Category Archives: Hillary Clinton

Danney Williams Clintons son?, Bill Clinton father of “Danny”?, Mother Arkansas prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, Citizen Wells reveals NewsMax Stephanopoulos threat articles, Hillary Clintons Banish Williams? More lies to be exposed

Posted on October 5, 2016 | 32 comments

Danney Williams Clintons son?, Bill Clinton father of “Danny”?, Mother Arkansas prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, Citizen Wells reveals NewsMax Stephanopoulos threat articles, Hillary Clintons Banish Williams? More lies to be exposed

“Stephanopoulos warned on national television that there is an “Ellen Rometsch strategy” by “White House allies” to “bring down” perceived adversaries of the Clinton Administration – which includes everyone from reporters to investigators to members of Congress. Stephanopoulos confirmed to Judicial Watch, under oath, the existence of this “deterrent strategy.””…Judicial Watch August 20, 1998

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

As I stated earlier, I firmly believe that the scrubbed and rejuvenated articles presented at Citizen Wells are just as important as the leaks presented by Wikileaks.

I also believe that the Danney (Danny) Williams story, the allegation that he is the illigitimate son of Bill Clinton, is important.

It reveals how the Clintons and their handlers treat people and the depth and scope of Bill Clinton’s debauchery.

From the Political Insider.

“Matt Drudge Drops BOMBSHELL – Clinton’s ‘Love Child’ Confirmed! BREAKING NEWS”

“This story first started to be investigated in 1992. While a paternity test supposedly disproved the claim, top Trump adviser Roger Stone announced that the paternity test doesn’t exist!

Interestingly, the story of the paternity test was first broken by the Drudge Report in 1999. That is leading top political insiders to wonder just what Matt Drudge knows about this bombshell news, which could have devastating consequences to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Bill Clinton reportedly had an affair with a prostitute in Little Rock, Arkansas. Her name is Bobbie Ann Williams, and she – along with her family – have passed multiple lie-dictator tests when asked if Clinton is the father of her illegitimate son Danny.

Buddy Young, a former Arkansas State Trooper, has admitted that in 1983, he drove Clinton and Bobbie to her mother’s home near Hot Springs for an extended, intimate visit while the mother was out-of-town. Both were paid $400 each, plus a $50 tip.

What makes the story so compelling is, Danny also looks like Bill!”

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/clinton-son-matt-drudge-drops-bombshell-love-child-confirmed/

Hillary Clinton Had Bill’s Mixed Race Son Banished

From The Daily Beast May 21, 2016.

“My Quest to Find Bill Clinton’s Love Child”

“Mostly, the mainstream media has ignored the maybe-story of Danney Williams—if we’re going by those papers, after all, Hillary’s adopted alien baby should be graduating from college.

But I wondered what would happen if I tried to report it out. Is the problem, as Clinton critics allege, that reporters don’t pay attention to stories like that of Danney Williams? Or is the problem people like Danney Williams?

The story, laid out in great detail in the anti-Clinton opus The Clintons’ War on Women, goes like this: Clinton, then the governor of Arkansas, was out for a jog one day in 1984 in Little Rock when he met Bobbie Ann Williams (sometimes spelled Bobbi or Bobby), a 24-year-old prostitute, at a housing project. A few days later, Clinton jogged by again, but this time he solicited Williams for sex behind some bushes for $200.

Over the course of several months, they engaged in similar behavior more than a dozen times—mostly alone but also with additional female partners—often at Clinton’s mom’s house out in the country or at a downtown Little Rock Holiday Inn, where Clinton rented rooms under the name William Clay.

Eventually, Williams became pregnant. Her suspicion that Clinton was the father was confirmed when the baby was born on Dec. 7, 1985, white as could be. He had been the only white man she’d slept with the month the baby was conceived. She named her son Danney Lee Williams Jr., as a way to, perhaps perversely, honor her husband.”

On Feb. 18, 1992, the tale went from hometown rumor to saucy national story when it was published by The Globe, the weekly tabloid. “When I told him that he was the father of my baby, he just laughed,” Williams told The Globe, according to The Clintons’ War On Women. “He rubbed my big belly and said, ‘Girl, that can’t be my baby.’ But I knew it was. I just had this kind of woman’s feeling that this was his child.”

The Globe claimed Williams and Bolton had taken lie detector tests and both had passed, a common tabloid refrain. But despite the cinematic appeal, the story quickly faded away. It’d be six years before it cropped back up again in the news, thanks to the Internet.”

“In 1998, Bolton—the woman who raised Clinton’s alleged love child—started talking to Newsmax, the conservative website founded that year by Christopher Ruddy, a former New York Post reporter. Newsmax reported that George Stephanopoulos, the Clintons’ one-time communications director, had used threatening tactics to kill the story. When I asked Stephanopoulos about this in 2016, he referred me to a spokesperson for ABC, who asked me to provide the text of the Newsmax report. Neither Stephanopoulos or his spokesperson ever responded.

Bolton claimed to have talked to Hillary herself and she said she wanted Clinton to take a DNA test. In January 1999, the Drudge Report ran with the news that Star magazine, another tabloid, claimed it’d conducted one, using the analysis of Clinton’s DNA published by Kenneth Starr in the impeachment report and samples they’d taken from Danney, by then 13, and Bobbie.”

“Much of these flames have been stoked, naturally, by the authors of The Clintons’ War on Women, Roger Stone—a longtime Trump adviser—and Robert Morrow, a full-time conspiracy theorist.

In February, I sat down in Des Moines with Morrow, who admitted he had never met Danney, to talk about the story. “They made it up!” he said of Star magazine’s DNA test. “It’s Clinton-disinfo. It’s a planted story—a fake planted story. There was no DNA test. Prove it! Where? Danney don’t know about it. Star magazine didn’t know about. Stone talks to the current people who own those magazines [and] they say, ‘what are you talking about?’””

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/21/my-quest-to-find-bill-clinton-s-love-child.html

Here are NewsMax articles about George Stephanopoulos using threats to shut down people and stories. They have been resurrected.

From NewsMax Newsmax December 28, 1998 via Citizen News.

“Stephanopoulos Used Threat to Stifle Clinton Son Story”

“”I guarantee you that if you do this you’ll never work in Democratic politics again.”

That was the threat issued by George Stephanopoulos to Steve Dinari, director of Ross Perot’s Illinois campaign, when Dinari informed him that he was ready to go public with a credible allegation that Bill Clinton had fathered an illegitimate son.

It was the day before the 1992 election. Stephanopoulos was in Clinton’s Little Rock campaign headquarters nervously anticipating the next day’s returns when a secretary told him that Dinari was on the phone and “he wants to talk to someone confidentially.”

Stephanopoulos’ side of their conversation was captured on videotape by a film crew preparing a documentary on the 1992 Clinton-Gore campaign, which was released the next year under the title “The War Room.”

Dinari informed Stephanopoulos, then campaign communications director, that he had names, addresses, and phone numbers of people who could back the story up. In a tense moment of election-eve panic, the Clinton wunderkind barked into the phone:

“It’s completely bullshit! If you went on the radio and said that Bill Clinton is the father of an illegitimate black child, you will be laughed at. People will think you’re crazy. … You will be embarrassed before the national press corps. People will think, nobody will believe you, and people will think you’re scum.”

Then Stephanopoulos changed tack, pointing out to Dinari that his cooperation on the Danny Williams bombshell would not go unnoticed: “If you don’t do it, it will cause you some temporary pain with people who tomorrow aren’t going to matter. And you have a campaign that understands that in a difficult time you did something right.”

With a video camera rolling just a few feet away, Stephanopoulos was quick to qualify his hint of possible favors for Dinari’s silence, adding: “I mean, it doesn’t mean anything. We can’t do anything for you specifically or anything like that.”

Nine months earlier, Globe magazine carried a report on Little Rock prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, who alleged that during one of 13 sexual encounters with then-Gov. Clinton in 1984, she conceived her son, Danny. Photos as well as eyewitness accounts attest to Danny’s resemblance to Clinton.

Both Bobbie Ann and a corroborating witness, her sister Lucille Bolton, submitted to lie-detector tests to bolster their accounts. Both passed.

Dinari was told by Stephanopoulos that the story had already been investigated and rejected by “every major national news organization,” which, according to several sources close to the Danny Williams story, is altogether untrue.

In interviews with NewsMax.com this fall, Bolton, who acts as family spokesperson, said that only Globe magazine had looked into the story in 1992 and that in the intervening six years NewsMax.com was “the only one I’ve talked to.”

Robert “Say” McIntosh, the Little Rock community activist responsible for publicizing the story locally, told NewsMax.com that the Arkansas Democrat Gazette as well as other news organizations he contacted refused to cover the explosive allegations.

Bolton told NewsMax.com that Danny now “wants the truth to come out” and that his current guardian, Shirley Howard, would like to see the president submit to a paternity test.

Stephanopoulos would use the same tactics four years later, when similarly damaging charges surfaced in a book by an FBI agent who had just retired from his post at the Clinton White House. Gary Aldrich’s “Unlimited Access” featured allegations of illicit presidential sex and an insider’s view of an unprecedented breakdown in White House security.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/10/05/stephanopoulos-used-threat-to-stifle-clinton-son-story-danny-williams-clinton-son-i-guarantee-you-that-if-you-do-this-youll-never-work-in-democratic-politics-again-allegation-that-bill-clin/

From Judicial Watch August 20, 1998 via Citizen News.

“Judicial Watch finds pattern of lying by Clinton allies

Stephanopoulos sanctioned, Carville rebuked by court

Judicial Watch Seeks Court Order to Re-Question Stephanopoulos About White House Ally Smear Campaign

Both George Stephanopoulos and James Carville were recently found by a court to have been less than forthright in the Judicial Watch Filegate civil suit. Stephanopoulos, a former advisor to President Clinton, was sanctioned by the court for making unbelievable statements under oath. Specifically, the court found that Stephanopoulos’ “claims of memory loss are simply not believable” and some of his sworn testimony was “not truthful.” As a result, Stephanopoulos was sanctioned by the court and will be forced to pay thousands of dollars in attorney’s costs and fees to Judicial Watch. (Will ABC follow The Boston Globe’s and The New Republic’s lead?)

Another Clinton ally, James Carville, was also admonished by the court for “piecemeal disclosure” of his availability for a court-ordered deposition. The court also found “impropriety” in Carville’s activities and rebuked Carville and his attorney for “active[ly] misleading” the court.

Stephanopoulos warned on national television that there is an “Ellen Rometsch strategy” by “White House allies” to “bring down” perceived adversaries of the Clinton Administration – which includes everyone from reporters to investigators to members of Congress. Stephanopoulos confirmed to Judicial Watch, under oath, the existence of this “deterrent strategy.” Historically, the “Ellen Rometsch strategy” refers to the misuse of FBI files to blackmail members of Congress to prevent an investigation into President John Kennedy’s alleged affair with East German spy Ellen Rometsch. In light of the fact that the Clinton Internet front, Salon Magazine, also confirmed the existence of this “scorched-earth plan” last week, Judicial Watch is seeking a court order to force Stephanopoulos to tell Judicial Watch who the “White House allies” are.

“Stephanopoulos and Salon put out the word about a blackmail operation to protect President Clinton from the consequences of his sordid activities,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman. “Unless we quickly find out who the ‘White House allies’ are, more innocent people could be hurt.””

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/13/judicial-watch-finds-pattern-of-lying-by-clinton-allies-stephanopoulos-sanctioned-carville-rebuked-by-court-stephanopoulos-warned-on-national-tv-of-ellen-rometsch-strategy-by-white-house-alli/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

32 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton, Sex, white house

Tagged , , , ,

Hillary Wicked Leaks reveal mob type threats, Kathleen Willey Juanita Broaddrick threatened, David Schippers: type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob), James Carville: like working for organized crime being in the Mafia

Posted on October 4, 2016 | 15 comments

Hillary Wicked Leaks reveal mob type threats, Kathleen Willey Juanita Broaddrick threatened, David Schippers: type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob), James Carville: like working for organized crime being in the Mafia

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.”…”The Clintons’ War on Women”

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

Julian Assange of Wikileaks has been threatened by Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Camp.

He has every reason to be concerned.

The Clintons have been involved in mob style intimidation and worse for decades.

The following 2 men, David Schippers and James Carville, Democrats at the time, really knew the Clintons.

From NewsMax September 6, 2000 via Citizen News.

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.

“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””

http://citizenwells.net/2016/08/17/schippers-i-wanted-broaddrick-to-testify-they-were-all-over-that-woman-and-it-was-the-type-of-stuff-we-ran-into-with-the-outfit-the-chicago-mob-intimidation-just-by-watching-her-making-the/

From NewsMax March 27, 2001 via Citizen News.

“Carville: Defending Clinton Like Being in Mob

Speaking to a gathering in Monterey, Calif., Monday night, Democratic Party spinmeister James Carville likened his years of battling on behalf of Bill Clinton to working for organized crime.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/10/04/carville-defending-clinton-like-being-in-mob-james-carville-likened-his-years-of-battling-on-behalf-of-bill-clinton-to-working-for-organized-crime-like-being-in-the-mafia-newsmax-march-27-2001/

From Dolly Kyle Browning vs Bill Clinton.

“Ms. Kathleen Willey

Plaintiffs seek to question Ms. Willey about threatening incidents she said occurred before her deposition in the Jones case. The incidents — nails in her car tires, the disappearance of the family cat, and an unknown (at the time) jogger who questioned her about the prior two incidents, asking “Don’t you get the message?” – were apparently an effort to intimidate her from giving truthful testimony in the Jonescase. Plaintiffs also want to question her about her statements that Clinton lawyer, Robert Bennett, threatened her suggesting she should plead the Fifth Amendment and hire a criminal defense lawyer before her Jones deposition. Plaintiffs also want to inquire about private investigator Jared Stern who, at the behest of Martin Landow, Democratic Party contributor, was hired to conduct a “noisy” investigation of her during the Jones case and Independent Counsel investigation.

Ms. Willey worked in the White House as a volunteer in 1993. In early 1998, she claimed that she had been sexually groped by Clinton on November 23, 1993, in the same Oval Office room where he later had an affair with Monica Lewinsky. In an interview with 60 Minutes’ Ed Bradley, she stated that Clinton embraced her, kissed her, touched her breast, and placed her hand on his genitals. Willey also told ABC News that two weeks before her January 11, 1997 deposition in the Jones case, she found masses of nails in three of her car tires. Shortly thereafter, her cat, which she had had for many years, disappeared. Then, just before she testified in the Jones case, a jogger stopped her and asked her about her tires, her cat, and her children — by name. “Don’t you get the message?” he asked, and then jogged off. The jogger was recently identified as Cody Shearer, the brother-in-law of Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott and long-time friend of Clinton.

Willey confirmed and elaborated upon her account of this incident in a recent interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews. She described in more detail her encounter with the mysterious jogger in her Virginia neighborhood on January 8, 1998, just days before her deposition in the Jones case:

WILLEY: . . . I went out for a walk. I had my three dogs with me, and I saw a man coming towards me. And I at first thought that he was a neighbor. . . . And he was coming towards me, and he called my – out my name, and he said, ‘Kathleen.’ And I stopped and I said, ‘Yes?’ And he said, ‘Did you ever find your cat?’ And I said, ‘No.’ . . . I’d asked a couple of neighbors to keep an eye out for this family pet, a 13-year-old cat. I’d never told anybody his name. I just described him to these neighbors, and I thought that maybe word had gotten around in the neighborhood  . . ..

And so he asked me, ‘Did you ever find your cat?’ And I said ‘No, I didn’t.’ And I said . . . ‘Not – no, I haven’t, and we – we really miss him.’ And then he said, ‘Did you ever get those tires fixed on your car?’ And I said ‘No.’ And that’s when the hairs started standing up on the back of my neck.

And he said . . . ‘That – that cat of yours, he was a nice cat.’ And he said . . . ‘Bullseye was his name, wasn’t it?’ ‘He was a really nice cat.’ And I said ‘How do you know my cat’s name? I mean, what – how do you know anything about this?’ And then I said, ‘And how do you know about my car and how do you know about the tires?’ And he said, ‘Well, did you ever get them fixed?’ And I said ‘yes, I did.’ . . . It was – it was a very insidious thing, and it was meant to scare me.. . .

MATTHEWS: And it did, to some extent. You testified a couple of days later in a kind of hesitant manner.

WILLEY: He asked me about my children by name. ‘How are your children? How are Shannon and Patrick?’ . . .

WILLEY: He asked how they were and, at the – at this point, I started asking him who he was and what he wanted.

MATTHEWS: Right.

WILLEY: And he just looked me right in the eye and he said, ‘You’re just not getting the message, are you?’ And I turned around and – and ran. I had no business running, and probably ran about 100 yards, I was so frightened, and I turned around and he was gone.

Willey later stated to Matthews that she recognized the man from pictures shown to her by ABC News reporter Jackie Judd. When asked by Matthews if it was Cody Shearer, Willey said that she couldn’t say, citing the Independent Counsel’s investigation. Id. NewsMax.com reports that Willey later told Matthews off camera that the stranger was in fact Clinton operative Cody Shearer.

Willey also told 60 Minutes that she felt pressured by Clinton’s lawyer Bob Bennett. She said that Bennett suggested she plead the Fifth Amendment and hire a criminal lawyer. According to Willey, “the insinuation to me was that Mr. Bennett was implying that I was going to face some kind of a criminal charge for perjury or – or something else, and that I would need an inside the loop – an inside Washington criminal lawyer, and . . . I didn’t and I don’t.”

Willey also stated that Nathan Landow tried to pressure her to keep her story secret. ABC News reported that Landow poured over $247,000 and raised over $600,000 for Clinton’s presidential campaigns. He reportedly pressured Willey in the weeks before and after her Jones deposition to deny her accusation that Clinton groped her, and to state that nothing had in fact happened.

ABC News also reported that a private investigator, Jared Stern, was hired by Landow’s lawyer “to pull Willey’s phone records, to find out what medications Willey might be taking and to conduct a ‘noisy’ investigation aimed at making sure Willey knew she was being watched.” Stern’s lawyer stated that Stern “perceived a situation where he was being asked to do something he wasn’t comfortable with.” As a result, Stern called Willey and left a message – using an alias – warning her that someone wanted to do her harm.

Given this information, Plaintiffs submit that Ms. Willey’s expected testimony is probative of, inter alia, obstruction of justice, obstruction of a criminal investigation, victim/witness tampering, and victim/witness retaliation by Clinton and his agents in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1510, 1512 and 1513.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/08/browning-vs-clinton-plaintiffs-expedited-motion-for-leave-to-perpetuate-testimony-of-threatened-witnesses-case-no-98-1991-gennifer-flowers-juanita-broaddrick-linda-tripp-monica-lewinsky-paul/

From NewsMax September 6, 2000 via Citizen News.

“Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick would have been called to testify at President Clinton’s Senate impeachment trial about attempts to keep her from telling her story, former chief impeachment prosecutor David Schippers says. But he had already ruled her out as a trial witness by the time he learned the details of Broaddrick’s intimidation.

“It was right when we were working on (her case),” Schippers told NewsMax.com in an exclusive Labor Day weekend interview. “Because my investigator, Diana Woznicki, who was just about in daily contact with Broaddrick, would come in and say, ‘Juanita called me. There’s a guy parked outside her house. … She said she felt that somebody was watching her.’ ”

Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.

“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ”

The former mob-buster for Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy reports in his book, “Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment,” that he never intended to call Broaddrick as a witness against the president. But it turns out, there’s more to the story.

“By the time we had learned what they were doing to her, the decisions on witnesses had already been made.” When asked whether he would have called the Clinton rape accuser to testify had he known about the witness tampering in time, Schippers admitted, “Yes, I would have tried to do it.”

But there was another, perhaps even more significant, reason why Broaddrick was never called, which the no-nonsense ex-prosecutor revealed to NewsMax.com for the very first time. “I’ll tell you something. The only way I got her to open up completely (about the details of Clinton’s attack) was to give her my word that I would not use her as a witness.”

That was before Schippers knew about the break-in, the stolen tape, and the surveillance. But still, he refused to break his word to Juanita Broaddrick.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/08/17/schippers-i-wanted-broaddrick-to-testify-they-were-all-over-that-woman-and-it-was-the-type-of-stuff-we-ran-into-with-the-outfit-the-chicago-mob-intimidation-just-by-watching-her-making-the/

 

“AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON,

BY JUANITA BROADDRICK

‘DO YOU REMEMBER?’
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

As I watched Rick Lazio’s interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio’s views
regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.

I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were
twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on
television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and
maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill
Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton’s bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering.
Do you remember? You told the driver, “Bill has talked so much about Juanita”, and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.
Yes, I can answer Brit Hume’s question. You are the same Hillary that you were
twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

Juanita Broaddrick
Arkansas”

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/juanita.htm

Cody Shearer

“Who is Cody Shearer?”

“Journalist Joe Conason — who has a pro-Clinton bias, to put it mildly — later interviewed Shearer, who said he was in San Francisco the day Willey was approached. Shearer provided some details about his stay including bank withdrawals and the place he stayed, including that he by chance ended up sitting next to former Clinton Secretary of State Warren Christopher — who happens to be his brother-in-law’s former boss — on the flight home. The story took an even weirder turn when Pat Buchanan’s mentally ill brother showed up at his house waving a gun the week after Matthews made his allegation that Shearer had intimidated Willey. Matthews would later apologize for naming Shearer, though he claimed that Willey had been the one who originally identified Shearer.

Yes, this stuff reads like it’s straight from the fever swamps of the Clinton years. Still, given Shearer’s history, it’s not hard to see why Matthews, who’s not exactly a card-carrying member of the vast right-wing conspiracy, would suspect of Shearer of doing unsavory things.”

“So who is Talbott’s brother-in-law? His name is Cody Shearer, and a review of his White House connections reveals the possible workings of a new plumber operation.

A self-styled ”free-lance journalist” (although he hasn’t published in nearly a decade), Shearer is a former business associate of Terry Lenzner’s Investigative Group International – the premier opposition-research firm that Dick Morris calls ”the White House secret police.”

Lenzner’s connections with Clinton go to the seamier side of politics. The Clinton campaign hired his firm in 1992 to do ”opposition research,” a euphemism for dirt-digging. Since ’94, the president’s personal lawyers have had Lenzner on the payroll, reportedly searching under the beds and sniffing through the panties-drawers of Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and members of Hillary’s ”Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy,” including Starr’s team.”

“If Hillary Clinton’s “secret spy network” involved the likes of Blumenthal, Drumheller, and Shearer — men whose past deeds suggest they may not be trustworthy — this ought to because for serious alarm. At a minimum, it demands that Congressional overseers take a closer look at what these people were doing on behalf of Hillary Clinton. Bear in mind, this team wasn’t just sending Hillary Clinton intelligence briefings. They had contracted out to a company, Osprey Global Solutions, run by a former General and Delta Force member, David L. Grange, to do fieldwork and intelligence gathering in Tunisia.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/meet-the-men-behind-hillary-clintons-private-spy-network/article/901675

Disclaimer: The use of the words wicked leaks is not tied to or a reference to the book “Wicked Leaks” by Matt Bendoris.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

15 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, corruption, Crime, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton, Lies, Terrorists

Tagged , , ,

Wikileaks Assange tweets state that media made up HRC leak story, Hope to publish every week for next 10 weeks, Real Hillary story was “Can’t we just drone this guy?” and history of Clinton camp threats, Many Clinton associates threatened and/or killed

Posted on October 4, 2016 | 7 comments

Wikileaks Assange tweets state that media made up HRC leak story, Hope to publish every week for next 10 weeks, Real Hillary story was “Can’t we just drone this guy?” and history of Clinton camp threats, Many Clinton associates threatened and/or killed

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

From Wikileaks Twitter Account:

  2. 26m26 minutes ago

    WikiLeaks Retweeted WikiLeaks Task Force

    WikiLeaks is building an army to protect and promote its upcoming publications. Follow

    WikiLeaks added,

    We are the Task Force. Join us, help defend WikiLeaks against attacks.

  3. 1h1 hour ago

    > Media makes up story that WikiLeaks press conference is for HRC leak. > Media gets mad when WikiLeaks press conference isn’t for HRC leak.

  4. 2h2 hours ago

    : Regarding upcoming publications… We hope to be publishing every week for the next 10 weeks.

  5. 2h2 hours ago

    : Follow and on Twitter to help defend WikiLeaks as it continues publications for this year.

  6. 2h2 hours ago

    : The documents themselves are revealing, but also the government/state reactions to the releases are revealing also.

  7. 2h2 hours ago

    : WikiLeaks has released 10 million documents over 10 years. That’s 10 billion words, averaging 3000 docs a day.

  8. 2h2 hours ago

    “Assassinate Assange” video currently being shown at WikiLeaks 10 Year Anniversary press conference.

  9. 3h3 hours ago

    WikiLeaks 10 Year press conference in Berlin has begun. Currently showing WikiLeaks Top 10 video.

  10. 3h3 hours ago

    What has WikiLeaks published over the past ten years? Check out the WikiLeaks Top 10.

  11. 4h4 hours ago

    In 30 min: WikiLeaks 10 Year Anniversary begins with Berlin press conference

 

Wikileaks, Assange did not promise a Hillary leak.

But what he did yesterday was highlight the real threats coming from Hillary and the Clinton camp.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?”

The email sent to Hillary which stated:

“an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

Not to mention the video of Bob Beckel stating that Assange should be killed.

If you have been paying attention, you know that a great many Clinton associates have been threatened and/or killed over decades.

Their threats have to be taken seriously.

“We have more info and we will publish everything when the time is right some of these materials can get Hillary Clinton to lose the nomination,” …Julain Assange

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

7 Comments

Posted in Big Brother, Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton

Tagged , , ,

Hillary wicked leaks reveal past Clinton evils, Larry Patterson Arkansas state trooper 6 year governor security detail, Newsmax TV interview, N word was often used, Vince Foster coverup, Patterson was threatened

Posted on October 3, 2016 | 10 comments

Hillary wicked leaks reveal past Clinton evils, Larry Patterson Arkansas state trooper 6 year governor security detail, Newsmax TV interview, N word was often used, Vince Foster coverup, Patterson was threatened

“George, in 1993 there was a total of 4 Arkansas State policemen who worked on the Governor’s Security Detail who came forward to tell their stories about what they had seen, what they had experienced in Arkansas working for Bill Clinton. And the major news media, they gave it a day, 2 days, play and then that was it, George. Then the Clinton spin doctors got a hold of it and it was to discredit the State Police – to destroy us.”…Larry Patterson, Arkansas State Trooper

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

The Julian Assange Wikileaks leaks are extremely important. Especially in the hyper Orwellian age we live in and uber biased mainstream media.

I also believe that the wicked leaks from Citizen Wells are too.

Most people have not seen this information, resurrected to the internet.

From NewsMax September 14, 1999 via Citizen News.

“More Than Sex

TV Interview of Clinton bodyguard Larry Patterson by George Putnam”

“You know, for 32 years, Trooper Patterson served with the Arkansas State Police. A highly commended officer, Patterson was assigned to the elite Governor’s Security Detail and for 6 years – day in day out – Patterson guarded Governor Bill Clinton. For 6 years Trooper Patterson lived intimately with Bill and Hillary Clinton. For 6 years, he became knowledgeable of their intimate secrets.

The establishment media has been telling you it’s just about sex and censoring and smearing this trooper. Well, today Larry Patterson is right here with us to tell us the Clintons’ story as his audio tape set says is “More Than Sex.” I want to welcome one of our true patriots in America, a dear friend of mine, Mr. Larry Patterson. Welcome Larry.

LP: Thank you, George. It’s a pleasure.

GP: You know, Larry, the question on everybody’s mind is: Is Hillary Clinton running for the Senate back there in New York?

LP: George, I can’t believe that this lady is going to make a run for the Senate. I can’t believe that she can stand the intense scrutiny that the media is going to give her.

GP: You knew this lady. Will you tell us what you can about her?

LP: George, I’ve never been around anyone as possessed and as driven as Hillary Clinton was. In 6 years, you rarely saw this lady ever let her hair down, ever enjoy herself. She wanted the presidency as much or more than Bill Clinton wanted it.

GP: Obviously you know; you know well about Clinton’s womanizing and you saw it firsthand. You know all the sordid details. Without being too graphic, Larry, would you explain some of the things you witnessed?

LP: Well, from blocking streets, George, late at night; sitting in ladies’ driveways till 3:00 and 4:00 in the morning… arranging these liaisons for the Governor…

GP: You know, Bill Clinton told the American people point blank on “60 Minutes” that he didn’t have an affair with Gennifer Flowers.

LP: I spent many hours in front of Gennifer Flowers’ apartment complex. I took literally 100 calls from Gennifer Flowers; she would call the mansion and said, “Let me talk to Bill.” It wasn’t “the Governor” or “Governor Clinton.” It was “Let me talk to Bill.”

GP: But you allege that he engaged in a massive abuse of power. It was, as you say, “More Than Sex.”

LP: George, the State Police Detail assigned to Bill Clinton was used to pimp. He would send us out in the crowd to get women’s names and telephone numbers and then in a week or two weeks or a month, they would end up in a state job or they would end up working in one of his campaigns. We blocked streets at night, we set in front of residences till the wee hours in the morning waiting on this man to come out…

GP: You tell of an incident outside Chelsea’s school – it was on parent/teacher’s night – when Bill Clinton went to meet her teachers.

LP: He had me block the street in front of Chelsea’s elementary school while he met a lady there, George, and had a liaison with this lady late at night.

GP: Right there?

LP: Blocked the street – the driveway going into the school, George.

GP: “More Than Sex” paints an intimate portrait of the Clintons at home. Now you say, Larry, that there were a lot of verbal arguments between Hillary and Bill and you claim that they would often make slurs against each other – anti-Semitic slurs, right?

LP: George, if these people were together for more than 3 or 4 hours, they were at each other, they were fighting; and many many times the anti-Semitic slurs were used. The “N” word was often used.

GP: And at one point, Bill Clinton made some shocking comments about a fellow state trooper – one who had died in the line of duty.

LP: George, he was in Southwest Arkansas at this trooper’s funeral and he made the statement in front of two other state policemen, “Well, I don’t know what the big deal is – he was just a ‘G-D-‘ pig…”

GP: Gasped- What!

GP: Larry, I want to stop you for a moment. We haven’t heard any of this in the press. Is this new? Is this all new material? Why haven’t we heard about it before?

LP: George, in 1993 there was a total of 4 Arkansas State policemen who worked on the Governor’s Security Detail who came forward to tell their stories about what they had seen, what they had experienced in Arkansas working for Bill Clinton. And the major news media, they gave it a day, 2 days, play and then that was it, George. Then the Clinton spin doctors got a hold of it and it was to discredit the State Police – to destroy us.

GP: You know, I’m amazed by your information, Larry. But there’s something more serious than anything else that we’ve talked about. It’s about Vincent Foster, the Former Deputy White House Counsel. In 1993 he died very suspiciously of a gunshot wound to the head. The government said he committed suicide; but two national …polls show that more than two-thirds of Americans don’t believe that and many believe he was in fact murdered. Now, you knew Vince Foster, didn’t you?

LP: Yes.

GP: Tell us about him.

LP: He was a partner in the Rose Law Firm and was a frequent visitor at the mansion. He was around many public events that the Governor and Hillary attended and was always very friendly and asked if he could be of any help if we ever needed anything. He was a very personable man, a good-looking guy, George.

GP: Now, let me ask you right now, point blank. You’re a cop – a damn good cop. You’re a sworn police officer. You’ve seen homicides. Do you believe Vince Foster actually killed himself?

LP: No I don’t and I don’t believe that he’d kill himself – if he did kill himself – in Fort Marcy Park.

GP: One of the reasons you say that Foster didn’t kill himself – you claim that you knew about Foster’s death before the park police had even found his body – at least 2 hours before the government said that they knew that Vince Foster was the dead man lying out there in the park.

LP: George, the shift I was working was 7:30 to 4:30. I had just left my employment at the State Police, had driven to my apartment, walked in the door, the phone was ringing, it was Roger Perry – another other trooper working at the Governor’s mansion. Roger had received a telephone call from Helen Dickey calling the Arkansas Governor’s mansion. Roger said Helen Dickey’s words were these verbatim: “Roger, Vince Foster has been found in the parking lot of the White House, dead in his car, of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound.”

GP: The time situation…

LP: George, it was around 5:00 Central Standard Time.

GP: What you’re saying, Larry, is that people knew of Foster’s death before the officials claim that they found the body. What you’re saying, Larry, one need not be a Columbo, some kind of a detective, (to see) that there was a cover-up of this man’s death and that this cover-up is really bigger than the third-rate burglary at the Watergate. Larry, there have been several investigations into the Foster death but all have concluded suicide. Did special counsel Robert Fiske who first claimed to have a look into this – did he speak to you?

LP: No he did not.

GP: What? Never?

LP: Never.

GP: Did Ken Starr ever bring you before the Grand Jury on this overall matter?

LP: Never, George.

GP: What?

LP: Never.

GP: As you know, Larry, in 1996 the Senate Whitewater Committee was so concerned about your allegations that they actually had hearings. They brought Helen Dickey before the Committee. Let’s take a look at a video clip of that hearing:

Senate Whitewater Investigation – Feb. 15, 1996

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: Do you recall, Miss Dickey, submitting an affidavit in September of ’95 to us?

Helen Dickey, Clinton Babysitter: Yes I do.

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: And that affidavit was consistent with your testimony here today…

Helen Dickey, Clinton Babysitter: Yes.

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: …in terms of the time that you made this call. The whole thing arose because a couple of former Arkansas State Troopers submitted affidavits that suggested that the call was much earlier – at 6:30 – and that was the purported basis upon which we have this headline story: “Foster Shot in White House Parking Lot” and so forth… or “Foster Committed Suicide in White House Parking Lot.” And as a result of those affidavits we then asked for the time records or the work records of the troopers in question and then the attorney for the troopers said, well, maybe the troopers didn’t want to testify after all.

GP: Helen Dickey says, “No, you’re wrong.” She made the call late that night. And the Senate Counsel – you heard him – he says that they checked your work records and that you and Trooper Perry refused to testify before the Committee. What’s this?

LP: I was never asked to testify. If I had been asked to testify, George, I would have been there.

GP: Never called to testify…

LP: That is true.

GP: Well, let’s make this crystal clear. The Senate held hearings about your allegations but they didn’t even bother to call you – the Senate Committee bold-faced lied about it. They lied to us – the American people.

LP: That is true.

GP: You’re an American hero. I know that you have been offered jobs and promotions to obtain your silence. You were threatened; you still are. But you spoke out and you’ve made some shocking disclosures and I’ve listened to your story on “More Than Sex” – on that taped set. You know, Larry, this proves to me that the American people are not being told the full story, the whole truth. You make many more new and shocking revelations on your audio set – “More Than Sex” – some of the things that, well, we can’t talk about on national television. Let me encourage people to get your taped set.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/10/02/more-than-sex-tv-interview-of-clinton-bodyguard-larry-patterson-by-george-putnam-arkansas-trooper-patterson-lived-intimately-with-bill-and-hillary-clinton-the-n-word-was-often-used-clinton-spi/

Declaration of Gennifer G. Flowers March 12, 1998.

“My name is Gennifer G. Flowers. I am over twenty-one years of age and I am fully competent to make this declaration.

1. I met Bill Clinton in 1977 while I was working as a news reporter for KARK-TV in Little Rock, Arkansas. Shortly after we met, we began a sexual relationship that lasted for twelve years.

2. In the late 1970’s I moved away from Little Rock, living in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Branson, Missouri and Dallas, Texas. Bill Clinton and I maintained our relationship during this time. I returned to Little Rock in the mid-1980’s. We discussed my return to Little Rock and he indicated that he wanted to see me and continue our personal relationship. He encouraged me to come back and advised me to move into Quapaw Tower, a high-rise apartment building located in Little Rock. He told me that he had aides in the building and that it wouldn’t be so noticeable for him to come to that building to visit me. Chris Burrows, an employee of the State of Arkansas lived in the building.

3. Once I moved to the Quapaw Tower in Little Rock we continued our personal relationship on a more regular basis. Arkansas security officers assigned to the Governor’s Office drove Bill to the building and waited for him while he visited me. Bill’s visits were observed by and talked about by a watchman employed by Quapaw Tower, which upset Bill as he intensely verbalized in my tape-recorded conversation with him of December 1990. John Kauffman, manager of Quapaw Tower witnessed Bill’s visits to my apartment and complained about his car and driver parking in the building’s unloading zone for hours at a time.

4. Bill Clinton also instructed me to call either Larry Patterson or Roger Perry in order to communicate. He told me that he felt that he could trust them, and they were people that would help us communicate when necessary.

5. In early 1990 I told Bill Clinton that I wanted a job with the state. Bill Clinton told me to contact his assistant Judy Gaddy who would assist me with the application for employment. I met with Judy Gaddy in her office and she provided me with the details of what needed to be on the application. Judy Gaddy also told me to contact Clara Clark who set up a job interview for me. I was eventually employed by the state as an administrative assistant for the Arkansas Appeal Tribunal.

6. Shortly after I was employed by the state, another woman who had applied for my job filed a grievance or some sort of complaint in which she alleged that she was more qualified and implied that the only reason I got the job was because I had had an affair with Bill Clinton. I was called to testify before a panel in connection with this proceeding. When I learned that I would have to testify, I did not know what to do, so I called Bill Clinton. I told him that I had been called to testify and asked what I should say. He told me to deny that we had ever had an affair. During the proceeding, when questions came up about my relationship to Bill, Don Barnes, his appointee and head of the commission, stopped the questioning.

7. On several occasions, I discussed with Bill Clinton the subject of inquiries by the media about our relationship. He told me to continue to deny our relationship, that if we would stick together, everything would be okay. In one conversation which occurred while Bill Clinton was running for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 1991, we were discussing media coverage of Larry Nichols’ lawsuit and the women who were alleged in the complaint in that lawsuit to have had affairs with Bill Clinton. In that context he said: “…if all the people who are named [in the Nichols lawsuit] deny it. That’s all, I mean, I expect them to look into it and interview you and everything, uh, but I just think that if everybody is on the record denying it, you got no problem.”

8. The conversations in this Declaration also refer to the tape-recorded conversations I had with Bill Clinton in 1990 and 1991. Those recordings were not altered or “doctored” in any manner.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on March 12, 1998
(signed)
Gennifer G. Flowers”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/docs/flowers031398.htm

From the Washington Post December 21, 1993.

“Clinton Tried To Derail Troopers’ Sex Allegations”

“President Clinton and other administration officials engaged in an extensive effort in recent months to prevent publication of allegations that Clinton as governor of Arkansas used his security detail to facilitate extramarital affairs, the White House acknowledged yesterday.

White House aides said Clinton had personally spoken with several Arkansas state troopers. But they denied that Clinton sought improperly to pressure the troopers not to talk to reporters and said that Clinton was merely seeking information about what false stories were being spread about him.

In a statement released last night, presidential adviser Bruce Lindsey said that Clinton spoke with the troopers after a longtime member of his security detail in Arkansas contacted him several months ago “with information that the prospects of large sums of money were being dangled before several members of his former security details for stories – regardless of whether they were true or not – to discredit the president and his family.”

Two members of Clinton’s former security detail, Roger Perry and Larry Patterson, have alleged in television interviews and in a lengthy article in the American Spectator magazine that they and other troopers helped Clinton meet women, booked hotel rooms for liaisons and brought a woman into the Arkansas Governor’s Mansion after Clinton was elected president. The men have acknowledged that they are interested in writing a book about their time with the Clintons, and are represented by one of Clinton’s Arkansas political enemies, lawyer Cliff Jackson.

The allegations forced the White House to address again an issue that has periodically plagued Clinton since last year’s campaign, when a former nightclub singer, Gennifer Flowers, alleged that she had conducted a 12-year affair with the Arkansas governor and was provided a state job to remain silent about it.”

“In the magazine article, written by conservative journalist David Brock, the two troopers are quoted as providing highly detailed accounts of Clinton’s alleged affairs with numerous women. They also make allegations about a strained relationship between Clinton and his wife, including accounts of extensive vulgarity.”

“Davis and Jackson said they were initially contacted by four troopers, including Ferguson, about arranging a book deal and publicizing allegations about Clinton.

But Ferguson and the fourth trooper, Ronnie Anderson, decided not to speak out after the White House pressured them, Jackson said. Perry, who is president of the Arkansas State Troopers Association, andPatterson have “been intimidated and threatened” over their decision to go public, Jackson said.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/stories/pj122193.htm

Disclaimer: The use of the words wicked leaks is not tied to or a reference to the book “Wicked Leaks” by Matt Bendoris.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

10 Comments

Posted in 1984, Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, corruption, Crime, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton, Lies, media, Orwellian

Tagged , , , , ,

NY Times: How Hillary Clinton grappled with Bill Clinton’s infidelity and his accusers, Wicked Leaks will reveal truth, Hillary terrorist using violence threats or intimidation to achieve a political aim, Clintons victims cowering in fear

Posted on October 3, 2016 | 2 comments

NY Times: How Hillary Clinton grappled with Bill Clinton’s infidelity and his accusers, Wicked Leaks will reveal truth, Hillary terrorist using violence threats or intimidation to achieve a political aim, Clintons victims cowering in fear

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.”…”The Clintons’ War on Women”

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Wicked Leaks.

A new Citizen Wells initiative, which like Wiki Leaks will bring to the light information hidden from the public.

Most of the information revealed by Citizen Wells has been scrubbed or diminished in search engines.

Other articles and facts have become topical again and deserve to be read by a new audience of younger people and others now using the internet.

It is fitting and proper that a new NY Times article, covering for Hillary and obfuscating the truth, be highlighted in this introduction.

I will be presenting a small portion of the article at this time to prevent mass nausea and blood pressure rises.

From the NY Times October 2, 2016.

“The enduring image of Mrs. Clinton from that campaign was a “60 Minutes” interview in which she told the country she was not blindly supporting her husband out of wifely duty. “I’m not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette,” she said.

But stand by she did, holding any pain or doubts in check as the campaign battled to keep the Clintons’ political aspirations alive.

Last week, Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee,criticized Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Clinton’s affairs and her response to them, and said he might talk more about the issue in the final weeks before the election.

That could be a treacherous strategy for Mr. Trump, given his own past infidelity and questionable treatment of women. Many voters, particularly women, might see Mrs. Clinton being blamed for her husband’s conduct.

It could also remind voters of a searing period in American history, and in Mrs. Clinton’s life.

Confronting a spouse’s unfaithfulness is painful under any circumstance. For Mrs. Clinton, it happened repeatedly and in the most public of ways, unfolding at the dawn of the 24/7 news cycle, and later in impeachment proceedings that convulsed the nation.

Outwardly, she remained stoic and defiant, defending her husband while a progression of women and well-funded conservative operatives accused Mr. Clinton of behavior unbecoming the leader of the free world.

But privately, she embraced the Clinton campaign’s aggressive strategy of counterattack: Women who claimed to have had sexual encounters with Mr. Clinton would become targets of digging and discrediting — tactics that women’s rights advocates frequently denounce.”

“Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort, as described in interviews, internal campaign records and archives, is still the subject of debate. By some accounts, she gave the green light and was a motivating force; by others, her support was no more than tacit assent.”

Dolly Kyle Browning has known the Clintons for decades.

“Aaron, Hillary is an enabler is about the nicest thing you can say about her,” stated Kyle when asked about a statement last Friday from Donald Trump, who slammed Hillary Clinton as an “unbelievably nasty, mean enabler” who “destroyed” the lives of her husband’s mistresses and alleged victims.

Continued Kyle: “The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim. … That’s what terrorism is. It changes people’s lives by changing their decisions about what they would otherwise do. And these women who might otherwise speak up are so afraid that they won’t say anything.”

Kyle alleged that there are many other Clinton lovers and purported assault victims who would likely speak out, but who instead “are cowering in fear because of the terrorism.”

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/15/exclusive-clintons-alleged-ex-lover-hillary-terrorist-sex-addict-bill-told-2000-women/

From Dolly Kyle Browning, et al vs William Jefferson Clinton.

“Plaintiff Dolly Kyle Browning has been intentionally and maliciously threatened by Clinton and his agents, including Lindsey. See id. at ¶¶ 131-33. They threatened to “destroy” her if she told the media about her sexual relationship with Clinton. See id. at ¶ 131. They also warned her not to publish her book, Purposes of the Heart, which depicts that 30-year relationship. See id. In addition, Clinton, acting through Lindsey, threatened and intimidated Mrs. Browning into severely limiting her public statements about her relationship with Clinton. Id.

Most significant to the instant motion, Clinton and Lindsey also knowingly used threats and intimidation to prevent Mrs. Browning from testifying in the Paula Jones civil rights/sexual harassment lawsuit (“the Jones case”). They directed Clinton’s lawyers to draft a motion to quash her deposition subpoena, and pressured Mrs. Browning to file it with the court. See id. at ¶¶ 61-64. Mrs. Browning, a member of the Texas Bar and officer of the court, refused to comply, and was deposed in the Jones case on October 28, 1997. See id. at ¶¶ 2, 64-65. Clinton and his agents then followed through on their threats against Mrs. Browning. Among other things, they defamed her, publicly branding her a liar out to “get” the President, and knowingly circulating false and derogatory information about her character and motivations.See, e.g., id. at ¶¶ 67, 69, 71-74, 79-81.

Remarkably similar threatening tactics have been directed at other women who, like Mrs. Browning, have personal knowledge of Clinton’s misconduct and were sought as witnesses in official proceedings against Clinton. See id. at ¶ 134. Plaintiffs referred in their Amended Complaint to the threats and retaliation by Clinton and his agents against Kathleen Willey and Linda Tripp when they were called to testify in the Jones case and the Independent Counsel’s investigation of the Lewinsky affair. Indeed, the number of women who have suffered from these “Clintonian” tactics is significant. On March 11, 1999,Investor’s Business Daily reported that at least nine (9) women have now charged that Clinton “personally assaulted them or, through his ‘agents’ or ‘people,’ threatened to do them or their families physical harm.” The list includes Dolly Kyle Browning, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Corbin Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky, Linda Tripp, Sally Perdue, and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. “And all of them say they’re afraid for their safety so long as he remains in power.”

Because of the threats, intimidation, and retaliation directed at these women, their fear for their safety, and the enormous power and means available to Clinton and Lindsey, Plaintiffs must perpetuate the testimony of these women without delay. Their testimony will substantiate Plaintiffs’ RICO allegations, and is both competent and highly relevant to Plaintiffs’ case. As RICO witnesses against the highest officials in our government, these women are at enormous risk. Every moment of delay provides Clinton and Lindsey with additional opportunities to threaten them and/or their families, and enhances the chances that their testimony will be lost forever. Plaintiffs cannot obtain the testimony of these witnesses through the ordinary course of discovery in this case as all discovery has been stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the outstanding motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully move the Court for leave to perpetuate the testimony of these witnesses or, in the alternative, to commence limited discovery to take their depositions.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/08/browning-vs-clinton-plaintiffs-expedited-motion-for-leave-to-perpetuate-testimony-of-threatened-witnesses-case-no-98-1991-gennifer-flowers-juanita-broaddrick-linda-tripp-monica-lewinsky-paul/

There is much much more information available to respond to this article and the Clintons’ evil and corrupt past.

Just as with Wiki Leaks, much has been revealed and much more is to come.

Wicked Leaks.

Revealing the Clintons’ evil and corrupt past.

Most of the scrubbed articles resurrected can be viewed here.

http://citizenwells.net/

Disclaimer: The use of the words wicked leaks is not tied to or a reference to the book “Wicked Leaks” by Matt Bendoris.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Bribery, Bribes, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, corruption, Crime, Election, Election 2016, Evil, Hillary Clinton, NY Times

Tagged , , ,

Hillary: “Can’t we just drone this guy?”, Sources?, Simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks, Julian Assange quotes article on Twitter, Email to Hillary: “SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

Posted on October 3, 2016 | 19 comments

Hillary: “Can’t we just drone this guy?”, Sources?, Simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks, Julian Assange quotes article on Twitter, Email to Hillary: “SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

“We have more info and we will publish everything when the time is right some of these materials can get Hillary Clinton to lose the nomination,” …Julain Assange

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

From Wikileaks Twitter account:

39m39 minutes ago

To Silence Wikileaks, Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange — report

https://twitter.com/i/cards/tfw/v1/782909905724403712?cardname=summary_large_image&autoplay_disabled=true&forward=true&earned=true&lang=en&card_height=344#xdm_e=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com&xdm_c=default1452&xdm_p=1
1,159 retweets802 likes
 
https://twitter.com/wikileaks

From True Pundit October 2, 2016.

“Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange”

“Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.”

“Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”

“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughter’s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a “low profile” in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clinton’s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.

hillaryemailwikinonlegalstrategies

Slaughter’s cryptic email also contained an attached document called “SP Wikileaks doc final11.23.10.docx.” That attachment portion of Slaughter’s “nonlegal strategies” email has yet to be recovered by federal investigators and House committee investigators probing Clinton’s email practices while at State. Even Wikileaks does not have the document. Slaughter, however, shed some light on the attachment: “The result is the attached memo, which has one interesting legal approach and I think some very good suggestions about how to handle our public diplomacy.”

But did it also include details on the “nonlegal strategies” teased in the subject line?”

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

19 Comments

Posted in Clintons, Hillary Clinton

Tagged , , , ,

Hillary Alicia Machado choice consistent with Clintons crime corruption and immigration policies, Clinton administration pushed rapid naturalization and allowing citizenship to criminals, Democrat David Schippers exposed pressure on INS for votes

Posted on October 1, 2016 | 37 comments

Hillary Hillary Alicia Machado choice consistent with Clintons crime corruption and immigration policies, Clinton administration pushed rapid naturalization and allowing citizenship to criminals, Democrat David Schippers exposed pressure on INS for votes

“I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigration.”…Hillary Clinton, WABC 2003

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Hillary Clinton believes that using Alicia Machado to taint Donald Trump in the eyes of women and voters is a good idea. That is because she is so used to acting like and associating with criminals and being involved in shady activities, she doesn’t think a thing of it.

For anyone paying attention this will backfire on her.

From American Action News September 28, 2016.

“Who is Alicia Machado? The Truth”

“Who is Alicia Machado and how did she become a US citizen?

As Hillary made her finals remarks in the first presidential debate, she proudly proclaimed that she stood with Trump bullying victim Alicia Machado. Personally, I find the notion of hurling insults at women (including Rosie O’Donnell) on the basis of their physical appearance distasteful.  When I heard Trump called Machado names like “Little Miss Piggy” I didn’t like it. Even though as a Miss Universe, Machado’s job was to maintain her weight and physical appearance, I will concede calling someone “Little Miss Piggy” or “Miss Housekeeping” is a little much. At the same time, time people within the pageant have claimed she was extremely difficult to deal with.

But that’s neither here nor there. After the debate, many news and media outlets such as NBC, CNN, and Inside Edition  produced “Who’s Alicia Machado?” pieces. In all of these stories, her bio went from winning Miss Universe and being bullied by Trump to becoming a US citizen. It was similar to their coverage of Barack Obama in 2008, where apparently he had nothing occur in his life between being President of the Harvard Law Review and giving a speech at the 2004 DNC. As I watched sympathetic piece after sympathetic piece, in my gut I knew there was something wrong with the name Alicia Machado. No, it was not implicit bias or racial profiling that caused me to feel this. It was an interview with Anderson Cooper.

Amazingly, overnight, Machado’s Wikipedia page was edited, so I had to do a little digging to research many of the things I had heard about her. According to Associated Press reports in January 1998, Machado was accused in court documents of driving her ex-boyfriend Juan Rodriguez Reggeti to shoot his brother-in-law, Francisco Antonio Sbert Mousko, outside the funeral of Mousko’s wife as she was being eulogized. In addition to being the victim’s wife, the dead woman was also Reggeti’s sister.

Machado was ordered to testify in court as her attorney’s claimed she was filming a soap opera. In February of 1998 the Associated Press published a report that a Venezuelan judge claimed Machado threatened to kill him after he indicted her boyfriend for attempted murder. Venezuelan beauty queen Alicia Machado threatened “to ruin my career as a judge and … kill me,” Judge Maximiliano Fuenmayor said on national television. There were also claims that Machado’s boyfriend snatched the shooting victim’s 11-year-old son, his nephew. Machado would avoid prosecution because witnesses could not be produced to testify against her. At the same time, her alibi was never corroborated by witnesses.

We don’t know if Machado is guilty of any crime, but considering all of this, Machado’s recent interview with Anderson Cooper is troubling. In contrast to many of his colleagues, Cooper apparently does his due diligence. During the interview Cooper asked Machado, “There are reports that Trump surrogates tonight have been referencing and pointing to on CNN and elsewhere about an incident in 1998 in Venezuela, where you were accused of driving a getaway car from a murder scene. You were never charged with this,” Cooper said. “The judge in the case also said you threatened to kill him after he indicted your boyfriend for the attempted murder. I just want to give you a chance to address these reports that the Trump surrogates are talking about,” Cooper continued. Machado’s response was, “You know, I have my past. Of course, everybody has a past. I’m not a saint girl. But that is not the point now.” Quite frankly, that is as perplexing as it is honest. The typical response of an innocent person when accused of being an accessory to murder would be to rebut or deny the allegations. Machado did neither; she essentially admitted her involvement in a case she was never even charged in.”

“Hillary utilizing Machado as a political prop does not surprise me. Hillary is a low character individual who is desperate for the presidency. What concerns me about this situation is how someone like Alicia Machado was ever granted US citizenship. Becoming a United States citizen is a privilege; there’s a diverse pool of applicants, ranging from hard working laborers to highly educated scientists. Many are dying for a chance to become a citizen and live out the American Dream, and yet, we grant citizenship to someone with the baggage of Machado? Granting citizenship to a person of Machado’s character devalues what it means to became a naturalized citizen. In the end, Machado is no victim. She’s a reminder of how sick and twisted the Clintons are, and a poster child for why we need immigration reform.”

http://americanactionnews.com/articles/who-is-alicia-machado-the-truth#WHkGHRoPlScYohWl.99″

From David Schippers book, “Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment”.

“My staff and I agreed that we needed to focus on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which appeared to be running out of control. By the time we came to the subject, investigations by the General Accounting Office (GAO) and congressional committees had already indicated that the White House used the INS to further its political agenda. A blatant politicization of the agency took place during the 1996 presidential campaign when the White House pressured the INS into expediting its “Citizenship USA” (CUSA) program to grant citizenship to thousands of aliens that the White House counted as likely Democratic voters. To ensure maximum impact, the INS concentrated on aliens in key states — California, Florida, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, and Texas — that hold a combined 181 electoral votes, just 89 short of the total needed to win the election.

The program was placed under the direction of Vice President Al Gore. We received from the GAO a few e-mails indicating Vice President Gore’s role in the plan (which are included in Appendix A at the back of the book). He was responsible for keeping the pressure on, to make sure the aliens were pushed through by September 1, the last day to register for the presidential election.

In our investigation we uncovered a case study evidencing what is pejoratively known in political science circles as “Chicago Politics.”

Back in the early years of the twentieth century, “Hinky Dink” Kenna and “Bathouse” John Coughlin were recognized as the very models of the unsavory Chicago politician. The two once fixed an aldermanic election in Chicago’s First Ward. To do so, they imported thousands of ward heelers, friends, associates, and city workers and had them registered to vote from every building in the ward — from homes (of which there were few) to taverns and cribs (of which there were many). On Election Day the recent arrivals stopped at Hinky Dink’s tavern, picked up fifty cents, ate a free lunch, and went out to vote their consciences. Guess who won that election?

Essentially, the same tactics were used during President Clinton’s reelection in 1996. Only this time the Democrats weren’t handing out sandwiches. Instead, through CUSA, they were circumventing normal procedures for naturalizing aliens — procedures that check backgrounds and weed out criminals — and consequently they were handing out citizenship papers to questionable characters.”

“The White House wanted any applicant for citizenship to be naturalized in time to register for the November election, so the pressure on the INS was constant. On March 21 Elaine Kamarck in the Vice President’s office sent an e-mail to Farbrother saying: “THE PRESIDENT IS SICK OF THIS AND WANTS ACTION. IF NOTHING MOVES TODAY WE’LL HAVE TO TAKE SOME PRETTY DRASTIC MEASURES.” Farbrother responded, “I favor drastic measures.” If he couldn’t get what he wanted from the INS, he wrote, he would “call for heavy artillery.””

“Federal regulations require that, for an alien to obtain citizenship, his application for naturalization (citizenship) must be accompanied by a complete set of the alien’s fingerprints. The fingerprint cards are then sent to the FBI to determine if the applicant has a criminal or arrest record. The law provides that an application may be denied if the alien has a serious criminal record or if he falsely denies ever having been arrested, even if he was never convicted.

In the INS district offices, the alien applicant for naturalization cannot be scheduled for a personal interview until at least 60 days after the application is submitted. This delay is specifically intended to allow sufficient time for an FBI fingerprint check. If the check reveals an arrest record identification, the arrest report is inserted in the alien’s file prior to the interview. An arrest record does not automatically result in a denial of citizenship, but it alerts an examiner to spend additional time questioning the applicant and to request that he furnish further information.

If there is no criminal arrest record in the file prior to the interview, the examiner will assume that none exists. For that reason, the INS has always considered the FBI fingerprint check to be the only practical way of preventing violent felons, dope peddlers, and the like from obtaining citizenship. Any breakdown in the collecting, checking, and reporting of the fingerprints can cause a breakdown of the entire process.

In our investigation we developed sources inside the INS with specific knowledge of the facts who revealed that FBI arrest records that were being sent to the Chicago INS office simply were not being inserted into the aliens’ files. As a result, aliens with criminal records were being granted citizenship.

Our sources also disclosed that, just prior to the 1996 voter registration deadline, a box was discovered in the Chicago INS office containing nearly five thousand FBI arrest reports — reports that had arrived in time but had been ignored.

Later, when the office discovered that those reports had never been processed, the INS initially tried to blame the FBI, claiming that the Bureau had not provided the arrest records within the 60-day window. But the FBI had done its job in a timely manner. Then the INS tried to convince the public that the foul-up really hadn’t harmed the process much. The agency cited statistics showing that the rejection rate of 17 percent was just about what it had always been, so no harm, no foul. But the INS neglected to take into account the thousands of aliens with criminal arrest records who were not rejected, even though they would have been under the normal procedures. If the traditional process had been followed, the rejection rate in the summer of 1996 would have easily exceeded 30 percent and perhaps have been even higher.

The White House, the INS, and the Justice Department publicly denied any political motive in the CUSA program to expedite the citizenship procedure. What the United States got is undeniable:
More than 75,000 new citizens who had arrest records when they applied;

An additional 115,000 citizens whose fingerprints were unclassifiable for various technical reasons and were never resubmitted; and

Another 61,000 people who were given citizenship with no fingerprints submitted at all.
Those numbers were developed by the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick as a result of an audit of the 1996 CUSA program.

What we had here was a perfect example of the Clinton-Gore administration’s overarching political philosophy: “The ends justify the means,” coupled with “win at any cost.” It was a philosophy of governance that, as our investigations into other areas proceeded, we would find repeated again and again.

When the results of the KPMG Peat Marwick audit were made public, the INS and Justice vowed to remedy the situation, root out the felons, and revoke erroneously awarded citizenship. Everyone congratulated the administration for acting so quickly — and then promptly forgot about it.”

“We received no cooperation from either the Justice Department or the INS. Instead we received nothing but complaints about not going through the proper channels, investigating old news, being partisan — if not racist — and so on. But we reasoned that if criminals were given citizenship in 1996, at least some of them had probably continued their criminal activity in the two years since. We asked the GAO — an investigative agency that works for Congress and is therefore not subject to White House or Justice Department pressures — to give us FBI arrest records related to the CUSA program. We were given unquestioned cooperation and boxes of FBI reports.

We reviewed every document in those boxes, pulling out about a hundred of the most violent or serious crimes committed by aliens prior to naturalization and documented by arrest records. I specifically excluded minor immigration crimes, tax offenses, or white-collar crimes such as driving under the influence. I asked the staff to search for drug trafficking and violent crimes such as rape and child abuse. Those are the types of crimes that are most often repeated. A child abuser tends to abuse again, and a rapist tends to rape again.

After a few days — and going through only a few of the 20 or so boxes — we had our basic 100 heinous crimes, including one criminal who was actually in jail at the time he was naturalized.

We asked the FBI if it had arrest records for crimes committed by the same aliens in this country since 1996 and sent them our one hundred profiles.

Less than a week later, the FBI sent the updated arrest records to the Justice Department. (Per an agreement between the FBI and the Justice Department, all materials requested from the Bureau must go through Justice.) But when we inquired about them, the department claimed that it hadn’t yet received the records. An hour later, however, Justice called back to say that the “misplaced” reports had been located.

Of those 100 arrest records updated by the Bureau, some 20 percent showed arrests for serious crimes after the subject was given citizenship. Based on these random results, we asked for updates on every arrest record in our 20 boxes. Our plan was to update every report, using only FBI numbers and with the FBI redacting all identifying information to address the issue of privacy concerns. If, as we anticipated, anywhere near 20 percent came back with subsequent crimes, we would then confront the Justice Department, demand the identity and address of these known criminals, and point out that they had been given citizenship illegally and were still engaged in criminal activity. Unfortunately, before we could go further, the referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr arrived. Had we been given sufficient time to develop evidence and witnesses, the CUSA matter might have been included in the abuse of power impeachment article.

The 1996 arrest records are still available, and I am sure the FBI is still willing to update all of them. In the meantime, thousands of criminals are now citizens of the United States because it was assumed they would vote for Bill Clinton and Al Gore.”

Read more:

http://cis.org/BookReview-InsideStoryClintonImpeachment

From Reuters November 24, 2010.

“Concerned by North Korea’s artillery attack on a South Korean island, the 1996 beauty queen winner got muddled when tweeting for world peace via her @aliciamachado77 account.

“Tonight I want to ask you to join me in a prayer for peace, that these attacks between the Chinas do not make our situation worse,” she wrote late on Tuesday.

Her gaffe unleashed a rush of insulting posts, prompting her to go offline.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20140107091026/http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/24/oukoe-uk-korea-north-venezuela-idAFTRE6AN67020101124

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

37 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, Debate, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton, illegal aliens, Illegal immigrants, Immigrants

Tagged , ,

Kathleen Willey: Bill Clinton’s alleged sex assault victims are likely so numerous that “we could fill the entire audience”, Hillary Clinton has lied cheated and stolen our lives from us, People have died in her wake of deceit, Hillary your daughter’s president?

Posted on September 30, 2016 | 25 comments

Kathleen Willey: Bill Clinton’s alleged sex assault victims are likely so numerous that “we could fill the entire audience”, Hillary Clinton has lied cheated and stolen our lives from us, People have died in her wake of deceit, Hillary your daughter’s president?

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.”…”The Clintons’ War on Women”

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Yesterday Citizen Wells revealed how Bill and Hillary are the real misogynists, not Donald Trump as she would have you believe.

Except that the Clintons are far worse than people who just mistreat women.

Hillary Ms Clinton Ms Ogynist Ms Anthrope calls Trump misogynist, Person who mistreats women, War on women, Rapegate, Clintons systematically abused women and others sexually physically and psychologically, Hillary good president for our daughters?

From Breitbart September 25, 2016.

“EXCLUSIVE – Kathleen Willey: Bill Clinton Alleged Sex Victims ‘Could Fill The Entire Audience’ At Presidential Debate”

“Willey, a White House aide during the Clinton administration who famously accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault, joins accusers Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones in commenting on the audience of tomorrow’s debate.

Stated Willey:

Most of us are well known and our stories have been repeated several times over the years, but what concerns me the most are the voices of my sisters who are still afraid to come out of the darkness. I have communicated with a number of them and they are still terrified of publicly sharing their experiences with the Clintons.

The real story here is not one of our presence in the front row at any of these debates, but the unhindered lust for power that the Clintons have displayed for decades. Hillary Clinton has lied, cheated and stolen our lives from us. People have died in her wake of deceit.

We could fill the entire audience. I would like to see the day when these women can step into the light and share their stories of brutality, terror and intimidation without the kind of fear of intimidation and recrimination that we have experienced for far too many years.

Regarding whether she would attended the debate if asked, Willey decided, “I would refrain for now. Let her do herself in on her own.”

The issue of Clinton’s alleged mistresses and accusers was put back in the headlines Saturday when Donald Trump threatened on Twitter to bring Gennifer Flowers to the first presidential debate after Trump troll Mark Cuban said he’d sit in the front row. Flowers, who says she had a 12-plus year relationship with Clinton, responded promptly on social media, writing, “Hi Donald Trump… I’m in your corner. Of course I will see u at the debate!!”

After first denying any relationship with Flowers during a 1992 60 Minutes interview, Clinton later admitted to one sexual encounter with her in a 1998 deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit.”

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/25/exclusive-kathleen-willey-clinton-sex-victims-fill-entire-audience-presidential-debate/

From NewsMax March 4, 2001 via Citizen News.

“Kathleen Willey: They Called Other Monicas ‘Formers’

Monica Lewinsky said she had competition at the Clinton White House, claiming that at least four other female employees had enjoyed the affections of the man she called “The Big He.”

And Linda Tripp has hinted recently that Clinton kept a veritable harem of women on the payroll whose main job was to bestow sexual favors.

On Friday, Clinton sexual assault accuser Kathleen Willey lifted the veil a bit on the some of the secret goings-on at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. during this remarkable exchange with WABC Radio’s Sean Hannity:”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/30/kathleen-willey-they-called-other-monicas-formers-clinton-sexual-assault-accuser-clinton-kept-a-veritable-harem-of-women-on-the-payroll-whose-main-job-was-to-bestow-sexual-favors-newsmax-march/

“DOLLY KYLE BROWNING, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, et al.,

Defendants.”

“Ms. Kathleen Willey

Plaintiffs seek to question Ms. Willey about threatening incidents she said occurred before her deposition in the Jones case. The incidents — nails in her car tires, the disappearance of the family cat, and an unknown (at the time) jogger who questioned her about the prior two incidents, asking “Don’t you get the message?” – were apparently an effort to intimidate her from giving truthful testimony in the Jonescase. Plaintiffs also want to question her about her statements that Clinton lawyer, Robert Bennett, threatened her suggesting she should plead the Fifth Amendment and hire a criminal defense lawyer before her Jones deposition. Plaintiffs also want to inquire about private investigator Jared Stern who, at the behest of Martin Landow, Democratic Party contributor, was hired to conduct a “noisy” investigation of her during the Jones case and Independent Counsel investigation.

Ms. Willey worked in the White House as a volunteer in 1993. In early 1998, she claimed that she had been sexually groped by Clinton on November 23, 1993, in the same Oval Office room where he later had an affair with Monica Lewinsky. In an interview with 60 Minutes’ Ed Bradley, she stated that Clinton embraced her, kissed her, touched her breast, and placed her hand on his genitals. Willey also told ABC News that two weeks before her January 11, 1997 deposition in the Jones case, she found masses of nails in three of her car tires. Shortly thereafter, her cat, which she had had for many years, disappeared. Then, just before she testified in the Jones case, a jogger stopped her and asked her about her tires, her cat, and her children — by name. “Don’t you get the message?” he asked, and then jogged off. The jogger was recently identified as Cody Shearer, the brother-in-law of Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott and long-time friend of Clinton.

Willey confirmed and elaborated upon her account of this incident in a recent interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews. She described in more detail her encounter with the mysterious jogger in her Virginia neighborhood on January 8, 1998, just days before her deposition in the Jones case:

WILLEY: . . . I went out for a walk. I had my three dogs with me, and I saw a man coming towards me. And I at first thought that he was a neighbor. . . . And he was coming towards me, and he called my – out my name, and he said, ‘Kathleen.’ And I stopped and I said, ‘Yes?’ And he said, ‘Did you ever find your cat?’ And I said, ‘No.’ . . . I’d asked a couple of neighbors to keep an eye out for this family pet, a 13-year-old cat. I’d never told anybody his name. I just described him to these neighbors, and I thought that maybe word had gotten around in the neighborhood  . . ..

And so he asked me, ‘Did you ever find your cat?’ And I said ‘No, I didn’t.’ And I said . . . ‘Not – no, I haven’t, and we – we really miss him.’ And then he said, ‘Did you ever get those tires fixed on your car?’ And I said ‘No.’ And that’s when the hairs started standing up on the back of my neck.

And he said . . . ‘That – that cat of yours, he was a nice cat.’ And he said . . . ‘Bullseye was his name, wasn’t it?’ ‘He was a really nice cat.’ And I said ‘How do you know my cat’s name? I mean, what – how do you know anything about this?’ And then I said, ‘And how do you know about my car and how do you know about the tires?’ And he said, ‘Well, did you ever get them fixed?’ And I said ‘yes, I did.’ . . . It was – it was a very insidious thing, and it was meant to scare me.. . .

MATTHEWS: And it did, to some extent. You testified a couple of days later in a kind of hesitant manner.

WILLEY: He asked me about my children by name. ‘How are your children? How are Shannon and Patrick?’ . . .

WILLEY: He asked how they were and, at the – at this point, I started asking him who he was and what he wanted.

MATTHEWS: Right.

WILLEY: And he just looked me right in the eye and he said, ‘You’re just not getting the message, are you?’ And I turned around and – and ran. I had no business running, and probably ran about 100 yards, I was so frightened, and I turned around and he was gone.

Willey later stated to Matthews that she recognized the man from pictures shown to her by ABC News reporter Jackie Judd. When asked by Matthews if it was Cody Shearer, Willey said that she couldn’t say, citing the Independent Counsel’s investigation. Id. NewsMax.com reports that Willey later told Matthews off camera that the stranger was in fact Clinton operative Cody Shearer.

Willey also told 60 Minutes that she felt pressured by Clinton’s lawyer Bob Bennett. She said that Bennett suggested she plead the Fifth Amendment and hire a criminal lawyer. According to Willey, “the insinuation to me was that Mr. Bennett was implying that I was going to face some kind of a criminal charge for perjury or – or something else, and that I would need an inside the loop – an inside Washington criminal lawyer, and . . . I didn’t and I don’t.”

Willey also stated that Nathan Landow tried to pressure her to keep her story secret. ABC News reported that Landow poured over $247,000 and raised over $600,000 for Clinton’s presidential campaigns. He reportedly pressured Willey in the weeks before and after her Jones deposition to deny her accusation that Clinton groped her, and to state that nothing had in fact happened.

ABC News also reported that a private investigator, Jared Stern, was hired by Landow’s lawyer “to pull Willey’s phone records, to find out what medications Willey might be taking and to conduct a ‘noisy’ investigation aimed at making sure Willey knew she was being watched.” Stern’s lawyer stated that Stern “perceived a situation where he was being asked to do something he wasn’t comfortable with.” As a result, Stern called Willey and left a message – using an alias – warning her that someone wanted to do her harm.

Given this information, Plaintiffs submit that Ms. Willey’s expected testimony is probative of, inter alia, obstruction of justice, obstruction of a criminal investigation, victim/witness tampering, and victim/witness retaliation by Clinton and his agents in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1510, 1512 and 1513.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/08/browning-vs-clinton-plaintiffs-expedited-motion-for-leave-to-perpetuate-testimony-of-threatened-witnesses-case-no-98-1991-gennifer-flowers-juanita-broaddrick-linda-tripp-monica-lewinsky-paul/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

25 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, corruption, Crime, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton

Tagged , , ,

Hillary Ms Clinton Ms Ogynist Ms Anthrope calls Trump misogynist, Person who mistreats women, War on women, Rapegate, Clintons systematically abused women and others sexually physically and psychologically, Hillary good president for our daughters?

Posted on September 29, 2016 | 18 comments

Hillary Ms Clinton Ms Ogynist Ms Anthrope calls Trump misogynist, Person who mistreats women, War on women, Rapegate, Clintons systematically abused women and others sexually physically and psychologically, Hillary good president for our daughters?

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.”…”The Clintons’ War on Women”

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton are misogynists.

People who mistreat women.

Bill is an uber misogynist, a serial rapist.

Hillary is a misogynist because she is a misanthrope.

She treats everyone badly.

However, her efforts go way beyond just treating women badly.

Her efforts are criminal.

She has the gall to call Donald Trump a misogynist.

Trump with all of his flaws is a saint compared to Hillary Clinton.

Let’s begin with David Schippers.

WHO IS DAVID SCHIPPERS?

“David Schippers, a long time Democrat and 2 time voter for Bill Clinton conducted an investigation for the House Judiciary Committee. So his findings were hardly part of a right wing conspiracy.

In fact, if there was any conspiracy, it included Republicans and Democrats who did not want to get their hands dirty or remove Clinton from office.

Schippers found far more felonious and/or improper activity by Bill Clinton than what was presented. He was restricted by time constraints and limited to the immediate scandals presented to him.”

Clinton Impeachment 101, 15 counts “events” presented October 5, 1998 by David Schippers Democrat to House Judiciary Committee, Possible felonies which may constitute grounds for impeachment inquiry, INS immigration naturalization investigation not included

David Schippers, on Free Republic Radio described Hillary Clinton as “evil incarnate.”

WHO IS DOLLY KYLE BROWNING?

From the Dolly Kyle Browning Declaration March 6, 1998.

“My name is Dolly Kyle Browning. I am over twenty-one years of age and I am fully competent to make this declaration.

1. I have known William Jefferson Clinton since I was eleven years old. I call him “Billy.” We attended high school together. During the period from the mid-1970’s until January 1992, we had a relationship that included sexual relations. The frequency of our contact with each other, and the frequency of our sexual encounters, varied over that time period, but we did have sexual relations many times during that time period.

2. Our relationship ended abruptly in January of 1992 when Billy would not return my telephone call. I told his secretary, Linda, that a tabloid had the story about me and Billy. I asked her to have him call me and he refused. Instead he had my brother, who was, at that time, working in the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign, call me from Billy’s New Hampshire apartment or office. My brother said that Billy was afraid to talk to me because everyone thought that I might record the conversation as Gennifer Flowers had done. He said “we” think you should deny the story. He finally said: “if you cooperate with the media we will destroy you.”

3. The next time I spoke with Billy was at our high school reunion in 1994. At that reunion he and I had a conversation that lasted approximately 45 minutes. At the reunion, but prior to our conversation, I had avoided contact with Billy. He approached me sometime around midnight. He greeted me, saying “how are you?” I responded: “You are such an ass-hole, I can’t believe you’d even bother to ask!” When I said “ass-hole” a Secret Service Agent reached to grab me. Billy physically blocked the agent’s arm and said “it’s alright” or words to that effect. He said “we have to talk.” During this conversation, we sat in two chairs in front of a large column in the ballroom where our reunion dance was being held. There were several hundred other people in the ballroom. Dance music was playing almost continuously during our conversation. During our conversation our faces were close together. We were speaking in a volume that was only just loud enough to hear each other over the background noise. The only people within at least six feet of us during our conversation were two male Secret Service agents. At one point a Caucasian woman whom I do not know interrupted us and told Billy that the party was over, they were closing the bar and that he needed to say good bye to some people. Billy said to tell them to keep the bar open. She asked: “who is going to pay for that?” He replied: “we will.” The entire exchange with this unknown woman lasted less than one minute. She then left our presence. The Secret Service agents were standing one on each side of us so that we, Billy, the agents and I, were effectively in a row with an agent at either end. There was one agent approximately one foot from me and a second agent approximately one foot from Billy.

4. Our conversation began with my confronting him for not returning my call in early 1992. This lead to a discussion of many things, including his affair with Gennifer Flowers. I reminded him that he had threatened to destroy me and he said he was sorry. We discussed many other things. At the end of the conversation he asked me to come to Washington. He said “You can live on the hill. I can help you find a job.”

5. I have reviewed the notes attached to this declaration as Exhibit A. I can state unequivocally that those notes are not an accurate account of the conversation or of the entire evening. The notes attributed to Marsha Scott are false. She did not stand by Billy Clinton during my conversation with him. Neither she nor anyone other than possibly the two male Secret Service Agents were in a position to hear our conversation. At no time during the conversation did I say that any statement I had made to him or about our relationship was false.

6. The letters attached hereto and labeled as my deposition Exhibits 1-12 are true copies of some of the letters I received from Billy over the years.

7. My sister, Dorcy Kyle Corbin, is an attorney in North Little Rock, Arkansas. After I was subpoenaed in the Paula Jones v. William Jefferson Clinton case, I called Dorcy. She immediately called Bruce Lindsey. He returned her call to an air pager from South America, where he was at the time. Shortly thereafter, she received and forwarded to me the items attached hereto as Exhibit B.

8. In the fall of 1994, through the intermediaries of Dorcy Kyle Corbin and Bruce Lindsey, Billy and I reached a “deal.” The “deal” was that I agreed not to tell the true story about our relationship if he would not tell any lies about me. I agreed not to use, in public, the “A words” which were defined as “adultery” and “affair.” I was allowed to say that we had a thirty-three year relationship that, from time to time, included sex. If I needed to contact Billy, I would call Dorcy and she would call Bruce Lindsey. I used this method of communication several times over the years.”

Declaration of Dolly Kyle Browning March 6, 1998, Paula Jones’s lawyers released, Sexual relationship with Bill Clinton from mid-1970’s until January 1992, 1994 high school reunion encounter, “I agreed not to tell the true story about our relationship”

 

HOW CREDIBLE IS DOLLY KYLE BROWNING?

She has written a book: “Hillary the Other Woman.”

“Foreward
“This book Hillary the Other Woman is as timely as tomorrow’s newspaper, and its author Dolly Kyle is as fascinating as any person I have met. Moreover, the events, characters, and encounters described in these pages reveal Ms. Kyle’s firsthand knowledge obtained over many years.
My conclusion that Ms. Kyle is narrating the truth was first based upon lengthy and specific investigations conducted by the staff of the House of Representatives Judicial Committee in the course of the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton.  As a consequence of our findings, we intended to put forward Dolly Kyle as our chief witness at the anticipated Senate trial. Unfortunately that trial never took place thanks, in the main part, to the craven cowardice of the Republican leadership.
Based upon my knowledge of her character and integrity, I can say without qualification that Dolly Kyle’s word is as solid as gold.”
“There is no doubt in my mind that every statement in this book is absolutely true and correct.”
— David P. Schippers, Attorney and Chief Investigative Counsel for the U.S. House Judicial Committee for the Clinton Impeachment”

 

From Breitbart May 15, 2016.

“Hillary Clinton is not only an “enabler,” she is a “terrorist” who “terrorizes” her husband’s alleged lovers and women who accuse him of sexual assault, says former Dallas lawyer Dolly Kyle, who says she had a long-running affair with Bill Clinton.
In an interview, Kyle claimed that “Billy” Clinton, as she called him, once boasted to her that he had had sex with about 2,000 women. She described Clinton as a “sex addict” who has some “sick, sick need” to “control women.”

“Aaron, Hillary is an enabler is about the nicest thing you can say about her,” stated Kyle when asked about a statement last Friday from Donald Trump, who slammed Hillary Clinton as an “unbelievably nasty, mean enabler” who “destroyed” the lives of her husband’s mistresses and alleged victims.

Continued Kyle: “The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim. … That’s what terrorism is. It changes people’s lives by changing their decisions about what they would otherwise do. And these women who might otherwise speak up are so afraid that they won’t say anything.”

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/15/exclusive-clintons-alleged-ex-lover-hillary-terrorist-sex-addict-bill-told-2000-women/

From Breitbart September 2, 2015.

“New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone has a new book, The Clintons’ War on Women, and he spoke exclusively to Breitbart News about the revelations he is making about Bill and Hillary Clinton.”

“It’s a horrifying true story of rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed and power.”

“Stone coauthored the book with Robert Morrow, a political researcher and historian. Based on their research, the two show how Bill and Hillary left a trail of assault accusations, intimidation, and cover-ups against women and children.

The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.

Hillary Clinton’s core agenda is a quest for power, even while she presents herself as champion of women’s issues, Stone says.

“If Hillary intends to build her campaign around an appeal to women, her campaign is built on quicksand,” said Stone. But “Hillary is a life-time abuser of women and her advocacy on women issues rings hollow,” he said.

The book includes details about Clinton’s alleged crimes in Arkansas, in the White House, during her term as Secretary of State, and at the Clinton Foundation, and concludes with revelations about Hillary’s current presidential campaign.

“She’s a life-long abuser of women. She denigrates, degrades and threatens those women who are unlucky enough to be the sexual assault victims of her husband, and that number, you know, is in the hundreds,” Stone said exclusively to Breitbart News.

He explained the book focuses on 14 individual cases in which Hillary hired private detectives who “threatened and silenced” Bill’s victims.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/02/exclusive-roger-stone-touts-his-new-book-the-clintons-war-on-women/

 

From The Daily Caller February 4, 2016.

“Kathleen Willey, a former White House aide who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault, told The Daily Caller Wednesday of the tactics she believes Hillary used to order the suppression of her deposition and how she admires Donald Trump.

Despite Hillary’s claims that she is a running a campaign of “love and kindness,” Willey told us during the months leading up to her deposition, “all I felt was fear and terror.””

“It is for this reason she was so enraged hearing Hillary Clinton say, “every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.”

“If I had a gun I would have shot the TV screen out. I was so angry. I was so angry when I heard her say that. In fact, I was so incredulous that I actually replayed it five times to make sure I heard what I heard. I could not believe what was coming out of this woman’s mouth, and I thought ‘who in the name of god is talking to this woman? Who’s consulting with her?’ Of all the people in the world to say that,” said Willey.

It was in January that Donald Trump said Bill Clinton was, “one of the great woman abusers of all time,” and that Hillary was an “enabler.””

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/clinton-sexual-assault-accuser-admires-trump/#ixzz4LftTUol4

From WND November 27, 2007.

“KATHLEEN WILLEY: HILLARY BEHIND ‘TERROR’ CAMPAIGN”

“Along with the smears were acts of intimidation, she says.

Two days before her testimony in the Paula Jones case, she says she was approached at dawn by a stranger while walking in her neighborhood. The man threatened her and her children by name, and references were made to her damaged car and missing 13-year-old pet. The message, she said, was clear: Remain silent.

A day after the deposition, she found an animal skull on her porch.”

“Willey recounts an incident between Hillary Clinton and Juanita Broaddrick, who claimed she was raped by Bill Clinton when he was Arkansas attorney general.

Two weeks after the claimed rape, Broaddrick and her husband attended a political gathering at which the Clintons made an appearance. Broaddrick says Hillary Clinton said, “I am so happy to meet you. I want to thank you so much for everything you do for Bill.” Broaddrick started to turn away while Hillary held on to her hand. “Looking less friendly,” Hillary reiterated, “Everything you do for Bill.”

Willey says Broaddrick told her it “scared the living hell out of her.” Hillary’s meaning was unmistakable, Broaddrick believes: Thank you for keeping quiet for Bill.

As WND reported in September, Willey suspects the Clintons were behind a break-in of her home over the Labor Day weekend in which a copy of a manuscript for her book was stolen.

Along with a long list of groups in the “vast right-wing conspiracy,” Broaddrick, Jones, Flowers and another accuser, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, also were investigated by the IRS.”

Kathleen Willey: Hillary behind ‘terror’ campaign

From NewsMax via Citizen News February 28, 2000.

“HILLARY’S REIGN OF TERROR, HER ENEMIES HAVE BEEN HARASSED INVESTIGATED AUDITED AND BLACKLISTED”

“King George III was a powder puff compared to Hillary. The last eight years have revealed her brutal character. Hillary has abused the police powers of the state more brazenly than Nixon ever dared. Her enemies have been harassed, investigated, audited and blacklisted. If this woman comes to New York, her Gestapo tactics will come with her.”

“Filegate has been similarly whitewashed. How many New Yorkers know that over 900 FBI background files on potential enemies were secretly obtained by the White House? How many know that Hillary is a key suspect?

Several witnesses have stated that Craig Livingstone, the White House operative who obtained the files, was Hillary’s agent, reporting directly to her. This would dovetail with reports that Hillary ran a “war room,” whose purpose was to “smear, defame and harm perceived adversaries,” as alleged in a lawsuit by Gennifer Flowers.

Judicial Watch, which represents Flowers, has filed suit on behalf of several women – including alleged Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick – accusing the White House of using FBI files to intimidate, silence and discredit them.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/08/12/hillarys-reign-of-terror-her-enemies-have-been-harassed-investigated-audited-and-blacklisted-hillarys-1993-purge-of-the-white-house-travel-office-goal-was-to-free-up-jobs-for-political-cronies/

Juanita Broaddrick transcript NBC Dateline report conducted January 20, 1999

“Broaddrick: “Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip (she cries). Just a minute… He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. (crying) And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen (crying) but he wouldn’t listen to me.””

“Myers: “You’re saying that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted you, that he raped you.”

Broaddrick: “Yes.””

http://citizenwells.net/2016/08/18/juanita-broaddrick-transcript-nbc-dateline-report-conducted-january-20-1999-bill-clinton-rape-of-jane-doe-number-5-its-important-to-me-to-tell-what-happened-broaddrick-pulled-into-paula/

From NewsMax via Citizen News September 6, 2000.

“Schippers: ‘I Wanted Broaddrick to Testify’, They were all over that woman “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob), Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known”

“Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick would have been called to testify at President Clinton’s Senate impeachment trial about attempts to keep her from telling her story, former chief impeachment prosecutor David Schippers says. But he had already ruled her out as a trial witness by the time he learned the details of Broaddrick’s intimidation.

“It was right when we were working on (her case),” Schippers told NewsMax.com in an exclusive Labor Day weekend interview. “Because my investigator, Diana Woznicki, who was just about in daily contact with Broaddrick, would come in and say, ‘Juanita called me. There’s a guy parked outside her house. … She said she felt that somebody was watching her.’ ”

Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.

“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””

http://citizenwells.net/2016/08/17/schippers-i-wanted-broaddrick-to-testify-they-were-all-over-that-woman-and-it-was-the-type-of-stuff-we-ran-into-with-the-outfit-the-chicago-mob-intimidation-just-by-watching-her-making-the/

“AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON,

BY JUANITA BROADDRICK

‘DO YOU REMEMBER?’
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000

As I watched Rick Lazio’s interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio’s views
regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.

I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were
twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on
television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and
maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill
Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton’s bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering.
Do you remember? You told the driver, “Bill has talked so much about Juanita”, and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.
Yes, I can answer Brit Hume’s question. You are the same Hillary that you were
twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

Juanita Broaddrick
Arkansas”

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/juanita.htm

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

18 Comments

Posted in Bill Clinton, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, corruption, Crime, Election, Election 2016, Hillary Clinton

Tagged , , , , ,

Lester Holt perpetuates media lie about birthers Donald Trump Hillary Clinton, Holt ignorant biased and media schill, No proof Obama natural born citizen, Obama has not provided certified copy of original birth certificate, Trump telling truth

Posted on September 27, 2016 | 40 comments

Lester Holt perpetuates media lie about birthers Donald Trump Hillary Clinton, Holt ignorant biased and media schill, No proof Obama natural born citizen, Obama has not provided certified copy of original birth certificate, Trump telling truth

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“#CNN says #Hillary team in 2008 never raised #birther issue. #SidBlumenthal, long-time #HRC buddy, told me in person #Obama born in #kenya”…James Asher, Twitter

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

 

First of all, Obama’s eligibility as a natural born citizen and the “birther” issue was an inappropriate topic for inclusion in race relations in America in the debate last night.

Obama is not the first black president of the US. He is mixed race and his ethnicity, if we can believe anything about the narrative of his life, is 50 % white, the rest black and Arab.

Obama has used Justice Dept. attorneys at taxpayer expense, in multiple cases, for years to help keep his records hidden. This includes original birth certificate, college records, Selective Service application and other records.

Once Obama began hiding his records, and this happened well before the 2008 election, he became fair game for being challenged.

The document released on WhiteHouse.gov in 2011 is not a certified copy of an original birth certificate. Read the bottom.

Obama may have a document that Hawaii considers a birth certificate but it does not prove birth there.

From the debate:

“HOLT: Mr. Trump, for five years, you perpetuated a false claim that the nation’s first black president was not a natural-born citizen. You questioned his legitimacy. In the last couple of weeks, you acknowledged what most Americans have accepted for years: The president was born in the United States. Can you tell us what took you so long?

TRUMP: I’ll tell you very — well, just very simple to say. Sidney Blumenthal works for the campaign and close — very close friend of Secretary Clinton. And her campaign manager, Patti Doyle, went to — during the campaign, her campaign against President Obama, fought very hard. And you can go look it up, and you can check it out. TRUMP: And if you look at CNN this past week, Patti Solis Doyle was on Wolf Blitzer saying that this happened. Blumenthal sent McClatchy, highly respected reporter at McClatchy, to Kenya to find out about it. They were pressing it very hard. She failed to get the birth certificate.

When I got involved, I didn’t fail. I got him to give the birth certificate. So I’m satisfied with it. And I’ll tell you why I’m satisfied with it.

HOLT: That was…

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: Because I want to get on to defeating ISIS, because I want to get on to creating jobs, because I want to get on to having a strong border, because I want to get on to things that are very important to me and that are very important to the country.

HOLT: I will let you respond. It’s important. But I just want to get the answer here. The birth certificate was produced in 2011. You’ve continued to tell the story and question the president’s legitimacy in 2012, ’13, ’14, ’15…

TRUMP: Yeah.

HOLT: …. as recently as January. So the question is, what changed your mind?

TRUMP: Well, nobody was pressing it, nobody was caring much about it. I figured you’d ask the question tonight, of course. But nobody was caring much about it. But I was the one that got him to produce the birth certificate. And I think I did a good job.

Secretary Clinton also fought it. I mean, you know — now, everybody in mainstream is going to say, oh, that’s not true. Look, it’s true. Sidney Blumenthal sent a reporter — you just have to take a look at CNN, the last week, the interview with your former campaign manager. And she was involved. But just like she can’t bring back jobs, she can’t produce.

HOLT: I’m sorry. I’m just going to follow up — and I will let you respond to that, because there’s a lot there. But we’re talking about racial healing in this segment. What do you say to Americans, people of color who…

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: Well, it was very — I say nothing. I say nothing, because I was able to get him to produce it. He should have produced it a long time before. I say nothing.

But let me just tell you. When you talk about healing, I think that I’ve developed very, very good relationships over the last little while with the African-American community. I think you can see that.

And I feel that they really wanted me to come to that conclusion. And I think I did a great job and a great service not only for the country, but even for the president, in getting him to produce his birth certificate.

HOLT: Secretary Clinton?

CLINTON: Well, just listen to what you heard.

(LAUGHTER)

And clearly, as Donald just admitted, he knew he was going to stand on this debate stage, and Lester Holt was going to be asking us questions, so he tried to put the whole racist birther lie to bed.

But it can’t be dismissed that easily. He has really started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American citizen. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted, he persisted year after year, because some of his supporters, people that he was trying to bring into his fold, apparently believed it or wanted to believe it.

But, remember, Donald started his career back in 1973 being sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination because he would not rent apartments in one of his developments to African-Americans, and he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department.

So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior. And the birther lie was a very hurtful one. You know, Barack Obama is a man of great dignity. And I could tell how much it bothered him and annoyed him that this was being touted and used against him.

But I like to remember what Michelle Obama said in her amazing speech at our Democratic National Convention: When they go low, we go high. And Barack Obama went high, despite Donald Trump’s best efforts to bring him down.

HOLT: Mr. Trump, you can respond and we’re going to move on to the next segment.

TRUMP: I would love to respond. First of all, I got to watch in preparing for this some of your debates against Barack Obama. You treated him with terrible disrespect. And I watched the way you talk now about how lovely everything is and how wonderful you are. It doesn’t work that way. You were after him, you were trying to — you even sent out or your campaign sent out pictures of him in a certain garb, very famous pictures. I don’t think you can deny that.

But just last week, your campaign manager said it was true. So when you tried to act holier than thou, it really doesn’t work. It really doesn’t.”

My response:

HOLT: “Mr. Trump, for five years, you perpetuated a false claim that the nation’s first black president was not a natural-born citizen. You questioned his legitimacy. In the last couple of weeks, you acknowledged what most Americans have accepted for years: The president was born in the United States. Can you tell us what took you so long?”

Holt, in step with the mainstream media is lying. There is zero proof that Obama was born in the US.

TRUMP: “I’ll tell you very — well, just very simple to say. Sidney Blumenthal works for the campaign and close — very close friend of Secretary Clinton. And her campaign manager, Patti Doyle, went to — during the campaign, her campaign against President Obama, fought very hard. And you can go look it up, and you can check it out. TRUMP: And if you look at CNN this past week, Patti Solis Doyle was on Wolf Blitzer saying that this happened. Blumenthal sent McClatchy, highly respected reporter at McClatchy, to Kenya to find out about it. They were pressing it very hard. She failed to get the birth certificate.”

“Secretary Clinton also fought it. I mean, you know — now, everybody in mainstream is going to say, oh, that’s not true. Look, it’s true. Sidney Blumenthal sent a reporter — you just have to take a look at CNN, the last week, the interview with your former campaign manager. And she was involved. But just like she can’t bring back jobs, she can’t produce.”

CLINTON: “And clearly, as Donald just admitted, he knew he was going to stand on this debate stage, and Lester Holt was going to be asking us questions, so he tried to put the whole racist birther lie to bed.

But it can’t be dismissed that easily. He has really started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American citizen. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted, he persisted year after year, because some of his supporters, people that he was trying to bring into his fold, apparently believed it or wanted to believe it.”

Hillary goes on to try to paint Trump as a racist but notice that she never denies her birther position.

Furthermore, if anyone is a racist it is Hillary.

“Patterson said Hillary was no stranger to the “N” word either.

HANNITY: How many times did you hear Hillary use the “N” word?

PATTERSON: Probably six, eight, ten times. She would be upset with someone in the black community and she would use the “N” word, like, you heard they’ve got the president’s brother on tape using the “N” word. So, yeah it was used.

The former Clinton bodyguard said he knew four or five others once close to the Clintons who would be willing to corroborate claims about Bill and Hillary’s bigoted language on the record.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/05/19/hillary-slurred-jews-10-to-20-times-used-n-word-too-bodyguard-newsmax-july-17-2000-real-hillary-and-bill-clinton-used-nigger-when-upset-with-someone-in-the-black-community/

Holt continues to push the inappropriate issue with Trump.

“I’m sorry. I’m just going to follow up — and I will let you respond to that, because there’s a lot there. But we’re talking about racial healing in this segment. What do you say to Americans, people of color who…”

This is one of many examples during the debate where Holt is demanding answers from Trump and not Hillary.

Trump nails it in another segment:

“I will. Look, the African-American community has been let down by our politicians. They talk good around election time, like right now, and after the election, they said, see ya later, I’ll see you in four years.

The African-American community — because — look, the community within the inner cities has been so badly treated. They’ve been abused and used in order to get votes by Democrat politicians, because that’s what it is. They’ve controlled these communities for up to 100 years.”

Hillary, Democrats and the mainstream media continue to lie to and use people of color.

The real racists in the country demand special treatment for Obama due to his skin color.

Lester Holt and anyone else in the media, quit covering for Obama and Hillary and lying to the American people.

The truth about Obama’s birth certificate and the Clintons being the first birthers.

Greensboro News Record lies about Obama birth certificate Clinton birther role and Trump statements, Repeats lies of Washington Post, Citizen Wells challenge to media, News Record and Post awarded 5 Orwells for lying to their readers

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

40 Comments

Posted in Attorneys, Barack Obama, Citizen, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Clintons, Debate, Election, Election 2016, Election update, Eligibility, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, Obama records

Tagged , , , ,