Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al Supreme Court of Wisconsin Dec 1, 2020, Absentee ballots no application or missing info or Indefinite Confinement status etc
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke
From Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al
December 1, 2020
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
“ISSUES PRESENTED BY THE CONTROVERSY
1. Whether absentee ballots issued in-person to voters by municipal
clerks’ offices in Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required
written application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), are illegal and
invalid.
2. Whether absentee ballots issued by municipal clerks’ offices in
Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required written
application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), should be excluded from the
Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2).
3. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) are illegal and invalid.
4. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. §
6.84(2).
5. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided are illegal and invalid. 6. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin.
7. Whether stationing poll workers, receiving ballots, witnessing
ballot certifications and other clerk’s office activities in Madison’s
“Democracy in the Park” events complied with Wisconsin Election laws.
8. Whether relief by drawdown is appropriate for legal violations
committed at the “Democracy in the Park” events. ”
“While there was a pattern of activities improperly undertaken that
affected the Election, four stand out: (1) a total of at least 170,140 absentee
ballots were improperly counted as they were issued without the elector
having first submitted a written application as expressly required by Wis.
Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar); (2) no less than 5,517 absentee ballots were improperly
counted as the certifications were, when received by the clerks’ offices,
incomplete and, as to a substantial proportion, the clerks’ offices
subsequently altered the certifications by inserting missing information; (3)
28,395 absentee ballots were counted that were improperly cast by
individuals claiming Indefinite Confinement status even as there was
“reliable information that [the]… elector no longer qualifies for the service.”
Wis. Stat. 6.86(2); and (4) 17,271 absentee ballots were improperly cast or
received at “Democracy in the Park” events.”
Read more:
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/wisconsin-filing-12-1-20_compressed.pdf
More here:
Citizen WElls 
From Citizen Wells November 8, 2020.
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question
From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”
https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/08/wisconsin-election-breaking-news-300-am-november-8-2020-illegal-procedure-allowed-clerks-to-cure-spoiled-ballots-state-law-invalidates-any-ballot-without-a-witness-address/
AG Barr says that vote dumps of tens of thousands of votes at 3a.m. that are all for Biden and statistically impossible are not evidence of fraud that would change the election outcome.
And of course AG Barr did not comment on Hunter Biden’s laptop, but suffice it to say the emails outlining the payments of ten percent to the big guy that were confirmed with the Biden’s business partners also did not rise to the level of indicating any crimes, and thus the DOJ had no reason to do any investigative work over the last year.
Fire Barr!