Category Archives: Accountability

US and Flynn joint motion to expedite Sept 4, 2020, “The United States and General Flynn agree that this Court should resolve the pending motion to dismiss with dispatch”

Posted on September 5, 2020 | 19 comments

US and Flynn joint motion to expedite Sept 4, 2020, “The United States and General Flynn agree that this Court should resolve the pending motion to dismiss with dispatch”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“her client was “totally set up” because he threatened to expose wrongdoing by top intelligence officials in the Obama administration.

“He was going to audit the intel agencies because he knew about the billions Brennan and company were running off the books,” Powell said, referring to former CIA Director John Brennan.”…Sidney Powell, Vickie McKenna Show

On Judge Sullivan: “if there was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”...Judge Rao dissenting opinion

 

From

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MICHAEL T. FLYNN

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND MOTION TO EXPEDITE
BY THE UNITED STATES AND GENERAL MICHAEL T. FLYNN

September 4, 2020.

“The United States of America and General Michael T. Flynn respectfully file this joint brief court’s minute order. On August 31, the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, denied General Flynn’s petition for a writ of mandamus. See In re Flynn, No. 20-5143, slip op. On September 1, this Court issued a minute order directing the parties “to file a joint status report with a recommendation for further proceedings by no later than September 21, 2020” proposing “a
briefing schedule regarding the deadlines for (1) the government and Mr. Flynn to file any surreply briefs; and (2) the government, Mr. Flynn, and the Court-appointed amicus curiae to file a consolidated response to any amicus brief of non-Court-appointed-amicus curiae.” It is not necessary, however, for this Court to wait until September 21 to proceed with this case. The Court
instead may, and should, set a schedule to resolve this case as soon as possible.

This Court’s minute order observes that, under D.C. Circuit Rule 41(a)(3), the order  denying mandamus relief “will become effective automatically 21 days after issuance”—here, on September 21. This Court, however, need not await the effectiveness of the denial of mandamus to proceed with this case. The pendency of mandamus proceedings in the court of appeals does not, on its own, deprive the district court of its continuing jurisdiction over a case or operate as a
stay of proceedings in the district court. Indeed, in this very case, the Court allowed briefing on the government’s motion to dismiss to continue while General Flynn’s petition for mandamus was pending before the court of appeals panel. See ECF Nos. 211-234. Accordingly, the Court need not wait for the issuance of the court of appeals’ mandate or for the formal termination of appellate court proceedings before deciding the government’s motion to dismiss.

In addition, the D.C. Circuit’s decision indicates that proceeding now is appropriate. In its opinion denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, the D.C. Circuit stated: “As the underlying criminal case resumes in the District Court, we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.” Slip Op. 17-18. The United States and General Flynn agree that this Court
should resolve the pending motion to dismiss with dispatch. It is not necessary to delay further proceedings until September 21, and any delay would harm both the government, which must expend resources on a case that it has determined should be dismissed, and General Flynn, who faces impairments on his liberty and the cloud of a pending prosecution that the Executive Branch
seeks to end.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.238.0_3.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

19 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Court of Appeals, Courts, FBI, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Fake Russian and DNC leak narratives still impede truth in Seth Rich and Flynn cases, Judge Sullivan, DC Appeals Court, FBI, UK, Ellen Ratner stonewall justice

Posted on September 2, 2020 | 24 comments

Fake Russian and DNC leak narratives still impede truth in Seth Rich and Flynn cases, Judge Sullivan, DC Appeals Court, FBI, UK, Ellen Ratner stonewall justice

“Ellen Ratner can confirm that the Saturday before the Election 2016, she met with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for 3 hours. He told her that Russia did not “hack” the DNC, it was from an internal source.”...Ellen Ratner’s attendance at Embry University symposium on November 9, 2016

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

On Judge Sullivan: “if there was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”...Judge Rao dissenting opinion

 

It is coming to a head.

The truth about the fake Russian Narrative and the leak of DNC data during the 2016 election cycle.

The final pieces of the puzzle are in reach.

The dark forces of the Democrat Deep State are resisting with all their might.

The General Michael Flynn case should have already been dismissed.

We know the truth and are waiting on Durham indictments.

In the recent DC Appeal Court decision in the Flynn motion for Writ of Mandamus, 2 non Clinton Obama justices dissented and revealed the impartiality of Judge Sullivan. This also revealed the efforts of the deep state.

Letters Rogatory have been sent to the UK requesting the testimony of Julian Assange in at least 2 Seth Rich cases.

Ellen Ratner, who met with Julian Assange in 2016 and stated that he said the DNC leaks were an inside job, filed a motion under seal to file document(s) under seal. This was after numerous attempts to serve a subpoena on her.

The dark force Democrat Deep State is desperate to stop these revelations before the 2020 election.

They will do anything.

Their mantra: The end justifies the means.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

24 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Court of Appeals, Courts, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , , , ,

Ellen Ratner Sealed  motion for leave to file document under seal Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al, Ratner attorney Charna Sherman filing August 31, 2020 

Posted on September 1, 2020 | 8 comments

Ellen Ratner Sealed  motion for leave to file document under seal Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al, Ratner attorney Charna Sherman filing August 31, 2020

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

“The FBI clearly has records pertaining to Seth Rich, and it has withheld those
records in bad faith.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger October 11, 2019

“Six unsuccessful attempts to serve Ellen Ratner at addresses in California and New York have been made and Defendants have performed several “skip trace” searches attempting to locate Ms. Ratner.”

“Ms. Ratner remains unserved. Defendants have instructed their process server to continue attempting to locate and serve the correct Ellen Ratner. Quainton Decl. Ex. 13. However, counsel for Defendants respectfully requests that permission be given for alternative means of service, such as through social media, since it appears unlikely service will be successful on Ms. Ratner
by conventional means.”…From Aaron Rich v ED Butowsky, et al  May 11, 2020

 

From Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al August 31, 2020.

“SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by ELLEN F. RATNER (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Motion to Quash, # 2 Affidavit Declaration in Support, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit [PROPOSED] ORDER)(Sherman, Charna) (Entered: 08/31/2020)”

“APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
To: The clerk of court and all parties of record
I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

non party Ellen Ratner

/s/ Charna E. Sherman”

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6346852/rich-v-butowsky/?page=2

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

8 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Flynn en banc Mandamus hearing denial Judge Rao dissent exposes Judge Sullivan’s partiality, “whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”

Posted on September 1, 2020 | 5 comments

Flynn en banc Mandamus hearing denial Judge Rao dissent exposes Judge Sullivan’s partiality, “whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“her client was “totally set up” because he threatened to expose wrongdoing by top intelligence officials in the Obama administration.

“He was going to audit the intel agencies because he knew about the billions Brennan and company were running off the books,” Powell said, referring to former CIA Director John Brennan.”…Sidney Powell, Vickie McKenna Show

On Judge Sullivan: “if there was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”...Judge Rao dissenting opinion

 

From the Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rao in the General Michael Flynn hearing for Writ of Mandamus before the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia August 31, 2020.

“The trial judge’s attempted use of Rule 35 is not the first
time he has acted as if he were a party. At his option and with
the appellate court’s approval, Rule 21, as noted earlier, allows
the subject judge to participate in a mandamus proceeding
either directly or by amicus.
5 But Rule 21 leaves no room for
the judge to retain private counsel as was done here. See FED.
R. APP. P. 21(b)(4). A party, not a judge whose action is under
mandamus review, retains private counsel. As the Advisory
Committee Notes on Rule 21(b) make clear, “[b]ecause it is
ordinarily undesirable to place the trial court judge, even
temporarily, in an adversarial posture with a litigant, the rule
permits a court of appeals to invite an amicus curiae to provide
a response to the petition.” FED. R. APP. P. 21(b) advisory
committee’s note to 1996 amendment (first emphasis added).

And his earlier sua sponte appointment of amicus to
oppose the government’s motion to dismiss, although
apparently allowed, is further indication that he has from the
outset appeared to view his role in adjudicating the
government’s motion to dismiss as one that requires outside
support—as if he were a priori antagonistic to the relief both bona fide parties seek.6 Even more telling of apparent
partiality, the trial judge ordered amicus to opine on whether
Flynn had committed perjury and should be held in criminal
contempt. Order Appointing Amicus Curiae at 1, United States
v. Flynn, No. 17-cr-00232 (D.D.C. May 13, 2020), ECF No.
205. That direction indicates that, even if compelled to grant
the motion to dismiss, the trial judge intends to pursue Flynn
on his own.

But it is the trial judge’s conduct since the government’s
May 2020 motion to dismiss, weighed in light of his earlier
conduct, that delivers the coup de grâce to the last shred of the
trial judge’s appearance of impartiality. In other words, if there
was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the
appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone. Granted, the panel
majority opinion resisted Flynn’s request that a different judge
be assigned to this case. See In re Flynn, 961 F.3d at 1223.
That decision rested primarily on the fact that Flynn’s request
centered on the trial judge’s in-court statements, which are
almost always insufficient on their own to warrant
reassignment, and the fact that the trial judge was simply
directed to grant the government’s motion to dismiss. See id.
But the trial judge’s “extreme” conduct throughout this case,
culminating in his decision to ignore the writ and instead seek
en banc review, demonstrates a “clear inability to render fair
judgment.””

““Unbiased, impartial adjudicators are the cornerstone of
any system of justice worthy of the label.” In re Al-Nashiri,
921 F.3d at 233–34. If the trial judge continues to preside over
this case, I submit our system is not so worthy because his
conduct has undermined the appearance of impartiality. My
colleagues in the majority disagree and I am frankly dismayed
by their endorsement of the trial judge’s conduct, especially
after the government’s motion to dismiss. Granted, all
members of the en banc court weigh that conduct in light of
their own experience and notions of impartiality, while, at the
same time, applying § 455(a)’s “objective” standard of “a
reasonable and informed observer.” Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d
at 114. Although, for them, the exact tipping point at which
the appearance of impartiality is lost is unknown, I am certain
that such a point exists and that the trial judge has passed it. To
protect Flynn’s rights as a criminal defendant, the
government’s interest in controlling its prosecution and the
integrity of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,9 I believe the trial judge, by his conduct manifesting
the appearance of glaring partiality, has disqualified himself. I
would order the reassignment of this case to a different trial
judge for dismissal.”

Read more:

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/777940F1C81FD47E852585D5005DADCB/$file/20-5143.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, FBI, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Seth Rich murder and DNC leak involvement, Fox News et al silenced by Obama and Democrat attorneys, 4 prominent lawsuits drag on, Expert witnesses to testify?, Truth emerging?

Posted on August 31, 2020 | 2 comments

Seth Rich murder and DNC leak involvement, Fox News et al silenced by Obama and Democrat attorneys, 4 prominent lawsuits drag on, Expert witnesses to testify?, Truth emerging?

“We can prove, that all the data that Wikileaks published from the DNC, that was downloaded on the 23rd and 25th of May, and also the 26th of August of 2016; all of that carried the signatures of being downloaded to a thumb drive or a CD-ROM, and physically transported,”...William Binney

“we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich.” “Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness”…Jack Burkman

“Ellen Ratner can confirm that the Saturday before the Election 2016, she met with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for 3 hours. He told her that Russia did not “hack” the DNC, it was from an internal source.”...Ellen Ratner’s attendance at Embry University symposium on November 9, 2016

 

Seth Rich was murdered July 10, 2016.

WikiLeaks began publishing 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from top DNC officials on July 22, 2016.

Obama, Joe Biden and top Obama Admin. officials met in the White House in January 2017 to discuss General Michael Flynn.

We now know the only collusion regarding the DNC leaks was between the Obama Admin., Justice Dept. and other government entities.

We still do not know who murdered Seth Rich and who leaked the DNC documents.

There are 4 prominent lawsuits regarding Seth Rich that are still ongoing.

Joel Rich and Mary Rich v Fox News Network, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.490098/gov.uscourts.nysd.490098.1.0.pdf

Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky, et

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6346852/rich-v-butowsky/?page=1

Ed Butowsky v David Folkenflik NPR, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7244731/butowsky-v-folkenflik/

Edward Butowsky v Michael Gottlieb, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14681570/butowsky-v-gottlieb/?page=1

In recent months journalist Ellen Ratner, who met with Julian Assange and announced on video that the DNC leak was done by an insider, had numerous subpoena attempts made on her.

Testimony from Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison in the UK has been requested in multiple cases.

On August 27, 2020 expert witnesses were designated by the defense in Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/08/30/seth-rich-expert-witnesses-filed-by-defendants-butowsky-et-al-william-binney-and-frank-whalen-aaron-rich-v-butowsky-et-al-feces-to-hit-fan/

If you are wondering why you are so uninformed regarding Seth Rich, Julian Assange etc. it is because the largest new organization that would otherwise be covering all of this, Fox News, has effectively been silenced by lawsuits.

So why have so many resources been gathered and employed to silence journalists?

From Gateway Pundit May 25, 2018.

“Obama Admin Attorneys Team with Seth Rich’s Brother – Sue Private Eye Team Investigating Seth Rich

A team of private eyes investigating the death of Seth Rich are facing two major lawsuits prosecuted by high-powered Democratic establishment attorneys for uncovering evidence that insinuates the slain DNC staffer’s murder was politically motivated.

Aaron Rich, the brother of Seth Rich, filed a lawsuit in April in US District Court in the District of Columbia, against America First Media accusing conservative activist Matt Couch and other individuals and media organizations for peddling “false and unfounded claims” about him and acting “with reckless disregard for the truth.”

The lawyer representing Aaron Rich, Michael J. Gottlieb, recently concluded four years of service with the Obama Administration.

He served as Special Assistant to the President and Associate White House Counsel from 2009- 2010, where he focused on national security law and judicial nominations.”

“A second attorney prosecuting Aaron Rich’s case is David Boies, chairman of the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner. Boies has been involved in various high-profile cases in the United States, including United States v. Microsoft Corp., Bush v. Gore and the defense of Harvey Weinstein against sexual abuse allegations.

In an interview with The Gateway Pundit, Matt Couch questioned how Rich, whose family couldn’t afford a private investigator, is able to afford the high powered legal team comprised of Obama’s White House counsel.

“This is who Aaron Rich gets to represent against our team – can you imagine what it would charge to hire Harvey Weinstein’s defense lawyer?  I don’t know how Rich hired these attorneys – the Rich family couldn’t even afford a private investigator, that’s why Ed Butowski offered to pay for Rod Wheeler,” he said. “But now they can afford the most expensive and powerful Democratic law firms in the country – how does that happen?”

The suit is the Democratic establishment’s attempt to stifle independent investigations, Couch argued,  because if the DNC truly wanted justice for Rich they would have offered reward money to find Rich’s killers and would have availed its server to the FBI after the alleged hack.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/obama-admin-attorneys-team-with-seth-richs-brother-sue-private-eye-team-investigating-seth-rich/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

2 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Crime, Defense, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Internet attacks, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , , ,

Seth Rich expert witnesses filed by defendants Butowsky et al, William Binney and Frank Whalen, Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al, Feces to hit fan?

Posted on August 30, 2020 | 6 comments

Seth Rich expert witnesses filed by defendants Butowsky et al, William Binney and Frank Whalen, Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al, Feces to hit fan?

“We can prove, that all the data that Wikileaks published from the DNC, that was downloaded on the 23rd and 25th of May, and also the 26th of August of 2016; all of that carried the signatures of being downloaded to a thumb drive or a CD-ROM, and physically transported,”...William Binney

“we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich.” “Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness”…Jack Burkman

“Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the FBI’s claims that (1) it did not investigate matters pertaining to Mr. Rich; (2) it did not examine his computer; and (3) it conducted a “reasonable” search but could not locate any records or communications about Mr. Rich. Specifically, Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the affidavit testimony of FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger March 29, 2020

 

From Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky et al  August 27, 2020.

“DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED EXPERT DESIGNATIONS

Defendants Edward Butowsky and Matthew Couch designate the following individuals as experts whose testimony is expected to cover the following topics:
1. Larry Johnson – Construction of intelligence narratives/analytical and logical
flaws in the Russian military intelligence DNC hacking narrative.
2. William Binney – Forensic analysis of DNC Wikileaks email metadata and
disproof of Russian remote hacking theory.
3. Frank Whalen – Law enforcement homicide procedures and investigative
obstruction.
4. Yakov Apelbaum – Digital evidence analysis of electronic communication use
and manipulation; root cause analysis of DNC hack.
5. John Moynihan – Forensic analysis of financial disclosures/adequacy of
disclosure for purposes of determining source/receipt of funds.
6. Richard Fisher, Fisher & Associates – Analysis and evaluation of
communications related to alleged defamation, conclusions and opinions as to defamation liability and potential impact.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794.236.3.pdf

From Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) March 13, 2019.

“Recent forensic examination of the Wikileaks DNC files shows they were created on 23, 25 and 26 May 2016. (On June 12, Julian Assange announced he had them; WikiLeaks published them on July 22.) We recently discovered that the files reveal a FAT (File Allocation Table) system property. This shows that the data had been transferred to an external storage device, such as a thumb drive, before WikiLeaks posted them.

FAT is a simple file system named for its method of organization, the File Allocation Table. It is used for storage only and is not related to internet transfers like hacking. Were WikiLeaks to have received the DNC files via a hack, the last modified times on the files would be a random mixture of odd-and even-ending numbers.

Why is that important? The evidence lies in the “last modified” time stamps on the Wikileaks files. When a file is stored under the FAT file system the software rounds the time to the nearest even-numbered second. Every single one of the time stamps in the DNC files on WikiLeaks’ site ends in an even number.

We have examined 500 DNC email files stored on the Wikileaks site. All 500 files end in an even number—2, 4, 6, 8 or 0. If those files had been hacked over the Internet, there would be an equal probability of the time stamp ending in an odd number. The random probability that FAT was not used is 1 chance in 2 to the 500th power. Thus, these data show that the DNC emails posted by WikiLeaks went through a storage device, like a thumb drive, and were physically moved before Wikileaks posted the emails on the World Wide Web.

This finding alone is enough to raise reasonable doubts, for example, about Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers for hacking the DNC emails given to WikiLeaks. A defense attorney could easily use the forensics to argue that someone copied the DNC files to a storage device like a USB thumb drive and got them physically to WikiLeaks — not electronically via a hack.”

“For the steering group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity:

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center (ret.)”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2019/04/23/ny-times-mueller-lies-exposed-by-intelligence-professionals-if-not-seth-rich-then-who-dnc-files-transferred-to-thumb-drive-not-hacked-vips/

Frank Whalen:

Experience

  • Monday Properties

    Investigator Pre Employment Screening

    Monday Properties

    2006 – 202014 years

  • Metro Investigative Services

    Owner

    Metro Investigative Services

    Apr 2004 – 2020 16 years

  • NYPD

    Detective Sergeant (Ret.)

    NYPD

    1982 – 2004 22 years

    CO Brooklyn South Homicide Task Force

From Gateway Pundit July 9, 2018.

““We believe that we have reached the beginning of the end of the Seth Rich murder investigation,” Burkman told The Gateway Pundit in an exclusive interview Sunday.  “After two long hard years of work, we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich. One is reportedly a current DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent, the other is reportedly a current ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) agent”

The witness, who “fears for his life,” will be accompanied by armed guards and disguise his identity as he details how two employees of the United States government killed Seth in a press conference slated for Tuesday.

Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness, Burkman explained.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/

Messenger shooters and swamp dwellers beware. These witnesses will testify under oath.

Looks like the feces is going to hit the fan.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Crime, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Fox news, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Biden Obama 2008 presidential campaigns fined over 640k by FEC, Inadequate records excessive contributions illegal contributions, Sloppily run, Want more of this?

Posted on August 29, 2020 | 4 comments

Biden Obama 2008 presidential campaigns fined over 640k by FEC, Inadequate records excessive contributions illegal contributions, Sloppily run, Want more of this?

“According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act. That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn,” ...Attorney Sidney Powell

“Joe Biden “Outraged We Seized Burisma Assets”, Could No Longer Pay His Son…”…Former Ukraine Prosecutor Shokin

“I discovered a pattern of corruption that the Washington press covered up for years! I’m also going to bring out a massive pay-for-play scheme under the Obama Administration that will devastate the Democrat Party. Do you honestly think I’m intimidated?”…Rudy Giuliani

 

Joe Biden brags about his record as Vice President working with Obama.

Their 2008 presidential runs campaign financing and law compliance paints a different picture.

From Citizen Wells and apparently somewhat scrubbed by the FEC, May 25, 2012.

“From the FEC  May 25, 2012.
“ENFORCEMENT”

“MUR 6524

RESPONDENTS: Biden for President, Inc.; and Melvyn Monzack, in his official capacity as treasurer
COMPLAINANT: FEC-Initiated
SUBJECT: In the normal course of carrying out its supervisory responsibilities, the Commission found that Biden for President, Inc. (the Committee) and Monzack, in his official capacity as treasurer, did not retain adequate records to document the notification of contributors of the Committee’s presumptive redesignation of $1,092,899 in excessive contributions. Biden was a 2008 primary candidate for president.

DISPOSITION: The Commission entered into a conciliation agreement whereby Biden for President, Inc. and Monzack, in his official capacity as treasurer, agreed to pay a civil penalty of $50,000.””

https://citizenwells.com/2012/05/25/biden-for-president-fined-50000-by-fec-2008-inadequate-records-over-one-million-dollars-excessive-contributions-melvyn-monzack-treasurer-breaking-news/

The FEC link

https://www.fec.gov/resources/news_releases/2012/20120525digest.shtml

Yields:

<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>

The FEC link to the memo

“http://eqs.nictusa.com/eqsdocsMUR/12044313515.pdf&#8221;

Yields:

This site can’t be reached

eqs.nictusa.com’s server IP address could not be found.

However, it was located on the WayBack Machine.

Click to access 12044313515.pdf

“This matter was initiated by the Federal Election Commission (“Commission*’), pursuantHI12 to infonnation ascertained in the normal course of carrying out its supervisory responsibilities.13 The Commission found reason to believe that Biden for President, Inc. and Melvyn Monzack, in^ 14 his official capacity as Treasurer (collectively “Respondents”), violated 11 C.F.R.® 15 §ll.0.1(l)(4)(ii). ”

From Politico July 17, 2010.

“The Federal Election Commission has penalized Vice President Joe Biden’s 2008 presidential campaign $219,000 for accepting over-the-limit contributions and a discounted flight on a jet owned by a New York hedge fund. His campaign was also charged with sloppy record-keeping.”

“The fund run by Hall, a major Democratic donor who has contributed more than $180,000 to Democratic candidates and causes since 1999 (including $19,000 to Biden’s various committees), has been implicated — but not charged — by Attorney General Andrew Cuomo in a New York state pension fund kickback investigation into a joint venture that paid the Clinton Group $750 million in state funds.

In October 2008, with the probe under way, Cuomo returned a $10,000 donation from Hall.

The FEC audit also found that Biden’s campaign failed to quickly return or otherwise rectify at least $106,000 in contributions beyond the $2,300 maximum donation for individuals during the 2008 election cycle. That was based on an analysis of a sample of contributions, FEC auditors wrote, projecting that the actual total of excessive contributions could exceed $1 million.”

Read more:

https://www.politico.com/story/2010/07/biden-08-campaign-fined-219k-039875

From the AP via Yahoo News January 4, 2013.

“President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign has been fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for reporting violations related to a set of donations received during the final days of the campaign.

The fines are among the largest ever levied on a presidential campaign by the FEC and stem from a series of missing notices for nearly 1,200 contributions totaling nearly $1.9 million.”

Read more:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-08-campaign-fined-375-000-fec-223008379–election.html

Want more of this?

Elect Biden.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Barack Obama, Biden, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, corruption, Democrats, DNC, Election 2008, Election 2020, Election update, FEC, Obama, Obama administration, Obama lies, Obama records

Tagged , , ,

George Floyd hospital admission test revealed “fatal level of fentanyl”, Final toxicology results, Dr. Andrew Baker Chief Medical Examiner, Better than autopsy samples

Posted on August 28, 2020 | 1 comment

George Floyd hospital admission test revealed “fatal level of fentanyl”, Final toxicology results, Dr. Andrew Baker Chief Medical Examiner, Better than autopsy samples

“Officer Derek Chauvin and George Floyd both engaged in crimes and their lives should not be honored.”…Citizen Wells

“The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have.”..Malcom X

“George Floyd had a record of criminal activity including using a gun pushed against a woman’s stomach. On the day of his arrest, Floyd, under the influence of drugs, presented a counterfeit $ 100 dollar bill.”…Fact

 

Notes from conversation with Dr. Andrew Baker, Chief Hennepin County Medical Examiner June 1, 2020.

“On May 31, 2020 at 7:30 p.m., Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Patrick Lofton and met with Dr. Andrew Baker (AB) on Microsoft Teams. All three of us were in different locations. Dr. Baker said he had (and had recently received) the nal toxicology results from Mr. George Floyd’s samples which were analyzed by NMS labs.

AB shared his screen and showed us the results. He said that where it says, “Hospital Blood,” those samples are from Mr. Floyd’s hospital admission and were not acquired at autopsy. AB said that these samples are better for determining actual blood toxicity than samples taken at autopsy. Samples
taken at autopsy may have undergone “post mortem distribution.”

AB walked us down the list of substances for which NMS labs tested. Those values he highlighted were:

4ANPP precursor and metabolite of fentanyl present in Mr. Floyd’s blood.

Methamphetamine 19 ng/ML which he described as “very near the low end” and “a stimulant hard on the heart.”

Fentanyl 11. He said, “that’s pretty high.” This level of fentanyl can cause pulmonary edema. Mr. Floyd’s lungs were 2-3x their normal weight at autopsy. That is fatal level offentanyl under normal circumstances.

Norfentanyl 5.6 metabolite of fentanyl.

Mr. Floyd’s urine was tested for things and are redundant, given the blood analysis. AB said, “the only thing that matters is what’s in his blood.”

http://www.mncourts.gov/getattachment/Media/StateofMinnesotavTouThao/Container-Documents/Content-Documents/Exhibit-4.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

1 Comment

Posted in Accountability, CDC, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, drugs, Lies, police

Tagged , , ,

Clarence Henderson supports Donald Trump and loves America, RNC speech tonight Aug 26, 2020, Greensboro A&T Woolworths sit in activist

Posted on August 26, 2020 | 7 comments

Clarence Henderson supports Donald Trump and loves America, RNC speech tonight Aug 26, 2020, Greensboro A&T Woolworths sit in activist

“Politicians are a dime a dozen, but leaders are priceless,”    “Donald Trump is a leader. And he loves America.”...Clarence Henderson

“The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have.”...Malcom X

“Mr. Trump is saying let’s all stand together as Americans. I have not heard a racist word out of that man’s mouth.”…Ben Stein

 

Clarence Henderson’s full remarks at the GOP Convention

 

From the Greensboro News Record August 25, 2020.

(Print edition)

“Sit-in activist backs Trump”

(Online edition)

‘He loves America’: N.C. A&T student who participated in sit-ins is an unlikely, and unabashed, Trump supporter”

“As he prerecorded a speech for the Republican National Convention last week in front of a mural at the Windsor Recreational Center, Clarence Henderson’s wife told him he needed “to put a little energy in it.”

“I like for the words to resonate,” retorted the low-key, 79-year-old High Point businessman.

Henderson, who as a student at N.C. A&T took part in the historic sit-ins at the old Woolworth department store lunch counter in downtown, is among Wednesday’s speakers at the convention. Dismayed by the violence and vandalism that has erupted in recent months by those demanding racial equality, Henderson will address peaceful protesting and fighting injustices through the legal system.”

“For those who wonder how a Black man, much less one like Henderson who was at the epicenter of the civil rights movement’s resurgence in the 1960s, can support Trump, well, the answer for him is easy.

“Politicians are a dime a dozen, but leaders are priceless,” said Henderson, who attended Dudley High School. “Donald Trump is a leader. And he loves America.””

“In 1960, Henderson became a part of history, which was memorialized in what is now an iconic photo, when four A&T freshmen — Joseph McNeil, Franklin McCain, David Richmond and Ezell Blair Jr. (now Jibreel Khazan) — sat at Woolworth’s segregated lunch counter and asked to be served.

When they were denied, Henderson and others would fill the seats over a period of months, until the counter was integrated.

The sit-in movement spread and is credited with spurring radical changes for people of color throughout the South.

Henderson, who showed up at Woolworth on the second day of the sit-ins, says that his life wasn’t immune to racism before that event — or after.

While in the Army, he recalled flyers that showed up at the Alabama military installation where he was assigned. At the time, former Alabama Gov. George Wallace, an avowed segregationist, was running for president.

“(The flyers) said: ‘Put a white man in the White House and not that ‘n-lover’ Lyndon Baines Johnson,” Henderson said.

He says those who see Trump as racist are wrong.”

“”I know what racism is,” Henderson said. “I know it every time I see it.”

As you can imagine, he’s gotten grief for being a Black Republican. Henderson says that his fight for equal rights for Black people is not voided by the fact that he also believes in less government in the lives of individuals and the economic policies of the Republican Party.

“People are apprehensive about what they’ll say (about Trump),” Henderson said. “I’m not, but others are.”

Henderson thinks Trump will serve another term. On Wednesday, he’ll do his part to get him there.”

Read more:

https://greensboro.com/news/local_news/he-loves-america-n-c-a-t-student-who-participated-in-sit-ins-is-an/article_a88cfe90-e672-11ea-82d4-ff6a0ebc7891.html

Joseph McNeil (from left), Franklin McCain, Billy Smith and Clarence Henderson take part in Day 2 of the sit-ins at Woolworth on Feb. 2, 1960. McNeil and McCain were members of the Greensboro Four, who initiated the protests.

Watch Henderson’s speech tonight:

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

7 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Americans, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, History, Republican Convention, republicans

Tagged , , ,

Jonathan Turley et al schooled on Kamala Harris NBC status by Citizen Wells commenter, Turley commenter and of course Wells, Harris not Natural Born Citizen

Posted on August 19, 2020 | 3 comments

Jonathan Turley et al schooled on Kamala Harris NBC status by Citizen Wells commenter, Turley commenter and of course Wells, Harris not Natural Born Citizen

“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“Every American President before Obama had two parents who were American citizens.”...Jonathan Turley commenter George

“The Natural Born Citizen requirement for the US Presidency should have been ruled on and clarified in 2008 by the SCOTUS. Marbury v Madison makes that clear. To not do so now would be treasonous.”…Citizen Wells

 

A decision was made at Citizen Wells in 2008 to go for quality over quantity in commenters. It has paid off.

The spam filters stay busy.

Longtime quality commenter Pete is a fine example.

He schools Jonathan Turley, et al on the qualifications to be POTUS as a Natural Born Citizen.

From Pete today.

“The issue for people like Turley, is that they are hung up on British Common Law and it’s consequences to the United States Criminal Justice system. Since most Americans are ignorant of their history and heritage, this is what you get.

Specifically, the US Supreme court needs to interpret the term “Natural Born Citizen”. The framers intent, that one could never be “King of England” and President of the United States, put the term into the requirements for POTUS, and the 12th Amendment added the requirement for VPOTUS. The did this to prevent ‘entanglements’. Please see letters from John Jay to George Washington, to understand that the Commander in Chief of the Military couldn’t have dual loyalties.

The poorly educated, or those that simply want a work around to the Constitution use English Common law reference for British Subjects to subvert the Constitution and the Republic. Yet these opinions have no explanation for why the War of 1812 was fought (over press ganging of US sailors who were born as British Subjects), and understanding that We the People ABSOLUTELY did not accept British Common law as it pertains to our citizens. However, the Founding Father’s clearly understood that they were born British Subjects, so that had to put an exemption into the Constitution, so that those born before 1790 didn’t have to be “Natural Born”.

So…..Where did the term Natural Born Citizen come from? Clearly it wasn’t British because 1) We didn’t accept British Common law on our citiizens. 2) British are born as Subjects, NOT CITIZENS, in that time and place. Therefore, we must look elsewhere to find what the founding fathers were reading to understand their intent. Herein lies the history of who were were allied with in 1790, and it wasn’t the British. Yes, we were most definitively allied with the French. Indeed, the answer lies here.

https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/vattel-the-law-of-nations-lf-ed

The answer is France, and a unique piece of critical thinking at the time. Vattel’s work on laws of nations.

However, claiming that it was Vattel that they turned to, without evidence, is making a story whole cloth. On the other hand, if there were proof that those individuals who conspired to create the Republic were aware of Vattel, read Vattel, then it becomes obvious that the Term “Natural Born Citizen” is derived from that work.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-library-washington/george-washingtons-library-book-returned-221-yrs-late-idUSTRE64J4EG20100520

“The missing book came to light when the New York Society Library was restoring its 1789-1792 charging ledger, which features the borrowing history of Washington, John Adams, John Jay, Aaron Burr, Alexander Hamilton, George Clinton, and others.”

Lawyers lie, and History leaves NO DOUBT that they were reading and exchanging about Vattel’s Law of Nations. Natural Born Citizen, under Vattel, is and individual without divided loyalties at birth. That person, born of two citizen parents, on citizen soil, could claim no other country and could not be claimed by another. There was no conflict.

This story can only be understood under the geopolitical events of the time of the writing of the Constitution. We know the geopolitical events, we have the evidence of whose ideas they talked about and read, and we know why. Today’s Democrats and those Ignorant of the Constitution would destroy it and distort our history to bring their ‘new’ government. That political history is not in doubt now that we know the last POTUS used government itself to subvert the Republic as he spied on his political opponents.

In the words of our founding fathers “I hold these truths to be self evident”. The SCOTUS needs to make a decision, to take up the burden and decide upon the fate of the Republic by ‘determining’ what the term Natural Born Citizen meant.”

From astute commenter George at Jonathan Turley’s website commenting on

“Kamala Harris will NEVER be eligible to be U.S. president or vice president.

Kamala Harris’ parents were foreign citizens at the time of her birth.

– A mere “citizen” could only have been President at the time of the adoption of the Constitution – not after.

– The U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, requires the President to be a “natural born citizen,” which, by definition in the Law of Nations, requires “parents who are citizens” at the time of birth of the candidate and that he be “…born of a father who is a citizen;…”

– Ben Franklin thanked Charles Dumas for copies of the Law of Nations which “…has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting,…”

– “The importance of The Law of Nations, therefore, resides both in its systematic derivation of international law from natural law and in its compelling synthesis of the modern discourse of natural jurisprudence with the even newer language of political economy. The features help to explain the continuing appeal of this text well into the nineteenth century among politicians, international lawyers and political theorists of every complexion,” Law of Nations Editors Bela Kapossy and Richard Whatmore.

– The Jay/Washington letter of July, 1787, raised the presidential requirement from citizen to “natural born citizen” to place a “strong check” against foreign allegiances by the commander-in-chief.

– Every American President before Obama had two parents who were American citizens.

– The Constitution is not a dictionary and does not define words or phrases like “natural born citizen” as a dictionary, while the Law of Nations, 1758, did.”

“The “case law” is the pudding – it is in the Jay/Washington letter which imposed a “STRONG CHECK” against candidates for president and command in chief as citizenship status – the strongest check, “natural born citizen,” being far stronger than “citizen,” the only formal and complete definition existing in the Law of Nations, 1758, which “…has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting,….” according to Ben Franklin.

“Natural Born Citizen”- Strong Check

“Citizen” – Weak Check
___________________

To George Washington from John Jay, 25 July 1787

From John Jay

New York 25 July 1787

Dear Sir

I was this morning honored with your Excellency’s Favor of the 22d

Inst: & immediately delivered the Letter it enclosed to Commodore

Jones, who being detained by Business, did not go in the french Packet,

which sailed Yesterday.

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to

provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the

administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief

of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.

Mrs Jay is obliged by your attention, and assures You of her perfect

Esteem & Regard—with similar Sentiments the most cordial and sincere

I remain Dear Sir Your faithful Friend & Servt

John Jay”

Read more:

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/08/14/yes-kamala-harris-is-eligible-for-vice-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1990909

After multiple attempts to get a comment posted and approved, I replied to several existing comments.

One of numerous articles I have posted that explains the ruse:

https://citizenwells.com/2016/11/11/chuck-todd-is-not-stupid-todd-is-along-with-media-and-democrat-party-biased-and-colluding-zero-proof-of-obama-us-birth-chuck-todd-and-nbc-staff-attack-trump-for-insulting-president-birth-certi/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Biden, British, Chief Justice, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Commander in Chief, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Law, Election update, Eligibility, Natural born citizen, Obama, US Constitution

Tagged , ,