Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission et al Dec 2, 2020, “unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials”, Public officials required to follow State Election Law

Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission et al Dec 2, 2020, “unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials”, Public officials required to follow State Election Law

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

From Donald Trump December 2, 2020.

“PRESIDENT TRUMP FILES SUIT IN WISCONSIN ALLEGING UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS

Today President Donald J. Trump filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, et. al. in his personal capacity as a candidate for re-election to the office of President of the United States. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division.

The complaint is based on the unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials, including the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Mayors of Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay, and Racine, and other election officials.

The suit seeks relief under the Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that public officials follow State Election Law when conducting a presidential election in their state. The lawsuits asks the U.S. District Court to find constitutional violations by defendants and send the matter to the Wisconsin Legislature for appropriate relief under Article II, Section 1.2. The U.S. Constitution makes the state legislature the final decision-makers on how to address constitutional violations involving a presidential election, and textually grants them the authority to select delegates to the Electoral College.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges the following key unlawful acts:

  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission undercutting Wisconsin’s Photo Identification Law.
  • A Plan by the Mayors of Wisconsin’s five largest cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay and Racine) and funded by an out-of-state organization known as the Center for Tech & Civic Life to implement a new form of balloting in Wisconsin using un-manned, absentee ballot drop boxes without adequate or uniform chain of custody standards and security protocols contrary to the Wisconsin Election Code.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission that facilitated the unlawful, un-manned absentee ballot drop box Plan by endorsing illegal drop boxes (which were then ultimately used throughout the State in the election), failing to adopt uniform chain of custody and security protocols for the ballots in the drop boxes and failing to ensure public access to the process.
  • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission to election officials to tamper with witness certifications on absentee ballot envelopes which facilitated the counting of unlawful ballots in the election in violation of the Wisconsin Election Code.

“The United States Constitution prevents the rules in a Presidential Election from being changed at the last minute by un-elected bureaucrats and local politicians who may have a more narrow interest in the outcome of the election. We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election. Nothing is more important to our national fabric and future than integrity in our electoral process. This lawsuit is one-step in the direction of fairer, more transparent, more professional and ultimately more reliable elections in America.” Bill Bock, lead counsel in the Wisconsin federal suit for Donald J. Trump.”

Read more:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-statement-on-wisconsin-lawsuit/

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/2020-12-2-article-ii-complaint-wisconsin-final-3.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

13 responses to “Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission et al Dec 2, 2020, “unlawful and unconstitutional acts by Wisconsin public officials”, Public officials required to follow State Election Law

  1. Records reviewed by Just the News show that an executive branch agency called the Wisconsin Election Commission:

    permitted local county election clerks to cure spoiled ballots by filling in missing addresses for witnesses even though state law invalidates any ballot without a witness address.
    exempted as many as 200,000 citizens from voter ID rules by allowing them to claim the COVID-19 pandemic caused them to be “indefinitely confined.”
    failed to purge 130,000 names from outdated voter rolls as required by law.

  2. Video of suitcases of ballots in Ga when counting was supposed to be closed.

    I can just see the FBI right now saying to themselves—— How are we going to talk our way out of this one and explain it away?

    It will probably all just come down in the end to massive amounts of video tapes showing in detail the stealing of the election, and the media, the courts and the gop legislators just saying, ‘tough, biden won’. shut up.’

  3. Nah, i know how they’ll deal with this.

    “We’re going to investigate” . That’s how.

    And six months from now they’ll make an arrest and President Biden will say how glad he is that law enforcement in ensuring that elections can be trusted due to the actions of our heroic FBI.

  4. Giuliani GA hearing almost over.
    INCREDIBLE.
    Game changer!

  5. Philadelphia priest dies after taking Moderna coronavirus vaccine.

    There is literally no chance that the death report will say that the vaccine did it.

  6. fhl…….
    ……….perhaps somebody will blame George Bush for the death of the priest har har…….I remember he was blamed by a lot of IMBECILES for a couple of hurricanes, and the demolition of the twin towers as well.

  7. fhl, here’s the thing with these two vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer: They work with your genes; mRNA (‘messenger’ Ribonucleic Acid) supposedly disrupts an invasive virus and stops it from attaching to the cells in the body. The issue is whether or not these vaccines can alter human genes. Big Pharma will deny this. Of course they will. Their stocks are going through the roof and as always, follow the money.

    Since this is all new, we don’t have any historical data as to what will happen to the human body with the vaccine in 5 days, 10 months, or 20 years. We’re just not there yet.

    I question numbers, anyway. If a driver hits a tree and dies from blunt force trauma (head through the windshield), the coroner doing the autopsy will check for COVID-19 while he’s/she’s at it. If positive, the deceased’s death record shows COVID as the cause; never mind that the guy’s head and the windshield became one. This is why I don’t believe the numbers of positive cases and/or fatalities being published….I’m sure not gonna believe the vaccine numbers when they come out.

    Will I take this vaccine because I’m in a high risk group? Hell no!!!

  8. AND,
    ……in Nevada it sounds as though LEGAL CRIME is now the new norm. This includes POLITICAL CRIME. A few weeks ago the DEMS stated that they would win because they had ALL OF THE POSSIBLE avenues of action against them covered. Such words tell me that ALL of the JUDGES across America are now the PROPERTY of the DEMOCRATS.

  9. SueK…..
    …….question;… What volume of vaccine will it take to surpass the exponential spread of the virus, and similarly WHEN will will we get ahead of the curve? I am inclined to think that the Covid 19 army will still be killing people 10 years from now. It seems perfectly rational to think that until we can vaccinate faster than the disease spreads the rate of spread will not be overcome. What sayou?

  10. AND,
    ……..it is conceivable that this disease could kill as many as half of the world population before mass vaccination begins to show any effect. In addition we could see a secondary danger to humanity resultant of the disease. This is the possibility of mass famine after EVERYTHING STOPS. We can only hope that enough people know how to return to the Earth to provide for themselves and their families. During WW2 a lot of Americans grew a percentage of their own sustenance. People canned, and traded their excesses for other necessities. Wartime rationing of almost everything taught a lot of folks what the words “SELF RELIANCE.”
    mean.

  11. THERE IS
    ………a strong possibility, or maybe even a likelihood that humanity is going to face a catastrophic loss of human life the world over. This could eventually affect all living creatures on Earth. Humanity at present is without any possible way of combatting the unseen army. We would need a hundred pharmaceutical companies all producing a vaccine 24 hrs a day to get ahead of the exponential speed of the spread of the virus. Sadly each time I look out my window(s) I see people outside standing within a couple of feet of each other, and having a unprotected discussion. Nobody seems to even care. !!!!!

  12. Sue,

    There are no numbers on these vaccines indicating whether they do anything at all to stop hospitalizations and deaths. None.
    What they have submitted is that the vaccine will result in fewer cases. But we already know the cases are bogus because they use cycle thresholds that are ludicrous. An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the gov’t must stop forcibly quarantining people based on the bogus pcr test using any ct above 25. They said that is the what the scientific literature identifies as a realistic level of CT. Some scientists go so far as to say a ct of 30 might indicate a case. It is reported that the labs in America are using ct’s between 30 and 40.
    It’s just another con job along with all the other ones they’re playing on us.

    But back to the vaccine. They have given no data on hospitalizations or death rates, just cases. And we don’t know what ct level they are using to define cases. So we dont know if this vaccine stops anyone from dying or not, only that it supposedly results in fewer of these bogus cases. And then there are is the rna risk that you sited and the unknown long term affects.

    I don’t want to take this vaccine and i don’t think i would even want to take it if i was living in a nursing home.
    They lied about the models, they’ve lied about the deaths (johns hopkins study), and they have lied about the cases, they have lied about the hcq.
    And i’m supposed to believe they’re telling the truth about this vaccine that may alter human genes?

  13. Common sense: in the places where there is re-emergence, the masks were mandated and many shut downs were implemented–it didn’t stop a spread, so why bother with these abuses??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s