judicial Watch obtained an email string about Seth Rich in response to a FOIA request for communications between FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and in March of 2020 former U.S. Attorney Deborah Sines testified that the FBI had investigated Seth Rich’s laptop and his online accounts. In other words, Mr. Hardy’s testimony was false.
I repeatedly asked U.S. Attorney John Durham and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate whether Mr. Hardy lied under oath, and in an April 22, 2020 letter Mr. Horowitz wrote that he referred my complaint to the FBI’s Inspection Division. Was Mr. Hardy forced out? I don’t know, but if you have any inside information, please send it my way.”
The withholding of evidence was so bad in the General Michael Flynn case that Attorney General Barr stepped in and appointed a special investigator.
“Beginning in January 2020, at the direction of Attorney General William P. Barr, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri (“USA EDMO”) has been conducting a review of the Michael T. Flynn investigation. The review by USA EDMO has involved the analysis of reports related to the investigation along with communications and notes by Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) personnel associated with the investigation.
The enclosed documents were obtained and analyzed by USA EDMO in March and April 2020 and are provided to you as a result of this ongoing review; additional documents may be forthcoming. These materials are covered by the Protective Order entered by the Court on February 21, 2018.”
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.180.1.pdf
The Justice Dept. has continued to find “hidden” exculpatory information in the Flynn case and filed it as late as late September.
So what happened to David M. Hardy, the former FBI FOIA chief?
More here:
Citizen WElls 
“EXCLUSIVE: FBI Is Stonewalling Congressional Oversight On Hunter Biden
OCTOBER 8, 2020 By Tristan Justice
The FBI is refusing to provide answers to a congressional inquiry pertaining to Hunter Biden’s potentially criminal overseas business activity revealed in a Senate report last month that chronicles the Biden family’s conflicts of interest abroad.”
https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/08/exclusive-fbi-is-stonewalling-congressional-oversight-on-hunter-biden/
CW…….
………Gina Haspel is the person blocking the release of pertinent documents which relate to the activities of the Biden crime family.
AND,
…….in 1929 there was lots of millionaires…….unfortunately for them they were millionaires ON PAPER ONLY. When the stock market crash began many jumped out of their 50th floor PENTHOUSE windows after they began to lose their LAST MILLION DOLLARS. Everything they allegedly owned was bought on credit, and not yet paid for……including their holdings in the stock market. CREDIT, CREDIT, CREDIT…….PAY LATER !!!!!!!!……soon comes monetary collapse. REPEAT PERFORMANCE MAY BE COMING !!!!!!
https://twitter .com/JackPosobiec/status/1320382925163069440
I broke the link because I don’t know CW’s stance on embedding tweets; you can put it back together to see the story.
Jack Posobiec says that a DOJ informer told OAN that the FBI allegedly dropped an investigation into the Biden laptop because its provenance wouldn’t stand up in court.
That, however, would be irrelevant in what ought to have been a national security counterintelligence investigation (like they opened against Trump) and which also ought to have been briefed to the POTUS as well as the Gang of Eight in real time.
Adam Housley disputes this story, but says he’ll investigate further because he stands behind the computer guy.
It ought to be easy enough for someone with subpoena power, like the FBI, U.S. attorneys, Congressional committees, or the DE state police to verify the laptop ownership based upon the serial number(s), which should be in the possession of both the computer guy and the FBI, maybe even Giuliani and members of Congress that the computer guy contacted, not to mention the manufacturer of the device(s).
When you buy a laptop, the serial number is recorded for identification purposes as well as for the warranty. It’s on all the paperwork you get with the device. Anybody with common sense knows this. The manufacturer of the laptop ought to be able–maybe even without a subpoena because these are their own records–to tell investigators who the original purchaser was.
If it belonged to the Biden foundation, then most large organizations keep inventory of purchased hardware, most likely with serial numbers, including to whom it was issued so they can keep track of their property. The serial number would also be on any invoice where the foundation paid for the laptop.
These records seem even more likely to have been kept when it’s a not-for-profit that doesn’t pay taxes and has to report (I believe) to the government and donors concerning how it spends its money.
So maybe the FBI believes the computer guy let somebody tamper with the laptop and insert information? Even if that happened, the CONTENT is what’s of concern and ought to be investigated as the obvious threat to national security that it represents. The FBI and Mueller had no concern about the provenance of the totally bogus disinformation known as the “Steele dossier.”
The photos and videos on the laptop can be taken at face value. Some emails, especially those of most concern with regard to national security, are already confirmed as accurate by third parties. In any case, those can also be confirmed by the companies used to send/receive the messages.
Thanks Sassy
SCOOP: DOJ source tells
@OANN
that FBI dropped investigation of Hunter Biden laptop because they did not believe the repair shop owner’s story would hold up in court, although Mac Isaac provided them with evidence. They found zero evidence of foreign involvement.
We’re supposed to believe that?????
I am standing behind my reporting.
The FBI did not inform the Senate Committees, Jordan, Johnson, et al about the laptop in March 2020.
Case closed.