Category Archives: constitution

Sidney Powell Lin Wood press conference watch live Dec 2, 2020, Stop the fraud, 2:05 PM Alpharetta GA. Bring your questions for Sidney me & governor

Posted on December 2, 2020 | 3 comments

Sidney Powell Lin Wood press conference watch live Dec 2, 2020, Stop the fraud, 2:05 PM Alpharetta GA. Bring your questions for Sidney me & governor

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

One of latest news releases in Georgia.

From Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al November 29, 2020.

“Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court.”

“The court will hold a in-person hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion on Friday, December 4, at 10:00 AM, EST”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/29/georgia-enjoined-from-wiping-or-resetting-any-voting-machines-judge-tomothy-c-batten-november-29-2020-hearing-december-4-2020/

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Fake News Media, fraud, News, press conference, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al Supreme Court of Wisconsin Dec 1, 2020, Absentee ballots no application or missing info or Indefinite Confinement status etc

Posted on December 1, 2020 | 4 comments

Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al Supreme Court of Wisconsin Dec 1, 2020, Absentee ballots no application or missing info or Indefinite Confinement status etc

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

 

From Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al 

December 1, 2020

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

“ISSUES PRESENTED BY THE CONTROVERSY

1. Whether absentee ballots issued in-person to voters by municipal
clerks’ offices in Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required
written application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), are illegal and
invalid.
2. Whether absentee ballots issued by municipal clerks’ offices in
Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required written
application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), should be excluded from the
Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2).
3. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) are illegal and invalid.
4. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. §
6.84(2).
5. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided are illegal and invalid.          6. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin.
7. Whether stationing poll workers, receiving ballots, witnessing
ballot certifications and other clerk’s office activities in Madison’s
“Democracy in the Park” events complied with Wisconsin Election laws.
8. Whether relief by drawdown is appropriate for legal violations
committed at the “Democracy in the Park” events. ”

“While there was a pattern of activities improperly undertaken that
affected the Election, four stand out: (1) a total of at least 170,140 absentee
ballots were improperly counted as they were issued without the elector
having first submitted a written application as expressly required by Wis.
Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar); (2) no less than 5,517 absentee ballots were improperly
counted as the certifications were, when received by the clerks’ offices,
incomplete and, as to a substantial proportion, the clerks’ offices
subsequently altered the certifications by inserting missing information; (3)
28,395 absentee ballots were counted that were improperly cast by
individuals claiming Indefinite Confinement status even as there was
“reliable information that [the]… elector no longer qualifies for the service.”
Wis. Stat. 6.86(2); and (4) 17,271 absentee ballots were improperly cast or
received at “Democracy in the Park” events.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/wisconsin-filing-12-1-20_compressed.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

Posted on November 29, 2020 | 5 comments

Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood

 

You could not ask for better witnesses and evidence for election fraud lawsuits.

The following were selected for their backgrounds, expertise and the fact that they personally observed probable fraud and certain irregularities.

Michigan.

Only one is listed because this witness was an Assistant Attorney General for Michigan for 8 years!

Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:

“87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Georgia.

Harri Hursti:

Poll Observer. “My background and qualifications in voting system cybersecurity are set forth in my December 16, 2019 declaration. ”    “I am also an expert in ballot scanning because of extensive background in digital imaging prior by work researching election systems.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.4.pdf

Susan Voyles:

Poll Manager.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.16.pdf

Mayra Romera:

Florida Bar licensed paralegal.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.11.pdf

Nicholas J. Zeher:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.15.pdf

 Ibrahim Reyes:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.17.pdf

Carlos E. Silva:

Florida trial lawyer for over 26 years.  Democrat.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.19.pdf

Kevin P. Peterford:

Attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.1.22.pdf

It’s almost like they expected widespread fraud.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Ethics, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged ,

Pennsylvania House Resolution Nov 27 “Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute”, Co- sponsorship memorandum

Posted on November 28, 2020 | 6 comments

Pennsylvania House Resolution Nov 27 “Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute”, Co- sponsorship memorandum

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the Pennsylvania House of Representatives November 27, 2020.

“A RESOLUTION

Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute.

WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and

WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and

WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and

WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and

WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.”

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=H&SPick=20190&cosponId=32628&mobile_choice=suppress

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Pennsylvania voters, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged ,

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

Posted on November 28, 2020 | 3 comments

PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

From the

Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough

Filed November 27, 2020

Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.

Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.

As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.

Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.

The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”

Read more:

https://www.scribd.com/document/486132522/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed-in-Pennsylvania-by-Judge-McCullough-Election-Likely-Unconstitutional#from_embed

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil Complaint, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Arizona mandated “hand count audit’ raises more questions than answers, Maricopa County 10.8k less senate votes, Sidney Powell 42k ballots only Biden

Posted on November 13, 2020 | 9 comments

Arizona mandated “hand count audit'” raises more questions than answers, Maricopa County 10.8k less senate votes, Sidney Powell 42k ballots only Biden

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Mantra of the left: The end justifies the means.”…Citizen Wells

 

Arizona’s mandated “hand count audit” is practically worthless.

It selects 2% of ballots by county from the “universe” of ballots that it received and kept and all that it effectively proves is that the tabulators function the same way as during the initial count.

The real questions are:

  1. How many ballots were not delivered at all or by the cutoff date?
  2. How many ballots were fraudulent?
  3. How many ballots were rejected by improper processing?
  4. How many ballots had only Biden selected & thus suspect?
  5. How many votes were misrepresented by humans?
  6. How many ballots were processed that were ineligible?

Etc, etc.

An examination of the Arizona State Hand Count Audits page raises questions that will be left to the reader for the moment.

https://azsos.gov/node/1247

An examination of the Maricopa County ‘audit” raises a least one red flag.

The difference between the presidential and senate votes.

President votes:  2,894

Senator votes:   2,678

A difference of 216.

Taking this 2% to 100% of the county the total difference for the county is

10,800.

That is the approximate current Biden lead.

Coincidence?

Is this part of the 42k ballots with only Biden selected Sidney Powell found?

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

9 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorneys, Biden, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Democrats, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Fake News Media, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Arizona election fraud bias incompetence begins at top, Katie Hobbs 2017 tweet attacks President Trump and followers, “neo-nazi base”, Outside audit required

Posted on November 13, 2020 | 7 comments

Arizona election fraud bias incompetence begins at top, Katie Hobbs 2017 tweet attacks President Trump and followers, “neo-nazi base”, Outside audit required

“Evil and stupid is a bad combination.”...Citizen Wells

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

 

Katie Hobbs, as Arizona Secretary of State, is the top elections official.

She Tweeted the following on August 15, 2017.

From Summit News November 12, 2020.

“Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is overseeing the vote counting process in the swing state, previously tweeted about President Trump pandering to his “neo-nazi base.””

“That wouldn’t be much of a shock for someone who lists her pronouns in her Twitter bio along with her support for Black Lives Matter, but given that Hobbs is now instrumental in the Arizona voting process, Trump supporters are understandably concerned.

“Anyone think we could possibly get a fair shake in front of this activist???” asked Donald Trump Jr.”

Read more:

https://summit.news/2020/11/12/official-overseeing-arizona-vote-count-process-previously-tweeted-about-trumps-neo-nazi-base/

 

The following is a snapshot (for documentation) of the mandatory “hand count audit.”

Click the County name to view the full report.

Last Updated: 11/11/2020 at 3:37 pm

COUNTY STATUS RESULT
Apache Not Yet Received from County
Cochise Completed – Passed Performed on November 4  and November 7, 2020; found to be within the acceptable margin
Coconino Completed – Passed Performed on November 4 and November 5, 2020; no discrepancies were found
Gila Not Performed Not performed as the County Chair of the Republican Party did not designate the required members for the Hand Count Election Board (A.R.S. § 16-602(B)(7))
Graham Not Yet Received from County
Greenlee Completed – Passed Performed on November 4, 2020; no discrepancies were found
La Paz Not Performed Not performed as the County Chairs of two political parties did not designate the required members for the Hand Count Election Board (A.R.S. § 16-602(B)(7))
Maricopa Completed – Passed Performed on November 4,  November 7,  and November 9 2020; no discrepancies were found
Mohave Not Yet Received from County
Navajo Completed – Passed Performed on November 4, 2020; no discrepancies were found
Pima Completed – Passed Performed on November 7, 2020; found to be within the acceptable margin
Pinal Completed – Passed Performed on November 5, 2020; found to be within the acceptable margin
Santa Cruz Not Yet Received from County
Yavapai Completed – Passed Performed on November 4, 2020; no discrepancies were found
Yuma Not Performed Not performed as the County Chairs of the Republican and Libertarian Parties did not designate the required members for the Hand Count Election Board (A.R.S. § 16-602(B)(7))

https://azsos.gov/node/1247

Under a best case scenario this type of audit will not catch all errors and fraud.

Given the extreme bias of Katie Hobbs I question even the authenticity of this audit.

We know for a fact that the Dominion hardware, software and procedures are flawed and after 3 tests by the state of Texas, they replaced Dominion.

From Citizen Wells November 12, 2020.

Arizona voting machines (tabulators) analysis and controversies, Hardware software procedures security, Trump lawsuit exposes and questions procedures

“From Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel.

“Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,”

“The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.””

““Arizona secretary of state rejects GOP lawmaker’s request for tests of voting machines

Senate President Karen Fann is seeking an independent analysis of the testing of Arizona voting machines.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/12/arizona-voting-machines-tabulators-analysis-and-controversies-hardware-software-procedures-security-trump-lawsuit-exposes-and-questions-procedures/

 

Given that the current vote spread in AZ is .34% with the proven bias and documented voter fraud and irregularities, an outside audit and investigation will be required.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Democrats, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

Posted on November 12, 2020 | 1 comment

Arizona lawsuit update Nov 12, Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State, Unlawful procedures, Judge refuses to seal names of witnesses

“Poll workers struggled to operate the new voting machines in Maricopa County, and improperly pressed and told voters to press a green button to override significant errors,”  “The result is that the voting machines disregarded votes cast by voters in person on Election Day in Maricopa County.”…Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign’s general counsel

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“Arizona’s voter participation rate is 78.6%. Wisconsin’s is over 89%. Somebody is lying.”…Citizen Wells

 

From Donald Trump v Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State.

 

1. “Qualified electors casting ballots in person on Election Day in Maricopa County submitted their completed ballot to an electronic tabulation machine. Numerous voters were alerted by these devices to a facial irregularity in their ballot—frequently an ostensible ‘overvote’ — but were induced by poll workers to override the tabulator’s rejection of the ballot in the good faith belief that their vote would be duly registered and tabulated. In actuality, overriding the electronic tabulator’s alert automatically disqualifies the putative ‘overvotes’ without additional review or adjudication.​”

2. Arizona law requires that putative overvotes be subjected to further review in
an effort to discern the actual intent of the voter. While this safeguard was afforded to putative overvotes cast on early ballots and on Election Day ballots that poll workers properly segregated in a separate repository, potentially thousands of voters across Maricopa County have been disenfranchised by systematic improper tabulator overrides.

3. Upon information and belief, the adjudication and tabulation of these ballots
will prove determinative of the outcome of the election for President of the United States in Arizona and/or other contested offices in Maricopa County.

4. Declaratory, injunctive and mandamus remedies are necessary to prevent
irreparable injury to the Plaintiffs, vindicate the clear directives of the Arizona Legislature, ensure the fair and equal treatment of all Maricopa County electors, and secure the integrity of the results of the November 3, 2020 general election.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-complaint-with-attachments.pdf

From NewsMax November 11, 2020.

“An Arizona state court judge refused to seal evidence, including video taken within a polling place and declaration of witnesses with their name and other identifying information, in a case brought by the Trump campaign and Arizona Republican Party claiming voter fraud.

Judge Daniel Kiley refused the request, Phoenix NBC network affiliate KPNX reported, apparently agreeing with attorneys for Maricopa County officials.

The Trump campaign and Arizona GOP filed the lawsuit on Saturday claiming that thousands of votes in Maricopa County were unlawfully disqualified or considered ”overvotes” — voided because they were marked for more than one candidate in the same race. They asked for the sealing of the evidence in a subsequent motion.”

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/arizona-fraud-evidence-seal/2020/11/11/id/996632/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

1 Comment

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorneys, Biden, Bill of Rights, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil Complaint, constitution, corruption, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Lawsuits, Lawyers, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

CNN President Elect criminal lie, Inciting a riot?, There is no President Elect until January 6, 2021, Electors votes certified by Congress, There is no general election winner yet either

Posted on November 12, 2020 | 1 comment

CNN President Elect criminal lie, Inciting a riot?, There is no President Elect until January 6, 2021, Electors votes certified by Congress, There is no general election winner yet either

” the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States”…US Code certification of Electoral College votes

“When you pick up your morning or evening newspaper and think
you are reading the news of the world, what you are reading
is a propaganda which has been selected, revised, and doctored
by some power which has a financial interest in you.”…Upton Sinclair

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

THERE

IS

NO

PRESIDENT ELECT

Not Joe Biden.

Not Donald Trump.

And there won’t be until January 6, 2021 when Congress will certify the votes of the people who actually vote for the president, the electors of the Electoral College.

We don’t even have a certified general election winner yet!

CNN is mostly irrelevant and I hate to give them an audience, but this must be reported.

From CNN November 12, 2020.

“Trump voters are flocking to a TV channel that claims Biden is not president-elect”

“A big audience has sought out Newsmax TV for the first time.”

“I’m hearing two theories: First, that Fox’s early projection about Biden winning Arizona enraged Trump loyalists, causing some to flip over to Newsmax, at least temporarily. Second, that Fox’s portrayal of Biden as president-elect is causing even more angst, and sending even more viewers in Newsmax’s direction.”

“Over the weekend Newsmax pointedly said it had not called the race — which was a meaningless claim since the channel doesn’t have a decision desk. But the channel’s hosts keep repeating this claim anyway. The startup channel is tapping into a real vein of rage on the right. If Fox is merely dabbling in election denialism, Newsmax is doubling down on it. Trump campaign adviser Jason Miller was explicit on Kelly’s show Wednesday night: “We gotta stop Joe Biden from becoming the next president.”
When I interviewed Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy on CNN last Sunday, I called out his channel’s indulgence of voter fraud nonsense. I also asked if his business strategy is to tack further to the right than Fox. That’s certainly what it looks like. Newsmax has been publishing stories about its ratings gains and saying that “Fox News viewers appear to be deserting the network in droves.””

Notice the focus on messenger shooting?

CNN is potentially inciting a riot.
Lying to their already unhinged base is worse than crying fire in a crowded theater.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

1 Comment

Posted in 1984, Accountability, Biden, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, CNN, constitution, Election 2020, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Fake News Media, Lies, media, Orwellian, Presidential candidate

Tagged , , , , ,

Arizona 12k Biden lead with over 24k ballots uncounted < .5%, Attorney Sidney Powell states 42k ballots suspect, Fraud and irregularities, Recount and Fox apology required

Posted on November 12, 2020 | 4 comments

Arizona 12k Biden lead with over 24k ballots uncounted < .5%, Attorney Sidney Powell states 42k ballots suspect, Fraud and irregularities, Recount and Fox apology required

“Shipp says the Democrats know they most likely will not win back the White House in the upcoming Presidential election. Shipp contends, “Their chance of winning in 2020, especially now with Trump’s success, is getting slim, and they are getting desperate. When they get desperate, and they have done this before, I think we can count on voter fraud. They are going to have to use it, and they have used it before. In any event, they have very little chance of winning now, in my view, because the majority of Americans find their platform distasteful. So, I think this (voter fraud) is going to happen.”…Kevin Shipp

“Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment I know how they operate,” he said, pointing out Democrats control the political apparatus that counts the votes, the polling places, and the people who count the votes. “It’s a time-honored tradition” he said of Democratic election fraud.”…Rod Blagojevich, NewsMax Nov 6, 2020

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

 

By 7:00 AM ET this morning only 12k votes separate Joe Biden and President Trump.

Over 24k ballots are uncounted.

The difference is less than .5 percent.

Numerous allegations of fraud and voting irregularities have surfaced.

From Attorney Sidney Powell.

Fraud allegations and voting irregularities including voting hardware and software must be investigated.

A recount and an apology from Fox News are required.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorneys, Biden, Citizen, Citizen Journalism, Citizen News, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Democrats, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,