Category Archives: Government

Government

Oath of office, Military, Congress, Cub scouts, US Constitution, Duty, Citizen Wells open thread, November 22, 2010

Oath of office, Military, Congress, Cub scouts, US Constitution, Duty

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Oath: a solemn appeal to a deity, or to some revered person or thing, to witness one’s determination to speak the truth, to keep a promise, etc.: to testify upon oath.

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
So help me God.”…US Military officer’s oath of office

Officers in the service of the United States are bound by this oath to disobey any order that violates the Constitution of the United States.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

One of my friends who I see with some regularity always sees me working on my computer and often on this blog. He asked me recently why I do not take a day off from writing on this blog. I responded with one word, duty. It is my duty.

The first oath that I took.

Cub Scout Promise

“I, (say your name), promise
to DO MY BEST
To do my DUTY to GOD
And my Country
To HELP other people, and
To OBEY the LAW of the Pack.”

Cub Scout Motto

“DO YOUR BEST”

LTC Terry Lakin takes his oath seriously. He is facing court martial.

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret), takes his oath seriously. He is the plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama. He and his attorney, Mario Apuzzo have a  Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference tomorrow, November 23, 2010, before the US Supreme Court.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/washington-times-scotus-kerchner-v.html

Members of Congress, we demand that you follow your oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;”

Ron Wyden to block COICA, Oregon senator opposes Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, Citizen Wells open thread, November 21, 2010

Ron Wyden to block COICA, Oregon senator opposes Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act

From PC World November 19, 2010.

“A U.S. senator has vowed to fight attempts to pass a controversial copyright protection bill that would allow the U.S. government to shut down websites suspected of hosting infringing materials.

Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, said late Thursday that he would seek to block the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, or COICA, from passing through the full Senate, unless the legislation is changed. Earlier Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 19-0 to approve the bill and send it to the full Senate.

Wyden called the bill the “wrong medicine” for dealing with online copyright infringement. The bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice to seek expedited court orders requiring U.S. domain-name registrars to shut down domestic websites suspected of hosting infringing materials. The bill would also allow the DOJ, through court orders, to order U.S. ISPs to redirect customer traffic away from infringing foreign websites.

“Deploying this statute to combat online copyright infringement seems almost like using a bunker-busting cluster bomb, when what you need is a precision-guided missile,” Wyden said during a hearing on digital trade issues. “If you don’t think this thing through carefully, the collateral damage would be American innovation, American jobs, and a secure Internet.”

Wyden’s opposition means the bill is likely dead this year. Individual senators can place holds on legislation, and there are only a few working days left in the congressional session this year. Sponsors of the legislation, including fellow Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, would have to reintroduce the bill if it doesn’t pass this year.”

“COICA is an example of repeated efforts to fix long-time problems through Internet restrictions, said Ed Black, president and CEO of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a tech trade group. The Judiciary Committee pushed through the bill without adequate hearings and input from the public, Black said.

“The significance and implications of the legislation I don’t think have been well thought through,” Black said during the hearing on digital trade. “Sadly, it’s an example of what not to do in an important, complicated digital ecosystem.””

Read  more:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/211162/senator_threatens_to_block_online_copyright_bill.html

I agree with senator Ron Wyden and Ed Black. This bill gives the government too much power and was not well thought out.

For starters, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont is the sponsor. That should be red flag enough. This is the same Senator Leahy of Vermont who did not reply to my voice message or email when I was in Burlington, VT when I got the video of the Senator Bernie Sanders speech and a brief interview.

And what about these Republican Senator cosponsors?

Lamar Alexander [R-TN]
Thomas Coburn [R-OK]
Lindsey Graham [R-SC]
Charles Grassley [R-IA]
Orrin Hatch [R-UT]
James Inhofe [R-OK]
George Voinovich [R-OH]

More RINO’s? Or are they just not paying attention or listening to the public?

I am not certain if the full text of the bill is available yet. My first 2 attempts to get it failed.

From GovTrack, a summary.

“Congressional Research Service Summary

The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.

9/20/2010–Introduced.
Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act – Amends the federal criminal code to authorize the Attorney General (AG) to commence an action for injunctive relief against a domain name used by an Internet site that is “dedicated to infringing activities,” even where such a domain name is not located in the United States. Defines an Internet site that “dedicated to infringing activities” as a site that is: (1) subject to civil forfeiture; (2) designed primarily to offer goods or services in violation of federal copyright law; or (3) selling counterfeit goods. Requires the AG to maintain a public listing of domain names that the Department of Justice (DOJ) determines are dedicated to infringing activities but for which the AG has not filed an action. Allows parties to petition the AG to remove such a domain name from the list and obtain judicial review of the final determination in a civil action.”

Read more:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3804

Another source of information:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s3804/show

Obama eligibility in Supreme Court November 23, 2010, Congressmen are you listening?, Military or court records or biased media reporting?

Obama eligibility in Supreme Court November 23, 2010, Congressmen are you listening?, Military or court records or biased media reporting?

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

Reported here November 8, 2010.

Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari Distributed for Conference by the Justices on 23 Nov 2010
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm

Contact Attorney Mario Apuzzo for more details and comment at:
Mario Apuzzo, Esq., Jamesburg, New Jersey
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Tel: 732-521-1900, Fax: 732-521-3906
Email: apuzzo@erols.com
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####”

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.
Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

Read more:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/kerchner-v-obama-update-november-8-2010-writ-of-certiorari-distributed-to-us-supreme-court-justices/

Reported November 17, 2010.

“From the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal November 17, 2010.”

“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

“My response to the following paragraph from above:

“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

The following is a factual statement:

“most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961″

Most “news organizations” did repeat that lie.

“there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”

Apparently, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal is part of the conspiracy to perpetuate the lies.

Facts:

July 2009 AOL Poll: 81% say Obama should release birth certificate.

August 2009 Public Policy Polling of Virginia:

Born elsewhere 24%

Not sure 24%

July 2010 CNN Poll: Less than half were convinced of Obama US birth.

Probably born in US 29 %

Probably born elsewhere 16 %

Definitely born elsewhere 11 %

So,  Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, what is your excuse for inaccurate reporting?”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/texas-bill-birth-certificate-required-for-presidential-candidate-texas-secretary-of-state-obama-birth-certificate-lubbock-avalanche-journal/

I posted a comment under this article:

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”

The following classic left wing response to my comment:

“The Answer: He hasn’t.

Get a life, birthertard”

Here is one of numerous court records that prove that the commenter and the mainstream media are liars.

From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner v Obama & Congress to be conferenced on by Supreme Court on Tuesday, 23 Nov 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress

Members of Congress, are you paying attention?

Who or what do you put your trust in?

Rumors, biased media reports?

Or do you listen to high ranking military officers, knowledgeable, patriotic attorneys, concerned Americans?

Do you believe court documents?

How about US Supreme Court documents?

Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

Charles Kerchner, Obama can and should be removed from office, Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend Constitution

From Charles Kerchner, plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

For Immediate Release – 19 November 2010

Unconstitutionally, Ineligible Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html
Ineligible and Unconstitutionally Elected & Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed. A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution  by: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.
http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields

Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Congress 101, How to act like a congressman, US Constitution, Support military, Listen to public, Act like you have some damn sense

Congress 101, How to act like a congressman, US Constitution, Support military, Listen to public, Act like you have some damn sense

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

New members of Congress recently received indoctrination on how Congress works. If past results are any indication, forget everything you heard unless it pertained to…

  • Uphold and defend the US Constitution. It is the supreme law of the land.
  • Support the military.
  • Listen to the public and act like you have some damn sense.

Most in the military take their oath to defend the US Constitution seriously. One military officer, LTC Terry Lakin, is living that oath.

From American Patriot Foundation.

“American Patriot Foundation: Updates on LTC Terry Lakin’s Case
http://www.SafeguardOurConstitution.com
 
 
THANK YOU to everyone for the tremendous response and participation in “Terry Lakin Action Week”- your phone calls and messages are making a difference. We apologize to anyone who hasn’t received a response yet back to an email- we do our best to keep up, but it is hard sometimes to keep abreast of all requests and comments received.
 
PLEASE KEEP UP THE PRESSURE- PHONE CALLS TO ELECTED OFFICIALS MATTER- AND A SPECIAL THANKS TO THOSE OF YOU WHO WALKED INTO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OFFICES TO RAISE YOUR VOICE IN SUPPORT OF LTC LAKIN.
 
Just this week, there were significant new developments on the eligibility front:
A state legislator in Texas introduced a bill requiring presidential candidates to file birth certificates- with the notable comment below:
 
“This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place,’ Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, said in reference to President Barack Obama and of House Bill 295. ‘If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.
http://lubbockonline.com/local-news/2010-11-17/birth-certificate-bill-filed-presidential-candidates
 
AND— former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, in an interview in Anchorage pointed out the failure to vet Barack Obama in 2008:
 
Sarah Palin chatted with KWHL’s Bob and Mark Show to discuss the re-release of John Ziegler’s documentary How Obama Got Elected and her travelogue series, telling Bob and Mark that the hagiographic coverage of Obama in 2007-8 is now “coming home to roost”:
 
We know that Obama wasn’t vetted through the campaign, and now, you know, some things are coming home to roost, if you will, which is inexperience, his associations, and that ultimately harms our republic when a candidate isn’t – isn’t vetted by the media, that cornerstone of our democracy. So, you’re right, it’s not about me and whether you like my politics or not. You can push all that aside, and just pay attention to what that message is in this documentary, and that is that things have got to change for the better in the state of journalism. Otherwise, you know, it could be part of a demise of our democracy if that cornerstone erodes.
 
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/video-sarah-palin-we-know-that-obama.html
 
Be sure to download and read our Congressional Blunders report avaiable from the home page of our site.
 
// Margaret Hemminway
// www.safeguardourconstitution.com

WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW
Support Terry’s Communications Efforts
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/support-the-foundation.html

Add a Banner to Your Website
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/banners-and-graphics.html
Forward this email to anyone you feel may have an interest in Terry’s case.”

High ranking military officers are speaking out, questioning Obama’s eligibility and at least one general has called for Obama’s resignation. If you were in Congress in  2008 and 2009 and bought in to the Orwellian lies from the media and Obama camp and the hustle from Obama, pay attention and admit that you made a mistake. If you are not willing to trust members of the military like LTC Terry Lakin, then pay attention to this.

Obama the hustler.

“Bartle Bull, lifelong liberal Democrat, Civil Rights Attorney, called Obama a “hustler.””

(From Atlas Shrugs)

“The Biggest Hustle in Human History”

“Is the President’s resume accurate when it comes to his career and qualifications? I can corroborate that Obama’s “teaching career” at Chicago was, to put it kindly, a sham.

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on his bar application. …”

“Curiously, since I relayed a report of Obama’s “teaching career” at Chicago (he was apparently never a law professor, as some have claimed), the Illinois Bar has decided to partially redact what little public information it had available on its website related to the President’s legal status.”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2010/11/19/obama-hustler-democrat-bartle-bull-called-obama-hustler-obama-resume-hustle-no-professor-no-law-license/

Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama

Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama

From Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., November 18, 2010.

“SENTINEL INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LLC
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
____________
 
CONSULTANT AT:
Protective Intelligence and Assessment
Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Private-Sector Intelligence Analyst                                                                                        Lyle@SentinelIntelligenceServices.com
____________________                                                                                                        ____________________
Wednesday –                                                                                                            

Email Briefing: NON-CLASSIFIED
November the 18th, 2010″

“While much of America was caught up with the political intrigue of the recent elections a most grave and alarming event occurred, 30-miles off the coast of Los Angeles.  The incident I reference was the mysterious and completely unexpected firing of a large Cruise or ICBM missile, launched by a sub-surface aquatic platform.  This incident is further momentous and fraught with peril due to the defense systems and protocols in place that should have caught the sub sitting out there in the first place, not to mention when an object went airborne.  Adding an ominous dimension to this already very disturbing event, I fear our national security is truly threatened by a weak man posing as Commander-in-Chief, and who has demonstrated limited problem-solving ability.  What scares me more is the absence of leadership at the highest levels in the Pentagon. 
 
What America saw on commercial TV was a missile launch, and this same image was captured by NORAD, immediately assessed by a variety of military experts and simultaneously passed forward to a four-star General, who then made almost instant contact with the President.  This IS the system; the protocol in place and practiced frequently – for just a moment like this.  There is no excuse for failure; it is NOT an option.  NORAD and the assessment/response system are one of the most critical missions and tenets of National Defense and its sole purpose of protecting the American people.  Any mistake, any deviation from protocol, any cut corners or casual response, any failure in the system and the most intense review from the highest level is initiated, as well as discipline and even removal from status or position can occur.
 
Twenty-four hours a day, every day, a team of approximately 150-highly qualified and selected professionals, led by a Brigadier General in conjunction with one of the most sophisticated computer and reporting systems in the world is fed data from different sensors able to detect “missile shots” from any point on the globe.  An unknown missile launch directly off the coast of America would have automatically triggered a well scripted National Security response by NORAD informing the Commander-in-Chief.  The decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star General level and goes directly to a decision made by the Commander-in-Chief.  This is also part of the system in place which can not be altered.

Mr. Obama continues to deceive WE THE PEOPLE, choosing to keep the American people in the dark on an issue that constitutes a real Clear and Present Danger.  It is quite understandable why Americans view most of what comes out of our government’s official statements as well intended deceptions, purposeful misinformation, or conversely, muted with no explanation.  It is equally understandable why so many believe there are actually conspiracies at work within our government to keep Americans confused and mind controlled.  Other country’s leaders have assessed Mr. Obama as morally weak, conflicted, and with the results of these recent elections, politically lost.  What staggers the imagination is what motivates the military by going along with such deviousness?  Where are our military leaders who have sworn to defend the constitution?  I know they are better than this, and in their own private clubs, they must be ashamed and perplexed.  I pray they are because that would signal they still have a conscience at work within them, something Mr. Obama does not appear to possess.
 
Intel chatter suggests China sent a shot across the bow of America to signal their growing displeasure, and even anger, at Mr. Obama and associates for messing with the world’s economy.”

Read more:

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=12c5f7c643657dec&mt=application/msword&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D2485918dad%26view%3Datt%26th%3D12c5f7c643657dec%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dattd%26zw&sig=AHIEtbS-3lD97dADAJPTn6oCvB065TvAFw&pli=1

About Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.:

http://www.sentinelintelligenceservices.com/About-Us.html

US Constitution Hall of Shame, New Congressmen, Will they listen?, Will they obey the Constitution?, Citizen Wells open thread, November 14, 2010

 US Constitution Hall of Shame, New Congressmen, Will they listen?, Will they obey the Constitution?

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

From the US Constitution Hall of Shame, created in 2008.

““I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

 

 
The following Senators and Representatives were added to
the US Constitution Hall of Shame because of their
inaccurate or ambiguous responses to concerns voiced to
them about Barack Obama’s eligibility. The congressmen
provided reponses that ranged from confused to utter
stupidity and party bias. It is recognized that many of
them have been fooled just as many in the public have
been. Some of these congressmen have a consistent
pattern of putting party politics over country. However,
it is hoped that many, when confronted with the facts
relating to Obama’s eligibility and the 2008 election,
will ask questions and endeavor to seek the truth.

Congress will convene on January 8, 2009 to count and
validate the Electoral College votes. This presents an
opportunity to challenge the Electoral College votes and
Obama’s eligibility. It is apparent, that after learning
the truth about Obama’s lack of qualifications, many in
congress will be compelled to demand that Obama provide
proof of eligibility.

Contact these congressmen and make sure they know the truth.
We suggest that you call their office(s).”

Not one member of Congress stood up to challenge Obama’s eligibility before or during the Electoral College certification in January 2009, despite being forewarned and despite their oaths to uphold the US Constitution.

There has been “much water over the dam” since that moment. More of the real Barack Obama has been exposed. More candidates running for office during the last election have been listening to the public, more have aligned themselves with the Constitution and anti big government initiatives like the Tea Party Movement.

I am requesting your input. Of all the new members of Congress, who do you believe is most ready to “walk the walk” and not just “talk the talk” regarding Constitutional issues, including, but not limited to,  Obama’s eligibility.

California mystery missile UFO captured in raw footage?, Catalina Island UFO sightings, UFO hunters

California mystery missile UFO captured in raw footage?, Catalina Island UFO sightings, UFO hunters

I have been listening to all of the government denials, theories and ridiculous
comments about the California Mystery Missile being an airplane. It is obvious,
after a brief perusal that this is not an airplane. I finally found a few minutes
and examined the raw footage. What I found amazed me. I do not have any special video analyzing tools or experience, however I can see well and think. I put up a simple video of the just over 5 second segment.
Reported here on November 10, 2010.

“Is our government lying to us again?

I am not saying or implying that a UFO was involved. However, after listening to all the denials, I was reminded of an incident from 1966 off the coast of Catalina Island.”

UFO Hunters has covered this story and other strange occurences happening around Catalina Island.

http://www.history.com/shows/ufo-hunters/videos/catalina-island#catalina-island

http://www.history.com/shows/ufo-hunters/videos/usos#usos

Read more:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/catalina-island-missile-ufo-connection-us-government-lying-to-us-again-1966-ufo-video/

I placed the following comment under that article.

“Interesting hypothesis:
Suppose our sub fired a missle at a UFO.
Thought provoking, eh?”

Here is what I found when I examine the video clip.

The raw video can be viewed here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAZLYn44FeQ

A clearer view of the object:

This is starting to look a lot like Roswell.

Mystery Missile Launch explained by US Notice to Mariners Report?, Citizen Wells open thread, November 11, 2010

Mystery Missile Launch explained by US Notice to Mariners Report?

What is Big Brother up to?

From Citizens for Legitimate Government.
“U.S. ‘Notice to Mariners’ Report May Explain Mystery Missile Launch

U.S. ‘Notice to Mariners’ Report May Explain Mystery Missile Launch Posted by Lori Price, www.legitgov.org 11 Nov 2010 A ‘Notice to Mariners’ report entry may explain the missile launch earlier this week from Southern California waters near Catalina Island. Page 55 of the current ‘Notice to Mariners’ report, dated 6 November 2010, notes upcoming firing operations in that area. The report is published weekly by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and prepared jointly with the National Ocean Service and U.S. Coast Guard.”

“NOTICE TO MARNERS
No. 45
06 NOVEMBER 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Published Weekly by the
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Prepared Jointly with the
National Ocean Service and U.S. Coast Guard

Department of Defense

“CALIFORNIA.

MISSILES.

1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z

DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER

SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE

1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY

IN AREA BOUND BY

34-02N 119-04W, 33-52N 119-06W, 33-29N 118-37W,

33-20N 118-37W, 32-11N 120-16W, 31-54N 121-35W,

35-09N 123-39W, 35-29N 123-00W, 35-57N 121-32W,

34-04N 119-04W.

2. VESSELS MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALTER COURSE WITHIN THE ABOVE

AREA DUE TO FIRING OPERATIONS AND ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT

PLEAD CONTROL ON 5081.5 MHZ (5080 KHZ) OR 3238.5 KHZ (3237 KHZ)

SECONDARY OR 156.8 MHZ (CH 16) OR 127.55 MHZ BEFORE ENTERING

THE ABOVE BOUNDARIES AND MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS GUARD WHILE

WITHIN THE RANGE.”

Read more:

http://www.legitgov.org/US-Notice-Mariners-Report-May-Explain-Mystery-Missile-Launch