Trump v Boockvar PA SOS et al US Supreme Court filed December 20, 2020, ” statutory provisions…may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison
From
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.,
v
Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, et al
Filed in the US Supreme Court December 20, 2020.
“Article II of the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint [electors
for President and Vice President] in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may
direct.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). That power is “plenary,” and the statutory provisions enacted by the legislature in the furtherance of that
constitutionally-assigned duty may not be ignored by state election officials or
changed by state courts. Bush v. Gore (“Bush II”), 531 U.S. 98, 104-05 (2000).
Yet, during the 2020 presidential election, that is what the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court did in four cases – three at issue in this Petition, and one already
before the Court. Statutory requirements were eliminated regarding signature
verification, the right of campaigns to challenge invalid mail ballots, mandates that mail voters fill in, date, and sign mail ballot declarations, and even the right of campaigns to observe the mail ballot canvassing process in a meaningful way.
Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania
Legislature. According to public reports, without these protections, the resulting
disqualification rate of invalid ballots was anemic—meaning over 110,000 invalid ballots were illegally counted—more than enough to have affected the outcome of the election, where the margin between the two principal candidates for President currently stands at 80,558. The questions presented are therefore:
Read more:
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-boockvar-petition.pdf
More here:
Citizen WElls 
From the Pennsylvania General Assembly.REGULAR SESSION 2019-2020
HOUSE RESOLUTION 1094
https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/01/pennsylvania-house-resolution-1094-disputing-the-2020-general-election-statewide-contest-results-referred-to-state-government-nov-30-2020/
Just saw Jupiter & Saturn w naked eye & binos.
Almost 60 yrs ago saw moons of both planets. Was very cool.
Had a 90 power refractor telescope.
CW……
……….really neat! Observing natural things does a lot for the soul.
IN ADDITION,
……..seeing some of mother nature’s handiwork sometimes demonstrates just how insignificant we really are.
AND,
……as our society technologically advances why has nobody invented a way to stop volcanos from erupting. One eruption can put more carbon into the world’s atmosphere in 10 minutes, than all of the automobiles on earth can in a year. So mother nature wins again!!!!!
AND NOW,
……….Joe Malarkey says he will bring America’s atmospheric CARBON emissions down to zero by 2023. YEAH SURE JOE. YOU ARE UP AGAINST MOTHER NATURE, AND ROGUE NATIONS. SHE PLAYS HER OWN GAME, AND DAMN FEW HAVE EVER WON PLAYING HER GAME………AND STOPPING CHINA FROM EMITTING CARBON WILL NOT HAPPEN. YOU TELL EM JOE.!!!!
AND,
……..hey Joe, lots of luck to you on stopping all of America’s carbon emissions. Many homes ,and industrial complexes across America are heated by natural gas. The burning of natural gas produces CARBON MONOXIDE, and all of it exits chimneys into the atmosphere. Burning fossil fuel is what the INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE DOES JOE. These engines are operating by the millions 24 hours a day in America. How do you propose to shut down all of this gas by 2023. I would have to say that doing so would be on a par with poking holes in water with your finger.
CW…….
…….BTW did you mean “90 MM” telescope ?
Magnification 90
Wisconsin Supreme court rules 4-3 against Trump’s case that may have won Trump Wisconsin.
It was the chief justice, a Republican, that joined the 3 democrat judges and ruled against Trump. That judge only won his last election because Trump campaigned for him two years ago.
The issue was near 200,000 votes that were cast that did not meet the statutory laws as being valid, but the county clerks made changes to those votes to validate them. They did not have authority to do that according to the law. The three democrats judges and the republican judge said something along the lines of so what, who cares.
Here’s what one dissenting republican judge said:
Republican Justice Patience Roggensack said the “Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective witness addresses were permissible.”
“The majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them,” she added. “The electorate expects more of us, and we are capable of providing it. Because we do not, I respectfully dissent.”
The republican party never has or never will save anybody from anything. Ever.
fhl, see this?
https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/15/trump-lawsuit-dismissed-4-to-3-by-corrupt-wisconsin-supreme-court-justices-dissenters-roggensack-ziegler-bradley-provide-honest-jurisprudence/
I thought i remembered a story about wisconsin and went back through the last few stories and didn’t see it so it must have been earlier.
Now someone says that’s Dominion Energy not Dominion voting systems for Barr.
Doesn’t matter to me. If he says there’s no evidence of voter fraud in the election, he’s still gaslighting us just like democrats.
Pingback: Several election rigging cases are still moving forward to Supreme Court - Merrilee Beazley