Clinton Impeachment 101, 15 counts “events” presented October 5, 1998 by David Schippers Democrat to House Judiciary Committee, Possible felonies which may constitute grounds for impeachment inquiry, INS immigration naturalization investigation not included

Clinton Impeachment 101, 15 counts “events” presented October 5, 1998 by David Schippers Democrat to House Judiciary Committee, Possible felonies which may constitute grounds for impeachment inquiry, INS immigration naturalization investigation not included

“the Democratic Party overlooked the ethical red flags and made a pact with Mr. Clinton that was the equivalent of a pact with the devil. And he delivered. With Mr. Clinton at the controls, the party won the White House twice. But in the process it lost its bearings and maybe even its soul.”…Bob Herbert, NY Times February 26, 2001

“My staff and I agreed that we needed to focus on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which appeared to be running out of control. By the time we came to the subject, investigations by the General Accounting Office (GAO) and congressional committees had already indicated that the White House used the INS to further its political agenda. A blatant politicization of the agency took place during the 1996 presidential campaign when the White House pressured the INS into expediting its “Citizenship USA” (CUSA) program to grant citizenship to thousands of aliens that the White House counted as likely Democratic voters.”…David Schippers

“That business of Broaddrick being deemed inconclusive is not true. What actually happened is, I think, Starr decided not to follow up because once Lewinsky cooperated, they figured they had their impeachable offense and decided to concentrate on that.”…David Schippers

 

 

Too many people who have any awareness of the President Bill Clinton impeachment believe that it was about a Clinton dalliance with Monica Lewinsky in the White House.

This is far from the truth.

Many young Americans have no clue.

If you are getting your information from the mainstream media, especially the Orwellian Washington Post, you are definitely misinformed.

From the Washington Post June 28, 2016.

“Young women don’t care about Bill Clinton’s sexual misdeeds”

“For months, Trump has made a play for these supporters by attacking Clinton’s feminist bona fides. To do that, he has focused largely on her husband. Bill was famously involved in a White House sex scandal and has also been accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault. Trump has been hammering the point that those allegations make Bill Clinton an “abuser” and Hillary an “unbelievably nasty, mean enabler.” He posted a video to his Instagram account in which two of Clinton’s accusers detail their allegations. Then a voice comes in over a video of a laughing Hillary, asking, “Is Hillary really protecting women?””

Read more:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/28/young-women-dont-care-about-bill-clintons-sexual-misdeeds/?utm_term=.1cd4f7456dde

Contrast that with what you will read below.

David Schippers, a long time Democrat and 2 time voter for Bill Clinton conducted an investigation for the House Judiciary Committee. So his findings were hardly part of a right wing conspiracy.

In fact, if there was any conspiracy, it included Republicans and Democrats who did not want to get their hands dirty or remove Clinton from office.

Schippers found far more felonious and/or improper activity by Bill Clinton than what was presented. He was restricted by time constraints and limited to the immediate scandals presented to him.

 

“In his new book, Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment, David P. Schippers, former Chief Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee, details his investigation of these same issues. He concludes that were he and his investigators afforded more time, it is likely the abuses of the Citizenship USA program would have been included in the list of impeachable offenses against President Clinton. Below is an excerpt from Schippers’ book, published last month by Regnery.

My staff and I agreed that we needed to focus on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which appeared to be running out of control. By the time we came to the subject, investigations by the General Accounting Office (GAO) and congressional committees had already indicated that the White House used the INS to further its political agenda. A blatant politicization of the agency took place during the 1996 presidential campaign when the White House pressured the INS into expediting its “Citizenship USA” (CUSA) program to grant citizenship to thousands of aliens that the White House counted as likely Democratic voters.”

http://cis.org/BookReview-InsideStoryClintonImpeachment

The impeachment committee barely touched the Clinton Rapegate scandals.

“Schippers, House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde’s personal pick to head the impeachment probe, promises to name names, including those of Republicans who killed his investigation in the crib and allowed Clinton to slip the noose on a whole host of allegations that have yet to be fully explained to the country.”

“Why Impeachment Failed
House Majority Counsel David Schippers Speaks Out

The House impeachment investigation into President Clinton’s alleged crimes was deliberately curtailed by congressional leaders who refused to consider key evidence beyond that which was already on the public record about the Monica Lewinsky scandal.”

“Schippers explained:

“Let me tell you, if we had a chance to put on a case, I would have put live witnesses before the committee. But the House leadership, and I’m not talking about Henry Hyde, they just killed us as far as time was concerned. I begged them to let me take it into this year.”

Schippers added, “Then I screamed for witnesses before the Senate. But there was nothing anybody could do to get those Senators to show any courage. They told us essentially, you’re not going to get 67 votes so why are you wasting our time.””

“Had these ominous accounts from Broaddrick and Willey been introduced into evidence, along with charges of suspected Clinton-connected intimidation of Elizabeth Ward-Gracen, Gennifer Flowers, Sally Perdue, Dolly Kyle Browning and others – would it have made a difference?

David Schippers remains skeptical, since he now doubts the Senate would have convicted Clinton under any circumstances. Still, congressional timidity ensured that the American people were kept in the dark about the totality of the evidence against their president.

And now, six weeks after Clinton’s acquittal, we can only guess how the press and the public might have reacted to an impeachment case built on compelling charges of mob-style thuggery, rather than lies and obstruction about consensual sex.””

Schippers’ book to reveal secret evidence against Clinton, Not a single US Senator reviewed secret impeachment evidence, Congressional leaders refused to consider key evidence beyond the public record about Monica Lewinsky, Newsmax August 7, 2000

Here are the 15 counts “events” that David Schippers presented to the House Judiciary Committee on October 5, 1998.

I.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have been part of a conspiracy with Monica Lewinsky and others to obstruct justice and the due administration of justice by:

(A) Providing false and misleading testimony under oath in a civil deposition and before the grand jury;

(B) Withholding evidence and causing evidence to be withheld and concealed; and

(C) Tampering with prospective witnesses in a civil lawsuit and before a federal grand jury.

II.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have aided, abetted, counseled, and procured Monica Lewinsky to file and caused to be filed a false affidavit in the case of Jones v. Clinton, et al., in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623 and 2.

III.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have aided, abetted, counseled, and procured Monica Lewinsky in obstruction of justice when she executed and caused to be filed a false affidavit in the case of Jones v. Clinton, et al., with knowledge of the pending proceedings and with the intent to influence, obstruct or impede that proceeding in the due administration of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503 and 2.

IV.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have engaged in misprision of Monica Lewinsky’s felonies of submitting a false affidavit and of obstructing the due administration of justice both by taking affirmative steps to conceal those felonies, and by failing to disclose the felonies though under a constitutional and statutory duty to do so, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 4.

V.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have testified falsely under oath in his deposition in Jones v. Clinton, et al. on January 17, 1998 regarding his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

VI.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have given false testimony under oath before the federal grand jury on August 17, 1998 concerning his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

VII.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have given false testimony under oath in his deposition given in Jones v. Clinton, et al. on January 17, 1998 regarding his statement that he could not recall being alone with Monica Lewinsky and regarding his minimizing the number of gifts that they had exchanged in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

VIII.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have testified falsely under oath in his deposition given in Jones v. Clinton on January 17, 1998, concerning conversations with Monica Lewinsky about her involvement in the Jones case, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

IX.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have endeavored to obstruct justice by engaging in a pattern of activity calculated to conceal evidence from the judicial proceedings inJones v. Clinton, et al., regarding his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503.

X.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have endeavored to obstruct justice in the case of Jones v. Clinton, et al., by agreeing with Monica Lewinsky on a cover story about their relationship, by causing a false affidavit to be filed by Ms. Lewinsky and by giving false and misleading testimony in the deposition given on January 17, 1998, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503.

XI.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have endeavored to obstruct justice by helping Monica Lewinsky to obtain a job in New York City at a time when she would have given evidence adverse to Mr. Clinton if she told the truth in the case of Jones v. Clinton, et al., in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503 and 1512.

XII.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have testified falsely under oath in his deposition given in Jones v. Clinton, et al. on January 17, 1998, concerning his conversations with Vernon Jordan about Ms. Lewinsky, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

XIII.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have endeavored to obstruct justice and engage in witness tampering in attempting to coach and influence the testimony of Betty Currie before the grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512.

XIV.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have engaged in witness tampering by coaching prospective witnesses and by narrating elaborate detailed false accounts of his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky as if those stories were true, intending that the witnesses believe the story and testify to it before a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512.

XV.

There is substantial and credible evidence that the President may have given false testimony under oath before the federal grand jury on August 17, 1998 concerning his knowledge of the contents of Monica Lewinsky’s affidavit and his knowledge of remarks made in his presence by his counsel in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 and 1623.

Full Report:

David P. Schippers results of analysis and review House Judiciary Committee, October 5, 1998, There exists substantial and credible evidence of fifteen separate events directly involving President William Jefferson Clinton that could constitute felonies which in turn may constitute grounds to proceed with an impeachment inquiry, 15 counts

“As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.”…David Schippers report to House Judiciary Committee

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net

 

 

 

Advertisements

18 responses to “Clinton Impeachment 101, 15 counts “events” presented October 5, 1998 by David Schippers Democrat to House Judiciary Committee, Possible felonies which may constitute grounds for impeachment inquiry, INS immigration naturalization investigation not included

  1. “I think the most compelling thing about Hillary is that she will stop at nothing to achieve her end and that she views the public as plebeians easily seduced into believing her point of view.”…Linda Tripp

  2. CW……..
    ………perhaps it is time to return to the values of yesteryear. If we don’t it is more than probable we will see a continued deterioration of the average American mind. When that happens our country will also be lost.

  3. Typical crap from MSM:

    February 11, 2009

    “Yet even while they were occurring, or at least being revealed to the public, the events which spawned the impeachment seemed unserious; a telling stain on a dress, a betrayal between friends, a cigar. But the intervening years, with their dramatic and deadly events, make the entire Clinton scandal (which I covered daily) seem like petty farce. Ten years ago, America was willing to impeach a president for lying about sex. Ten years later, there was no concomitant political push to impeach the next president for lying about the justifications for the deadly war in Iraq. Did the expensive lessons and bitter taste of the former preclude any chance for the latter? Ask Rep. John Conyers.”

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-clinton-impeachment-ten-years-later/

  4. …………for those who think Hillary is SSOOOOOOOO WONNNNNNDERFUL, I say to them by all means ELECT HER………then take notice of her INDIFFERENCE! ……..sadly AFTER THE FACT is TOO LATE to fix it. You will GET WHAT YOU VOTE FOR!

  5. oldsailor84….good morning my friend

    you said….
    oldsailor84 | September 1, 2016 at 9:46 am |
    CW……..
    ………perhaps it is time to return to the values of yesteryear….
    —————————————————————————————————– I would agree with you with one provision….that we turn the clock back to the time of King Hammurabi of Babylon.

    “An eye for an eye …” is a paraphrase of Hammurabi’s Code, a collection of 282 laws inscribed on an upright stone pillar. The code was found by French archaeologists in 1901 while excavating the ancient city of Susa, which is in modern-day Iran.

    Hammurabi is the best known and most celebrated of all Mesopotamian kings. He ruled the Babylonian Empire from 1792-50 B.C.E. Although he was concerned with keeping law and order in his kingdom, this was not his only reason for compiling his list of laws. When he began ruling the city-state of Babylon, he had control of no more than 50 square miles of territory. As he conquered other city-states and his empire grew, he saw the need to unify the various groups he controlled. We seem to have lost sight of his objectives.
    —————————————————————————————————–
    If we could turn the clock back to this time in history, I assure you there would be no “black lives matters”, no ‘alla akbar’, no rapist, or murders, no milk toast media, no ISIS, no IRS, no lying , no cheating, and no damn crooked politicians to screw up his empire….and every person who tried to take advantage of the kindness of his kingdom by oppressing his people would pay a price….like maybe an arm or leg, or both eyes….. or perhaps all of the above, if they were lucky.

  6. ……..then there are many who are beating their drum, and screaming that Trump can’t be trusted. I say to them then go and vote for the third party……..all of whom are ALSO UNKNOWN VALUES……..your vote for the third party will end with Hillary as POTUS. If you want a FREE LIVING, and FREE EVERYTHING then Hillary is your candidate. ………….but with everybody receiving free livings, American business will also go down the drain and JOBS will go with them down the drain. There will be no need for manufacturers. Everything will simply materialize out of thin air upon Hillary’s “ABRACADABRA” and the waving of her magic wand……..and VOILA…….. UTOPIA, accompanied by THE HORN OF PLENTY. Everybody can lay around,do nothing………. pick their noses, do their drugs, and stink up the room with their unwashed bodies……….and cities like Detroit will be turned into giant MOSQUES…….Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Clint wants a 550% increase in the displaced Syrians coming to America…….. Maybe it would be time to set up colonies of them right next door to Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.Clint. This way she will definitely hear the call to prayer 5 times every day over loudspeakers in her neighborhood.

  7. AND JOE BIDEN………..
    ……………IS today shoveling Hillary’s oral manure in “OHHHHH- HHHIIIIIIIO.”

  8. “As I stated earlier, this is not about sex or private conduct, it is about multiple obstructions of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tamperings and abuses of power, all committed or orchestrated by the President of the United States.”…David Schippers report to House Judiciary Committee

  9. ISN’T IT TIME WE ENFORCED THIS LAW IN AMERICA…..?

  10. AND YES IF THE LAWS……….
    …………that are ALREADY ON THE BOOKS, were enforced people like Kaepernick would probably be ejected from the game, but it is his Constitutional right to behave as he is doing. I find his behavior something which will eventually stoke the fires of hatred against his employer as well. Kaepernick might want to be very careful what he does, or says in the presence of military VETS. He might wake up in a hospital with his head 180 degrees out of position, and badly BENT.

  11. Pelosi collusion fodder, just another wing of the RICO REGIME.

    *********************

    Hacked Democrat memo exposes DEPLORABLE truth about Benghazi

    By Allen West 3:59pm September 1, 2016

    Yesterday we shared with you Secretary of State John Kerry’s wish to have the media just not tell us about Islamic terrorism. He suggested we — “we” meaning the Obama administration, of course — would be better served if the media simply wouldn’t report on it. His words further evidence that the progressive socialists seek to not just spread disinformation, but also actively suppress information. And an uninformed people are nothing more than drones, mere servants to the government.

    But, what if the liberal progressive left wanted to discredit the story, and investigative process, of the tragic deaths of Americans by Islamic terrorists?

    As reported by The Daily Caller, New documents released from Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s computer by purported hacker Guccifer 2.0, reveal democratic talking points to counter Republican Benghazi attacks.

    Hacked Democrat memo exposes DEPLORABLE truth about Benghazi
    The TRUTH comes out…

    The document casts the controversy surrounding Benghazi as “Legitimate outrage over the deaths of American diplomats mixed with partisanship.” The document also admits that then Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice “gave incorrect information on television” in the immediate aftermath of the attack.

    The first talking point focuses solely on the importance of having diplomats in dangerous places, and makes no mention of the specific circumstances of Benghazi.

    The second talking point paints any attempt at calling for accountability as “pandering to conspiracy theorists.”The third talking point denigrates the Republican led congress for investigating the specific circumstances involving the events of Benghazi. The talking point also calls for respecting the families of the fallen in Benghazi, in lieu of actually discussing what happened.

    The final talking point revolves around attacking investigators of the events of Benghazi. The talking point asks recipients to focus on the voting records of rival congressman, rather than discuss the events of Benghazi.

    If there’s one thing I praise Democrats on Capitol Hill for, it’s their ability to all parrot the same talking points. They actually remind me of the Star Trek villains, the Borg — a collective devoid of individual thought. It was all about taking the one, the individual, and making them assimilate. I truly believe somewhere at the base of the necks of House and Senate Democrats there’s a place to insert a chip that programs the leftist legislators to speak the same points, all the time, any place.

    When you read those four talking points, you can see they followed the plan to a tee. It was never about seeking the truth behind why, for 13 hours, Americans were abandoned and actually left to fend for themselves — die. For the Democrats — the House Democrat leader, no less — to issue talking rhetoric referring to seeking accountability for the tragedy in Benghazi, Libya as “pandering to conspiracy theorists” is deplorable, disgusting. There is no “conspiracy theory” behind asking a simple question about Benghazi, why were there no American assets deployed to assist those under siege? After all, unless you’re a mindless lemming and have no clue about the incident, there was an unarmed drone above doing live feed of the episode.

    These newly-revealed hacked documents let us know that then UN Ambassador Susan Rice gave incorrect information on those Sunday talk shows. The question is, why? First of all, why was it the UN Ambassador and not the US Secretary of State addressing what happened at a State Department diplomatic facility? And who decided to create the false narrative? Well, we actually know who did that — the creative writer who holds the position of Deputy National Security Advisor, Ben Rhodes. None of that line of inquiry is “conspiracy theory”; it is fact. And no talking point trying to articulate the importance of having diplomats in dangerous places can dismiss the criticality of what happened.

    Deceased Ambassador Christopher Stevens is on record requesting additional security forces for his assignment in Libya — what happened? We are told that President Obama directed all available resources to be deployed; it did not happen. Why? Who countered the direction of the Commander in Chief? That is not a “conspiracy theory”; it is a legitimate line of questioning. Then again, Obama took off on a plane for a fundraiser in Las Vegas, and you know he had to get his beauty rest beforehand. And Hillary Clinton asserted, well, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

    Here’s the difference it makes. The American people, those who are not imbibing the progressive socialist Kool-Aid, now know the leftists care little about Americans dying. These talking points confirm the fact it was NEVER about finding the truth. It was all about covering their big fat liberal progressive butts.

    As long as the liberal progressives are the ones in power, the only thing that matters is maintaining power. And that means the lives of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods and Glenn Doherty mean nothing to The Borg; after all, those four were dispensable when it came to the objective of the Collective — assimilation. And shame on a corrupt media machine that took the same talking points and aided and abetted these liars who actually are accomplices to murder.

    And who has been brought to any justice over this matter? Heck, what has happened to the one individual the Obama administration “arrested” in Libya?

    Now, you can bet the leftists detractors, who have also been given the talking points, will make their vile comments on this post. Their words will not respond to the poignant inquiries offered here; they will do as the left always does, attack the messenger as a means of deflection. A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for a liar. It is a vote for someone who did not even possess the courage and character to go before the American people and tell us what happened on her watch as Secretary of State. The death of Americans, an American Ambassador, is not just something to obfuscate, deny or lie about — dismiss as a conspiracy theory. The last time it happened was with a Democrat president, Jimmy Carter…and so it happened again. And sadly, during the previous male Clinton presidency, we had two massive terrorist attacks on US embassies.

    So, ask yourself, what do you expect from another Democrat president, a Clinton no less?

    Don’t worry, whatever happens, the left will create deceptive talking points as a remedy

    http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/hacked-democrat-memo-exposes-deplorable-truth-benghazi

  12. CW
    “A record number of Americans now dislike Hillary Clinton”

    Poor Hillary
    I’ve been trying to start a fund to keep Hillary out of jail….so far nobody wants to donate any money. huh

  13. Imagine that…she is so sweet.

  14. Pingback: Dolly Kyle Browning Bill Clinton mistress and rape victims reveal more than sexual exploits, obstruction of justice, perjury, false and misleading statements, witness tampering, abuse of power and Cocaine addiction | Citizen WElls

  15. Pingback: Hillary Ms Clinton Ms Ogynist Ms Anthrope calls Trump misogynist, Person who mistreats women, War on women, Rapegate, Clintons systematically abused women and others sexually physically and psychologically, Hillary good president for our daughters? | Citi

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s