Tag Archives: The Case Against Barack Obama

Obama, Abortion, Joseph Mengele, Nazi Final Solution, David Freddoso, The Case Against Barack Obama, Obama pro abortion, Non persons, Illinois Senate Bill, Playing God, Pro abortion candidate

“Barack Obama is the most pro abortion candidate ever.”
Terence P. Jeffrey

“But, he argues, we cannot legally recognize them as “persons.”
Because if we do, then somewhere down the road it might threaten someone’s right to an abortion.”

David Freddoso on Obama

History can and does repeat itself. The evil capacity of humans
passes from generation to generation. Left unchecked, this evil
can grow to levels experienced before in history.

This blog has produced multiple articles about the similarities
between the Obama Campaign and Nazi Germany. There is another common
thread that is  more alarming than the other similarities.
It is the disregard for human life and attempting to play the role
of God, which we are so incapable of. Obama has a consistent position
on abortion that panders to his base, the far left. Despite Obama
playing to the middle of the country and pretending to have Christian
values, his position is a matter of record. No amount of lying and
revisionist history can erase it.

The Nazi final solution focused on the Jews but also embraced the
concept of cleansing undesirable elements of society. No practitioner
of this philosophy is a better example than Joseph Mengele. Here is
a small sample of his evil, twisted regard for human life:

“In charge of the “selections” process, he’d show up at the prisoner transports looking quite elegant, and would decide at a glance each person’s destiny.  If anyone started trouble over being separated from a relative, he might wordlessly beat or shoot them both.  He appeared to have no conscience, and sent anyone with an imperfection (including imperfect height) right to the gas chamber.  However, he kept the twins, as many sets of doubles as he could find.  They were destined for his labs.

Mengele enjoyed his powerful position and was completely at home with his tasks.  To uphold the Nazi ideal of racial purification was his driving motivation.  Yet no one quite knew what to expect.  Even as he separated families and killed with impunity, he might step into the role of concerned physician and whimsically allow some people to live.  The power of life and death resided in him.

In his desire to improve the efficiency of the camp as a killing machine, he taught other doctors how to give phenol injections to a long line of prisoners, quickly ending their lives.  He also shot people, and by some reports he tossed live babies into the crematoria.  Throughout all of this, he kept a detached, efficient demeanor and viewed himself as strictly a scientist.”

Read more here:

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/weird/doctors/index_1.html
 
Now, many years later, consider the following exerpts from David
Freddoso’s book, “The Case Against Barack Obama.”

“She had been told to take this baby and leave him in a soiled utility closet.”
“In leaving born babies to die without treatment, Christ Hospital was
doing nothing illegal under the laws of Illinois. Doctors had no
ethical obligation to treat them. Under the law, they were non persons.”
“There was no legal conflict between O’Malley’s bill and the right to
legal abortion, but Barack Obama nonetheless had problems with it.
He was a liberal, a proponent of legalized abortion.

Here are Obama’s words in the Illinois Senate in 2001 speaking
against Illinois’s born alive protection bill:

“There was some suggestion that we might be able to craft something
that might meet constitional muster with respect to caring for
fetuses or children who were delivered in this fashion. Unfortunately,
this bill goes a little bit further, and so I just want to suggest,
not that I think it’ll make too much difference with respect to how
we vote, that this is probably not going to survive constitutional
scrutiny. Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person
that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements
in the Constitution , what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they
are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a–a child, a nine month old–child that was delivered to term
. That determination then, essentially, if it is accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.”

While we are not suggesting that Obama is of the calibre of Joseph
Mengele, the following similarities are glaring:

The cold, calculating manner of describing human life.

Deciding who lives and who dies.

A policy of evaluating human worth based on a political agenda.

Ultimately, playing God and doing a poor job of it.

If you are as concerned about Barack Obama as we are, voice your
concern here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Advertisement

The Case Against Barack Obama, Abortion, Live Birth, David Freddoso, Obama lies, Lobbyists control Obama, Babies not persons to Obama, Obama deeds, Obama words, Obama a Christian?

Obama is documented as being the most liberal member of the senate. Obama claims to have no ties to lobbyists. Obama claims to be a Christian, but his words to not match his deeds.

David Freddoso is the author of “The Case Against Barack Obama.” He has devoted a chapter to Obama’s stance and record on abortion, “Abortion: Barack Obama’s America.” Here are some exerpts from Freddoso’s book:

“She had been told to take this baby and leave him in a soiled utility
closet.”

“Stanek offered to take the baby instead.
“I couldn’t let him die alone,” she says. “And so I held him for the forty five minutes that he lived. He moved a little bit. Of course he didn’t cry.””

“Prior to that incident, she learned that Christ (hospital) is aligned
with two Christian denominations that support legal abortion–as it
happens, one of them is Barack Obama’s former denomination, the United
Church of Christ.”

“In leaving born babies to die without treatment, Christ Hospital was
doing nothing illegal under the laws of Illinois. Doctors had no
ethical obligation to treat them. Under the law, they were non persons.”

Stanek’s state senator, Patrick O’Malley introduced three bills. Senate Bill 1095 is the more important and defined babies born alive as “persons.”

“There was no legal conflict between O’Malley’s bill and the right to
legal abortion, but Barack Obama nonetheless had problems with it.
He was a liberal, a proponent of legalized abortion.

“In June 2001, three months after Obama’s first speech against the Illinois bill, the United States Senate voted on the language of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.”

“On June 29, 2001, liberal senator Barbara Boxer of California spoke
in favor of this bill:

“Of course, we believe everyone born should deserve the protection
of this bill…Who could be more vulnerable than a newborn baby? So,
of course, we agree with that…We join with an “aye” vote on this.
I hope it will, in fact, be unanimous.”
It was unanimous, 98-0.
This same bill that Boxer was praising came before Barack Obama’s
health committee two years later, in 2003. As chairman, he bottled it
up in committee and killed it.”

We urge you to read the complete chapter by David Freddoso.
Obama’s deeds are not that of a Christian.

The No Quarter USA blog has an article about Obama’s stance on abortion and David Freddoso’s book. Here are some exerpts:

“Obama’s devotees explained his state senate votes (actually, they ranted) by informing me that it was what Planned Parenthood had TOLD him to do. (Let me get this right: A lobbying group instructed him? And he just blindly went along?”

“The senator is right. Someone is lying.

And now it is left to the Democratic party to clean up the mess it has created for itself.

Good luck, DNC. You’re going to need it.

You did not properly vet this man.

You ignored articles such as mine and Larry Johnson’s.

We were not consumed with hatred, as you chose to believe.

We were genuinely worried that you were missing the opportunity to elect a truly qualified candidate whose life was already an open book, and who wouldn’t be subjected to the fact-checking in the HEAT of a post-primary presidential campaign.

Have you forgotten that the entire purpose of a long primary contest is to VET THE CANDIDATES?

Have you forgotten that the importance of a LONG primary contest is to give people the time needed to stop “falling in love” with a candidate — to get past the honeymoon phase — and to really take a HARD look at the candidate?

Here’s a news flash: Not only is the honeymoon over, but you are walking down the aisle and into a BAD MARRIAGE.

But note that I just wrote that you are still “walking down the aisle.”

There is time to turn around and walk out.

You have precisely one week left to come to your senses.”

Read more here:

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/18/finally-personal-vindication-but-a-major-new-problem-for-the-democratic-party/
The blog, Zach Jones is Home, has done an excellent job of describing what abortion is all about. Make sure you read more here:

http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/obama-would-evidently-throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater/

Are you still planning to vote for Obama? Do you believe Obama is a Christian? Are you a Christian? Read this article from this blog:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/mccain-and-obama-face-questions-about-faith-rick-warren-saddleback-church-obama-and-christian-life-obama-the-muslim-islam-background-islam-agenda-obama-a-political-christian-fair-weather-chris/

Voice your concern about Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

The Case Against Barack Obama, Dan Shomon, Robert Blackwell, David Freddoso, Killerspin, Illinois State Grants, Legal retainer, Money Laundering, LA Times article

One of the least reported aspects of Obama’s past and his ties to
corruption and dubious business associations is the Robert Blackwell
“legal retainer” in conjunction with Dan Shomon. The LA Times broke
this story back in April 2008. They referred to Dan Shomon as an
Obama campaign aide. This blog, Citizen Wells, dug deeper into the
role of Dan Shomon. Dan Shomon was actually Obama’s Campaign Manager
at one time and he was also  a lobbyist. Dan Shomon’s name is at
the top of an announcement of Robert Blackwell being on Governor
Rod Blagojevich’s team. Blagojevich was named often during the Tony
Rezko trial and has been the subject of a recall attempt in Illinois.
Robert Blackwell contacted this blog shortly after we presented
our article in April 2008.

David Freddoso has written a new book, “The Case Against Barack Obama.
Freddoso, to his credit, writes about the Dan Shomon connection. He
does not cover Shomon as well as this blog so we recommend that you
search on Shomon here and learn more. Here are some exerpts from
“The Case Against Barack Obama”:
“Perhaps the most surprising story about Barack obama and money is one that no one talks about at all.  It involves ping-pong.  it is the story of how state Senator Obama was paid more than $100,000 for legal work, then helped his client’s company get $320,000 in taxpayer grants. 
For some reason, only the Los Angeles Times has examined the story of Robert Blackwell Jr. and the government grants he received after he invested in Barack Obama.

Obama writes in The Audacity of Hope that after his failed congressional run in 2000, he was “more or less broke.”  His family would make $240,000 that year, but they had large debts, and he had just loaned his losing campaign $9,500 and maxed out his credit card.  To keep his family afloat, he writes, he went back after the election to his law firm, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, which he had neglected throughout 2000 (he received no income from the firm that year).  He planned to do some legal work to supplement his modest $58,000 salary as a state senator.

In 2001, while serving as a state senator, Obama would earn $98,158 from his law practice.  Of that money, $80,000 came from a single client – Electronic Knowledge Interchange (EKI)-which had put him on a $8,000 monthly retainer.  This lasted fourteen months and netted Obama $112,000.  The company was owned by one Robert Blackwell Jr., a friend of Obama’s since about 1995.

Months after Obama received his final payment from EKI, he wrote a request on Illinois Senate letterhead and sent it to state officials for a $50,000 tourism grant to a company named Killerspin. This company was also owned by Blackwell.

Killerspin runs ping-pong tournaments and sells ping-pong gear.  After Obama’s original request, Killerspin received a $20,000 grant for a ping-pong tournament.  Over the next three years, Obama’s aide Dan Shoman-who was working for the senator part-time and part-time for Blackwell-would help Killerspin get a $200,000 state grant for its 2003 tournament and a $100,000 state grant for its 2004 tournament, for a total of $320,000.

So Blackwell’s company paid Senator Obama a large sum of money.  Blackwell’s other company received almost three times as much in state grants, with help from Obama and his aide.

The Times reports that Obama, in his required legal financial disclosures, buried his six-figure financial conflict of interest amid a list of hundreds of other clients represented by his law firm.  He did not mention that the majority of his 2001 income came from EKI-nor was he required to do so under Illinois law.  Moreover, the Times piece notes:

The business arrived at an especially fortuitious time because, as the law firm’s senior partner, Judson Miner, put it, “it was a very dry period here,” meaning that the ebb and flow of cases left little work for Obama and cash was tight.”

This corruption connection is listed on the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org