Tag Archives: 2020

Trump v Boockvar PA SOS et al US Supreme Court filed December 20, 2020, ” statutory provisions…may not be ignored by state election officials or changed by state courts”

Trump v Boockvar PA SOS et al US Supreme Court filed December 20, 2020, ” statutory provisions…may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts”

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“Big news coming out of Pennsylvania. Very big illegal ballot drop that cannot be accounted for. Rigged Election!”...President Trump December 21, 2020
“Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.” PA House Resolution 1094

 

From

DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.,

v

Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, et al

Filed in the US Supreme Court December 20, 2020.

“Article II of the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint [electors
for President and Vice President] in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may
direct.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). That power is “plenary,” and the statutory provisions enacted by the legislature in the furtherance of that
constitutionally-assigned duty may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts. Bush v. Gore (“Bush II”), 531 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2000).

Yet, during the 2020 presidential election, that is what the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court did in four cases – three at issue in this Petition, and one already
before the Court. Statutory requirements were eliminated regarding signature
verification, the right of campaigns to challenge invalid mail ballots, mandates that mail voters fill in, date, and sign mail ballot declarations, and even the right of campaigns to observe the mail ballot canvassing process in a meaningful way.

Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania
Legislature. According to public reports, without these protections, the resulting
disqualification rate of invalid ballots was anemic—meaning over 110,000 invalid ballots were illegally counted—more than enough to have affected the outcome of the election, where the margin between the two principal candidates for President currently stands at 80,558. The questions presented are therefore:

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-boockvar-petition.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell US Supreme Court motion to consolidate and expedite Michigan Georgia and Arizona and Wisconsin petitions, December 18, 2020

Sidney Powell US Supreme Court motion to consolidate and expedite Michigan Georgia and Arizona and Wisconsin petitions, December 18, 2020

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.

“Attorney Sidney Powell recently stated her cases were being “slow walked” by the SCOTUS. Justice Roberts should be recused.”...Citizen Wells

 

From the Sidney Powell motion to the 

US Supreme Court

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF THE EMERGENCY PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, TO EXPEDITE MERITS BRIEFING AND ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE EVENT THAT THE COURT GRANTS THE PETITION, AND TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF THIS MOTION

Filed December 18, 2020

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 21, Petitioners respectfully move for
consolidation and expedited consideration of two related filings, submitted
December 11, 2020, that concern the November 3, 2020, presidential election.
These filings have direct implications for the outcome of the election nationwide.

The first of the filings concerns the presidential election conducted in the
State of Michigan and was assigned Docket Number 20-815 (the “Michigan
Petition”). The Michigan Petition seeks emergency declaratory relief avowing that the presidential election results certified by Michigan officials were unconstitutional and otherwise contrary to law, together with injunctive relief de-certifying those results.

The second filing, Docket Number 20-816, parallels the first and concerns the
presidential election in Georgia (the “Georgia Petition”). The Georgia Petition seeks declaratory and injunctive relief similar to that requested in the Michigan Petition.

Under the briefing schedules established by this Court’s rules, the Michigan
and Georgia Petitions would not be briefed until January 14, 2020 at the earliest;
and in the event the Court were to grant review, the cases would not be argued and decided until Spring 2021 at the earliest. In the meantime, Petitioners claims will have changed beyond recognition and will very likely have become moot. On January 6, 2020, Congress is scheduled to meet in Joint Session to count electoral votes from, and perhaps certify a winner of, the 2020 General Election—an election irredeemably tainted by multi-state election fraud and malign foreign interference.

Petitioners respectfully request (1) that the Court consolidate the Michigan
and Georgia Petitions (together with similar petitions from Arizona and Wisconsin discussed below); and (2) expedite consideration of all four petitions. The expedited schedule proposed below would allow the Court to adjudicate the cases in advance of January 6, 2020 Joint Session of Congress.

Petitioners further request expedited consideration of this motion.”

“CONCLUSION
For reasons stated, Petitioners respectfully request that the Court
consolidate and expedite consideration of the Michigan and Georgia Petitions (and Arizona and Wisconsin Petitions).”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-815/164119/20201218094817656_SCOTUS.FINAL..GA.MI.Motion%20for%20Expedited%20Consideration.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Navarro voter fraud report in 2020 election “The Immaculate Deception” “irregularities across six key battleground states”, Dec 17, 2020

Navarro voter fraud report in 2020 election “The Immaculate Deception” “irregularities across six key battleground states”, Dec 17, 2020

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.

 

From the Peter Navarro report on the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election.

“Executive Summary

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations,1 testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and
legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.

The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.”

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the observed patterns of election irregularities are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election outright, strategically game the election
process in such a way as to “stuff the ballot box” and unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket. Topline findings of this report include:

 The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities.

 The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.

All six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election irregularities. However, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/488495896/Navarro-Report#download&from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer  ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”

Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer  ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.     On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020

 

From the Antrim County Michigan Dominion Voting Systems

Forensics Report

Released December 14, 2020.

4. The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote “flip” from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.
5. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s statement on November 6, 2020 that “[t]the correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape . . . .” was false.
6. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.
7. The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error.
8. The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.
9. These errors occurred after The Antrim County Clerk provided a re-provisioned CF card with uploaded software for the Central Lake Precinct on November 6, 2020. This means the statement by Secretary Benson was false. The Dominion Voting System produced systemic errors and high error rates both prior to the update and after the update; meaning the update (or lack of update) is not the cause of errors.”

Read more:

file:///home/chronos/u-623cda1c93415fca1dbadecde758a20ad6a50704/MyFiles/Downloads/AntrimCountyReport.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

From the Donald Trump 

Motion to Intervene in

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

And

Bill of Complaint in Intervention

“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860.There is a high level of distrust between the opposing
sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state
elections in compliance with state election law, in direct violation of the plenary power that Article II of the U.S. Constitution confers on the Legislatures of
the States. Indeed, a recent poll by the reputable Rasmussen polling firm indicates that 47% of all Americans (including 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats), believe that it is “likely” or “very likely” the election was stolen from the current incumbent President.1”

“In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the
United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.

As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the
few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Georgia lawsuit: Trump v Brad Raffensperger et al Dec 4, 2020, “significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities”, “emergency temporary restraining order”

Georgia lawsuit: Trump v Brad Raffensperger et al Dec 4, 2020, “significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities”, “emergency temporary restraining order”

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

From Trump v Brad Raffensperger,  et al 

Filed December 4, 2020 in the

Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia.

“In this case, Petitioners present to this Court substantial evidence that the November 3, 2020, Presidential Election in Georgia (the “Contested Election”) was not conducted in accordance with the Election Code and that the named Respondents deviated significantly and substantially from the Election Code.

Due to significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities occurring during the election process, many thousands of illegal votes were cast, counted, and included in the tabulations from the Contested Election for the Office of the President of the United States, thereby creating substantial doubt regarding the results of that election.”

“The Election Code in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-522 provides the means for a candidate in a federal election to contest the results of said election based on:

1. Misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by any primary or election official or officials
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result;
2. When the defendant is ineligible for the nomination or office in dispute;
3. When illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result;
4. For any error in counting the votes or declaring the result of the primary or
election, if such error would change the results; or
5. For any other cause which shows that another was the person legally nominated, elected, or eligible to compete in a run-off primary or election.2

The results of an election may be set aside when a candidate has “clearly established a violation of election procedures and has demonstrated that the violation has placed the result of the election in doubt.” Martin v. Fulton Cty. Bd. of Registration & Elections, 307 Ga. 193-94, 835 S.E.2d 245, 248 (2019) (quoting Hunt v. Crawford, 270 GA 7, 10, 507 S.E.2d 723 (1998) (emphasis added).”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-petition-to-contest-georgia-election.pdf

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Arizona legislature calls for audit of Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County Dec 4, 2020, “A significant number of voters believe that fraud occurred”

Arizona legislature calls for audit of Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County Dec 4, 2020, “A significant number of voters believe that fraud occurred”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From the Arizona legislature press release December 4, 2020 calling for an audit of Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County.

“Senate President Karen Fann and Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers today called an independent audit of the Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the 2020 General Election. The two leaders, along with incoming Senate Government Chair Michelle Ugenti-Rita and House Majority Leader Warren Petersen, had numerous phone calls with members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,”

“A significant number of voters believe that fraud occurred and with the number of irregularities it is easy to understand why. Especially concerning are the allegations made surrounding the vendor Dominion.”

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Arizona post certification GOP challenge audit update Dec 4, 2020, Maricopa county selected only 60% of 2500 allowed sample & still found .5% errors

Arizona post certification GOP challenge audit update Dec 4, 2020, Maricopa county selected only 60% of 2500 allowed sample & still found .5% errors

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From Dr. Kelli Ward Arizona GOP chair person December 4, 2020.

“In today’s update, Chairwoman Kelli Ward talks about the Democrat attorneys who are wanting to seal the evidence in our trial and explains why this case looks like it’s heading to the Arizona Supreme Court.”

Kelli Ward states that they were to be allowed a sample of 2500 ballots and then Maricopa County only selected 1,526.

They still found an error rate of .5 percent.

 

 

From Citizen Wells December 3, 2020.

“2,500 BALLOTS TO BE INSPECTED IN SUIT BY ARIZONA GOP CHIEF

County election officials agreed Wednesday to expand their inspection of certain ballots in metro Phoenix that are being challenged in a Republican lawsuit that seeks to reverse Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, who filed a lawsuit contesting the election results, is looking for irregularities among the nearly 28,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were duplicated by elections officials because voters’ earlier ballots were damaged or couldn’t be tabulated. She requested a broader examination of the ballots after a court-ordered inspection of 100 duplicated ballots on Tuesday found two instances in which votes cast for Trump were cancelled in the duplication process.”

“REAL NEWS FROM CITIZEN WELLS NOT PRESENTED BY “FRAUD EXPERT” AP.

2 percent of the sample of 100 was flawed. That alone is disturbing and a game changer.

That is a 3 percent vote swing.

And apparently all you have to do in AZ to dismiss a Trump vote is scribble a write in candidate on the ballot.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/03/arizona-ballot-sample-followup-2500-more-to-be-sampled-after-3-percent-vote-impact-discovered-100-sample-found-trump-affected-3-az-gop-lawsuit/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission et al Dec 2, 2020, “unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials”, Public officials required to follow State Election Law

Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission et al Dec 2, 2020, “unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials”, Public officials required to follow State Election Law

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

From Donald Trump December 2, 2020.

“PRESIDENT TRUMP FILES SUIT IN WISCONSIN ALLEGING UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS

Today President Donald J. Trump filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, et. al. in his personal capacity as a candidate for re-election to the office of President of the United States. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division.

The complaint is based on the unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials, including the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Mayors of Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay, and Racine, and other election officials.

The suit seeks relief under the Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that public officials follow State Election Law when conducting a presidential election in their state. The lawsuits asks the U.S. District Court to find constitutional violations by defendants and send the matter to the Wisconsin Legislature for appropriate relief under Article II, Section 1.2. The U.S. Constitution makes the state legislature the final decision-makers on how to address constitutional violations involving a presidential election, and textually grants them the authority to select delegates to the Electoral College.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges the following key unlawful acts:

  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission undercutting Wisconsin’s Photo Identification Law.
  • A Plan by the Mayors of Wisconsin’s five largest cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay and Racine) and funded by an out-of-state organization known as the Center for Tech & Civic Life to implement a new form of balloting in Wisconsin using un-manned, absentee ballot drop boxes without adequate or uniform chain of custody standards and security protocols contrary to the Wisconsin Election Code.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission that facilitated the unlawful, un-manned absentee ballot drop box Plan by endorsing illegal drop boxes (which were then ultimately used throughout the State in the election), failing to adopt uniform chain of custody and security protocols for the ballots in the drop boxes and failing to ensure public access to the process.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission to election officials to tamper with witness certifications on absentee ballot envelopes which facilitated the counting of unlawful ballots in the election in violation of the Wisconsin Election Code.

“The United States Constitution prevents the rules in a Presidential Election from being changed at the last minute by un-elected bureaucrats and local politicians who may have a more narrow interest in the outcome of the election. We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election. Nothing is more important to our national fabric and future than integrity in our electoral process. This lawsuit is one-step in the direction of fairer, more transparent, more professional and ultimately more reliable elections in America.” Bill Bock, lead counsel in the Wisconsin federal suit for Donald J. Trump.”

Read more:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-statement-on-wisconsin-lawsuit/

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/2020-12-2-article-ii-complaint-wisconsin-final-3.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Georgia Senate oversight committee watch live December 3, 2020, GA history of corruption

Georgia Senate oversight committee watch live December 3, 2020, GA history of corruption

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

Georgia Senate oversight committee watch live:

 

GEORGIA.

From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.

“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An
Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:

14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.

15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.

16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”

“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:

I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”

Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/26/georgia-pennsylvania-absentee-ballot-fraud-exposed-in-lawsuits-hearings-illegal-ballots-revealed-tens-of-thousands-found-watermark-authenticity/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/