Category Archives: US Department of Justice

Fake Russian and DNC leak narratives still impede truth in Seth Rich and Flynn cases, Judge Sullivan, DC Appeals Court, FBI, UK, Ellen Ratner stonewall justice

Posted on September 2, 2020 | 24 comments

Fake Russian and DNC leak narratives still impede truth in Seth Rich and Flynn cases, Judge Sullivan, DC Appeals Court, FBI, UK, Ellen Ratner stonewall justice

“Ellen Ratner can confirm that the Saturday before the Election 2016, she met with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for 3 hours. He told her that Russia did not “hack” the DNC, it was from an internal source.”...Ellen Ratner’s attendance at Embry University symposium on November 9, 2016

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

On Judge Sullivan: “if there was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”...Judge Rao dissenting opinion

 

It is coming to a head.

The truth about the fake Russian Narrative and the leak of DNC data during the 2016 election cycle.

The final pieces of the puzzle are in reach.

The dark forces of the Democrat Deep State are resisting with all their might.

The General Michael Flynn case should have already been dismissed.

We know the truth and are waiting on Durham indictments.

In the recent DC Appeal Court decision in the Flynn motion for Writ of Mandamus, 2 non Clinton Obama justices dissented and revealed the impartiality of Judge Sullivan. This also revealed the efforts of the deep state.

Letters Rogatory have been sent to the UK requesting the testimony of Julian Assange in at least 2 Seth Rich cases.

Ellen Ratner, who met with Julian Assange in 2016 and stated that he said the DNC leaks were an inside job, filed a motion under seal to file document(s) under seal. This was after numerous attempts to serve a subpoena on her.

The dark force Democrat Deep State is desperate to stop these revelations before the 2020 election.

They will do anything.

Their mantra: The end justifies the means.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

24 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Court of Appeals, Courts, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , , , ,

Ellen Ratner Sealed  motion for leave to file document under seal Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al, Ratner attorney Charna Sherman filing August 31, 2020 

Posted on September 1, 2020 | 8 comments

Ellen Ratner Sealed  motion for leave to file document under seal Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al, Ratner attorney Charna Sherman filing August 31, 2020

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

“The FBI clearly has records pertaining to Seth Rich, and it has withheld those
records in bad faith.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger October 11, 2019

“Six unsuccessful attempts to serve Ellen Ratner at addresses in California and New York have been made and Defendants have performed several “skip trace” searches attempting to locate Ms. Ratner.”

“Ms. Ratner remains unserved. Defendants have instructed their process server to continue attempting to locate and serve the correct Ellen Ratner. Quainton Decl. Ex. 13. However, counsel for Defendants respectfully requests that permission be given for alternative means of service, such as through social media, since it appears unlikely service will be successful on Ms. Ratner
by conventional means.”…From Aaron Rich v ED Butowsky, et al  May 11, 2020

 

From Aaron Rich v Ed Butowsky et al August 31, 2020.

“SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by ELLEN F. RATNER (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Motion to Quash, # 2 Affidavit Declaration in Support, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit [PROPOSED] ORDER)(Sherman, Charna) (Entered: 08/31/2020)”

“APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
To: The clerk of court and all parties of record
I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

non party Ellen Ratner

/s/ Charna E. Sherman”

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6346852/rich-v-butowsky/?page=2

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

8 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Flynn en banc Mandamus hearing denial Judge Rao dissent exposes Judge Sullivan’s partiality, “whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”

Posted on September 1, 2020 | 5 comments

Flynn en banc Mandamus hearing denial Judge Rao dissent exposes Judge Sullivan’s partiality, “whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“her client was “totally set up” because he threatened to expose wrongdoing by top intelligence officials in the Obama administration.

“He was going to audit the intel agencies because he knew about the billions Brennan and company were running off the books,” Powell said, referring to former CIA Director John Brennan.”…Sidney Powell, Vickie McKenna Show

On Judge Sullivan: “if there was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone.”...Judge Rao dissenting opinion

 

From the Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rao in the General Michael Flynn hearing for Writ of Mandamus before the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia August 31, 2020.

“The trial judge’s attempted use of Rule 35 is not the first
time he has acted as if he were a party. At his option and with
the appellate court’s approval, Rule 21, as noted earlier, allows
the subject judge to participate in a mandamus proceeding
either directly or by amicus.
5 But Rule 21 leaves no room for
the judge to retain private counsel as was done here. See FED.
R. APP. P. 21(b)(4). A party, not a judge whose action is under
mandamus review, retains private counsel. As the Advisory
Committee Notes on Rule 21(b) make clear, “[b]ecause it is
ordinarily undesirable to place the trial court judge, even
temporarily, in an adversarial posture with a litigant, the rule
permits a court of appeals to invite an amicus curiae to provide
a response to the petition.” FED. R. APP. P. 21(b) advisory
committee’s note to 1996 amendment (first emphasis added).

And his earlier sua sponte appointment of amicus to
oppose the government’s motion to dismiss, although
apparently allowed, is further indication that he has from the
outset appeared to view his role in adjudicating the
government’s motion to dismiss as one that requires outside
support—as if he were a priori antagonistic to the relief both bona fide parties seek.6 Even more telling of apparent
partiality, the trial judge ordered amicus to opine on whether
Flynn had committed perjury and should be held in criminal
contempt. Order Appointing Amicus Curiae at 1, United States
v. Flynn, No. 17-cr-00232 (D.D.C. May 13, 2020), ECF No.
205. That direction indicates that, even if compelled to grant
the motion to dismiss, the trial judge intends to pursue Flynn
on his own.

But it is the trial judge’s conduct since the government’s
May 2020 motion to dismiss, weighed in light of his earlier
conduct, that delivers the coup de grâce to the last shred of the
trial judge’s appearance of impartiality. In other words, if there
was any doubt up to this point whether his conduct gives the
appearance of partiality, that doubt is gone. Granted, the panel
majority opinion resisted Flynn’s request that a different judge
be assigned to this case. See In re Flynn, 961 F.3d at 1223.
That decision rested primarily on the fact that Flynn’s request
centered on the trial judge’s in-court statements, which are
almost always insufficient on their own to warrant
reassignment, and the fact that the trial judge was simply
directed to grant the government’s motion to dismiss. See id.
But the trial judge’s “extreme” conduct throughout this case,
culminating in his decision to ignore the writ and instead seek
en banc review, demonstrates a “clear inability to render fair
judgment.””

““Unbiased, impartial adjudicators are the cornerstone of
any system of justice worthy of the label.” In re Al-Nashiri,
921 F.3d at 233–34. If the trial judge continues to preside over
this case, I submit our system is not so worthy because his
conduct has undermined the appearance of impartiality. My
colleagues in the majority disagree and I am frankly dismayed
by their endorsement of the trial judge’s conduct, especially
after the government’s motion to dismiss. Granted, all
members of the en banc court weigh that conduct in light of
their own experience and notions of impartiality, while, at the
same time, applying § 455(a)’s “objective” standard of “a
reasonable and informed observer.” Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d
at 114. Although, for them, the exact tipping point at which
the appearance of impartiality is lost is unknown, I am certain
that such a point exists and that the trial judge has passed it. To
protect Flynn’s rights as a criminal defendant, the
government’s interest in controlling its prosecution and the
integrity of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,9 I believe the trial judge, by his conduct manifesting
the appearance of glaring partiality, has disqualified himself. I
would order the reassignment of this case to a different trial
judge for dismissal.”

Read more:

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/777940F1C81FD47E852585D5005DADCB/$file/20-5143.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, FBI, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Flynn Writ of Mandamus denied by US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia August 31, 2020, “we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch”

Posted on August 31, 2020 | 4 comments

Flynn Writ of Mandamus denied by US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia August 31, 2020, “we trust and expect the District Court to
proceed with appropriate dispatch”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the FBI’s claims that (1) it did not investigate matters pertaining to Mr. Rich; (2) it did not examine his computer; and (3) it conducted a “reasonable” search but could not locate any records or communications about Mr. Rich. Specifically, Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the affidavit testimony of FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger March 29, 2020

“her client was “totally set up” because he threatened to expose wrongdoing by top intelligence officials in the Obama administration.

“He was going to audit the intel agencies because he knew about the billions Brennan and company were running off the books,” Powell said, referring to former CIA Director John Brennan.”…Sidney Powell, Vickie McKenna Show

 

From the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia August 31, 2020.

“For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied. As the underlying criminal case resumes in the District Court, we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.”

“KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, with whom
RAO, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting: The Court today denies
Michael Flynn’s mandamus petition on the ground that he has
an adequate remedy at law. It also declines to reassign this case
to a different trial judge. I dissent as to the majority’s merits
holding for the reasons stated in the majority opinion in In re
Flynn, 961 F.3d 1215, 1219 (D.C. Cir. 2020), vacated, reh’g
en banc granted No. 20-5143, 2020 WL 4355389 (D.C. Cir.
July 30, 2020); further, I join Judge Rao’s dissent herein. As
to the majority’s decision not to reassign, my colleagues set an
impossibly high bar for a trial judge’s impartiality to
“reasonably be questioned,” 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), and seem
content to read that subsection out of the United States Code,
even as they infuse Rule 48(a)’s “with leave of court” clause
with enough force to upend our entire system of separated
powers. Because I believe the trial judge’s conduct patently
draws his impartiality into question—and because I believe
§ 455(a) has teeth—I dissent and write separately to explain
why the trial judge is disqualified from further participation in
this case.”

“RAO, Circuit Judge, with whom HENDERSON, Circuit
Judge, joins, dissenting: The Department of Justice has moved
to dismiss the criminal charges against General Michael Flynn,
but the district court insists on further factfinding to scrutinize
the motives and circumstances behind the Department’s
decision. While a district court plays a limited role in granting
“leave of court” to an unopposed motion to dismiss, it is long
settled that a district court cannot supervise the prosecutorial
decisions of the Executive Branch. In our system of separated
powers, the government may deprive a person of his liberty
only upon the action of all three branches: Congress must pass
a law criminalizing the activity; the Executive must determine
that prosecution is in the public interest; and the Judiciary,
independent of the political branches, must adjudicate the case.
The Constitution divides these powers in order to protect
individual liberty from a concentration of government
authority.
In Flynn’s case, the prosecution no longer has a prosecutor.
Yet the case continues with district court proceedings aimed at
uncovering the internal deliberations of the Department. The
majority gestures at the potential harms of such a judicial
intrusion into the Executive Branch, but takes a wait-and-see
approach, hoping and hinting that the district judge will not
take the actions he clearly states he will take. While mandamus
remains an extraordinary remedy, it is appropriate here to
prevent this judicial usurpation of the executive power and to
correct the district court’s abuse of discretion. I respectfully
dissent.”

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/777940F1C81FD47E852585D5005DADCB/$file/20-5143.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

4 Comments

Posted in Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Court of Appeals, Courts, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Seth Rich murder and DNC leak involvement, Fox News et al silenced by Obama and Democrat attorneys, 4 prominent lawsuits drag on, Expert witnesses to testify?, Truth emerging?

Posted on August 31, 2020 | 2 comments

Seth Rich murder and DNC leak involvement, Fox News et al silenced by Obama and Democrat attorneys, 4 prominent lawsuits drag on, Expert witnesses to testify?, Truth emerging?

“We can prove, that all the data that Wikileaks published from the DNC, that was downloaded on the 23rd and 25th of May, and also the 26th of August of 2016; all of that carried the signatures of being downloaded to a thumb drive or a CD-ROM, and physically transported,”...William Binney

“we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich.” “Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness”…Jack Burkman

“Ellen Ratner can confirm that the Saturday before the Election 2016, she met with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for 3 hours. He told her that Russia did not “hack” the DNC, it was from an internal source.”...Ellen Ratner’s attendance at Embry University symposium on November 9, 2016

 

Seth Rich was murdered July 10, 2016.

WikiLeaks began publishing 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from top DNC officials on July 22, 2016.

Obama, Joe Biden and top Obama Admin. officials met in the White House in January 2017 to discuss General Michael Flynn.

We now know the only collusion regarding the DNC leaks was between the Obama Admin., Justice Dept. and other government entities.

We still do not know who murdered Seth Rich and who leaked the DNC documents.

There are 4 prominent lawsuits regarding Seth Rich that are still ongoing.

Joel Rich and Mary Rich v Fox News Network, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.490098/gov.uscourts.nysd.490098.1.0.pdf

Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky, et

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6346852/rich-v-butowsky/?page=1

Ed Butowsky v David Folkenflik NPR, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7244731/butowsky-v-folkenflik/

Edward Butowsky v Michael Gottlieb, et al.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14681570/butowsky-v-gottlieb/?page=1

In recent months journalist Ellen Ratner, who met with Julian Assange and announced on video that the DNC leak was done by an insider, had numerous subpoena attempts made on her.

Testimony from Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison in the UK has been requested in multiple cases.

On August 27, 2020 expert witnesses were designated by the defense in Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/08/30/seth-rich-expert-witnesses-filed-by-defendants-butowsky-et-al-william-binney-and-frank-whalen-aaron-rich-v-butowsky-et-al-feces-to-hit-fan/

If you are wondering why you are so uninformed regarding Seth Rich, Julian Assange etc. it is because the largest new organization that would otherwise be covering all of this, Fox News, has effectively been silenced by lawsuits.

So why have so many resources been gathered and employed to silence journalists?

From Gateway Pundit May 25, 2018.

“Obama Admin Attorneys Team with Seth Rich’s Brother – Sue Private Eye Team Investigating Seth Rich

A team of private eyes investigating the death of Seth Rich are facing two major lawsuits prosecuted by high-powered Democratic establishment attorneys for uncovering evidence that insinuates the slain DNC staffer’s murder was politically motivated.

Aaron Rich, the brother of Seth Rich, filed a lawsuit in April in US District Court in the District of Columbia, against America First Media accusing conservative activist Matt Couch and other individuals and media organizations for peddling “false and unfounded claims” about him and acting “with reckless disregard for the truth.”

The lawyer representing Aaron Rich, Michael J. Gottlieb, recently concluded four years of service with the Obama Administration.

He served as Special Assistant to the President and Associate White House Counsel from 2009- 2010, where he focused on national security law and judicial nominations.”

“A second attorney prosecuting Aaron Rich’s case is David Boies, chairman of the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner. Boies has been involved in various high-profile cases in the United States, including United States v. Microsoft Corp., Bush v. Gore and the defense of Harvey Weinstein against sexual abuse allegations.

In an interview with The Gateway Pundit, Matt Couch questioned how Rich, whose family couldn’t afford a private investigator, is able to afford the high powered legal team comprised of Obama’s White House counsel.

“This is who Aaron Rich gets to represent against our team – can you imagine what it would charge to hire Harvey Weinstein’s defense lawyer?  I don’t know how Rich hired these attorneys – the Rich family couldn’t even afford a private investigator, that’s why Ed Butowski offered to pay for Rod Wheeler,” he said. “But now they can afford the most expensive and powerful Democratic law firms in the country – how does that happen?”

The suit is the Democratic establishment’s attempt to stifle independent investigations, Couch argued,  because if the DNC truly wanted justice for Rich they would have offered reward money to find Rich’s killers and would have availed its server to the FBI after the alleged hack.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/obama-admin-attorneys-team-with-seth-richs-brother-sue-private-eye-team-investigating-seth-rich/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

2 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Crime, Defense, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Internet attacks, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , , ,

Seth Rich expert witnesses filed by defendants Butowsky et al, William Binney and Frank Whalen, Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al, Feces to hit fan?

Posted on August 30, 2020 | 6 comments

Seth Rich expert witnesses filed by defendants Butowsky et al, William Binney and Frank Whalen, Aaron Rich v Butowsky et al, Feces to hit fan?

“We can prove, that all the data that Wikileaks published from the DNC, that was downloaded on the 23rd and 25th of May, and also the 26th of August of 2016; all of that carried the signatures of being downloaded to a thumb drive or a CD-ROM, and physically transported,”...William Binney

“we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich.” “Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness”…Jack Burkman

“Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the FBI’s claims that (1) it did not investigate matters pertaining to Mr. Rich; (2) it did not examine his computer; and (3) it conducted a “reasonable” search but could not locate any records or communications about Mr. Rich. Specifically, Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the affidavit testimony of FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger March 29, 2020

 

From Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky et al  August 27, 2020.

“DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED EXPERT DESIGNATIONS

Defendants Edward Butowsky and Matthew Couch designate the following individuals as experts whose testimony is expected to cover the following topics:
1. Larry Johnson – Construction of intelligence narratives/analytical and logical
flaws in the Russian military intelligence DNC hacking narrative.
2. William Binney – Forensic analysis of DNC Wikileaks email metadata and
disproof of Russian remote hacking theory.
3. Frank Whalen – Law enforcement homicide procedures and investigative
obstruction.
4. Yakov Apelbaum – Digital evidence analysis of electronic communication use
and manipulation; root cause analysis of DNC hack.
5. John Moynihan – Forensic analysis of financial disclosures/adequacy of
disclosure for purposes of determining source/receipt of funds.
6. Richard Fisher, Fisher & Associates – Analysis and evaluation of
communications related to alleged defamation, conclusions and opinions as to defamation liability and potential impact.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794.236.3.pdf

From Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) March 13, 2019.

“Recent forensic examination of the Wikileaks DNC files shows they were created on 23, 25 and 26 May 2016. (On June 12, Julian Assange announced he had them; WikiLeaks published them on July 22.) We recently discovered that the files reveal a FAT (File Allocation Table) system property. This shows that the data had been transferred to an external storage device, such as a thumb drive, before WikiLeaks posted them.

FAT is a simple file system named for its method of organization, the File Allocation Table. It is used for storage only and is not related to internet transfers like hacking. Were WikiLeaks to have received the DNC files via a hack, the last modified times on the files would be a random mixture of odd-and even-ending numbers.

Why is that important? The evidence lies in the “last modified” time stamps on the Wikileaks files. When a file is stored under the FAT file system the software rounds the time to the nearest even-numbered second. Every single one of the time stamps in the DNC files on WikiLeaks’ site ends in an even number.

We have examined 500 DNC email files stored on the Wikileaks site. All 500 files end in an even number—2, 4, 6, 8 or 0. If those files had been hacked over the Internet, there would be an equal probability of the time stamp ending in an odd number. The random probability that FAT was not used is 1 chance in 2 to the 500th power. Thus, these data show that the DNC emails posted by WikiLeaks went through a storage device, like a thumb drive, and were physically moved before Wikileaks posted the emails on the World Wide Web.

This finding alone is enough to raise reasonable doubts, for example, about Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers for hacking the DNC emails given to WikiLeaks. A defense attorney could easily use the forensics to argue that someone copied the DNC files to a storage device like a USB thumb drive and got them physically to WikiLeaks — not electronically via a hack.”

“For the steering group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity:

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center (ret.)”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2019/04/23/ny-times-mueller-lies-exposed-by-intelligence-professionals-if-not-seth-rich-then-who-dnc-files-transferred-to-thumb-drive-not-hacked-vips/

Frank Whalen:

Experience

  • Monday Properties

    Investigator Pre Employment Screening

    Monday Properties

    2006 – 202014 years

  • Metro Investigative Services

    Owner

    Metro Investigative Services

    Apr 2004 – 2020 16 years

  • NYPD

    Detective Sergeant (Ret.)

    NYPD

    1982 – 2004 22 years

    CO Brooklyn South Homicide Task Force

From Gateway Pundit July 9, 2018.

““We believe that we have reached the beginning of the end of the Seth Rich murder investigation,” Burkman told The Gateway Pundit in an exclusive interview Sunday.  “After two long hard years of work, we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich. One is reportedly a current DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent, the other is reportedly a current ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) agent”

The witness, who “fears for his life,” will be accompanied by armed guards and disguise his identity as he details how two employees of the United States government killed Seth in a press conference slated for Tuesday.

Frank Whalen, a retired NYPD Detective Sergeant NYPD who served as the head of NYPD Homicide for 23 years, found the witness, Burkman explained.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/

Messenger shooters and swamp dwellers beware. These witnesses will testify under oath.

Looks like the feces is going to hit the fan.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Crime, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Fox news, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Julian Assange testimony Letters Rogatory issued August 27, 2020 in Rich v Fox Network,  To be served on Julian Assange in the United Kingdom

Posted on August 28, 2020 | 4 comments

Julian Assange testimony Letters Rogatory issued August 27, 2020 in Rich v Fox Network,  To be served on Julian Assange in the United Kingdom

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

“Re: Seth Rich, keep an eye on the National Security Division of the Justice Department. As you can see from the federal complaint, the NSD ignored a FOIA request that I filed back in 2018 for records about Seth Rich. And look at Paragraph 16, plus Exhibit 8. I think NSD is playing a bigger role in the “Russian hacking” narrative than most of us understood. By sending Seth Rich records there, it’s easier to keep things classified. So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

“Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al  August 24, 2020”…Citizen Wells

 

From Rich v Fox News Network August 27, 2020.

“LETTERS ROGATORY ISSUED on August 27, 2020, to Williams & Connolly LLP, to be served on Julian Assange, in the United Kingdom, to appear for testimony. Letters mailed to Joseph M. Terry at 725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.(km)”

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6333385/rich-v-fox-news-network-llc/?page=2

From Citizen Wells August 5, 2020.

“This Request is being made to obtain testimony from Julian Assange for use at trial in the above-captioned matter in relation to the source of the DNC emails and documents released by WikiLeaks in 2016; WikiLeaks’ response to Mr. Rich’s murder; and WikiLeaks’ communications with Mr. Rich and members of Mr. Rich’s family.”

“Fox News seeks testimony in response to the following specific questions:
1) What was Mr. Assange’s role (if any) in the establishment of WikiLeaks?
2) What was Mr. Assange’s role (if any) in connection with the activities of WikiLeaks in 2016?
3) In 2016 and 2017, what role (if any) did Mr. Assange have regarding the content of WikiLeaks’ Twitter postings?
4) What was Mr. Assange’s involvement (if any) in WikiLeaks’ July 22, 2016 release of emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), as referenced at https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?
5) When were those emails and documents provided to WikiLeaks?
6) How did WikiLeaks obtain the DNC emails and documents?
7) Which individual(s) and/or entit(y/ies) provided the DNC emails and documents to WikiLeaks?
8) Which individual(s) and/or entit(y/ies) obtained those materials from the DNC?
9) Describe any role played by Seth Rich to your knowledge in obtaining those materials and/or providing them to WikiLeaks.
10) To your knowledge, has WikiLeaks ever offered a reward for information related to a murder that occurred in the United States other than in relation to the murder of Seth Rich? If so, on how many occasions?
11) Why did WikiLeaks provide a reward for information related to the murder of Seth Rich?
12) Has Mr. Assange ever communicated with Seth Rich in any manner?
13) If so, what was the content of the communications?
14) If Mr. Assange himself has not communicated with Seth Rich, is Mr. Assange aware as to whether any person affiliated with WikiLeaks ever communicated with Seth Rich in any manner?
15) If so, (a) who communicated with Seth Rich? And (b) what, to Mr. Assange’s knowledge, was the content of such communication(s)?
16) Has Mr. Assange ever communicated in any manner with another member of the Rich family, including (but not limited to) Aaron Rich, Joel Rich, or Mary Rich?                                                                                                                                     17) If so, what was the content of those communications?
18) To Mr. Assange’s knowledge, has any other person affiliated with WikiLeaks ever communicated in any manner with a member of the Rich family?
19) If so, (a) who communicated with the Rich family? And (b) what, to Mr. Assange’s knowledge, was the content of such communication(s)?
20) To Mr. Assange’s knowledge, did any individual(s) and/or entit(y/ies) affiliated with the Russian Federation (including, but not limited to, the FSB, SVR, GU (or GRU), FSPSI, or any other intelligence service) play any role in obtaining and/or providing to WikiLeaks the 2016 DNC emails released by WikiLeaks?”

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2020/08/05/julian-assange-testimony-requested-in-rich-v-fox-news-august-5-2020-seth-rich-involvement-in-dnc-email-and-document-leak-uk-court-per-hague-convention/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

4 Comments

Posted in Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Courts, Democrats, DNC, Election 2016, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , ,

Assange in a lot of pain and thinner, Julian Assange partner and children visit in Belmarsh Prison August 24, 2020, Assange knows truth about DNC leak and Seth Rich involvement

Posted on August 26, 2020 | 15 comments

Assange in a lot of pain and thinner, Julian Assange partner and children visit in Belmarsh Prison August 24, 2020, Assange knows truth about DNC leak and Seth Rich involvement

“Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

“Re: Seth Rich, keep an eye on the National Security Division of the Justice Department. As you can see from the federal complaint, the NSD ignored a FOIA request that I filed back in 2018 for records about Seth Rich. And look at Paragraph 16, plus Exhibit 8. I think NSD is playing a bigger role in the “Russian hacking” narrative than most of us understood. By sending Seth Rich records there, it’s easier to keep things classified. So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

“Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al  August 24, 2020”…Citizen Wells

 

From The Daily Mail.

“Julian Assange’s partner says he is in ‘a lot of pain’ and ‘a lot thinner’ after she visited him in Belmarsh prison with their two children for the first time in six months
  • Stella Moris took Gabriel, three, and Max, one, to visit their father in the prison 
  • She said he was ‘in a lot of pain’ and thinner than when she last saw him in March 
  • Family wore face masks and visors in 20-minute meeting and could not touch

Julian Assange’s partner has said he is in ‘a lot of pain’ after she visited him in Belmarsh Prison for the first time in almost six months.

Stella Moris took the couple’s two children Gabriel, three, and Max, one, to meet their ‘much thinner’ father at the south-east London prison today.

The WikiLeaks founder, 49, is awaiting an extradition hearing on behalf of the US government, which is due to start at the Old Bailey on September 7. “

“The US stepped up its case at the ’11th hour’ earlier this month after submitting further allegations against the 49-year-old which would see him spending even longer behind bars.

Florence Iveson, representing Assange, said the 33-page submission was ‘astonishing’ and ‘potentially abusive’, claiming the US was ‘seeking to add a considerable amount of conduct and seeking to extend the case significantly’.

Ms Moris has launched a crowdfunding appeal to try to raise £600,000 towards the cost of fighting extradition, with Assange’s legal costs already surpassing £500,000.”

Read more:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8662979/Julian-Assanges-partner-says-lot-pain.html

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

15 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Courts, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al  August 24, 2020, Seth Rich Wikileaks source of DNC files?, Requests international judicial assistance

Posted on August 24, 2020 | Leave a comment

Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al  August 24, 2020, Seth Rich Wikileaks source of DNC files?, Requests international judicial assistance

“Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the FBI’s claims that (1) it did not investigate matters pertaining to Mr. Rich; (2) it did not examine his computer; and (3) it conducted a “reasonable” search but could not locate any records or communications about Mr. Rich. Specifically, Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the affidavit testimony of FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger March 29, 2020

“I repeatedly asked U.S. Attorney John Durham and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate whether Mr. Hardy lied under oath, and in an April 22, 2020 letter Mr. Horowitz wrote that he referred my complaint to the FBI’s Inspection Division. Was Mr. Hardy forced out?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

“Re: Seth Rich, keep an eye on the National Security Division of the Justice Department. As you can see from the federal complaint, the NSD ignored a FOIA request that I filed back in 2018 for records about Seth Rich. And look at Paragraph 16, plus Exhibit 8. I think NSD is playing a bigger role in the “Russian hacking” narrative than most of us understood. By sending Seth Rich records there, it’s easier to keep things classified. So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020

 

From Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky, et al August 24, 2020.

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
LETTER OF REQUEST PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18 MARCH
1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL
MATTERS (THE “HAGUE CONVENTION”)

“The United States District Court for the District of Columbia presents its compliments to the appropriate judicial authority of the United Kingdom (“UK”), and requests international judicial assistance to obtain evidence to be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the above-captioned matter. Upon hearing the Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of a Letter of Requestter “Governski Decl.”), this Court has determined that it would further the interests of justice if by the proper and usual process of your Court, you summon Julian Assange to appear before a person empowered under English law to administer oaths and take testimony forthwith, to give testimony under oath or affirmation by
questions and answers upon oral examination in respect of the matters and issues identified below, and permit the parties to create a written transcript and video recording of such testimony.

The applicant for thisletter is Aaron Rich. UK counsel is available to answer any questions the Court may have.”

“The testimony is intended for use at trial, and in the view of this Court, will be relevant to claims and defenses in the case, including Plaintiff Aaron Rich’s allegations of defamation.”

“Defendants have seized upon statements that WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, made on a Dutch television program approximately one month after Seth Rich’s murder. In that interview, Mr. Assange made comments that Defendants have interpreted as an insinuation (or more) that Seth Rich may have been a WikiLeaks source. Although WikiLeaks subsequently
released a statement on Twitter that its policy of neither confirming nor denying “whether any person has ever been a source for WikiLeaks” should “not be taken to imply that Seth Rich was a source to WikiLeaks or to imply that his murder is connected to our publications,” WikiLeaks nonetheless continued to publish tweets about Seth Rich that provided fodder for Defendants’
conspiracy theories. Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded that Assange’s and WikiLeaks’ “statements about Rich implied falsely that he had been the source of the stolen DNC emails,” noting that “information uncovered during the investigation discredit WikiLeaks’ claims about the source of material that it posted.””

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794.230.0.pdf

 

10 RESPONSES TO “JULIAN ASSANGE TESTIMONY REQUESTED IN RICH V FOX NEWS AUGUST 5, 2020, SETH RICH INVOLVEMENT IN DNC EMAIL AND DOCUMENT LEAK, UK COURT PER HAGUE CONVENTION”

  1. CitizenWElls | August 5, 2020 at 6:11 pm | | Edit

    “Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr

  2. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 6:28 pm | | Edit

    CW…….
    ………one thing seems to be certain where Julian Assange is concerned…….if he is brought out of the prison for ANY reason he will immediately have a target attached to him………and I would bet that he would be DEAD in less than 24 hours. It is my belief that Podesta already has a contract out on Assange, and I would also bet that it has a value in 6 figures. This is how the DEMOCRATIC BASTARDS do business.

  3. CitizenWElls | August 5, 2020 at 6:38 pm | | Edit

    Ty Clevenger:

    “So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”

    Speaks volumes

  4. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 6:38 pm | | Edit

    CW…….
    ……….in truth the DEMOCRATS are a Mafia type of organization. For a very long time the New York Mafia families were tied to the DEMOCRATIC party. This goes back into the years prior to WW2. In those days the New York political organization was referred to as TAMMANY HALL. All of the organized crime groups had ties with Tammany Hall. That is how they survived!!!!!!

  5. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 6:53 pm | | Edit

    AND…….
    ………….you can be sure that the TERRAPIN, and his siblings are products of the old Tammany Hall MURDER INCORPORATED. REAL BASTARDS.

  6. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 7:04 pm | | Edit

    YES……..
    ……….it SPEAKS VOLUMES !!! Assange’s life is not worth a plugged nickel if he is brought anywhere near the public. He is comparatively safe as long as he is kept in the bowels of the high security prison. IN TRUTH he really isn’t even safe there……..perhaps just a little safer.!!!! Sooner or later he will be DISPOSED of. The stinking CRIMINAL SLIME in the world can even ooze through tiny cracks in the prison concrete.

  7. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 7:18 pm | | Edit

    SETH RICH………
    ………..was murdered as a reprisal for his misadventure of hacking the DNC computers. Somehow the TERRAPIN and his sneaking associates quickly figured out who was responsible for the massive theft of classified DNC files. He allegedly publicly stated that he had NO PROBLEM with teaching Rich a lesson. When the TERRAPIN said those words it became the command to WHACK Rich. The TERRAPIN along with his STINKING CRIMINAL FRIENDS WILL ALL eventually PAY THE FIDDLER. REAL BASTARDS. Even Whitey Bulger did not do some of the sort of crimes the TERRAPIN is capable of committing. The TERRAPIN is a TRUE PIECE OF SH-T.

  8. oldsailor88 | August 5, 2020 at 7:26 pm | | Edit

    AND…….
    ……….Betty BOOP lost the election, because she came to be seen as the same sort of CRAP as the New York Mafia slimes.

  9. Pingback: Ellen Ratner subpoena saga, Rich v Butowsky et al  August 4, 2020, Seth Rich Assange witness, Motion for time to effect service, Why are Assange & Ratner kept away? | Citizen WElls Edit
  10. Pingback: Seth Rich coverup Part 1, Fox News attacked and silenced, Appeals judge quotes lie, How we got to Assange Ratner testimony request, Attorney Clevenger: “why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?” | Citizen WElls Edit

LEAVE A REPLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Courts, Election 2016, FBI, Murder, Seth Rich, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,

Kevin Clinesmith plea deal better topple bigger scumbags, Clinesmith guilty of crimes against US, “impacted the reputation of the FBI”, Horowitz June 2018 report

Posted on August 14, 2020 | 17 comments

Kevin Clinesmith plea deal better topple bigger scumbags, Clinesmith guilty of crimes against US, “impacted the reputation of the FBI”, Horowitz June 2018 report

“Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr

Ҥ2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States….”…US Code

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”…Ephesians 6:12

 

The assumed plea deal struck between High Criminal Kevin Clinesmith and the US Justice Dept. had better be a productive one. Hopefully bigger scumbags than he will be indicted as a result.

Kevin Clinesmith has been revealed as Attorney 2 in the June 2018 Horowitz Office of the Inspector Report.

As we describe in Chapter Twelve, during our review we
identified text messages and instant messages sent on
FBI mobile devices or computer systems by five FBI
employees who were assigned to the Midyear
investigation. These included:

• Text messages exchanged between Strzok and
Page;
• Instant messages exchanged between Agent 1,
who was one of the four Midyear case agents,
and Agent 5, who was a member of the filter
team; and
• Instant messages sent by FBI Attorney 2, who
was assigned to the Midyear investigation.

The text messages and instant messages sent by these
employees included statements of hostility toward then
candidate Trump and statements of support for
candidate Clinton, and several appeared to mix political
opinions with discussions about the Midyear
investigation.

We found that the conduct of these five FBI employees
brought discredit to themselves, sowed doubt about the
FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation, and
impacted the reputation of the FBI. Although our
review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence
directly connecting the political views these employees
expressed in their text messages and instant messages
to the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in
Chapter Five, the conduct by these employees cast a
cloud over the FBI Midyear investigation and sowed
doubt the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the
Midyear investigation. Moreover, the damage caused
by their actions extends far beyond the scope of the
Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s
reputation for neutral factfinding and political
independence.”

“Finally, we identified instant messages sent on FBINet by FBI Attorney 2.
FBI Attorney 2 was assigned to the Midyear investigation, the Russia investigation,
and the Special Counsel investigation. We found instant messages in which FBI
Attorney 2 discussed political issues, including three instant message exchanges
that raised concerns of potential bias.”

“FBI Attorney 2 was assigned to the Midyear investigation early in 2016. FBI
Attorney 2 was not the lead FBI attorney assigned to Midyear and he told us he
provided support to the investigation as needed. FBI Attorney 2 told us that he was also assigned to the investigation into Russian election interference and was the primary FBI attorney assigned to that investigation beginning in early 2017. FBI Attorney 2 told us that he was then assigned to the Special Counsel investigation once it began. FBI Attorney 2 left the Special Counsel’s investigation and returned to the FBI in late February 2018, shortly after the OIG provided the Special Counsel with some of the instant messages discussed in this section.”

“The second exchange we identified occurred on November 9, 2016, the day
after the presidential election. FBI Attorney 2 and another FBI employee who was not involved in the Midyear investigation exchanged the following instant messages.
Note that the sender of the instant message is identified after the timestamp and
intervening messages that did not contribute to the understanding of this exchange are not included.
09:38:14, FBI Attorney 2: “I am numb.”
09:55:35, FBI Employee: “I can’t stop crying.”
10:00:13, FBI Attorney 2: “That makes me even more sad.”
10:43:20, FBI Employee: “Like, what happened?”
10:43:37, FBI Employee: “You promised me this wouldn’t happen.
YOU PROMISED.”
10:43:43, FBI Employee: Okay, that might have been a lie…”
10:43:46, FBI Employee: “I’m very upset.”
10:43:47, FBI Employee: “haha”
10:51:48, FBI Attorney 2: “I am so stressed about what I could have
done differently.”
10:54:29, FBI Employee: “Don’t stress. None of that mattered.”
10:54:31, FBI Employee: “The FBI’s influence.”
10:59:36, FBI Attorney 2: “I don’t know. We broke the momentum.”
11:00:03, FBI Employee: “That is not so.”
11:02:22, FBI Employee: “All the people who were initially voting for
her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out.
Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS
that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They
probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on his policies,
and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.

11:11:43, FBI Attorney 2: “I’m just devastated. I can’t wait until I
can leave today and just shut off the world for the next four days.”
11:12:06, FBI Employee: “Why are you devastated?”
11:12:18, FBI Employee: “Yes, I’m not watching tv for four years.”
11:14:16, FBI Attorney 2: “I just can’t imagine the systematic
disassembly of the progress we made over the last 8 years. ACA is
gone. Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and
crap is true. I honestly feel like there is going to be a lot more gun
issues, too, the crazies won finally. This is the tea party on steroids.
And the GOP is going to be lost, they have to deal with an incumbent
in 4 years. We have to fight this again. Also Pence is stupid.”
11:14:58, FBI Employee: “Yes that’s all true.”
11:15:01, FBI Attorney 2: “And it’s just hard not to feel like the FBI
caused some of this. It was razor thin in some states.”
11:15:09, FBI Employee: “Yes it was very thin.”
11:15:23, FBI Attorney 2: “Plus, my god damned name is all over the
legal documents investigating his staff.”
11:15:24, FBI Employee: “But no I absolutely do not believe the FBI
had any part.”
11:15:33, FBI Attorney 2: “So, who knows if that breaks to him what
he is going to do.””

Read more if you can stomach it:

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, corruption, Crime, Criminal Complaint, Election 2016, Evil, FBI, Government, US Department of Justice

Tagged , , ,