Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution
From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.
For Immediate Release – 19 November 2010
Unconstitutionally, Ineligible Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html
Ineligible and Unconstitutionally Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution by: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.
History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.
http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html
Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields
Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama
Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama
From Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., November 18, 2010.
“SENTINEL INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LLC
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
____________
CONSULTANT AT:
Protective Intelligence and Assessment
Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Private-Sector Intelligence Analyst Lyle@SentinelIntelligenceServices.com
____________________ ____________________
Wednesday –
Email Briefing: NON-CLASSIFIED
November the 18th, 2010″
“While much of America was caught up with the political intrigue of the recent elections a most grave and alarming event occurred, 30-miles off the coast of Los Angeles. The incident I reference was the mysterious and completely unexpected firing of a large Cruise or ICBM missile, launched by a sub-surface aquatic platform. This incident is further momentous and fraught with peril due to the defense systems and protocols in place that should have caught the sub sitting out there in the first place, not to mention when an object went airborne. Adding an ominous dimension to this already very disturbing event, I fear our national security is truly threatened by a weak man posing as Commander-in-Chief, and who has demonstrated limited problem-solving ability. What scares me more is the absence of leadership at the highest levels in the Pentagon.
What America saw on commercial TV was a missile launch, and this same image was captured by NORAD, immediately assessed by a variety of military experts and simultaneously passed forward to a four-star General, who then made almost instant contact with the President. This IS the system; the protocol in place and practiced frequently – for just a moment like this. There is no excuse for failure; it is NOT an option. NORAD and the assessment/response system are one of the most critical missions and tenets of National Defense and its sole purpose of protecting the American people. Any mistake, any deviation from protocol, any cut corners or casual response, any failure in the system and the most intense review from the highest level is initiated, as well as discipline and even removal from status or position can occur.
Twenty-four hours a day, every day, a team of approximately 150-highly qualified and selected professionals, led by a Brigadier General in conjunction with one of the most sophisticated computer and reporting systems in the world is fed data from different sensors able to detect “missile shots” from any point on the globe. An unknown missile launch directly off the coast of America would have automatically triggered a well scripted National Security response by NORAD informing the Commander-in-Chief. The decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star General level and goes directly to a decision made by the Commander-in-Chief. This is also part of the system in place which can not be altered.
Mr. Obama continues to deceive WE THE PEOPLE, choosing to keep the American people in the dark on an issue that constitutes a real Clear and Present Danger. It is quite understandable why Americans view most of what comes out of our government’s official statements as well intended deceptions, purposeful misinformation, or conversely, muted with no explanation. It is equally understandable why so many believe there are actually conspiracies at work within our government to keep Americans confused and mind controlled. Other country’s leaders have assessed Mr. Obama as morally weak, conflicted, and with the results of these recent elections, politically lost. What staggers the imagination is what motivates the military by going along with such deviousness? Where are our military leaders who have sworn to defend the constitution? I know they are better than this, and in their own private clubs, they must be ashamed and perplexed. I pray they are because that would signal they still have a conscience at work within them, something Mr. Obama does not appear to possess.
Intel chatter suggests China sent a shot across the bow of America to signal their growing displeasure, and even anger, at Mr. Obama and associates for messing with the world’s economy.”
Read more:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=12c5f7c643657dec&mt=application/msword&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D2485918dad%26view%3Datt%26th%3D12c5f7c643657dec%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dattd%26zw&sig=AHIEtbS-3lD97dADAJPTn6oCvB065TvAFw&pli=1
About Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.:
http://www.sentinelintelligenceservices.com/About-Us.html
32 Comments
Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Commander in Chief, Government, Military officers, News, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, The Case Against Barack Obama, United States, US Military, Washington DC, white house
Tagged Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Missile controversy, National security threatened by Obama, Ph.D. commentary