Monthly Archives: October 2008

Obama born in Kenya, Obama Indonesian, Obama illegal alien, State election officials, Board of elections, Electors, US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws, Will Electoral College Electors vote for illegal alien?

Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Documented.

Barack Obama became an Indonesian citizen. Documented.

Barack Obama is an illegal alien. Documented.

No illegal alien has ever been on the US presidential ballot. Documented.

The US Constitution states the qualifications for president.

The US Constitution rules.

Federal Election Law: 

“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):

§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

State example: Pennsylvania Law

“§ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

Any state official, Governor, Lt Governor, Attorney General, Secretary
of State, Election Board Official. If you think you are absolved of
responsibility and are holding the DNC responsible, you are wrong. Many of you have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution. You may be subject to impeachment, expulsion and legal action. You have a duty to the US Constitution and the people of your state.

State election officials from the Secretaries of State and Election Boards
have been quoted as saying they take their cue from the DNC for candidates
placed on the ballot. That does not absolve them of responsibility.
They are bound to uphold the Constitution. These officials have been
forewarned. It is their duty to ensure that no voter in their state
is disenfranchised.

Electoral College Electors, knowingly voting for an ineligible candidate, will be violating the Constitution.
Woe to anyone with election powers, clinging to tradition, and blaming
the DNC for not vetting Obama. You have no excuse and will be held accountable.

US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws

Obama ineligible, Obama born in Kenya, Obama Indonesian, US Constitution, States, Secretary of State, Board of Elections, Electors, States must uphold US Constitution, 2008 Election

“In late December 1783, when General Washington resigned as commander in chief, he visited the Continental Congress for the last time…. General Washington read a brief statement praising the officers and soldiers of the Continental Army for their eight years of service. He also commended “our dear country to the protection of Almighty God.” As he said these words, his voice broke and tears streamed down the general’s cheeks and he was unable to speak for a full minute.”

From “Washington’s Secret War” by Thomas Fleming

“The collective wisdom of the founding fathers astounds me.”

Citizen Wells 

2008 Presidential Election

  States must uphold US Constitution

  

 

The DNC, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, et al ramroded Obama through the
DNC Convention and nomination.

Obama stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton. Documented evidence
reveals widespread voter fraud involving Acorn and the Obama camp in
the primaries and general election.

Barack Obama is not eligible to be president. He was born in Kenya and
became an Indonesian citizen. Obama is still Indonesian and is an illegal alien. There is ample proof of this and more is being revealed. Obama has failed to repudiate these facts.

Election officials and Electors in all 50 states and DC will be held
accountable to uphold the US Constitution
.

The Philip J Berg lawsuit will be taken to the Supreme court if necessary. Lawsuits are constrained by the level of proof placed on the plaintiff.
However, there is no such standard for those bound to uphold the
Constitution. Those swearing an oath of allegiance to the Constitution are being forewarned that with the oath comes a responsibility  and a higher level of recourse for violation of that oath. Consider the following:

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

Citizen Wells will be contacting the secretary of state or commonwealth
in all states and will email the following article that reveals the duties to uphold the Constitution:

US Constitution, Federal Election Laws, State Election Laws 

Each state will be notified of the article and the fact that they will be
held accountable. Taking their cue from the Democratic party or other
excuses will not be accepted. Each person sworn to uphold the Constitution will be personally held accountable. Citizen Wells also urges the citizens of each state to make known their desire to uphold the Constitution.

Below is a list of the 50 states and DC. As each state is contacted, this
article will be updated. Please comment with your information and concerns
about your state election officials and electors.

Alabama Emailed 10/27/08

Alaska Email 10/27/08

Arizona Email 10/28/08

Arkansas Email 10/27/08

California Email 10/27/08

Colorado Email 10/27/08

Connecticut Email 10/27/08

Delaware Email 10/28/08

Florida Telephone/email 10/27/08, Florida response – see comment below

Georgia Email 10/28/08

Hawaii Email 10/27/08

Idaho Email 10/27/08

Illinois

Indiana Email 10/28/08

Iowa Email 10/28/08

Kansas Email 10/28/08

Kentucky Email 10/28/08

Louisiana Email 10/28/08

Maine Email 10/28/08

Maryland Email 10/28/08

Massachusetts Email 10/28/08

Michigan Email 10/28/08

Minnesota Email 10/27/08

Mississippi Email 10/28/08

Missouri Email 10/27/08

Montana Email 10/28/08

Nebraska Email 10/28/08

Nevada Email 10/28/08

New Hampshire Email 10/28/08

New Jersey Email 10/28/08

New Mexico Email 10/27/08

New York Email 10/28/08

North Carolina Telephone/email 10/27/08

North Dakota Email 10/28/08

Ohio Email 10/28/08

Oklahoma Email 10/28/08

Oregon Email 10/28/08

Pennsylvania Telephone/email 10/27/08

Rhode Island Email 10/28/08

South Carolina Email 10/28/08

South Dakota Email 10/28/08

Tennessee Email 10/28/08

Texas Email 10/28/08

Utah Email 10/28/08

Vermont Email 10/28/08

Virginia    

Washington Email 10/28/08

West Virginia Email 10/28/08

Wisconsin Email 10/27/08

Wyoming Email 10/28/08

Dictrict of Columbia

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

Philip J Berg, Thank you Mr. Berg, Zach Jones blog, Constitutional crisis, Obama ineligible

From the Zach Jones Blog: 

“Philip Berg, Esq. is Standing Tall For All of Us

(Even Without The Blessings of the Lower Court)

I for one would like to say thank you Mr. Berg!

Dear Sir:

I want to publicly extend my deepest appreciation to you, Mr. Berg, for taking on the enormous Constitutional crisis that is facing America; the possibility that a person who might not be eligible, under the requirements set forth in our Constitution, to hold the office for which he is being allowed to run. If your allegations are found to have merit it will mean that Sen. Obama, knowingly solicited hundreds of million of dollars in campaign contributions under fault pretenses from unsuspecting American citizens and voters. It will mean that he and others conspired to keep this information secret and intentionally thwarted Sen. Clinton’s chances of becoming the first female President of the United States. Thank you for bringing this action, Sir.

Fortunately for us all, every now and again, a cause will come along that will stir the soul and passions. What cause could be more important that standing tall against those who could be seeking to undermine our legal system for electing the President of The United States of America? Who among us would challenge those of such power and wealth who could be trying to win an office for which they are not eligible? Who among us would take on a Senator, one with a historic candidacy, who is wildly popular by any standard? A lawyer who would take on such a case would certainly be led down roads that seem to go on forever, that are full of obstacles, and that usually demand going on with little support or understanding from neighbors, friends or even family. Thank you for your courage and determination.

As you well know, the case that goes against the fleeting public emotional attachment carries the most risk to the lawyer. If the person challenged by an attorney is highly revered, the lawyer becomes a lightening rod for attack; just as the exceedingly despised defendant, who is defended in court against the desires of the mob. For those who don’t fully appreciate what I’m trying to say, watch the movie – To Kill a Mockingbird. Thank you Mr. Berg for standing up for us, knowing that to win or lose such a case would exact a high price from you.

Thank you for having the courage to take Berg v. Obama all the way to the Supreme Court in your efforts to advert such a possible travesty of Justice.

To those of you who may not be aware, Sen. Obama could have easily defended his eligibility to hold the U. S. Presidency by merely presenting exclusive proof of where and when he was born; and that he has never held a citizenship from another country that would nullify or call his U. S. citizenship into question. Sen. Obama chose not to answer the complaint; but instead, he chose to take the route of a legal technocrat seeking to challenge Mr. Berg’s “Standing to Sue”. When Sen. McCain was questioned about his birth certificate, he immediately presented a vault copy of his birth certificate showing the date and location of his birth, without legal hocus pocus.

“Standing to Sue” means that party has sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable controversy to obtain judicial resolution of that controversy. Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U. S. 727, 92 S. Ct. 1361, 1364, 31 L.Ed.2d 636

The Hon. R. Barclay Surrick decided Sen. Obama’s Motion to Dismiss in part on the following reasoning:

…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election…

Everyone must fully understand the meaning of Judge Surrick’s decision in dismissing Mr. Berg’s lawsuit. First, it does not mean that Sen. Obama is in any way eligible to hold the Office of the Presidency. Second, it does mean that even if everyone knew that Sen. Obama was born on the moon, it would not matter regarding the decision about Sen. Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Judge Surrick found that a voter would not suffer enough injury by the possible election of an ineligible candidate as President to grant him or her standing to be authorized under law to bring this type of lawsuit. Third, this challenge to Sen. Obama’s eligibility is not over.

If Citizens exercising the most precious right that we have under the Constitution, in what is expected to a free and fair election process, do not have standing – who does?

I would suspect, and also pray, that you do in fact have standing and that the higher courts will reinstate your action against Sen. Obama, et alli. However, it wouldn’t hurt if some people who clearly have an even bigger stake in the outcome of Berg. v Obama would join with you as plaintiffs in the action.

Those I’m thinking about are Sen. John McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, Ralph Nader, Congressman Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, and the other candidates of the Democratic Primary. I want to publicly challenge each one of the people to stand with Phillip Berg, Esq., to prevent the possible election of a person who may not meet the requirements under the Constitution of The United States to hold the Office of the Presidency.

I also want to challenge each of you reading this thank you letter to contact the above named individuals and encourage them to take their “Standing” and stand up for America and its system of laws.

Even though this decision was to be expected, it must have weighed heavily on you, Mr. Berg. Thank you for bearing this disappointment for America with grace and continuing on.

I don’t know that there are any short cuts to doing a good job.
Sandra Day O’Connor

Sincerely,

Zach Jones, a/k/a ZachJonesIsHome.wordpress.com

Obama born in Kenya, Berg has evidence, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama’s grandmother tape, Grandson born in Kenya, Supreme Court appeal, US Constitution upheld

From African Website 2008

From African Website 2008

Citizen Wells received information from reliable sources earlier in
2008 that stated Obama was born in Kenya and that a Kenyan birth
certificate existed for Obama. Philip J Berg has a tape Of Obama’s
paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, stating she was present at Obama’s
birth in Kenya. Here is Berg’s comment:

“While the evidence presented by Berg was largely circumstantial, the attorney says that he is learning more about this narrative–and about the Democratic Party nominee for president–with each passing day. For example, regardless of whether it could be attached to the proceeding as it goes through the appellate process, Berg said, he is in possession of a native-language audiotape of Sarah Obama, Barack Obama’s paternal grandmother, stating on the day of the last presidential debate that her famous grandson was indeed born in Kenya, and that she was present in the hospital for his birth.

“The tape is in the native language there,” Berg said. “I will release it as soon as translation is confirmed by affidavit, and we are waiting on affidavits from contacts over here and in Kenya.””

Read more here: 
http://www.americasright.com/

Help Philip J Berg uphold the Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Obama not eligible to be president, US Constitution, Obama born in Kenya, Obama is Indonesian, Secretary of State, Board of elections, Electors, Accountable, Uphold Constitution, Citizen Wells to American public

“Our Constitution is in actual operation; everything appears to promise
that it will last; but nothing in this world is certain but death and
taxes.”

Benjamin Franklin

“A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high
duties of a good (officer), but it is not the highest. The laws of
necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger,
are of higher obligation.”

Thomas Jefferson

“The ballot is stronger than the bullet.”

Abraham Lincoln

Up to this point, the political parties and the individual states have been in control of the election process. The state boards of elections, in conjunction  with the major political parties have controlled which candidates will be on the ballots. However, the US Constitution still rules and just beneath that the Federal election laws rule. The states have control over their respective elections and electors, but are still governed by federal law.

Several weeks ago, Citizen Wells contacted the NC State Board of Elections.
After a brief phone call dominated by the Board of Elections staff member,
Citizen Wells was told that they had been aware of the Philip J Berg
lawsuit for several months and that they took their cue from the
Democratic Party regarding Obama’s eligibility. Once again, the US
Constitution rules and we will hold the NC State Board of Elections
accountable.

Once the individual state electors meet on December 15, 2008, the Federal
Government takes control of the process. Lawsuits in courts require
the burden of proof on the part of the plaintiff. This burden is not necessary
for those charged with upholding and defending the Constitution.
Consider the following:

Both John McCain and Barack Obama are US Senators. When they took office they spoke the following pledge:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW

“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):”

“§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

Pennsylvania Law

“§ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon them by the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

NC Law

“At the first meeting held after new appointments are made, the members of the State Board of Elections shall take the following oath:

“I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, and that I will well and truly execute the duties of the office of member of the State Board of Elections according to the best of my knowledge and ability, according to law, so help me, God.””
“§ 163-114.  Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring after nomination and before election.

If any person nominated as a candidate of a political party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary) dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the following instructions:
Position

President 

Vacancy is to be filled by appointment of national executive
committee of political party in which vacancy occurs”

This is not a situation where Obama is on trial and the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.

The government of the US has not filed a lawsuit with the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff.

Barack Obama is running for the office of president of the US, This is no different than applying for any other job involving competition.
As in any other situation involving a job application, the burden of
proof regarding qualification to hold office, falls on Obama. The
rules are spelled out in the US Constitution. The preponderance of
evidence reveals that Obama was born in Kenya, became an Indonesian
citizen and is in fact an illegal alien. Those who choose to ignore
these facts and allow Obama to proceed are violating the law and
will be held accountable.

Regardless of how the Philip J Berg lawsuit plays out, the US Constitution
must be upheld. Many people involved in the election process are
charged with upholding the US Constitution and will be held accountable.
This article will be emailed to the Secretary of State in each state
after a phone call to explain that the citizens are watching them. The
individual electors will also be held accountable. The Citizen Wells
blog will also create an accountability page for each state and will
provide feedback on how each state cooperates with the letter and spirit
of the Constitution.

I urge all of you to contact your Secretary of State and Board of Elections
in your state. Let them know you do not want an illegal alien on the
ballot or voted for by state electors. While you are at it, let them
know that voter fraud will not be tolerated. Let us know about the level
of concern and cooperation in your state.

The Philip J Berg lawsuit Timeline can be accessed at the top of this blog.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Berg appealing to US Supreme Court, October 25, 2008, Obama not qualified to be president, Standing challenged

Philip J Berg is appealing his lawsuit dismissal to the US Supreme Court. Here is Mr. Berg’s news release:

“Press Release: Berg v. Obama dismissed – Berg appealing to U. S. Supreme Court
Saturday, 25 October 2008 16:51 administrator Main – News    Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

For Immediate Release: – 10/25/08 – Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It’s a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

# # #

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it”

Read more here:

http://obamacrimes.com

Judge Surrick Dismisses Berg lawsuit, Philip J Berg, Jeff Schreiber analysis

Judge Surrick dismissed the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is Indonesian and not eligible to be president. Jeff Schreiber has provided some information on Judge Surrick’s ruling:

“Saturday, October 25, 2008
Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
 
The order came down at approximately 6:15 p.m. on Friday. Philip Berg’s lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States had been dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lacked standing.

Surrick, it seemed, was not satisfied with the nature of evidence provided by Berg to support his allegations.
Various accounts, details and ambiguities from Obama’s childhood form the basis of Plaintiff’s allegation that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States. To support his contention, Plaintiff cites sources as varied as the Rainbow Edition News Letter … and the television news tabloid Inside Edition. These sources and others lead Plaintiff to conclude that Obama is either a citizen of his father’s native Kenya, by birth there or through operation of U.S. law; or that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia by relinquishing his prior citizenship (American or Kenyan) when he moved there with his mother in 1967. Either way, in Plaintiff’s opinion, Obama does not have the requisite qualifications for the Presidency that the Natural Born Citizen Clause mandates. The Amended Complaint alleges that Obama has actively covered up this information and that the other named Defendants are complicit in Obama’s cover-up.”

 

“So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.

If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”

 

“Berg’s attempts to distinguish his own case from Hollander were deemed by Judge Surrick to be “[h]is most reasonable arguments,” but his arguments citing statutory authority were said by the judge to be a venture “into the unreasonable” and were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.” All in all, the judge wrote, it was the satisfaction of the injury-in-fact requirement which was the problem. Berg’s harm was simply too intangible.

…regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election.

Berg, disappointed by the decision, plans to appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and then to the United States Supreme Court.

“This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution,” Berg said. “If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States–the most powerful man in the entire world–is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?””

Read more here:

http://www.americasright.com/

The Constitution must be upheld.

Citizen Wells will post an article in the next 48 hours with an action plan.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Judge Surrick dismissed, October 24, 2008 ruling, Philadelphia Daily News

The Philadelphia Daily News has stated that Judge Surrick has ruled on the Philip J Berg Lawsuit. Judge Surrick allegedly ruled on the lawsuit last night, October 24, 2008. I have it on authority that the writer of the article, Michael Hinkelman, is a “rabid Obama supporter.” Mr Hinkelman does indeed publish gross inaccuracies (lies where I come from) about the case. The informed reader will immediately spot them.

Go ahead and read the biased account from the Philadelphia Daily News, the same newspaper that did not touch this story until the case was dismissed, and then read a more factual, authoritative account here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Here are some exerpts from the article:

“Posted on Sat, Oct. 25, 2008
Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News

hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.”

Read more here:

http://www.philly.com/dailynews

Here are Citizen Wells’ thoughts on the ruling:

  • The US Constitution rules. Judge Surrick is bound to uphold the Constitution.
  • Thousands of voters were disenfranchised during the Democratic Primaries.
  • Thousands more voters will be disenfranchised if Obama is allowed to remain on the ballot.
  • As the election progresses, control of the election process will shift from the states to the Federal Government. The following officials will be bound to uphold the Constitution:
  1. Secretary of State of each state.
  2. Election Board Officials.
  3. Electors.
  4. Governors.
  5. Judges.
  • All of the above officials will be held accountable.
  • Taking a cue from the Democratic Party will not be a valid excuse for not upholding the Constitution and allowing Obama, an illegal alien, to remain on the ballot or be voted for by electors.

Philip J Berg will appeal Judge Surrick’s decision and take the case to the Supreme Court if necessary. The Citizen Wells blog will produce an article soon to help clarify how the Constitution must be upheld. In conjunction with the American public, we will hold all responsible for the election, accountable.

Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Andy Martin, New York, News conference, October 24, 2008, Obama investigation, Hawaii birth certificate, NBC News, Colin Powell, Tom Brokaw

Andy Martin is in New York, back from his investigation of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Here is the latest release from Martin:

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
 
INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN LANDS IN NEW YORK TO PLAN NEW STRATEGY FOR DEALING WITH BARACK OBAMA, COLIN POWELL AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA
 
INTERNET POWER BEGINS TO DRIVE THE “TWO ELECTIONS OF 2008”
 
ANDY SAYS NBC NEWS’ TREATMENT OF COLIN POWELL IS EVIDENCE OF “TWO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS” IN 2008
 
(NEW YORK)(October 24, 2008) Internet powerhouse Andy Martin has landed in New York and will hold a news conference Friday afternoon, October 24th (today) to disclose plans for the final week of his efforts to “tell the truth about Barack Obama.” Martin is the author of “Obama: The Man behind The Mask.”
 
“When we conceived our investigative trip to Hawai’i last month, no media or writers had been to Hawai’i to dig into the truth about ‘the hidden Obama’ or his secret ‘birth certificate’ that no one has ever seen. Now everyone is buying tickets to Honolulu, even my competing authors, see http://wnd.com/index.php?fa= PAGE.view&pageId=78954. We have given Hawai’i tourism a boost. We have started a ‘rush to land’ in Hawai’i.
 
“Every Barack Obama showed up in Honolulu, looking for his ‘true’ birth certificate. Will wonders never cease?
 
“The very fact that we promoted a pioneering investigation of Obama’s past in Hawai’i, and that others are now following our lead, confirms that we have created the Internet powerhouse of
2008.
 
“But the hour is late; today we announce our general plans for the final days of the campaign to tell the truth about Senator Obama.
 
“I would be remiss if I also did not express my extreme dismay at the mainstream media’s latest act of malpractice,  ‘Republican’ Quisling Colin Powell’s appearance on NBC.
 
“The Powell affair explains a great deal about media reality in 2008. We have two presidential election campaigns being conducted simultaneously: one by the mainstream media to force feed us Barack Obama, and one on the internet where truth generally prevails, with notable exceptions, and where Obama is not our uncrowned king.
 
“What has become increasingly apparent to me is that a vast segment of the electorate has completely tuned out traditional media and has come to rely exclusively on Internet powerhouses such as ContrarianCommentary.com. Advertisers be warned.
 
“When you see turncoat and racial huckster Colin Powell being given an uncritical platform on NBC news to stab his ‘friend’ John McCain in the back, you know why the American people have tuned out the broadcast media and stopped turning to the print media. Tom Brokaw has morphed from a respected journalist into an Obama whore.
 
“The Republican Party made Colin Powell and promoted him to the highest offices in the land. How did he repay Republicans? By stabbing the party in the back. Fortunately for me, I was never a member of the ‘cult’ of Colin Powell. I always saw through him as the ass kisser and mediocre military man he was.
 
“Had Powell previously made any of his criticisms known in speeches to party leaders, or at party functions? Not a word. He just waited until the last minute, when Obama appears to be leading, to start ass kissing and start looking for a new job to burnish his tarnished reputation.
 
“Did Brokaw press Powell with probing questions? Not on your life. They were two lovers on Meet The Press. Powell went on national television and smeared the party with an unfiltered attack on John McCain.
 
“Ironically, I tend to agree with some of Powell’s observations. But both parties are being run by their extremist wings: right-wing Republicans and left-wing Democrats.
 
“It is the manner of Powell’s betrayal, and NBC News’ function as a megaphone for Obama propaganda, that I find despicable. The presentation of Powell’s message uncritically and without probing demolishes NBC’s credibility. Going on TV to trash the party that made him is a true indicator of what a sycophant and brownnoser Powell always was. That Tom Brokaw would allow this ‘news’ charade to be presented under his name shows why people no longer trust and no longer believe and no longer are turning to the mainstream media for election information.
 
“Where was Powell’s backbone when he could have helped stop the Iraq war by forcefully speaking out? I am a Republican and I marched in the streets of Washington and New York to protest the imminent attacks. But Powell was more concerned with ‘polishing’ his legacy than with being a true leader in 2003. Now he is groveling to Barack Obama at the eleventh hour, hoping to snare a few crumbs from the Democrats. I would like to see Obama lose just to keep Powell out of office. Powell is despicable.
 
“Instead of challenging Powell’s perfidiousness, the mainstream media have been parroting and promoting him. No wonder people tune out this propaganda. Powell is the mainstream media’s designated Republican backstabber. He had jelly in his spine in Viet-Nam; he had jelly in his spine in 1991. He lied to the American people in 2003, and now he is groveling to Barack Obama and looking for a new handout at the highest levels of government.
 
“I give Powell a ‘Bronx cheer’ in honor of his birthplace. Powell and his megaphones in the mainstream media are the reason there are two election campaigns being conducted, one on the Internet where truth is the goal, and one in the mainstream media where liberal lies are the currency,” Martin will state.
 
NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:
 
WHO:     
 
National anti-Obama leader and Obama Author Andy Martin   
 
WHAT:    
 
National anti-Obama leader Andy Martin announces plans for the final week of the anti-Obama movement
WHERE:
 
909 Third Avenue, public sidewalk in front of FDR Station, New York 
           
WHEN: Friday, October 24, 6:00 P. M.
 
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329
 
TO PURCHASE BOOK: Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies from http://www.OrangeStatePress.com
 
ANDY E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com”

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Greta Van Sustern, Birth Certificate, Berg lawsuit, Media coverage, Rush Limbaugh, Greta

Finally we have coverage of the Philip J Berg lawsuit by major media players. Rush Limbaugh has mentioned the lawsuit and now Greta Van Sustern has a proposal to address the birth certificate issue. The Zach Jones blog has an article about Greta’s proposal:

“Friday, October 24, 2008
Greta Van Susteren is Breaking Media Silence about Berg v Obama
This morning Greta Van Susteren opened a small crack in the media silence concerning the Berg v Obama lawsuit. Greta made the suggestion that all four candidates submit valid birth certificates to help prove they meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President of The United States. I agree that this would be a great first step. However, Sen. Obama also needs to address the other allegations raised in Berg v Obama.

Here is Greta’s Post:

OK … the internet rumors about the birth certificate: let’s end the rumors and the viral nature of them!
by Greta Van Susteren
Of course I know about all the internet gossip about Senator Obama’s birth. Many of you (thousands?) have written me saying he was not born in the USA ( a Constitutional requirement for President) …. the rumors are flying around the internet and overloading my inbox and is viral. It doesn’t stop! I have thought the emails a waste of keyboard time and have ignored them.

However, since the emails just won’t stop…and since it really is a topic that should be put to rest and can be done with such ease, I now think Senator Obama should release his birth certificate but I also think, to be fair, so should the other 3….yes, all 4.

So, let’s have it! All 4 need to release their birth certificates to prove each was born in the USA and thus constitutionally able to serve as President. Let’s insist that all 4 release birth certificates and put the matter to rest! (and yes, stop the emails to me!)

Until this is done, the rumors simply will not stop and rumors are not fair…it is not fair to Senator Obama and he also should not be blackmailed into producing the records…so, if all 4 must produce, that seems fair.

Let’s see them….and then let’s move on.

END of Greta’s Post

I want to suggest that everyone post Greta’s suggestion everywhere to get people to flood Greta’s site and let her know just how many Berg supporter’s are out there.”

Read more here:

http://zachjonesishome.blogspot.com/2008/10/greta-van-susteren-is-breaking-media.html