Category Archives: Attorney General

Barr USDOJ media Senator Peters et al guilty of deceiving American public on Hunter Biden, Investigation began way before election, 17% would have changed vote 

Posted on December 19, 2020 | 12 comments

Barr USDOJ media Senator Peters et al guilty of deceiving American public on Hunter Biden, Investigation began way before election, 17% would have changed vote

“And if I were a Democrat primary voter, I’d want these questions satisfactorily answered before I cast my final vote.”…Senator Johnson Mar 4, 2020 on Hunter Biden investigation

“I’m making this statement to set the record straight about the involvement of the Biden family, Vice President Biden, his brother Jim Biden, and his son Hunter Biden in dealings with the Chinese.”,,,Tony Bobulinski

“The same voter fraud in Michigan that gave Biden the lead likely did so for Senator Gary Peters. The reason he protest so much.”…Citizen Wells

 

Attorney General Barr let the American people down.

Falsely hiding behind erroneous lofty ideals will not change that.

From The Epoch Times December 19, 2020.

“Barr Defends Not Making Hunter Biden Probe Public Before Election

Attorney General William Barr said in an interview published Friday that he has no regrets over not letting the public know before the election that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son was under investigation.

Barr told The Wall Street Journal that a Department of Justice (DOJ) rule against publicly confirming probes that involve candidates for office is “not absolute” and that he could think of scenarios in which the government has “decisive evidence of a serious crime against a candidate.”

Absent such decisive evidence, though, Barr said, there’s “damn good reason for the rule,” which protects candidates and people in their orbits from the government.

“Think about the power it would give the federal bureaucracy,” Barr said. “The standard for investigating someone is low. So just gin up an investigation, make it public, affect every election.”

Barr, in expressing no regrets, tacitly expressed for the first time that he knew Hunter Biden was under investigation by federal authorities before Nov. 3 but didn’t let the public know.”

Read more:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/barr-defends-not-making-hunter-biden-probe-public-before-election_3625250.html

There are 4 huge problems with Barr’s position:

  1. The Hunter Biden investigation has been ongoing since at least 2018.
  2. The FBI has had possession of Hunter’s laptop for well over a year.
  3. Barr’s job was to protect the American people.
  4. 17% of Democrat voters polled indicated they would have changed their vote.

The Fake News Media as expected, did their best to hide and obfuscate the Hunter Biden crime spree.

Senator Gary Peters of Michigan, in conjunction with the FBI, tried to downplay the story and slowed the investigation.

From Citizen Wells.

“Condensed timeline with relevance:

  1. The Albuquerque FBI rejected Hunter Biden’s laptop in July 2019. The son of former VP Biden, with political aspirations who was already associated with shady activities. The offer was made by a retired colonel. Incompetence or more anti Trump bias from the FBI?
  2. ” mid-October of 2019, an FBI Agent reached out to Colonel Mac Isaac” John Paul’s contact information provided.
  3. December 9, 2019 FBI subpoena gave them possession of the computer and hard drive.
  4. February – July 2020 John Paul reached out to several members of Congress and was ignored.
  5. Early September 2020 John Paul reached out to Rudy Giuliani and his attorney Robert Costello.
  6. ” September 24, 2020, John Paul then submitted information about the drive to Senator Ron Johnson through the whistleblower link”
  7. On September 24, 2020 Senators Johnson and Grassley released the following report: “ Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and RelatedConcerns”

It is abundantly clear from the timeline above that the FBI had every opportunity to provide information that likely would have stopped the President Trump Impeachment in its tracks.

Furthermore,

The FBI apparently lied to Senate Committees in March 2020.

Senator Ron Johnson of the Homeland Security Committee sent a letter to FBI Director Wray on October 17, 2020.

He requested information about the Hunter Biden laptop.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/10/18/hunter-biden-computer-update-october-17-2020-ron-johnson-letter-to-wray-whistleblower-contacted-does-the-fbi-possess-material-from-hunter-bidens-laptops/

From the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Finance:

After taking possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in December 2019, the FBI tells them in a March 2020 meeting:

“made clear to our staff that they did not have any additional information to provide”

So who at the FBI kept this important information from the Senate Committees?”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/02/hunter-biden-laptop-timeline-incriminates-fbi-casts-doubt-on-attorney-general-barr-integrity-fbi-withheld-data-from-impeachment-and-lied-to-senator-johnson-committee/

From Senator Gary Peters of Michigan.

“Unfortunately, Chairman Johnson and Chairman Grassley have pursued widely debunked allegations against Vice President Biden and the Obama Administration as their highest investigative priority. Over the past year, the Chairmen have sent 17 letters, conducted more than 50 hours of transcribed interviews, held three in person business meetings to authorize 46 subpoenas, and issued 17 press releases to publicize their allegations. “
“Although the Chairmen’s partisan investigation has broken Committee practices and longstanding traditions of bipartisan oversight, Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden hope the facts laid out in this report will correct the record and return the Committees to their core missions of safeguarding our national security and vital institutions, and working on behalf of the American people.”

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/200923_FullReport_PetersHSGACWydenFinance.pdf

The same voter fraud that gave Biden a lead likely did so for Senator Peters.

Probably why he was outspoken and forceful during the hearing.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

12 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, US Department of Justice, US Senate

Tagged , ,

Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer, et al US Supreme Court re Michigan election fraud, “ballot-stuffing.” ” amplified…. by computer software “

Posted on December 17, 2020 | 3 comments

Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer, et al US Supreme Court re Michigan election fraud, “ballot-stuffing.” ” amplified…. by computer software ”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Filed December 11, 2020

“The scheme and artifice to defraud illegally and fraudulently
manipulate the vote count to manufacture the “election” of Joe Biden as
President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,
but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was
the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballot-stuffing.” It has now
been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run the vote tabulation by domestic and foreign actors for
that very purpose. The petition detailed an especially egregious range of
conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct
occurred throughout the State with the cooperation and control of
Michigan state election officials, including Respondents.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/163621/20201211163936285_Petition%20Michigan%20.pdf

From the

PETITIONERS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Filed December 15, 2020.

“11. In Michigan, a preliminary report, conducted by Russell James
Ramsland, Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC (“ASOG”), summarizing
the results of ASOG’s court-ordered forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems
equipment used in Antrim County, Michigan, was released on December 14, 2020. A copy of this report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The report delivers the following preliminary conclusion:

We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and
purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and
influence election results. The system intentionally generates an
enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then
transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk
adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit
trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we
conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in
Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County
should not have been certified.

Exh. A, ¶ B(2), p. 1. This Interim Report finds that the Dominion software was
updated between the November 3, 2020 election and the subsequent recounts and that the updated software inexplicably produced wildly different results from the election day version. Id. at ¶ B(3), p. 2.

12. The Interim Report finds that the ballot adjudication process is a major
avenue for election fraud on the Dominion system. Further, it finds that the
adjudication log entries are missing from the system – evidence of tampering,
destruction of evidence and a violation of state law. “[T]heir conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software.” Id. at ¶ B(15), p. 3.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/163875/20201215164905775_Final%20Michigan%20Notice%20of%20Supplemental%20Authority.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Court of Appeals, Courts, Crime, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Eligibility, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Chris Krebs fired from CISA and foxes guarding hen house, Krebs defends election integrity and Dominion Voting Systems in Senate hearing Dec 16

Posted on December 16, 2020 | 8 comments

Chris Krebs fired from CISA and foxes guarding hen house, Krebs defends election integrity and Dominion Voting Systems in Senate hearing Dec 16

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Chris Krebs, who was fired from CISA by President Trump, testified in the Senate hearing on election ‘irregularities’  today, December 16, 2020. One of the foxes guarding the hen house. He defends the election integrity and Dominion Voting Systems and is critical of those challenging the results.

Starting around 15:40.

From DJHJ Media.

“Conflict of Interest: Chris Krebs Fired Over Statement that Hid Alleged Relationship Between Feds and Dominion Voting System

President Donald J. Trump fired Chris Krebs, the director of cybersecurity after a very strange announcement went viral about the security of the 2020 Presidential Election claiming it was very safe and secure.

Krebs was head of CISA – the Agency that issued Nov. 12 statement declaring election the “most secure in American history.” CISA failed to disclose that Dominion Voting System, which is the center of the Trump campaign’s focus for voter fraud and foreign interference, was a member of one of the two issuing CISA committees.”

https://djhjmedia.com/kari/conflict-of-interest-chris-krebs-fired-over-statement-that-hid-alleged-relationship-between-feds-and-dominion-voting-system/

The following comes directly from the CISA website:

 

JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL & THE ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR COORDINATING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES

Original release date: November 12, 2020

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) – released the following statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

 

GOVERNMENT FACILITIES SECTOR – ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SUBSECTOR: CHARTERS AND MEMBERSHIP

 

Sector Coordinating Council

  • Amazon Web Services (AWS)
  • Arrikan, Inc./Chaves Consulting, Inc.
  • Associated Press (AP) Elections
  • BPro, Inc.
  • Clear Ballot Group
  • Crosscheck
  • DemTech Voting Solutions
  • Democracy Live
  • Democracy Works
  • DMF Associates
  • Dominion Voting Systems
  • Election Systems & Software (ES&S)
  • Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC)
  • Freeman, Craft, McGregor Group
  • Hart InterCivic
  • KNOWInk
  • Microsoft
  • Microvote General Corp.
  • NTS Data Services
  • PCC Technology Inc.
  • Pro V&V
  • Runbeck Election Services
  • SCYTL
  • SLI Compliance
  • Smartmatic
  • Tenex Software Solutions
  • The Canton Group
  • Unisyn Voting Solutions
  • Voatz
  • VOTEC
  • Votem
  • Voting Works
  • VR Systems

https://www.cisa.gov/government-facilities-election-infrastructure-charters-and-membership

Aside from Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, we also find DemTech Voting Solutions, Election Systems & Software (ES&S) , Unisyn Voting Solutions and God knows who else making money off of elections.

A classic scenario of foxes guarding the hen house.

And to add insult to injury:

From the Arizona website of biased corrupt Secretary of State Katie Hobbs:

“Combating Misinformation”

” FACT: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has an incredibly helpful resource online at cisa.gov/rumorcontrol. This page debunks mis- and dis-information about elections across the country.”

https://www.arizona.vote/misinformation.html

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it”…Joseph Goebbels

Senator Gary Peters, an even bigger fox also spoke at the Senate hearing.

Stay tuned.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

8 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Fox news, fraud, US Senate, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged ,

Trump lawsuit dismissed 4 to 3 by corrupt Wisconsin Supreme Court justices, Dissenters Roggensack Ziegler & Bradley provide honest jurisprudence 

Posted on December 15, 2020 | 9 comments

Trump lawsuit dismissed 4 to 3 by corrupt Wisconsin Supreme Court justices, Dissenters Roggensack Ziegler & Bradley provide honest jurisprudence

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

“We are called upon to declare what the law is. See Marbury v. Madison,
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) (“It is emphatically the province
and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”).
Once again, in an all too familiar pattern, four members of this
court abdicate their responsibility to do so. They refuse to even
consider the uniquely Wisconsin, serious legal issues presented.”...Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Annette Ziegler

 

Trump, et al v Biden, et al was dismissed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court on December 14, 2020.

Justices Brian Hagedorn, Ann Bradley, Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky concurred in the majority opinion of 4 to 3.

They must know the law but for whatever reason chose to ignore it.

The following dissenting opinions highlight that.

Patience Drake Roggensack (dissenting)

Ҧ61 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J. (dissenting).
Elections have consequences. One candidate wins and the other
loses, but in every case, it is critical that the public perceive
that the election was fairly conducted.

¶62 In the case now before us, a significant portion of the
public does not believe that the November 3, 2020, presidential
election was fairly conducted. Once again, four justices on this
court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require
to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast. I respectfully
dissent from that decision. I write separately to address the
merits of the claims presented.1

¶63 The Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane
County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous
advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective
witness addresses were permissible. And, the Dane County Board of
Canvassers erred again when it approved the 200 locations for
ballot collection that comprised Democracy in the Park. The
majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers
did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court
throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be
repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to
correct them. The electorate expects more of us, and we are capable of providing it.2 Because we do not, I respectfully dissent. ”

“III. CONCLUSION
¶105 The Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane
County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous
advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective
witness addresses were permissible. And, the Dane County Board of Canvassers erred again when it approved the 200 locations for
ballot collection that comprised Democracy in the Park. The
majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers
did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court
throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be
repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to
correct them. The electorate expects more of us, and we are
capable of providing it. Because we do not, I respectfully
dissent.”

Annette Kingsland Ziegler (dissenting)

“We are
called upon to declare what the law is. See Marbury v. Madison,
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) (“It is emphatically the province
and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”).
Once again, in an all too familiar pattern, four members of this
court abdicate their responsibility to do so. They refuse to even
consider the uniquely Wisconsin, serious legal issues presented.
The issues presented in this case, unlike those in other cases
around the United States, are based on Wisconsin statutory election
law. Make no mistake, the majority opinion fails to even mention,
let alone analyze, the pertinent Wisconsin statutes. Passing
reference to other states’ decisionmaking is of little relevance
given the Wisconsin legal issues at stake. See Roggensack, C.J.,
dissent, supra; Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J., dissent, infra. The
people of Wisconsin deserve an answer——if not for this election,
then at least to protect the integrity of elections in the future.
Instead of providing clarity, the majority opinion is, once again,
dismissive of the pressing legal issues presented.”

Ҧ136 Despite the fact that the majority relies on laches to
not declare the law in nearly all respects of the challenges
raised, it nonetheless segregates out the indefinitely confined
voter claim to analyze. Notably absent is any explanation why
this claim is not treated like the other challenges.

¶137 Therefore, the majority’s application of laches here is
unfortunate and doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine
confidence and spawn needless litigation. Instead of declaring what the law is, the majority is legislating its preferred policy.
It disenfranchises those that followed the law in favor of those
who acted in contravention to it. This is not the rule of law; it
is the rule of judicial activism through inaction.

III. CONCLUSION
¶138 As I would not apply laches in the case at issue and
instead would analyze the statutes and available remedies as well
as the actions of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, I
respectfully dissent.”

Rebecca Grassl Bradley (dissenting)

“Once again,
the majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court wields the
discretionary doctrine of laches as a mechanism to avoid answering
questions of law the people of Wisconsin elected us to decide.
Although nothing in the law compels its application, this majority
routinely hides behind laches in election law cases no matter when
a party asserts its claims. Whether election officials complied
with Wisconsin law in administering the November 3, 2020 election
is of fundamental importance to the voters, who should be able to
rely on the advice they are given when casting their ballots.
Rather than fulfilling its duty to say what the law is, a majority
of this court unconstitutionally converts the Wisconsin Elections
Commission’s mere advice into governing “law,” thereby supplanting
the actual election laws enacted by the people’s elected
representatives in the legislature and defying the will of
Wisconsin’s citizens. When the state’s highest court refuses to
uphold the law, and stands by while an unelected body of six
commissioners rewrites it, our system of representative government
is subverted.”

You are strongly urged to completely read the dissenting opinions.

They are powerful and should be spread throughout the land.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

Attorney Jordan Sekulow explains further.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Wisconsin indefinitely confined ballots require audit, Supreme court belatedly clarifies, 2 opinions filed Dec 14, Why did WI court wait until day of Trump ruling?

Posted on December 15, 2020 | 4 comments

Wisconsin indefinitely confined ballots require audit, Supreme court belatedly clarifies, 2 opinions filed Dec 14, Why did WI court wait until day of Trump ruling?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

On March 31, 2020 the Wisconsin Supreme Court filed the following ruling in Jefferson v Dane County:

“The temporary injunction the petitioners seek would order respondent, Scott McDonell, the Dane County Clerk, to remove a March 25, 2020 Facebook post in which he indicated, inter alia, that all Dane County voters could declare themselves to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2) due to illness solely because of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services Emergency
Order #12 (the Safer at Home Order) and difficulties in presenting or uploading a valid proof of identification, thereby avoiding the legal requirement to present or upload a copy of the voter’s proof of identification when requesting an absentee ballot. 1 The petitioners further ask this court
to order respondent McDonell and respondent Dane County to issue new statements setting forth the statutory interpretation proposed by the petitioners.”

In regard to clarification, the WEC has met and has issued guidance on the proper use of indefinitely confined status under Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2) in its March 29, 2020 publication, “Guidance for Indefinitely Confined Electors COVID-19.” The WEC guidance states as follows:

1. Designation of indefinitely confined status is for each individual voter to make
based upon their current circumstances. It does not require permanent or total
inability to travel outside of the residence. The designation is appropriate for
electors who are indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness or
infirmity or are disabled for an indefinite period.

2. Indefinitely confined status shall not be used by electors simply as a means to
avoid the photo ID requirement without regard to whether they are indefinitely
confined because of age, physical illness or infirmity, or disability.

We conclude that the WEC’s guidance quoted above provides the clarification on the purpose and proper use of the indefinitely confined status that is required at this time.”

https://www.wpr.org/sites/default/files/2020ap557-oa_3-31-20_order.pdf

On December 14, 2020, the day of the Electoral College vote, the Wisconsin Supreme Court filed 2 opinions.

Release date Case number Caption Select/view
Dec 14, 2020 2020AP002038 Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. Biden  PDF 
Dec 14, 2020 2020AP000557-OA Mark Jefferson v. Dane County, Wisconsin  PDF 

 

Trump, et al v Biden, et al

ON PETITION TO BYPASS COURT OF APPEALS, REVIEW
OF DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

Filed December 14, 2020.

“The Campaign focuses its objections on four different
categories of ballots——each applying only to voters in Dane County
and Milwaukee County. First, it seeks to strike all ballots cast
by voters who claimed indefinitely confined status since March 25,
2020.”

“The challenge to the indefinitely confined voter ballots
is meritless on its face, and the other three categories of ballots
challenged fail under the doctrine of laches.”

“The Campaign does not challenge the ballots of
individual voters. Rather, the Campaign argues that all voters
claiming indefinitely confined status since the date of the
erroneous Facebook advice should have their votes invalidated,
whether they are actually indefinitely confined or not. Although
the number of individuals claiming indefinitely confined status
has increased throughout the state, the Campaign asks us to apply
this blanket invalidation of indefinitely confined voters only to
ballots cast in Dane and Milwaukee Counties, a total exceeding 28,000 votes. The Campaign’s request to strike indefinitely
confined voters in Dane and Milwaukee Counties as a class without
regard to whether any individual voter was in fact indefinitely
confined has no basis in reason or law; it is wholly without merit.”

¶10 All three of these challenges fail under the
longstanding and well-settled doctrine of laches. “Laches is
founded on the notion that equity aids the vigilant, and not those
who sleep on their rights to the detriment of the opposing party.”
State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019 WI 110, ¶14, 389
Wis. 2d 516, 936 N.W.2d 587. Application of laches is within the
court’s discretion upon a showing by the party raising the claim
of unreasonable delay, lack of knowledge the claim would be raised,
and prejudice. Id., ¶15.

¶11 For obvious reasons, laches has particular import in the
election context. As one noted treatise explains:
Extreme diligence and promptness are required in
election-related matters, particularly where actionable election practices are discovered prior to the election.
Therefore, laches is available in election challenges.
In fact, in election contests, a court especially
considers the application of laches. Such doctrine is
applied because the efficient use of public resources
demands that a court not allow persons to gamble on the
outcome of an election contest and then challenge it
when dissatisfied with the results, especially when the
same challenge could have been made before the public is
put through the time and expense of the entire election
process. Thus if a party seeking extraordinary relief
in an election-related matter fails to exercise the
requisite diligence, laches will bar the action.”

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

The denial of tossing out all indefinitely confined ballots seems reasonable so as not to disenfranchise valid voters.

Not sure what this means:

The challenge to the indefinitely confined voter ballots
is meritless on its face”

And accusing the Trump challenge of violating the laches principle when viewed in light of the following, is interesting.

Filed also on December 14, 2020, when the oral argument was held September 29, 2020.

Jefferson, et al v Dane County, et al.

“(1) Respondents lack the authority to issue an
interpretation of Wisconsin’s election law allowing all electors
in Dane County to obtain an absentee ballot without a photo
identification and (2) Governor Evers’ Emergency Order #12
(“Emergency Order #12″) did not authorize all Wisconsin voters to
obtain an absentee ballot without a photo identification.”

“we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render
all Wisconsin electors “indefinitely confined,” thereby obviating
the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an
absentee ballot.”

“¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.”

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315283

Why was the above filed on December 14, 2020:

  • When oral arguments were on September 29, 2020.
  • Not before the election.
  • Long after the election.
  • On December 14, the day of the Electoral College vote.
  • And the same day as the Trump lawsuit denial.

???

This was after the Trump lawsuit was filed and heard and likely would have been quoted.

Anybody else reporting this?

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Trump likely wins Wisconsin, WI Supreme Court ruling Dec 14, “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.”

Posted on December 14, 2020 | 16 comments

Trump likely wins Wisconsin, WI Supreme Court ruling Dec 14, “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.”

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

Approx. 215,000 ballots were processed with the indication that the voter was “indefinitely confined,”

That is about 4 times as many cast in 2016.

The Wisconsin Supreme just ruled “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.”

If all of these ballots are audited, it is likely that enough should be thrown out due to clerk illegal action or outright fraud, to give the election to Trump.

From the Wisconsin Supreme Court December 14, 2020.

“B. Mootness
¶14 Respondents contend that their stipulation on questions
of law makes the issues presented herein moot. However, we are
not bound by stipulations on questions of law. State v. Olson,
127 Wis. 2d 412, 419, 380 N.W.2d 375 (Ct. App. 1985) (citing Swift
& Co. v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 243 U.S. 281, 289 (1917)). Rather,
we decide the legal issue at the heart of this controversy, i.e.,
the interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) in
the context presented.”

“Accordingly, we choose to address the issues presented.”

“1. Individual Determination
¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.

¶24 First, as a fundamental matter, county clerks are not to
interpret Wisconsin’s election laws and make declarations based on
those interpretations. It is the WEC that is responsible for
guidance in the administration and enforcement of Wisconsin’s
election laws, not the county clerks.”

Ҧ25 Next, as we stated above, whether to declare oneself
indefinitely confined is an individual determination. The plain
language of the statute does not permit persons other than the
elector to make that decision. We will not add words into a
statute that the legislature did not see fit to employ. See
Dawson, 336 Wis. 2d 318, ¶42 (citing County of Dane v. LIRC, 2009
WI 9, ¶33, 315 Wis. 2d 293, 759 N.W.2d 571). Therefore, neither
county clerks nor an order of the Governor may declare persons
indefinitely confined.”

Read more

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315283

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

16 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Electoral College vote must be put on hold immediately after Dominion test results public from Antrim Co, Not just a presidential vote issue, Also down ballot

Posted on December 14, 2020 | 3 comments

Electoral College vote must be put on hold immediately after Dominion test results public from Antrim Co, Not just a presidential vote issue, Also down ballot

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

The Electoral College vote must be put on hold immediately!

To continue is to commit fraud.

Dominion Voting Systems has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be unreliable.

The Antrim County Forensic Report is proof:

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/14/antrim-county-mi-dominion-voting-systems-test-results-report-dec-14-2020-judge-elseneheimer-ruling-results-of-the-antrim-county-2020-election-are-not-certifiable/

This is further corroborated by Colonel Phil Waldron.

DURING THE ELECTION REAL TIME.

Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.

The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.

Also from today’s Antrim County report:

“18. The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct
Cards were programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then
again after the election on 11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots
are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change
in voter results using the two different programs. In accordance with the Help
America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period which prohibits
changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without
undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State
Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as
determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory.

19. The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020
and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which
violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion
Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State
website are false.”

To continue with the Electoral College vote would be criminal.

Any state using Dominion Systems should be audited.

Remember, this is not just a presidential vote issue but also affects the down ballot.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer  ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”

Posted on December 14, 2020 | 5 comments

Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer  ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.     On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020

 

From the Antrim County Michigan Dominion Voting Systems

Forensics Report

Released December 14, 2020.

4. The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote “flip” from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.
5. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s statement on November 6, 2020 that “[t]the correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape . . . .” was false.
6. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.
7. The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error.
8. The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.
9. These errors occurred after The Antrim County Clerk provided a re-provisioned CF card with uploaded software for the Central Lake Precinct on November 6, 2020. This means the statement by Secretary Benson was false. The Dominion Voting System produced systemic errors and high error rates both prior to the update and after the update; meaning the update (or lack of update) is not the cause of errors.”

Read more:

file:///home/chronos/u-623cda1c93415fca1dbadecde758a20ad6a50704/MyFiles/Downloads/AntrimCountyReport.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Antrim County Mi court hearing watch live

Posted on December 14, 2020 | 5 comments

Antrim County Mi court hearing watch live

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.     On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020

“Evil and stupid is a bad combination.”…Citizen Wells

 

***  Update 12:00 Noon  ***

Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer  ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/14/antrim-county-mi-dominion-voting-systems-test-results-report-dec-14-2020-judge-elseneheimer-ruling-results-of-the-antrim-county-2020-election-are-not-certifiable/#comment-480436

***

“Later today, Attorney Matthew DePerno received word that 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elseneheimer would hear his case. Curiously, DePerno, who filed the emergency motion, found out about the hearing when he saw an article published by the far-left Detroit Free Press at 2:13 PM. DePerno then received an email from Antrim County attorney Haider Kazim at 2:50 PM and received notice directly from the Court at 3:02 PM. According to DePerno, the hearing will take place at 8:30 AM EST on Monday.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/14/dana-nessel-radical-michigan-ag-intimidation-threats-continue-why-is-she-panicking-over-dominion-test-report-now-threatening-mi-attorneys/

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

5 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys

Tagged

Dana Nessel radical Michigan AG intimidation threats continue, Why is she panicking over Dominion test report?, Now threatening MI attorneys

Posted on December 14, 2020 | 4 comments

Dana Nessel radical Michigan AG intimidation threats continue, Why is she panicking over Dominion test report?, Now threatening MI attorneys

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.     On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020

“Evil and stupid is a bad combination.”…Citizen Wells

 

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has apparently been overly concerned about revelations of election fraud and irregularities for weeks.

Now she is apparently panicking about a report of test results of Dominion Voting Systems.

From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.

From the Michigan election statutes:

168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.

(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.

168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.

remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,

It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”

Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.

From One America News November 10, 2020.

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.

On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/27/michigan-ag-dana-nessel-complicit-in-election-fraud-and-coverup-sidney-powell-lawsuit-numerous-witnesses-confirm-threatened-journalist-detroitleaks-video-authentic/

From Citizen Wells December 13, 2020.

“On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”

“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”

“DePerno waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant on Wednesday.”

“Later today, Attorney Matthew DePerno received word that 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elseneheimer would hear his case. Curiously, DePerno, who filed the emergency motion, found out about the hearing when he saw an article published by the far-left Detroit Free Press at 2:13 PM. DePerno then received an email from Antrim County attorney Haider Kazim at 2:50 PM and received notice directly from the Court at 3:02 PM. According to DePerno, the hearing will take place at 8:30 AM EST on Monday.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/13/antrim-county-mi-dominion-test-update-corrupt-ag-nessel-and-sos-benson-hide-results-protective-order-to-be-lifted-monday-guilty-dogs-bark-loudest/

From Gateway Pundit December 13, 2020.

“MI Attorney Responsible For Forensic Examination Of 16 Dominion Machines Gets Threatening Call From MI State Bar…Radical MI AG Nessel Threatens “MI Lawyers” Supporting Trump

Tomorrow at 8:30 AM, in Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court, Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer will decide if he will allow Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno of the DePerno Law Firm to release the Kraken.”

“On Wednesday, December 9, Matthew DePerno and his client, Mr. Bailey, waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel, who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant.”

“Today, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel tweeted a warning shot directed specifically at “Lawyers who practice in Michigan,” letting them know that their oath prevents them from filing “unjust and/or frivolous actions” or from misleading the court.

Fun fact: Lawyers who practice in Michigan are required to take an oath to support the MI and US Constitutions, not to file unjust and/or frivolous actions or mislead the court. The spate of Trump lawsuits in our state violates each of these tenets. It demeans our profession.

The brave patriot and Constitutional Attorney told The Gateway Pundit that he’s curious about the timing of Nessel’s tweet, and he wonders why “Attorney General Nessel is bringing the power of the state in to threaten attorneys?” He also told us that if Nessel is aware of misconduct by another attorney and isn’t reporting it, she is actually violating her oath by not reporting it.” DePerno told The Gateway Pundit, “Nessel’s only goal is to intimidate.””

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-attorney-responsible-forensic-examination-16-dominion-machines-gets-threatening-call-mi-state-bar-radical-mi-ag-nessel-threatens-mi-lawyers-supporting-trump/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,